|
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
from
SaveTheMales Website
Contents
-
"Protocols
of Zion" is the NWO Blueprint -
August 31, 2003
-
'Elders of Zion' Shape Our Culture
-
September 08, 2003
-
Did Rothschild Write The Protocols of Zion?
-
September 21, 2003
-
Protocols Forgery Argument is Flawed
-
December 14, 2003
-
The Protocols of Zion Updated
-
February 15, 2004
"Protocols of
Zion" is the NWO Blueprint
August 31, 2003
"If this state can't acknowledge
God, then other states can't ...And eventually the United States
of America will not be able to acknowledge the very source of
our rights and liberties and the very source of our laws."
Judge Roy Moore
Last week Alabama Chief Justice Roy
Moore was suspended and his Ten Commandments monument removed from
the rotunda of the Alabama Judicial Building.
 Consider the irony: the injunction "Thou Shall Not Steal" is
banished from the Judicial Building.
How long can the concept of justice survive when it is divorced from
belief in a transcendent moral order?
As Moore says, the source of our rights is God. Abolish Him and soon
we will have no rights.
The action which upheld the separation of church and state was in
response to a suit by the American Civil Liberties Union, It is part
of a nationwide campaign to eliminate all references to America's
Judeo-Christian heritage from the public sphere.
The ACLU is a Communist front dedicated to abolishing the United
States and establishing a totalitarian world government. They are
following a satanic blueprint laid out in "The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion."
I hate to sound melodramatic but unfortunately the truth may be very
bizarre. I want to be wrong because if I am not, the forces
responsible for the worst horrors of the last century are still in
charge.
We are in the eleventh hour of a multigenerational conspiracy
designed to first degrade and then enslave mankind. September 11
proclaimed the beginning of the final stage in the establishment of
a totalitarian "new world order" (a.k.a. "globalization.")
The war on terror is a ruse designed to mask the creation of a
police state. There are new developments every day. Canadians can't
smile on their passports pictures because they will be used in
facial recognition and surveillance systems. All British cars will
be fitted with microchips, which "will automatically report a wide
range of offences."
STARING US IN THE FACE
An age-old conspiracy is being consummated right under our nose.
George W. Bush is an admitted member of a satanic secret society,
the "Skull and Bones," an offshoot of the European illuminati.
The Illuminati worship Lucifer "the bringer of light." The
Illuminati originates in the Babylonian mystery cults, Jewish
Kabala, the Templars, Freemasons and other interests dedicated to
Satan worship and absolute power.
Adam Weishaupt, a professor at the University of Inglestadt in
Germany, founded "The Order of the Illuminati" in 1776 on Communist
May Day. Prince William of Hesse Casel and his banker Meyer Amschel
Rothschild, the wealthiest man in the world were behind Weishaupt. A
few years later the Illuminati took over the Freemasons and have
used them to manipulate world events ever since.
"The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is the Illuminati's Master
Plan. I cannot overemphasize the importance of this book. In coming
weeks, I will continue my analysis.
The Illuminati goal is to overthrow western civilization through the
destruction of its four pillars: family, nation/race, religion and
democracy. This will be replaced by a totalitarian "super
government" devoted to Lucifer "our Sovereign Lord of all the
World." (124)
The Protocols clearly was not intended to become public. It was
obtained by an agent of the Tsarist secret police in Paris and
published in Russia in 1901. After the Bolshevik Revolution
slaughtered the Tsar and his family in 1918, the Protocols was
banned on pain of death.
It has been excoriated as an anti-Semitic forgery. This is a red
herring designed to divert attention from its real and startling
significance. It describes a long-term "strategic plan" for the
subversion of mankind.
The book is Satanic in character and as such embraces anyone. Yes, a
leader of a Jewish secret society composed it. But Italians don't
rush to the defense of the Mafia, another secret society. If they
did, it would cast suspicion on them all. Jews need not fall on
their swords for Satanists.
The Protocols refers to outsiders as "goyim," the Yiddish word for
gentile. But in fact, the goyim are outsiders in relation to
Satanism and/or the "aristocracy of money."
"On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the
goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by
the aristocracy of money. The qualifications of this aristocracy we
have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in
knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force."
(119)
In other words, our despots are Luciferian sages and bankers, their
wealthy allies, along with educated lackeys (technocrats,
politicians, writers, teachers) who make the satanic wheels turn.
SPIRITUAL WARFARE
We are talking about spiritual warfare, the cosmic struggle between
Good and Evil. The essence of Christianity is that man has a Divine
soul and is intended to evolve and become more God-like. Universal
Love is the Divine Plan for mankind.
