| 
			 
			   
			
			  
			
			 
			
			  
			by 
			
			Robert A. Herrmann Ph. D. 
			
			Original document, June 1997 
			
			last revision, 16 MARCH 2001 
			from
			
			RobertA.Herrmann Website 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Abstract 
			
			  
			
			Terms such as the New Age and similar 
			expressions are used to express a particular form of ethical or 
			"theological" doctrine stated in the writings of Alice A. Bailey. 
			 
			
			  
			
			The terms used by Bailey and others are, at this time, being, and 
			they will continue to be, altered. However, the concepts expressed 
			within her theology have not and will not be altered. These concepts 
			are the major concern of this investigation.  
			
			 
			Many manifestations of this theology are covert. The covertly 
			controlled individuals or organizations often us different code 
			words, deny that they are associated with "diabolic" forces; but, 
			they do promulgate the same materialistic Bailey philosophy. As one 
			example, organizations that attempt to build, create, or produce 
			"God's kingdom" on earth are often covertly controlled by Bailey's 
			God and claim no association with other such groups that overtly 
			follow Bailey's theology.  
			 
			The overt manifestations tend to vary but still follow the patterns 
			dictated by Bailey. For example, consider the emphasis today upon 
			various "psychic" endeavors. These are all associated, covertly or 
			overtly, with Bailey's theology.  
			
			  
			
			This doctrine, in whole or in part, 
			has exceptional appeal and is being embraced by many individuals and 
			organizations who are being deceived relative to its true intent. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Those individuals most likely to accept portions, if not all, of 
			Bailey's doctrine are those who believe in "psychic" powers, where 
			such powers are considered as either relative to spirit beings or 
			produced by extranatural processes not associated with spirit 
			beings.  
			
			  
			
			Further, the community 
			will consider Bailey's supernaturalism as harmless and will tend to 
			embrace this Bailey doctrine since it affirms the concepts of 
			"ecumenicalism" or the belief that all theologies are converging to 
			a universe doctrine.  
			
			  
			
			The atheistic community considers Bailey's 
			supernaturalism as harmless and is embracing Bailey's concepts due 
			to her desire to destroy orthodox religions, in general, and use 
			their resources for, what she considers to be, the "true" benefit of 
			humankind. Due to Bailey's dislike for orthodox Judaism and 
			conservative Christianity, her theology will be accepted by many 
			Moslems for this specific reason.  
			
			  
			
			Since the technical aspect of her 
			theology is based upon Buddhism and Hinduism, 
			individuals who assert these beliefs are easily converted to the 
			Bailey mysticism.  
			
			
			 
			Due to the factors stated above, it is important that the public be 
			made aware of the true nature of the Bailey "theology." Using the 
			writings of the founder of the New Age theology, a theology that is 
			purposely disguised through application of code words, it is shown 
			in this article that this theology is, in all of its variations, 
			absolutely occult in character and leads to one of the most evil 
			forms of demonic possession. 
			
			  
			
			This theology is designed to prepare 
			humankind for the "appearance," in one form or another, of the
			AntiChrist. Some of the actual methods used to produce such demon 
			possession are discussed.  
			
			  
			
			It is established that the true leader of 
			the New Age movement, Bailey's God, is the Scripturally defined 
			Adversary (Satan) and that the "prayer" entitled "The Great 
			Invocation" is actually a satanic invocation designed to call forth 
			the AntiChrist. 
			 
			
			  
			
			 
			
				
					
						
							
							CONTENTS 
							
							
							
							Scientific Method Employed
							 
						 
						
							- 
							
							
							
							Introduction and Brief History
							  
							- 
							
							
							
							The Masters and Overshadowing
							  
							- 
							
							
							
							Master Jesus, Bailey's Christ 
							and God 
							  
							- 
							
							
							
							The Solar Angels and Humanity
							  
							- 
							
							
							
							From Bethlehem to Calvary
							  
							- 
							
							
							
							Methodology and the Kingdom of 
							God 
							  
							- 
							
							
							
							The New Age [Bailey] Ethics
							  
							- 
							
							
							
							The Greatest Danger
							  
							- 
							
							
							
							The Plan, More Code Words and 
							the Great Invocation
							  
							- 
							
							
							
							References 
							  
							- 
							
							
							
							Internet Examples
							  
						 
					 
				 
			 
			
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			 
			 
			Scientific 
			Method Employed 
			
			 
			The scientific method employed is generally termed probabilistic 
			analytical reasoning. In particular, the following procedures are 
			followed: A particular Bailey term or phrase A that denotes an 
			entity or concept is considered.  
			
			  
			
			Within the Bailey writings A has an 
			associated collection of describing sentences, A's describing set. 
			Statements in this set describe such things as A's behavior, or 
			attributes or relations with other terms or phrases.  
			
			  
			
			Within the Scriptures, as they would be 
			interpreted when first written, a term or phrase B that denotes an 
			entity or concept is located which has a describing set that is 
			highly similar to the Bailey describing set for A.  
			
			  
			
			The more closely 
			Bailey's describing set corresponds to the Scriptural describing set 
			and the greater the number of such corresponding sentences within 
			the sets, leads to an identification of the Bailey term or phrase 
			with the Scriptural term or phrase (i.e. A = B).  
			 
			On the other hand, using the same approach, if Bailey's describing 
			sentences for A do not correspond in this probabilistic sense to the 
			describing sentences for the Scripturally described B, then this 
			leads to the conclusion that A and B do not denote the same entity 
			or concept. In a few cases, my experience with the occult is used to 
			clarify particular concepts and this has adjoined additional 
			information to a describing set.  
			
			  
			
			A vast amount of mathematical 
			analysis can be done using describing sets.  
  
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			
			 
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			1. 
			Introduction and Brief History 
			
			 
			In Oct. 1982, the Lucis Trust published in the Reader's Digest a 
			full page advertisement called "The Great Invocation." This 
			scientific analysis is a detailed exposition of the significance of 
			this advertisement. 
			 
			The "flower" pictured in this advertisement is one of the many 
			"Lotuses" employed in occult symbolism (Exhibit 1).
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			  
			
			Exhibit 1 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			The "Great Invocation" is actually the 
			third of a series of invocations written from 1935 through 1945 
			(Exhibit 2 -6, p. v).  
			
			  
			
			This is the same as the one that now appears 
			on the Internet at
			
			http//www.lucistrust.org/gipamph.htm 
			and has not been altered from the last one in Exhibit 2.  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Exhibit 2 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			In what follows, you will not only be 
			exposed to the true occult concepts and practices used today, but 
			also the basic method used to control even those individuals who do 
			not believe in the supernatural - the method of occult 
			'overshadowing'.  
			
			  
			
			But, before proceeding, we present a brief history 
			of the individuals involved with the creation of the "Great 
			Invocation." 
			 
			Alice A. Bailey (abbr. A.A.B.) (1880 -1949) and Helena Petrovna 
			Blavatsky (H.P.B.) (1831 - 91) are apparently the founders of the 
			New Age or Aquarian Age movement (1, p. 255) which today is linked 
			to well over 10,000 organizations within the U. S. A. alone.  
			
			  
			
			As 
			stated by Bailey, the preparatory period was from 1875-1890 and the 
			teachings where preparatory and "... written down by H.P.B." (1, p. 
			255).  
			
			  
			
			The intermediate teachings were, 
			
				
				"... given 1919-1949... written down 
				by A.A.B." (1, p. 255).  
				
				"Other teachings will be... emerging 
				after 1975... to be given on a world wide scale via radio." (1, 
				p. 255). 
			 
			
			Bailey writes that H.P.B. was, 
			
				
				"That great disciple who lighted her 
				torch in the East and brought the light to Europe and America in 
				1875." (2, Dedication). However, unbiased scholars give the 
				following assessment of H.P.B. First, she "... claims to have 
				mediumistic powers." (3, p. 55).  
				  
				
				Her control was John King "a spirit 
				claiming to have been in life the famous pirate Henry Morgan." 
				(3, p. 131).  
				
				  
				
				Moreover, Bailey admits that H.P.B. was, at the 
				least, a conscious medium. "In fifty years time, the need for 
				true psychics and conscious mediums (such as H.P.B., for 
				instance) will be very great... ." (2, p. 757).  
			 
			
			H.P.B. founded the well-known occult 
			society the Theosophical Society in New York City on 13 Sept. 1875 
			(3, p. 248).  
			
			  
			
			She apparently was an assistant to a spirit medium and 
			had a well-known hatred for Christianity (3, p. 249). She faked seances and made experiments with hashish prior to founding of the 
			Theosophical Society.  
			
			  
			
			During the period 1875 - 1890, her 
			activities were investigated by the Society for Psychical Research. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Richard Hodgson reported that H.P.B.'s Theosophical Society utilized 
			conjuror's apparatuses such as "shrines" with false backs and the 
			like (3, p. 250).  
			
			  
			
			The Society for Psychical Research 
			described H.P.B. as, 
			
				
				"one of the most accomplished, ingenious and 
			interesting impostors of history."  
				
				(3, p. 55).  
			 
			
			Apparently, after 
			this investigation, she concentrated upon being a "conscious" or 
			"mental" medium.  
			
			  
			
			The "mental medium" receives 
			communication by various types of extrasensory perception. Relative 
			to this present day, from my experience, these are the only 
			procedures that have any merit. In the case of H.P.B., after the 
			methods of "apport" were exposed, she concentrated upon telepathy as 
			received from one of the Masters about whom a great deal more will 
			be detailed.  
			
			  
			
			This 'telepathic procedure' utilizes the 
			"seer" approach where an individual transcribes information received 
			by "reading" from the "astral light." This may be more simply 
			described as ordinary telepathic information being received from 
			"some" source that can control human mental impressions.  
			 
			Alice A. Bailey became associated with the Theosophical Society and 
			studied intensely occult methodology and its technical language.  
			
			  
			
			She 
			left the Theosophical Society for a, 
			
				
				"... Teaching on the New 
				Discipleship... This changed technique negates the old 
				attitudes such as that portrayed in the Theosophical 
				literature... . That earlier presentation was useful but has now 
				served its purpose."  
				
				2, pp. 251 - 252. 
			 
			
			According to Foster Bailey, A.A.B.'s 
			second husband, A.A.B. began her "telepathic" work in 1919 (2, p. 
			vi). This telepathic collaboration with her "Tibetan" (to be further 
			delineated) lasted 30 years and, indeed, we are told that, 
			
				
				"During the long course of the work 
				the minds of the Tibetan and A.A.B. became so closely attuned 
				that they were in effect... a single joint projecting 
				mechanism." (2, p. vii). 
			 
			
			In the year 1922, A.A.B. founded the 
			Lucifer Publishing Co. that later that same year was incorporated in 
			New Jersey as the "A non-profit educational corporation" under a new 
			name the Lucis Publishing Co. This publishing company is now part of 
			the Lucis Trust. 
			 
			
			  
			
			This is attested to by the library card catalogs 
			and holdings that can be found in Vol. 30, Mansell, 1969, The 
			National Union Catalog Pre-1956 Imprints page 473. (Exhibit 3).
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			  
			
			Exhibit 3 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			The twenty-four not independent books 
			written by Bailey are the basic textbooks for 
			
			the New World Order 
			(4, pp. 190-192) or what some call the New Age, the New Religion, 
			the New this or the New that.  
			 
			
			  
			
			Much of the direct evidence is taken 
			from five of the most important of these textbooks as listed in the 
			references. Indeed, there is such a vast amount of evidence that it 
			is difficult to know exactly where to start. 
			 
			
			 
			Foster Bailey writes,  
			
				
				"A Treatise on Cosmic Fires 
				[Reference 2]... carries inherent evidence that it will stand as 
				the major and most far-reaching portion of the thirty-year 
				teachings... ."(2, p. vi). 
			 
			
			This "treatise" is almost entirely 
			astrology and spiritualism in a modern mode.  
			
			  
			
			We are also told that 
			the book "The Rays and The Initiations" is to be utilized as a 
			school text for advanced initiates. Moreover, a major and continuing 
			effort must be the wide distribution of these New Age Bailey books 
			throughout the entire world (TMW, pp. 6-7).  
			
			  
			
			As an indication of this 
			wide distribution, the "textbooks" have been translated from English 
			into Spanish, Dutch, German, Greek, Italian, Russian, Polish and 
			Portuguese.  
			
			  
			
			The Lucis Trust has, at the least, three 
			worldwide offices in New York, London and Geneva. (TMW). 
  
