14 - Extending a Universe Cycle

If, as some hyper-advanced aliens assert, they’ve participated in mobilizations to extend the universe cycle, it might have required some hard decisions.

For example, all advanced aliens intent on surviving such a feat might need to protect themselves before manipulating negative and alternate cycle phenomena like black holes and the larger resonance of hyperspace, conceivably leaving the “mass” of some black holes to be used for structure within, and navigation into or around an extended universe cycle.

They would need to agree on and coordinate universal standards for negative and alternate cycling of hyperspace. The scheme might be configured on a galaxy supercluster scale, and larger. Advanced aliens wouldn’t wait until the last moment to act. Instead, they would prepare in advance and would time or perpetuate their actions to reserve enough energy/time in a universe cycle to be able to extend or capture it within a longer continuity.

Recently, astronomers photographed a large black hole quasar, HE0450-2958, that’s five billion light years away and may be creating a galaxy at the end of one of the polar jets that shoot out from above and below the black hole.

The black hole and the galaxy are expected to merge, later. Astronomers now see that galaxies existed between 600-900 million years after what (astronomers surmise was) a “Big Bang” beginning to the universe, and black holes are thought to have formed earlier. However, alternative models don’t require a Big Bang beginning, in the first place. The question is whether all galaxies formed near large black holes.

All black holes have a kind of event horizon around them, so, in place of a Big Bang beginning, the event horizons around early black holes could simply indicate the limits of our current thinking. In other words, an earlier hyperversals’ phase of the universe could exist just across or within the sum of those event horizons.

All aliens must evolve, and we’re beginning to see the larger, inhabited context into which they evolve. As is now evident here, when young populations begin to experiment with negative and alternate cycle (gravitic) technology, they may be visited by advanced aliens who must educate them about basic universals standards and ecology.

No upstart group of new populations would be allowed to ignore existing conventions for maintaining a healthy universal continuity. Advanced, hyperversal aliens would try to steer younger populations toward such conventions. Some hyperversals might try to pre-empt communications between younger populations in order to impose their preferences, which might cause resentment.

However, basic accords would be necessary, all in the name of the larger ecology. Advanced aliens may simply configure all that they do so that the universe regenerates continuously.

This raises one basic question. Why do we see discrete evidence that, over time, all stars and galaxies have dispersed such that they all trace back to a singularity (or singularities) in the same theoretical location some 13.7 billion years ago? It’s a cosmological conundrum, yet if we set aside our assumptions and allow for the fact that with advanced science and the ability to slip in and around event horizons, hyperversal aliens may simply view the universe differently than we do.

On the one hand, their idea of the universe must be more condensed, yet, at the same time, more airy and hyperspatial (cycling inwardly yet resonating far, far outwardly). It’s conceivable that over time, they must orient all their energy technologies to conform to a habitable continuity of negative and alternate-cycle resonance (in hyperspace).

In an imperfect universe containing billions of galaxies, there are reluctant newcomers and problem cases. Although hyper-advanced populations certainly know the ropes better than newcomers, the coldly calculated stratagems of some hyper-advanced aliens could be emotionally scarring. This would be particularly noticeable in cases where a given hyperversal population’s own history was unusually manipulative or destructive.

It would be naïve to assume that all hyper-advanced aliens have overcome their faults. In other words, some of their energy and population strategies could strain the social fabric of both their own societies and other, affected populations. New populations like humankind might see this as a cold shoulder, a deeply withdrawn, if not insular set of assumptions on the hyperversals’ part. Some hyperversal populations will have manipulated other aliens toward mass extinctions or will have steered aggressive client populations like the Verdants to do so.

In short, the best and most intelligent sensitivities of some hyperversals have been challenged by the cruelties of larger circumstance and precedent. Ironically, those are exactly the kind of conditions that corrupt leadership tries to take advantage of.

It would be dangerous to trust the lives of so many with but one universal regime. Instead, we can assume that peaceful diversity would be safer, due to diversity of origin and diversity of supercluster neighborhoods - assuming, of course, that hyperversal aliens see the same, far-flung kind of universe that we do. Their technology allows for a closer kind of interconnectedness.

The community of mind assumptions of a given hyperversal population might be difficult for some humans to understand. Some may wonder: how could numerous aliens share thoughts in a merged, community of mind manner? How could they all get along? From the old human perspective that might seem strange, yet if one were to begin, instead, from a community of mind perspective (being able to jointly share thoughts), the fearful, if not manipulative pitfalls of separate individuality might seem stranger.

Concretized notions of individuality would seem bizarre, if not primitive - vastly less intelligent.

The hyperversal I call “-X3” has made statements about how to safely cycle the universe. -X3 has asserted that hyperversals can best make necessary distinctions to prepare for, and conserve, an extended universe cycle. He/they seem to assume that recently evolved aliens may not know how to plan and accord correctly.

-X3 argues that populations must be reduced and be able to merge or cohabit in order to extend a universe cycle.

To some readers that may sound premature, as though it needn’t be a concern at the moment. To some hyperversals, however, it’s never too soon to begin planning correctly because a basic Δt/alt t conservation must be maintained continuously.

* After years of experience with hyperversals, I can report that if we assimilate within basic, evolving standards of nonviolence and nonviolation, they begin to treat us with an essentially benign regard - which brings up a question: How do we, ourselves, regard younger groups who want to stalk about with dangerous weapons? Imagine a younger species doing that and you begin to get the flavor of how it seems to hyperversals.
 

Given the relatively minor, dependent status of -X3 (in relation to a partly corrupt “three ellipticals” subculture), he may be simply telling us what they want us to hear.

The truth may be that some populations like the “three ellipticals” subculture never quite learn how to reduce their numbers as other aliens might wish they would. Instead, they may prefer both a sexual and non-sexual, mixed strategy, and may assume that the universe can be recycled in ways that are more gradual, yet may seem precipitous from our relatively primitive perspective on astrophysics.

Since 2005, other hyperversals have suggested that the universe is recycled via a continuous dynamic that it involves rigorous ecological considerations. In our case, by the time we merge with Andromeda some 3.5 billion years hence, we’ll be starkly different (probably of mixed alien composition) and will both map and model the “visible” universe differently.

Our sense of vision will be remotely hyperspatial, as will our understanding of dark energy phenomena, black holes and more. Humans are already developing remote sensitivities of the sort.

Hyperversals who are more advanced than -X3’s associates pose a hopeful prospect, given that some of -X3’s cohorts don’t seem to have a comprehensive grasp of some aspects of the universal dilemma at this stage in their evolution.

* If other “three ellipticals” hyperversals have better models and understandings, they either aren’t sharing them with us or they rely on what, to us, seems to be another faction to do so.
 

Despite corruption in places like “three ellipticals” and Verdant subcultures, social evolution proceeds over time.

From (what is posed as) a hard-line perspective of “three ellipticals” populations, only dominance hierarchies and strict manipulations can achieve a universal ecology. From the perspective of other, sometimes independent or variously aggregated hyperversals, the universe may sometimes be viewed in more cooperative, legalistic terms (transparent agreements between communities).

Deeper interactions and shared ecology lead to larger conventions over time. So, even if some hyperversal populations fail to manage their numbers proportionately, all aliens must evolve and participate in universal conventions.

There are limits on everyone.   

Back to Contents