The devil worshippers deny man's Divinity. The Protocols speak of
"beasts of prey that are called men." (114) They want us to become
beasts iof burden. This is why the media constantly appeals to our
animal qualities with pornography, violence, and immorality.
The Protocols is a long-term plan for world dictatorship.
"Before us
is a strategic plan from which we cannot deviate without seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught." (124)
No behavior is too vile to accomplish this goal.
"We must not stop
at bribery, deceit and treachery..." Indeed assassination and terror
"and the programme of violence and make-believe" are embraced. (118)
Might makes right.
"By the law of nature, right lies in force."
(114)
The Protocols say that the aristocracy was the people's only
defense
against the depredations of the Satanists. Thus they destroyed it by
proclaiming spurious ideals such as "fraternity, liberty and
equality." The foolish goyim did not see that "in nature there is no
equality" and that the "non-adept... understands nothing of the
political" and is unfit to rule. (119, emphasis mine)
Idealistic-sounding principles are used to deceive and manipulate
the goyim. "One must know how to use [political freedom] as a bait
whenever it appears necessary to attract the masses " for the
purpose of crushing authority. (114)
With the aristocracy gone, the Satanists form an invisible
government by bribing politicians and cultural leaders with fame and
fortune. (Lyndon Johnson once remarked that he felt like the most
popular girl at the brothel.)
"We have in our service persons of all opinions, of all
doctrines...each boring away at the last remnants of
authority...striving to overthrow all established forms of order. By
these acts all states are in torture... but we will not give them
peace until they openly acknowledge our international
Super-Government, and with submissiveness."(138)
CONCLUSION
Mankind can be likened to a sick organism infected by a deadly
pestilence.
Wittingly or unwittingly, our corporate, political and cultural
elites are in the thrall of Satanists. Don't be deceived by current
economic abundance. Wealth may be repossessed in a moment simply by
quickly raising interest rates to high levels.
We suffer from an infirmity of will when it comes to the central
issues of life: our children's future and the fate of mankind.
Unless there is a spiritual revival, mankind will continue to
succumb to a Reign of Evil.
Back to Contents
'Elders of Zion' Shape Our Culture
September 08, 2003
Like the blind man trying to describe an elephant, I am just
beginning to appreciate the true dimensions of evil in the world.
The problem is much more profound than I thought.
Since the so-called "Enlightenment" in the 1700's, Western culture
has been based on a Lucifer-like rejection of God.
The Enlightenment actually refers to Lucifer, the "light giver."
Lucifer symbolizes the light of the human intellect, the defiant
assertion that man can go it alone.
Luciferians have an uncanny knack for making evil appear good, and
good appear evil. For them, Lucifer represents the principle of
good. He is the equal of the Christian God whom they describe as
evil. The two exist together like light and darkness.
Christianity holds that man's salvation lies in doing God's will,
not his own. For Christians, Lucifer represents man's rejection of
God's Plan with predictably tragic results. Despite the lip service
we still pay to God, modern western culture is fundamentally
anti-Christian. It is Luciferian.
Our culture is premised on a tragic metaphysical revolt and a futile
attempt to substitute sensual and material for spiritual
fulfillment.
We cannot feel good without being good but Luciferians have deceived
us into thinking we can. They have us implicated in our own demise.
HOW IT WORKS
God's Plan (universal love) naturally conflicts with the desire of a
few to monopolize the world's wealth and power. Luciferians in the
service of wealth engineered the so-called Enlightenment, as well as
the Revolutionary Period (1776-1917) that toppled kings and the two
World Wars (1919-1945) that ruined the great nations of Europe.
Luciferians made people think they were orphans in the universe by
promoting Isaac Newton's mechanistic vision. When Newton's
laboratory papers were finally examined, his actual "scientific
work" turned out to be lurid and insane experiments in "black
magic." Along with Isaac Newton,
Lyndon LaRouche lists Francis
Bacon, Hobbs, Walpole, Doestoevsky, Nietzsche, Jeremy Betham, John
Ruskin, Bertram Russell, HG Wells as secret Satanists who have
shaped our culture.
The party of revolution and "progress" has been the party of
Lucifer. It is backed by influential Jewish Luciferians.
"Through
the press we have gained the power to influence while remaining
ourselves in the shade, " says the Protocols of the Elders of Zion
(Fry,122).
"The goyim have lost the habit of thinking unless
prompted by the suggestion of our specialists." (124)
"Think of the successes we arranged for Darwinianism, Marxism,
Nietzcheism...it should be plain to see what a disintegrating effect
these directives have had on the minds of the goyim." (121)
The Jewish Luciferians are savvy enough to believe in God (but not
to obey Him.) This is revealed in their use of the concept of
"freedom" to manipulate the masses.
