| 
			
 
 
			
			
  by Michel Chossudovsky
 27 September 2004
 
			from
			
			GlobalResearch Website 
			
			Spanish version 
			  
			  
			  
				
					
						
						"Environmental warfare is defined as the intentional modification or 
			manipulation of the natural ecology, such as climate and weather, 
			earth systems such as the ionosphere, magnetosphere, tectonic plate 
			system, and/or the triggering of seismic events (earthquakes) to 
			cause intentional physical, economic, and psycho-social, and 
			physical destruction to an intended target geophysical or population 
			location, as part of strategic or tactical war."
 
						(Eco News) 
			  
			
			What are the underlying causes of extreme weather instability, which 
			has ravaged every major region of the World in the course of the 
			last few years? 
 Hurricanes and tropical storms have ravaged the Caribbean. Central 
			Asia and the Middle East are afflicted by drought. West Africa is 
			facing the biggest swarm of locusts in more than a decade. Four 
			destructive hurricanes and a tropical rain storm Alex, Ivan, 
			Frances, Charley and Jeanne have occurred in a sequence, within a 
			short period of time.
 
			  
			Unprecedented in hurricane history in the 
			Caribbean, the island of Grenada was completely devastated: 37 
			people died and roughly two-thirds of the island's 100,000 
			inhabitants have been left homeless; in Haiti, more than two 
			thousand people have died and tens of thousands are homeless.  
			  
			The 
			Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Cuba, the Bahamas and Florida have also 
			been devastated. In the US, the damage in several Southern states 
			including Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi and the Carolinas 
			is the highest in US history.
 A study released in July 2003, by the World Meteorological 
			Organization (WMO) places the blame, without further examination, at 
			the feet of global warming:
 
				
				"These record extreme events [high temperatures, low temperatures 
			and high rainfall amounts and droughts] all go into calculating the 
			monthly and annual averages which, for temperatures, have been 
			gradually increasing over the past 100 years," the WMO said in its 
			statement. 
				(CNN, July 3, 2003,
				
				http://www.cnn.com/2003/WEATHER/07/03/wmo.extremes/ 
				) 
			While global warming is undoubtedly an important factor, it does not 
			fully account for these extreme and unusual weather patterns.
 
			  
			  
			
			Weather Warfare
 
 The significant expansion in America's weather warfare arsenal, 
			which is a priority of the Department of Defense is not a matter for 
			debate or discussion.
 
			  
			While, environmentalists blame the Bush 
			administration for not having signed the Kyoto protocol, the issue 
			of "weather warfare", namely the manipulation of weather patterns 
			for military use is never mentioned.
 The US Air Force has the capability of manipulating climate either 
			for testing purposes or for outright military-intelligence use.
 
			  
			These capabilities extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, 
			droughts and earthquakes. In recent years, large amounts of money 
			have been allocated by the US Department of Defense to further 
			developing and perfecting these capabilities. 
 Weather modification will become a part of domestic and 
			international security and could be done unilaterally... It could 
			have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for 
			deterrence purposes.
 
			  
			The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and 
			storms on earth or to modify space weather, ... and the production 
			of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of 
			technologies which can provide substantial increase in US, or 
			degraded capability in an adversary, to achieve global awareness, 
			reach, and power. (US Air Force. Air University of 
			the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report, 
			
			http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/)
 While there is no firm evidence that the US Air Force weather 
			warfare facilities have been deliberately applied to modify weather 
			patterns, one would expect that if these capabilities are being 
			developed for military use, they would at least be the object of 
			routine testing, much in the same way as the testing of new 
			conventional and strategic weapons systems.
 
 Needless to say, the subject matter is a scientific taboo. The 
			possibility of climatic or environmental manipulations as part of a 
			military and intelligence agenda, while tacitly acknowledged, is 
			never considered as relevant. Military analysts are mute on the 
			subject. Meteorologists are not investigating the matter, and 
			environmentalists are strung on global warming and the Kyoto 
			protocol.
 
 Ironically, the Pentagon, while recognizing its ability to modify 
			the World's climate for military use, has joined the global warming 
			consensus. In 
			
			a major study (pdf), the Pentagon has analyzed in 
			detail the implications of various global warming scenarios.
 
 The Pentagon document constitutes a convenient cover-up. Not a word 
			is mentioned about its main weather warfare program: The 
			High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) based in 
			Gokona, Alaska - jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US 
			Navy.
 