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			2. The Masters 
			and Overshadowing 
			
			 
			The concept of the Masters, Masters of Wisdom, the Unknown Chiefs, 
			the Secret Chiefs, Brothers and all other such synonyms can be 
			traced back approximately to 1750 and the Spanish-French occultist 
			the Martine's de Pasqually (1715? - 1779).  
			
			  
			
			The term Secret 
			Chiefs was introduced by Baron Hund (1722 - 1776) for his
			Strikt Observanz Masonic system.  
			
			  
			
			The basic approach is an 
			'evolutionary approach where an individual spiritually evolves' into 
			higher and more meaningful forms until one actually becomes totally 
			a spirit being on various evolutionary levels.  
			
			  
			
			Further, Pasqually apparently introduced 
			the human biological evolution concept prior to Darwin's expanding 
			it to other biological entities. "Masters" is an interesting concept 
			especially when one considers the historical period when the concept 
			was first advanced publicly. The "Masters" concept has been employed 
			by the theosophists and other "seers" for over 200 years.  
			
			  
			
			The Masters form a major portion of the 
			occult mysteries of Blavatsky, Bailey, Olcott, Crowley, Leadbeater, 
			Besant and hundreds of other occultists of lesser fame. The 
			"theology" that the Masters "teach" is widespread. It is a major 
			part of many large "religious" organizations.  
			
			  
			
			One such organization is the Church 
			of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.  
			 
			A Master can be defined basically as a perfected man or adept whose 
			task it was (or is) to watch over and guide humanity along its path 
			of spiritual and physical evolution - with concentration on the 
			spiritual. Spiritual always refers to supernatural spirituality. 
			Masters are Godlike adepts with their "physical plane" headquarters 
			in various mountain areas especially in the Himalayas and Tibet.
			 
			
			  
			
			The Lucis Trust steadfastly 
			claims that it is a fact that the Masters exist on this physical 
			plane and even on the "dense physical plane" (i.e. the natural 
			universe). (GI, p. 9). However, unbiased investigation, even after 
			expeditions to Tibet, have failed to produce a modern manifestation 
			of a Master in dense physical form.  
			 
			It is not the purpose of this research to discuss these "adepts" in 
			any detail.  
			
			  
			
			This investigation is intended to relate the occult 
			meanings of the entities symbolized within "The Great Invocation" to 
			their Christian or Judaic counterparts if such exist. Thus, except 
			for names and the like, a subsidiary analysis of the Masters that 
			are not claimed to be associated with Judeo-Christian theology will 
			not be specifically undertaken.  
			
			  
			
			It should be pointed out, however, 
			that the Masters concept as it is utilized at present is obviously 
			an attempt to avoid the charge that the telepathic communication 
			with the Masters is communication with the "dead."  
			
			  
			
			However, as it will be established, the 
			attempt to convince the skeptic that the telepathic communication is 
			not a direct result of a subliminal implanting of the thought 
			patterns from some supernatural spiritual entity is doomed to 
			failure since Bailey writes that this is one of the major intentions 
			of the initiation process.  
			
			  
			
			This is found when the Wesek festival 
			is discussed. In this discussion, Bailey also gives the actual 
			procedures being used, at this very moment, to overshadow specially 
			selected individuals. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Some care should be exercised when reading the 
			following since a few of the words are "code" words and do not carry 
			the standard meaning. In particular, the words or phrases "pure, 
			servers of the race, inspiration, His Lord, Great Lord, His Master."
			 
			
			  
			
			I have added a few remarks denoted by [...].  
			
			  
			
			Bailey's description of 
			the first stage of overshadowing: 
			
				
				"... many cases of overshadowing 
				will be seen and will demonstrate in a three fold manner... 
				prepared disciples and highly evolved men and women, will be 
				found who will be doing the work along the lines intended, one 
				who will be occupying places of prominence which will make them 
				available for the reaching of the many; their bodies will also 
				be sufficiently pure to permit of the overshadowing. 
				 
				
				  
				
				It will 
				only be possible in the case of those who have been consecrated 
				since childhood, who have been servers all their 
				lives or who, in previous lives...
				 
				  
				
				First. 'An impression upon the 
				physical brain of the man or women, of thoughts, plans for work, 
				ideals'... which (emanating from the Avatar [Hindu: An 
				incarnation of a deity in physical (earthly) form]) 'will yet be 
				unrecognized by him' [This is a very important aspect of 
				overshadowing.]... .This is literally a form of higher 
				telepathy... .  
				
				  
				
				Second. The overshadowing of the chela [Hindu for 
				disciple] during his work (such as lecturing, writing, or 
				teaching) and his illumination for service. He will be conscious 
				of this... and will seek more and more to be available for use, 
				rendering himself up in utter selflessness to the inspiration of 
				His Lord.  
				
				  
				
				Third. The conscious co-operation of the 
				chela is necessitated in the third method of overshadowing. In 
				this case, he will (... ) surrender himself and step out of his 
				physical body, handing it over for the use of the Great Lord or 
				one of His Masters... he renders up his body, and stands aside 
				for a specific length of time." (2, p. 756-757). 
			 
			
			Certain portions of the above Bailey 
			description can be related slightly to the Christian concept of 
			being "indwelt by the Holy Spirit" on various spiritual levels. 
			 
			
			  
			
			However, type three corresponds more closely to the concept of 
			"being possessed by a spirit entity."  
			
			  
			
			An Avatar is definitely a 
			spirit being.  
			
				
				"All Avatars in the strict sense of 
				the word are liberated souls... a Master in physical plane 
				incarnation is a type of avatar for He is a 'free soul' and 
				therefore only is incarnate for specific purposes." (2, p. 722). 
			 
			
			  
			
			[Note: In this analysis, the term "demon" will often 
			be used both as a noun, adjective, and as an adverb.] 
			  
			
			
			 
			Bailey's second Master has the name Master Djwhal Khul or 
			simply Master D.K. Moreover, "he" also is called by the more 
			familiar name - The Tibetan.  
			
			  
			
			Bailey almost always writes as 
			if she is taking dictation from her Master.  
			
				
				"A.A.B. takes down to my dictation 
				an average of seven to twelve pages of typing (single-spaced) 
				each time she writes for me; but owing to the exigencies of my 
				work I cannot dictate to her every day, though I have found that 
				she would gladly take my dictation daily if I so desired;... " 
				(1, p. 251).  
				  
				
				[Master D.K.] "... is the latest of 
				the adepts taking initiation, having taken the fifth initiation 
				in 1875, and is therefore occupying the same body in which He 
				took the initiation... . His body is not a young one, and He is 
				a Tibetan."  
				
				(4, p. 57).  
			 
			
			Bailey gives more descriptions of 
			Masters in the chapter The Lodge of Masters to be found in reference 
			4.  
			
			  
			
			Further,  
			
				
				"The Master, however, can build a 
				body through which He can approach incoming disciples... He 
				will normally build this body in semblance of the human form, 
				doing so instantaneously [sudden appearance] and by an act of 
				the will, when required."  
				
				(1, p. 705). 
			 
			
			Bailey lists in her various books other 
			members of the Hierarchy. There is  
			
				
					- 
					
					Master Jupiter  
					- 
					
					Master Morya  
					- 
					
					Master Koot Humi (of Kasmiric origin) 
					 
					- 
					
					Master Jesus (the Master 
			Bailey claims that the Christians follow)  
					- 
					
					Master Rakoczi (who has a 
			home in the Carpathian mountains)  
				 
			 
			
			Indeed, Bailey informs us that 
			Master R. overshadowed Comte de St. Germain, Roger and Francis 
			Bacon. We are told that he is called "the Count."  
			
			  
			
			Then for science there is Master Hilarion, who was as, 
			
				
				"...an earlier incarnation... Paul of Tarsus."
				 
			 
			
			In 1922, Master H. occupied a Cretan body. There was the Master Serapis, 
			Master P. and many others. (4, p. 53-61). 
			 
			
			  
			
			Exhibit 4 (4, p. 
			48-49) is a key diagram that shows various Masters and their 
			relation to the Great Lords, Sanat Kumara, Solar Logos and others. 
			 
			
			  
			
			The line diagram on page 48 indicates the inner relations for these 
			spirit forms.  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			  
			
			Exhibit 4 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			
			 
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			3. Master 
			Jesus, Bailey's Christ and God 
			
			 
			The particular Masters in which we are interested, both in their 
			supernatural and dense physical plane manifestations, form a portion 
			of the Planetary Hierarchy.  
			
			  
			
			This Hierarchy will be discussed 
			shortly. Our immediate concern, however, is with the identity of 
			Bailey's Master Jesus.  
			
			  
			
			Bailey tells us that in 1922,  
			
				
				"Master M., the Master K. H. and the 
				Master Jesus are interesting Themselves closely with the work of 
				unifying, as far as may be, eastern and western thought, so that 
				the great religions of the East, with the later development of 
				Christian faith in all its many branches, may mutually benefit 
				each other. Thus eventually it is hoped one great universal 
				Church may come into being." (4, p. 55-56). 
			 
			
			Now Master D.K. (through Bailey) tells 
			us that Master Jesus  
			
				
				"... is presently [1922] living in a 
				Syrian body, and dwells in a certain part of the Holy Land...  
				His pupils are frequently distinguished by fanaticism... He is 
				tall and spare with rather a long thin face, black hair, pale 
				complexion and piercing blue eyes...  
				
				  
				
				He is well-known in Bible 
				history, coming before us first as Joshua the Son of Nun, 
				appearing in the time of Ezra as Jeshua, taking the third 
				initiation, as related in the book of Zechariah, as Joshua, and 
				in the Gospel story He is know for two great sacrifices that in 
				which He handed over His body for the use of the Christ... As Appollonius of Tyana, he took the fifth initiation... " 
				
				(4, p. 
				56).  
				  
				
				[Bailey writes,] "... the Mahommedan 
				faith will be found linked to the Christian faith because it 
				embodies the work of Master Jesus as he overshadowed one of 
				his 
				senior disciples, a very advanced initiate, Mahomet."  
				
				(1, p. 
				254).  
				
				  
				
				'Bailey claims that Master Jesus and 
				
				the 
			Jesus of the New Testament are one and the same'. 
				 
			 
			
			She writes,  
			
				
				"... The Master Jesus, the inspirer 
				and director of the Christian Church everywhere... ." 
				
				(4, p. 46).
				 
			 
			
			Further,  
			
				
				"... this can be noted in 
				the Gospel story... of the Master Jesus." 
				 
				
				(6, p. 83). 
				
				 
			 
			
			Clearly, Bailey's intent is to 
			correspond Master Jesus to Jesus Christ. For more direct evidence, 
			Bailey states  
			
				
				"Christianity will be in a state of 
				chaotic division and upheavals. When this takes place..., the 
				Master Jesus will take certain initial steps towards reassuming 
				control of His Church,... "  
				
				(6, p. 573). 
			 
			
			Numerous other references can be cited 
			that immediately lead to the conclusion that Bailey would like us to 
			believe that her Master Jesus that appears in position 6 under the 
			direction of (c) the Venetian Master and controlled by (C) that 
			Mahachohan in Exhibit 4, is the Christ Jesus.  
			
			  
			
			Observe also 
			that on page 48, Master Jesus is connected to The Bodhisattva (The Christ, 
			The World Teacher).  
			
			  
			
			Please note that according to the 
			diagram, Master Jesus is only a "far-away" disciple of the 
			Bailey's Christ and, as will be specifically shown, 
			
				
				'Master Jesus is not the Christ Himself as the concept is Scripturally 
			defined'.  
			 
			
			However, the most important and, indeed, absolute evidence 
			where Bailey attempts to establish that Jesus Christ is the same as 
			her Master Jesus is the entire book 
			
			From Bethlehem to Calvary; the 
			Initiations of  Jesus written without the aid, we are told, of Master 
			D.K. This will be analyzed shortly.  
			
			  
			
			First, it is necessary to consider the 
			Planetary Hierarchy and to identify Bailey's "Christ" and Bailey's 
			orthodox God. Notice that in Exhibit 4, Sanat Kumara, the 'Lord of 
			the World' (The Ancient of Days, the One Initiator) appears at the 
			top of the spirit entities for the Planetary Hierarchy.  
			
			  
			
			Below Sanat 
			Kumara in influence is the Bodhisattva (the "Christ"). Further, 
			below we find Master Jesus. Once the identify of Bailey's Sanat 
			Kumara is determined, then the identify of all of the other spirit 
			beings controlled by this entity will become clear. 
			
