| 
			 
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Chapter 8 
			
			The Culture of Stones 
			
			  
			
			 
			Magic and Megaliths 
			
			 
			We want to turn back now to the many sculptures of female Goddesses 
			found in the most ancient archaeological levels. According to the 
			experts, the discernible idea of the religion of the Goddess is that 
			of an infinite bounty of the Great Mother. It is proposed that such 
			peoples didn’t engage in agriculture because the idea of “owning 
			land” may have been abhorrent to them. The idea of “forcing” the 
			earth to yield, rather than accepting the natural abundance the 
			Goddess provided was simply not a part of their philosophy.  
			
			  
			
			Their 
			Goddess was a Star Being, and she was worshipped in outdoor Temples 
			that were laid out along Celestial Archetypes. But it may be that 
			“worshipping the Goddess” in the terms we understand worship was not 
			precisely what was going on in these temples. Why do I say this? 
			Well, because there was something else VERY mysterious about these 
			ancient peoples  -  they seem to have had “super powers”. In a 
			previous chapter, we looked at Dr. Robert Schoch’s work on the 
			underwater pyramids off Japan known as 
			
			the Yonaguni Monuments. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Schoch noted the odd fact that there were no “quarry marks” on the 
			stones of the underwater structure. From this, he concluded that 
			they couldn’t be manmade. But he ought to have considered other 
			great stone cities where there is often a similar lack of evidence 
			of our present quarrying technology.  
			
			  
			
			Morris Jessup wrote extensively 
			about the megalithic structures in his book 
			
			The Case for the UFO, 
			concluding that, based on his own knowledge and experience, many of 
			them seemed to have been fitted by a process of “grinding in situ”. 
			This, of course, would necessitate a means of handling stone that is 
			completely outside the range of our present understanding.  
			
			  
			
			He then 
			makes a remarkable observation: 
			
				
				It may be that this tremendous power was limited in its application 
			to articles of stone texture only, but this is a little doubtful. 
			Or, perhaps it was limited to nonmagnetic materials in general. Such 
			a limitation would have sidetracked the development of a mechanized 
			culture such as ours of this day, and would partly account for the strange fact that almost all 
			relics of the profound past are nonmetallic. 
				168 
			 
			
			It is a fact that the Earth is literally blanketed with megaliths 
			from some ancient civilization. Tens of thousands of them!  
			
			  
			
			There are 
			variations in placement and style, but the thing they all have in 
			common is their incredible size and their undeniable antiquity. Many 
			scholars attempt to place them within recorded history by digging 
			around them and shouting “aha!”, when they find something that can 
			be dated within the current scheme of human history. It is now 
			understood by the experts that the megalithic structures demanded 
			complex architectural planning, and they propose that it was the 
			labor of tens of thousands of men working for centuries. 
			
			 
			No one has ever made a systematic count of the megaliths, but the 
			estimate goes beyond 50,000. It is also admitted that this figure 
			represents only a fraction, since many have been destroyed not only 
			by the forces of nature, but also by the wanton destruction of man. 
			
			 
			Even though there are megalithic monuments in locations around the 
			world, there is nothing anywhere else like there is in Europe. The 
			megaliths of Europe form an “enormous blanket of stone”. Great 
			mounds of green turf or gleaming white quartz pebbles formerly 
			covered many of them. The quartz is, of course, electrically active. 
			 
			
			  
			
			The megalithic mania of ancient Europe is: 
			
				
				Unparalleled indeed in human history. For there has never been 
			anything like this rage, almost mania, for megalith building, except 
			perhaps during the centuries after AD 1000 when much the same part 
			of Europe was covered with what a monk of the time called a ‘white 
			mantle of churches.’ […] 
				  
				
				The megaliths, then, were raised by some of the earliest Europeans. 
			The reason that this simple fact took so long to be accepted was the 
			peculiar inferiority complex which western Europeans had about their 
			past. Their religion, their laws, their cultural heritage, their 
			very numerals, all come from the East.  
				  
				
				The inhabitants, before civilization came flooding in from the Mediterranean, were 
			illiterate; they kept no records, they built no cities. It was easy 
			to assume that they were simply bands of howling half-naked savages 
			who painted their bodies, put bear-grease on their hair and ate 
			their cousins.169 
				 
			 
			
			168 Jessup, Morris K., 
			The Case For The UFO (New York: Bantam Books 1955) p. 148. 
			 
			
			169 
			Reader’s Digest, The World’s Last Mysteries, 1977. 
			
			  
			
			The whys and wherefores of this “megalith mania” 
			are still under debate. The fact is: you can’t date stones. Yes, you 
			can date things found around them, or near them, or under them, but 
			you can’t date the stones. 
			
			 
			The interesting thing about the megalith builders is that the 
			peoples who were able to perform these utterly amazing feats of 
			engineering are still, in most circles, considered to be barbarians 
			because they did not build cities, engage in agriculture, develop the wheel, 
			or writing. Yet, they did something that clearly cannot be, and was 
			not, done by “civilized” peoples who did all of those “civilized” 
			things. They had some sort of “power” that we cannot replicate and 
			do not understand. 
			
			 
			I would like to speculate here for a moment. The first thing that 
			comes to my mind when I consider the problem of the megaliths is 
			that of what I call “payoff”. That is to say, nobody who is human 
			ever does anything without a “payoff”, or to put it more generally, 
			for a reason, Colin Renfrew and his “Big Chief Theory” 
			notwithstanding.170 What could be the reason for the stones?  
			
			  
			
			170 We discussed briefly Renfrew’s theory in the last chapter. 
			
			  
			
			There 
			were clearly a great deal more of them than would be necessary for 
			simple “monumental” or “worship” purposes, or even time keeping, as 
			recent researchers have suggested. They appear to be arranged like 
			the inner workings of some vast global machine whose purpose is an 
			enigma to us. For example, at Carnac in Brittany, 3,000 menhirs 
			formed thirteen parallel lines, sprawled across four miles of the 
			French countryside. 
			
			 
			At the same time, could the overabundant presence of these 
			megaliths, their “machine-like” arrangement, have anything to do 
			with the things that are observed to be “lacking” in these peoples, 
			i.e. the signs of civilization: the wheel, agriculture, writing and 
			cities? Might we suppose the reason for the stones and the reason 
			for the absence of evidence of what we, today, call civilization, 
			are identical?  
			
			  
			
			And since they are found in all the same areas as 
			megaliths exist, might we also suppose that very corpulent women 
			represented in the thousands of carvings had some relationship to 
			these mystical powers as well? I am just observing what is evident 
			based on long periods of contemplating these structures and 
			artifacts. If we sit down before them without any preconceived 
			notions and try to imagine ourselves participating in the life of 
			the people for whom they were a natural and necessary part of the 
			landscape, and put that together with what we know about our own 
			civilization, we come to some very startling ideas. 
			
			 
			It is a matter of observation that cities developed in agricultural 
			societies as a central place to manufacture and exchange goods. 
			Agriculture is required to feed stable and static populations. 
			Wheels are needed to both transport people and goods in cities and 
			from agricultural zones to cities and back. Writing is needed to 
			keep records of transactions, as is demonstrated by the clear 
			evidence of the earliest forms of writing: endless lists and tallies 
			of grain and cattle. And, writing was used for another reason: to 
			record and promulgate the exploits of certain Gods and Goddesses as 
			well as keeping track of all the goods tithed to the temple and 
			priesthood. 
			 
			So, suppose none of this was needed? Suppose a civilization existed 
			that did not need cities, agriculture, wheels or writing? That is 
			not to say that they did not produce goods en masse, nor that they 
			did not produce food for large groups, or that they did not travel 
			over vast distances or record their exploits.  
			
			  
			
			But, suppose they did 
			not do it in the way we would expect? Suppose the STONES DID IT ALL? 
			
			 
			What do I mean? 
			
			 
			It may very well be that the “worship” of the ancients was not 
			worship in the terms we understand it; it was a technology based on 
			cosmic energy, having something to do with the stars as markers of 
			periods of time in which cosmic rays could be collected, and 
			utilizing stones in interaction with the human body, possibly very 
			large women, to produce whatever the tribe needed.  
			
			  
			
			For those of you 
			who are science fiction fans, simply think of a modified function of 
			The Navigator in the book and movie Dune. It ought not to be lost on 
			the reader that one of the titles of the Goddess Isis, as well as 
			other divine beings, is “The Navigator”. Another point about the 
			Goddess image of Isis is the odd construction on her head that is 
			called the “throne”. The term “seated” is regularly used in 
			conjunction with Goddess images, and in archaic times, kingship was 
			bestowed by marriage to the representative of the Goddess. 
			
			 
			Worship of the moon is recorded in the oldest literatures of Egypt, 
			Babylonia, India, and China - and is still practiced today in various 
			parts of the world, particularly among certain African and Native 
			American groups. The experts will tell us that Moon worship is 
			founded on the belief that the phases of the moon and the growth and 
			decline of plant, animal, and human life are related. In some 
			societies food was laid out at night to absorb the rays of the moon, 
			which were thought to have power to cure disease and prolong life. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Among the Baganda of central Africa it was customary for a mother to 
			bathe her newborn child by the light of the first full moon. The 
			moon has also been associated with wisdom and justice, as in the 
			worship of the Egyptian God Thoth and the Mesopotamian God Sin. The 
			moon has also been the basis for many amorous legends and some 
			superstitions (madmen were once considered to be moonstruck, hence 
			the term lunatic). This is just the short version because entire 
			libraries could be filled with books on the mythology of the Moon 
			and related subjects. 
			
			 
			The interesting points are that the rays of the moon were anciently 
			thought to have the power to cure disease and prolong life and 
			confer wisdom. These are motifs of both the Holy Grail and the 
			Philosopher’s Stone.  
			
			  
			
			And this brings us to another most interesting 
			idea of Morris Jessup. 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			Morris Jessup and Gravitational Nodes 
			
			 
			The reader familiar with Jessup’s work will know that he died under 
			very mysterious circumstances, and his death was the platform upon 
			which the “legend” of the “Philadelphia Experiment“ was founded. 
			This story is about Secret Government experiments in radar 
			invisibility that resulted in 
			
			Time Travel/manipulation. It is too 
			much to go into here and now, and not totally relevant to our 
			subject, but we will say that, after much research and tracking of 
			clues, we have concluded that Jessup was most likely murdered - but 
			that it wasn’t for the reasons 
			that most people think.  
			
			  
			
			We believe that he was killed to give 
			“substance” to the diversionary story of the Philadelphia 
			Experiment, which is, in our opinion, designed to promulgate 
			disinformation AND distract attention away from certain observations 
			that he made in his book, cited above. 
			
			 
			Jessup points out that UFOs have been sighted and recorded by human 
			beings for thousands of years, and he cites these reports in detail. 
			He informs us that some of the oldest and richest sources of such 
			reports are records of Indian and Tibetan monasteries. He notes that 
			records suggesting sightings 15,000 to 70,000 years ago are to be 
			found there, and these, as well as a report from the court records 
			of Thutmose III that has been, dated to approximately 1500 BC, are 
			quite similar to the reports of the present day. 
			
			 
			Jessup then moves to the many sightings made by skeptical 
			astronomers, of which I have a collection myself. Their observations 
			are quantitative and documented as to time and conditions of 
			observation.  
			
			  
			
			The astronomers, though unable to explain what they 
			were seeing, nevertheless faithfully recorded all details utilizing 
			whatever equipment was available to them at the various periods when 
			the observations were made. Simultaneous observations by two or more 
			observers have at times established the approximate distances of the 
			UFOs through the study of parallax calculations.171 It was these 
			observations, with certain specific data included, that provided the 
			details upon which Jessup formulated his idea.  
			
			  
			
			171 “Parallax” is the displacement, often measurable, caused by 
			looking at an object from two different points; e.g. hold up a 
			finger and view it with first one eye and then the other. The 
			displacement against a distinct background is parallax. 
			
			  
			
			He called it the 
			“habitat of the UFOs”. 
			
				
				Refinements of Bode’s law indicate nodes in the gravitational field, 
			at which planets, asteroids, and possibly comets and meteors tend to 
			locate themselves. An extension of the theory to the satellite 
			systems of the major planets indicates a similar system of nodes on 
			smaller scales, where planets, rather than the sun, are 
			gravitational centers. …it might well be that these gravitational 
			nodes are occupied to some degree by navigable constructions.[…] 
				  
				
				We can, therefore, take it as highly probable that there are many 
			zones of convenience around the planets, as well as around the sun, 
			which are presently unoccupied by planets or satellites of any 
			considerable size and which may well be used by enlightened space 
			dwellers. Such zones, if they exist, are in addition to the 
			demonstrable earth-sun-moon neutral. 
				
				 Since this system of nodes appears to be some function of the radius 
			of the attracting body, it may be that there is a complete series of 
			them in concentric circles starting at the surface of a parent body 
			such as the earth, but their existence or true nature can hardly be 
			known to us until we can in some way determine the nature of gravity 
			itself. There may even be hints available to us regarding gravity. 
				
				 For instance, no final settlement has ever been made of the argument 
			over the opposed wave and corpuscular 
			theories of the propagation of light. An assumption that the ether, 
			a necessary adjunct to the wave theory, is identical with the 
			gravitational field, whatever that may be, would reconcile the 
			opposing theories and a quantum of light would then be merely a 
			pulsation or fluctuation in the gravitational field. Intense studies 
			of the movements of space-navigable UFOs might furnish vital clues 
			to such problems.[…] 
				
				 There is increasingly strong evidence that gravity is neither so 
			continuous, so immaterial nor so obscure as to be completely 
			unamenable to use, manipulation and control. […] The lifting of the 
			ancient megalithic structures, too, must surely have come through 
			levitation.[…] 
				
				  
				
				It is my belief that something of the sort was done in the 
			antediluvian past, through either research or through some 
			fortuitous discovery of physical forces and laws, which have not as 
			yet been revealed to scientists of this second wave of 
			civilization.172  
			 
			
			172 Jessup, 
			Morris K., 
			The Case for the UFO, (New York: Bantum Books 1955) pp. 
			38-42. 
			
			  
			
			Jessup next goes on to discuss the periodicity of 
			events of celestial and spatial origin. As he stated, it is not 
			particularly astonishing that such phenomena should be cyclic, for 
			nearly everything astronomical IS periodic. 
			
			 
			There are several important things in the comments of Jessup that 
			are pertinent to our discussion here. Not only is he drawing very 
			close to describing a paraphysical, hyperdimensional state of 
			existence which utilizes gravitational technology, he is also 
			pointing out a certain “periodicity” to the activities of same in 
			relationship to what might be considered points in time when 
			“dimensional doorways” open and close naturally. This is the 
			fundamental concept behind his idea of gravitational nodes in a 
			three-body system, the Earth, Moon and Sun.  
			
			  
			
			Jessup came to these 
			ideas by researching UFOs and other anomalous phenomena, and it is 
			very interesting to speculate as to how this might connect to the 
			ideas of Gurdjieff when he says we are “food for the Moon”. In the 
			latter case, Gurdjieff was repeating an ancient idea that may have 
			been related to the concept of hyperdimensional beings using 
			gravitational nodes as “portals” between dimensions. 
			
			 
			Another important point about Jessup’s comments is his connection 
			between scientific observations and clues in ancient myths to the 
			fact that the megalith builders had extraordinary abilities. In 
			short, what could it mean to be “enthroned” in terms of the Goddess? 
			How could this be a source of health, extended life, knowledge and 
			other benefits?  
			
			  
			
			Where on earth did such ideas come from?  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			The Dance of the Hours 
			
			 
			The Book of Hours of Jean de France, Duc de Berry, is considered to 
			be one of the most magnificent of late medieval manuscripts that 
			have survived into our time. A “Book of Hours” is a prayer book 
			based on the religious calendar of saints and festivals throughout 
			the year. The book commissioned by the Duke, undertaken by the 
			brothers Limbourg, consists of twelve folios; one for each month. 
			According to a lengthy analysis of these folios by Prof. Otto Neugebauer, this calendar encodes the traditions of ancient 
			astronomy and mathematics from deepest antiquity.  
			
			  
			
			At the conclusion 
			of a fascinating analysis, demonstrating the method of decoding the 
			Book of Hours, Otto Neugebauer writes: 
			
				
				The scheme ends where it began, with January 19, if we make the two 
			last lunations 29 days long. This final exception to the rule of 
			alternation was called sallus lunae, the “mump of the moon.” In 
			order to know which date is supposed to be a new moon, one need only 
			know which number the present year has in the 19-year cycle. This 
			number is called the “golden number” because, as a scholar of the 
			13th century expressed it, “this number excels all other lunar 
			rations as gold excels all other metals.”173
				 
			 
			
			173 Neugebauer, Otto, The Exact Sciences in Antiquity, 
			(New York: Dover 1969).  
			
			  
			
			The 19-year cycle is 
			called a “Metonic Cycle”. It refers to the observational fact that 
			19 years (6939.689 days) is almost exactly the same length as 235 
			lunar months (6939.602 days) and that a 19-year cycle consisting of 
			12 years that were 12-lunar-months-long and 7 years that were 
			13-lunar-months-long would keep the lunar months in step with the 
			seasons. In other words, the phases of the Moon start to reoccur, 
			within about 2 hours, on the same days of the same months of the 
			year.  
			
			  
			
			Meton tried to sell the scheme to the Athenians, who weren’t 
			interested, it seems, and nevertheless they named the idea the 
			“Metonic Cycle”. This 19-year cycle is closely related to the 18.6 
			year precession of the moon’s orbit about the earth which causes a 
			corresponding wobble (nutation) on the earth’s motion. This suggests 
			that the megalith builders KNEW about the planetary wobble! In fact, 
			the 18.6 year cycle seems to be a key concern of the megalith 
			builders: it is also an observational fact that every 18.6 years, 
			the moon reaches a major standstill point, which means that every 
			18.6 years, the rising or setting Moon reaches a northern extreme in 
			rising and setting azimuth at summer solstice, and a southern 
			extreme at winter solstice. 
			
			 
			In 1897 at Coligny in Burgundy, fragments of a bronze tablet were 
			discovered. 
			