 
 
			  
				
					
						| 
						  
						TABLE 1 
						Unusual Weather Patterns (2003-2004) 
							
							
							Alex, Ivan, Frances, Charley and Jeanne (August-September 2004): 
			Four destructive hurricanes and a tropical rain storm occur in a 
			sequence, within a short period of time. Unprecedented in hurricane 
			history in the Caribbean, the island of Grenada is completely 
			devastated: 37 people died and roughly two-thirds of the island's 
			100,000 inhabitants have been left homeless, in Haiti, more than two 
			thousand people have died and tens of thousands have been made 
			homeless. The Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Cuba and the Bahamas have 
			also been devastated. 
 In the US, the damage hitting several Southern states including 
			Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi and the Carolinas is the 
			highest in US history.
 
							
							Brazil March 2004: The first-ever hurricane formed in the South 
			Atlantic, striking Brazil with 90 mph winds and causing up to a 
			dozen deaths. "Meteorologists were left scratching their heads in 
			bewilderment as the familiar swirl of clouds, complete with a 
			well-defined eye, appeared in an oceanic basin where none had been 
			spotted before."  
							(WP, 19 September 2004, See also
							
							http://www.climate.org/topics/climate/brazil_hurricane.shtml
							)
							
							Japan, China and the Korean Peninsula: "Japan has suffered its 
			highest number of typhoon strikes on record, and the storms - which 
			hit at the rate of one a week for much of the summer - wreaked 
			havoc in Taiwan, China and the Korean Peninsula." (ibid)
							
							China (August 2004): Typhoon Rananim, the worst in 48 years, has 
			killed at least 164 people and injured more than 1800 in China's 
			Zhejiang province. Rananim is confirmed by China's meteorological 
							authorities to be the strongest to hit the Chinese 
							mainland since 1956. It is estimated to have 
							disrupted the life of some 13 million people. 
							
							
							http://www.cma.gov.cn/ywwz/englishread.php?recid=39616
							
							
							United States May 2003 : 562 tornadoes hit the United States, the 
			highest in recorded history, far exceeding the previous monthly peak 
			of 399 in June 1992. 
							(CNN, July 3, 2003,
							
							http://www.cnn.com/2003/WEATHER/07/03/wmo.extremes/ 
							)
							
							India, early 2003: a pre-monsoon heat wave caused peak temperatures 
			of between 45 and 49 degrees Celsius (113 to 120 degrees 
			Fahrenheit), killing more than 1400 people. (Ibid) 
							
							Sri Lanka, "heavy rainfalls from Tropical Cyclone 01B exacerbated 
			already wet conditions, causing flooding and landslides and more 
			than 300 fatalities." (Ibid)
							
							Western Europe Summer 2003: experienced extremely high Summer 
			temperatures. "Switzerland experienced its hottest June [2003] in at 
			least 250 years while in the south of France average temperatures 
			were between 5 and 7 degrees Celsius (9 to 13 degrees Fahrenheit) 
			warmer than the long term average. England and Wales also 
			experienced their hottest month since 1976." (Ibid) |  
			  
			  
			
			There are several mainstream explanations on weather and climate 
			change, none of which fully explains, within their respective terms 
			of reference, the highly unusual and erratic weather occurrences, 
			not to mention the human toll and devastation, which have led to the 
			destabilization of entire agricultural and eco-systems.
 
			  
			
			Needless to 
			say these explanations never address the issue of climate 
			manipulation for military use. 
 
			  
			  
			
			Climatic Manipulation by the US Military 
			- The HAARP Program
 
 The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) based in 
			Gokona, Alaska, has been in existence since 1992. It is part of a 
			new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US Strategic 
			Defense Initiative (SDI).
 
			  
			Operated by the Air Force Research 
			Laboratory's Space Vehicles Directorate, HAARP constitutes a system 
			of powerful antennas capable of creating "controlled local 
			modifications of the ionosphere" [upper layer of the atmosphere]: 
				
				"[HAARP will be used] to induce a small, localized change in 
			ionospheric temperature so that resulting physical reactions can be 
			studied by other instruments located either at or close to the HAARP 
			site". 
			Nicholas Begich - actively involved in the public campaign against HAARP - describes HAARP as: 
				
				"A super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of 
			the ionosphere by focusing a beam and heating those areas. 
			Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate 
			everything - living and dead."  
				(for further details see Michel Chossudovsky 
				'Washington's New World Order 
						Weapons Have The Ability To Trigger Climate Change') 
			World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell depicts HAARP as, 
				
				"a 
			gigantic heater that can cause major disruptions in the ionosphere, 
			creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer 
			that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet." 
				 
