| 
			  
			  
			  
			 
			by Bruce L. Cathie 
			
			Spanish 
			version 
			extracted from
			
			The Energy Grid - Harmonic 695 
			  
			  
			  
			 IN 1961 ARCHAEOLOGISTS DIGGING AT THE PALATINE Hill, Rome, 
			uncovered a previously unknown room. In a niche of this room there 
			was a painting, the subject of which was so startling that no 
			explanation satisfactory to all shades of belief has yet been 
			offered.  
			 The painting?
 
			 In the centre ground stands what appears to be a modern spacecraft, 
			a rocket in fact. It stands on a launching pad, and from it runs 
			cables or guys; in the background there is a tall wall—for all the 
			world resembling a counterblast wall.
 
			  
			 Asks Ivan T. Sanderson, former 
			British naval intelligence officer and a distinguished biologist:
			 
				
				What was it that the Roman artist painted? Was it imagination? 
			Reality? A forecast of the future?’ A reproduction of the painting 
			appears in his book, Uninvited Visitors. It deserves careful 
				scrutiny.  
				  
				Why a painting of a rocket ship should appear on the wall 
			of a hidden room dating from ancient times - how it could possibly 
			be there (yet it is!) - could be anyone’s guess.  
				  
				Yet, curiously 
			enough, there may be many more links between places of worship and 
			space travel than one might first dare to think.  
			This is not intended as an irreverent statement; there need be no 
			offence taken by anything written in this chapter by readers of 
			devout Christian or other beliefs. But we would like to present some 
			facts and some theories that might tend to open up fascinating lines 
			of investigation for serious research work.  
			 Consider, first of all, a typical place of worship in any country of
			the world today; and reflect that religious architecture has 
			virtually 
			followed a specific pattern from ages past. Mathematically speaking
			architecture of the kind displayed by the great cathedrals of 
			Europe, 
			for example, would present the greatest possible challenge to the
			designers and the builders of the time, with the great naves, the
			lowering structures, the superb arches.
 
			  
			 Chartres, dating from the
			twelfth century, said by some to represent the finest flowering of
			religious architecture, is believed to have been designed on principles of Platonic mathematics, in which the harmonies of the entire
			universe were to be expressed.  
			  
			Gaze upon the faces of the finely
			sculptured kings and queens at Chartres, unidentified and unknown
			representations; with expressions of supreme nobility they look down 
			upon the thousands of tourists who come each year.  
			  
			Look at the twin 
			spires of the mighty cathedral - and mentally compare their shape 
			and proportions with those of Apollo 12.  
			  
			Look at any Christian 
			church with new eyes, and see the resemblance between the typical 
			church spire and a typical rocket ship. Study pictures of Islamic 
			mosques, oriental pagodas, Buddhist temples; places of worship in 
			India, Thailand, the Middle East: see how their towers soar upward, 
			towards where most people believe “heaven” to be located.  
			  
			Allowing 
			for differences between Occident and Orient in the interpretation of 
			detail, attempt to get a mental X-ray picture of the basic tower 
			structures - and see how alike they really are beneath the 
			superficial additions of various forms of buttresses, decorations of 
			gargoyles or carved relief.  
			 Moscow’s Ivan the Great bell tower in the Kremlin, seen with 
			newly-opened eyes, is a three-stage rocket topped with a 
			semi-spherical capsule; the multi-stage rockets disguised as towers 
			surrounding St. Sophia’s, Constantinople, are suddenly obvious; the 
			beautiful gothic arches inside Cologne Cathedral repeat the rocket 
			shape; 
			Chinese pagodas, Indian temples and stupas, Armenian bell towers, 
			and simple country churches anywhere in the Christian world - all 
			suddenly appear to have been built expressly in imitation of 
			spaceships.
 
			 But granted the coincidence of shape - why?
 
			  
			 That is a question that 
			Vyacheslav Zaitsev, philologist at the Byelorrussian Academy of 
			Sciences, has sought to answer in a number of works (Cosmic 
			Reminiscences in Written Relics of the Past; The Evolution of the 
			Universe and Intelligent Beings; plus many magazine articles, 
			condensations of some of these appearing from time to time in 
			
			the 
			magazine Sputnik).  
			  
