Do higher dimensions exist? Are there unseen worlds just beyond our reach, beyond the normal laws of physics?
Although higher dimensions have
historically been the exclusive realm of charlatans, mystics, and
science fiction writers, many serious theoretical physicists now
believe that higher dimensions not only exist, but may also explain
some of the deepest secrets of nature. Although we stress that there
is at present no experimental evidence for higher dimensions, in
principle they may solve the ultimate problem in physics: the final
unification of all physical knowledge at the fundamental level.
Spending their entire lives at the bottom of the pond, the carp would believe that their “universe” consisted of the water and the lilies; they would only be dimly aware that an alien world could exist just above the surface. My world was beyond their comprehension. I was intrigued that I could sit only a few inches from the carp, yet we were separated by an immense chasm. I concluded that if there were any “scientists” among the carp, they would scoff at any fish who proposed that a parallel world could exist just above the lilies.
An unseen world beyond the pond made no scientific sense. Once I imagined what would happen if I reached down and suddenly grabbed one of the carp “scientists” out of the pond. I wondered, how would this appear to the carp? The startled carp “scientist” would tell a truly amazing story, being somehow lifted out of the universe (the pond) and hurled into a mysterious nether world, another dimension with blinding lights and strangeshaped objects that no carp had ever seen before.
The strangest of all was the massive creature responsible for this outrage, who did not resemble a fish in the slightest. Shockingly, it had no fins whatsoever, but nevertheless could move without them.
Obviously, the familiar laws of physics
no longer applied in this nether world!
To describe our physical world, with its almost infinite variety of forms, requires entire libraries overflowing with mountains of technical journals and stacks of obscure, learned books. The ultimate goal of physics, some believe, is to have a single equation or expression from which this colossal volume of information can be derived from first principles. Today, many physicists believe that we have found the “unified field theory” which eluded Einstein for the last thirty years of his life.
Although the theory of higher dimensional space has not been verified (and, we shall see, would be prohibitively expensive to prove experimentally), almost 5,000 papers, at last count, have been published in the physics literature concerning higher dimensional theories, beginning with the pioneering papers of Theodore Kaluza and Oskar Klein in the 1920's and 30s, to the supergravity theory of the 1970s, and finally to the superstring theory of the 1980s and 90s.
In fact, the
superstring theory, which
postulates that matter consists of tiny strings vibrating in
hyperspace, predicts the precise number of dimensions of space and
time: 10.
It takes two numbers to locate your
position on a map, and one number to specify the distance above the
map. It thus takes three numbers to specify the location of your
lunch. (If we meet our friends at noon, then it takes four numbers
to specify the space and time of the meeting.)
(The reason for this unfortunate
accident has to do with biology, rather than physics. Human
evolution put a premium on being able to visualize objects moving in
three dimensions. There was a selection pressure placed on humans
who could dodge lunging saber tooth tigers or hurl a spear at a
charging mammoth. Since tigers do not attack us in the fourth
spatial dimension, there simply was no advantage in developing a
brain with the ability to visualize objects moving in four
dimensions.)
If one of the Flatlanders becomes lost, we can quickly scan all of Flatland, peering directly inside houses, buildings, and even concealed places. If one of the Flatlanders becomes sick, we can reach directly into their insides and per form surgery, without ever cutting their skin.
If one of the Flatlanders is incarcerated in jail (which is a circle enclosing the Flatlander) we can simply peel the person off from Flatland into the third dimension and place the Flatlander back somewhere else. If we become more ambitious and stick our fingers and arms through Flatland, the Flatlanders would only see circles of flesh that hover around them, constantly changing shape and merging into other circles.
And lastly, if we fling a Flatlander into our three dimensional world, the Flatlander can only see two dimensional cross sections of our world, i.e. a phantasmagoria of circles, squares, etc. which constantly change shape and merge.
Now imagine that we are “three dimensional Flatlanders” being visited by a higher dimensional being.
If we became lost, a higher dimensional being could scan our entire universe all at once, peering directly into the most tightly sealed hiding places. If we became sick, a higher dimensional being could reach into our insides and perform surgery without ever cutting our skin. If we were in a maximumsecurity, escapeproof jail, a higher dimensional being could simply “yank” us into a higher dimension and redeposit us back somewhere else.
If higher dimensional beings stick their “fingers” into our universe, they would appear to us to be blobs of flesh which float above us and constantly merge and split apart. And lastly, if we are flung into hyperspace, we would see a collection of spheres, blobs, and polyhedra which suddenly appear, constantly change shape and color, and then mysteriously disappear. Higher dimensional people, therefore, would have powers similar to a god: they could walk through walls, disappear and reappear at will, reach into the strongest steel vaults, and see through buildings.
They would be omniscient and omnipotent.
Not surprisingly, speculation about
higher dimensions has sparked enormous literary and artistic
interest over the last hundred years.
In H. G. Wells' The Invisible Man, the source of invisibility
was his ability to manipulate the fourth dimension. Oscar Wilde even
refers to the fourth dimension in his play The Canterville Ghost as
the homeworld for ghosts.