				(quoted in Chossudovsky, op cit.) 
			According to Richard Williams, a physicist and consultant to the 
			David Sarnoff laboratory in Princeton
			HAARP constitutes "an irresponsible act of global vandalism."  
			  
			He and 
			others fear a secret second stage where HAARP would,  
				
				"beam much more energy into the 
				ionosphere. That could produce a severe disruption of the upper 
				atmosphere at one location that may produce effects that spread 
				rapidly around the Earth for years."  
				(Quoted in Scott Gilbert,
				
				Environmental Warfare and US Foreign 
				Policy: The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction) 
			HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of 
			scientific and academic research. US military documents seem to 
			suggest, however, that HAARP's main objective is to "exploit the 
			ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes." (quoted in Chossudovsky, op cit).
			 
 Without explicitly referring to the HAARP program, a US Air Force 
			study points to the use of "induced ionospheric modifications" as a 
			means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy 
			communications and radar. (Ibid)
 
 HAARP also has the ability of triggering blackouts and disrupting 
			the electricity power system of entire regions.
 
 An analysis of statements emanating from the US Air Force points to 
			the unthinkable: the covert manipulation of weather patterns, 
			communications systems and electric power as a weapon of global 
			warfare, enabling the US to disrupt and dominate entire regions of 
			the World.
 
 
			  
			  
			
			Weather Warfare 
			- A Corporate Bonanza
 
 HAARP has been operational since the early 1990s. Its system of 
			antennas at Gakona, Alaska, was initially based on a technology 
			patented by Advanced Power Technologies Inc. (APTI), a subsidiary of 
			Atlantic Ritchfield Corporation (ARCO).
 
			  
			The first phase of the HAARP Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI) was completed by APTI. The IRI 
			system of antennas was first installed in 1992 by a subsidiary of 
			British Aerospace Systems (BAES) using the APTI patent. The antennas 
			beam into the outer-atmosphere using a set of wireless high 
			frequency transmitters.
 In 1994, ARCO sold its APTI subsidiary, including the patents and 
			the second phase construction contract to E-Systems, a secretive 
			high tech military outfit with links to the CIA.
 
 E-Systems specializes in the production of electronic warfare 
			equipment, navigation and reconnaissance machinery, including 
			"highly sophisticated spying devices":
 
				
				"[E-Systems] is one of the biggest 
				intelligence contractors in the world, doing work for the CIA, 
				defense intelligence organizations, and others. US$1.8 billion 
				of their annual sales are to these organizations, with $800 
				million for black projects-projects so secret that even the 
				United States Congress isn't told how the money is being spent. 
				(HAARP - 
				High Frequency Vandalism 
				in the Sky?)
 "The company has outfitted such military projects as the Doomsday 
			Plan (the system that allows the President to manage a nuclear war) 
			and Operation Desert Storm."
 
				(Princeton Review,
				http://www.princetonreview.com/cte/profiles/internshipGenInfo.asp?internshipID=998 
				) 
			With the purchase of APTI, E-Systems acquired the strategic weather 
			warfare technology and patent rights, including Bernard J. Eastlund's
			
			US Patent No: 4,686,605 entitled "Method and Apparatus 
			for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or 
			Magnetosphere".
 It is worth mentioning that the Eastlund /APTI patents were based on 
			the research of Yugoslav scientist 
			Nicola Tesla (many of whose ideas 
			were stolen by US corporations). 
			(See Scott Gilbert, 
			
			Environmental Warfare and US Foreign Policy: 
			The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction)
 
 Eastlund described this deadly technology as capable of:
 
				
				"causing… total disruption of communications over a very large 
			portion of the Earth… missile or aircraft destruction, deflection or 
			confusion…  weather modification…"  
			Not surprisingly, the patent had previously been sealed under a 
			government secrecy order.
 Barely a year following the E-Systems purchase of APTI's weather 
			warfare technology, E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon, the fourth 
			largest US military contractor. Through this money-spinning 
			acquisition, Raytheon became the largest "defense electronics" firm 
			in the World.
 
