In large part, this is due to a lack of
public education and a broadening of the corporate powers who
promote myths to achieve very specific and malicious goals all in
the name of profit.
...could soon be threatened by corporate
lobbyists who will do anything to protect their wealth at the
expense of your health.
But is it really science? What passes
for “science” today is a collection of health myths, half-truths,
intellectual dishonesty and fraudulent reporting to help serve
higher interests. Science is not really science anymore.
None of these solutions are ever
promoted by conventional medicine because they make no money.
There is no such thing as a drug without a side effect. There is no financial incentive for anyone in today’s system of medicine (drug companies, hospitals, doctors, etc.) to actually make patients well.
Profits are found in continued sickness,
not wellness or prevention.
Mammography is a very good example.
Chemotherapy is another.
The only healthy, aware, critically
thinking individuals are all 100% free of pharmaceuticals and
Medical research has well established that the direct injection of foreign proteins and other toxic material (particularly known immune-sensitizing poisons such as mercury) makes the recipient more, not less, easily affected by what he/she encounters in the future.
This means they do the opposite of
immunize, commonly even preventing immunity from developing after
With the anti-vaccination movements now
exposing the truth on the internet,
the medical community is now on high alert, defending their claims
and being told by vaccine manufacturers that they must never let
their patients (or parents) think that the risks could outweigh the
benefits, when in reality, it is precisely the opposite that is
Contrary to popular belief and marketing, childhood diseases in a developed country are not as dangerous as we are led to believe. Catching a particular disease does not mean you will die from it. Vaccines were actually introduced at a time when diseases had already declined to a low risk level.
This fact is proven, scientifically.
Some examples include,
...to name a few of many.
Those who become fully informed of the
dangers of vaccines never see them in the same light again, as their
motives then become clear.
Moreover, a scientifically-naive public has been conned into a fraudulent correlation between elevated cholesterol and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cholesterol has not been shown to actually cause CVD.
To the contrary, cholesterol is vital
to our survival, and trying to artificially lower it can have
detrimental effects, particularly as we age.
Could we really maintain a dietary lifestyle that was so foreign to many of our ancestral populations without any ill effects on our health? Many researchers are now concluding that the answer to that question is “NO.”
Current data is now suggesting that
lower cholesterol levels predate the development of cancer.
But is this apparent ‘blanket need’ to
strive towards lowering our cholesterol justified? And, indeed, is
The difference is in the ‘transporters’ (the lipoproteins HDL and LDL) and both types are essential for the human body’s delivery logistics to work effectively. Problems can occur, however, when the LDL particles are both small and their carrying capacity outweighs the transportation potential of available HDL.
This can lead to more cholesterol being
‘delivered’ around the body with lower resources for returning
excess capacity to the liver.
This applies to almost every type of medical screening for cancer and several other diseases. Medical screening carries an immense risk in itself, not only due to the damage inflicted by screening techniques on the human body, but by the very nature of medical follow-up protocols.
These protocols usually encourage
patients to enter deeper into more invasive techniques, which
further cripple health and lead to a very high percentage of
These “false positives” aren’t just
financial and emotional strains, they may also lead to many
unnecessary and invasive biopsies. In fact, 70 to 80 percent of all
positive mammograms do not, upon biopsy, show any presence of
Only about 3 percent of all men die from prostate cancer.
The PSA test usually leads to
overdiagnosis - biopsies and treatment in which the side effects are
impotence and incontinence. Repeated biopsies may spread cancer
cells into the track formed by the needle, or by spilling cancerous
cells directly into the bloodstream or lympathic system.
Preventive education demands increased funding for research into new dietary, physical activity, behavioral, socioeconomic, environmental and medical approaches for the prevention of chronic disease.
Children who grow into teenagers and then adults require more accountability for their own well-being through health conscious decisions which are motivated by proper practical and theoretical applications.
They need to know that treatment modalities and pharmaceutical applications may not save their health in the future.
Substantial political and financial contributions are also imperative to invest in prevention more effectively to regulate revisions and mandate policies which affect the governing bodies of health and education.
Any procrastination or failure to resolve these matters in the next decade will only lead to the further deterioration of human health and healthcare systems.
Proper leadership and effective
communication regarding these preventive measures may still reverse
screening/treatment trends and consequently reverse this thinking to
ultimately promote a healthier aging population.
Drinking any amount of fluoride is dangerous to your health and has NEVER been proven to prevent tooth decay. It’s actually the biggest scientific fraud ever to be promoted by national and international Governments.
Fluoride has been linked to,
...and even very small concentrations
can disrupt DNA repair enzymes by 50%.
And on other body parts, too, including our thyroid gland.
Much of the original proof that fluoride is safe for humans in low doses was generated by A-bomb program scientists, who had been secretly ordered to provide “evidence useful in litigation” against defense contractors for fluoride injury to citizens.
The first lawsuits against the U.S.
A-bomb program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage,
the documents show.
Find the healthiest 5 people you know and you’ll find they typically don’t subscribe to the health myths promoted by mainstream medicine.
Your longevity and aging gracefully
depends on it.