			  
			
			The original Sanat Kumara is the 
			mind-born son of the Hindu God Brahma. Brahma is the creator God who 
			was later joined by Visnu and Siva and these form the Hindu trinity. 
			Bailey equates the Christian concepts of the Father, the Son and the 
			Holy Spirit with the Hindu Gods Siva, Visnu and Brahma, 
			respectively.  
			
			  
			
			It is also 
			important to this analysis that the Masters, the Great Lords (in 
			this case, the Manu, Bodhisattva and Mahachohan) as well as Sanat 
			Kumara and his brothers (the Three Kumaras) have achieved this 
			purely spirit or semi-spirit positions through various occult 
			initiations processes. 
			 
			
			  
			
			In many cases, Bailey claims that this 
			supernatural process is the counterpart of the ordinary secular 
			evolutionary models for the physical universe. However, Bailey's 
			process has a special variation. 
			 
			As an example, Bailey's description for Sanat Kumara states that
			 
			
				
				"The Planetary Logos of our earth scheme, one of the Seven Spirits before the throne, 
				took physical incarnation, and, under the form of Sanat Kumara, 
				the Ancient of Days, the Lord of the World, came down to this 
				dense physical planet and has remained with us ever since.  
				
				  
				
				Owing 
				to the extreme purity of His nature and the fact that He is 
				(from the human standpoint) relatively sinless, and hence 
				incapable of response to aught on the dense physical plane, He 
				was unable to take a dense physical body such as ours, and has 
				to function in His etheric body."  
				
				(4, p. 28). 
			 
			
			Further, we learn that with the Sanat 
			Kumara there  
			
				
				"... come a group of other highly 
				evolved Entities, who represent His own individual karmic group 
				and those who are the outcome of the triple nature of the 
				Planetary Logos."  
				
				(4, p. 29). 
			 
			
			In order to place these spirit entities 
			in their proper linear perspective, please refer to Exhibit 5 (2, p. 
			293).  
			
			  
			
			This shows the evolution of the Universe (spiritually) as it 
			"now" appears. From the Unknown or as Bailey writes it "ONE ABOUT 
			WHOM NAUGHT MAY BE SAID" we have seven spirits of the highest order, 
			the Cosmic Logoi.  
			
			  
			
			Under each Cosmic Logos are seven Solar Logoi and 
			under each Solar Logos are seven Heavenly Men.  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Exhibit 5  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			The earth's Heavenly 
			Man is Sanat Kumara.  
			
			  
			
			Bailey tells us that 18 million years ago Sanat 
			Kumara appeared on the scene (4, p. 28).  
			
			  
			
			However, we are explicitly 
			told that many of these spirit entities obtained their lofty 
			positions through general evolutionary processes (4, p. 13) and many 
			started as human beings (4, p. 222). 
			 
			At this point, we can now easily identify Sanat Kumara. First, 
			Bailey employs many distinct synonyms for Sanat Kumara throughout 
			her writings. He is claimed to be Sanat Kumara, the Ancient of Days 
			and The Lord of the World as well as the Youth of Endless Summers 
			(4, p. 28, 38).  
			
			  
			
			Bailey claims that Sanat Kumara is the entity that 
			the orthodox Christians call God (6, p. 465). Also, the Ancient of 
			Days, the One Initiator, is claimed to refer to the Old Testament 
			God. The other synonyms Bailey uses are from Hinduism. 
			 
			Obviously, for a hundred different reasons, Sanat Kumara does not 
			correspond to the Ancient of Days as described in the Scriptures. Sanat Kumara does not exhibit the most outstanding attributes of 
			
			the 
			God - Jehovah.  
			
			  
			
			The claim that Sanat Kumara is not the 
			one and only 
			one creator God, the God of everything, (indeed, Bailey's 
			Unknown) 
			immediately eliminates Sanat Kumara as being the Old Testament 
			Ancient of Days.  
			
			  
			
			Further, the claim that Sanat Kumara 
			also corresponds to a major deity of an idolatrous religion is yet 
			another of many, many reasons why this spirit being is not, but 
			would like to be, the Old Testament God. The claim that he is the 
			orthodox God of Christianity falls for the same reasons among many, 
			many others. This leaves use with the title that Bailey uses more 
			than any other - The Lord of the World.  
			
			  
			
			This can be directly 
			translated to be the Scripturally described created spirit entity 
			called the Adversary, Satan, the Devil (9, p. 523).  
			
			  
			
			Hence, whenever Bailey and the followers 
			of her theology use the term "God" in a Judeo-Christian context they 
			mean the Scripturally defined spirit being called Satan. I also 
			point out that the original name given to Bailey's publishing 
			company was the Lucifer Publishing Company who is a ruler of a 
			planetary center (Exhibit 9 -6, 107).  
			 
			It is apparently true that in early Rabbinic usage "Lord of the 
			World" or "King of the World" is synonyms with God. But in the 
			Scriptures as they have been accepted for 2,000 years, and 
			especially in the New Testament, Lord of the World is absolutely 
			synonymous with the term Adversary (Satan).  
			
			  
			
			Now that the evidence indicates that 
			Bailey's Sanat Kumara is the Adversary, the next step is to identify 
			Bailey's Christ and determine whether he corresponds, in any manner 
			whatsoever, to the Christ of the Scriptures.  
			
			  
			
			Note that the spirit 
			entity The Bodhisattva is the department head of the Sanat Kumara's 
			Love-Wisdom aspect and Bailey defines The Bodhisattva as, 
			
				
				"The Lord Maitreya, Who is known in 
				the occident as the Christ... The Bodhisattva is the Head of 
				all religions of the world." (4, p. 216).  
			 
			
			This is also stated in the 
			
			World 
			Goodwill Web page where the, 
			
				
				'Bailey's "Christ" is claimed to carry 
			names as they have been given him in various religions such as "The 
			Lord Mitreya, Krishna, the Imam Mahdi and the Messiah."' 
				 
			 
			
			Since 
			Bailey's Christ has not as yet made an appearance in physical form, 
			then Bailey Christ is, obviously, not Christ Jesus.  
			
			  
			
			Bailey's "Christ" has attributes of 
			idolatry and also comes about by reincarnation since the 
			
			Lord Maitreya is to be in a physical manifestation the fifth 
			reincarnation of Buddha (3). Hence, it is certainly not the Messiah 
			of the Old Testament.  
			
			  
			
			Bailey actually states that her '"Christ" is 
			not the entity that differentiates Christianity from all other world 
			religions'.  
			
				
				"The Tibetan has asked me to make 
				clear that when he is speaking of the Christ he is referring to 
				His official name as Head of the Hierarchy. The Christ... ; He 
				does not belong to the Christian world any more than to the 
				Buddhist, the Mohammedan or any faith.  
				
				  
				
				There is no need for any 
				man to join the Christian Church in order to be affiliated with 
				the Christ."  
				
				(6, p. 558 -footnote). 
				 
			 
			
			Of course, from a New Testament 
			viewpoint, Bailey's Christ has attributes that directly contradict 
			the attributes and statements made by Jesus and all of his 
			Apostles. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Further, since she specifically denies that the New Testament Jesus 
			is the Christ, and the Master Jesus is but a disciple of the true 
			"Christ," then she and any individual who follows this aspect of her 
			theology, in any manner whatsoever, is an antiChrist.  
			
			  
			
			Since it is 
			rather obvious that Sanat Kumara is the Adversary, then Bailey would 
			have done under the guise of love and wisdom what such great 
			Satanists as 
			Aleister Crowley did not attempt to do.  
			
			  
			
			Since Masters are produced by the occult 
			process of overshadowing and 'Bailey claims that the Master Jesus 
			established the Christian Church', then Bailey may have committed 
			the very serious Biblical sin of implying that
			 
			Jesus the Nazarene 
			was indwelt by a demon or satanic spirit.  
			
			  
			
			(For more evidence relative to the Bailey's "Christ," see section 
			7.)  
  
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			4. The Solar 
			Angels and Humanity 
			
			 
			The Bailey category of Deva (angels) has many subdivisions and these 
			subdivisions carry many names such as the greater or the lesser 
			Builders (4, p. 217).  
			
			  
			
			The greater Builders are categorized as the
			Solar Pitris (Hindu: semi-Divine deceased forefather), Agnishvattas, 
			(2, p. 679) and Fire Devas (2, p. 679).  
			
			  
			
			The lesser Builders are called such 
			things as the Lunar Pitris (2. p. 612-613). It will be noticed that 
			on page 682 of reference 2 (Exhibit 6 ) that Bailey has expanded H.P.B.'s terminology somewhat to include Solar Pitris as a Solar 
			Angel.  
			
			  
			
			Apparently H.P.B. considers Pitris only to be "Lunar" or a 
			lower aspect.  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Exhibit 6  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			It is much more important, however, to 
			consider H.P.B.'s terminology that appears in the footnote on page 
			614 of reference 2. (Exhibit 7) H.P.B. calls Solar Angels, Solar 
			Gods.  
			
			  
			
			They give humankind two "principles" the Lower mind and Higher 
			mind. 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Exhibit 7 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Then on page 950 of reference 2 (Exhibit 8), Bailey gives us 
			the exact description for the Solar Angels (i.e. Solar Gods) as 
			stated in the Secret Doctrine of H.P.B. They are the Fallen Angels. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Further, they are the 
			
			Serpents of Wisdom as well as having a nature 
			of Knowledge and Love.  
			
			  
			
			Once again observe that the ruler of the 
			"Humanity" department of the Planetary Hierarchy is Lucifer. 
			(Exhibit 9) 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Exhibit 8   
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Exhibit 9 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			For what purposes are the Fallen 
			Angels employed? We are told that, 
			
				
				"The work of the Agnishvattas 
				[Fallen Angels]... is to unit the higher three principles - atma, 
				buddhi, manas and the lower three, and thus become in very truth 
				the middle principle in man." (2, p. 681). [They give man the 
				"Higher Mind" (2, p. 614) and thus they work directly upon the 
				human beings "brain."]  
			 
			
			Bailey relates exactly how they 
			"benefit" humanity. 
			
				
				"As the Solar Gods descend ever 
				nearer to the physical plane, and their descent assume a 
				steadily increasing control of the lunar nature [lower mind], 
				the thoughts and desires of men are consequently purified and 
				refined... The Solar Angels blaze forth in all their glory... " 
				 
				
				(2, p. 951). 
			 
			
			[Note that Bailey often uses the term 
			"man" or "men" to mean mankind, male or female.] 
			 
			
			  
			
			These Fallen Angels 
			yield the Ego (2, p. 617) and thereby "redeem humanity" and "endow 
			him with human affections and aspirations." (2, footnote p. 951). Of 
			course, the Fallen Angels, as Scripturally defined, are demonic 
			spirits that can only endow mankind with Scripturally defined evil.
			 
			
			 
			Are the Fallen Angels related to Sanat Kumara? Bailey claims that 
			the Fallen Angels in the form of the greater Builders are related to 
			a specific Christian concept.  
			
				
				"From the Christian standpoint, the 
				greater Builders are the Holy spirit,... . " (2, p. 617). 
			 
			
			From a Scriptural viewpoint, this may be 
			the most evil correspondence an individual can make, equating the 
			Holy Spirit with demonic spirit beings.  
			
			  
			
			But, as will be discussed in 
			another Internet paper, this exceptional evil correspondence is 
			exactly what is being done today within the "psychic" community. In 
			her analogy to electricity, Bailey states that, 
			
				
				"The greater Builders 
			are the positive aspects... . "(2, p. 612).  
			 
			
			Relative to the entities called The 
			Brothers of Light, Bailey states that, 
			
				
				"The Brothers of Light co-operate 
				with the positive aspect in, and of, all forms - the building 
				devas of evolutionary intent - in order to bring about the 
				purposes of the Heavenly Man... ." (2, p. 615).  
			 
			
			Thus, translating the code words, one 
			has that demonic spirit beings work for Sanat Kumara (Satan), and 
			they perform Sanat Kumara's mental overshadowing of mankind.  
			
			 
			These and hundreds of other pieces of direct evidence lead to only 
			one conclusion. Bailey's theology is controlled completely by all of 
			the satanic aspects as they are described within the Scriptures. 
			Bailey, along with all of the followers of this theology, have an 
			immediate God which is the Adversary. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Bailey's telepathic control as well as 
			the entities that control the followers of this theology are demons. 
			 