 Meanwhile, ARCO which had sold APTI to E-Systems, had itself been 
			acquired by the BP-AMOCO oil consortium, thereby integrating the 
			largest oil company in the World (BP).
 
 Raytheon through its E-Systems subsidiary now owns the patents used 
			to develop the HAARP weather warfare facility at Gakona Alaska. 
			Raytheon is also involved in other areas of weather research for 
			military use, including the activities of its subsidiary in 
			Antarctica, Raytheon Polar Services.
 
 
			  
			  
			
			"Owning the Weather" 
			- Towards the Expanded Final Stage
 
 The HAARP antenna array and transmitters were slated to be built in 
			several distinct phases (http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/phases.html)
 
				
			 
			During the Clinton administration, the "Filled Developmental 
			Prototype" (FDP), namely a system composed of an array of 48 active 
			antenna elements with connected wireless transmitters, was installed 
			and completed at the HAARP facility in 1994. (See Figure 1 below)  
			  
			Under the initial Developmental 
			Prototype (DP), only 18 of the 48 
			transmitters were connected.
 Bernard Eastlund in a 1997 interview described this antenna array in 
			its Filled DP stage as the "the largest ionospheric heater ever 
			built".
 
 This system of 48 antennas, however, while fully operational, was 
			not according to Eastlund, powerful enough (in 1997) "to bring the 
			ideas in his patents to fruition":
 
				
				"But they're getting up there", he said. "This is a very powerful 
			device. Especially if they go to the expanded stage." 
				 
				(quoted in 
			Scott Gilbert, op cit, see also
				
				Discordant HAARP - High-frequency Active 
				Auroral Research Program) 
			This 'final expanded stage' envisioned by Eastlund, which will 
			provide maximum capability to manipulate the World's weather 
			patterns, has now been reached.
 Under the Bush administration, the main partner of Raytheon (which 
			owns the patents) in the construction and development stage of the 
			HAARP antenna array, is British Aerospace Systems (BAES), which had 
			been involved in the initial installation of the antenna array in 
			the early 1990s.
 
 The multimillion dollar contract was granted by The Office of Naval 
			Research to BAES in 2003, through its US subsidiary BAE Systems 
			Advanced Technologies Inc. The contract was signed barely two months 
			before the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq.
 
 Using Raytheon's technology, BAES was to develop the HAARP Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI) to its maximum capabilities of 
			"Full size or final IRI (FIRI)".
 
 In April 2003, BAE Systems Advanced Technologies outsourced the 
			production and installation of the antennas to 
			
			Phazar Corp., a company specializing in advanced wireless antennas for military 
			use. (Phazar owns 
			
			Antenna Products Corporation of Mineral Wells, 
			Texas).
 
			  
			Phazar was entrusted with 
			producing and installing 132 crossed dipole antennas items for the 
			HAARP facility. (http://www.antennaproducts.com/News 
			Release 04-18-03.pdf) 
			A year later, in April 2004, the final phase in the expansion of the 
			HAARP facility was launched. (Dept of Defense, 19 April 2004). This 
			phase consisted in equipping all the 180 antennas with high 
			frequency transmitters. BAE Systems was awarded another lucrative 
			contract, this time for $35 million.
 
 In July 2004, Phazar had delivered and installed the 132 crossed 
			dipole antennas including the antenna support structures and ground 
			screen items at the HAARP facility, bringing the number of antennas 
			from 48 under the FDP stage to 180. (see Table 2).
 
 Meanwhile, BAE Systems had contracted with Jersey based defense 
			electronics firm DRS Technologies, Inc in an $11.5 million 
			outsourcing arrangement, the production and installation of the 
			high-frequency (HF) radio transmitters for the HAARP antenna array.
 
			(See 
			
			http://www.drs.com/press/archivelist.cfm?PRESS_RELEASE_ID=1529&preview=1 
			and Business Wire, 15 June 2004).  
			  
			DRS specializes in a variety of 
			
			leading edge products for the U.S. military and intelligence 
			agencies.  
			