			  
				 
				from 'The Occult 
				Connection' By Ken Hudnall 
			  
			  
			 But this field of research was not opened up by Zaitsev; he gives credit to 
			Nikolai Rynin, a friend and pupil of 
			Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, the Russian scientist who at the beginning 
			of this century established principles for the building of space 
			rockets.  
			 More than forty years ago Rynin was drawing attention to the 
			correspondences in the myths of various peoples in regard to earth 
			visits by beings from other worlds. In 1959 another Russian 
			scientist, Modest Agrest, considered that many events described in
			the Bible were in fact references to visits made to this planet by astronauts from other worlds.
 
			  
			 Three years later the American 
			astrophysicist, 
			Carl Sagan, published a similar hypothesis. 
 Let us be clear about this, there is no scientific backing for the 
			theory that has been put forward and which we now draw attention to 
			that the resemblance between religious architecture and machines 
			designed for space travel is no mere coincidence.
 
			  
			 For a recently 
			published version and up-dated account of evidence drawn from 
			ancient rock inscriptions, Biblical sources and other writings and 
			artifacts, see Erich von Daniken’s Chariots of the Gods.  
			  
			 This Swiss 
			archaeologist also puts forward the provocative theory that the 
			origins of man are linked with visits to earth by beings from other 
			planets in ancient times.  
			 Returning to church architecture:
 
				
				where did the archetype come from - the archetype that has been perpetuated with slight variation from 
			ancient times up to the present day? And what are the reasons for 
			the particular form of that archetype?  
			 When David ascended to 
			heaven, the Apocrypha relates, the angels showed him the “church 
			image” that was to become the archetype of the Temple of Jerusalem. 
			Returning to earth David built a model of this from memory, and 
			ordered his son Solomon to erect a House of the Lord along the same 
			lines. So, it is believed, the Temple of Jerusalem, built in the 
			tenth century BC, came to be conceived.  
			 This is Zaitsev’s question it is, of course, a rhetorical one:
 
				
				“Perhaps
			the ‘church image’ was the image of a space-ship? Perhaps some 
			human being was induced by the astronauts to go aboard the 
			‘celestial machine,’ where he saw the abode of God? Such an interpretation of this ancient Judaic legend about the origin of 
			Solomon’s Temple would appear still more believable in the light of 
			other texts, notably the Apocrypha.”  
			Hindus believed their temples were built in the image of those of 
			other worlds, again the design being revealed by a deity. The 
			classical work, Ramayana, tells of a “celestial chariot,” a 
			two-storeyed vehicle with “many rooms and windows” which “roared 
			like a lion” at launching, “issued a single-toned sound” and “blazed 
			like red flames” as it raced through the air until finally it looked 
			like ‘a comet in the sky’.1 Another source, the Mahabharata, says 
			the vehicle was “activated by winged lightning.” 
			  
			The Sanskrit work, 
			Samarangana Sutradhara, contains a long description of the vehicle 
			which in Veda works is referred to as 
			vimana. 
			 
			 1 VyscheslavZaitsev, “Temples and Spaceships”, in Sputnik, Sept., 
			1968.
 
 As Zaitsev points out:
 
				
				“Christian and Judaic, like Buddhist and Brahmanist, architecture go back to one source, a certain ‘celestial 
			temple,’ the look of which on earth was best imitated by domed 
			churches.”  
			Supposing space-ships from other planets landed on earth long ago, 
			to primitive man would not the effect have been closely similar to 
			that of “cargo cults” by modern aircraft landing in such places as 
			New Guinea and New Britain in recent times?  
			  
			In those latter cases 
			the arrival of aircraft led to a worship of the creatures who 
			arrived by the craft, and various religious practices were adopted 
			as a means of trying to induce the aircraft and their magical 
			cargoes to return. A word or two about the “cargo cults,” as 
			anthropologists have dubbed them.  
			  
			Believed to have sprung up first 
			in Fiji in the 1880s, the pattern has always been repeated; a 
			prophet appears from among the people and proclaims the coming of 
			salvation, possibly in the form of a ship or an aircraft loaded down 
			with a host of goods ranging from refrigerators to canned food. He 
			orders certain rituals, and even such activities as the building of 
			a storehouse, an imitation landing strip or a wharf.  
			  