			 
			Reassembled, this tablet is the longest known document in the Gallic 
			language. Dating to around the 1st century BC, it contains forty 
			different words written in Latin script, and it was a calendar. 
			After it was deciphered, it became clear that the Celts worked in 
			units of sixty-two lunar months, from one new moon to the next.  
			
			  
			
			One 
			of these months would contain thirty days, the next twenty-nine, 
			which gave half-months of fifteen days, or one fifteen-day period followed by a 
			fourteen-day period. The days were counted from moon-rise to 
			moon-rise. The year that emerged from all this was eleven days 
			shorter than the 365-day solar year. They corrected this problem, 
			however, by the simple expedient of alternating 12-month years with 
			13-month years,  -  3 of the former and 2 of the latter in a complete 
			cycle of 62 months. 
			
			 
			Obviously, this was a rather ingenious solution to the problem but 
			it begs the question: it’s obvious that they had the mathematical 
			skills to calculate the solar year rather accurately, so why didn’t 
			they use it as their calendar? Why were they not linking the passage 
			of time to the Sun, the agricultural cycles? Why were they so 
			obviously concerned with what the Moon was doing and having a 
			precise way of keeping track of it? Why did they count their days 
			from moon-rise to moonrise? We note that this is a custom still 
			reflected in the practices of the Jews and Moslems, who count a day 
			as beginning when the Sun sets as a consequence of their 
			interactions with the Indo-Europeans. 
			
			 
			Well, of course the experts tell us it was because they “worshipped” 
			the Moon. It was close and big and awesome to behold, so they 
			naturally just created a whole slew of ignorant beliefs about it, 
			and it became their “Goddess”, or God, as the case may be. As I have 
			already noted, by observing children, we may come to a better idea 
			of how it would be unlikely for the ancients (assuming they were 
			howling savages) to have come up with such ideas without some basis, 
			without some “story” having been told to them. Children accept the 
			natural world around them as it is until someone tells them a story. 
			And even then, you have to work hard to convince them that the story 
			is true because if you say that the moon is made of green cheese, 
			the child will think you have gone nuts. 
			
			 
			However, if we connect Jessup’s idea of a gravitational node that 
			lies somewhere between the earth and the moon, in a specific and 
			cyclic relationship, to the strange marking of time by the ancients 
			according to where the moon was, as well as the later “moon worship” 
			as the transmission of an archaic knowledge of some secret source of 
			power, then we come to the idea that the ancient technology was 
			something quite extraordinary. 
			
			 
			What seems to be evident is that the megalith builders were 
			concerned enough with the “three body system”  -  that relates to the 
			nutation of the Earth to the relative positions of the 
			earth-moon-sun  -  that they based their calendrical system on this 
			factor! This very well may suggest that they USED gravity.  
			
			  
			
			We want 
			to emphasize that curious comment of a thirteenth century scholar 
			quoted by Neugebauer who said, regarding the 19 year cycle:  
			
				
				“this 
			number excels all other lunar rations as gold excels all other 
			metals.”  
			 
			
			If we then connect that remark to the quests of the 
			alchemist to “transmute base metals into gold” via the 
			“philosopher’s stone”, and the alchemical adage, “the right person, 
			in the right place, at the 
			right time, doing the right thing, can accomplish the work”, we 
			begin to realize that we are moving in the correct direction.  
			
			  
			
			Most 
			particularly when we recall that curious story about Fulcanelli and 
			Jacques Bergier: 
			
				
				Certain geometrical arrangements of highly purified materials are 
			enough to release atomic forces without having recourse to either 
			electricity or vacuum techniques.174
				 
			 
			
			174 Pauwels, L, and Bergier, J., 
			
			The Morning of the 
			Magicians, (New York: Stein and Day. 1964) p. 77. 
			  
			
			This will become even more 
			significant further on. 
			  
			
			Are there any clues about stones themselves being part of an ancient 
			technology? At present, there are many people who claim that the 
			megaliths are arranged around the world on a grid, the structure of 
			which is, according to them, 36 degrees of longitude apart.  
			
			  
			
			The 
			assumption is that all of the megaliths belong to a single, 
			pre-flood civilization. The assumption being made from this 
			hypothesis is that the strange locations of these complexes implies 
			that the purpose of the megaliths was not to derive power from a 
			grid for local use, but rather, to do something to the earth grid by 
			coordinating local actions on a global basis. In other words, the 
			claim is that the megaliths appear to have been used to put energy 
			into a global grid rather than to extract energy from it. 
			
			 
			There are problems with this blanket assumption. First of all, while 
			we do not think that the present scientific dating is reliable, we 
			do think that some ball-park figures can be established if enough 
			care is taken in observing individual situations and taking all the 
			evidence into account. The undersea structures off Japan, Bimini, 
			and Malta, as well as Tiahuanaco in South America, all suggest a 
			civilization that belonged to a pre-cataclysmic environment.  
			
			  
			
			But 
			many other megalithic structures clearly belong to an “eruption” of 
			civilization in a postcataclysmic environment, including the 
			pyramids in Egypt, Central America, Stonehenge, and so on. What is 
			striking is the difference between the pyramidal groups and the 
			“circle making” groups, though many current researchers are trying 
			to connect them to the same basic philosophical context. I think 
			that may be a mistake. 
			
			 
			It has been proposed by the advocates of so-called 
			
			Sacred Geometry 
			that the placing of the megaliths was a function of “Grid 
			Engineering”, and that this is mankind’s oldest science. Such people 
			further claim that precise geometrical spherical versions of the 
			cube, such as the tetrahedron, octahedron, icosahedron, 
			dodecahedron, and other compound and semi-regular solids, such as 
			the cuboctahedron, are now recognized as evidence of Neolithic man’s 
			familiarity with the concepts of this putative sacred geometry. 
			 
			
			  
			
			These folks then go on to propose that this was a “mystical” sort of 
			practice that includes visualizing the earth’s energy grid in 
			certain ritualistic ways that will bring the individual in “tune” 
			with the superior intelligence of the Earth by producing 
			“resonance”.  
			
			 
			I have to wonder about this interpretation. If, as we suspect, we 
			have been under an “Hyperdimensional Raj”175 for these many 
			thousands of years, we might think that much of this material is 
			designed to do one of two things:  
			
				
					
					1) to inform us about the “control 
			system” 
					
					2) to perpetuate it 
				 
			 
			
			What would be more natural than for 
			the Matrix Control system to manipulate people to think that 
			“visualizing” these grids will bring them into “harmony” with the 
			earth and that this is a “good thing”?  
			
			  
			
			175 Thanks to C. Scott Littleton for 
			this handy term. 
			
			  
			
			It may be, in fact, that it 
			is designed to strengthen the prison and to make human beings into 
			the “batteries” that keep it in place! However, that does not mean 
			that discovering these things and knowing where these points are is 
			not a useful exercise. But, to take this very scientific knowledge, 
			ignore its possible correct applications, and fall into the trap of 
			doing what amounts to “rituals” of visualization so as to bring 
			oneself into “harmony” with the earth may be exactly what “they” 
			want us to do.  
			
			  
			
			The very fact that it is being so widely promulgated 
			in this way suggests to me that this is the case. 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			Possible Antagonistic Polarities in Ancient Civilizations 
			
			 
			When one tracks back through all of the ancient “matters” and 
			studies the different groups, trying to follow them as they moved 
			from place to place, studying the genetic morphology in order to 
			keep track of who is who, and comparing linguistics and myth and 
			archaeology, one comes to the startling realization that there were 
			significant polarities throughout space and time.  
			
			  
			
			I have tentatively 
			identified these polarities as the Circle People and the Triangle  -  
			or Pyramid  -  People. In a general sense, one can see the broad brush 
			of the triangle people in the Southern hemisphere, in the pyramids 
			and related cultures and artifacts.  
			
			  
			
			For the most part, their art is 
			primitive and stylistically rigid. In the northern hemisphere, one 
			sees the circle makers, the spirals, the rough megaliths, the art of Lascaux and Chauvet and the many other caves. One can note a clear 
			difference between the perceptions and the response to the 
			environment between the two trends and groups. Of course, there are 
			areas where there was obvious mixture of both cultures and styles, 
			and ideological constructions, but overall, there is a very distinct 
			difference. 
			
			 
			There are many books on “alternative science” being published in the 
			present time about the purported ancient civilizations. One 
			assumption that they all seem to hold in common is that everything 
			was all hunky dory, sweetness and light among all the people, and 
			the only thing that happened was that a nasty cataclysm came along 
			and brought it all to an end.  
			
			  
			
			They keep forgetting the issue of the 
			Vedas and Plato’s Timaeus where an ancient war was described, and it 
			was at that point in time, or immediately after, that the cosmic 
			catastrophe occurred. It would then be only reasonable to 
			suspect that the same differences between the warring parties would 
			be carried over into the post cataclysmic world.  
			
			  
			
			And it seems to be 
			a reasonable assumption that the “southern influence”, including 
			Egypt, was that of the “Atlanteans” of Plato, and that the “northern 
			influence”, including the builders of Stonehenge, were the 
			“Athenians” of Plato, the “Sons of Boreas”, or the North Wind, 
			keeping in mind that these “Athenians” were obviously not from 
			Athens as we know it today, though we are beginning to suspect that 
			we know who they were. 
			
			 
			We should also like to note that the so-called “civilizing 
			influence” of the South, of the creators of agricultural 
			civilizations, the instigation of writing and the wheel and so 
			forth, is always connected in some way to “scaly” critters like Fish Gods or 
			Serpents.  
			
			  
			
			It isn’t until fairly late that the Serpent makes 
			his appearance among the archaeological finds of Europe and central 
			Asia. Before the serpent appeared there, there were only Goddesses, 
			birds, and wavy lines representing water and cosmic energy. I think 
			that it is dangerous to confuse the issues.  
			
			  
			
			Again and again we see 
			currents of two completely different processes, two factions, two 
			ways of perceiving and interacting with the cosmos: one that wishes 
			to conceal and one that wishes to reveal, one that wishes to 
			dominate, one that wishes to share. 
			
			 
			We notice that many megalithic sites are located a certain points 
			that correspond
			with a certain geometry. But, if we look even closer, if we discard 
			the current so-called
			“Sacred Geometry” and just look at the sites themselves and let them 
			speak  -  all of them  -  instead of leaving this one or that one out because 
			it doesn’t quite fit, or only is “very close” to fitting, we may 
			discover another relationship that is suggested by the sites, rather 
			than working to fit the sites into an assumption.  
			
			  
			
			So many bizarre 
			ideas are being propagated at the present time, including the 
			preposterous one about the megaliths being set up to absorb the 
			energy of human sacrifices, and that the stones “drink blood...” that 
			it is quite discouraging to realize how easily people are misled by 
			nonsense. If such writers cannot figure out that the megaliths were 
			demonized by the church because they were revered by the nature 
			religions, which we theorize are carriers of ancient scientific 
			knowledge, and the nature religions themselves were also demonized, 
			then there isn’t much chance that they will figure anything else out 
			either.  
			
			  
			
			Such people also tend to be convinced that 
			the Holy Grail is 
			the cup from the Last Supper, too, and I won’t even comment on that. 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			Stone Technology and T.C. Lethbridge 
			
			 
			Getting back to our stones, and whether or not we can find even a 
			hint that they were involved in some kind of technology, we note 
			first of all that archaeologist T.C. Lethbridge once placed his hand 
			on one of the stones and received a strong tingling sensation like 
			an electric shock, and the huge, heavy stone felt as if it were 
			rocking wildly. Many other people have received sensations of shock 
			when placing their hands on certain stones, and photographs have 
			occasionally shown inexplicable light radiations emanating from 
			them.  
			
			  
			
			Upon examination, we find that many of the megaliths were 
			engraved with “cup and ring” marks  -  concentric rings and channels. 
			The first impression these designs give is that of a circuit board 
			of a computer. 
			
			 
			In Greek myth, the walls of Thebes were said to have been 
			constructed by the skill of a musician called Amphion and his lyre. 
			He played the lyre in such a way that stones were made to move. 
			Phoenician myth speaks of the God Ouranus moving stones as if they 
			had life of their own. This is one of numerous traditions from 
			around the world that sound in various forms was used to levitate 
			and move large stones. 
			
			 
			Stones may have another interesting property that deserves serious 
			research. In 1982, Tafter, the landlord at the Prince of Wales Inn 
			at Kenfig in Mid-Glamorgan, Wales, complained of the sound of organ 
			music and voices keeping him awake at night. To investigate, John Marke, an electrical engineer, and 
			Allan Jenkins, an industrial 
			chemist, connected electrodes to the wall of the pub after closing 
			time one night. They fed 20,000 volts across the electrodes and 
			locked tape recorders in the room for four hours.  
			
			  
			
			When the tapes 
			were analyzed, they had succeeded in taping voices speaking in old 
			Welsh, organ music, and a ticking clock. Interestingly, there was no 
			clock in the room at the time. It has been suggested that the stones 
			in the wall contained substances similar to those found in modern 
			recording tape. 
			
			 
			This last remark about “recordings” in stone brings us to another 
			interesting item. Tom C. Lethbridge, the above mentioned 
			archeologist (who became Director of Excavations for the Cambridge 
			Antiquarian Society and Director of the University Museum of 
			Archaeology and Ethnology), wrote a number of excellent books that 
			form a collection that has been called one of the most fascinating 
			records of paranormal research ever compiled. In recent years, 
			Lethbridge is finally beginning to be fully appreciated.  
			
			  
			
			Combining 
			the skills of a scientist with a completely open mind, he conducted 
			a series of experiments that convinced him of the existence of hyperdimensional realms
			that interact dynamically with our own. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Colin Wilson called him a man whose gifts were far ahead of his time 
			and credited him with one of the most remarkable and original minds 
			in parapsychology. We agree most heartily and highly recommend his 
			work to the reader. Over the past ten years or more, Lethbridge’s 
			work has served us as a platform for many fruitful speculations and 
			experiments about hyperdimensional realities. 
			
			 
			Tom Lethbridge, the Cambridge don, took no interest in psychical 
			research until after he had retired. But dowsing fascinated him.  
			
			  
			
			In 
			the early 1930’s, he and another archaeologist were looking for 
			Viking graves on the Isle of Lundy in the Bristol Channel. After 
			finding what they came for, they were just killing time while 
			waiting for a ferry and decided to try some experiments with 
			dowsing, which had been an interest of Lethbridge for some time. 
			Lundy Island is crisscrossed with seams of volcanic rock that 
			extrude through the slate, and Lethbridge wanted to see if dowsing 
			would locate them. So, he had his friend blindfold him and lead him 
			about with a forked hazel stick. Every time he passed over a 
			volcanic seam, the hazel fork twisted violently in his hands. The 
			friend was carrying a very sensitive magnetometer and was able to 
			immediately verify that Lethbridge had accurately located the 
			volcanic seams of rock. 
			
			 
			Lethbridge realized that, like running water, volcanic rock has a 
			faint magnetic field. He had written about dowsing earlier,  
			
				
				“Most 
			people can dowse, if they know how to do it. If they cannot do it, 
			there is probably some fault in the electrical system of their 
			bodies”. 
			 
			
			This remark makes us wonder if there are not people who have 
			extremely powerful and well-developed electrical systems in their 
			bodies, and if such conditions might not be a genetic inheritance? 
			This question will come up again further on, so keep it in mind. 
			
			 
			Lethbridge’s success with finding volcanic rock started him off on 
			his
			investigations into other realms. Hidden objects could not stay 
			hidden when
			Lethbridge was wandering around with his rods, twigs or pendulum. 
			There didn’t
			seem to be any limits to what could be detected this way. He had 
			proved to his
			complete satisfaction not only that dowsing worked, but that it was 
			“mind stuff”
			- the rod or pendulum was connected to the mind of the person 
			holding it in some way. 
			
			 
			Tom Lethbridge’s results proved to be not only accurate but also 
			repeatable, and he found the responses appeared to be governed by 
			vibrations of various wavelengths. The wavelength of water, for 
			instance, was different to that of metal. His principal instrument 
			became the pendulum, and he found a lot depended on the length of 
			the pendulum’s cord.  
			
			  
			
			He was able to test not only for minerals but 
			abstract things and qualities like anger, death, deceit, sleep, 
			colors, male, and female. In a lengthy series of trial and error 
			experiments, he created a table of very precise measurements 
			showing, for example, that a 22-inch length would reveal the 
			existence of silver or lead, while iron demanded a 32-inch stretch, 
			but sulphur a mere 7 inches.  
			
			  
			
			Stranger still, though, the pendulum 
			would react to different emotions and attributes, with a different 
			length for feminine (29”) and masculine (24”) objects, including 
			human or animal remains. The details of his experiments are utterly 
			fascinating. This open-minded and extremely literate man was aware 
			that many people would regard his methods and findings with 
			suspicion.  
			
			  
			
			He once wrote: 
			
				
				“It is impossible for it to be imaginary. If you can use a pendulum 
			to work out within an inch or two exactly where something lies 
			hidden beneath undisturbed turf, and do this in front of witnesses, 
			and then go to the spot which the pendulum has indicated and take 
			off the turf, dig up the soil beneath and find the object. If you 
			can do this same operation again and again and almost always 
			succeed, this cannot be imagination, delusion, or any of those 
			things. It is scientific experiment, however crude it may be.” 
			 
			
			Perhaps the reason why some still cannot accept dowsing is because 
			it is so incredibly simple. At no cost at all you can produce an 
			instrument no piece of expensive machinery can equal. But again, 
			Lethbridge points out that everything depends on the operator. 
			
			 
			Lethbridge found himself confronted with a very strange world  -  “far 
			stranger I feel than anything produced by physics, botany or 
			biology” - and he wrote of millions of cones of force surrounding 
			each of us in our homes and backyards which can be contacted 
			instantly by something in our own “energy field”. It was much more 
			difficult to comprehend than molecules, atoms and electrons, he 
			said, because we had been brought up to take these for granted. 
			
			 
			As we have already noted, if the infrastructure of our civilization 
			were to be destroyed, then if a person a hundred years later tried 
			to explain the theory of radio and television, people would find it 
			impossible to comprehend. It would sound like magic. 
			
			 
			Where does the power to work a pendulum come from? Lethbridge 
			thought that it might be something invisible and intangible, a part 
			of us, which knows far more than we do. Is it mind or soul? Some 
			sort of electromagnetic or psyche field? Something linked to a 
			higher dimension? He agonized over this and admitted he wasn’t wise 
			enough to come to any definite conclusion, apart from the thought 
			that ancient man knew far more about it than we do today. 
			