"The word 'freedom' brings out ...men to fight against...every kind
of authority, even against God and the laws of nature. For this
reason we, when we come into our kingdom, shall have to erase this
word from the lexicon of life as implying a principle of brute force
which turns mobs into bloodthirsty beasts." (126)
The Elders of Zion say that freedom is viable when it rests,
"upon
the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of
humanity...This is why [we must] undermine all faith [in the]
Godhead and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical
calculations and material needs...Thus, all nations will be
swallowed up in pursuit of gain and...will not take note of their
common foe."
"This intensified struggle...will create, nay, has already created
disenchanted, cold and heartless communities...Their only guide is
gain, that is Gold, which they will erect into a veritable
cult..."(128)
Isn't our world confirmation of the authenticity of this document?
EQUALITY
What do the founders of Communism and class warfare really think
about social equality?
"When our kingdom comes [it will be] essential [to teach that] the
structure of human life requires division of labor and consequently
the division of men into classes and conditions...owing in the
difference in the objects of human activity there cannot be any
equality..." (124)
Similarly, feminism is not about giving power to women but actually
taking it away. Woman's real power lies in sexual surrender, which
they exchange for love (marriage). The Luciferians propose that
women should indulge in sex without love. Albert Pike, the leader of
19th Freemasonry advised his fellow masons:
"Woman fetters thee by thy desires; we say to the adept, ...use
women often and without passion; thou wilt thus become master of thy
passions and thou wilt enchain woman." (Occult Theocracy, p.234)
According to Lyndon Larouche, "reducing sexual practises to the
level of bestiality is a crucial feature of Satanism in all
historical periods..."
THE MARQUIS DE SADE
"Young maidens, do not defend your virtue," the Marquis de Sade
advised.
Sade gave his name to sadism, which is the same as Satanism. Once
discussed in horrified whispers, Sade is now often celebrated as a
"heroic apostle of individual rights, a giant of philosophical
thought, and a martyr for freedom of conscience." (Sade, A
Biographical Essay" by Laurence Bongie,2000)
The Hollywood film Quills (2001) portrays ordinary folk gathering
together to enjoy Sade's hard-core pornography as though it were a
wholesome songbook or the Sears Christmas catalogue. The young
heroine, a laundry girl played by Kate Winslett explains that
bondage and flagellation provides relief from her tedious chores. I
doubt if it helps her become a faithful wife or devoted mother.
"Let us give ourselves indiscriminately to everything our passions
suggest, and we will always be happy...
Conscience is not the voice
of Nature but only the voice of prejudice," Sade wrote.
This is what Luciferians want us to believe but the truth is that
real morality is not prejudice but a proven guide to health and
happiness.
Oscar Wilde contends that the only way to overcome temptation is to
succumb to it, but that assumes we will outgrow it. Satanists don't.
Sade was not imprisoned for his ideas but for "his
repeated...criminal sexual assaults on women" according to Laurence
Bongie. Hollywood bears responsibility for portraying him as a hero
but this hasn't stopped them from planning another eulogy for
homosexual pedophile Dr.
Alfred Kinsey who died from a disease
associated with self-abuse.
CONCLUSION
The triumph of immorality in popular culture is not random, not a
concession to popular taste, not commercially driven. The relentless
attack on wholesomeness is part of an insidious multi-century effort
to subvert mankind, a cosmic struggle for the soul of man.
God is beckoning us to discover our divinity, our destiny, and our
true bliss. But Luciferians do not intend for this to happen. They
are gradually converting mankind to their Satanic culture. They use
concepts such as free and equal to create a world that will be
anything but. They have recruited armies of well-intentioned people
whose careers depend on not seeing the big picture.
Let me leave you with this thought. What if the whole universe was
created so that God could one day know Himself through His creation?
What if we represented His most advanced work?
It's a heavy responsibility; one that mankind had better start
taking seriously.
Otherwise, we will miss our Divine Rendezvous, and may not get
another chance.
Back to Contents
Did Rothschild Write The Protocols of Zion?
September 21, 2003
Many people think "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is anti
Semitic "hate literature" and a fraud.
Nobel Prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote that the book
exhibits "the mind of genius." Pretty good for a hoax, wouldn't you
say?
 Solzhenitsyn said it exhibits,
"great strength of thought and
insight...Its design...(increasing freedom and liberalism, which is
terminated in social cataclysm)...is well above the abilities of an
ordinary mind...It is more complicated than a nuclear bomb."