			
			
			 
			Although Bailey attempts to hid the true identity of her "Christ," 
			the identity is now rather obvious. In the occult diagram of in 
			Exhibit 4, as with all such diagrams, the diagrammatically nearest 
			non-Kumara entity to "S" (Sanat Kumara) is always the most 
			significant. Notice that this entity is "B," Bailey's "Christ." If 
			the three entities had equal weight, they should be grouped along an 
			arc of a circle. 
			 
			
			  
			
			The Scriptures teach that the "closest" entity to 
			the Adversary and the entity that has not formally appeared, yet, in 
			its full earthly form is THE AntiChrist of Revelations. There is no 
			doubt that the true identity of Bailey's "Christ" is not as she has 
			described him but, rather, he is 
			
			the AntiChrist.  
			 
			Many individuals who do not believe that such spirit forms exist in 
			objective reality would pass off Bailey's claims as harmless if the 
			secular aspects of her "theology" are inconsistent with her 
			supernatural concepts. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Shortly, the material aspects of Bailey's 
			
			New 
			World Order will be investigated and it will be 
			determined whether or not her secularized "theology" is truly 
			harmless.
			 
			
			
			 
			Now that certain, but not all, Bailey code words have been 
			identified and in order not to mar Bailey's ingenious linguistic 
			techniques, within the Bailey quotations these code words or phrases 
			are indicated only by the {... } notation. 
			 
			
			  
			
			
			The actual Scriptural 
			meanings for these code words will then be given at the end of many 
			of the long quotations.  
			 
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			5. From 
			Bethlehem to Calvary 
			
			 
			If Christians with their usual amount of Scriptural knowledge were 
			to first read this 1937 book, they might be favorably impressed 
			through the first hundred pages.  
			 
			
			  
			
			Indeed, this is the very first 
			Bailey book I read since it is the only Bailey authored book in the 
			U. S. Naval Academy library and it is located in the section on 
			"religion." Fortunately, I began to observe certain Scriptural 
			errors. Now this book, it is claimed, was not dictated by Master D.K., who we are told does endorse it completely. 
			 
			Bailey utilizes every Scriptural and extrabiblical reference she can 
			in her attempt to show that
			 
			Jesus of Nazareth, the New testament 
			 
			Jesus, was not the only "Christ" manifested in the flesh, "Son of 
			God" or "Messenger" - a direct Scriptural contradiction if all of 
			the Scriptures are consulted. 
			 
			
			  
			
			For example, she writes on page 6,
			 
			
				
				"Yet St. Augustine tells us that 
				'that which is called the Christian religion existed among the 
				ancients, and never did not exist from the beginning of the 
				human race until {Christ} came in the flesh, at which time the 
				true religion, which already existed, began to be called 
				Christianity.' "  
				
				{Master Jesus} 
			 
			
			On page 8, Bailey writes,  
			
				
				"We know much of the exoteric 
				teaching. Orthodox and theological Christianity is founded on 
				it, as are all the orthodox formulations of the great 
				religions." 
			 
			
			Throughout this treatise, Bailey 
			continually uses the terms "Christ" and "God" and "Jesus" as if they 
			are, to her, one and the same entity.  
			
			  
			
			As shown above, this is a 
			deception on her part and a direct lie as to her true beliefs since 
			this book was written after she presented her true beliefs in her 
			other writings.  
			
			 
			What Bailey attempts, and others attempt even today, is to show that 
			Jesus of Nazareth went through five great episodes ("Birth, Baptism, 
			Transfiguration, Crucifixion, Resurrection") in order to become a 
			Master and only much later does Bailey call these episodes 
			'initiations'. "Their significance for us and their 
			're-interpretation' in modern terms is our task." (7, p. 15). This 
			quotation is our first strong clue as to Bailey's methods - methods 
			used by many cults that are present today - re-interpretation.  
			 
			Bailey claims that, 
			
				
				"The religion of Buddha, though preceding that of 
			{Christ}, expresses the same basic truths... ." (7, p. 19). {Master 
				Jesus}  
			 
			
			Then some strange comments begin to creep into her 
			introduction.  
			
				
				"The story of {Christ's} birth at 
				Bethlehem can be paralleled in practically every detail in the 
				lives of earlier messengers from God." (7, p. 21).  
				
				{Master Jesus} 
			 
			
			We then discover exactly what Bailey 
			considers the "kingdom of God."  
			
				
				She writes on page 45, "This world 
				is the kingdom of {God}." {Satan}  
				
				Then on page 54, Bailey writes, "... 
				and He had been preceded by other great {Sons of God}." 
				{Masters}  
			 
			
			Bailey continues along this same line 
			attempting to show that Jesus the Nazarene is simply an overshadowed 
			disciple of Bailey's "{Christ}" [the indwelling spirit being Satan, 
			the AntiChrist or Master Jesus depending upon context] as was 
			Buddha, Bailey claims. 
			 
			
			  
			
			But, we now come to the remarkable statement
			 
			
				
				"... before the advent of 
				Christianity men recognized Him [Bailey's "AntiChrist" concept 
				produced by Satanic overshadowing] as the beloved Krishna of the 
				Hindu faith... ." (7, p. 83). 
			 
			
			Checking out a dictionary yields the 
			following: "Krishna. In Hindu mythology, the eighth son of Visnu" 
			and a picture of this idol God is shown (8, p. 1009, Sup. p. 65). 
			
			  
			
			Further along in this treatise, we find 
			the interesting statement that, 
			
				
				"The majority of these great {Sons of 
				God} were curiously enough, born in a cave and usually of a virgin 
			mother." (7, p. 100). {Masters} "All of them 'descended into hell 
			and rose again on the third day'." (7, p. 102).  
			 
			
			Bailey claims that "Zarathustra," 
			Buddha, Krishna and other Sons of God behaved exactly as {Jesus} did 
			during their life times. {Master Jesus} 
			 
			Bailey continues to prepare the way 
			for yet more startling conclusions.  
			
				
				"{Christ} stands alone because He 
				was the greatest, the highest and truest that has ever appeared, 
				but not because - dare I say it? - He was the greatest that ever 
				could appear. One dare not so limit {God }." (7, p. 157). 
				 
				
				"{Christ} has given us the highest 
				and the most inclusive revelation... . But how shall we dare to 
				say that no more is possible to {God}, when we are ready to 
				receive it?" (7, p. 158). "...  
				  
				
				'the {Christ} was one of the long 
				line of manifesting {Sons of God}'." (7, p. 332).  
				  
				
				"... Many men have died violent 
				deaths. In this, {Christ} was in no wise different from 
				thousands of other far-seeing men and reformers down the ages. 
				In none of these respects was {Christ} really unique." (7, p. 
				366).  
				  
				
				"History tells us many of these 
				{Sons of God} died and rose again, and finally ascended into 
				Heaven." (7, p. 414).  
				  
				
				"Purification of the self leads one 
				up to the portal of initiation, and then one can tread the Way, 
				the Way that {Christ} trod from Bethlehem to Calvary." (7, p. 
				482).  
				  
				
				{God = Satan} {Christ = Master 
				Jesus} {Sons of God = Masters} 
			 
			
			One can immediately determine from these 
			last quotations that the Adversary controlled completely the mind of 
			Bailey.  
			
			  
			
			You might also recognize statements that Bailey has made 
			that form a portion of other so-called "Christian" doctrines. 
			Indeed, this one book has many contributions to make to this 
			investigation, but rather than to continue in this piecemeal manner, 
			it seems much better to consider certain categories separately.  
			
			  
			
			In 
			so doing, we will often begin each category with quotations taken 
			from Bailey's 
			
			From Bethlehem to Calvary even though it was written 
			after she developed and wrote down most of her basic doctrine.  
  
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			6. Methodology 
			and The Kingdom of God 
			
			 
			What possible method could Bailey apply in order to substantiate her 
			conclusions?  
			
			  
			
			The method is the well-known process of 
			're-interpretation of Scriptural concepts and dialectic argument'. 
			 
			
			  
			
			First, let us recall one of the major concepts within basic Christian doctrine - The 
			Kingdom of God - a concept that Bailey 
			completely reverses.  
			
				
				"As depicted in the preaching of 
				Jesus, the kingdom of God may be characterized as being opposed 
				to everything present and earthly, to everything here and now. 
				It is absolutely miraculous... . Man can therefore, neither 
				hasten the coming of the kingdom of God by doing battle with 
				God's enemies (as the Zealots hoped) nor force it to appear by 
				scrupulous observations of the law (as the Pharisees hoped).
				 
				  
				
				He can only await its coming in 
				patience and confidence... . This kingdom is coming in the form 
				of a cosmic catastrophe... . The facts that the kingdom is the 
				gift of God... . The kingdom of God is utterly transcendent and 
				supernatural: it comes from above, from God alone." (10, p. 
				385-386). 
			 
			
			Now what does Bailey claim is the 
			kingdom of God?  
			
				
				"'This world is the kingdom of 
				{God}'..."( 7, p. 45).  
				  
				
				"It is time that the Church woke up 
				to its mission which is to materialize the kingdom of {God} on 
				earth, today, here and now." (7, p. 369).  
				  
				
				"People are no longer interested in 
				a possible heavenly state or probable hell. They need to learn 
				that the 'kingdom is here, and must express itself on earth'... 
				." (7, p. 370).  
				  
				
				"But {Christ} founded a kingdom on 
				earth... ." (7, p. 501).  
				  
				
				"'We can produce, and as a race give 
				birth to, the next kingdom in nature, which {Christ} called the 
				kingdom of {God}'... ." (7, p. 454).  
				  
				
				"... the question, however, arises 
				whether we may hasten the process... so expedite matters that 
				the kingdom and its laws may hold sway earlier than would 
				otherwise be the case." (7, p. 483).  
				  
				
				"However, it is possible to hasten 
				the coming of the kingdom... ." (7, p. 485).  
				  
				
				"'The true Church is the kingdom of 
				{God} on earth'... ." (7, p. 487).  
				  
				
				"How will this condition of {God's} 
				kingdom materialize on earth?" (7, p. 489).  
				  
				
				"... {Christ} certainly opened the 
				door into the kingdom, 'the rest of the work rests upon our 
				shoulders';..." (7, p. 491).  
				  
				
				"'{He} came to found the kingdom of 
				{God } on earth'... ." (7, p. 505).  
				  
				
				"The kingdom is now organized on 
				earth...." (7, p. 505).  
				  
				
				{God = Satan} {Christ, He = Master 
				Jesus} 
			 
			
			Is this kingdom of God on earth simply a 
			momentary aberration or has it become a continuing theme? In 1946, 
			Bailey takes the following dictation from her control Master D.K.
			 
			
				
				"... the long-awaited 'kingdom of 
				{God} is simply the appearance of soul-{controlled} men on earth 
				in everyday life and at all stages of that {control}'." (6, p. 
				588).  
				  
				
				"... when the facts of the presence 
				on earth... of the Kingdom of {God} will be accepted:... ." (6, 
				p. 589).  
				  
				
				"... the eternal existence of the 
				kingdom of {God} on earth is established." (6, p. 561). 
				 
				  
				
				[In 1947, we have] "... to make 
				public the already existent Kingdom of {God}." (6, p. 661).
				 
				  
				
				{God = Satan} {control = demon 
				control} 
			 
			
			In Oct. 1982, the Lucis Trust 
			supplied (free of charge) this investigator with a long list of 
			pamphlets and booklets.  
			
			  
			
			What do these say about this kingdom of God 
			on earth?  
			
				
				"The bringing of the kingdom of 
				{God}, the preparation for the coming {Christ} and salvaging of 
				mankind... ." (SH, p. 8).  
				  
				
				"The {Christ} stands in patient 
				silence, attentive to the effort that will make {His} work 
				materialize on Earth..." (ROC, p. 3).  
				  
				
				"Let us forget distance, remoteness 
				and vagueness and realize that we are talking of 'exact and 
				literal happenings on our planet'." (ROC, p. 12).  
				  
				
				"... and finally the self-evident 
				truth that 'only through humanity itself can the divine {Plan} 
				work out'." (TMW, p. 10).  
				  
				
				"It then sums it all up in the 
				clarion words: 'Let Light and Love and Power restore the Plan on 
				Earth.' Always the emphasis is laid upon the place of appearance 
				and of manifestation: the earth." (GI, p. 14). 
				  
				
				 {God = Satan} {Christ, His = 
				AntiChrist} {Plan = Satanic Plan} 
			 
			
			And the same ideas are repeated over and 
			over again.  
			