			 
			Although, Lethbridge did a huge amount of experimental work in the 
			field of dowsing, and his results deserve attention from any serious 
			student of the deeper realities of our world, what we are interested 
			in here is his work in another, though related, direction. 
			
			 
			In 1957, Lethbridge left Cambridge in disgust at the narrow-minded 
			attitudes of the scholars there. He moved into Hole House, an old 
			Tudor mansion on the south coast of Devon. Next door to him lived a 
			little old white-haired lady who assured Lethbridge that she could 
			put spells on people who annoyed her and that she was able to travel 
			out of her body at night and wander around the district. She 
			explained that if she wanted to discourage unwanted visitors, she 
			had only to visualize a five-pointed star in the path of the 
			individual and they would stay away. Lethbridge, of course, was 
			skeptical. 
			
			 
			But, being an experimenter, Lethbridge was trying the visualization 
			one evening while lying in bed. That night, his wife awakened with 
			the feeling that somebody else was in the room. She could see a 
			faint glow of light at the foot of the bed, which slowly faded. The 
			next day the old lady came to see them and told them that she had 
			come to “visit” them the previous night and had found the bed 
			surrounded by triangles of fire. 
			
			 
			Leaving aside whether or not we can prove this story to be anything 
			more than a subjective experience, there are two important points we 
			would like to make. The first one is that somehow, this practice of 
			“visualizing pentagrams” seems to have a causal relationship to the 
			appearance of the old woman in Lethbridge’s bedroom. It was almost 
			as though the practice “attracted” the visitor, possibly even 
			inspiring the wish or compulsion to visit. The second is that the 
			visualized pentagrams appeared as triangles of fire.  
			
			  
			
			Theories of how hyperdimensional objects might appear in fourth dimensional 
			space-time, or how four dimensional objects might appear in three 
			dimensional space time, in mathematical terms, lends a modicum of 
			credibility to this story. If the old woman had seen fiery 
			pentagrams, we would not take such notice of the event.  
			
			  
			
			That a 
			pentagon in our world might appear as a triangle in another realm 
			suggests something very mysterious here. I am also intrigued by the 
			possible relationship to the differences of these hyperdimensional 
			solids and the difference between the perspectives of the “triangle 
			people” and the “circle people”. This is also a very important point 
			related to the dangers of visualizing geometric shapes when we 
			consider the subsequent events that Lethbridge recounted. 
			
			 
			Several years later, the old lady told Lethbridge that she was going 
			to put a spell on the cattle of a farmer with whom she was 
			quarreling. At this point, Lethbridge took her seriously and warned 
			her about the dangers of practicing magic. She ignored him, and one 
			day not long after declaring her intentions, she was found dead in 
			her bed under mysterious circumstances. As it happened, the cattle 
			of two other nearby farmers did get hoof and mouth disease, but the 
			cattle of the farmer with whom 
			the old lady was quarreling were unaffected. Lethbridge was 
			convinced that the “spell” had rebounded on the old lady in some 
			way. But, it was this event that led to an important insight for us 
			here, which is why we have recounted the story. 
			
			 
			Sometime after the old woman’s death, Lethbridge was passing her 
			cottage and suddenly experienced a “nasty feeling”, a “suffocating 
			sense of depression”. His curiosity aroused, Lethbridge walked 
			around the cottage and discovered a most interesting thing: he could 
			step into and out of the “depression” just as if it were some kind 
			of invisibly defined “locus”. 
			
			 
			This reminded Lethbridge of a similar experience he had had when 
			walking with his mother as a teenager. It was in the Great Wood near 
			Wokingham, on a nice morning, when suddenly the two of them 
			experienced a, 
			
				
				“horrible feeling of gloom and depression, which crept 
			upon us like a blanket of fog over the surface of the sea”. 
				 
			 
			
			They 
			left in a hurry and only later discovered that the corpse of a 
			suicide had been discovered lying just a few yards from where they 
			had been standing. Some years later, Lethbridge and his wife went to 
			the seashore to collect seaweed for their garden. As he walked on 
			the beach, he again experienced the sense of depression, gloom and 
			fear descending on him. Resisting this influence, Lethbridge and his 
			wife began to fill their sacks with seaweed.  
			
			  
			
			After a very short 
			period of this activity, Lethbridge’s wife, Mina, came running up to 
			him demanding that they leave saying,  
			
				
				“I can’t stand this place a 
			minute longer. There’s something frightful here”. 
			 
			
			In a discussion about the phenomenon with Mina’s brother the 
			following day, the brother mentioned that he had experienced 
			something very similar in a field near Avebury, in Wiltshire.  
			
			  
			
			When 
			he said the word “field”, it clicked in Lethbridge’s mind and he 
			remembered that field telephones often short circuit in warm, muggy 
			weather. 
			
				
					
					 “What was the weather like?”, he asked. “Warm and damp”, replied the brother. 
				 
			 
			
			Right there, the idea began to shape itself in Lethbridge’s mind. 
			Water.  
			
			  
			
			On the day he had been in the Great Wood, it had been warm 
			and damp. When they had been at the beach gathering seaweed, it had 
			likewise been warm and damp. Experiment was obviously in order! 
			
			 
			The next weekend, Lethbridge and his wife again visited the bay. 
			Again, as they stepped onto the beach, the same bank of depression 
			and gloom enveloped them. Mina led him to the spot where she had 
			experienced such an overwhelming sensation that she had insisted on 
			leaving the place. At that spot, the sensation was so powerful that 
			they actually felt dizzy. Lethbridge described it as being similar 
			to having a high fever and full of drugs. As it happened, on either 
			side of this spot were two streams of water. 
			
			 
			Mina went off to the cliff to look at the scenery and suddenly 
			walked into the “depression” again. She actually had the sensation 
			that something or someone was urging her to jump off the cliff! When 
			she had brought it to the attention of Lethbridge, he agreed that 
			this spot was as “sinister” as the spot on the beach between the 
			streams. 
			
			 
			As it turned out, nine years later, a man did commit suicide from 
			that exact spot. Lethbridge wondered if there was some sort of 
			“timeless” sensation that had been “imprinted” on the area via some 
			sort of “recording” principle. It seemed that, whether from the past or the future, feelings 
			of despair were somehow recorded on the surroundings, in the very 
			atmosphere, it seemed.  
			
			  
			
			The only question was, how? Lethbridge 
			believed that the key was water. 
			
			 
			A hint of what may be happening here is provided by the work of Y. 
			Rocard of the Sorbonne, who had discovered that underground water 
			produces changes in the earth’s magnetic field, and this was 
			proposed as the solution as to why dowsing works. The water does 
			this because it has a field of its own which interacts with the 
			earth’s field.  
			
			  
			
			And most significantly to us here is that magnetic 
			fields are the means by which sound is recorded on tape covered with 
			iron oxide. This suggested to Lethbridge that the magnetic field 
			produced by running water could record strong emotions that, as 
			Lethbridge also noted, produce electrical activity in the human 
			physiology. Such fields could be “played back” continuously, and 
			amplified in damp and muggy weather. 
			
			 
			This would explain why these “areas of depression” seem to form 
			invisible walls. If you bring a magnet closer and closer to an iron 
			object, you notice that at a certain point, the object is “seized” 
			by the magnet as it enters the force field. Lethbridge’s experiments 
			took a new turn at this point, and led to evidence that many things 
			that are perceived as “hauntings” or “ghosts” are really just 
			“recordings”.  
			
			  
			
			At some point he thought about the fact that ghosts 
			are often reported to reappear on certain “anniversaries” which 
			suggests that there are other cyclical currents that turn such 
			recordings on or off or simply amplify them. To answer the question 
			that is growing in the reader’s mind, yes, it seems that some hauntings are the result of happy emotions, and strong happiness can 
			also be recorded in the same way. It also seems that the type of 
			material substance that the human “field” interacts with has an 
			important role. For example, in the 1840s, a certain Bishop Polk 
			told a Joseph Rhodes Buchanan that he could detect brass in the 
			dark. He said that when he touched it, a distinctly unpleasant taste 
			was produced in his mouth.  
			
			  
			
			Buchanan tested him and discovered that 
			it was true, even if the metal was carefully and thickly wrapped in 
			paper. Buchanan experimented with his students and found that some 
			of them had a similar ability. In fact, it seemed that there were 
			quite a number of substances that could be detected this way, and 
			the only explanation that seemed reasonable was that the nerves of 
			the human being produce some sort of field  -  he called it the nerve 
			aura  -  which interacts with a similar “field” of the object. 
			Buchanan and others called the ability to “read” these fields 
			“psychometry”, and it is popularly practiced today.  
			
			  
			
			What many people 
			do not realize is that the principle of psychometry, that many take 
			for granted  -  they can “feel the vibrations”  -  led Tom Lethbridge to 
			some startling revelations. 
			
			 
			As noted, Tom Lethbridge had concluded after a lot of experiments 
			that a dowsing pendulum could somehow respond to different 
			substances, and that lengthening or shortening the string was like 
			tuning the pendulum to a particular wavelength. Lethbridge spent 
			days testing all kinds of different substances. He discovered that 
			the wavelength for silver is the same as lead: 22 inches. Truffles 
			and beech wood both respond at 17 inches. This meant that there must 
			be something further about such “paired” items to distinguish them. 
			After some testing, Lethbridge discovered that it was not just the 
			length of the string, but the number and direction of revolutions. 
			 
			
			  
			
			For lead, the pendulum would gyrate 16 times and for silver it would gyrate 22 times. It was 
			beginning to look like nature had a truly marvelous and foolproof 
			code for identifying anything. It is also beginning to appear to us 
			that the ancients knew this and that they may have attempted to 
			transmit this knowledge to us via myth and legend and the “Green 
			Language”. (That magical mumbo jumbo might not be the solution to 
			the mysteries is also becoming more and more apparent, but, let us 
			continue into even more remarkable speculations of Tom Lethbridge.) 
			
			 
			Through a variety of experiments, Lethbridge established the 
			“frequency” for both death and violent anger: 40 inches. This also 
			proved to be the frequency for cold and black. Indeed, colors have 
			frequency. Grey is 22 inches -   not a surprise since it is the color 
			of both lead and silver. Yellow is 29 and green is 30. After months 
			of experiments, Lethbridge had constructed his table of frequencies, 
			and he had discovered that 40 inches was some kind of limit.  
			
			  
			
			Every 
			single substance that he tested fell between zero and 40 inches. It 
			was at this point that he discovered something curious: Sulphur 
			reacts to a 7 inch pendulum; if he extended the pendulum to 47 
			inches, it would still react to sulphur, but not directly over it. 
			It would only react a little to one side. He then discovered that 
			this was true of everything else he tried beyond the number 40  -  it 
			would react, but only to one side. He noticed another odd thing: 
			beyond 40 inches, there was no rate for the concept of time. The 
			pendulum simply would not respond.  
			
			  
			
			Lethbridge realized that he was 
			measuring a different dimension.  
			
			  
			
			However, when he lengthened the 
			pendulum to 80 inches, there was a response to the idea of time. Lethbridge pondered this and finally theorized that in the realm 
			beyond 40, the pendulum is in time itself, and that is why there is 
			no reaction to the idea. But, beyond that, there are other “realms” 
			where the idea of time exists in another world “beyond death”. 
			Lethbridge discovered that if he lengthened the string again beyond 
			80 inches, he got the same result, as if there were still another 
			dimension. Lethbridge realized that he had discovered worlds in 
			other dimensions, outside the limits of space and time, and 
			theorized that we cannot see it because our physical bodies are 
			limited detectors. 
			
			 
			Tom Lethbridge continued with his experiments and determined that 
			the world of the “next” level beyond our own is one in which the 
			energy vibrations are four times as fast as those of our world. The 
			effect of encountering this reality is like a fast train passing a 
			slow one. Even though they are both moving forward, the slow train 
			seems to be moving backward. This hyperdimensional world is all 
			around us, yet we are unable to see it because it is beyond the 
			range of our senses. All the objects of our world are very likely 
			just our limited perceptions of what is happening in this total 
			reality. 
			
			 
			His experiments with megaliths indicated that they were placed to 
			mark places where the earth forces were most powerful, and to 
			harness energy in some way now forgotten. 
			
			 
			Unfortunately, Lethbridge died of a heart attack before he could 
			complete his researches. 
			
			 
			At this point we would like to note that Tom Lethbridge was not a 
			spiritualist. He believed that magic, spiritualism, occultism and 
			other forms of mumbo jumbo are merely crude attempts to understand 
			the vast realm of hidden energies in which we live. We would like to 
			add that expositions along the lines of most esoterica generally serve only to obscure, not to 
			reveal; to disinform, rather than to produce real knowledge.   
			
			  
			
			Tom Lethbridge used logic and experiment and observation to come to the 
			conclusion that there are other realms of reality beyond our world 
			and that there are forms of energy that we do not even begin to 
			understand. 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Stones and “Sacred Geometry”
			176  
			
			  
			
			Coming back now to our 
			stones, and the questions about their placement, we realize that 
			this matter is not as simple as the many “Sacred Geometry” 
			specialists would have us believe. We need to do more investigating 
			before we come to any solid conclusions about earth grids and what 
			they may or may not do.  
			
			  
			
			176 Lethbridge, T.C., The 
			Power of the Pendulum (Viking, Penguin, 1991); also see Wilson, 
			Colin, Mysteries (Putnam Publishing Group, 1980). 
			
			  
			
			The temple at 
			
			Baalbek, Lebanon, is probably 
			one of the most astonishing structures on earth due to the sheer 
			size of the stones used in its construction. In a quarry about a 
			mile away from the actual temple is an abandoned stone that was 
			never used. It is the biggest stone block ever cut by man and its 
			measurements are 68 ft by 14 feet wide and 14 feet tall. In other 
			words, it is a single building block that is as large as two 
			complete modest homes put together. The block is estimated to weigh 
			1200 tons.  
			
			  
			
			From this single block, if cut into manageable pieces, 
			stonemasons could build 15 houses, each 20 by 40 feet, with walls a 
			foot thick. The Egyptian obelisks were large; each being a single 
			block, but the largest one standing today is less than half the size 
			of this stone. The marble for the columns of Baalbek was obtained 
			from a quarry far up the Nile, and then overland for 400 miles. The 
			column drums themselves were cut in sections 20 feet long. The 
			platform upon which Baalbek is built is composed of granite blocks 
			and measures 900 feet by 600 feet.  
			
			  
			
			In this platform are positioned 
			three stones that are each 63 feet long, 13 feet high, and 10 feet 
			thick. The doorway of the “smaller” temple of Bacchus at Baalbek is 
			fifty feet high and is said to be the most marvelous doorway in all 
			of ancient architecture. Even as a ruin, having been damaged by wars 
			and earthquakes, Baalbek is still one of the most awesome sights in 
			the world.  
			
			  
			
			Curiously, most of those who write about ancient 
			monuments seldom mention Baalbek except in passing.  
			
			  
			
			One has to 
			wonder if it is because they simply prefer to not have to think 
			about the cutting and moving of those stones? 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			The Coral Castle and Spinning Airplane Seats 
			
			 
			In October of 1994, I asked the Cassiopaeans  -  myself in the future  -  how the stones of Baalbek were cut and moved. They replied that it 
			was done by “sound wave focusing”. Well, sure!  
			
			  
			
			But then they added 
			that I was going to discover something about this myself, and they 
			cryptically mentioned the “Coral Castle”.  
			
			  
			
			Edward Leedskalnin was a 100-pound, unschooled wizard who 
			single-handedly built an edifice known as the Coral Castle down in 
			South Florida.  
			
			  
			
			Some of the stones Edward used in the construction of 
			the Coral Castle weigh 28 tons. That is not in the same ballpark as 
			the stones of Baalbek, but for the work of a single, little guy, it 
			suggests to us that he certainly discovered something! 
			
			 
			Leedskalnin also produced several pamphlets for sale during the 
			mid-1940’s dealing with magnetic currents. These pamphlets describe 
			various experiments he undertook with home made magnets that he 
			created using such things as welding rods, steel fishing line, and 
			automobile batteries. It is thought that he was explicating the 
			ideas that would lead the insightful reader to the same discovery he 
			had made himself. So far, no one has figured it out except to 
			propose that it had something to do with the so-called “earth grid”, 
			which, as we will see, is more nonsense. 
			
			 
			As it happens, even though I lived my entire life in Florida, I had 
			never been to see this purported marvel, and the only things I knew 
			about it were what I had learned by watching a television program 
			about it on Unsolved Mysteries, I believe. 
			
			 
			The February following the Cassiopaean’s remark about the Coral 
			Castle, I was invited to give a talk to a study group in Orlando. 
			 
			
			  
			
			After my little talk, a funny old man came up to me with a big grin 
			on his face, grabbed my hand and shook it vigorously and said to me 
			with a faint accent,  
			
				
				“Ya know, I’ve been studying this UFO business 
			for over 40 years - I talked with Hynek and Major Keyhoe and all 
			that - and you are the first person I have ever heard who has gotten 
			up in public and described it as it really is! I have some material 
			you might be interested in. You should come and see me some time”! 
			 
			
			Well, I thought he was just an old guy with a lot of time on his 
			hands that needed company and might be using this as an excuse to 
			get it. I thanked him, chatted a bit, and when he went off to get a 
			snack, I “mingled” in the direction of the host of the event who was 
			chatting with several other people, intending to make my adieus.  
			
			  
			
			He 
			was apparently describing the Florida tourist attractions to a group 
			of out-of-towners when he said,  
			
				
				“And you might want to go down and 
			have a look at this Coral Castle, too”! 
				
				“What is that?”, one of them asked. 
				 
			 
			
			The host proceeded to recap the 
			Unsolved Mysteries presentation.  
			
				
				Then he said: “You can ask Henry 
			over there”, pointing at my little old man who knew Hynek, “he was a 
			close friend of the guy who built the Coral Castle”. 
			 
			
			Well, needless to say, after hearing this, I remembered 
			the Cassiopaeans had said that I would “discover” something about this 
			“sound-wave focusing”.  
			