I'm afraid Protocols may be genuine. They are lectures addressed to
Jewish Luciferians (Illuminati, Freemasons) detailing an incredible
plan to overthrow western civilization, subjugate mankind, and
concentrate "all the wealth of the world...in our hands."
The lectures, typical of similar Illuminati documents, were leaked
to the Czarist Secret police and published in Russia in 1905.
The issue of anti Semitism diverts attention from this plot which
has been unfolding for over 200 years and is behind world
government, September 11, Iraq, Homeland Security and the bogus "War
on Terror."
FAIT ACCOMPLI
The plotters control the world's wealth. Their multinational
corporations use Freemason symbols in their logos. Shell and
Citibank have the rising sun; Exxon the double cross, CBS and Time
Warner the eye of Horus; Alcan and AOL, the circle in the triangle.
Their mass media, education and politics all create an illusion of
democracy in order to control and defraud humanity. The Great Seal
of the United States reflects the unhappy truth. It is also a
Freemason symbol and bears the inscription "We have achieved New
World Order."
Almost all American Presidents including
George W.
Bush are Freemasons or Illuminati.
Israel's Star of David (interlaced triangles) is the Masonic symbol
of the double divinity, Adonai and Lucifer.
The issue of anti Semitism is irrelevant because Jewish and
non-Jewish Luciferians intermarried long ago. (See Milan Martin,
Lucifer's Children p.74) The elite now consists of humanity-haters
of all stripes. No wonder corruption is endemic. As the Greeks say,
"the fish rots from the head."
ROTHSCHILD
Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812) played a key role in advancing
this monstrous conspiracy. He was a follower of the occult Cabbalism
(or Lucifer worship) that is the basis of Illuminism and
Freemasonry. (See Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and
Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.)
Researchers have speculated that Adam Weishaupt or Asher Ginzberg
penned Protocols.At first I thought it was Rothschild himself. But
because someone pointed out that the book refers to Nietzche and
Darwin, it is more likely that Rothschild's grandson, Lionel Nathan
Rothschild (1809-1879) or someone like him, is the author. Lionel is
the infamous Jewish banker "Sidonia" of Benjamin D'Israeli's novel
Coningsby(1844).
I came to this conclusion after reading Protocols 20-23, the
"financial programme... the crowning and the decisive point of our
plans." These lectures require a detailed knowledge of finance and
profound psychological insight. Moreover the author states that all
power ultimately will reside in the "King of the Jews," which is how
the Rothschilds were known. In general the Protocols provide a
compelling explanation of world events as they have transpired.
THE SOURCE OF POWER
The author makes clear that whoever creates money is sovereign. He
ridicules the goyim kings for forfeiting this power and says that he
doesn't intend to repeat this mistake.
"When we come into our
Kingdom," the government will change from being "a payer of tribute
by loan operations...into a lender at a profit."
"This measure will stop the stagnation of money, parasitic profits,
and idleness which were useful for us among the goyim so long as
they were independent but are not desirable under our rule."
The Protocols is full of Talmudic contempt for non-Jews.
"How clear
is the undeveloped power of thought of the purely brute brains of
the goyim...What could have been simpler than to take the money they
wanted from their own people? "
...We "will put an end to those
abuses to which we owe our mastery over the goyim, but which cannot
be allowed in our Kingdom." (178)
(I am using the L. Fry edition of The Protocols, entitled
Waters
Flowing Eastward, available from gsgbooks@mindspring.com)
COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, LIBERALISM, FEMINISM
Similarly the bankers have financed intellectuals and politicians to
promote a mania for "senseless utopian principles" like
"collectivism," "freedom of conscience, equality and the like."
(182) They are designed to bring down the Old Order but will have no
place in the New.
"We have set them on the hobbyhorse of an idea about the absorption
of individuality by the symbolic unit of collectivism...They have
never yet and they never will reflect that this hobbyhorse is a
manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has
established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike
another and precisely for the purpose of instituting
individuality..." (159)
"The purely brute mind of the goyim is incapable of analysis and
observation and still more of foreseeing whither a certain matter of
settling a question may trend...Their eyes are open but see nothing
before them..." (160)
"Everything in this world is in a state of submission, if not to
man, then to ... what is stronger. And so shall we be this something
stronger for the sake of good." (163)
THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION
Estonian journalist Juri Lina has examined the recently opened
Soviet archives and documented the connection between the Bolshevik
Revolution and Jewish Illuminism in his book "Under the Sign of the
Scorpion." (1994)
I will probably devote a separate column to this. Suffice to say
that Communism was the outcome of the plan outlined in Protocols. No
wonder this book was banned in the USSR on pain of death! Its status
in America is a measure of our condition.
