An Advanced Alien Case Study
Like the rest of his crew, he’s cautious about giving out his name. His comments, although usually framed obliquely, sometimes support the intervention and he tends to distantly rationalize its worst abuses.
It’s a detachment based on a
larger map of history and daily reports about alien affairs, a
perspective posed as though distant, given the millions of light
years to Centaurus A, reportedly his resident galaxy. He isn’t a
so-called “Verdant,” the aliens described in Phillip Krapf’s books
about an alien alignment visiting here. Instead, he’s from a group
of hyper-advanced aliens who he and other aliens say long pre-date
The human model for interaction now includes regular hints about community consciousness and hyper-spatial subtleties (i.e. to scale your mind’s energy levels way down at least five orders of finer, tighter depth/dimension to allow for quiet, studious remove from alien attempts at manipulation and to allow for comparative phenomenal perspective during interactions).
Some humans in the interaction tend to be cautious
because of controversies that our discourse touches on.
Like other aliens, he knows when larger perspective or the greater, collective wisdom of open-ended consciousness exceeds his intellectual faculties, but he sometimes tries to reduce even those divergent perspectives to the terms of an IFSP project, here. And like other aliens, he defers to larger considerations, at least in form as a matter of course, even if he disagrees. When he disagrees, he waits until the subject of discussion has changed to another topic.
He sometimes tries to tangentially manipulate a context to
change the topic.
It’s a kind of managerial identity salience that he’s quick to jump
into. When remotely interacting with humans, he doesn’t let his gaze
leap around the room to look at every other alien in his vicinity.
Instead, he seems to pride himself on his (psychotronically
assisted) ability to hear their thoughts without having to look
They’re pre-planned IFSP projects. He appears to minimize his physical gestures, like Verdants do. Both populations seem to feel that the appearance of subtlety makes younger IFSP populations feel acknowledged and included. However, like Verdants, when he moves his body he can move very quickly.
That same quickness in aliens tends
to surprise humans.
Younger-lived populations evidence both a curiosity and an
admiration for such technology. The difference between his
capabilities and theirs clearly looms as an advantage, although he’s
careful not to make it seem too deliberate or conspicuous. In other
words, his presence in a room opens a marginally excited curiosity
among the younger aliens, which they try not to be too obvious
about. He uses that distinction to his advantage.
More specifically, he has been said to be from the large elliptical galaxy Centaurus A, which is some 13 million light years from the Milky Way. He verbalizes often yet often tries to pre-empt other aliens who might remark here. He and his group clearly want to control the agenda here, knowing that there are competitors for influence over humankind.
has been described as having pre-dated our own by billions of years,
and aliens of his group have been described as capable of living up
to 11 million years, individually.
His population reportedly contributed to
Verdant genetic development at some point in the past. Counter-posed
aliens informed us of his population’s genetic inputs to Verdants
and also provided the graphic. In other words, his population
preceded and may now control some of the Verdant and gray agenda.
Instead, it appears to be a hierarchically
structured project nominally run by a materially motivated group of
aliens who’ve planted human-alien hybrids and other prototype aliens
on planets near our solar system (without thinking to ask us, in
advance, about doing so).
When ostensibly competing (or counter-posed) counterparts point out that the IFSP’s breeding program “direct operatives” have been inserted into some ranking positions on this planet and then used to orchestrate various crimes against humanity.
(Fritz Thyssen, the prime early financer of Hitler
is but one person cited by such aliens as being “direct operative”
of the IFSP), we hear that the old alien’s cohorts rationalized the
action as necessary to manipulate humankind toward a larger
objective (when this difficult subject comes up, it resonates in a
larger cohort context, within which the rationalization arose).