			Under its contract with BAE Systems Information and Electronic 
			Warfare Systems in Washington, D.C., DRS is to manufacture and 
			install "more than 60 Model D616G 10-Kilowatt Dual Transmitters" to 
			be used with the HAARP system of antennas. (It is unclear from the 
			company statements whether all the 180 antennas will be equipped 
			with a transmitter, bringing the system up to full IRI 
			capabilities).
 
 Deliveries and installation are to be completed by July 2006. While 
			HAARP is described as a "research project", the production of the 
			transmitters was entrusted to DRS' C41 "Command, Control, 
			Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I) Group"
 
 The diagram and images below describe the HAARP Alaska Facility in 
			1997.
 
			  
			 
			Figure 1: The Array of 48 Antenna Elements with the Transmitter 
			Shelters (FDP stage) 
			
			The 48 antenna array is supported by transmitter shelters, each of 
			which contains 6 transmitter cabinets. (See image of shelter below).
			Each cabinet contains two transmitters (image of cabinet below).
 
			  
			The newly installed 132 dipole antennas supplied by Phazar vastly 
			increase the size of the HAARP Alaska facility; the new transmitters 
			are supplied and installed by DRS. 
			  
			 Image 1: Aerial Photo of the HAARP Alaska Site
 
 
 
			
			
  Image 2: HAARP Antenna Array
 
 
 
			
			
  Image 3 Transmitter Shelter
 Transmitter Shelter containing Six Transmitter Cabinets. Each 
			Cabinet contains two transmitters
 
 
 
			
			
  Image 4: Inside the Transmitter Shelter
 
 
			
			
  Image 5. Two Transmitters making up a Transmitter Cabinet
 
 
 
			
 Testing of HAARP Equipment (2003- 2004)
 
 It is worth noting that the expansion of the antenna array (e.g. 
			during 2003-2004) required, as part of the contracts reached with 
			BAE Systems and its various subcontractors, the routine testing of 
			the installed weather warfare equipment.
 
			  
			
			An intermediate stage 
			Limited IRI (LIRI), could be in operation by 2004, following the 
			completion of the 180 antenna array under the Phazar contract and 
			pending the final delivery of the remaining HF radio transmitters.
			
 In this regard, a report published by the Russian parliament (Duma) 
			in 2002, suggests that the US Military had plans to test its weather 
			modification techniques at its Alaska facility, as well as at two 
			other sites:
 
				
				"The committees reported that the USA is planning to test three 
			facilities of this kind. One of them is located on the military 
			testing ground in Alaska and its full-scale tests are to begin in 
			early 2003. The second one is in Greenland and the third one in 
			Norway.
 "When these facilities are launched into space from Norway, Alaska 
			and Greenland, a closed contour will be created with a truly 
			fantastic integral potential for influencing the near-Earth medium," 
			the State Duma said.
   
				The USA plans to carry out large-scale scientific experiments under 
				
				the HAARP program, and not controlled by the global community, will 
			create weapons capable of breaking radio communication lines and 
			equipment installed on spaceships and rockets, provoke serious 
			accidents in electricity networks and in oil and gas pipelines and 
			have a negative impact on the mental health of people populating 
			entire regions, the deputies said.  
				(Interfax News Agency, original 
			Russian, BBC Monitoring, 8 August 2002, emphasis added) 
			Whether this report by the Russian Duma on testing "starting in 
			early 2003" is correct or not, the US administration must be 
			confronted nationally and internationally, at the political and 
			diplomatic levels, at the UN and the US Congress, by the 
			international scientific community, by environmentalists and the 
			antiwar movement.  
			  
			The future of humanity is threatened by the use of 
			weather modification techniques.
 Moreover, to wage an effective campaign, it is essential that 
			corroborating scientific investigation of the unusual weather 
			occurrences observed in recent years (and particularly since early 
			2003) be undertaken. This investigation should be far-reaching, 
			collecting relevant data, correlating specific weather occurrences 
			to recorded antenna activity at the Alaska site as well as at the 
			two other sites, etc.
 
 The Full Size Ionospheric Research Instrument FIRI stage, described 
			as "a maximum size of 180 antenna elements, arranged in 15 columns 
			by 12 rows" is scheduled to be completed by mid-2006 (assuming the 
			installation of the remaining dual transmitters), at which time the 
			HAARP program will have reached its maximum FIRI capacity, meaning 
			the ability to selectively modify, for military use, weather 
			patterns anywhere in the World.
 
