O Villain! thou hast stolen both mine office and my name.
To those unacquainted with the power and scope of secret societies,
the personality of Pope Paul VI presents a veritable enigma. No
other Pope, even in the most tempestuous times, has been the subject
of such conflicting reports; no other Pope has been so apparently
self-contradictory. Even a casual reading of his reign leaves an
impression of doubt, equivocation, and a pathetically weak kind of
hedging that is a far remove from the assertive Pontificates of the
For how can one account for a Pope lamenting, as Paul did, that ‘one
can no longer trust the Church’? He signed the documents that kept
Vatican Two on course, and promised, almost in the early hours of
his reign, to consolidate and implement its decisions. Yet he
changed his tune even before the last of its sessions.
have believed the Council would have brought sunny days for the
Church’s history. On the contrary, they are days of storm, cloud,
and fog. How did this come about?’
And the answer he provided:
‘We think there has been the influence
of a hostile Power. His name is the Devil’
– tempts one to ask
whether that was a form of confession, a self-indictment. Was he
merely expressing what he knew had become fact, or speaking as a
victim, a disillusioned man in the grip of forces beyond his
Compare his judgments with those of almost any of his predecessors,
a Pius V, a Leo XIII, and the contrast appears to be, as I said
before, quite pitiful. To quote but two instances. On 14 September,
1972, he came down heavily against the suggestion that women might
play some part in the ministry of the priesthood.
Such a departure
from custom was unthinkable. Yet his was not a decisive voice, for
only some three weeks later the Vatican issued a hand-out to
journalists announcing that the Pope might change his mind. The
final contradiction came on 29 March, 1973, when the Associated
‘Pope Paul ruled today that women, regardless of
whether they are nuns, may distribute Communion in Roman Catholic
The Pope had already, in May 1969, condemned a new departure that
had crept in whereby Communion was received in the hand. Yet later
he took that stricture back, with the meaningless proviso that
Communion bread could be so received ‘after proper instruction.’
His weakness, his yielding to innovation in ritual and practice,
together with the acceptance of revolutionary Marxism, and the many
strange rumours that issued, from time to time, from the Vatican,
caused many people in more than one part of the world to wonder if
they were indeed witnessing the fall of Rome.
It was said that the Pope’s correspondence, before it reached him,
passed through the hands of Casaroli, Villot, and Benelli,
Cardinals in virtual control of the Vatican. Statesmen and churchmen
who paid official visits found Pope Paul diffident, almost vague,
and more ready with comments and opinions than with definite
answers. He lacked clarity; and as wonder gave way to a feeling of
disquiet, various theories emerged to account for the air of mystery
around Peter’s Chair.
Cardinal Agostino Casaroli Cardinal
Cardinal Giovanni Benelli
The most feasible one, that Paul was an anti-pope, a trained
Communist infiltrator, could be supported by his known past, his
friendship with the anarchist Alinsky and others of his kind in
Milan, and the heresies he had fostered since coming to power.
Other explanations will be advanced here (not because they figure
among the beliefs of the present writer, who regards them as
extravagant, some wildly so), but in order to make known what many
intelligent people have come to think in the face of a situation
akin to those, in centuries past, when the forces of St. Michael and
Asmodeus clashed by the banks of the Tiber.
One theory is that Paul VI, a good Pope in the normal sense, fell
into the hands of agents of secret societies (and here the names of Villot, Casaroli, and Benelli crop up again) who drugged him,
injected poison into his veins, and made him incapable of reasoning,
so that all that purported to be stamped by the magisterium of the
Church came, in reality, from the triumvirate of Cardinals.
But that would seem to be ruled out by Montini’s life-long
attachment to Marxism, which would have obviated the need for the
Left orientated secret societies to exert any pressure upon him.
That would have been superfluous. Though there was one utterance by
the Pope, when a dignitary asked him to quieten the widespread
alarm, that might have been taken as indicative:
‘Do you people
believe the Pope to be badly informed, or subject to pressure?’