Other reported direct operatives are noted in previous chapters, and their crimes cover a broad spectrum of active, ongoing dangers to humankind. The old alien says it’s all done to assure that humankind can be changed to a non-offensive, non-sexual form and to assure that prohibited weapons won’t be carried into space by humans (prohibitions that predate humankind). In other words, the IFSP’s breeding program is intended to almost entirely replace humankind with an IFSP kind of prototype.
prototype is a human-hybridized-with-grays version, much like the
reported Roswell prototypes that Phillip Corso and others described
seeing, first-hand. It may initially (for hundreds of years) be a
hybrid human/alien form that looks much like the Roswell aliens.
Here’s what the old alien showed us:
better to scale your energy way down (several orders of magnitude
lower in energy intensity) and essentially make yourself transparent
so that you can better assess the aliens’ behaviors.
perspective of his population’s energy and resource objectives, all
human concerns are ancillary, of less importance. His attitude can
fluctuate from disdain, to judgmental externality, at times. His
attitude is almost always dry and distant. However, due to his old
age and the exigencies of hyper-advanced alien interactions with
more recently-evolved mega-populations, some of his seemingly rigid
attitude and behavior could simply be but one hard-line aspect of
what may be a more complex alien.
To hear rationalization for numerous
crimes against humanity pains me, both because of how the victims
and their families suffered and because of the need for other humans
to be aware of this. *A limited human cohort has witnessed his
communications, at intervals.
Verdants are reportedly sexual aliens with anatomy, genitalia, and desires analogous to those of a human. In other words, the whole intervention - abductions, forced breeding and planned replacement of humankind, the death of the grays’ and other planets - is supposedly done to assure the objective of non-sexual, inoffensive populations where encountered.
Meanwhile, Verdants exist in drastic disproportion to the
manipulated, younger aliens of their alignment. Verdants reportedly
live a pampered, sexual life, changing sexual partners every 4-6
decades or so. In short, it may be safe to say that the IFSP was put
together in part to serve the needs of an expanding sexual
population (Verdants), which would mean that some of the old alien’s
argument is selectively framed and incomplete.
The old alien’s blunt, sometimes- insensitive outlook may be due to the fact that his own population, although older than Verdants (who reportedly reached our technological level 229 million years ago), was originally like Verdants - an aggressive, self-rationalizing population that threw caution aside and overpopulated in order to gain resources and domain long ago. In other words, some of the same crude impulses and assumptions that caused the old alien’s predecessors to exceed ecological proportions still live on in the old alien and his group.
We see evidence for this in his/their behavior, albeit a typically
subdued alien version.
It isn't an elaboration about how one is or thinks, versus
the typical person in their pack. Instead, they assume that the
group is either listening in some form, or can monitor the
interaction. Indeed, some of the seemingly diffident tone is due to
their assumption that you aren't very evolved if you're still
wrapped up in your individual experience and not sharing.
One problem with the old alien and his peers (at least their old security types who tend to, and apparently partly designed, the grays we see today) is that they’re frustrated because I disagree with their actions here (manipulation of human conflicts, breeding program operatives’ infiltration of human society to steer humans toward IFSP objectives) and I'm an active, published critic of their intervention.
Part of my concern
is that IFSP aliens come not from this galaxy, not even this galaxy
group, but from a galaxy group that’s further from us than are the
four nearest galaxy groups. In other words, there are 150 or more
galaxies of varying size that are closer to us than the gray
alignment’s home galaxy.
Again, judging from the old alien’s
statements and those of competing aliens plus the behavior of IFSP
aliens, the old alien’s group may have played a decisive role in
designing the current grays.
In other words, how do I (believe it or not) plan for us to improve genetically and scale down the crudeness of human sexuality?
Marshall Vian Summers wrote a book, The Allies of Humanity, which
transcribes a statement by yet another group of aliens. The aliens
reportedly told Summers that the gray-alignment is engaged in a
prohibited traffic and trade of biological materials. In other
words, after previously manipulating a breeding program/infiltration of the old gray planet, "Verdants" have the lack of
good taste to portray themselves as a native biome success story,
while grays and some others are total failures (who now serve the
Verdant alignment obediently).