				
				"The IRI is currently [June 2004] composed of 48 antenna elements 
			and has a power capacity of 960,000 watts. When installed, the 
			additional 132 transmitters will give HAARP a 3.6 mega-watt capacity 
			[see Table 2 below].  
				  
				The HAARP build-out is jointly funded by the 
			U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Navy and the Defense Advanced Research 
			Projects Agency (DARPA)." 
				(Business Wire, 10 June 2004) 
				  
			
			Table 2: Comparison of IRI Phases
 
 
				
					
						| 
							
							
								|   | 
								DP | 
								FDP | 
								LIRI | 
								FIRI |  
								| 
								Number of Active 
								Antenna Elements | 
								18 | 
								48 | 
								108 | 
								180 |  
								| 
								Total Transmitter 
								Power (kW) | 
								360 | 
								960 | 
								2160 | 
								3600 |  
								| 
								Maximum Antenna Gain 
								(dB) | 
								19 | 
								24 | 
								29 | 
								31 |  
								| 
								Max Effective 
								Radiated Pwr (dBW) | 
								74 | 
								84 | 
								92 | 
								96 |  
								| 
								Min Antenna Pattern 
								Width (degrees) | 
								  | 
								9 | 
								8 | 
								5 |  
								| 
								Frequency Range | 
								2.8 to 10 MHz |  
								| 
								Modulation Types | 
								CW/AM/FM/PM |  |  
			  
			Source 
			
			http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/phases.html 
 
			This advanced stage of full capacity (FIRI) corresponds to what the 
			US Air Force has called "Owning the Weather": 
				
				US aerospace forces [will] 'own the weather' by capitalizing on 
			emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies 
			to war-fighting applications...  
				  
				From enhancing friendly operations 
			or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of 
			natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global 
			communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers 
			the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce 
			an adversary...    
				In the United States, weather-modification will 
			likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic 
			and international applications. Our government will pursue such a 
			policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. 
				(US Air Force, 
			emphasis added. Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final 
			Report, 
				http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/ )
 
				  
			  
			Weather Warfare against "Rogue States"
 The unusual climatic occurrences in the US and Western Europe have 
			been extensively documented.
 
 However, what the news media has failed to underscore is that a 
			number of unusual and dramatic climatic changes have occurred in 
			recent years in countries which are identified as possible targets 
			under the US Administration's pre-emptive war doctrine.
 
 Weather patterns in North Korea, for instance, have been marked 
			since the mid-1990s by a succession of droughts, followed by floods. 
			The result has been the destruction of an entire agricultural 
			system. In Cuba, the pattern is very similar to that observed in 
			North Korea. (see Table 3 below)
 
 In Iraq, Iran and Syria, a devastating drought occurred in 1999. In 
			Afghanistan, four years of drought in the years preceding the US led 
			invasion in 2001, have led to the destruction of the peasant 
			economy, leading to widespread famine.
 
 While there is no proof that these weather occurrences are the 
			result of climatic warfare, Phillips Geophysics Lab, which is a 
			partner in the HAARP project provides a course for military 
			personnel at the Hanscom Air Force Base in Maryland, on "Weather 
			Modification Techniques". The course outline explicitly 
			contemplates the triggering of storms, hurricanes, etc. for military 
			use. (See PDF File 'Weather 
			Modification - Advanced Weapon/Instrumentation Technologies')
 
 Weather manipulation is the pre-emptive weapon par excellence.
 
			  
			
			It 
			can be directed against enemy countries or even "friendly nations", 
			without their knowledge. Weather warfare constitutes a covert form 
			of pre-emptive war. The manipulation of climate can be used to 
			destabilize an enemy's economy, ecosystem and agriculture (e.g. 
			North Korea or Cuba).  
			  
			
			Needless to say it can trigger havoc in 
			financial and commodity markets and can potentially be used as an 
			instrument of "insider trade" for financial gain. It has the ability 
			of destabilizing a country's institutions. Concurrently, the 
			disruption in agriculture creates a greater dependency on food aid 
			and imported grain staples from the US and other Western countries.
 The Bush administration has stated that it reserves the right to 
			attack these countries preemptively, with a view to ensuring the 
			security of the American homeland.
 