			  
			
			Before continuing the methodology of Bailey, it might be 
			better at this moment to discover additional information about the 
			Bailey meanings for the terms love and evil. Recall that the Fallen 
			Angels have a nature of Knowledge and Love. This in itself is a 
			significant characterization for the term "love."  
			
			  
			
			Any additional information will aid us 
			greatly as we continue to discuss the "Plan" and the other concepts 
			that Bailey employs. We will return shortly to other Scriptural 
			re-interpretations and Bailey's use of dialectic argument. 
  
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			7. The New Age 
			[Bailey's] Ethics 
			
			 
			Throughout most of Bailey's writings the term "love" is in continual 
			use.  
			
			  
			
			One consistent meaning for Bailey's "love" concept is that is 
			manifests itself in "service to humanity." Are these Bailey concepts 
			consistent with our previous code word identifications? 
			 
			With respect to service, Bailey emphases the New Group of World 
			Servers. This group is the major element of the "Plan." Often the 
			terms used to describe the service this group will "lovingly" supply 
			are general rather than specific in character. It seems that all 
			individuals will be placed into two categories.  
			
			  
			
			Those who will not 
			be members of this elite group of World Servers are, 
			
				
				"... those people who, clinging to 
				'reactionary methods of finding and expressing truth, prefer 
				obedience to authority' to clear thinking and self-imposed 
				guidance of their own {soul}."  
				
				{demon controlled soul} 
			 
			
			You can easily determine from what 
			follows in this investigation that the term '"reactionary" refers to 
			all of the methods and processes used within, at the least, 
			fundamental Judeo-Christine doctrine'.  
			
			  
			
			The "authority" accepted by 
			individuals who will not be members of the 
			
			New Group of World 
			Servers is the authority of religious doctrine such as the Bible. 
			
			 
			Then we have those who will populate this new, never before, 
			existing group.  
			
				
				"... those who, while affirming the 
				fundamental {truths} by which humanity has evolved, are 
				'sensitive to {soul} impression', and recognize that response to 
				human need and spiritual {unfoldment} are determining factors 
				which lead humanity into a new age of peace and plenty." (NGWS, 
				p. 3).  
				  
				
				{truths = Satanic truths} {soul = 
				demonic} {unfoldment = demonic unfoldment} 
			 
			
			Remember that Bailey's 'initiation 
			process, where an ordinary human being can become a Master or even a 
			Godlike spirit being' much like Sanat Kumara, is modeled on the 
			physical theory of evolution.  
			
			  
			
			Note the not yet identified terms 
			peace and plenty. But what does Bailey's control consider as 
			"peace"? The world servers must "... 'repudiate violently the 
			unproven'." (NGWS, p. 3).  
			
			  
			
			The term violently, as will be seen, 
			means very violently and the term unproven refers to anything that 
			might be accepted on faith such as a supernatural kingdom of God. 
			Indeed, the "plenty" will only go to the New Group of World Servers 
			and "peace" will be maintained by the most violent of means. Members 
			of this group must also have goodwill and foster right human 
			relations.  
			
			  
			
			The concept of what are "right human 
			relations" is not directly but only indirectly defined within 
			Bailey's writings. As it will be demonstrated, such relations are 
			those that are to be dictated by the AntiChrist.  
			
			  
			
			This fact is shown 
			by what is considered the most important characteristic for 
			
			the 
			leaders of the New Group of World Servers.  
			
				
				"They can be regarded as the 
				embodiment of the emerging kingdom of {God} on earth, but it 
				should be remembered that 'this kingdom is not a Christian 
				kingdom'... ." (NGWS, p.5). {Satan} 
			 
			
			Additional characteristics for members 
			of the New Group of World Servers can be found in the Lucis Trust 
			booklet with this title. There are different subgroups within this 
			group.  
			
			  
			
			First, we seem to have a description for the leaders.  
			
				
				"... they 'embrace all religions, 
				all science and all philosophy'. Their characteristics are 
				synthesis, 'inclusiveness', intellectuality, and fine mental 
				development... . They 'recognize no authority save that of their 
				own {souls}'." (NGWS, p. 7).  
				
				{demon controlled souls} 
			 
			
			Note the code word inclusiveness. This 
			means that they all follow, in complete subservience, the dictates 
			of the AntiChrist. Indeed, they probably have no choice in the 
			matter. Now the next in line of service use the methods of secular 
			mind control.  
			
			  
			
			They  
			
				
				"... are the intellectual, highly 
				educated men and women... They utilize all the known methods 
				to reach the general public. They 'stir the middle class to 
				activity and, through them, arouse the masses'." (NGW, p. 6).
				 
			 
			
			These methods and, indeed, the very 
			wording of this quotation should be very familiar to you.  
			
			 
			As pointed out above, one of the most important terms used within 
			these Bailey descriptions is the term "inclusiveness." 
			 
			
			  
			
			Inclusiveness 
			is the absolute of Bailey's, 
			
				
				"right human relations" and 
				characterizes her concept of "love." "... a spirit of love 
				(which is a spirit of inclusiveness... .)" (7, p. 469). 
				 
			 
			
			The antithesis to this concept is 
			represented by the term separateness.  
			
			  
			
			This 'concept of separativenss is, to 
			Bailey, the highest of all of the evils'. Bailey has a great deal to 
			say as to what is not to be considered as evil today. 
			
			  
			
			In fact, as 
			certain quotations will indicate, the "evils" described in 
			Judeo-Christian doctrine are no longer evil within Bailey's New Age 
			ethics.  
			
				
				"Our interpretation of sin and its 
				penalty has been at fault... ." (7, p. 343).  
				  
				
				"Christianity has produced such sad, 
				weary, and sin-conscious men." (7, p. 345).  
				  
				
				"Theology over-reached itself with 
				its 'miserable sinner' complex and its emphasis upon the 
				necessity for purification by blood." (7, p. 336).  
				  
				
				"But we have been so preoccupied 
				with the subject of sin that we have forgotten 'our 
				divinity';... " (7, p. 330).  
				  
				
				"The question of evil is too large 
				to elucidate at length, but it might be defined simply as 
				adherence to 'that which we should have outgrown, the grasping 
				of that which we should have left behind'." (7, p. 354). 
				 
			 
			
			Thus, to Bailey, 'there are no longer 
			any absolutes relative to sin'. Hence, 'no basic behavior 
			requirements as stated in Judeo-Christian and other religious 
			doctrine'. This idea is prevalent today [1997] with many so-called 
			Christian group; "we have evolved and we should have outgrown these 
			sin concepts." 
			 
			
			 
			As to the concept of "separation," Bailey writes  
			
				
				"When we are 'separative in our 
				attitudes' or 'do anything which produces separation', we are 
				transgressing a fundamental law of {God}." (7, p. 355). 
				 
				  
				
				"It is the sense of separateness, 
				this emphasis upon 'personal and individual good, which is the 
				nature of sin'." (7, p. 356).  
				  
				
				"Separateness is hatred, 
				aloneness 
				and division." (7, p. 356). {God = Satan} 
			 
			
			One might wonder how an emphasis upon 
			personal and individual good could ever be considered as sin? 
			 
			
			  
			
			This 
			is directly counter to the Declaration of Independence of the United 
			States is it not? Indeed, in order to entice many to accept her 
			theology, many statements that appear in the free booklets 
			contradict this specific meaning for Bailey's term "separateness."
			 
			
			 
			The "freedoms" we have of association is termed as "separateness" by 
			Bailey's demon control. Any personal "rights" that might separate 
			one from the control of Bailey's God and anything that would alter 
			an individual's complete unwavering allegiance to Bailey's God is 
			separateness. 
			
			 
			We now have the basic meaning for Bailey's code word "separateness" 
			and when this code word is used you should refer back to this basic 
			meaning.  
			
			 
			Shortly, using Bailey's own words, we will discover what Bailey 
			considers the 'worst form of separateness - the following of 
			fundamental Judeo-Christian doctrine'.  
			
			  
			
			But, first it seems that 
			Bailey's control may have had some difficulty in defining the term 
			"love;" a term she uses thousands of time.  
			
				
				"The expression of divine love is 
				still in the making; the world is not yet full of love and few 
				there are who understand the true meaning of the word. But - 
				speaking symbolically - when 
				
				the United Nations has emerged into 
				factual and actual power, the welfare of the world will then be 
				assured. What is that welfare but love in action?" 
				 
				
				(ROC, p. 9).
				 
			 
			
			The United Nations plays an very 
			important role in Master D.K.'s plan for it is from this or similar 
			platforms that the satanic "Plan" is to be presented and controlled.
			 
			
			 
			Now it is by examining Bailey's concept of evil that the true 
			meanings of such terms as love, goodwill, service and right human 
			relations can be ascertained. In 1937, Bailey made a comment about 
			the coming conflict in Europe.  
			
			  
			
			You will notice that her control 
			considers this conflict a "right and good" thing.  
			
				
				"The disintegration in the world at 
				this time is right and good, provided we understand why it is 
				taking place and by what it should be succeeded. 'Destruction, 
				that is carried on with a view to eventual construction is right 
				and proper... some ideas must exist as to subsequent 
				reconstruction.'" (7, p. 463).  
			 
			
			Master D.K. even calls this 
			'destruction-construction' concept 'The Principle of Conflict' and 
			the results produce 'The Ray of Harmony through Conflict'.(1, p. 
			623). 
			
			 
			Now what I am about to relate may be difficult to believe and even 
			more difficult to read. As is well-known, probably the greatest 
			event in modern Bible prophesy since 70 A. D. is the official return 
			of the Jews to Palestine in May 1948.  
			
			  
			
			There is no doubt that this 
			one event would be highly repugnant to Bailey's controlling force 
			since it would clearly indicate the beginning of its end.  
			
			  
			
			On the 
			other hand, if individuals doubt the existence of such supernatural 
			forces, then I feel they would be hard pressed to account for what I 
			am about to relate. What appears next is, from Bailey's viewpoint, 
			one of the most evil examples of "separateness" that has ever 
			occurred. Bailey wrote many of these quotations in 1948. (1, p. 
			620).  
			
			  
			
			Research indicates that other portions 
			were written, at the least, during the period from March 1946 - 
			March 1949.  
			
				
				"The Poles and the Irish are prime 
				'catalysts of conflict' and are constantly instigating 
				difficulties between peoples.... 'Today the Jewish people are 
				engineering trouble', and it is interesting to note that the 
				main contention in the past of Poland, lately of the Irish, and 
				today of the Jews, is territory, thus evidencing a most 
				distorted sense of values....  
				  
				
				They [the Jews] were also, during 
				the years immediately following the war [World War II], under 
				the control of a glamour imposed by the Zionist Dictators, who 
				were attempting (somewhat unsuccessfully) to be to the Jewish 
				people what Stalin and his group, and Hitler and his gang, have 
				been to their people... They worked through the same methods - 
				terrorizing, withholding information, browbeating their 
				opponents, making false claims and bribing and corrupting... 
				  
				
				They are claiming a land to which 
				they have no possible right... . 'The Jew has ever been (could 
				he but usefully remember it) the symbol of humanity - evolving, 
				seeking, restless, materialistic, 'separative' and greedy'." (1, 
				p. 634-635) 
			 
			
			As to The Holocaust, Bailey's demon 
			control 
			down plays the significance of this most evil of events. 
			
				
				"The Jewish people... ; they forget 
				that millions in the world today have suffered as they have 
				suffered and that - for instance - there are eighty per cent of 
				other people in the concentration camps of Europe and only 
				twenty per cent Jews... I have enlarged thus upon the Jewish 
				conflict because it is the symbol of all past conflicts in human 
				history, based upon universal selfishness and the greed of 
				undeveloped humanity,.." (1, p. 635).  
				  
				
				"Now they [the United Nations] have 
				made another [mistake].... for it is the American Jews who have 
				created the situation, with relatively little help or 
				endorsement from Jews of other nations. The United States... 
				have thrown the weight of their influence into the conflict on 
				the side of aggression and of territorial theft.  
				
				  
				
				They could have 
				worked for the Principle of Harmony and permitted time and the 
				non-'separativeness' of the nations to adjust and solve the 
				Jewish problem." (1, p. 636).  
			 
			
			In the next quotations, you will 
			discover that Bailey's control 'approves of the teachings of Marx 
			and Lenin but not how their teachings have been implemented' in 
			Russia.  
			