			  
			
			I decided that I wouldn’t leave just yet, and 
			went back to chat with the old man and said,  
			
				
				“I hear you knew the 
			guy who built the Coral Castle?” “Ayup! Sure did! Knew him for years! I was stationed over there in 
			Homestead area after the war and got to know him pretty well.” 
				
				 I asked, “Did he ever tell you how he did it?” 
				
				 “Nope. He never would tell anybody. He would always say that he knew 
			the secret of how the pyramids were built, but nobody ever saw him 
			do it. I have some ideas about it, though, and I wrote a little book 
			about him and my experiences and observations. You know, it’s a 
			shame that the television program didn’t give the real story! All that nonsense about ‘Sweet 
			Sixteen’ and a ‘broken heart’ and so on! What a lot of crap! Sure! 
			If you come to visit, I can show you what I do know! Do ‘ya know 
			something? I am the only person ole Edward ever invited inside his 
			private living quarters! Ayup! He was a real loner!” 
			 
			
			I was already making plans for a visit! 
			
			 
			I made the trip back over to the Orlando area within a couple of 
			weeks. I was truly amazed at what I found. Henry hadn’t been 
			exaggerating when he said he had been interested in studying UFOs 
			for forty years. His home was a veritable museum of UFOs! There were 
			paintings, enlarged photographs on the walls, knick-knacks and 
			memorabilia on the tables; and books! He had a HUGE collection of 
			books in bookcases and papers in boxes all over his house.  
			
			  
			
			Out of 
			one of these boxes he pulled a loose-leaf notebook containing a 
			typewritten manuscript. It had black and white photographs stuck in 
			the appropriate places with corner tabs, and he said it was the only 
			copy. I was appalled at that and offered to transcribe it onto the 
			computer and give him a copy on diskette. He said he would like that 
			very much, but he was not yet ready to let the only existing copy 
			leave his possession. I certainly understood.  
			
			  
			
			The manuscript was 
			about his long friendship with Edward Leedskalnin and all their 
			conversations. Henry wasn’t one to pry, and that may be why he was 
			accepted as a friend. The photographs were of Henry and Edward - Henry 
			in his military uniform - and many others of his children playing 
			among the great blocks of the Coral Castle. 
			
			 
			I regret that I did not read the book carefully - because Henry died 
			in 1996 - but there was no time with all the other fascinating things 
			to do and see. Henry took me on a tour of his memorabilia, his 
			photographs, and his books. It was just too much to absorb at once! 
			Finally, we sat down and I was able to ask about that most 
			interesting of clues that Henry had let drop - that he had been inside 
			the living quarters of Edward Leedskalnin while Edward was still 
			living. I wanted to know what he had observed. 
			
			 
			Henry described how Edward had done a lot of experiments and knew 
			all kinds of secrets, but that he was very paranoid. That is why he 
			told the crazy story about “Sweet Sixteen” and the phony broken 
			heart. It was to put people off the trail, or so he thought. Edward 
			had the idea that if he let it be known exactly what he knew, he 
			would be picked up by some government officials and never seen 
			again.  
			
			  
			
			Well, maybe he wasn’t crazy! 
			
			 
			Henry told me that, after much, or all, of the Coral Castle had been 
			built, Edward had moved it from one location to another. Apparently 
			there was some question of zoning and Edward was told he had to tear 
			it down or move it. He moved it. 
			
			 
			Certain “researchers” have claimed that it was moved because of some 
			theory of earth grids relating to Sacred Geometry, but that does not 
			seem to be true based on what Henry told me. It was simply a 
			question of zoning and county regulations. And, since it was built 
			in a different original location, that pretty much discounts the 
			idea that the location was important to the act of building. It 
			simply wasn’t, and the evidence does not support the idea. 
			
			 
			The mode of the moving of this pile of rocks was what was so 
			interesting to me. Apparently, Edward hired a truck and driver; only 
			he would have the driver park the truck overnight and send him home. The next morning, the truck 
			would be loaded with the huge blocks of stone and would be driven to 
			the new site.  
			
			  
			
			There was a block and tackle on tall poles prominently 
			displayed and, apparently, Edward confided to Henry that this was 
			his ruse to give the impression that this was what he was using to 
			unload the blocks. He would send the driver off on an errand, 
			leaving the truck there with the blocks on it, and when the driver 
			would return, the truck would be unloaded. This was repeated over 
			and over again until all the stones were moved to the new site. 
			There are reports that say he placed his hands on the stones and 
			“sang” to them. 
			
			 
			Another peculiar thing was that Henry told me he had visited the 
			quarry where the stones were cut and there were no tailings! 
			Tailings are the stone equivalent of sawdust. When you saw wood, you 
			have sawdust. When you cut stone or metal, you have tailings.177 So, 
			however Leedskalnin cut these stones, it was not a usual method! 
			
			  
			
			177 Remember Schoch’s findings 
			about the stones of the underwater monuments. They didn’t appear to 
			have been cut. 
			
			 
			The final and most interesting part of Henry’s story was the 
			description of the living quarters of Edward Leedskalnin.  
			
			  
			
			According 
			to Henry, there were three pieces of ordinary furniture in the room: 
			a cot type bed, a hand-made wooden table with a framed screen that 
			fit over the top to keep insects off the food which was stored there 
			since Edward had no refrigerator, and a hand-made wooden chair. What 
			was not ordinary was an airplane seat suspended by chain from the 
			ceiling - complete with seatbelt. 
			
			 
			Now, for an extremely ascetic man, one who slept on a simple cot, 
			and ate the simplest of diets, and who had absolutely no use for any 
			kind of luxuries or comforts at all, what was he doing with an 
			airplane seat suspended from the ceiling? 
			
			 
			I thought about this for a while. I thought about swinging in such a 
			seat. But if swinging was all that wanted, why not just build a 
			wooden swing that would be in keeping with the other hand-made 
			wooden items in the room. 
			
			 
			But Edward did not do that. He had an airplane seat with a seatbelt. 
			Why?  
			
			  
			
			Well, let’s consider some of the things he has written in his 
			little pamphlets. Edward writes about sphere or ball magnets, which 
			can change the poles to any location on the sphere. He discusses 
			lengths of magnetization (North vs. South) in a rod as varying by 
			Earth’s latitude. North and South are separate magnetic currents, 
			running “against the other” in whirling, right-hand screw like 
			fashion, i.e. dextrorotatory helices.  
			
			  
			
			He then says: 
			
				
				Magnets they are the cosmic force, they hold together this earth and 
			everything on it. […] I have a generator that generates currents on 
			a small scale from the air without using any magnets around it. […] 
			The natural path to the North Pole magnets in the Northern 
			Hemisphere is to go down, and the South Pole magnets to go up. When 
			the magnets are running out of the middle of the earth, as soon as 
			they meet an object they attract it, on account of the fact that in 
			any object there has both kinds of magnets in it.178
				 
			 
			
			Now, one just 
			has to wonder about his “generator” that generates currents “from 
			the air”, and whether or not it has anything to do with spinning in 
			a right-hand, screw-like fashion? And then one gets the little light 
			bulb lighting up over one’s head that suggests that Edward Leedskalnin was using his airplane seat with the seatbelt to sit in 
			and spin, and that he, himself, was the “generator”. One also thinks 
			immediately about the length of the chain in reference to 
			Lethbridge’s experiments. 
			
			 
			Edward also mentioned another curious thing:  
			
				
				“I have several lily 
			pools where I keep water. I have watched the lily pools for sixteen 
			years.”  
			 
			
			This quote is interesting because of the connection in 
			legend between the presence of water and “moving stones”, as well as Lethbridge’s connection of water to certain fields. Some ancient 
			megaliths were said to go down to the nearest stream for a drink at 
			certain astronomically propitious times of the year. And 
			“astronomically propitious” may be another clue because, Edward also 
			suggests that the experimenter “face the east”.  
			
			  
			
			But, we still wonder 
			about the mode of manifestation of this strange power that we seem 
			to be approaching from several different directions.  
			
			  
			
			We may find a 
			clue in the following: 
			
				
				When a time-varying magnetic field is applied to a ferromagnetic, a 
			rearrangement of local lattice strain fields due to the motion of 
			non-magnetic domain walls occurs and emits elastic energy. The 
			interaction between domain walls and lattice defects creates a 
			discontinuity in the domain wall motion causing a burst of energy 
			called Magneto-Acoustic Emission (MAE).  
				  
				
				The envelope of the 
			time-averaged MAE bursts has a unique shape, which has been shown to 
			be dependent upon the frequency and magnitude of the applied field 
			and factors affecting lattice defects such as embrittlement. 
			Although domain wall movement is a random process it does exhibit 
			features of regularity which have been identified by studying 
			phenomena such as 1/f flicker noise and self-organized criticality 
			(the “domino effect“). Nevertheless, certain fundamental elements of 
			the MAE characteristics remain unexplained.179
				 
			 
			
			178 Leedskalnin, Edward, Magnetic Current 
			(Pomeroy, WA: Health Research 1998) p. 4. Other citations are from 
			photocopies of a monograph published by Leedskalnin.  
			
			179 J. P. 
			Fulton, B. Wincheski and M. Namkung, A Probabilistic Model for 
			Simulating Magneto-Acoustic Emission Responses in Ferromagnets M. 
			Namkung, B. Wincheski, J. P. Fulton and R. G. 
			
			  
			
			What the above is 
			saying to us is that the application of a magnetic field causes 
			motion of non-magnetic domain walls in the material and emits 
			elastic energy. In other words, it makes a sound in response to the 
			magnetic field.  
			
			  
			
			Was Edward Todhunter,
			Leedskalnin spinning a precise number of times, at a precise 
			frequency length, in order to produce an energy within him that 
			connected him to another realm, which resulted in a “Magneto 
			Acoustic Emission”? That is, did he produce a sound of a very 
			special sort that enabled him to move massive blocks of stone, not 
			because he was strengthened by what he did, but because this sound, 
			emitted from a timeless dimension that he had tapped, directed at 
			the stones, had an effect on gravity?  
			
			  
			
			That’s all fine and good for a 
			single person to be able to utilize such a handy technique to 
			manhandle some big chunks of rock like they were marshmallows. But 
			now we want to inquire into how an entire civilization would utilize 
			such a technology? What can it mean to suggest that in those areas 
			where the megaliths march along the landscape, and where the 
			megalithic temples are situated, that the peoples did not produce a 
			civilization as we know it because they didn’t need to?  
			
			  
			
			How does it 
			all connect to Morris Jessup’s remark that, 
			
				
				“It may be that this 
			tremendous power was limited in its application to articles of stone 
			texture only…[This would] account for the strange fact that almost 
			all relics of the profound past are non-metallic”? 
			 
			
			  
			
			 
			Egyptian Stone Vases 
			
			 
			Both Graham Hancock and Colin Wilson devote considerable time to 
			describing the marvels of Egypt and the construction of the pyramid 
			in terms of the possible techniques of cutting the stones with such 
			amazing accuracy. They describe in some detail the event that led to 
			the fraudulent dating of the pyramid, which date was taken up by 
			mainstream archaeologists who cannot now repudiate it because they 
			have too many other theories and dates hinged on this original 
			error. What is interesting to us here about Egypt is a discovery 
			made by Flinders Petrie in the village of Naqada in 1893.  
			
			  
			
			Naqada is 
			300 miles south of Cairo, and pottery and stone vases were 
			discovered there that were produced by some technique that has 
			created considerable controversy. 
			
			 
			It seems that the pottery of Naqada had none of the striations that 
			would indicate that it had been thrown on a wheel. But, without a 
			pottery wheel, it is almost impossible to get pots to be “perfectly 
			round”. But this pottery was so perfectly rounded that it was absurd 
			to think that it had been made by hand without a wheel!  
			
			  
			
			Petrie, of 
			course, dated the pottery to the 11th dynasty, around 2000 BC, based 
			on his observations of workmanship, rather than on any other 
			criteria. The pottery was, however, so “un-Egyptian” that he called 
			the creators “the New Race”. Petrie faced a certain difficulty when 
			he later found some of these same types of stone vases in tombs of 
			the First Dynasty dating from, according to Egyptologists, around 
			3000 BC. At this point, he dropped the Naqada vase from his 
			chronology, preferring to ignore what he could not explain. 
			
			
			 
			Did the Naqadans produce these artifacts? 
			
			 
			The Naqada peoples were descended from Paleolithic farmers who began 
			raising crops in North Africa around 5000 BC. They buried their dead 
			facing West, and seemed to be your standard primitive culture. The 
			only problem was: the vases. The most astonishing of them were, 
			 
			
				
				“tall vases with long, thin, elegant necks and finely flared 
			interiors, often incorporating fully hollowed-out shoulders”.180
				 
			 
			
			Even more amazing, it seems that more that 30,000 of these vases 
			were found beneath the Step Pyramid of Zoser at Saqqara. 
			
			 
			Christopher Dunn, a toolmaker, wrote an article entitled Advanced 
			Machining in Ancient Egypt, where he notes: 
			
				
				The millions of tons of rock that the Egyptians had quarried for 
			their pyramids and temples - and cut with such superb accuracy - reveal 
			glimpses of a civilization that was technically more advanced than 
			is generally believed. Even though it is thought that millions of 
			tons of rock were cut with simple primitive hand tools, such as 
			copper chisels, adzes and wooden mallets, substantial evidence shows 
			that this is simply not the case.  
				
				  
				
				Even discounting the argument that 
			work-hardened copper would not be suitable for cutting igneous rock, 
			the evidence forces us to look a little harder, and more 
			objectively, when explaining the manufacturing marks scoured on 
			ancient granite by ancient stone craftsmen.[…] 
			 
			
			Although the Egyptians are not given credit for the simple wheel, 
			the machine marks they left on the granite found at Giza suggests a 
			much higher degree of technical accomplishment. Petrie’s conclusion 
			regarding their mechanical abilities shows a proficiency with the 
			straight saw, circular saw, tube-drill, and surprisingly, even the 
			lathe.181 Naturally, Egyptologists do nothing but disparage and 
			attack such views, but they are unable to produce any evidence to 
			support their claims, while there is an ever-growing mountain of 
			evidence to support the ancient technology.  
			
			  
			
			Again, I suggest that 
			Egyptologists ought to be required to have engineering degrees, as 
			well as broader educations in other terms. It is Egyptologists who 
			seem to be the fundamental arbiters of our history, and over and 
			over again, we will find that they are the blind leading the blind. 
			
			 
			Getting back to Dunn, he examined blocks that had been hollowed out 
			with some kind of drill in the Valley Temple at Giza. He noted that 
			the drill marks left in the hole show that it was cutting into the 
			rock at the rate of a tenth of an inch for every revolution of the 
			drill!182  
			
			  
			
			180 Hancock, Fingerprints of 
			the Gods, op cit. 
			181 See: Technologies of Ancient Egypt by Christopher P. Dunn (Bear 
			and Co. 1998). 
			182 Wilson, op. cit. 
			
			  
			
			What is so amazing about that?  
			 
			
			  
			
			As it happens, such a rate 
			cannot be achieved by hand without the application of over a ton of 
			pressure. And that is patently absurd to consider in terms of hand 
			drilling! Dunn inquired of specialists in drilling machinery and was 
			informed that the best drills we have today, spinning at the rate of 
			900 revolutions per minute, can only cut into similar stone at the 
			rate of one ten thousandth of an inch per revolution.  
			 
			
			  
			
			Conclusion? The builders of the pyramids and the creators of the stone vases had 
			drills that either worked 500 times as fast as those we have today, 
			or they had a “secret”. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Colin Wilson tells us: 
			
				
				Another aspect of the problem began to provide Dunn with a glimmer 
			of a solution. A hole drilled into a rock that was a mixture of 
			quartz and feldspar showed that the “drill” had cut faster through 
			the quartz than the feldspar, although quartz is harder than 
			feldspar. The solution that he suggests sounds almost beyond belief. 
			He points out that modern ultrasonic machining uses a tool that 
			depends on vibration.[…]  
				
				  
				
				Quartz crystals are used in the production 
			of ultrasonic sound, and conversely, respond to ultrasonic 
			vibrations. This would explain why the “bit” cut faster through the 
			quartz than the feldspar. What is being suggested sounds, admittedly, absurd: that the 
			Egyptians had some force as powerful as our modern electricity, and 
			that this force was based on sound.183
				 
			 
			
			183 
			Wilson, op. cit. 
			
			  
			
			As Wilson and Hancock point 
			out, this explanation goes a long way toward explaining the vases 
			with swan necks that are hollowed out of such hard and brittle 
			materials. He also notes how embarrassed Petrie would have been to 
			know that similar vases have been removed from strata dated to 4000 
			BC when Egypt was supposed to have been occupied by nomads in tents. 
			
			 
			But, we do still have the fact that there were nomads in tents at 
			that point, and the only solution I can see is that these peoples 
			were survivors of a cataclysmic event, and that they continued to 
			use whatever they could find from their lost civilization. In this 
			way, vases and other artifacts, scavenged from ruins, would be found 
			in any number of “strata” laid down after such an event. It seems 
			that these vases could be evidence that Petrie’s “New Race” 
			pre-dated pharonic Egypt by thousands of years. 
			
			 
			We come back to Edward Leedskalnin who claimed to have discovered 
			the secret of how the pyramids were built.  
			
			  
			
			And the theorists are 
			having a field day! 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			Pythagoras and the Barbarians 
			
			 
			We have touched briefly in earlier sections on the issue of sacred 
			geometry, which is often related to the secret significance of 
			numbers. Most of the current craze for these ideas is usually traced 
			back to Pythagoras. We believe Pythagoras has been maligned by these 
			new age purveyors of sacred geometry and sacred numbers. Naturally, 
			when one is considering the “secret significance” of numbers,
			Pythagorean Mathematics will be among the earliest considerations. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Manly Hall wrote that: 
			
				
				The true key to philosophic mathematics is the famous Forty-seventh 
			Proposition of Pythagoras, erroneously attributed to Euclid. The 
			Forty-seventh Theorem is stated thus: In a right-angled triangle the 
			square described on the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the 
			squares described on the other two sides.184
				 
				  
				
				184 
				Hall, Manly P., 
				
				The Secret Teachings of All Ages (Los Angeles: 
				The Philosophical Research Society 1988) p. LXIX (facing page). 
			 