At length stories emanating from Rome of sacrilege and abuses
committed in church, with the approval of the Pope, became so
startling, that groups of people in Europe and America decided to
This culminated in a Mr. Daniel Scallen of the Marian Press in
Georgetown, Ontario, Canada, employing the Pinkerton Detective
Agency in New York to investigate. One of the agency’s detectives
was sent, in 1973, to Rome, and he returned with a story that
dwarfed all other speculations, however sensational.
He had determined that there were two Popes living in the Vatican,
Paul VI and an impostor who had been made to resemble Montini with
the aid of plastic surgery. Several such operations were necessary,
and when colour photographs of the false Pope were sent to
interested circles in Munich, where the imposture is still receiving
concentrated study, there were certain noticeable differences in the
two sets of features that could not be overcome.
To point out the differences: Montini had clear blue eyes, large,
and being long-sighted he only required glasses for near viewing.
The impostor had green eyes, small, and he wore glasses with thick
lenses on all occasions.
Montini’s photographs reveal a small mole, or birth-mark, between
the left eye and the left ear. This does not appear in photographs
of the impostor, whose left eyebrow was nearer to the eye than was
The differences between the nose and the ears of the two men are
held to be decisive. Montini’s nose was Roman, and
protruded somewhat over his mouth. The impostor’s nose, part
straight and part hooked, was short, and those who subjected the
photographs to professional examination claim to have detected the
insertion of a plastic strip in the nose to make it appear more
But it is differences in the shape and formation of the ears that
present the greatest difficulty to those who doubt the existence of
an impostor. Such differences are unique, individual, and they are
treated the same as finger-prints in courts of law. Any comparison
of the lobes and build of the ears, as revealed by photographs,
becomes not a little impressive.
But the interested circles did not stop there. They turned their
attention upon the voice, and called in the help of the Type B-65
Kay Elemetrics of Pine Brook, New Jersey, and the Ball Telephone
Company. Their object was to analyze the voice (or voices, if there
were indeed two popes) when they pronounced the traditional Easter
Sunday and Christmas Day blessing, with the words Indulgentium
Peccatorum, spoken from the Vatican in 1975.
On both occasions the message was broadcast over Rome, and many
people taped it; and it appeared, according to sonograms that were
made – and sonograms are more sensitive than the ear – that the man
who had spoken at Easter, and again at Christmas, had not been one
and the same. There had been two different speakers.
Here I quote from those who are qualified to judge the sonograms and
sum up the distinctions:
One voice had a much lower pitch than the other, with a more
pronounced dragging of word syllables.
Another difference was that one voice had a much lower range of
frequencies. It emitted a more hissing sound, and was noticeably
These graphs were submitted to the FBI for examination, and the same
conclusions were arrived at. The voice patterns were different, and
indicated that the vocal chords, the mouth, and the lips, were
unique to each individual.
Subsequent statements alleging that there was a false Pope Paul VI,
go on to say that he was an actor whose initials are P.A.R., and
that it was he who died at Castelgandolfo on 6 August, 1978. A
German Bishop, who claims to have proof that Montini was last known
to be living not in the Vatican but in the outskirts of Rome, hopes
to make this public in a forthcoming book.
So could this point to the fact that the genuine Paul VI was held
captive in the Vatican, or that he was kidnapped, perhaps murdered?
A layman in search of more concrete evidence went to Brescia, where
some of Montini’s relations were living. There a niece informed him
that they were perfectly well aware of the imposture, but that all
their efforts to make it known had been stifled.
The investigator, who was obviously untried and filled with a
crusading zeal to bring things into the open, soon landed in
trouble. He was jailed for four years, and afterwards deported from
Italy. All efforts to trace his whereabouts since then have failed.
Well, as part of the prevailing confusion in the Roman stronghold,
that is what some far from negligible people have come to believe.
[Evidence for the above can be found at
below. The discerning reader will
not fail to distinguish between the actual evidence presented and
the authenticity or otherwise of the apparitions of Bayside - ed.]