Lenin even waged a polemic on the Nth
dimension with philosopher Ernst Mach in his Materialism and EmpirioCriticism.
Lenin praised Mach, who “has raised the very important and useful
question of a space of ndimensions as a conceivable space,” but
then took him to task by insisting that the Tsar could only be
overthrown in the third dimension.
Sweeping landscapes and realistic, three dimensional people were painted from the point of view of a person's eye, with the lines of perspective vanishing into the horizon. Renaissance art reflected the way the human eye viewed the world, from the singular point of view of the observer. In other words, Renaissance art discovered the third dimension. With the beginning of the machine age and capitalism, the artistic world revolted against the cold materialism that seemed to dominate industrial society.
To the Cubists, positivism was a straitjacket that confined us to what could be measured in the laboratory, suppressing the fruits of our imagination.
They asked: Why must art be clinically “realistic?”
This Cubist “revolt against perspective” seized the fourth dimension because it touched the third dimension from all possible perspectives. Simply put, Cubist art embraced the fourth dimension.
Picasso's paintings are a splendid example, showing a clear rejection of three dimensional perspective, with women's faces viewed simultaneously from several angles. Instead of a single pointofview, Picasso's paintings show multiple perspectives, as if they were painted by a being from the fourth dimension, able to see all perspectives simultaneously.
As art historian Linda Henderson has written,
But to understand how adding higher dimensions can, in fact, simplify physical problems, consider the following example. To the ancient Egyptians, the weather was a complete mystery. What caused the seasons? Why did it get warmer as they traveled south?
The weather was impossible to explain
from the limited vantage point of the ancient Egyptians, to whom the
earth appeared flat, like a twodimensional plane.
Facts that were impossible to understand
in a flat world suddenly become obvious when viewing a unified
picture of a three dimensional earth.
The culmination of 2,000 years of painstaking observation is the realization that that our universe is governed by four fundamental forces. These four forces, in turn, may be unified in higher dimensional space.
Light, for example, may be viewed simply as vibrations in the fifth dimension.
The other forces of nature may be viewed as vibrations in increasingly higher dimensions. At first glance, however, the four fundamental forces seem to bear no resemblance to each other.
They are:
Historically, whenever scientists unraveled the secrets of one of the four fundamental forces, this irrevocably altered the course of modern civilization, from the mastery of mechanics and Newtonian physics in the 1700s, to the harnessing of the electromagnetism in the 1800s, and finally to the unlocking of the nuclear force in the 1900s.
In some sense, some of the greatest breakthroughs in the history of science can be traced back to the gradual understanding of these four fundamental forces. Some have even claimed that the progress of the last 2,000 years of science can be understood as the successive mastery of these four fundamental forces. Given the importance of these four fundamental forces, the next question is: can they be united into one super force? Are they but the manifestations of a deeper reality?
Given the fruitless search that has stumped the world's Nobel Prize winners for half a century, most physicists agree that the Theory of Everything must be a radical departure from everything that has been tried before. For example, Niels Bohr, founder of the modern atomic theory, once listened to Wolfgang Pauli's explanation of his version of the unified field theory.
In frustration, Bohr finally stood up and said,
Today, however, after decades of false starts and frustrating dead ends, many of the world's leading physicists think that they have finally found the theory “crazy enough” to be the unified field theory.
There is widespread belief (although
certainly not unanimous by any means) in the world's major re search
laboratories that we have at last found the Theory of Everything.
For example, the magnetic field of a bar magnet resembles a spider's web which fills up all of space. To describe the magnetic field, we introduce the field, a series of numbers defined at each point in space which describes the intensity and direction of the force at that point.
James Clerk Maxwell, in the last
century, proved that the electromagnetic force can be described by
four numbers at each point in four dimensional spacetime (labeled
by A _ 1, A _ 2 , A _ 3 , A _ 4 ). These four numbers, in turn, obey
a set of equations (called Maxwell's field equations).
The key idea of Theodore Kaluza in the 1920s was to write down a five dimensional theory of gravity.
In five dimensions, the gravitational field has 15 independent numbers, which can be arranged in a five dimensional array (see fig.4). Kaluza then redefined the 5th column and row of the gravitation al field to be the electromagnetic field of Maxwell.
The truly miraculous feature of this construction is
that the five dimensional theory of gravity reduces down precisely
to Einstein's original theory of gravity plus Maxwell's theory of
light. In other words, by adding the fifth dimension, we have
trivially unified light with gravity. In other words, light is now
viewed as vibrations in the fifth dimension. In five dimensions,
there is “enough room” to unify both gravity and light.
Simply put, by adding more dimensions, we are able to describe more forces. Similarly, by adding higher dimensions and further embellishing this approach (with something called “supersymmetry), we can explain the entire particle “zoo” that has been discovered over the past thirty years, with bizarre names like quarks, neutrinos, muons, gluons, etc.
