Extending a Universe Cycle
For example, all advanced aliens intent on surviving such a feat might need to protect themselves before manipulating negative and alternate cycle phenomena like black holes and the larger resonance of hyperspace, conceivably leaving the “mass” of some black holes to be used for structure within, and navigation into or around an extended universe cycle.
They would need to agree
on and coordinate universal standards for negative and alternate
cycling of hyperspace. The scheme might be configured on a galaxy supercluster scale, and larger. Advanced aliens wouldn’t wait until
the last moment to act. Instead, they would prepare in advance and
would time or perpetuate their actions to reserve enough energy/time
in a universe cycle to be able to extend or capture it within a
The black hole and the galaxy are expected to merge, later. Astronomers now see that galaxies existed between 600-900 million years after what (astronomers surmise was) a “Big Bang” beginning to the universe, and black holes are thought to have formed earlier. However, alternative models don’t require a Big Bang beginning, in the first place. The question is whether all galaxies formed near large black holes.
holes have a kind of event horizon around them, so, in place of a
Big Bang beginning, the event horizons around early black holes
could simply indicate the limits of our current thinking. In other
words, an earlier hyperversals’ phase of the universe could exist
just across or within the sum of those event horizons.
No upstart group of new populations would be allowed to ignore existing conventions for maintaining a healthy universal continuity. Advanced, hyperversal aliens would try to steer younger populations toward such conventions. Some hyperversals might try to pre-empt communications between younger populations in order to impose their preferences, which might cause resentment.
basic accords would be necessary, all in the name of the larger
ecology. Advanced aliens may simply configure all that they do so
that the universe regenerates continuously.
On the one hand, their
idea of the universe must be more condensed, yet, at the same time,
more airy and hyperspatial (cycling inwardly yet resonating far, far
outwardly). It’s conceivable that over time, they must orient all
their energy technologies to conform to a habitable continuity of
negative and alternate-cycle resonance (in hyperspace).
It would be naïve to assume that all
hyper-advanced aliens have overcome their faults. In other words,
some of their energy and population strategies could strain the
social fabric of both their own societies and other, affected
populations. New populations like humankind might see this as a cold
shoulder, a deeply withdrawn, if not insular set of assumptions on
the hyperversals’ part. Some hyperversal populations will have
manipulated other aliens toward mass extinctions or will have
steered aggressive client populations like the Verdants to do so.
would be dangerous to trust the lives of so many with but one
universal regime. Instead, we can assume that peaceful diversity
would be safer, due to diversity of origin and diversity of supercluster neighborhoods - assuming, of course, that hyperversal
aliens see the same, far-flung kind of universe that we do. Their
technology allows for a closer kind of interconnectedness.
Concretized notions of
individuality would seem bizarre, if not primitive - vastly less
-X3 argues that populations must be reduced and be able to merge or cohabit in order to extend a universe cycle.
To some readers that may sound premature, as though it needn’t be a concern at the moment. To some hyperversals, however, it’s never too soon to begin planning correctly because a basic Δt/alt t conservation must be maintained continuously.
* After years of experience with hyperversals, I can
report that if we assimilate within basic, evolving standards of
nonviolence and nonviolation, they begin to treat us with an
essentially benign regard - which brings up a question: How do we,
ourselves, regard younger groups who want to stalk about with
dangerous weapons? Imagine a younger species doing that and you
begin to get the flavor of how it seems to hyperversals.
The truth may be that some
populations like the “three ellipticals” subculture never quite
learn how to reduce their numbers as other aliens might wish they
would. Instead, they may prefer both a sexual and non-sexual, mixed
strategy, and may assume that the universe can be recycled in ways
that are more gradual, yet may seem precipitous from our relatively
primitive perspective on astrophysics.
Our sense of vision will be
remotely hyperspatial, as will our understanding of dark energy
phenomena, black holes and more. Humans are already developing
remote sensitivities of the sort.
* If other “three ellipticals”
hyperversals have better models and understandings, they either
aren’t sharing them with us or they rely on what, to us, seems to be
another faction to do so.
From (what is posed as) a hard-line perspective of “three ellipticals” populations, only dominance hierarchies and strict manipulations can achieve a universal ecology. From the perspective of other, sometimes independent or variously aggregated hyperversals, the universe may sometimes be viewed in more cooperative, legalistic terms (transparent agreements between communities).
Deeper interactions and shared ecology lead to larger conventions over time. So, even if some hyperversal populations fail to manage their numbers proportionately, all aliens must evolve and participate in universal conventions.
There are limits on everyone.