			
			Everyone who has 
			attended public school and paid the slightest attention in math 
			class knows that one. The problem is: what does it really mean that 
			it is the “true key to philosophic mathematics”? What does C2=A2+B2 
			have to tell us? Accounts of the travels and studies of Pythagoras 
			differ, but most historians agree that he visited many countries and 
			studied at the feet of many masters.  
			  
			
			Supposedly, after having been 
			initiated into the Eleusinian mysteries, he went to Egypt and was 
			initiated into the Mysteries of Isis. He then traveled to Phoenicia 
			and Syria and was initiated into the Mysteries of Adonis. After 
			that, he traveled to the valley of the Euphrates and learned all the 
			secrets of the Chaldeans still living in the area of Babylon. 
			Finally, he traveled to Media and Persia, then to India where he was 
			a pupil and initiate of the Brahmins there. Sounds like he had all 
			the bases covered. 
			
			 Pythagoras was said to have invented the term “philosopher” in 
			preference to the word “sage” since the former meant one who is 
			attempting to find the truth, and the latter means one who knows the 
			truth. Apparently Pythagoras didn’t think he had the whole banana. 
			
			 Pythagoras started a school at Crotona in Southern Italy and 
			gathered students and disciples there whom he supposedly instructed 
			in the principles of the secrets that had been revealed to him. He 
			considered mathematics, music and astronomy to be the foundation of 
			all the arts and sciences. When he was about sixty years old, he 
			married one of his disciples and had seven children. I guess he was 
			a pretty lively senior citizen! His wife was, apparently, quite a 
			woman in her own right, and she carried on his work after he was 
			assassinated by a band of murderers incited to violence by a student 
			whom he refused to initiate.  
			
			  
			
			The accounts of Pythagoras’ murder 
			vary.  
			  
			
			Some say he and all his disciples were killed, others say that 
			he may have escaped because some of his students protected him by 
			sacrificing themselves and that he later died of a broken heart when 
			he realized the apparent fruitlessness of his efforts to illuminate 
			humanity. 
			
			 The experts say that very little remains of the teachings of 
			Pythagoras in the present time unless it has been handed down in 
			secret schools or societies. Naturally, every secret society on the 
			planet claims to have this “initiated” knowledge to one extent or 
			another. It is possible that there exists some of the  
			
			original secret numerical 
			formulas of Pythagoras, but the sad fact is that there is no real 
			evidence of it in the writings that have issued from these groups 
			for the past millennium.  
			
			  
			
			Though everyone discusses Pythagoras, no 
			one seems to know any more than the post-Pythagorean Greek 
			speculators who, as Manley Hall put it,  
			
				
				“talked much, wrote little, 
			knew less, and concealed their ignorance under a series of 
			mysterious hints and promises”.  
			 
			
			There seems to be a lot of that 
			going around these days! Even Plutarch did not pretend to be able to 
			explain the significance of the geometrical diagrams of Pythagoras. 
			However, he did make the most interesting suggestion that the 
			relationship which Pythagoras established between the geometrical 
			solids and the Gods was the result of images seen in the Egyptian 
			temples. The question we would ask is: what do geometrical solids 
			have to do with “Gods”? 
			
			 
			
			
			Albert Pike, the great Masonic symbolist, also admitted that there 
			were many things that he couldn’t figure out.  
			
			  
			
			In his Symbolism for 
			the 32nd and 33rd degrees he wrote: 
			
				
				I do not understand why the 7 should be called Minerva, or the cube, 
			Neptune. ...Undoubtedly the names given by the Pythagoreans to the 
			different numbers were themselves enigmatical and symbolic - and there 
			is little doubt that in the time of Plutarch the meanings these 
			names concealed were lost. Pythagoras had succeeded too well in 
			concealing his symbols with a veil that was from the first 
			impenetrable, without his oral explanation.185
				 
			 
			
			Manly Hall writes: 
			
				
				This uncertainty shared by all true students of the subject proves 
			conclusively that it is unwise to make definite statements founded 
			on the indefinite and fragmentary information available concerning 
			the Pythagorean system of mathematical philosophy.186
				 
			 
			
			185 Cited by Hall, ibid., p. LXIX. 
			186 Ibid. 
			
			  
			
			With what 
			little we have examined thus far, we are beginning to realize how 
			true this latter remark is. Of course, in the present time, there is 
			a whole raft of folks who don’t let such remarks stop them. Any 
			number of modern gurus claim to have discovered the secrets of 
			“Sacred Geometry”! Not only that, they don’t seem to have even 
			studied the matter deeply at all, missing many of the salient points 
			that are evident in the fragments of Pythagorean teachings. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Regarding this, there is a passage in Foucault’s Pendulum, by 
			Umberto Eco, that explicates the problem: 
			
				
				Amid all the nonsense there are some unimpeachable truths... I 
			invite you to go and measure [an arbitrarily selected] kiosk. You 
			will see that the length of the counter is one hundred and 
			forty-nine centimeters - in other words, one hundred-billionth of the 
			distance between the earth and the sun. The height at the rear, one 
			hundred and seventy-six centimeters, divided by the width of the 
			window, fifty-six centimeters, is 3.14. The height at the front 
			is nineteen decimeters, equal, in other words, to the number of 
			years of the Greek lunar cycle.  
				  
				
				The sum of the heights of the two 
			front corners is one hundred and ninety times two plus one hundred 
			and seventy-six times two, which equals seven hundred and 
			thirty-two, the date of the victory at Poitiers. The thickness of 
			the counter is 3.10 centimeters, and the width of the cornice of the 
			window is 8.8 centimeters. Replacing the numbers before the decimals 
			by the corresponding letters of the alphabet, we obtain C for ten 
			and H for eight, or C10H8, which is the formula for naphthalene. 
				
				 ...With numbers you can do anything you like. Suppose I have the 
			sacred number 9 and I want to get the number 1314, date of the 
			execution of Jacques de Molay - a date dear to anyone who professes 
			devotion to the Templar tradition of knighthood. ...Multiply nine by 
			one hundred and forty-six, the fateful day of the destruction of 
			Carthage. How did I arrive at this? I divided thirteen hundred and 
			fourteen by two, by three, et cetera, until I found a satisfying 
			date. I could also have divided thirteen hundred and fourteen by 
			6.28, the double of 3.14, and I would have got two hundred and nine. 
			That is the year Attalus I, king of Pergamon, ascended the throne. 
				
				 You see? ...The universe is a great symphony of numerical 
			correspondences... numbers and their symbolisms provide a path to 
			special knowledge. But if the world, below and above, is a system of 
			correspondences where tout se tient, it’s natural for the [lottery] 
			kiosk and the pyramid, both works of man, to reproduce in their 
			structure, unconsciously, the harmonies of the cosmos.187
				 
			 
			
			187 Eco, Umberto, Foucault’s Pendulum, (San Diego, 
			New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1988) pp. 288-289. 
			
			  
			
			The idea 
			has been promoted with great vigor for over a thousand years that 
			so-called Kabbalists and “interpreters of mysteries” can discover 
			with their incredibly tortuous methods The Truth. This arrogance 
			completely misses the point of a truth that is far more ancient: 
			Mathematics is the language of Nature. The Pythagoreans declared 
			arithmetic to be the mother of the mathematical sciences.  
			
			  
			
			This idea 
			was based on the fact that geometry, music, and astronomy are 
			dependent upon arithmetic, but arithmetic is not dependent upon 
			them. In this sense, geometry may be removed but arithmetic will 
			remain; but if arithmetic were removed, geometry will be eliminated. 
			In the same way, music depends on arithmetic. Eliminating music 
			affects arithmetic only by limiting one of its expressions. 
			
			 
			The size, form, and motion of the celestial bodies are determined by 
			the use of geometry and their harmony and rhythm by the use of 
			music. If astronomy is taken away, neither geometry nor music is 
			harmed; but if geometry and music are done away with, astronomy is 
			destroyed. The priority of both geometry and music to astronomy is 
			established and arithmetic is prior to all of them, being primary 
			and fundamental. Playing endless games with numbers demonstrates 
			only that which cannot be otherwise.  
			
			  
			
			The real 
			secret seems to be much more profound and most, if not nearly all, 
			“seekers” of truths never penetrate beyond the surface of the 
			matter. Nevertheless, we have now reached the point where we have 
			some idea that there was an ancient technology that utilized simple 
			arithmetic, and geometry, or spatial relationships, in conjunction 
			with sound, to accomplish something of great import. We have also 
			come to the idea that this ancient technology was the science of the 
			mastery of space and time and gravity. This is the great secret of 
			the Golden Age.  
			
			  
			
			This is why their civilization was based on 
			different elements than our own. Aside from the fact that cataclysms 
			may have washed away most of the evidence of this civilization, we 
			have here an additional reason for the lack of metal and other such 
			artifacts of the type we would consider to be evidence of 
			“civilization”. 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			The Dancing God 
			
			 
			Getting back to our spinning Edward Leedskalnin in his airplane 
			seat, we realize that he must have stumbled onto this secret and was 
			able to utilize it to some extent. But Leedskalnin didn’t have a 
			landscape covered with megaliths to collect and store energy. Edward 
			had an airplane seat suspended from the ceiling by a chain. How can 
			this possibly give us a hint about what the ancients were doing? 
			 
			
			  
			
			Searching for clues as to how the ancients utilized this technology, 
			we find the following most interesting item. Diodorus Siculus, 
			writing in the first century BC, gives us a description of Britain 
			based, in part, on the voyage of Pytheas of Massilia, who sailed 
			around Britain in 300 BC. 
			
			 
			As for the inhabitants, they are simple and far removed from the 
			shrewdness and vice which characterize our day. Their way of living 
			is modest, since they are well clear of the luxury that is begotten 
			of wealth. The island is also thickly populated and its climate is 
			extremely cold, as one would expect, since it actually lies under 
			the Great Bear. It is held by many kings and potentates, who for the 
			most part live at peace among themselves.188  
			
			  
			
			188 Diodorus of Sicily, English translation by C. H. 
			Oldfather, Loeb Classical Library, Volumes II and III. London, 
			William Heinemann, and Cambridge, Mass., USA, Harvard University 
			Press, 1935 and 1939. 
			
			  
			
			Diodorus then tells a 
			fascinating story about the Hyperboreans that was obviously of 
			legendary character already when he was writing: 
			
				
				Of those who have written about the ancient myths, Hecateus and 
			certain others say that in the regions beyond the land of the Celts 
			(Gaul) there lies in the ocean an island no smaller than Sicily. 
			This island, the account continues, is situated in the north, and is 
			inhabited by the Hyperboreans, who are called by that name because 
			their home is beyond the point whence the north wind blows; and the 
			land is both fertile and productive of every 
			crop, and since it has an unusually temperate climate it produces 
			two harvests each year.189
				 
			 
			
			Now, it seems that there is little doubt 
			that Diodorus is describing the same location, but we notice that 
			the climate is so vastly different in the two descriptions that we 
			can hardly make the connection. However, let us just suppose that 
			his description of Britain was based on the climate that prevailed 
			at the time he was writing, and the legendary description of the 
			Hyperboreans was based on a previous climatic condition that was 
			preserved in the story.  
			
			  
			
			Diodorus stresses that he is recounting 
			something very ancient as he goes on to say: 
			
				
				The Hyperboreans also have a language, we are informed, which is 
			peculiar to them, and are most friendly disposed towards the Greeks, 
			and especially towards the Athenians and the Delians, who have 
			inherited this goodwill from most ancient times. The myth also 
			relates that certain Greeks visited the Hyperboreans and left behind 
			them costly votive offerings bearing inscriptions in Greek letters. 
			And in the same way Abaris, a Hyperborean, came to Greece in ancient 
			times and renewed the goodwill and kinship of his people to the 
			Delians.190  
			 
			
			Diodorus remark about the relations between the 
			Hyperboreans and the Athenians triggers in our minds the memory of 
			the statement of Plato that the Atlanteans were at war with the 
			Athenians, and we wonder if the Hyperboreans are the real “early 
			Athenians”. After all, the Greeks are said to be “Sons of the North 
			Wind”, Boreas.  
			
			  
			
			Herodotus expounds upon the relationship of the Hyperboreans to the Delians: 
			
				
				Certain sacred offerings wrapped up in wheat straw come from the 
			Hyperboreans into Scythia, whence they are taken over by the 
			neighbouring peoples in succession until they get as far west as the 
			Adriatic: from there they are sent south, and the first Greeks to 
			receive them are the Dodonaeans. 
				 
				
				  
				
				Then, continuing southward, they 
			reach the Malian gulf, cross to Euboea, and are passed on from town 
			to town as far as Carystus. Then they skip Andros, the Carystians 
			take them to Tenos, and the Tenians to Delos. That is how these 
			things are said to reach Delos at the present time.191
				 
			 
			
			189 Ibid. 
			190 Ibid. 
			191 Herodotus, The Histories, Book IV, trans. Aubrey De Selincourt, 
			revised John Marincola (London:
			Penguin 1972) p. 226 
			
			  
			
			The legendary 
			connection between the Hyperboreans and the Delians leads us to 
			another interesting remark of Herodotus who tells us that Leto, the 
			mother of Apollo, was born on the island of the Hyperboreans. That 
			there was regular contact between the Greeks and the Hyperboreans 
			over many centuries does not seem to be in doubt. The Hyperboreans 
			were said to have introduced the Greeks to the worship of Apollo, 
			but it is just as likely that the relationship goes much 
			further back. Yes, this is contrary to the idea that culture flowed 
			from south to north, but we are writing a contrary book; so don’t 
			let that bother you!  
			
			  
			
			Herodotus has another interesting thing to say 
			about the Hyperboreans and their sending of sacred offerings to 
			Delos: 
			
				
				On the first occasion they were sent in charge of two girls, whose 
			names the Delians say were Hyperoche and Laodice. To protect the 
			girls on the journey, the Hyperboreans sent five men to accompany 
			them … the two Hyperborean girls died in Delos, and the boys and 
			girls of the island still cut their hair as a sign of mourning for 
			them… There is also a Delphic story that before the time of 
			Hyperoche and Laodice, two other Hyperborean girls, Arge and Opis, 
			came to Delos by the same route. …Arge and Opis came to the island 
			at the same time as Apollo and Artemis…192
				 
			 
			
			Herodotus mentions at 
			another point, when discussing the lands of the “barbarians”,  
			
				
				“All 
			these except the Hyperboreans, were continually encroaching upon one 
			another’s territory”.  
			 
			
			Without putting words in Herodotus’ mouth, it 
			seems to suggest that the Hyperboreans were not warlike at all. 
			
			 
			A further clue about the religion of the Hyperboreans comes from the 
			myths of Orpheus. It is said that when Dionysus invaded Thrace, 
			Orpheus did not see fit to honor him but instead preached the evils 
			of sacrificial murder to the men of Thrace. He taught “other sacred 
			mysteries” having to do with Apollo, whom he believed to be the 
			greatest of all Gods. Dionysus became so enraged; he set the Maenads 
			on Orpheus at Apollo’s temple where Orpheus was a priest.  
			
			  
			
			They burst 
			in, murdered their husbands who were assembled to hear Orpheus 
			speak, tore Orpheus limb from limb, and threw his head into the 
			river Hebrus where it floated downstream still singing. It was 
			carried on the sea to the island of Lesbos. Another version of the 
			story is that Zeus killed Orpheus with a thunderbolt for divulging 
			divine secrets. He was responsible for instituting the Mysteries of 
			Apollo in Thrace, Hecate in Aegina, and Subterrene Demeter at 
			Sparta.193  
			
			  
			
			192 Herodotus, The 
			Histories, pp. 226-227. 
			193 See: Graves, Robert, The Greek Myths (London: Penguin, London) 
			1992 
			
			  
			
			And this brings us to a further revelation of Diodorus 
			regarding the Hyperboreans: 
			
				
				And there is also on the island both a magnificent sacred precinct 
			of Apollo and a notable temple, which is adorned with many votive 
			offerings and is spherical in shape. Furthermore, a city is there 
			which is sacred to this God, and the majority of its inhabitants are 
			players on the cithara; and these continually play on this 
			instrument in the temple and sing hymns of praise to the God, 
			glorifying his deeds… They say also that the moon, as viewed from 
			this island, appears to be but a little distance from the earth and 
			to have upon it prominences, like those of the earth, which are 
			visible to the eye.  
				  
				
				The account is also given that the God visits 
			the island every nineteen years, the period in which the return of 
			the stars to the same place in the heavens is accomplished, and for 
			this reason the Greeks call the nineteen-year period the “year of Meton”. 
			At the time of this appearance of the God he both plays on the 
			cithara and dances continuously the night through from the vernal 
			equinox until the rising of the Pleiades, expressing in this manner 
			his delight in his successes. And the kings of this city and the 
			supervisors of the sacred precinct are called Boreades, since they 
			are descendants of Boreas, and the succession to these positions is 
			always kept in their family.194
				 
			 
			
			194 Diodorus, op. cit.. 
			 
			
			I would like to note immediately how 
			similar the above story of the Maenads murdering their husbands is 
			to the story of the daughters of Danaus murdering their husbands on 
			the wedding night connected to the story of the massacre at the 
			Cloisters of Ambrius attributed much later to Hengist and Horsa. 
			 
			
			  
			
			Keeping in mind that the Danaans were the family of the hero Perseus 
			who cut off the head of Medusa, while comparing this to the 
			beheading of Orpheus and his “singing” head floating down the river. 
			The two themes, wives murdering husbands and a significant beheading 
			are startling enough to give us pause. Was an original legend then 
			later adapted to a different usage, assimilated to a different group 
			or tribe? More than once? 
			
			 
			In any event, we have discovered a most interesting little 
			collection of things all in one place. First a “round temple” on an 
			island that can only be Britain, may be describing Stonehenge and 
			the way in which it was utilized by a group of people. Next we see 
			that Diodorus is suggesting that the 19-year lunar calendar is a 
			product of the Hyperboreans and that it relates to a period in which 
			the “return of the stars” is accomplished.  
			