Although the mathematics required to extend the idea of Kaluza has reached truly breathtaking heights, startling even professional mathematicians, the basic idea behind unification remains surprisingly simple:
What Happened Before the Big Bang?
The 10 dimensional superstring theory, for example, gives us a compelling explanation of the origin of the Big Bang, the cosmic explosion which took place 15 to 20 billion years ago, which sent the stars and galaxies hurling in all directions. In this theory, the universe originally started as a perfect 10 dimensional universe with nothing in it.
In the beginning, the universe was completely empty.
However, this 10 dimensional universe was not stable. The original 10 dimensional spacetime finally “cracked” into two pieces, a four and a six dimensional universe. The universe made the “quantum leap” to another universe in which six of the 10 dimensions collapsed and curled up into a tiny ball, allowing the remaining four dimensional universe to explode outward at an enormous rate.
The four dimensional universe (our
world) expanded rapidly, creating the Big Bang, while the six
dimensional universe wrapped itself into a tiny ball and shrunk down
to infinitesimal size. This explains the origin of the Big Bang. The
current expansion of the universe, which we can measure with our
instruments, is a rather minor aftershock of a more cataclysmic
collapse: the breaking of a 10 dimensional universe into a four and
six dimensional universe.
(This will be disappointing to those who would like to visit these higher dimensions in their lifetimes. These higher dimensions are much too small to enter.)
According to Einstein's theory of gravity, spacetime can be visualized as a fabric which is stretched and distorted by the presence of matter and energy. The gravitational field of a black hole, for example, can be visualized as a funnel, with a dead, collapsed star at the very center (see fig. 6). Anyone unfortunate enough to get too close to the funnel inexorably falls into it and is crushed to death.
One puzzle, however, is that, according to Einstein's equations, the funnel of a black hole necessarily connects our universe with a parallel universe.
Furthermore, if the funnel connects our
universe with itself, then we have a “worm hole” (see fig. 7). These
anomalies did not bother Einstein because it was thought that travel
through the neck of the funnel, called the “EinsteinRosen bridge,”
would be impossible (since anyone falling into the black hole would
be killed).
Thorne even gives a crude idea of what a time machine might look like when built. (Imagine, however, the chaos that could erupt if time machines were as common as cars. History books could never be written. Thousands of meddlers would constantly be going back in time to eliminate the ancestors of their enemies, to change the outcome of World War I and II, to save John Kennedy's and Abraham Lincoln's life, etc.
“History” as we know it would become impossible, throwing professional historians out of work.
With every turn of a time machine's
dial, history would be changing like sands being blown by the wind.)
Other physicists, however, like Steven Hawking, are dubious about
time travel. They argue that quantum effects (such as intense
radiation fields at the funnel) may close the
EinsteinRosen bridge.
Hawking even advanced an experimental “proof” that time machines are
not possible (i.e. if they existed, we would have been visited by
tourists from the future).
But to calculate if these quantum corrections are intense enough to close the EinsteinRosen bridge, one necessarily needs a unified field theory which includes both Einstein's theory of gravity as well as the quantum theory of radiation. So there is hope that soon these questions may be answered once and for all by a unified field theory.
Both sides of the controversy over time
travel acknowledge that ultimately this question will be resolved by
the
Theory of Everything.
The energy at which the four fundamental forces merge into a single, unified force occurs at the fabulous “Planck energy,” which is a billion billion times greater than the energy found in a proton.
Even if all the nations of the earth were to band together and singlemindedly build the biggest atom smasher in all history, it would still not be enough to test the theory. Because of this, some physicists have scoffed at the idea that superstring theory can even be considered a legitimate “theory.” Nobel laureate Sheldon Glashow, for example, has compared the superstring theory to the former Pres. Reagan's Star Wars program (because it is untestable and drains the best scientific talent).
The reason why the theory cannot be tested is rather simple. The Theory of Everything is necessarily a theory of Creation, that is, it must explain everything from the origin of the Big Bang down to the lilies of the field. Its full power is manifested at the instant of the Big Bang, where all its symmetries were intact. To test this theory, therefore, means recreating Creation on the earth, which is impossible with presentday technology.
(This criticism applies, in fact, to any
theory of Creation. The philosopher David Hume, for example,
believed that a scientific theory of Creation was philosophically
impossible. This was because the foundation of science depends on
reproducibility, and Creation is one event which can never be
reproduced in the laboratory.)
That is why it is sometimes called a “window on Creation.”
Costing 810 billion, the SSC consists of a ring of powerful magnets stretched out in a tube over 50 miles long. In fact, one could easily fit the Washington Beltway, which surrounds Washington D.C., inside the SSC. If and when it is built, physicists hope that the SSC will find some exotic subatomic particles in order to complete our presentday understanding of the four forces.
However, there is also the small chance that physicists might discover “super symmetric” particles, which may be remnants of the original superstring theory.
In other words, although the superstring theory cannot be tested directly by the SSC, one hopes to find resonances from the superstring theory among the debris created by smashing protons together at energies not found since the Big Bang.