The old alien security figure I've heard from for years sometimes suggests that grays (and apparently some Verdants, also) were more or less designed by his peers.
When such statements are made, they are partly informed by the inputs of other, apparently monitoring aliens who clearly rival the old alien.
It's a strange situation:
In other words, at times it seems as though he can't think about us or younger IFSP aliens as much more than prototypes, biological projects to be revised, over and over again.
He thinks we must be improved so that we’re less dangerous. So, although I cite unnecessary human casualties, he’s relatively immune to feelings for innocents killed in the process. He think’s that’s due to the uncorrected human context - he sees a prototypical objective. He has what appears to be a non-sexual’s long-term, schematic design in mind, which leaves little or no room for concern about human casualties. Ironically, he, himself, may be the result of genetic engineering intended to reduce or eliminate what were once considered emotionally reactive tendencies and vulnerabilities.
In part, that may have been a mistake, given the crimes now rationalized by his kind.
After many years of witnessing such crimes, they may be less capable of comprehending the damage done. Instead, they tend to regard humans as uncorrected and potentially dangerous as a regime aggregate. All of it - the crimes, Verdant greed, and their own, distant shadings of self-interest - is outwardly rationalized in terms of human struggle leading to a final solution.
Although his peers have said some humans seem to understand the
equalitarian social identity of the larger universe, the old alien’s
attitude could be complicated by an assumption that our failure
could be their gain (re: Δt/alt t and the Verdant client
population). It seems predatory. Behavior premised on boosting one
population’s genetic spread into another population tends toward
primitive impulses and self-centered, singular assumptions.
That's what's interesting about his case. There are others who are far more evolved (I don't mean this in a prototypical sense) than either the grays or the "Verdants."
Again, I don’t like that name because it
seems to hang the death of target planets around the victims’
necks - as though they could never equal the simple, trademark boast
of certain Verdants: a surviving, biologically diverse planet.
They may want to absorb at least some aliens who have
no alternatives, aliens who will do what they’re told without
This has caused concern among some
humans, who sense a larger danger.
It was too easily, directly manipulated by the old alien in charge, and it showed that due to my unusual subject-development (exopolitical dynamics and critiques encouraged by sympathetic hyperversal aliens), a long-term, possible offender has been drawn in to monitor me. It’s possible that the old alien, himself, may have had a role, on-scene, during the demise of the original gray planet. It’s also possible that he doesn’t want to see a gray-like outcome here.
a tricky subject to explore when (subdued) tempers flare and the
issue of how humans will judge it all is on the line. No non-human
or non-human-hybrid alien in my experience has yet allowed anger
free, visible reign in his or her behavior.
The most disturbing aspect is how, in order to hedge his position in human eyes and abort contrary discussion, he sometimes conspicuously threatens or hacks at high profile, noted humans.
He seems to want to draw their minds in, but not their
reactions, by doing so, while aliens beyond him seem to want him to
look a certain way in doing so. He wants to pre-empt human impulses
that would complicate the interaction - he knows it’s tracked by other
humans. About eight years ago, he made a statement about being like
a military s.o.b. who gets even for any crap from subordinates. In
other words, either he or someone else on the scene wanted us to
know he has a memory to return to such subjects.
I have to admit - it seemed staged and overly deliberate, to me.
Rather than behave in similarly prejudicial manner, I simply pointed
out the statements and the context to other humans - more a study
than counter remark.
Some of his venting appears to anticipate pending
implications, i.e. once he harshly centered on me, and another alien
compared my predicament to a person standing in center of the round
gallery of tiered prison cells in the old Marion IL federal
penitentiary, forced to listen to a dressing down by aliens. Not
pleasant, of course, but a good person sees beyond such.
Suffice it to say, the debate is ongoing.
For example, my report about Thyssen could cause tensions among Jewish populations regarding the IFSP intervention and a widely reported “Semitic” enclave in the Altair star system, yet the report is honest, as stated. I waited months before discussing it further in print. Again, the old alien tried to avert my report about Thyssen.