			  
			
			We realize immediately 
			that these “stars” must refer to a geometric relationship between 
			the Sun, Moon and Earth, rather than the “stars” in terms of real 
			stars and the planets because they certainly do not “return” to any 
			particular position every nineteen years. And we now suspect that 
			this may have something to do with a gravitational node of a 
			three-body system. We begin to think that these ancient people 
			really knew something! In the Temple of Apollo, we also find that 
			there are musicians whose job it is to continually play in the 
			temple and sing, and the most famous of ancient singers and 
			musicians is associated with the worship of Apollo. This suggests to 
			us the possible use of sound for something; the utilization of 
			gravitational nodes, perhaps? 
			
			 
			There is an additional puzzle here. What did it mean that every 
			nineteen years a God “dances” from the vernal equinox until the 
			rising of the Pleiades?  
			
			  
			
			This suggests to us a very specific date is 
			being recorded in this myth. The heliacal rising of the Pleiades 
			does not happen every 19 years. So, aside from telling us about a 
			regular event that occurred every nineteen years, the myth has 
			recorded something else very significant, the date of which is 
			internal to the myth. When did the Pleiades rise just before the sun 
			on the vernal equinox? 
			
			 
			There are many who assume that a “heliacal rising” means that a star 
			or constellation is in conjunction with the sun. But this is 
			probably not correct. The ancients were practicing observational 
			astronomy.  
			
			  
			
			Otto Neugebauer, in his many studies regarding what the 
			ancients did or did not know about science and mathematics, noted 
			the following: 
			
				
				When we watch the stars rise over the eastern horizon, we see them 
			appear night after night at the same spot on the horizon. But when 
			we extend our observation into the period of twilight, fewer and 
			fewer stars will be recognizable when they cross the horizon, and 
			near sunrise all stars will have faded out altogether.  
				 
				
				  
				
				Let us 
			suppose that a certain star S was seen just rising at the beginning 
			of dawn but vanished from sight within a very short time because of 
			the rapid approach of daylight. We call this phenomenon the 
			“heliacal rising” of S, using a term of Greek astronomy. Let us 
			assume that we use this phenomenon as the indication of the end of 
			“night” and consider S as the star of the “last hour of night”. […] 
				 
				  
				
				We may continue in the same way for several days, but during this 
			time a definite change takes place. […]  
				  
				
				Obviously, after some lapse 
			of time, it no longer makes sense to take S as the indicator of the 
			last hour of night. But there are new stars that can take the place 
			of S. Thus year after year S may serve for some days as the star of 
			the last hour, to be replaced in regular order by other stars.195
				 
			 
			
			195 Neugebauer, op. cit. 
			
			  
			
			In 
			order to observe a heliacal rising of a star or group of stars, they 
			must rise long enough before the sun to be “observed”, because as 
			soon as the sun rises, the stars can no longer be seen. The heliacal 
			rising of the Pleiades would have to occur at least 36 minutes 
			before the sun comes up, in order to be seen.  
			
			  
			
			So, the real question 
			seems to be:  
			
				
					- 
					
					When did the Pleiades rise around half an hour before 
			the sun, at the time of the equinox?   
					- 
					
					When were the Pleiades the 
			stars of the “last hour of the night”, and what might have been the 
			significance of this event?   
				 
			 
			
			Certain “standard” texts, written by 
			individuals who have not taken into account the observational nature 
			of a heliacal rising, have given 2300 BC as the date, because this 
			was when the Pleiades were conjunct the Sun on the Vernal equinox. 
			However, after careful calculations of our own, as well as 
			assistance by expert astronomers, the date of the actual heliacal 
			rising of the Pleiades, in the terms that Neugebauer has given us, 
			occurred on April 16, 3100 BC. This date is most certainly correct 
			as we will see further on. 
			
			 
			There is an even greater mystery here regarding the Pleiades.  
			
			  
			
			In the 
			cave of Lascaux, there is a prehistoric image of an Auroch, which is 
			the largest picture in the whole assembly of images, and is painted 
			almost entirely on the ceiling of the cave. Above the back of the 
			Auroch, a strange figure of a cluster of six floating points can be 
			seen. The distribution of the dots does not seem to be haphazard, 
			but rather shows a clear structural element.  
			
			  
			
			It looks, in fact, like 
			an exact portrayal of the constellation Taurus with the star cluster 
			of the Pleiades placed precisely as 
			they actually relate to the 
			constellation. The Navajo in America have also portrayed the 
			Pleiades in exactly this same six-star arrangement in modern times, 
			as handed down to them by their ancestors.196 The constellation 
			Taurus was originally a complete image of a bull in the sky. The 
			Babylonians called it the heavenly bull, and the Pleiades were 
			recognized as the “bristle on the neck of the bull”. At some point, 
			the bull was cut in half to create Aries and Cetus, the whale. 
			
			  
			
			196 Chamberlain, Von Del, 
			“Navajo Constellations in Literature, Art, Artifact and a New Mexico 
			Rock Art Site”, Archaeoastronomy 6 (1-4):48-58, 1983. 
			 
			So here we have a very interesting confluence of seemingly unrelated 
			elements: 
			
				
				We will pass from that subject for the moment to return to our 
			matter of the dancing God who came every 19 years to Stonehenge, and 
			how it may relate to spinning in airplane seats, producing sounds, 
			and overcoming gravity  -  and perhaps even space and time and matter. 
			 
				
				  
				
				What we find is that these elements are all connected in such a way 
			that we suspect that they were elements of a technology that enabled 
			an entire group of people to live in harmony, and to produce all 
			they needed so that the artifacts of civilization, as we know them, 
			were not required by these peoples.  
				
				  
				
				What is more, they seem to have 
			been related to their ability to perform feats of which we are 
			incapable with all our technology. These “wonders” that are the 
			stuff of myth to us now, were, apparently, part of their daily 
			reality. 
			 
			
			In searching for additional clues in the nature religions associated 
			with the symbols of the Holy Grail, we find that dancing was part of 
			the archaic grail ensemble. The Sword Dances, Morris Dances, and
			Mumming Plays, for example, seem to be an inherited tradition of 
			solemn ceremonial dances performed at stated seasons.  
			
			  
			
			And that is 
			exactly what Diodorus has told us: The God danced all night every 19 
			years at the time of the Equinox. 
			
			 
			Jessie Weston, among others, was moved to think of these dances and 
			the entire Grail cycle ensemble as a ritual designed to “preserve 
			and promote the regular and ordered sequence of the processes of 
			Nature”. In other words, the disjecta membra of the advanced 
			technology of a vanished civilization. 
			
			 
			It seems to us, from looking at the evidence of the absolute reality 
			of what these people were capable of doing, that the dances, the 
			myths, and the rites, all point to an archaic technology that is 
			preserved idealistically as “promoting the processes of Nature”, but 
			it was actually a direct interaction with Nature that resulted in 
			the manifest production of all that was needed by the peoples in a 
			literal and immediate sense. 
			
			 
			The earliest recorded Sword Dancers are the Maruts, the attendants 
			of the God Indra.  
			
			  
			
			They are a group of youths of equal age and 
			identical parentage and are always dressed alike, and they are 
			always dancers. Throughout the Rg-Veda the 
			Maruts are referred to as,  
			
				
				“Gold bedecked dancers… with songs of 
			praise they danced round the spring… When ye Maruts spear-armed 
			dance, [the Heavens] stream together like waves of water”.197
				 
			 
			
			The 
			image of the “spear armed” dancing of course has led people to think 
			that they are dancing with spears, but what if it means something 
			altogether different?  
			
			  
			
			Anyone who has watched traditional Celtic 
			dances is immediately struck by the stiff armed posture of the 
			dancers who only move the lower parts of their bodies. Dancing in 
			perfect synchrony on a wooden platform produces a hypnotic and 
			thrilling effect, and we find here a possible system of elevation of 
			consciousness that might produce vibratory effects not only in 
			stone, but also in the very cells of both the dancers and the 
			audience.  
			
			  
			
			More than this, when we consider the immobility of the 
			upper part of the body, and the stylized motion of the lower part of 
			the body, we think of the “length of string” attached to a pendulum 
			that accesses other realities. We may also consider the addition of 
			a real “lance” as a “lengthener” of the “string”, or something that 
			was incorporated to connect the dancer to a specific frequency. Add 
			to it very specific music, utilized to amplify the energetic 
			effects, or sound that was a result of the dance, and we begin to 
			see a very different picture of the dance of Apollo at Stonehenge 
			every 19 years. 
			
			  
			
			In fact, we are reminded of that curious story where 
			an alchemist supposedly told Jacques Bergier: 
			
				
				Certain geometrical arrangements of highly purified materials are 
			enough to release atomic forces without having recourse to either 
			electricity or vacuum techniques.198
				 
			 
			
			Most especially when we recall 
			this: 
			
				
				For it is by fire and in fire that our hemisphere will soon be 
			tried. And just as by means of fire, gold is separated from impure 
			metals, so, Scripture says, the good will be separated from the 
			wicked, on the great Day of Judgment. […]199
				 
			 
			
			The Maruts were the 
			companions of Indra, his helpers in the fight against his 
			adversaries, the evil Gods who afflict mankind. But more than this, 
			these dancers, (Dan-cers) were bringers of all necessities to the 
			people in some magical, mysterious, and astonishing way: 
			
				
				The adorable Maruts, armed with bright lances and cuirassed with 
			golden breastplates, enjoy vigorous existence; may the cars of the 
			quick-moving Maruts arrive for our good. …Bringers of rain and 
			fertility, shedding water, augmenting food. …Givers of abundant 
			food. …Your milchkine are never dry. …We invoke the food-laden 
			chariots of the Maruts.200
				 
			 
			
			197 Von Schroeder, Mysterium und Mimus, 
			quoted by Jessie Weston in From Ritual to Romance, p. 78. 
			 
			
			198 Pauwels and Bergier, op. cit. 
			199 Fulcanelli, Mystery, op. cit. p. 149. 
			200 Rg-Veda, Vol III. 
			 
			We now begin to see the wild orgies of the New Year festivals, the 
			Dionysian frenzies, and the Nature cults with parades of ecstatic 
			men and women bordering on being in a state of madness, as 
			corruptions of what was obviously an original, formalized series of 
			dance type activities.  
			
			  
			
			And this makes us think of the Maze. The 
			Labyrinth. Troy. Crete. Egypt? 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			The Labyrinth 
			
			 
			Hundreds of mazes and labyrinths are found scattered across Europe, 
			parts of Africa, Asia and the Americas. They are composed of turf, 
			hedges, stone, brick, or tile work on floors. There are paintings 
			and carvings of mazes on rocks that are incredibly ancient. One of 
			the oldest representations that I have found is a 20,000-year-old 
			bracelet carved from a single piece of mammoth ivory, found at 
			Mezin, Ukraine.  
			
			  
			
			This piece has a magnificent “Greek Meander” or 
			“maze” design which predates any other maze we are going to discuss 
			here, but most definitely offers a clue since this area of the world 
			is that hot-spot of Grail legends identified by Littleton and Malcor. 
			
			 
			What most people know about the maze, or labyrinth, is due to the 
			myth of Theseus and Ariadne. Briefly, the tale tells of King Minos 
			of Crete, who demanded tribute from Athens, after defeating them in 
			a war. The tribute was an annual shipment of seven youths and seven 
			maidens who were sacrificed to the Minotaur by sending them into the 
			maze, the specially constructed home of the beast, built by the 
			great architect, Daedalus.  
			
			  
			
			The labyrinth was so cleverly constructed 
			that even Daedalus had difficulty navigating in it. The Athenian 
			young people would wander around in the maze, lost, until the 
			Minotaur, half bull (top half) and half man (bottom half) caught up 
			with them and devoured them. This, of course, reminds us of 
			Herodotus’ story of the Hyperborean girls sent to Delos bearing 
			gifts, who died while there under what seem to be mysterious 
			circumstances. 
			
			 
			As a side note, we would like to draw attention to the fact that 
			Daedalus, the “great architect”, was connected to a king named 
			Minos. Another king named Menes was the great unifier of Egypt, 
			builder of the great city of Memphis, and a famous temple of 
			Hephaestus there. This is dated to around 3100 BC, and we wonder if 
			the image of the half bull, half man might not be a clue to a date 
			such as the point at which the constellation Taurus was “cut in 
			half” to make room for Aries, the ram, who represents Agni, God of 
			fire.  
			
			  
			
			Hephaestus is, after all, the Greek version of the Smith God. 
			Discovering a great architect connected, even indirectly, to a great 
			unifier of two kingdoms and builder of a great Temple on the one 
			side, and connected to another king with a similar name, and builder 
			of a great labyrinth which is connected to a “power in the center”,  -  the Minotaur, keeping in mind the legends of the building of 
			Stonehenge, the “cloisters of Ambrius” where the God danced all 
			night in the center around 3100 BC, makes us wonder if this is not 
			all a clue to the manifestation of a certain power that has to do 
			with sound and gravity and stones and so forth.  
			
			  
			
			We are naturally 
			drawn to make connections between these matters and the myth of 
			Solomon and Hiram Abiff and the Ark of the Covenant. When we think 
			of the Temple of Solomon (about which we will learn a great deal 
			further on), which was built to house the Ark, and we then think of 
			the labyrinth which was built 
			to house a monster, we naturally wonder just what is going on here? 
			We also note that the victims of King Minos of Crete were 
			“Athenians”, and we remember what Plato said about the war between 
			Atlantis and “Athens”, even if we don’t put any stock in it actually 
			being the Athens we know today. 
			
			 
			According to the myth, the labyrinth was built for one reason only: 
			to hide the Minotaur, which was a source of horror and shame to 
			Minos, whose wife had given birth to the monster after mating with a 
			bull. This really doesn’t follow logic since the victims were 
			rounded up in public, and everyone apparently knew about the 
			Minotaur. 
			
			 
			In South Africa, a popular Zulu game is played where a maze is drawn 
			on the ground, and the players take turns “finding the way to the 
			king’s hut” which is at the center. The game is played with toys 
			carved in the shape of bulls. It seems that, thousands of miles from 
			Crete, the same elements of the legend are played out from time 
			immemorial: kingship, bulls, and conflict at the center of a 
			labyrinth. Excavations at Knossos have indeed uncovered evidence of 
			a bull cult practiced in a maze like “palace” of hundreds of 
			chambers and corridors.  
			
			  
			
			There were innumerable images of bulls in 
			bas-reliefs, small sculptures, bull-shaped vessels, seals and 
			imprints of seals, as well as stylized bulls’ horns. All of these 
			things linking the dynasty of Minos with bulls suggested that the 
			vitality of the Minoan kings, like that of the pharaohs of ancient 
			Egypt, was identified with the bull-God. What is more, ancient Greek 
			writers came right out and said that the labyrinth of Minos was 
			modeled on an original in northern Egypt. Very little survives of 
			this Egyptian marvel except for a few brick courses.  
			
			  
			
			What Herodotus 
			had to say about it is rather fascinating: 
			
				
				Being set free after the reign of the priest of Hephaistos, the 
			Egyptians, since they could not live any time without a king, set up 
			over them twelve kings, having divided all Egypt into twelve parts. 
				 
				  
				
				These made intermarriages with one another and reigned, making 
			agreement that they would not put down one another by force, nor 
			seek to get an advantage over one another, but would live in perfect 
			friendship: and the reason why they made these agreements, guarding 
			them very strongly from violation, was this, namely that an oracle 
			had been given to them at first when they began to exercise their 
			rule, that he of them who should pour a libation with a bronze cup 
			in the temple of Hephaistos, should be king of all Egypt (for they 
			used to assemble together in all the temples). 
				  
				
				Moreover they resolved to join all together and leave a memorial of 
			themselves; and having so resolved they caused to be made a 
			labyrinth situated a little above the lake of Moeris and nearly 
			opposite to that which is called the City of Crocodiles. This I saw 
			myself, and I found it greater than words can say. For if one should 
			put together and reckon up all the buildings and all the great works 
			produced by the Hellenes, they would prove to be inferior in labour 
			and expense to this labyrinth, though it is true that both the 
			temple at Ephesos and that at Samos are works worthy of note.
  
				
				The pyramids also were greater than words can say, and each one of 
			them is equal to many works of the Hellenes, great as they may be; 
			but the labyrinth surpasses even the pyramids. It has twelve courts 
			covered in, with gates facing one another, six upon the North side 
			and six upon the South, joining on one to another, and the same wall 
			surrounds them all outside; and there are in it two kinds of 
			chambers, the one kind below the 
			ground and the other above upon these, three thousand in number, of 
			each kind fifteen hundred.  
				  
				
				The upper set of chambers we ourselves 
			saw, going through them, and we tell of them having looked upon them 
			with our own eyes; but the chambers under ground we heard about 
			only; for the Egyptians who had charge of them were not willing on 
			any account to show them, saying that here were the sepulchres of 
			the kings who had first built this labyrinth and of the sacred 
			crocodiles. 
				
				 Accordingly we speak of the chambers below by what we received from 
			hearsay, while those above we saw ourselves and found them to be 
			works of more than human greatness. For the passages through the 
			chambers, and the goings this way and that way through the courts, 
			which were admirably adorned, afforded endless matter for marvel, as 
			we went through from a court to the chambers beyond it, and from the 
			chambers to colonnades, and from the colonnades to other rooms, and 
			then from the chambers again to other courts.  
				  
				
				Over the whole of 
			these is a roof made of stone like the walls; and the walls are 
			covered with figures carved upon them, each court being surrounded 
			with pillars of white stone fitted together most perfectly; and at 
			the end of the labyrinth, by the corner of it, there is a pyramid of 
			forty fathoms, upon which large figures are carved, and to this 
			there is a way made under ground.201
				 
			 
			
			201 Herodutus, op. cit. Bk II:147. 
			 
			
			What was Herodotus describing?  
			
			  
			
			He declared all the great architectural works of the Greeks and 
			Egyptians, including the pyramids, to be “inferior in labour and 
			expense to this labyrinth”. We would also like to note that there 
			were no references to bulls hidden in the Egyptian labyrinth; 
			rather, in the hidden underground chambers were the “sepulchres of 
			the kings who had first built this labyrinth and of the sacred 
			crocodiles”.  
			
			  
			
			Diodorus has a slightly different story about who built 
			this famous labyrinth: 
			
				
				When the king died the government was recovered by Egyptians and 
			they appointed a native king Mendes, whom some call Mares. Although 
			he was responsible for no military achievements whatsoever, he did 
			build himself what is called the Labyrinth as a tomb, an edifice 
			which is wonderful not so much for its size as for the inimitable 
			skill with which it was built; for once in, it is impossible to find 
			one’s way out again without difficulty, unless one lights upon a 
			guide who is perfectly acquainted with it.  
				  