			  
			
			This proves that Sanat Kumara is not all knowing since in 
			1981 it was irrefutably demonstrated that combining Marxism with any 
			supernatural philosophy, including Bailey's, would yield a highly 
			overtly inconsistent, contradictory and dangerous philosophy that 
			would be overthrown (11). [Indeed, as is well-know, this 1982 
			prediction has occurred.]  
			
			  
			
			Also we have the introduction of two new 
			code phases - 'the Great White Lodge that aids in the 
			externalization of Bailey's theology and the Black Lodge that 
			attempts to externalize the precepts of the Judeo-Christian and 
			similar doctrine'.  
			
				
				"The major battle in the word today 
				is that of the freedom of the average citizen to think for 
				himself and to come to his own decisions and conclusions. [This 
				is logically inconsistent with other Bailey statements relative 
				to separateness and appears to be used only as a deceitful 
				appeal to human pride.] 
				
				  
				
				It is here that the major quarrel 
				between the {Great White Lodge} and the {Black Lodge} is to be 
				found. It is a battle in which humanity itself is the decisive 
				factor, and for this reason the {Black Lodge} is working through 
				the group which is controlling the destiny of Russia and also 
				through the Zionist movement.  
				  
				
				The leaders of the U. S. S. R. are 
				working intelligently and potently against human freedom and 
				particularly against freedom of thought. Communism per se has no 
				such objective;...Zionism today stands for aggression and for 
				the use of force, and the keynote is permission to take what you 
				want irrespective of other people or their inalienable rights." 
				(1, p. 679-680).  
			 
			
			Of course, as demonstrated, it is 
			'Bailey's God that actually wants to take these rights away from the 
			individual'.  
			
				
				"The true communistic platform is 
				sound; it is brotherhood in action and it does not - in its 
				original platform - run counter to the spirit of the {Christ}." 
				(1, p. 680).  
				
				{AntiChrist}  
			 
			
			Bailey then says that people have 
			interpreted the writings of Marx and Lenin incorrectly for their own 
			gain and this is, 
			
				
				"just as the 'theologians of 
				
				the Church interpret the words of 
				Christ [Jesus], which has no relation to {His} original intention'." 
			(1, p. 680).  
				  
				
				"The leaders of the Zionist movement 
				of aggression constitute a real danger to world peace and human 
				development and their activities have been endorsed by the 
				expediency policy of the U. S. A.... It is the Zionists who have 
				defied the United Nations, lowered its prestige and made its 
				position both negative and negligible to the world.... These 
				activities [returning to a homeland in Palestine] run counter to 
				all the plans of the spiritual Hierarchy and mark a point of 
				triumph of the forces of evil." (1, p. 681).  
				
				{Master Jesus} 
			 
			
			As it is slowly being demonstrated, 
			'that which the Bible considers as "good" and "proper" Bailey's 
			control considers as evil, and that which Bailey's control considers 
			as "good" and "proper" the Bible considers as evil'.  
			
			  
			
			In fact, to 
			Bailey's control Master D.K., the evil presented by the Jews return 
			to the Holy Land, or what is called "isolated separativeness" is the 
			supreme portion of the ultimate evil - cosmic evil.  
			
				
				"The true nature of cosmic evil 
				finds its major expression in wrong thinking, false values and the supreme evil of materialistic selfishness 
				and the sense of isolated 'separativeness'." (1, p. 753) 
			 
			
			Master D.K. introduces the code phrase 
			'seal the door where Evil Dwells'.  
			
				
				'The sealing is to be done 
			violently.'  
			 
			
			This demon not only advocates that the 'door be closed 
			on the Jews', but begins to allude to the same 'cosmic evil as being 
			present in the Christian Church'.  
			
			  
			
			What is most certain, however, is 
			that Satan, as stated through Master D.K. and all other members of 
			the Hierarchy, hated Judaism prior to May 1948.  
			
			  
			
			In the section entitled 
			
			The Hidden 
			Source of the Outer Turmoil (January 1939) of the book
			
			The Externalization of the Hierarchy the Jews are again attacked. 
			
				
				"... you can come to an 
				understanding of the Jew, his 'separateness', his desire for 
				racial purity and his interest in that which is commercial and 
				tangible.  
				
				  
				
				The Jew, down the ages, has insisted upon being 
				'separated' from all other races but he brought over from the 
				previous system the knowledge (necessary then but obsolete now) 
				that his race was the 'chosen people.' "  
				
				(6, p. 77).  
			 
			
			Notice that the 'knowledge presented in 
			the Old Testament is now, according to Bailey, "obsolete."'  
			
			  
			
			The 
			conservative Christian Church takes on the characteristics of the 
			Black Lodge, in Bailey's view.  
			
			  
			
			With respect to the New World Religion, 
			we have the following remarks.  
			
				
				"1. The reorganization of the world 
				religions - if in any way possible - so that 'their out-of-date 
				theologies, their narrow-minded emphasis and their ridiculous 
				belief that they know what is in the Mind of God' may be offset, 
				in order that the churches may eventually be the recipients of 
				spiritual inspiration.  
				  
				
				2. 'The gradual dissolution - again 
				if in any way possible - of the orthodox Jewish faith, with its 
				obsolete teaching', its 'separative' emphasis, its hatred of the 
				Gentiles and its failure to recognize the {Christ}." (6, p. 
				544).  
				  
				
				"That 
				
				the 'Vatican cease its 
				political scheming, its exploitation of the masses and its 
				emphasis upon ignorance' is as important; that the manifold 
				'divisions of the Protestant churches be bridged' is 
				imperative." (6, p. 545).  
				
				{Master Jesus} 
			 
			
			I point out that it will soon be 
			demonstrated that the phrase Bailey uses "in any way possible" means 
			by every possible and violent means.  
			
			  
			
			Of course, we also have major 
			discussions as to the "Plan" that, when coupled with the above 
			quotations, indicates what Christianity is not considered to be. 
			 
			
				
				"The establishing, by all means available, of right human 
			relations."  
				
				(6, p. 546).  
			 
			
			In 1946 and as part of the "Plan," Master D.K. continues through 
			Bailey to state, when the New World Religion is discussed, why the 
			Jews should be eliminated. 
			
				
				"2. The Gradual Dissolution of 
				Orthodox Judaism. Reason.  
				
					
					a. Because of its presentation of a 
					
					wrathful Jehovah, 'caring only for his chosen people. This is a 
				basic evil.' The Lord of the World, the {God} in whom we live 
				and move and have our being is totally otherwise.  
					
					b. Because of 
				its 'separateness'. c. Because it is so ancient that its 
				teachings are largely obsolete." (6, p. 551).  
				 
				
				{Satan} 
			 
			
			Bailey's demons continue to escalate 
			their attacks upon the Christian Churches that do not accept 
			Bailey's form of non-Christian ecumenicalism. First, we have the 
			emphasis on separateness.  
			
				
				"Basic cleavages and 'separateness' 
				unrecognized 500 years ago is now recognized as harmful, and 
				remedies are sought."  
				
				(SH, p. 6).  
				
				  
				
				"The spiritual awakening of 
				men everywhere (within or without the worlds faiths, and largely 
				outside of them)... ."  
				
				(ROC, p. 5).  
			 
			
			Further, we have Bailey's description of 
			the New World Religion,  
			
				
				The Reorganization of the World 
				Religions. Reasons. a. 'To make way for the World Religion, 
				universal religion'. c. To 'rid the world of theology and 
				ecclesiasticism'." (6, p. 551).  
				  
				
				"Because having a religious basis 
				[the next world war], the hate involved would be far greater 
				than anything hitherto known." (6, p. 552).  
				  
				
				"This second group [of World 
				Servers] will implement this new religion; by the time they come 
				into control the old theological activities will have been 
				completely broken; Judaism will be fast disappearing; Buddhism 
				will be spreading and becoming increasing dogmatic; Christianity 
				will be in a state of chaotic division and upheavals."  
				
				(6, p. 
				573).  
				  
				
				"... 'offset the scheming of 
				reactionary and conservative politicians and churchmen', and 
				teach the young of the age the 'new modes of living indicating 
				to them the better values'..."  
				
				(6, p. 576) 
			 
			
			Notice the use of the term 
			"conservative." Further, these so-called "better values" are not 
			those found in a conservative interpretation of the Scriptures.
			 
			
			 
			Master D.K. continues with his denouncements.  
			
				
				"... this same orthodox Christian 
				will find it increasingly difficult to induce the intelligent 
				masses of people to accept the 'impossible Deity and feeble 
				Christ [Jesus] which historical Christianity has endorsed'." (6, 
				p. 590).  
				  
				
				"... these people will 'not tolerate 
				authoritarianism in any Church' [such as the authority of the 
				Bible]... (6, p. 618).  
				
				  
				
				"... 'defeat of all that which infringes 
				human free will and which keeps humanity in ignorance; 
				it applies equally to any established system - Catholic or 
				Protestant -'... ." (6, p. 701).  
			 
			
			Let me now close this section with two 
			quotations that characterizes absolutely Bailey's basic evil. I note 
			that another code word for her theology is 'Christ consciousness'. 
			Of course, her "Christ" is the AntiChrist and this means 
			'overshadowing for the purpose of embedding Satanic concepts'. 
			
			  
			
			In 
			the next quotation, more of what Bailey considers to be absolute 
			evil is identified; equating her "Christ" with the Scriptural 
			Jesus Christ.  
			
				
				"Why this triumph of the {Christ 
				consciousness} must always be spoken of in terms of religion of 
				church-going or orthodox belief is one of the incredible 
				triumphs of the forces of evil." (ROC, p. 11) 
			 
			
			This continues the theme that her 
			"Christ" is not the same as the Christ concept of 
			Judeo-Christian 
			doctrine.  
			
			  
			
			But, how is her demon control going to control the forces 
			of "evil," and exactly who or what are they? What is the material 
			Power that Sanat Kumara is going to evoke?  
			
			  
			
			He tells us that, 
			
				
				"The atomic bomb emerged from the 
				first ray Ashram, working in conjunction with a fifth ray group 
				[scientists]... its intent was and is purely beneficent. As a 
				means in the hands of the United Nations to enforce the outer 
				forms of peace and on the growth of goodwill to take effect...  
				
				  
				
				It belongs to the United Nations for use (or let us rather hope, 
				simply for threatened use), when aggressive action on the part 
				of any nation rears its ugly head. It does not essentially 
				matter... whether it is generated by political groups of any 
				powerful religious organization such as 
				
				the Church of Rome..."  
				
				(6, p. 548). 
			 
			
			These statements are so immediately 
			clear that they need little further illumination. 
			
			  
			
			I suppose that if 
			atomic weapons are not available, then other such 'violent means 
			will be employed'. It is not necessary that one assume that this 
			specific means will be the "Power" used only that violent means of 
			one sort or another will be utilized.  
			
			  
			
			Of great importance to Bailey's control 
			is the use of violent means for purification, purification which her 
			control describes.  
			
			  
			
				
				"Shamballa Force. 
				
				  
				
				1. The Energy of Purification....It 
				involves the elimination of all that hinders the nature of 
				divinity from full expression.  
				
				2. The Energy of Destruction. This 
				is a destruction which removes or changes the forms which 
				imprison the inner spiritual life and hide the inner {soul} 
				{light}." (Sham.).  
				  
				
				{soul = demon controlled soul} 
				{light = Luciferian enlightenment}  
			 
			
			I feel that no additional quotations 
			with respect to Bailey's wish to destroy certain church 
			organizations is necessary. 'Being a Jew or being a member of any 
			"church" body different from her New World Religion, or not 
			following in any fashion Bailey's teachings adds additional content 
			to the code word separateness.'  
			
			  
			
			The first article that appears in the 
			July-August (1982) issue of the "Beacon" journal (founded by Bailey 
			in 1922) is entitled, The Greatest Heresy. 
			 
			
				
				"The Ageless Wisdom 
			teaching informs us, in no uncertain terms, that 'separation' is the 
			greatest heresy, or evil, from which the most serious world problems 
			spring." 
			 
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			8. The 
			Greatest Dangers 
			
				
				'Bailey takes advantage of many human weaknesses.' 
				 
			 
			
			In fact, it is 
			explicitly stated that the controlling demons of 
			
			the New World Order 
			will take advantage of these human weaknesses.  
			
				
				"The gullibility of the average 
				citizen, his willingness to accept what is told him if it is 
				said loudly enough and with sufficient force is well-known. Mass 
				psychology and mob determination have been exploited down the 
				age... . But this negative receptivity can be easily turned to 
				good ends as bad." (SH, p. 8).  
			 