The old alien is both aware of, and suggests that he and his cohort can manipulate, the ugliest human subcultures (i.e. child-kidnapping/child-killing pedophile networks in elite economies - crimes seen as both covering for, and offsetting IFSP abductions, IFSP sabotage of human order, and IFSP control of malign human operatives).
He’s careful to not seem too direct in doing so. The irony is that there’s some daylight in this, so to speak - the old alien seems as though he’d be content if we were to correct human affairs through sudden, effective expose of those same, human criminal subcultures. However, the specter of elite/direct operative crimes has revolutionary expose potential that his kind don’t want to see squandered without major, enduring changes.
They’ve set up a
crisis for us that poses insanely corrupt self-interest against the
Steven Greer’s book Hidden Truth and articles by Michael Salla PhD argue that JFK was shot in part to thwart his move toward minimal disclosure about aliens back in 1963-4.
There have been guarded
remarks by the old alien’s peers about how “we’re sorry” about some
crimes against humanity, along with mention that humans weren’t
expected to know this much at this time. Ironically, we wouldn’t
know this much without the help of hyper-advanced aliens.
Instead, he wants us to think that IFSP-operative Rothschilds worked on challenges to such greed. Rothschild may have attempted to manipulate human conflicts toward IFSP advantage (i.e. a flimsy hope that humans will continue to honor the mere paper claims of IFSP operatives).
And when critiques arise over a direct operative Rothschild/Rockefeller role in cults and sexual abuse of mind control operatives, the old alien and his cohort sometimes make claims about a role in phenomena surrounding Jesus - again, playing to the crowd. The old alien’s behavior raises questions about whether a mind that has, in some networked way, had a role in manipulating mass offenses has the sensitivities needed to assure good relations and a real end to conflict (if you raise this critique with him, he flips it to question whether we do).
He rationalizes the intervention in terms
of our largely uncorrected human nature and his group's objectives.
He almost never uses alt-cycle technology as a non-lethal weapon (here, i.e. on me) when his command and integrity is challenged, but he sometimes tries to redirect communications and discussion that faults him. Almost all of his demonstrations of such technology have been for human education - to let us know its characterization and limits.
to be part of a security structure that’s prone to inflexibility,
which can lead to failure of analytical and personnel dynamics.
Again, the old alien’s peers have what appears to be a non-sexual regime’s long-term, schematic design in mind, which leaves little or no room for concern about human casualties. They show an ability to coldly escalate dangerous and destructive doings in a stimulus-response way. It’s less marked and more subdued than a human version, of course. Perhaps, as noted in previous pages, it’s better referenced as an alien sort of Munchausen’s syndrome.
Appended to an operational scheme that he, himself, admits is premised on maximum, opportunistic corruption at the direct operative level here, he’s reluctant to admit that it is both failing and unecological.
prefers to point out the goal: possible evolutionary improvements,
and a manipulated conflicts/pacification scheme (while others of his
kind leak weak, deeply stifled hints that the IFSP’s direct
operatives could be rolled up, yet they imply that to do so could
bring us into the IFSP orbit).
Once, after I’d elicited a statement that the old alien’s associates (perhaps the old alien, also) had actually witnessed the gray planet-kill while tasked there, the old alien appeared to (or was made to appear to) conspicuously gloat in some subtle way, as though he enjoyed the sense of power and control he had over those who’d heard the remark. It was a deeply disturbing moment.
Other old order
aliens may have set up and colored the situation for humans to
witness. They certainly pointed out that aspect of the old alien, at
So, like reported “direct operative” Rothschilds/Biderman-Du Pont/Rockefeller/and Bush Sr., they sometimes seem distorted, mousy and unformed as individuals.
They would dispute such a description
and would say their aim is human equality. They all lean into the
coolly distant, judgmental structure that sustains them. Of course,
they might say detachment is necessary. From the old alien’s
perspective, however, all of the subordinate alien and human
operatives are easy to manipulate.
