from NewDawnMagazine Website
Alan Alford, the author of Gods of The New Millennium (1997) is one of the world's foremost advocates of Interventionism - the theory that mankind was genetically created by flesh-and-blood "gods".
In this article, originally published in
Sightings Magazine (UK), he expands on the work of
to present an account of what happened in the Garden of Eden.
The shocking conclusion is
that man was a genetic hybrid, created and manipulated not by God,
but by flesh-and-blood, walking, talking 'gods'.
However, such an idea did not present any problems to the world's first known civilization - the Sumerians - who lived alongside these divine rulers and depicted them as human-like beings.
The Sumerian scribes
and their Akkadian successors inscribed clay tablets with a wealth
of information about the gods. One such text, commonly known by the
name of its hero,
Atra-Hasis, describes the background to the
creation of man, when the gods themselves were involved in the
painstaking extraction of minerals from Earth:
The ensuing passages of the Atra-Hasis describe what appears to a modern-day reader as a cloning process, in which the goddess Nin-ti ('Lady Life') made fourteen pieces of 'clay' and impregnated fourteen 'birth goddesses'.
The first slaves comprised seven males and seven females, referred to as LU.LU - a term indicating a genetic mixture between the primitive hominid Homo erectus and the gods themselves.
The event can be dated to around 200,000 years ago
when the large-brained Homo sapiens suddenly appeared on this
In order to understand what happened there, it is
necessary to appreciate that the word Eden is derived from the
Sumerian term E.DIN. Whilst the first syllable 'E' meant 'Home', the
second syllable was an abbreviation of DIN.GIR, commonly translated
as 'the gods'. Eden or E.DIN was therefore the 'Abode of the Gods'.
Enlil, described in the following text as 'the Lord', reacted accordingly:
This raid on the
Black-headed slaves is also mentioned briefly in the Old Testament,
Genesis 2:7-8, where man rather curiously had already been formed
when he was 'put' in the Garden of Eden by 'God'.
The first clue is that God himself
is described as one of the walking talking gods. The second clue is
the presence of the Serpent - a well-known symbol for the ancient
Egyptian gods, and particularly Enki himself, the genetic scientist
who had created man. It is no coincidence that the modern symbol of
medicine is a serpent entwined around a staff.
The Old Testament suggests that this change was caused by the consumption of a 'fruit'. This is a significant detail because, according to the scenario outlined so far, man was created by the gods as a hybrid creature, and hybrids are nearly always born sterile.
The tale of
sexual knowledge being granted in the Garden of Eden therefore
carries a distinct ring of truth.
As mentioned earlier, the Serpent god was Enki, the genetic scientist of the gods, and the 'fruit' with which he tempted Eve would thus seem to symbolize a deliberate genetic intervention by him.
However, in order to confirm our suspicions, we must first address the questions of motive and opportunity, and we must produce a solid scientific hypothesis on how such a genetic change could have been introduced. The background provided so far provides all but one of the clues we need to reconstruct the event.
piece which solves the puzzle is the mysterious 'Tree of Life' in
the Garden of Eden.
Only then did the Lord God say:
The answer is amazingly simple.
Originally mankind was designed as a slave workforce which could be
easily controlled, and his sterility was an essential control
mechanism. However, with the granting of sexual knowledge to Adam
and Eve, man acquired the means to independent reproduction. The
longevity offered by the Tree of Life thus changed from an asset to
a liability, creating a serious risk of an out-of-control population
As explained in Gods of the New Millennium, the primary factor behind the alleged immortality of the gods was almost certainly a genetic inheritance, as evidenced by the male gods' obsession with marrying their half-sisters. Such a genetic longevity is indeed being sought in the laboratory today. Scientists at the Geron Corporation in America are confident that they can prolong the life of human cells by manipulating the telomeres on the end of the chromosomes.
Furthermore, a genome which was artificially enhanced in this way
would make perfect sense for a species which was attempting to
overcome the time barriers to inter-stellar travel.
periods once seemed incredible, but are now scientifically
plausible, based on the assumption that man was indeed created in
the gods' image, genetically-speaking. Today's average life span of
three score years and ten is the inevitable result of the
reproductive orgy and genetic mutations which followed the events in
Enki's motive presents
us with no problem, other than denting our proud human heritage, for
it would seem that his gift of sexual knowledge was simply a
spiteful trick on his brother Enlil. Following the raid on the slave
camps, mentioned earlier, we can safely surmise that Enki was more
than a little upset with his brother, and was awaiting a suitable
opportunity for revenge.
The birth of Adam and Eve would thus have appeared perfectly normal, and they would have happily spent their childhood days playing in 'the Garden' (or more likely a secure wing of the hospital facility). Then one day the sex genes kicked in (as they do) and the two pubescent children suddenly realized that they were naked.
When Enlil saw them hiding with
embarrassment, he immediately realized the genetic trick which had
been played on him, and the rest is history - the serpent was cursed
and the blameless Adam and Eve were expelled.
The alleged intervention by so-called gods is now supported by a scientifically plausible scenario, which involves two different Edens and two separate genetic creations. It is hardly surprising that the editors of the Bible were extremely confused, and their confusion has handed the Darwinists a walkover victory in the debate on mankind's origins.
But, whilst these mainstream scientists hunt in vain for mankind's 'missing links', interventionist scientists are engaged in a different search which has shattering implications for the new millennium - a search for mankind's 'missing gods'.