			
			Then we have that 
			within the New World Religion "pagan" festivals play an important 
			role.  
			
			  
			
			Of course, this is justified since some of today's so-called 
			Christian festivals were originally pagan in character. 
			
				
				"... new world religion emphasizing 
				the three major spiritual festivals at the time of Aries, Taurus 
				and Gemini full moon periods and nine lesser festivals." (TMW, 
				p. 11).  
				  
				
				"The Wesek Festival is the festival 
				of the Buddha and is held each year at the time of the full moon 
				of May or more correctly the full moon in the sign of Taurus." 
				(ROC, p. 7).  
			 
			
			We now come to the greatest dangers of 
			all. Bailey's demon 
			control 'takes complete advantage of the "prideful" nature of 
			mankind and exploits it absolutely'.  
			
				
				"We are human beings, but we are 
				also divine." (7, p. 482).  
				  
				
				"'If there is really a God-man, 
				there is also a Man-God',... ." (7, p. 482).  
				  
				
				"... 'man is divine'." (7, p. 459). 
			 
			
			Bailey concentrates upon the assumed 
			sinless (in her sense of sin, I suppose) Godlike qualities of all 
			human beings throughout every piece of her writings.  
			
			  
			
			Repeatedly she 
			dismisses the Scripturally described sin concept and states that 
			"'you will be like God'" exactly as stated by the serpent in Gen 3:5 
			(NIV). Moreover, 'group meditation and absolute mind control will be 
			fostered'.  
			
			  
			
			All of this is outlined in the booklets 
			entitled Meditation at the Full Moon, The Science of Meditation, and 
			Techniques of Goodwill handbook pages 31 - 35. These booklets appear 
			on the 1982 literature selection received from the Lucis Trust and 
			may be obtained free-of-charge from their various offices. I should 
			also mention one other important aspect of the New World Order - 
			The 
			New Astrology. But, I need not give any details of this aspect since 
			it actually contains nothing new.  
			
			  
			
			A vast number of individuals have the 
			impression that Bailey's Christ is Jesus Christ. As an 
			example, in reference 3 on page 54, one can find a brief biography 
			of Alice A. Bailey. The writer of this biography leads one to 
			believe that Bailey's Christ is, indeed, Jesus Christ. He writes, 
			"... the figure Christ continued to play a central part of her 
			beliefs."  
			
			
			 
			Thus far, many examples of the ingenious ways Bailey has 
			re-interpreted Scriptural concepts and used dialectic argument have 
			been presented, but a few more examples will definitely be 
			beneficial. 
			 
			
			  
			
			
			With regard to the return of Jesus Christ, where 
			the Scriptures state the exact manner he will return, Bailey writes,
			 
			
				
				"The symbolic prophecies found in 
				all the world scriptures anent this imminent event will prove 
				their veracity; their symbolism will nevertheless elicit 
				re-interpretation; circumstances and happenings will not 
				necessarily be exactly as the Scriptures would appear to 
				indicate." (ROC, p.7).  
				  
				
				"He will come indeed in the 'clouds 
				of the air'... means little to our modern civilization." (ROC, 
				p. 7).  
				  
				
				"'He does not come as the omnipotent 
				God of man's ignorant creation', but as the '{Christ} the 
				founder of the Kingdom of {God} on Earth'... ."(ROC, p. 12).
				 
				  
				
				"The generally accepted idea that He 
				will return as a triumphant warrior, omnipotent and irresistible 
				has surely no basis in fact." (ROC, p. 13).  
				  
				
				"That the circumstances of {His} 
				return are only symbolically related to the world scriptures; 
				this may produce a vital change in perceived ideas of humanity." 
				(ROC, p. 14).  
				  
				
				"All this will not come as the 
				result of some proclamation or some stupendous planetary event 
				which will force human beings everywhere to say : 'Lo: He is 
				there! Lo: Here are the signs of His divinity!' for that would 
				evoke only antagonism and laughter, resistance or fanatical 
				credulity." (ROC, p. 8).  
				  
				
				{God = Satan} {Christ, His = 
				AntiChrist} 
			 
			
			Master D.K. tells us the actual plans 
			for Bailey's "Christ" to return will not, 
			
				
				"... produce the wild claims and the 
				credulous recognition of the well-meaning and the 
				'unintelligent' as is so frequently the case today [~1948] nor 
				will someone appear and say 'This is the Christ. He is here or 
				He is there.' " (ROC, p. 9). 
			 
			
			After Bailey's "Christ" establishes 
			"goodwill" and "right" human relations [the Scripturally defined 
			evil concept] on earth, the D.K. tell us,  
			
				
				"Then His task will be done: He 
				will be free again to leave us, this time not to return, but to 
				leave the world of men in the hands of the great spiritual Server Who will be the new Head of the Hierarchy, the 
				Church Invisible. (6, P. 604).  
			 
			
			Why must Bailey's "Christ" leave? This 
			is simply because Bailey claims that no supernatural heaven 
			exists.  
			
				
				"It requires... a cessation of the 
				constant presentation of a beautiful future in a mythical 
				heaven... ." (SH, p. 8).  
				  
				
				"That Kingdom exists but it is not a 
				place of disciples or golden harps 'peopled by unintelligent 
				fanatics'... ." (ROC, p. 10).  
			 
			
			Bailey explains exactly why the human 
			race is now receiving these "new" truths. Because, 
			
				
				"{His} earlier message has been 
				negated, forgotten or misinterpreted for two thousand years... 
				." (ROC, p. 13).  
				  
				
				[The Christian Church has produced 
				a] "... distortion of {His} teachings... ." (ROC, p. 9). 
				 
				  
				
				[For the church] "... has made it 
				appear that He [Jesus] and He only and no one else could 
				possibly do the same works." (ROC, p. 9).  
				  
				
				"These groups... have so distorted 
				the teachings by dogmatic assertions on unimportant details and 
				by ridiculous claims that they have evoked little recognition of 
				the underlying truth, nor have they portrayed a {kingdom} which 
				is attractive." (ROC, p. 10).  
				
				{kingdom = earth}  
				  
				
				"The words {He} spoke were few and 
				simple and all men can understand them, but their significance 
				has been largely lost in the intricate legalities and 
				discussions of St. Paul, and in lengthy disputations of 
				theological commentators since {Christ} lived... ." (ROC, p. 2).
				 
				  
				
				{Christ, His, He = Master Jesus} 
			 
			
			Bailey claims that if a Christian wishes 
			to determine the attributes of the returning Christ, then the 
			Scriptures must not be relied upon.  
			
				
				"If men look for the Christ [Jesus] 
				who left His disciples centuries ego, they will fail to 
				recognize the {Christ} {Who} is in the process of returning. 
				"(ROC, p. 16).  
				  
				
				"'The {Christ} {Who} will return 
				will not be like the Christ Who (apparently) departed.'" (ROC, 
				p. 15).  
				  
				
				[Moreover,] "{He} comes 'to correct 
				the mistakes and the misrepresentations of those who have dared 
				to interpret His simple words in terms of their own ignorance, 
				and to recognize those whose faithful service has made {His} 
				return possible'." (ROC, p. 13).  
				  
				
				"He will gather around {Him}, in the 
				flesh, {His} chosen associates and advisers; these will not be 
				the ones who gathered around in those earlier simpler days but 
				those members of our human family who today recognize {Him} and 
				are preparing to work with {Him} as far as in them lies." (ROC, 
				p. 13). 
			 
			
			According to Bailey, one need not have 
			any particular Scripturally directed beliefs.  
			
				
				"'The {Christ} has no religious 
				barriers in {His} consciousness. It matters not to {Him} of what 
				faith a man may call himself.'" (Roc, p. 16).  
				  
				
				"There is 
				a growing and developing belief that {Christ} is in us, as {He} 
				was in Master Jesus." (ROC,p. 2).  
				  
				
				[You can believe in reincarnation 
				and the like and still remain an important part of Bailey's 
				Kingdom of God on Earth for the Buddha and Christ are considered 
				by Bailey to represent the same divine entity.]  
				  
				
				"... the Buddha and the {Christ} 
				will together pass before the {Father}, the Lord of the 
				World...." (ROC, p.4).  
				  
				
				[Christ is] "... the same great 
				Identity in all the world religions." (TMW, p. 3).  
				
				{Father = Satan in this context.}
				 
			 
			
			I close this section with the exact 
			description of how the Masters, Bailey's "Christ" and other members 
			of Bailey's Hierarchy will appear in their demon controlled dense 
			physical plane manifestations as well as the exact sequence that 
			Bailey claims will deliver the "Christ" to this world. 
			
				
				1. 'None of these dense physical 
				plane individuals will differ physically from the ordinary 
				members of the human race.' 
				
				 
				2. "... the most probable method will be through 
				overshadowing of some men, or some group of men, so that they 
				will be inspired to bring about the victory of liberty." [Men = 
				male or female] (6, p. 268). 
				
				 
				3. "... that this {Rider} on the 
					white horse is no extra-planetary Entity or Life, but 
					essentially {One} like unto ourselves - human and animal 
					combined as are we all, but fused with divinity and inspired 
					from on high, informed by the same cosmic and divine 
					Principle... . The {Rider} is one of our humanity {Who} has 
					reached a pre-destined goal and {Who} - for very {love} and 
					understanding of man - has remained for ages in the secret 
					place of revelation... waiting until {His} hour comes around 
					again and {He} can then issue forth to lead {His} people to 
					triumphant victory." (6, p. 269).  
				  
				
				"The Christian concept of the 
					return of a triumphant Christ, coming in the clouds of 
					heaven to Jerusalem, there to reign for a thousand years, is 
					true in one way and utterly false as to design, location and 
					method... . {His} coming in the air might be interpreted 
					literally to mean that at the right time {He} will come by 
					plane from a place on earth where {He} has been for many 
					generations, watching over the sons of men; the words 'every 
					eye shall see Him' might mean that, by the time {He} comes 
					television [and the Internet] will have been perfected and 
					{He} will then be seen, by its means, from even the most 
					distant spot on earth.  
				  
				
				To the orthodox Christian, the 
					above will sound like the rankest blasphemy, but the 
					question immediately arises: Why should it be blasphemy for 
					{Him} to use modern methods?...  
				
				  
				
				'A great deal of reactionary 
					stupidity will have to be eliminated before {He} can come, and it will be as the new 
					generation assert their hold over human thinking.' (6, p. 
					575-576).  
			 
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			9. The Plan, 
			More Code Words and the Great Invocation 
			
			 
			The "Plan" is rather obvious from all that has preceded this section 
			and will not be further analyzed to any great degree. 
			
			  
			
			In general, 
			however, the Plan means a one-world that is totally unified in all 
			things and this unity is to be obtained completely by human endeavor 
			that is inspired by members of the Hierarchy. Of course, this means 
			complete unity with respect to the ideals of the Scripturally 
			described Satan. In addition, this unity will be maintained by demon 
			control. One of the code words for this Plan is The New World Order.
			 
			
			  
			
			Many preparatory steps are needed in 
			order to establish this demonic 
			
			New World Order.  
			
				
				"In the preparatory period for the 
				New World Order there will be a 'steady and regulated 
				disarmament'. It will not be optional." (6, p. 191).  
			 
			
			This is required so that Bailey's United 
			Nations or a 'similar organization can utilize the Power of 
			Destruction to control the religious "fanatics," among others'. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Today [1997], this is actually what is taking place within the 
			United States. The United States is disarming while other nations 
			and organizations in the Middle and Far-East are retaining, 
			stockpiling or continuing to seek the ultimate weapons. Also we have 
			The New World Education and The New International Economic Order 
			that will 'redistribute all of the worlds economic resources'.
			 
			
			  
			
			Bailey lists the terminology that The 
			New Group of World Servers (her human disciples) should utilize. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Such terms as Right Understanding, Union, United, Human Welfare and 
			especially World Goodwill. Notice that Bailey capitalizes the first 
			letter in order to differentiate these terms from the usual ones 
			with their different basic meanings. Indeed, any terminology, with 
			the first letter a capital, that signifies complete unwavering unity 
			in thought or in deed is to be a code word for this movement.  
			
			 
			As far as the Great Invocation and other similar invocations is 
			concerned, obviously the Lucis Trust and other such organizations 
			'wish to deceive the general public as to the true meaning of this 
			and similar "mantras."'  
			