				
				It is even said by some 
			that Daedalus crossed over to Egypt and, in wonder at the skill 
			shown in the building, built for Minos, King of Crete, a labyrinth 
			like that in Egypt, in which, so the tales goes, the creature called 
			the Minotaur was kept. Be that as it may, the Cretan Labyrinth has 
			completely disappeared, either through the destruction wrought by 
			some ruler or through the ravages of time; but the Egyptian 
			Labyrinth remains absolutely perfect in its entire construction down 
			to my time. […] 
				
				 For they chose a site beside the channel leading into Lake Moeris in 
			Libya and there constructed their tomb of the finest stone, laying 
			down an oblong as the shape and a stade as the size of each 
			side, while in respect of carving and other works of craftsmanship 
			they left no room for their successors to surpass them.  
				  
				
				For, when 
			one had entered the sacred enclosure, one found a temple surrounded 
			by columns, 40 to each side, and this building had a roof made of a 
			single stone, carved with panels and richly adorned with excellent 
			paintings. It contained memorials of the homeland of each of the 
			kings as well as of the temples and sacrifices carried out in it, 
			all skillfully worked in paintings of the greatest beauty. Generally 
			it is said that the king conceived their tomb on such an expensive 
			and prodigious scale that if they had not been deposed before its 
			completion, they would not have been able to give their successors 
			any opportunity to surpass them in architectural feats.202
				 
			 
			
			Next 
			there is the report of Strabo: 
			
				
				In addition to these things there is the edifice of the Labyrinth 
			which is a building quite equal to the Pyramids and nearby the tomb 
			of the king who built the Labyrinth. There is at the point where one 
			first enters the channel, about 30 or 40 stades along the way, a 
			flat trapezium-shaped site which contains both a village and a great 
			palace made up of many palaces equal in number to that of the nomes 
			in former times; for such is the number of peristyle courts which 
			lie contiguous with one another, all in one row and backing on one 
			wall, as though one had a long wall with the courts lying before it, 
			and the passages into the courts lie opposite the wall.  
				  
				
				Before the 
			entrances there lie what might be called hidden chambers which are 
			long and many in number and have paths running through one another 
			which twist and turn, so that no one can enter or leave any court 
			without a guide. And the wonder of it is the roofs of each chambers 
			are made of single stones and the width of the hidden chambers is 
			spanned in the same way by monolithic beams of outstanding size; for 
			nowhere is wood or any other material included. And if one mounts 
			onto the roof, at no great height because the building has only one 
			story, it is possible to get a view of a plain of masonry made of 
			such stones, and, if one drops back down from there into the courts, 
			it is possible to see them lying there in row each supported by 27 
			monolithic pillars; the walls too are made up in stones of no less a 
			size. 
				
				 At the end of this building, which occupies an area of more than a 
			stade, stands the tomb, a pyramid on a oblong base, each side about 
			4 “plethora” in length and the height about the same; the name of 
			the man buried there was Imandes. The reason for making the courts 
			so many is said to be the fact that it was customary for all nomes 
			to gather there according to rank with their own priests and 
			priestesses, for the purpose of sacrifice, divine-offering, and 
			judgment on the most important matters.  
				  
				
				And each of the nomes was 
			lodged in the court appointed to it. And above this city stands 
			Abydos, in which there is the Memnonium, a palace wonderfully 
			constructed of massive stonework in the same way as we have said the 
			Labyrinth was built, though the Memnonium differs in being simple in 
			structure.203  
			 
			
			202 Diodorus Siculus, op. cit., two passages in his 
			history, Book I, 61 and 66.  
			
			203 Strabo (ca. 64 BC  -  AD 19): Three 
			passages in his geography, Book 17, I, 3 and 37 and 42. 
			 
			
			Pliny tells us still another version of the stories about this 
			amazing structure: 
			
				
				Let us speak also of labyrinths, quite the most extraordinary works 
			on which men have spent their money, but not, as may be thought, 
			figments of the imagination. There still exists even now in Egypt in 
			the Heracleopolite Nome the one which was built first, according to 
			tradition 3,600 years ago by king Petesuchis or Tithois, though 
			Herodotus ascribes the whole work to Twelve Kings and Psammetichus, 
			the latest of them. Various reasons are given for building it. 
			Demoteles claims that it was the palace of Moteris, Lyceas the tomb 
			of Moeris, but the majority of writers take the view that it was 
			built as a temple to the Sun, and this is generally accepted. 
				 
				  
				
				At any 
			rate, that Daedalus used this as the model for the Labyrinth which 
			he built in Crete is beyond doubt, but it is equally clear that he 
			imitated only 100th part of it which contains twisting paths and 
			passages which advance and retreat-all impossible to negotiate. The 
			reason for this is not that within a small compass it involves one 
			in mile upon mile of walking, as we see in tessellated floors or the 
			displays given by boys on the Campus, but that frequently doors are 
			buried in it to beguile the visitor into going forward and then 
			force him to return into the same winding paths.  
				  
				
				This was the second 
			to be built after the Egyptian Labyrinth, the third being in Lemnos 
			and the fourth in Italy, all roofed with vaults of polished stone, 
			though the Egyptian specimen, to my considerable astonishment, has 
			its entrance and columns made of Parian marble, while the rest is of 
			Aswan granite, such masses being put together as time itself cannot 
			dissolve even with the help of the Heracleopolitans; for they have 
			regarded the building with extraordinary hatred. 
				
				 It would be impossible to describe in detail the layout of that 
			building and its individual parts, since it is divided into regions 
			and administrative districts which are called nomes, each of the 21 
			nomes giving its names to one of the houses. A further reason is the 
			fact that it also contains temples of all the Gods of Egypt while, 
			in addition, Nemesis placed in the building’s 40 chapels many 
			pyramids of 40 ells each covering an area of 6 arourae with their 
			base.  
				  
				
				Men are already weary with traveling when they reach that 
			bewildering maze of paths; indeed, there are also lofty upper rooms 
			reached by ramps and porticoes from which one descends on stairways 
			which have 90 steps each; inside are columns of imperial porphyry, 
			images of the Gods, statues of kings and representations of 
			monsters. Certain of the halls are arranged in such way that as one 
			throws open the door there arises within a fearful noise of thunder; 
			moreover one passes through most of them in darkness. There are 
			again other massive buildings outside the wall of the Labyrinth; 
			they call them “the Wing”.  
				  
				
				Then there are other subterranean 
			chambers made by excavating galleries in the soil. One person only 
			has done any repairs there-and they were few in number. He was Chaermon, the eunuch of king Necthebis, 500 years before Alexander 
			the Great. A tradition is also current that he supported the roofs 
			with beams of acacia wood boiled in oil, until squared stones could 
			be raised up into the vaults.204
				 
			 
			
			204 Pliny (AD 23-79): One passage 
			in his natural history, Book 36, 13. 
			 
			
			We seem to have a bit of a problem here. Notice that 
			Pliny assures 
			us that Herodotus was wrong not only about who built the labyrinth, 
			but also about when it was built. Pliny dates it to almost four 
			thousand years before his own time. He also makes the most 
			interesting remark that the building was regarded with extraordinary 
			hatred. That would certainly be true of a structure that was 
			utilized for dreadful sacrifices.  
			
			  
			
			Pliny mentions the mythical 
			labyrinth of Crete, though it is a certainty that the temple at 
			Knossos that was identified as the labyrinth by Arthur Evans was no 
			longer available for view in the time of Pliny. It seems that Pliny, 
			along with everyone else just took it for granted that the legends 
			of the labyrinth on Crete were the truth. 
			
			 
			So it is that we have found that the earliest known written account 
			of the existence of labyrinths appears in the writings of the Greek 
			historian Herodotus in approximately 450 BC. He describes a great 
			labyrinth located in Egypt at the ancient site of Arsinoe on the 
			eastern bank of a large body of water, Lake Moeris. The labyrinth 
			was constructed in the style of a great compartmental palace with 
			3000 different chambers, 1500 of which were above ground and 1500 
			were below ground.  
			
			  
			
			The foundation was approximately 1000 feet long x 
			800 feet long. He claimed that it was built by Ammenemes III in the 
			twelfth dynasty of the Old Kingdom in approximately 2300 BC. He 
			further said that its primary purpose was for burial, and many kings 
			were buried there. Pliny verified Herodotus’ account in his writings 
			on the four famous labyrinths of antiquity in approximately 50 AD. 
			The remains of the city of Arsinoe have been excavated, but a great 
			labyrinth to the extent of Herodotus’ description has never been 
			found. 
			
			 
			Flinders Petrie did extensive excavation of the city of Arsinoe in 
			1888, but he never discovered the fantastic site that Herodotus 
			described. Petrie found only a great bed of fragments which he 
			believed was the labyrinth. The body of Ammenemes III was supposedly 
			unearthed corroborating Herodotus. A sufficient quantity of the 
			original foundation was unearthed which handily allowed it to be 
			measured at 1000 feet X 800 feet which is exactly the dimension 
			quoted by Herodotus!  
			
			  
			
			That it was definitely a labyrinth could not be 
			determined.  
			
			  
			
			More recently, Egyptologists have decided that the 
			so-called “pyramid of Hawara” is the famous Egyptian labyrinth, but 
			that makes no sense at all. Herodotus, Diodorus, Strabo and 
			Pliny 
			all describe so marvelous a structure that we are hard put to not 
			think that there is truth behind what they were describing. The 
			various propositions for what must be the “remains” of the structure 
			simply do not fit the descriptions. And, while we can have some 
			doubts about the accuracy of the history ascribed to the monument by 
			the various ancient authors, depending on who gave them their 
			information, it’s difficult to doubt that they either saw it 
			themselves, or had direct information. 
			
			 
			Modern experts suggest that “Lake Moeris” is really Lake Qarun, the 
			third largest lake in Egypt, which is located in Faiyyum. If so, we 
			wonder why there are no remains of this labyrinth which Pliny tells 
			us was constructed of,  
			
				
				“Parian marble, while the rest is of Aswan 
			granite, such masses being put together as time itself cannot 
			dissolve even with the help of the Heracleopolitans; for they have 
			regarded the building with extraordinary hatred”. 
			 
			
			Of course, this last may provide a clue: if the building was so 
			hated, it is altogether possible that it was deliberately destroyed, 
			cut to pieces, and carried away block by block. 
			
			 
			The bottom line seems to be that the legend of the labyrinth 
			containing a horrible creature is based on the Egyptian labyrinth. 
			The fact that the Cretans became “experts” in some sort of funerary 
			cult, only created a fertile ground for transferring this legend to 
			Crete. In fact, the Cretans may be closely related to the original 
			Egyptians, the ones who were responsible for the building of the 
			pyramids, the Sphinx, and other techno marvels.  
			
			  
			
			We notice a most 
			peculiar series of events in regard to Egyptian “history”, that may 
			offer some clues: 
			
				
				The generally accepted sequence of Egyptian historical events tells 
			us that a king from “upper Egypt”  -  that is, the arid highlands  -  
			named Narmer, Menes, or Aha, (who may have been separate 
			individuals), defeated the King of Northern, or Lower Egypt, and 
			thereby unified the two lands. This unification is commemorated in 
			the famous Narmer Palette, which shows the ubiquitous “head smiting” 
			scene, a euphemism for conquest. 
				
				 According to Manetho, Menes/Narmer came from the Thinite province in 
			Upper Egypt and, whether unification was achieved by military of 
			peaceful means is uncertain, though head smiting seems to indicate 
			the former. 
				
				 According to tradition, Menes founded Memphis on an island in the 
			Nile, conducted raids against the Nubians, and extended his power as 
			far as the first cataract. He sent ambassadors to Canaan and Byblos 
			in Phoenicia; he founded the city of Crocodilopolis and built the 
			first temple to the God Ptah, who Herodotus and others say was 
				Hephaestus, the volcano/fire God. 
			 
			
			As a sidebar, skipping over the list and details of what is known 
			via archaeology and conjectured via ignorance, we come to the reign 
			of Peribsen in the so-called second dynasty. Peribsen was the fourth 
			king of that line and some experts opine that he was actually not 
			the legitimate heir of Nintejer, the king before him, but that he 
			was an outsider who instigated a coup against Pharaoh Nintejer. 
			Peribsen used the nomen “Seth” in his titles. Apparently, this 
			signified sweeping political changes since the serekhs bearing the 
			royal names are not surmounted by Horus anymore, but by his 
			religious rival, Set, who became the primary royal patron deity of 
			Peribsen. 
			  
			
			Here we discover a most interesting point in history. 
			Peribsen was 
			claiming the title of the rival of Horus. Egyptologists admit that 
			the events of the second dynasty are extremely uncertain, if not the 
			most uncertain in Egyptian history. It just so happens that, right 
			around the time of the Peribsen “rebellion”, the Cretan civilization 
			suddenly appeared in the Mediterranean.  
			
			  
			
			We also note the most 
			curious fact that, based on the years assigned to the kings by Manetho, though we cannot be certain of the year in our own calendar 
			system on which to affix these dates, the period between the 
			unification by Narmer and the Peribsen rebellion happens to be right 
			at 430 years  -  the period of slavery in Egypt claimed by the Jews. 
			It is curious to find this “unification” of Egypt, the building of a 
			great city and temple in Egypt, and a rebellion 430 years later.  
			
			  
			
			As 
			it happens, it was precisely at this moment in time that a new group 
			of people appeared on the island of Crete.  
			
			  
			
			Tacitus tells us: 
			
				
				Some say that the Jews were fugitives from the island of Crete, who 
			settled on the nearest coast of Africa about the time when Saturn 
			was driven from his throne by the power of Jupiter. Evidence of this 
			is sought in the name. There is a famous mountain in Crete called 
			Ida; the neighboring tribe, the Idaei, came to be called Judaei by a 
			barbarous lengthening of the national name.205
				 
			 
			
			205 Herodotus, The Histories, Book V, c. 110 CE 
			
			  
			
			Is this an ancient 
			tradition that was carried to Crete by refugees from Egypt, and 
			then, at the time of the eruption of the volcano Santorini, was 
			carried again to Palestine along with the terrifying images of death 
			and destruction? In the myths of the labyrinth, the most famous of 
			Daedalus’ architectural feats, it is said that King Minos imprisoned 
			him in the labyrinth for helping Theseus escape.  
			
			  
			
			Daedalus and his 
			son escaped by fashioning wings made of feathers and wax, though his 
			son is killed by falling into the sea when the wax melts and the 
			feathers begin to fall out. It was said that Daedalus fled to 
			Sicily. Again we make note of the curious similarity of the story of 
			Minos and his great architect, Daedalus, and Solomon and his great 
			architect Hiram Abiff. We see in the story of Menes/Narmer not 
			merely a strong resemblance, but we see certain historical 
			developments that, even though not specified, point us in the 
			direction of thinking that the myth of Theseus, Ariadne, and 
			Daedalus and the Minotaur in the labyrinth, actually relate to Menes 
			and his labyrinth, and a rebellion 430 years after a “unification” 
			and the building of a labyrinth. 
			
			 
			It is most curious to find this ancient link between Crete and Egypt 
			and the Jews, the purported possessors of the famous Ark of the 
			Covenant, most especially when we consider the issue of the 
			labyrinth and the Minotaur. Was the Labyrinth the real “Temple of 
			Solomon”? We find another clue in the writings of our old gadabout 
			recorder of all gossip, legends, and discombobulated history, 
			Herodotus. Keep in mind that Herodotus was writing down what he was 
			told and what he could get from inquiry.  
			
			  
			
			Indeed, the history had 
			already been “mythicized”, and different kings had been assimilated 
			to the myth according to the pattern discovered by Eliade and 
			friends, so keep that in mind as you read this passage: 
			
				
				Apries having thus been overthrown, Amasis became king, being of the 
			district of Saïs, and the name of the city whence he was is Siuph. 
			Now at the first the Egyptians despised Amasis and held him in no 
			great regard, because he had been a man of the people and was of no 
			distinguished family; but afterwards Amasis won them over to himself 
			by wisdom and not willfulness. 
				
				 First in Saïs he built and completed for Athene a temple-gateway 
			which is a great
			marvel, and he far surpassed herein all who had done the like 
			before, both in regard
			to height and greatness, so large are the stones and of such 
			quality. Then secondly
			he dedicated great colossal statues and man-headed sphinxes very 
			large, and for
			restoration he brought other stones of monstrous size. Some of these 
			he caused to
			be brought from the stone-quarries which are opposite Memphis, 
			others of very great size from the city of Elephantine, distant a 
			voyage of not less than twenty days from Saïs: and of them all I 
			marvel most at this, namely a monolith chamber which he brought from 
			the city of Elephantine; and they were three years engaged in 
			bringing this, and two thousand men were appointed to convey it, who 
			all were of the class of boatmen. 
				
				 Moreover Amasis became a lover of the Hellenes; and besides other 
			proofs of friendship which he gave to several among them, he also 
			granted the city of Naucratis for those of them who came to Egypt to 
			dwell in; and to those who did not desire to stay, but who made 
			voyages thither, he granted portions of land to set up altars and 
			make sacred enclosures for their Gods. 
				
				 Also with the people of Kyrene Amasis made an agreement for 
			friendship and alliance; and he resolved too to marry a wife from 
			thence, whether because he desired to have a wife of Hellenic race, 
			or apart from that, on account of friendship for the people of 
			Kyrene: however that may be, he married, some say the daughter of 
			Battos, others of Arkesilaos, and others of Critobulos, a man of 
			repute among the citizens; and her name was Ladike.206
				 
			 
			
			206 Herodotus, The Histories, Book II, 
			181. 
			 
			
			We are 
			suddenly reminded of the Hyperborean girls who brought offerings to 
			Delos, one of whom was named Laodike.  
			