			Basically all 
			such cults are probably primitive attempts to set in motion the 
			necessary social changes required for coping with a situation of 
			cultural conflict the impinging of the modern and the “civilised” 
			upon the ancient and “barbaric” - all in the guise of a new 
			religion. In ancient times, one might conjecture, ships came to this 
			planet from another world (other worlds?), bringing strange beings 
			and strange - but vastly useful - goods.  
			  
			Perhaps the ships left, 
			perhaps some remained; perhaps some remained in orbit, and some men 
			of this planet, recognized for their superior intelligence or powers 
			of leadership compared to others in their group, were ferried to the 
			space vehicles and presented with gifts - and given instruction in 
			simple technology, such as the invention of the wheel, irrigation 
			canals, better techniques of working with stone or metal, and so on.  
			
			Certainly there is reason to believe that something of the sort may 
			have happened, possibly some 15,000 years ago. For it was about that 
			time that man began a massive break-through in the handling of 
			himself and his environment, a fact that has never been 
			satisfactorily explained. In that long ago man suddenly, for no 
			apparent reason, began to develop new techniques in such matters as 
			splitting bones to create tools, although existing techniques had 
			been in vogue for nearly a million years.
 
 Man is a puzzle to biologists, so tremendously different from his 
			nearest relatives, the giant apes, if we are to accept the 
			
			Darwinian 
			theory of evolution.
 
			  
			
			Among the primates, recent studies have shown, 
			man has 312 unique and exclusive characteristics that no other 
			primate possesses. For some reason he has evolved at a pace which, 
			compared with that of the evolution of other creatures on this 
			planet, can only be described as fantastically rapid. The 
			evolutionary process is known to be very slow, imperceptible over 
			the course of even hundreds of generations.  
			  
			Man’s greatest 
			evolutionary achievement was to develop a brain which from a 
			capacity of 400 cubic centimeters (established from very early 
			skulls of ape-like men) evolved to a capacity of 1300 cc, in the 
			space of a million years - a mere tick of the evolutionary clock. 
			Yet it took some thirty million years, on the other hand, for 
			primates to evolve a hand with an opposable thumb which, according 
			to the evolutionists, is what gave man his advantage in the race.  
			
			Two American writers, Otto Binder and Max Flindt, have recently put 
			forward a theory postulating that the answer can only lie with a 
			visit to this planet in ancient times of another intelligence from 
			another world, and a conscious effort on the part of the visitors to 
			breed a race of men on earth, either from motives of altruism or in 
			a spirit of biological experimentation.
 
			  
			If the spacemen were here, 
				
					
					
					Did they ever really leave?
					
					
					Did their presence give rise to the 
			almost universal myth of racial origin, a descent by superior beings 
			from “the stars” or “the sky?” 
					
					And did those feet in ancient times 
			walk upon England’s mountains green?  
			
			The question of biological experiments we leave to the biologists. 
			But dig into evidence for yourselves - and start an avalanche. We 
			suggest the following areas for fruitful investigation: 
			
			Myths and legends.  
			 The ancient classical religious works from all countries inhabited 
			since long, long ago - particularly India, China, 
			
			Sumeria, Babylon, 
			Egypt.
 
			 A fresh examination of “secret” systems of knowledge, religious and 
			scientific, including works on alchemy, astronomy, the secret books 
			of the Masonic orders and the Rosicrucians, and the system taught in 
			modern times by Gurdjieff. Religious architecture.
 
			 The “inexplicable” presence of what Ivan Sanderson calls OOPARTS (for 
			Out Of Place Artifacts) and OOPTHS (Out Of Place Things).
 