Deception of the Century"
Paul VI: the Pope of 1972
One of the most startling revelations of Our Lady of the
Roses was the message concerning "the deception of the
century," in which an actor was substituted for Pope
Paul VI in certain public appearances beginning around
the year 1975. Sound incredible? There is an astonishing
amount of evidence for this claim: photos, voice prints,
testimonials of pilgrims in Rome who witnessed this fact
themselves, a reported exorcism in Switzerland, and Our
Lady of the Roses apparitions in New York.
Sister Lucy tried to warn Pope Paul VI
On May 13, 1967, after a Mass celebrated in front of the
basilica in Fatima, Portugal, Sister Lucy approached
Pope Paul VI and requested, "I want to have a private
conversation with you." She repeated this request many
times. Obviously, Sister Lucy had an important message
for him. But Pope Paul VI refused her request and
replied, "See, it is not the moment."
Sister Lucy withdrew. Pope Paul VI got up and turned
towards the statue of Our Lady of Fatima, trying to
place a silver Rosary between Her hands. As he could not
reach them, he deposited the Rosary at the statue's
The crowd shouted: "Lucia, Lucia, Lucia!" Then Bishop
Hnilica led Sister Lucy onto the front of the podium.
When the hundreds of thousands of pilgrims saw Sister
Lucy near the Pope, they applauded. But TV reporters and
hundreds of cameras recorded a stunning event: Sister
Lucy was crying. Why?
Pope Paul's plea for help
On June 29, 1972, Pope Paul VI stunned the world with
"From some fissure the
smoke of satan entered into the temple of God."
The Bayside message of
September 28, 1978 referred to Paul VI's statement:
“Listen to your Vicar
who stated that the smoke of satan had entered My
Church. Did he have pride when he brought this
knowledge to you? No! He asked for help. And what
did you do? You turned away and widened the door for
satan to enter!”
(September 28, 1978)
Pope Paul's plea went
unheeded and he entered into a martyrdom that would
endure for years.
Comparison of photographs: Pope Paul VI vs. the
Left, above - Pope Paul VI: Long nose,
reaching to the end of the ear lobe.
Right, above - the
impostor pope: Nose much shorter in comparison to ear.
Note the prominent
birthmark between the eye and ear of the true Pope (on
the left, 1973 photo) and conspicuously absent on the
impostor (right, 1977 photo). Notice the visible
difference in the nose. Pope Paul has a longer,
straighter, more pointed nose. The impostor has a
shorter and rounder nose.
Left - Pope Paul VI: Notice complete
difference of ear structure with that of the impostor.
Due to the tiny bone structure the ear is the hardest
thing to change in plastic surgery—this becomes obvious
in the two pictures.
Right - the impostor
pope: Notice not only the difference of the ear, but
also the shorter nose.
Left - Pope Paul VI: Long straight
nose—almost to the end of ear lobe. Ear is full and
Right - the impostor
pope: Nose is shorter and rounder—reaching only 3/4
length of ear. Ear is longer and not as wide.
(Note: Some have
conjectured that this "actor of great talent" was the
stage actor Parr.)
Voice prints (same exact words, different voice
Photos are only one type
of physical evidence to distinguish identity. Other
physical evidence includes fingerprints, voice-prints,
medical findings, etc. In his Umsturz im Vatikan? (An
Overthrow in the Vatican?), Kolberg presents
further evidence for the existence of the impostor pope.
Voice recordings of the
Latin "Urbi et Urbi" speech of "the Pope" were made on
two different occasions. The two recordings were passed
through a voice-frequency analyzer made by Kay
Elemetrics of Pine Brook, New Jersey. The output Type
B/65 sonagram voice prints of the same words pronounced
by the "the Pope" on two occasions shows that they they
were made by two different men.