Karl Marx, Lenin and Trotsky, all Jewish Freemasons, were
essentially dysfunctional losers who were employed by the Illuminist
bankers to hoodwink the masses. Lenin for example had been an
unsuccessful lawyer who had only six cases in which he defended
shoplifters. He lost them all. A week later he gave up the law to
become a highly paid revolutionary.
Lenin declared: "Peace means quite simply the domination of
Communism over the entire world." His reign of terror caused nine
million deaths but you never see him compared to Hitler. The secret
police, the Cheka, dominated by Jews, published the names of 1.7
million people they murdered in 1918-1919, including 300,000
priests.
"A river of blood flowed through Russia," Lina writes. "According to
official Soviet Reports, 1,695,904 people were executed from January
1921 to April 1922. Among these victims were bishops, professors,
doctors, officers, policemen, lawyers, civil servants,
writers...Their crime was 'anti social thinking' " (90)
CONCLUSION
Jews will never understand anti Semitism until they realize that it
is not always based on irrational prejudice.
In 1920, Winston Churchill made a distinction between national and
"International Jews." He said the latter are behind,
"a worldwide
conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstitution
of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious
malevolence, and impossible equality...
It played ... a part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has
been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the
Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band ...[has] gripped the
Russian people by the hair and have become practically the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire."
Our culture, not Protocols, is a hoax. Luciferian Communist Jews set
an example for the Nazis. This is not a debating contest where I
convince you to agree with me or vice versa. I am concerned only
with the historical record. Our focus must be on establishing the
truth.
Luciferians like Rothschild, Lenin and Hitler still control the
planet and intend to enslave humanity. I'm afraid that this will
become increasingly evident. I pray I am wrong. This is a debate I
want to lose.
Back to Contents
Protocols Forgery Argument is Flawed
December 14, 2003
Next to the Bible, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is perhaps the
mostly widely read book in the world.
Published in Russia in 1903, it purports to be the leaked master
plan for "Jewish world domination." It is the kind of thing that
would be studied at secret workshops of an occult society.
In different ways, both Zionists and Nazis have made it synonymous
with virulent anti Semitism and genocide.
But surely Jews should not be blamed for the machinations of a tiny
secret society. The vast majority of Jews would disavow this master
plan if they believed it
 existed.
Surely one can condemn all racism and genocide in the strongest
possible terms and still believe the Protocols are authentic.
In my opinion, the equation with anti Semitism is really a ploy to
divert attention away from this master plan.
The plagiarism claim is part of a propaganda campaign waged by
conscious and unconscious collaborators in academia and the media.
THE FORGERY CLAIM
We are told that The Protocols of Zion is a hoax, a "proven forgery"
concocted by the Tsarist Political Police (the Okhrana) to incite
anti Semitism and discredit revolutionaries.
But the "proof" is far from convincing.
It consists of
three
articles published in The London Times (August
16-18, 1921) by Philip Graves.
According to Graves, Protocols is a crude, chapter-by-chapter
plagiarism of Maurice Joly's Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli
and Montesquieu (1864).
It was easy to make this claim while Joly's book was unavailable.
Napolean III's police confiscated it as soon as it was published.
But it is available now and I invite you to compare the two texts.
In my opinion, they are entirely different in tone, content and
purpose. At 140 pages, Dialogues is twice as long as Protocols. Most
of it finds no echo in the Protocols.
The crux of Graves' argument is that certain references and passages
in Protocols were lifted from Dialogues. He claims there are 50 of
these and produces about a dozen.
Their striking resemblance to Protocols leaves little doubt that the
author did refer to the Dialogues as part of his research. He had no
compunction about borrowing or reshaping a few passages that struck
his fancy.
Indeed Philip Graves is "struck by the absence of any effort on the
part of the plagiarist to conceal his plagiarisms."
That's because he had nothing to hide.
He was not Graves' "unimportant precis-writer employed by the court
or by the Okhrana" to construct a hoax.
He was a diabolical genius crafting an original work. It is
simplistic and disingenuous to characterize Protocols as a hoax.
POLITICAL PROVENANCE
Graves' article smacks of a Zionist propaganda operation. Graves
"expose" of Protocols appeared in August 1921 when Zionists were
pressing the League of Nations to turn Palestine into a Jewish
homeland under British Mandate.
Philip Grave tells the unlikely story that a "Mr. X" brought the
Dialogues to him in Constantinople where he was the Times'
correspondent. Mr. X presented it as "irrefutable proof" that the
Protocols are a plagiarism.