			  
			
			What is more, it brings to 
			mind the journey of the great Queen of Sheba who heard of the fame 
			of Solomon and came, bearing gifts, to see for herself. 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			The Secret of Crete 
			
			 
			For centuries, bards in the marketplaces of the Mediterranean 
			recited the stories of the Minotaur. Scholars of later centuries 
			considered them to be fable and fantasy. The ideas of human 
			sacrifice and grotesque creatures were reinterpreted as symbolic 
			accounts of how higher Greek culture overcame the bloody bull cult 
			of the ancient Cretans. And so the matter was interpreted until 
			Arthur Evans discovered and excavated the “palace” at Knossos, a few 
			miles south of the capital of Crete, Herakleion. (We note that Pliny 
			mentions residents of an Egyptian city Heracleopolis.) 
			
			 
			Nevertheless, Arthur Evans banished the myth of the Minotaur with 
			his discovery. From the remains of twelve hundred deviously 
			interconnected rooms, stairways, corridors, warehouses, colonnaded 
			halls and cellars grouped around an interior court, and from the 
			arrangements of wall paintings showing bull games, animal scenes, 
			processions and portraits, Evans reconstructed the Minoan culture 
			for the breathless world. Based upon Evan’s analyses, the Greek 
			bards who said such nasty things about the Cretans were all a bunch 
			of frauds!  
			
			  
			
			The innumerable battles between Theseus and the 
			Minotaur portrayed on classical vases, murals, mosaics, reliefs, 
			gems, and coins, were obviously based on pure imagination. There 
			were, of course, some criticisms of Evans’ reconstruction, but by 
			and large, no one really doubted that the excavated labyrinth at 
			Knossos was, indeed, the home of the Cretan royal family  -  a palace. 
			Not only that, but the world of Arthur Evans’ time was amazed at the 
			high culture of the Minoans. They had drainage systems, bathrooms, 
			frescoes of women in striking toilettes that were actually similar 
			to the styles at the time of the discovery  -  bared breasts and long 
			skirts.  
			
			  
			
			The women of Knossos wore make-up and lived in country 
			estates that were undefended  -  a sign of gracious living  -  as 
			opposed to the gloomy citadels of the later Greeks. Clearly the 
			Minoans lived in a land flowing with milk and honey and lived a 
			carefree life devoted to sports, art, and love in the sunny kingdom 
			of Minos, a veritable Solomon with his genius architect, Daedalus. 
			
			 
			There was only one serious dissenter to the universal acceptance of 
			the gay lifestyle of those amazing Minoans: Oswald Spengler.  
			
			  
			
			In his 
			book World History of the Second Millennium BC, published in 1935, Spengler speculated on the archaeological finds of Crete. He noted 
			the absence of any protecting walls around ancient Cretan palaces 
			and country estates; he noted the pictures of bulls so reminiscent 
			of the ancient Minotaur legend; he noted a very peculiar “king’s 
			throne” in the Palace of Knossos, which in his view, would have been 
			more suitable “for a votive image of a priest’s mummy”.  
			
			  
			
			And then he 
			asked, 
			
				
				“were the ‘palaces’ of Knossos and Phaistos temples of the 
			dead, sanctuaries of a powerful cult of the hereafter? I do not wish 
			to make such an assertion, for I cannot prove it, but the question 
			seems to me worthy of serious consideration”. 
			 
			
			But such a suggestion was ignored. 
			
			 
			According to the experts, the position of Crete was particularly 
			favorable for the purported Minoan domination of the sea, and for 
			growth and development of their wonderful civilization. It was 
			claimed to be the “crossroads”, linking three continents, and all 
			the racial and cultural elements of Europe, Asia and Africa met and 
			mingled in the melting pot of Crete. It was this mingling that 
			produced such a marvelous new way of life, a new philosophy, new 
			art, and the “freshness, charm and variety” that enchanted the 
			world. 
			
			 
			The Minoan Kingdom was destroyed by the eruption of the terrible 
			volcano of Santorini, which we will discuss further on in some 
			detail, and after that, none of the Minoan “palaces” was ever 
			re-inhabited. It seems that the original Minoans fled, never to 
			return, and afterward, the purely Greek period of Crete began with 
			the arrival of waves of Dorians. 
			
			 
			According to Homer, Idomensus, grandson of the ruler of Knossos, 
			fought side by side with the Achaeans against the Trojans. In the 
			famous catalogue of ships in The Iliad, the Cretans are listed along 
			with the rest of the Achaeans and not as foreign auxiliaries. There 
			is absolutely no indication that the Cretans are anything other than Danaans, which means Achaeans or Greeks.  
			
			  
			
			Before the discoveries of 
			Arthur Evans, there was no indication that the Minoans had not been 
			Greeks. But after his excavations, such an idea could no longer hold 
			sway. They were clearly not Greeks.  
			
			  
			
			The question in the minds of 
			everyone is: who were these Minoans, really, and where did they go? 
			
			  
			
			From the very beginning of his excavations, the finds at Knossos 
			differed so fundamentally from the art and artifacts of classical 
			Greece that there was simply no comparison. The russet skin color of 
			the Minoan men on the frescoes in the Palace of Knossos was a 
			distinct sign of their alien nature to the Greeks. They were not 
			fair-haired Achaeans, but brown skinned, dark-haired tribes. Evans 
			found no temples, no large sculpture, no amphitheaters with seats, 
			and no inscriptions telling the deeds of the Gods and great men, not 
			even any familiar characters of the Greek pantheons. 
			
			 
			Instead, Evans found strange columns that tapered toward the bottom, 
			and architecture like no other in its shapes and arrangement of 
			space. He found magazines full of gigantic jars  -  pithoi  -  deposits 
			of clay tablets of endless statistical notations devoid of any 
			historical character or mythological references. He found curious 
			clay idols of women with bared breasts holding serpents. The 
			resemblances to finds at Mycenae and Tiryns in the Peloponnesus have 
			prompted some experts to think that the lords of the citadels of 
			Mycenae and Tiryns had visited Crete. The frescoes of women in 
			Tiryns, with long black hair, exposed bosoms and slender waists; the 
			dolphins, lotus blossoms and spiral motifs; and especially the 
			characteristic Cretan double shields plainly showed the hand of a 
			Cretan artist. 
			
			 
			Knossos presented no clear parallel to other known cultures of the 
			eastern Mediterranean. The Minoans were something quite “other”. The 
			only possible comparison in terms of elegance of lifestyle was 
			either Greece or Egypt. But the people who lived at Knossos were 
			quite different from either of them. Knossos had no mummies, no 
			pyramids, no sphinxes or obelisks, no monumental statues of Gods or 
			pharaohs, no walls filled with hieroglyphs glorifying their rulers 
			and their deeds. 
			
			 
			Arthur Evans thought that something must have prevented a complete 
			cultural and civilizational exchange. He came to believe that the 
			inhabitants of Knossos had attained a height of civilization unique 
			for the Middle to Late Bronze Age, with technical devices at their 
			disposal that seemed strikingly modern. Again the question was 
			asked: who were they and where did they go? What happened to the 
			Minoans? 
			
			 
			In 1974, Hans Georg Wunderlich, Professor of Geology and 
			Paleontology at Stuttgart University, published The Secret of Crete. 
			This book was the result of many observations he had made from a 
			“geologists” point of view while visiting Crete. There were many 
			puzzling facts about the strange 1200 room “palace”.  
			
			  
			
			One thing his 
			geologist’s eye noticed immediately was that the steps of the 
			“palace” were made of soft alabaster, but were not worn! There were 
			many doorways, but stone slabs sealed them off. There were 
			“bathtubs” equipped with drain holes, but no drainpipes! He found 
			row after row of storage vessels, but no kitchen. The list goes on, 
			and the reader is encouraged to read his book for the lengthy 
			analysis. 
			
			 
			Wunderlich quotes the account of traveller Thomas Munster in Crete: 
			
				
				What about the palace’s access to light, air and sun? Where, for 
			example, are the big windows without which we can scarcely imagine 
			elegant living? When you look closer you see, to be sure, that the 
			royal palace has open loggias, colonnaded halls, roofed over courts, 
			but that there are scarcely any windows.  
				  
				
				A good many rooms are so 
			completely boxed in within the complex structure that they do not even border on an outside wall. 
			There is something very odd about the idea of constructing a 
			luxurious building in whose interior people would necessarily feel 
			as if they were inside a cave. Yet they had the means to build in 
			totally modern windows, perhaps even glazed windows. 
				
				 In a state of devastation the place must have looked like a tangle 
			of artificial caves in which nobody could find his way about… and 
			the impression of mystery, vastness and confusion must have been 
			complete. 
				
				 No materials were carried away from Knossos to be used for peasant 
			villages… The place was avoided with superstitious fear. What 
			exactly happened, why Knossos was avoided like the site of a gallows 
			or a witches’ dancing floor, remains to be clarified.207
				 
			 
			
			207 Munster, quoted 
			by Wunderlich, The Secret of Crete, (New York: Macmillan 1974) p. 
			85.  
			
			  
			
			In the end, Wunderlich came to the realization, based on the objective evidence, 
			that the “palace” of King Minos, so identified by Evans, was nothing 
			but a necropolis. It had never been intended for the living, but was 
			a place where a powerful cult of the dead practiced elaborate 
			sacrifices, burial rites, and ritual games of death.  
			
			  
			
			He realized 
			that the legend of Crete was essentially accurate, and that legend 
			said that it was not a “home to a wise sovereign who fostered arts 
			and sports”, but that it was a sinister place belonging entirely to 
			the underworld and a devouring God. In other words, it had the 
			equivalent reputation among the civilizations of the Mediterranean 
			that a graveyard and mausoleum have in our own society. Just as our 
			society has a tendency to tell “ghost stories around the campfire”, 
			about terrifying apparitions of the dead in our own cemeteries, or 
			“cities of the dead”, so were similar tales told about Crete, where 
			the only living inhabitants were the “resident undertakers”, the 
			“embalmers”, and experts on death and the afterlife.  
			
			  
			
			Crete didn’t 
			need defensive walls because it was the place that the other cities 
			and countries brought their dead for “cult care”. It may also have 
			been the site of human sacrifice for cult reasons as well.  
			
			  
			
			Wunderlich wrote his own observations: 
			
				
				I had visited the Minoan sites to explore the traces of early 
			geological catastrophes, but what I found were curious 
			contradictions. Were the excavated labyrinthine complexes really the 
			palatial residences of glorious kings, of the legendary Minos and 
			his brothers Sarpedon and Rhadamanthys? In fact, could these places 
			be regarded as residences at all? 
				 
				
				  
				
				My geological observations argued 
			against any such assumption. Places of worship, shrines, sanctified 
			earth, yes, but not places of human settlement. Comparison with 
			other Mediterranean cultures suggested a cult of the dead […] that 
			would mean, however, that Minoan culture, to the extent that we now 
			know it, was almost entirely a funerary cult.208
				 
			 
			
			208 Ibid. 
			 
			In dealing with the issue of what happened to the Minoans, 
			Wunderlich points out that it is a mistake to think that just 
			because an institution comes to an end, and the buildings of a 
			civilization are destroyed, that it means an end to the peoples 
			themselves. Institutions end when they no longer have a “living 
			function”. In light of the major destruction of the area by the 
			cataclysmic eruption of Santorini, it is far more likely, as 
			Wunderlich points out, that there was a “change in function”, and an 
			“abandonment of traditional ideas and modes of behavior”.  
			
			  
			
			In other 
			words, if a funerary cult is destroyed cataclysmically, it is 
			entirely likely that the practitioners came to the conclusion that 
			they needed a change of philosophy and were “born again” into a new 
			and different cult that was considered to be less likely to evoke 
			such disastrous responses from the “Gods”. And, in point of fact, 
			that seems to be what happened. 
			
			 
			Given all the evidence presented by Wunderlich, we can no longer 
			think of Crete as an anomaly, an isolated civilization in the 
			Mediterranean. Rather, we come to the rather startling realization 
			that Crete did have an enormous role in the context of those times. 
			Many connections are drawn between the Minoans and Etruria, 
			Mesopotamia, Egypt and Greece.  
			
			  
			
			More than this, Wunderlich marshals a 
			great body of evidence to show that the Cretan civilization was born 
			from Egypt and interacted with Egypt in a long relationship. 
			
				
				The Minoans were a dark, elegant people of mysterious origin. Even 
			their ancient name is unknown; they were given the name Minoans by a 
			modern-day British archaeologist, Arthur Evans, who derived it from 
			Greek mythology. [...]209 About 3200 BC, a large number of newcomers 
			reached southern Crete. Their religious symbols  -  the trident, the 
			double axe, and the shield shaped like the numeral 8  -  were those of 
			the Delta tribes of Lower Egypt.  
				  
				
				The Libyan Goddess, with her spear, 
			snake, spindle, and goatskin bib, came with them, and she remained 
			one of their chief deities. Other evidence of the newcomers’ 
			Egyptian or Libyan origin was the soldiers’ custom of training their 
			hair in a long lock curled over one shoulder and their use of a 
			peculiarly shaped loincloth instead of a kilt. It seems likely that 
			these people may have been fleeing from Menes‘ conquest of Lower 
			Egypt. They mixed with the Neolithic Cretans of the mountains to 
			form the Cretan civilization.210
				 
			 
			
			209 Colon, Thuborn, The 
			Ancient Mariners, (Alexandria, Virginia: Time-Life Books 1981) p. 
			12.  
			
			210 Hayes, pp. 73-74. 
			
			  
			
			Returning to our tracking of the 
			story of the labyrinth, the hero of the story, Prince Theseus of 
			Athens, volunteered to become one of the intended victims. 
			
			  
			
			However, 
			the priestess Ariadne fell in love with him and helped him by giving 
			him a ball of golden thread. He unraveled this as he penetrated to 
			the heart of the maze, where he slew the Minotaur and was able to 
			find his way out and escape.  
			
			  
			
			Afterwards, Theseus sailed away from 
			Crete with Ariadne and the other Athenian youths and maidens who had been 
			held captive in the labyrinth, and arrived at Delos. There he set up 
			a shrine to Aphrodite, and he and his companions executed a dance 
			which imitated the winding twists and turns of the labyrinth, which 
			included weaving, turning movements to complex rhythms. It is known 
			that locals performed a version of this dance until fairly recent 
			times. 
			
			 
			This connection of the myth of Theseus and Ariadne to the island of 
			Delos brings us again back to the mysterious offerings that were 
			sent from the Hyperboreans to the Delians, and the story of the four 
			Hyperborean girls who never returned to their country, Hyperoche and 
			Laodike, Opis and Arge, accompanied by five men who Herodotus tells 
			us were later called “Perphereës”. We see here a connection to the 
			myth of the Athenian youths and maidens sent as tribute to Minos. We 
			also see a connection to several other myths that all seem to be 
			different versions of the same story that has received various 
			treatments according to the “mythicization” principle. We are 
			interested in the common elements so as to be able to determine the 
			core event. 
			
			 
			The majority of experts who write about the labyrinth, tell us that 
			the plan and meaning of the maze clearly originated in Egypt, where 
			it was the scene of the religious dramas involving killing the 
			God-king in the form of a bull. They further tell us that the 
			sacrifice was only token, and that a divine bull was substituted for 
			the king in the culmination of several days of ritual dance, drama 
			and combat performed in a labyrinth. A similar cult is said to be at 
			the root of the Cretan labyrinth myth. The “bull of Minos” would be 
			the representative of the kingship and power of Minos; and Theseus, 
			by killing the bull and taking the king’s daughter, was claiming the 
			throne symbolically. 
			
			 
			Indeed, such a solution would explain why bull, king and labyrinth 
			occur together in both Crete and Egypt, but what it does not explain 
			is the labyrinth itself and why the same design is found all over 
			the world. Most scholars of ancient history and archaeology are 
			powerfully influenced by the theories of Egyptology which posit that 
			all civilizations diffused from ancient Egypt, or from Mesopotamia, 
			at least. However, the sheer volume of physical evidence suggests 
			that this is not the case. 
			
			 
			The Egyptian labyrinths were always composed of straight lines, and 
			the
			abstract mazes on seals were usually made up of square fret 
			patterns. While Cretan
			coins from classical times often show labyrinths, some of which are 
			of the
			Egyptian fretwork kind, most of them show a maze of a very different 
			construction
			- the square or rounded spiral design  -  the Greek meander  -  of 
			European tradition, which is never found in Egypt. 
			
			 
			The spiraling maze consists of a series of interlocking concentric 
			bands, usually seven in number, with a straight line of exit running 
			from the center to the base. This is the form of nearly all the 
			ancient mazes of Europe, including those known to have been focal 
			points of nature religions and folk activity such as festivals, 
			dancing, dramas and games.  
			
			  
			
			These designs are known as Troy towns. 
			Spiral mazes with names that are obviously derived from the word 
			“Troy” are found in Wales, Scotland, Ireland, England, Italy, 
			Germany, Sweden, Norway and Russia. In short, there is absolutely 
			nothing Egyptian about the Troy mazes, and there is every reason to 
			believe that they are indigenous to the megalithic cultures, which 
			were independent developments from the civilizations of the Near 
			East. 
			 
			But in the stories of the Hyperborean girls, the myths of Theseus, 
			as well as several other myths we are going to examine, we find two 
			independent aspects of the maze puzzle meeting and interacting, and 
			what they have in common is, in our opinion, ancient technology  -  a 
			device that may have been at the center of the dance of the God at 
			Stonehenge, utilized to manipulate gravity, space and time.  
			
			  
			
			That 
			similar powers were available to the Egyptians seems to be evident, 
			but it is also clear that their perception of the world, their 
			reaction to it, and their utilization of this technology was quite 
			different. 
			
			 
			In the stories of the Egyptian labyrinth, the object at the center 
			was a terrible, devouring power. In the story of the Hyperboreans, 
			the dance of the God was a celebration of life, of bounty, of 
			victory over the serpent. The “spear-armed Maruts” danced and 
			brought forth baskets of bountiful blessings, materializing from the 
			waves of the great Star Goddess, the Enthroned Queen.  
			
			  
			
			Something 
			happened. Something terrible, and whether or not we discover that 
			any sort of “object” was at the center of the labyrinth, we believe 
			that our investigations will lead us to the knowledge of the Ark.  
			
			  
			
			And so far, even if it left Egypt, it does not seem to have made it 
			to Crete. 
			
			  
			
			
			Back to Contents 
			
			  
			
			
			
			Back to Ancient and Modern Megaliths 
			
			  
			
			
			Previous   
			Next 
			
			   |