			  
			
			We are told that this "prayer" is to replace 
			the Lords Prayer and will thereby become the The New World Prayer. 
			(GI, p. 8) (TMW, p. 7).  
			
				
				"First, the general public will 
				regard it as a prayer to God Transcendent... . They will regard 
				it finally as a prayer that some equally vague primeval 
				condition of blissful happiness may be restored... . This is, 
				for them, entirely good and helpful... ." (GI, p. 8). 
				 
			 
			
			Then, depending upon your "spiritual 
			intelligence," the "Prayer" gathers more and more meaning. 
			Nevertheless, we are strongly reminded that when it is employed an 
			individual "... allies himself with the spiritual Hierarchy." (GI, 
			p. 11). 
			
			  
			
			Moreover, we are told that, 
			
				
				"... not a 
			day does by that the {Christ Himself} does not sound it forth." (GI, 
			p. 9).  
			 
			
			As to new code phrases that appear in this invocation, I draw your 
			attention to the center where the Will of God is known. 
			
			  
			
			This center 
			is 
			Shamballa, among other names. Bailey's original definition for 
			this term is The City of the Gods.... It is a sacred island 
			in the Gobi Desert. (6, p. 255).  
			
			  
			
			This term, however, has reverted to its 
			original meaning in Vedic mythology but has retained this spelling. 
			The term in Vedic mythology is spelled "Skambha" or "Stambha" and 
			refers to the entire frame or supporting structure of Bailey's 
			planetary Hierarchy, including the inner relations between the 
			Hierarchy and humanity.  
			
			  
			
			[This term is therefore similar in 
			meaning to the Scriptural term "hypostasis." The Scriptural 
			understanding of this term is that it means all of the real but 
			hidden or underlying attributes or assumptions that control and 
			yield all of the outward direct or indirect manifestations that 
			characterize a material or immaterial thing. These attributes tend 
			to be greater than any natural manifestation of their presence (the 
			reality behind appearances).]  
			
			  
			
			The changing of the spelling was 
			apparently required so that Bailey could use a small and 
			insignificant amount of occult numerology. In trivial modular 9 
			arithmetic, Shamballa is represented by the number 6, the number 
			that Bailey defines as a representation of "perfection."  
			
			  
			
			Then she 
			re-interprets 666 to simply mean the basic materialism of the 
			ordinary human being. As an individual moves along in their 
			initiation, they drop the first digit 6 and can be represented by 
			the number 66. Finally, at the end of their initiation, they can 
			then employ the number 6. (1, p. 79-80).  
			
			  
			
			Elsewhere, we are told that one of the 
			Heavenly Men is associated with the number 666, while our Heavenly 
			Man (Sanat Kumara) Bailey claims is associated with the number 
			777. 
			However, none of this numerology is developed to any extent in any 
			of the references used in this analysis.  
			 
			Further code words that appear in the Great Invocation are now 
			easily translated. The term Light means 'occult illumination or 
			enlightenment'. This refers to actual or real information obtained 
			from another natural or a supernatural mental source. This 
			particular type of light is that which is associated with the Latin 
			word lucis, a term that is usually employed to signify light 
			produced by chemical means. (8, p. 1072).  
			
			  
			
			It is to be differentiated from the 
			Christian concept of "light" which is usually considered the middle 
			English licten. (8, p. 1046). In what follows, since this 
			illumination comes from Satan and the company that publishes 
			Bailey's illuminations is the Lucis = Lucifer Publishing Company, 
			then the term "Light" as it appears in The Great Invocation is 
			translated as Luciferian enlightenment.  
			
			 
			We are told that Bailey's "Christ" also carries the titles Lord Maitreya, World Teacher, Imam Mahdi and the 
			Messiah.  
			
			  
			
			However, as 
			demonstrated, this term when it corresponds to a material entity is 
			the Scripturally defined AntiChrist. Throughout Bailey's writings 
			'what she claims to be the unintelligent, the weak ordinary 
			non-initiated human being is referred to as the little ones or those 
			with little wills'.  
			
			  
			
			These terms, at the very least, refer to 
			'anyone who follows the literal precepts of Judeo-Christian 
			doctrine'. As previously detailed, 'the Plan is to obtain complete 
			world domination even through violent means' as utilized by her 
			disciples - 
			The New Group of World Servers. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Of great importance are 
			the terms "Black Lodge," "separateness" and the like which, at the 
			least, refer to those that follow orthodox Judaic or conservative 
			Christian doctrine. If all of the significant religions are place in 
			order of Bailey's degree of hatred we would list them as Judaism, 
			conservative Christianity, some liberal Christianity, and 
			Islam.
			 
			
			  
			
			Finally, it is obvious that the Bailey 
			term "Love" corresponds in many respects to the Scripturally 
			described term hate or evil. Recall that Bailey not only advocates 
			restoring the Plan to the earth by the Power of spiritual dominance 
			but suggests that the Destruction-Construction concept is right and 
			proper to employ. 
			
			  
			
			Indeed, such violent means as the atomic bomb are 
			justified in order to rid mankind of any large group or organization 
			that stands in the way of Bailey's forthcoming kingdom of "God." 
			With all of this in mind, I now present a certainly not unique 
			translation of Bailey's Great Invocation.  
			 
			With respect to The Great Invocation, the following are the specific 
			Bailey code word correspondences that have been identified within 
			this research.  
			
			  
			
			The Bailey term or phrase appears on the left and the 
			corresponding Scriptural (or otherwise identified) term or phrase 
			appears on the right of the => symbol.  
			
				
					- 
					
					Light, light => Luciferian 
					enlightenment.   
					- 
					
					God => Satan.   
					- 
					
					stream forth => overshadow.
					  
					- 
					
					love => various forms of 
					Scripturally defined evil or, generally, hatred.  
					 
					- 
					
					Christ => AntiChrist. 
					  
					- 
					
					little wills of men => the 
					claimed unintelligent, weak and inferior desires of 
					individuals; especially those that follow conservative 
					Judeo-Christian doctrine.   
					- 
					
					purpose => to prepare for the 
					appearance of the AntiChrist.   
					- 
					
					Masters => demons or demon 
					controlled individuals.   
					- 
					
					of men => "humanity," as ruled 
					by Lucifer.   
					- 
					
					plan => complete world 
					domination in preparation for and after the appearance of 
					the AntiChrist.   
					- 
					
					seal the door where evil dwells 
					=> violent, if necessary, eradication of those that follow 
					Judaism, conservative Christianity, some
					liberal Christianity, and other similar orthodox religions. 
					  
					- 
					
					power => often hideous and 
					actual destructive forces.   
				 
			 
			
			It is an interesting exercise to 
			re-write The Great Invocation with the true meanings of the code 
			words substituted into the appropriate places. 
			  
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			10. References 
			
				
				(1) Bailey, Alice A., 
				
				A Treatise on 
				the seven Rays, Vol. V of the Rays and the Initiations. (Sixth 
				printing, 1982), Lucis, New York. 
				(2) Bailey, Alice A., 
				
				A Treatise on Cosmic Fire, (Twelfth 
				printing, 1982), Lucis, New York. 
				(3) Cavendish, Richard (ed.)., Encyclopedia of the Unexplained, 
				Magic, Occultism and Parapsychology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 
				(1974). 
				(4) Bailey, Alice A., 
				
				Initiation Human and Solar, (Fourteenth 
				printing, 1980), Lucis, New York. 
				(5) Brown, Colin, 
				
				Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Vol. 3, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, (1971). 
				(6) Bailey, Alice A., 
				
				The Externalization of the Hierarchy, 
				(Seventh printing, 1982), Lucis, New York. 
				(7) Bailey, Alice A., 
				
				From Bethlehem to Calvary, The 
				Initiations of  Jesus, Lucis, New York, (1937). 
				(8) McKechnie, Jean, Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary 
				of the English Language, Simon and Schuster, New York, (1979). 
				(9) Reference (5), Vol. 1. 
				(10) Reference (5), Vol. 2.  
				(11) Herrmann, Robert A., "The Reasonableness of Metaphysical 
				Evidence," The Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, 
				March 1982, p. 17 - 23. "Mathematical Philosophy 1981 Status 
				Report 1," The Annual Meeting of the American Scientific 
				Affiliation, Eastern College, St. Davids, PA, 23 August 1981. 
				"National Security and Mathematical Philosophy" - Report for 
				William P. Clark, Presidential Advisor for National Security 
				Affairs, (1982).  
				(TMW) The Tibetan Master's Work, Booklet, Lucis Trust, New York, 
				(1982). 
				(GI) The Use and Significance of the Great Invocation, Booklet, 
				Lucis Trust, New York, (1982). 
				(SH) The Spiritual Hierarchy, Booklet, Lucis Trust, New York, 
				(1982) 
				(ROC) 
				
				The Reappearance of the  
				Christ, Booklet, Lucis Trust, New 
				York, (1982). 
				(NGWS) The New Group of World Servers, Booklet, Lucis Trust, New 
				York, (1982). 
				(Sham) 
				Shamballa, the center where the Will of God is known, 
				Folder, Lucis Trust, New York, (1982). 
			 
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			 
			  
			  
			  
			  
			
			11. Internet Examples 
			
			 
			Of course, the main example of an Alice Bailey organization that 
			exists today and continues her work is the Lucis Trust running under 
			the code words World Goodwill. They are rather ingenious in their 
			approach and are intermediate in their "overtness." 
			 
			For a very overt presentation of the Bailey theology, consider 
			
			Benjamin Creme and his Internet site.  
			
			  
			
			Indeed, please read his 
			biography and the recommendations under the "Further reading" 
			category. This is a prime example of such overtness and is what 
			allows the covert groups to more easily carry on their efforts. 
			 
			A covert, but slowly becoming an overt, manifestation of Bailey's 
			Universal Church and the Kingdom of God on earth can be found in the 
			present day 
			Promise Keepers movement. But an 
			
			analysis of this 
			organization shows that it is a primary present day example of 
			satanic control through re-interpretation of the Scriptures and 
			overshadowing of "prominent" individuals.  
			
			  
			
			Leaders of this 
			organization us the same techniques as Bailey uses with respect to 
			the Scriptures to promulgate, in a very clever manner, the desires 
			of Bailey's satanic control; desires that will lead the way for the 
			forthcoming AntiChrist.  
			
			  
			
			A Christian with the usual amount of 
			Scriptural knowledge will be very impressed by their official 
			published statements. But, for an individual with an in-depth 
			knowledge of 
			the Bible with its unalterable fundamental 
			interpretation, this control becomes obvious when one reads or hears 
			how the leaders of this organization have either re-interpreted or 
			ignored the Scriptures. The very existence of this large 
			organization is yet another strong indication that 
			
			the time of the AntiChrist is very near.  
			 
			All of the 'so-called "psychic" heath and healing practitioners 
			actually follow portions, if not all, of the Bailey theology'. This, 
			of course, includes those that follow the teachings of Ambrose and 
			Olga Worrall.  
			
			  
			
			At least, one member of the 
			
			Seekers Church accepts 
			completely the demonic practices of the Worralls'. Bailey's 
			influence upon some members of this organization appears to be very 
			covert in character.  
			
			  
			
			But, as with all such organizations, careful 
			analysis of the official writings of some of the members of this 
			organization reveals the true identity of their spiritual control. 
			Due to the first stage of occult overshadowing, it is very possible 
			that various members of this group are not aware of the relation of 
			their beliefs to Bailey's theology.  
			
			  
			
			As an example, see how occult 
			aspects of the Worralls' healing "ministry" are discussed within the 
			sermon entitled "Faith." As a second example, there are the 
			Seekers 
			Church: Core Documents. Relative to other "Seekers" writings that 
			appear on the Internet, it is interesting to note what is missing 
			from this organizations doctrine.  
			
			  
			
			Another occult centered modern theology based upon what 
			is called "authentic mysticism" is "Creation Spirituality." You will 
			find a definition of this concept under the title 
			
			What is Creation 
			Spirituality?  
			
			  
			
			This is a key theological concept as stated on the 
			
			Creation Spirituality Network site. This doctrine is a blend of 
			Catholicism, New Age pantheism, and the universal God concept. It 
			uses many of Bailey's concepts under different code names such as 
			the "Cosmic Christ," an impersonal type of universal spiritual 
			force.  
			
			  
			
			Matthew Fox is the major contributor to this movement.  
			
			  
			
			There 
			is material on the Internet in reference to his contributions and, 
			maybe, on Web set creationspirituality.org.  
			  
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			   |