Mr. X was a White Russian, which seems incredible given the Jewish
role in the Bolshevik Revolution. He claims he bought the book from,
get this, "a former member of the Okhrana" who had fled to
Constantinople.
In The Controversy of Zion, (Chapter 34) Douglas Reed, a Times'
staffer at the time, provides additional background.
In May 1920, Lord Northcliffe, a part owner of The Times, printed an
article about the Protocols entitled "The Jewish Peril, A Disturbing
Pamphlet, A Call for an Enquiry. " It concluded:
"An impartial investigation of these would-be documents and their
history is most desirable...are we to dismiss the whole matter
without inquiry and to let the influence of such a book as this work
unchecked?"
Then in May 1922 Northcliffe visited Palestine and wrote that
Britain had been too hasty to promise it to the Jewish people when
in fact it belonged to 700,000 Muslim Arab residents.
Mr. Wickham Steed, the editor of The Times of London in 1921 refused
to print the article and Northcliffe tried to get him fired.
Somehow Steed was able to have Northcliffe declared "insane" and
committed. Later Northcliffe complained he was being poisoned and
died suddenly in 1922.
Douglas Reed was Northcliffe's secretary but didn't learn of these
events until they appeared in the Official History of the Times in
the 1950's.
Clearly Northcliffe had offended some "big boys" when he opposed the
British Mandate in Palestine. Why was it so important?
Israel is intended to be the capital of the Masonic World
Government. They are already constructing the infrastructure. See
"The Roots of Evil in Jerusalem."
THE FORGERY CLAIM IN MORE DETAIL
Philip Graves and the other apologists are incorrect to claim the
Protocols plagiarize the Dialogues chapter by chapter.
Graves writes that,
"the Seventh Dialogue...corresponds with the
fifth, sixth, seventh and part of the eighth Protocol."
At eight pages, these Protocols are twice as long as the Seventh
Dialogue.
They mostly contain material not in the Seventh Dialogue, or
anywhere else. I will list a few examples from Protocol Five alone.
Protocol Five says "our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism
of such magnificent proportions" that it will "wipe out any goyim
who oppose us by deed or word."
In contrast Seventh Dialogue says, "Death, expropriation and torture
should only play a minor role in the internal politics of modern
states."
Protocols Five says we "robbed [the goyim] of their faith in God"
and "insinuated into their minds the conception of their own rights"
thereby undermining the authority of Kings. There is nothing
comparable in Dialogue Seven.
Protocol Five says,
"we shall so wear down the goyim that they will
be compelled to offer us international power [allowing us] gradually
to absorb all State forces of the world and to form a
Super-Government."
There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
Protocol Five says the "engine" of all states is "in our hands" and
that engine is "Gold." "We were chosen by God Himself to rule over
the whole earth." There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
ON THE OTHER HAND
The author of Protocols does select a few passages or references
from Dialogues that appear unaltered (see Graves) or in different
form.
For example, the Dialogues' say: " Everywhere might precedes right.
Political liberty is merely a relative idea. The need to live is
what dominates states as it does individuals."
In Protocols this becomes,
"From the law of nature right lies in
might. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact, and one must
know how to use it [political freedom] as a bait whenever it appears
necessary to attract the masses ... to one's party for the purpose
of crushing another who is in authority." (Protocols 1)
Graves leaves out the last part to make the resemblance seem greater
than it is.
Dialogues (7) say, "Revolutionary ferment which is suppressed in
one's own country should be incited throughout Europe."
In Protocols (7) "Throughout all Europe ... we must create ferments,
discords, hostilities." There is no reference to suppressing these
in one's own country.
The author of Protocols is not a forger creating a hoax, but a
conspirator forging an original work.
SAME GENRE, DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS
Both books belong to the "immoral school" of political theory.
Machiavelli pays homage to a long list of rulers "who are
progenitors of my doctrine." Both preach might makes right, "good"
comes from evil, and the end justifies the means.
But the similarity ends there. The tone of the Dialogues is dry and
theoretical. It is a debate between fictional political theorists:
Montesquieu a champion of democracy and Machiavelli, a champion of
tyranny. Dialogues is considered a critique of the reign of Napoleon
III.
Montesquieu asks how to quell the spirit of anarchy in society.
Machiavelli prescribes a "monster called the state" which maintains
a democratic artifice but is actually controlled by the "Prince." He
talks about how to suppress secret societies.
On the other hand, the tone of Protocols is frankly conspiratorial
and subversive and pays homage to Lucifer. Protocols is a "strategic
plan from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing
the labour of many centuries come to naught." (Protocol 1)
We are struck by a sense of relevance when reading Protocols. We
immediately recognize its baneful influence in today's world.