 
			For the remainder of this chapter let’s have a look at some of the 
			more outstanding “out-of-place objects:”  
				
				- In 1965 a Chinese 
			archaeologist published a report which speculated that space beings 
			may have visited this planet some 12,000 years ago. His principal 
			items of evidence came from
				
				caves in the Bayan-Kara-Ula Mountains, 
			on the China-Tibet border. Here have been found some 700 stone discs 
			covered with mysterious designs and writings. Each disc has a hole 
			in the centre, from which spirals a double groove out to the 
			circumference.    
				The caves are inhabited to this day by people of the 
			Ham and Dropa tribes - frail people, only some four feet in height; 
			they defy ethnic classification. The discs have been dated to 
			several thousand years ago. When finally deciphered, one of the 
			hieroglyphs, possibly set down by an ancient member of the Ham 
			tribe, reads:  
					
					“The Dropas came down from the clouds in their 
			gliders. Our men, women and children hid in the caves ten times 
			before the sunrise. When at last they understood the sign language 
			of the Dropas, they realized that the newcomers had peaceful 
			intentions...”  
				The discs were scraped free of adhering rock particles and sent to 
			Moscow for study. There scientists made two startling discoveries: 
			the discs contained a large amount of cobalt and other metals; and 
			they were found to vibrate in an odd rhythm, as though they carried 
			an electric charge or were part of an electric circuit.  
				  
				
				
				Primitive 
			art - cave drawings, clay figurines - provide an abundance of 
			material for the serious researcher into the possibility of space 
			visitors having been here long ago.      
				- A 
				
				rock picture found near the 
			town of Fergana, Uzbekistan, is of what looks like astronaut; an 
			artist in the Swiss Alps 4000 years ago drew a picture of a man in a 
			space helmet; the wall painting of a rocket ship in a niche of a 
			secret room beneath an old Roman church has already been mentioned: 
			
            
				a fresco in the Dechany Monastery, Yugoslavia, depicts angels flying 
			inside machines that closely resemble present-day spacecraft; 
			something very like a spaceship is seen on a seventeenth-century 
			icon. The Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, in the Moscow 
			Theological Academy, as representing the House of the Lord. 
				   
				-
			Japanese archaeologists have found at several excavations 
				dogu-clay figurines 
				- of humanoids clad in peculiar spacesuits, with 
			helmets entirely covering their heads. On the helmets are 
			representations of something akin to slit-type glasses, 
			breath-filters, antennae, hearing aids and even night-sight devices.
 
 
				-
			Rock pictures of “spacemen” have been found in the Sahara, in 
			Australia, in Soviet Central Asia and in other parts of the Old and 
			New Worlds. There are so many known drawings and carvings of this 
			kind, in fact, that they have become known as “the visiting cards of 
			space travelers.”
 
			 When we come to look at OOPARTS, as opposed to representations on rock walls and in figurines, the former are, 
				
				“undeniably
			manufactured or artificial objects said to have been found inside
			solid, undisturbed rock strata, just as fossil animals and plants 
			are 
			found.” 1  
			1 Ivan T. Sanderson, Uninvited Visitors, Cowles, 1967.  
			  
			Some of the more startling OOPARTS that have come to
			light include, 
				
					
					
					flat-headed steel nails discovered deep in a sandstone
			quarry in Scotland
					
					fine gold threads inside a large quarried block
			of limestone from northern England
					
					a bell-shaped, metallic vessel
			blasted from rock in Dorchester, England, the metal containing a 
			large proportion of silver
					
					a variety of objects found inside 
			lumps
			of coal (which would date them back to at least twelve million years
			ago), including a beautiful gold chain of intricate workmanship, a 
			prize for a Mrs. Culp of Illinois who found it when a lump of coal 
			she was putting into her stove, in 1891, broke in two 
			An object in 
			the Salzburg Museum, Austria, is another mystery - a perfect cube of 
			meteoritic nickel-iron, about two inches square, which is encircled 
			by a precisely turned deep groove, understood to have been machined, 
			found in a block of coal that would have to have been between twelve 
			and twenty-six million years old.  
			  
			A German engineer, engaged to 
			construct sewers for the city of Baghdad, discovered on a dusty 
			shelf in the local museum among objects labeled as “ritual objects” 
			some “stones” dating back a thousand years. Only one thing was known 
			for certain about these “stones” - they came from the Sassanid 
			period.  
			  
			The engineer added another piece of knowledge: 
			
			the “stones” 
			were in fact batteries.  
			 Other out-of-place items include a remarkable model of the solar 
			system dating from olden times and recovered from a sea-bed, in 
			which the movements of both planets and their satellites around the 
			sun are accurately effected by the turning of a crank; the 
			workmanship and materials preclude the construction of this 
			incredible device in recent times.
 
				
					
				 
			  |