That kind of thinking is dangerous because the regime can ruin other planets without thinking much about it. And when a regime thinks itself invulnerable, its individuals feel impervious. That raises a basic, ghastly question. Do such regimes tend to design their hybrids and target populations to be convenient, servile extensions of the dominant mega-population that controls them?
No doubt this is an
At times this has resembled and has cited the pampered disdain of human imperialists (frustrated, dysfunctional angst paralleled by scenarios of violence when reminders of others intrude). In the “three ellipticals”/IFSP case it centers on a different set of circumstances and is more subdued. Again, the old alien’s group sometimes resonates with a reflective quality that’s rationalized as being symmetrically determined by the cause and effect of human impulses (as though the problem is us, not them).
Due to deficiencies in various sections of
the “three ellipticals”/IFSP regime, there’s a lean - a falling into
group agenda that can, at times, only cohere with presumption and
There’s a coldly antisocial kind of glare, a detachment in them that
they seem to immerse in - as though it’s supposed to scare us off.
They lean into the IFSP (partly “three ellipticals”) routine as
though we could never get anywhere near them.
As a result, within the regime there’s an idealistic remove from conditions that exist outside of the regime, which suggests a lack of critical thinking. That is enforced by psychotronic controls and fear among the regime’s dependents, who sometimes actually see or hear about the harm done to target populations like humankind. Given the removal of troublemaker or emotional genes within the regime, the end result can be a dangerously handicapped group climate.
larger the arrangement grows, the more distanced the internal
critique and the more easily its members can rationalize wrongdoing
for the regime’s agenda. Again, there are structurally-multiplied
ironies that obscure harm done.
Now they sometimes encourage Verdants to take too much, so neither group can return to basic equivalency (between populations). They’re effectively blind to it, as though it doesn’t really exist. Because we’re bound to equivalency between populations, it’s like we don’t really exist in their logic. The danger is that they assume they’re more important than other aliens, so they don’t even question whether it’s right to take too much.
Instead, they arrogate more and
more to themselves as though their designs should eclipse the rights
of other aliens. And if that’s the case, some of them may think IFSP
crimes against humanity don’t really matter because we aren’t
important, to begin with.
That’s most ironic because in late 2004 hyper-advanced alien sources explicitly alleged and partly demonstrated that to some extent the 9-11 attacks were remotely steered, promoted and guided toward completion by IFSP manipulators - we even viewed the two, onboard IFSP individuals (either late-stage hybrids or nearly “human”) tasked to make sure Bin Laden and Zawahiri followed through (this ability to view them was helped and steered by critical hyperversal aliens).
The two IFSP individuals were sitting at an alien panel of some sort, doing their work.
To the extent that I could do so, I noted that their skin and health appeared better than most humans, and their attitude was relatively airy - as though not vulnerable to the typical perils of life on this planet. After years of experience with aliens, one notes such characteristics quickly. The report about an IFSP role in effectively steering such deadly events created a major stir, here, to say the least, and was followed by our repeated checks, counterchecks and testing, which basically supported the hyperversals’ report.
In other words,
Verdant Gina’s behavior was a prime example of how offenders of the
sort can spin on their heels with infantile, regime assumptions, and
say, as Gina did, that she thinks humans will “blow up” Earth. Of
course, Gina, may not have known about the actions of higher-ranking IFSP aliens.
Some of it is best
studied as a kind of animal behavior.
* See similar allegations in Cathy
O’Brien’s books re a Bush/Cheney conversation about the project at
Bohemian Grove; Dr. Michael Wolf’s allegations about HIV on Richard Boylan’s site; and Harvard medical professor Len Horowitz’s book,
Despite having come from a distant location, some in his group see an opportunity here. They appear to have personal genetic motives, or at least their own genetic inputs, in mind when viewing our population. At times, their bias is obvious. By framing much of what they do here in terms of changing human genetic makeup, some can easily rationalize the IFSP’s crimes against humanity.