PROPAGANDA
Since Graves' articles, there have been a few books arguing the
"forgery" thesis. The latest is Norman Cohn, Warrant for Genocide
(1970).
Graves and Cohn admit that "the Financial Programme" (Protocols
20-24) which the author calls "the crowning and decisive point of
our plans" is largely original.
For serious researchers, Australian researcher
Peter Myers presents
pro and con views.
Goebbels said that propaganda is effective only when the reader
doesn't realize it is propaganda. It follows that dupes write the
best propaganda. For example, see
Rick Salutin, Protocols of Zion's
Critics.
CONCLUSION
One hundred million people were slaughtered in the last century but
no one considers the possibility that the human race might have been
subverted.
War is hell but no one thinks Satan worshipers might be behind it.
I suspect the Second World War was a battle for racial superiority
between Jewish and Aryan wings of the Illuminati who in fact are
united at the top.
The private central bankers of England, the U.S. and Nazi Germany
made the war possible. They worked as one at the Bank of
International Settlements in Switzerland. (See Charles Higham,
Trading With the Enemy.)
The purpose of the war was to degrade, defraud and demoralize
humanity. The Holocaust provided a rationale for the establishment
of Israel as headquarters of the New World Order. Aryans, Jews and
many others were sacrificed and exploited.
In my opinion, the outlawing of Protocols on pain of death in
Bolshevik Russia and its execration in the West today proves its
authenticity.
Mankind is in the grip of a diabolical conspiracy. In order to make
good people do bad things, truth must be tailored to fit the
political purpose. This is Communist and feminist teaching.
I would like to be proven wrong, but in the case of Protocols, the
"forgery" argument is propaganda.
Back to Contents
The Protocols of Zion Updated
February 15, 2004
In 1976, the plan for "Jewish world domination" outlined in
The
Protocols of the Elders of Zion had been largely realized. Harold
Wallace Rosenthal, 29, a personal assistant to New York Senator
Jacob Javits felt that Jewish power was so unassailable that he
could make some extra cash by telling this story to
 Walter White
Jr., the editor of the Conservative monthly Western Front.
"Too many Jews do not have the guts to tell you how we live and
plan, but I am not intimated by anything or anyone," Rosenthal told
White.
"It is too late for your Christian followers to put up a
defense.
That time is long past. Long, long ago we had to become the
aggressors! That is undoubtedly one of our great purposes in life.
We are aggressors!"
This shocking
17-page interview, which contradicts the Jewish image
as victims, has been online for some time. It ranks with the
revelations of
Benjamin Freedman, and
C.G. Rakovsky as a description
of the real forces directing the world.
Rosenthal needed gambling money but his candor cost him his life. On
Aug. 12, 1976, he was killed in a foiled skyjacking in Istanbul.
Walter White concluded that the incident was a cover for Rosenthal's
murder.
A commemorative Rosenthal "Fellowship in International Relations"
discreetly furthers the work he indiscreetly exposed. Oddly,
there
is no picture of Rosenthal on their web site.
The interview is virulently anti Semitic in the sense that both men
characterize this conspiracy as "Jewish" and make many nasty racist
generalizations. In fact, "the Jews" are really
the Rothschilds and
a few hundred banking families and their non-Jewish allies united by
intermarriage and occult beliefs. The vast majority of Jews like
other people are unaware of this plot and would oppose it if they
were. Jews are as much its unwitting dupes and victims as anyone
else.
The Rothschilds set up
the Illuminati in 1776 to subvert the
Christian basis of Western Civilization. They took over much of
Freemasonry and used it to infiltrate all social institutions.
Mouthing words like "freedom," "equality" and "progress," they are
bent on melding family, race, religion, and nation into a malleable
mush. Their world police state, now called "globalization," lies
behind the facade of "The Patriot Act" and "The War on Terror."
Rosenthal says,
"Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is
Lucifer...and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive."
This statement applies to modern culture as a whole. We do not like
to admit that our "secular" society is based on a cosmic rebellion
against God. Its true satanic character is becoming more evident
every day.
INSIGHTS
Rosenthal says the "Jews" have built an earthly empire partly by
rejecting Christ's vision of a spiritual kingdom based on brotherly
love. Jewish bankers plan to govern the world from Jerusalem
according to their own interests.
He says the Jewish religion is essentially a disguise for a racial
imperative.
"We can live among other people and states [by]
persuading them that the Jews are not a distinct people but the
representatives of a religious faith..."
"Jewish" power was created through control of the monetary system.
