Francis is making it easier for ambitious 
				people to value simplicity
				 
				
				The hardest task for a top leader, 
				religious or otherwise, is to pass up any of the swag bags and 
				perks of high office. 
				 
				
				Enter Francis, who
				
				declined to live in the 
				luxurious papal suite in order to remain in the relatively 
				humbler Vatican guesthouse, and who chooses simple garments over 
				ornate ones.
				 
				
				Francis might have seemed a bit 
				naïve or quaint if he’d poped a generation or two ago, back when 
				society worried less about environmental limits or 
				sustainability. But millennials today are gripped by doubts 
				about whether they can live at the posh levels of past 
				generations, as well as suspicions that the ways of the past 
				aren’t sustainable. 
				 
				
				This pope will inspire them to make 
				an impact that goes beyond having nice possessions.
				 
				 
				
				Francis is changing how we distinguish 
				between "important people" and "unimportant" ones
				 
				
				While a Billy Graham seemed 
				to take special pride in counseling presidents within the 
				splendid halls of power, Francis has made a career of quietly 
				heading out to slums in order to care for marginalized people. 
				
				 
				
				And, strikingly, he asks those 
				people to pray for him, which is a subtle but powerful 
				reminder that the people at society’s margins too have something 
				meaningful to give.
				 
				 
				
				Francis is reintroducing a healthy tension 
				between the concept of virtue and the practice of capitalism
				 
				
				Just google up "Francis and 
				antichrist," and you’ll get some fascinating "proofs" that the 
				pope has 666 tattooed somewhere on his body. In fact, 
				Francis is more the anti-Ayn Rand, the polar opposite of that 
				uber-capitalist who blamed the poor for their own misfortune.
				 
				
				I
				
				wrote a few days ago about the 
				conundrum that arises when Christian belief come into contact 
				with aggressive capitalism. Francis goes so far as to say that 
				excessive admiration for capitalism can be a kind of idolatry, a 
				worshipping of the golden calf.
				 
				
				Granted, Francis’ pronouncements on 
				capitalism may be imperfect or incomplete or misguided in the 
				minds of some. 
				 
				
				Still, he is the first global 
				religious leader in maybe centuries to bring up the elephant in 
				the room, which is the tension between the
				
				Ayn Rand school of economics 
				and the great world religions such as Christianity.
				 
				 
				
				Francis is drawing a dividing line between 
				high status and good character
				 
				
				The photos of Francis clasping, 
				kissing and blessing a disfigured man caused a
				
				global stir this past November.
				 
				
				We’ve seen many people be pope or 
				priest or politician - but we’ve seen few use their power in a 
				more humanizing manner. 
				
					
					"Character is destiny," 
					Heraclitus said. 
				
				
				And in that moment, Francis 
				exemplified a manner of character that most of us admire but 
				which few of us could match.
				 
				
				Such displays of character make 
				critics treat him with far greater respect than they otherwise 
				would. And it is such displays of character that will remind 
				Catholics, non-Catholics, agnostics and atheists alike that 
				power and position aren’t ends in themselves. 
				 
				
				Rather, power and position are means 
				for displaying virtue and character.
				 
				 
				
				Francis is building a path for civil 
				discussion of our worst hot-button issues
				 
				
				For the moment, at least, it’s good 
				to be pope. Francis has managed to make himself the darling of 
				some progressives. 
				 
				
				Still, expect the honeymoon to end 
				soon enough, and for Francis to come increasingly
				
				under fire by progressives as 
				they realize he will not go as far as they would hope on issues 
				such as gender and sex. 
				 
				
				Meanwhile, Francis has already been
				
				pilloried by Rush Limbaugh 
				and others on the right for being a Marxist in shepherd’s robing.
				 
				
				Our times are ridiculously 
				contentious. Conservatives bristle at how Francis states the 
				Occupy movement’s case with greater eloquence than that movement 
				itself could muster. 
				 
				
				And many progressives grouse about 
				how the Catholic church is
				
				the same old church despite its 
				new tone.
				 
				
				Still, Francis should manage to 
				unite liberals and conservatives in some meaningful way.  Both 
				may come to understand that Francis is motivated by loftier and 
				more complex values than black-and-white partisanship.
				 
				
				In that case, a more civil tone 
				would finally be possible in our hopelessly gridlocked 
				democratic societies. 
				 
				
				And that may well become Francis’ 
				greatest contribution of all.