The old alien acts as an overseer, a
role that he wants us to think is only indirect and advisory.
Imagine the situation that existed there for over 100 million years:
The old alien’s regime probably felt bone-crunching pressure to shrink populations in Centaurus A.
As a result, the old alien and other “three ellipticals” hyperversals are often too direct and presumptuous,
seldom patient enough to fully realize that that this is not that
same galaxy - we aren’t in a galaxy merger crisis, nor will we face
one for another three billion years.
Their crimes reportedly include: provoking and profiting by
wars of aggression, the overthrow of democracies, provocation of
religious conflicts, child sex slave racketeering, repeated habitual
sabotage of independent human peace and ecology processes, massive
narcotics trafficking by IFSP operatives, and the reported killing
of 25 million humans via a deliberately planted HIV epidemic, among
Some of them appear to orchestrate IFSP
sabotage of humankind pur-suant to attempted Verdant colonization of
our surroundings. It sometimes seems like the old alien and his
peers feel we’re part of the mess that they left behind in Centaurus
A. More importantly, if our information is correct, the old alien’s
population wants more control in that vicinity. Centaurus A is a
larger, possibly more populous galaxy than its neighbor M83.
They probably have relations with Verdants and with Verdant competitors in M83 and surrounding galaxies. However, during the last 200 million years, the Centaurus A galaxy merger required that all populations limit their numbers in order to accommodate refugees, yet in M83, a galaxy next to Centaurus A, Verdants did the exact opposite and grew to 500 trillion, which is ten times beyond safe limits.
Meanwhile, the old alien’s population wants a measure of control over all aliens in the vicinity, in part to preserve the ecology and keep the peace, in part to validate their own mega-population sense of themselves. The old alien’s peers feel regime pressure to do as they’ve always done: seek more influence over the aliens in the vicinity.
Meanwhile, the intrusion of an
overgrown, planet-killing colonizer (Verdants) in our vicinity
alarms Milky Way aliens. It has created an emergency situation,
here, of a different sort.
However, rather than take the hint that “three ellipticals”-IFSP behavior is wrong, the old alien sometimes seems to think the attention he gets with the IFSP’s brutal spectacle is proof of its merits. The old alien and his crew seem to think “three ellipticals”-IFSP aliens are everything, yet our alien neighbors and we can see what they aren’t. We see which qualities they lack.
problem is that Verdants can see that, too, and will try to twist it
to their advantage.
However, there’s one obvious yet easily overlooked aspect of the old alien’s population that we shouldn’t forget. His society originated billions of years ago. For various reasons, they decided to embark on a breeding and resource campaign to outnumber competing aliens. We can expect to see other cases of the sort, but in the old alien’s case, a long history of corruptions, conflicts, political contortions and arrogations (not the whole story, of course) have made his population almost compulsive about wanting to control others before others become a challenge to them.
There’s a margin of ecological logic in that - if it’s balanced by competing populations or sections that provide a check on offenders, yet such assumptions can breed extreme arrogance, i.e. the 500 trillion Verdant sexuals still trying to take more planets for themselves.
It’s most ironic that just when Centaurus A needed to shrink its
population numbers, Verdants were allowed to spawn without limit.
Something is drastically wrong there.
In other words, do we strive to
simply emulate some ancient alien past, or do we learn from them in
order to create a better, more equal future?
His aliens can tell us ugly truths of the intervention in order to prepare “bad-human, bad sexuals” propaganda so that it will already have been in place, hence seemingly accessible, for a post planet-kill population of human refugees.
In other words, if and when the IFSP
allows its operatives to ruin the planet via a thinly disguised
“misuse” of gravitic technology (or direct Verdant use of same), the
propaganda about primitive, sexual humans who killed the planet will
already have spread among us. That way no one can say the planet was
sacrificed before we had a chance to know what was happening. It
would make it easier to blame us, rather than them.