 Washington - as part of its nuclear posture review - has threatened 
			several countries including China and Russia with pre-emptive 
			nuclear strikes. One would assume that the same targeting of rogue 
			states exists with regard to the use of weather modification 
			techniques".
 
 While there is no evidence of the use of weather warfare against 
			rogue states, the policy guidelines on "weather intervention 
			techniques" have already been established and the technology is 
			fully operational.
 
			  
			
			
 
				
					
						| 
						  
						Table 3 
						Unusual Weather Occurrences:  
						North Korea, Cuba, Afghanistan 
			and Iraq 
						
			North Korea
 
 Recurrent flooding and drought often in the same year has hit North 
			Korea since 1995, 220,000 people died in the ensuing famine, 
			according to Pyongyang's own figures. U.S. figures place the number 
			of deaths resulting from famine at 2 million.
 
 The first major flooding occurred in 1995.
 
 There were floods and drought in 1999. The serious water shortage 
			resulting from the 1999 drought was conducive to the destruction of 
			crops.
 
							
							"The temperature of water in rice fields goes beyond 40 degrees and 
			the tall rice plants fresh from the rice seedling beds are 
			withering. In particular, nearly all after-crop maize seedlings and 
			seeds are perishing," it added. 
						In 2001, in June there was an extensive drought with rainfall just 
			10% of normal levels, which served to undermine agricultural crops. 
			And then a few months later, in October, there were extensive 
			floodings leading to the further destruction of rice harvests and a 
			crisis situation in food distribution. 
							
							"Officials in Kangwon province - an area which already suffers food 
			shortages - say the impact of the torrential rain and flooding has 
			been devastating. The normal recorded rainfall for October should be 
			around 20mm. But in the worst-affected areas 400mm (18 inches) of 
			rain fell in just 12 hours. "It was the worst flooding we've had 
			since records began in 1910," said Kim Song Hwan, head of the 
			government's Flood Damage Rehabilitation Committee for the region." 
							(BBC, 23 Oct 2001,
							http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1614981.stm 
							) 
						
			Cuba
 
 For several years Cuba has been affected by recurrent droughts. In 
			1998, rainfall in Eastern Cuba was at its lowest level since 1941.
 
							
							A United Nations team estimated 539,000 people, 280,000 of them 
			farmers, were directly affected by reduced availability of food or 
			reduced income through production losses. Some reported effects are: 
			hunger in areas; a loss of up to 14% of the sugar cane crop planted 
			last year and a reduction in this spring's planted crops, since 
			rains were not sufficient for some seeds to germinate (which will 
			reduce next year's crop); as much as 42% losses in food staples such 
			as root vegetables, beans, bananas, and rice in the five eastern 
			provinces; and livestock, poultry, and egg production losses.(UN Relief, 
							
							http://www.reliefweb.int/w/rwb.nsf/0/2975570e60ff2a7685256680005a8e2d?OpenDocument)
 
						In 2003, a devastating drought hit the Western part of Cuba.
			In 2004 May-June, the country is hit by the worst drought in its 
			history: 
							
							"A severe drought enveloping eastern Cuba has eroded 40 percent of 
			the farmland, starved thousands of heads of cattle and has close to 
			4 million people counting every drop of water they consume." 
							 
						The 
			drought is described as the worst in 40 years. 
							
							“The drought has robbed underground water levels of some 10 feet 
			over the past 10 years, leaving over 5,000 wells across the province 
			dry,” said Leandro Bermudez, a geologist and the second man at 
			Cuba’s National Institute of Hydraulic Resources.  
							(MSNBC, 21 June 
			2004 
							http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5262324) 
						The cities are running out of water. According to the Independent, 
			"Drought is bringing Cuba to its knees
 Unnoticed by the world, the longest dry period for decades has 
			brought much of Cuba to its knees. Could this be the crisis that 
			finally destroys Fidel's revolution?
 
							
							"All across central and eastern Cuba, farmers, ranchers, city 
			dwellers and government officials are scrambling to deal with a 
			punishing drought that began a decade ago and intensified in the 
			last two years.
 Although traditionally arid, the provinces of Holguin, Camaguey and 
			Las Tunas hold some of Cuba's finest pasture and farmland and have 
			long been crucial to this communist nation's dairy, beef and 
			agricultural industries.
 
 More than 12,500 cattle have died in Holguin alone in 2004 and milk 
			production has fallen 20 percent. The price of beans, plantains, 
			sweet potatoes and other staples has soared in private markets.
 