"Through our national bank, the Federal Reserve, we extend book
credit which we create from nothing to all local banks ...[Thus] we
bring industry, management and labour into our debt...and pit
management against labour so they will never unite and attack us and
usher in a debt-free industrial utopia."
Through control of banking, the "Jews" acquired a total monopoly of,
"the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing
television media...we took over the publication of all school
materials... Even your music! We censor the songs released for
publication long before they reach the publishers...we will have
complete control of your thinking."
He boasts that they even implanted a "guilt complex" over the
Holocaust and anti Semitism that prevents society from addressing
the problem.
"We Jews have put issue upon issue to the American people. Then we
promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns. With their eyes
fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene. We
Jews toy with the American public as a cat toys with a mouse."
Rosenthal avers that society can only escape this death clutch by
violent action not education.
"History has been written in blood, not with ink. No letter,
editorial or book has ever rallied the people or stopped tyranny. We
understand this principle and are forever propagandizing the people
to write letters to the President, to Congress...Woe be unto us if
they ever see the futility of it, lay down the pen and employ the
sword."
But Rosenthal is not worried. Alluding to the promotion of feminism
and homosexuality, he says:
"We have castrated society through fear and intimidation. Its
manhood exists only in combination with a feminine outward
appearance. Being so neutered, the populace has become docile and
easily ruled. As all geldings...their thoughts are not involved with
the concerns of the future and their posterity, but only with the
present and with the next meal."
Rosenthal talks about how a "Jewish" invisible government also
controls the USSR, and how the UN is "nothing but a trap door to the
Red World's immense concentration camp." He says this invisible
power is responsible for the wars and revolutions of the last 200
years.
At times the interview seems almost too damning, and we wonder if it
is authentic. Why would someone who says he aspires to national
prominence allow such an interview to be taped? Couldn't he be
blackmailed? He makes many unflattering and untrue generalizations
about Jews, which also seems implausible. At times he veers widely
from arrogance to insecurity. At one point, he says Jews have made
plans to pack up and flee.
Ultimately you will make up your own mind. I believe the
contradictions are due to self-hatred and a subconscious desire for
expiation. The interview contains many insights only an insider
could have, for eg. the references to Lucifer, religion/race and
violent change. They are consistent with my information.
The tone of racial arrogance also rings true. Rosenthal expresses
incredulity at the spinelessness and gullibility of the American
people. He says a Jew remains a Jew whether he converts to another
religion or not. I doubt if a Christian Conservative like Walter
White would pull off the kind of stunt he condemns "the Jews" for
doing.
CONCLUSION
Walter White seems to think the "Jews" are the "ringleaders" of the
Luciferianism cabal known as "Mystery Babylon." Certainly the
Rothschilds are central players but the cast is large and includes
many others.
By presenting this information, I am trying to inspire Jews and
non-Jews alike to remove the media blindfold and recognize that
Luciferians have hijacked humanity and modern culture largely is a
fraud designed to disguise this fact.
True culture is based on religion, i.e. a collective commitment to
spiritual ideals such as absolute justice, love, beauty and truth.
"God is a Spirit and we worship him in Spirit and in Truth," Christ
said. (John 4:24)
We are living in the twilight of Christian culture. We have no
genuine ideals to take its place. The elite's Orwellian doublespeak
(selectively applied "freedom", "tolerance," "diversity," "human
rights" and "equality") is manipulation and mind control.
Jews will have to disown organized Jewry, which is controlled by the
bankers. Fifty per cent of American Jews do not identify with
Judaism in any way. The number that converted to another religion
more than doubled since 1990 and now represents 25% of the total.
However most Jews, like non-Jews, are "secular humanists" which is
Luciferianism in disguise. Humanism is the notion that man can build
a utopia based on "reason." In practice, humanism is a front for the
Illuminist bankers and their allies.
Reason cannot be divorced from morality. Remember I am the inventor
of Scruples.
"You find a wallet containing $3000. By the address you
can tell the owner is wealthy. Your family is hungry. Do you keep
the money?"
That would be reasonable.
Humanism holds that man is already divine and therefore free to
indulge his appetites and reject God's Plan. This is what the
humanist means when he preaches "freedom."
In fact humanity is still very much a work in progress. We were put
on earth to embody God's Plan, (i.e. spiritual ideals.) God did not
give us freedom so we could fail.
(Note: On Nov. 29 2005 I had a telephone conversation with Des
Griffin who told me that he was invited to Walter White's house in
CA and listened to the tape of the interview. The Rosenthal
character in the interview sounded like a bad actor reading from a
script. Certain words were repeated. He says the information is
totally credible but the conspiracy is real and does not need to be
embellished by fraud.)
Back to Contents
|