The mysterious betrayal of Cardinal Mindszenty
The story surrounding the valiant shepherd, Cardinal
Mindszenty of Hungary (left in photo), adds another
dimension to the usurpation of Pope Paul VI's
pontificate. This saintly Cardinal suffered imprisonment
and torture in his home country of Hungary, speaking out
and trying to defend his flock first from Nazism and
then from the ravages of communism. In fact, Cardinal
Mindszenty suffered at the hands of the communists
tortures lasting 39 consecutive days and nights,
consisting of sleep-deprivation and every conceivable
In 1956, as communism
tightened its grip on the Church in Hungary, Cardinal
Mindszenty was given asylum at the American Embassy in
Budapest by President Eisenhower. The Cardinal
languished there for fifteen years, unable to leave the
building. Communist agents awaited him day and night, to
assassinate him should he leave the embassy.
On September 28, 1971 the world heard that Cardinal
Mindszenty had arrived in Rome at the invitation of Pope
Paul VI. He was received with real joy and tenderness by
Pope Paul. The Holy Father embraced Cardinal Mindszenty
and hung his own pectoral cross around his neck. They
both concelebrated Mass and the Holy Father spoke of the
Cardinal as "a guest we have awaited with longing ... a
symbol of unshakeable strength rooted in faith and in
selfless devotion to the Church."
On October 23, 1971 Pope Paul VI again concelebrated
Mass with Cardinal Mindszenty. Pope Paul gave Mindszenty
his own cardinal's mantle and told him in Latin,
"You are and remain
Archbishop of Esztergom and Primate of Hungary.
Continue working and if you have difficulties, turn
trustfully to us!"
The Cardinal returned to
his pastoral tours around the world. But on February 5,
1974, something unbelievable occurred: he received a
letter from the "Pope" declaring the See of Esztergom
vacant. The Vatican announced to the world that Cardinal
Mindszenty had "retired." The Vatican had lied to the
world in a public statement. In profound sorrow Cardinal
Mindszenty had to make clear that he had not abdicated,
but had been deposed. His Memoirs end with the words:
"This is how I arrived
at complete and total exile."
The Vatican was flooded
with protests and the free world's press attacked the
deposition of Cardinal Mindszenty with fury.
Exactly what did happen? How could Pope Paul VI have
betrayed his promise to Cardinal Mindszenty? Did
Pope Paul VI really depose Cardinal Mindszenty on
February 5, 1974? This is extremely unlikely, in light
of a message given on August 21, 1974 (the "V" in
the quote below represents Cardinal Villot, the
Secretariat of State):
"V does much
damage to the Holy Father by changing his
correspondence. V rewrites his letters. V
censors his mail."
- August 21, 1974
Was the letter sent to
Cardinal Mindszenty on February 5, 1974 written by
Cardinal Villot? Considering Pope Paul VI's
tremendous support of Cardinal Mindszenty and his
promise in 1971, this explanation would fit with Our
Lady of the Roses message, and the real Third Secret.
Pope Paul VI was drugged
We also know that between 1971 (when Pope Paul met with
Cardinal Mindszenty in Rome) and 1974, a lot had
taken place. In the April 14, 1973 and September 27,
1975 messages, it was revealed that Pope Paul was being
Veronica - Now I am...
Our Lady is taking me into a bedroom. Oh! I see
sisters—they're nurses—in the bedroom. Oh, and
there—I can see him in his bed—is the Holy Father.
The nurse now has a needle, and she's rolling up now
the sleeve. He has on... it looks like a robe, the
Holy Father, and she's giving him a needle in his
arm. He... and he looks very sick. Now the needle
was placed into his left arm, into his left arm. Now
as the needle is placed into his left arm, Pope Paul
is reaching over onto a table near his bed. He's
reaching for his crucifix. He's placing it across
(April 14, 1973)
"Medication of evil has dulled the brain of the true
Pope, Pope Paul VI. They send into his veins poison,
to dull his reasoning and paralyze his legs."
(Our Lady, September
It appears that
Cardinal Mindszenty's betrayal is one of many
mysteries explained by the overthrow of Pope Paul VI's
Paul VI died August 6, 1978, at the age of 80.
Back to Contents