 The drought has caused millions of dollars in losses and officials 
			are spending millions more digging wells, building a water pipeline 
			and taking other measures to try to ease the crisis - huge sums in 
			an impoverished nation struggling through tough economic times and a 
			battle with the United States.
 
 Officials also have moved thousands of cattle to more fertile areas 
			and are working furiously to finish a 32-mile pipeline that will 
			draw water to Holguin city from Cuba's largest river, the Cauto. The 
							$5 million pipeline could be completed next month."
 
							(Chicago Tribune, July 
							29, 2004
							
							http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/world/9271316.htm) 
						The above report date to September 2004, it was published before, 
			the hurricanes hit the Cuban coastline followed by torrential rains. 
						
 Afghanistan and The former Soviet Republics of Central Asia
 
 The worst drought in Afghanistan history occurred in the three 
			consecutive years prior to the onslaught of the US led invasion, 
			from 1999 to 2001. The agricultural recovery of the 1990s, in the 
			wake of the Soviet-Afghan war was brought to a standstill.
 
 In the wake of the US led 2001 invasion, the United States supplied 
			Afghanistan with genetically modified wheat and appropriate types of 
			fertilizer to be used with the GM wheat, which was said to be high 
			yield drought resistant. The donation of GM wheat, however, also led 
			to destabilizing the small peasant economy because the GM wheat 
			varieties could not reproduced locally. In 2002, famines which were 
			barely reported by the media, swept the country.
 
 Similar although less severe conditions prevailed in the former 
			Soviet republics of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, 
			Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.
 
 Like Afghanistan, Tajikistan has had its infrastructure ruined by 
			prolonged civil war with Muslim fundamentalists. Since then, the 
			worst regional drought in 74 years has destroyed food crops over a 
			large part of the nation, rendering almost half of the 6.2 million 
			people in the country vulnerable to the threat of famine and 
			disease, up from 3 million last year. About the only portion of the 
			economy that has been unaffected is the drug trade.
 
						. 
						Tajikistan is 
			the transit route for 65 to 85 percent of heroin smuggled out of 
			Afghanistan, the world’s largest producer. 
			(http://www.americanfreepress.net/Mideast/Drought__Desperation_Breed_Vio/drought__desperation_breed_vio.html]
 Triggered by the lowest rainfall (2001) in living memory, vast 
			tracts of Iran, Uzbekistan, Pakistan and Tajikistan are being 
			reduced to desert as the water table sinks, long-established wells 
			dry up and herds of livestock perish.
 
 The crisis appears to fulfill alarming climate change predictions 
			suggesting that states along the old Silk Road will experience 
			steeper rises in temperature than any other region on earth. By the 
			end of the century it will be 5C hotter in an area which regularly 
			sees the thermometer soar above 40C.
 
 The study, published last year by the Tyndall Centre for Climate 
			Change Research at the University of East Anglia, predicted that 
			Asian countries from Kazakhstan to Saudi Arabia will warm up more 
			than twice as much as others. "Several states," the report added, 
			"including Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan and Iran, [are 
			facing] famine."
 
 In Tajikistan, the United Nations appealed for aid to avert 
			disaster. "Substantial foreign aid is needed or else there will be a 
			large-scale famine," said Matthew Kahane, the UN's humanitarian aid 
			coordinator, speaking from the capital, Dushanbe.
 
							
							"The country has had its lowest rainfall for 75 years. Families who 
			survived last year by selling their cows and chickens now have no 
			other means of coping. Some households have sold the glass out of 
			their windows and the wooden beams from their roofs to raise money 
			for food."(The Guardian, 0ct 30, 2001, 
							
							http://www.guardian.co.uk/famine/story/0,12128,736902,00.html)
 
						Iraq
 In 1999, Iraq suffered its worst drought of the century, with the 
			effect of triggering an even greater dependence on imported grain 
			under the oil for food program. There was a drop of up to 70 percent 
			in domestic yields of wheat, barley and other cereals, which served 
			to further weaken the country's economy, crippled by economic 
			sanctions and the routine bombing by allied aircraft in the no-fly 
			zones.
 
 A similar (although less serious) situation prevailed in Syria and 
			Iran, marked by significant declines in agricultural output.
 
						  |  
			  
			  
			    |