effect, as it has come to be called, has been studied mathematically and it
poses major problems for weather prediction. It states that very small
changes in the starting conditions of a model will result in very big
changes later. Effectively, it places a limit on the number of days into the
future one can predict the weather. Scientists now believe that we will
never be able to predict the weather more than a few weeks into the future.
Hughes went on to state that the super-rotation of the Earth affected the average satellite’s orbit by about 0.l degree during its life time. Since the effect is so small, it is difficult to monitor the short term behavior of the super-rotating atmosphere. Remember that no one knows why the Venusian atmosphere super-rotates. Hughes theorized about some of the possible causes of super-rotation and ended up discounting them all. Hughes concludes:
The super-rotation of the Earth’s atmosphere is nowhere near as great as the
effect which occurs on Venus. If the Venusian super-rotation can be
explained by way of a Hollow Planet with very large Polar Holes, I wonder if
the same is not true for the Earth? The lesser super-rotation on the Earth
suggests to me that the Polar Holes here on Earth may be smaller. The
principle of the ‘pumping-action’ which I suggested for Venus might apply
here on Earth. The faster rotation of the Earth may also result in an
atmosphere which has far more energy and which overrides a large part of the
effect of the super-rotation. Let me point out too that the jet stream
circles the Earth’s polar regions. The jet stream is a very powerful ‘river’
of air which also super-rotates about the Earth. Could it be that the
stream derives some of its power from air flowing into and out of a
The only way I can see this as a viable possibility is if there is a hole in the crust of a Hollow Earth which allows air to flow into and out of the planet. Perhaps a mechanism exists whereby a central Sun could flare up and cause a pressure wave which travels all the way from the inside of the planet to the outside. What if a central Sun were to bend magnetic lines of force on the outside of the Earth, thereby triggering an aurora while at the same time triggering a powerful pressure wave of air which would slowly travel to the outer atmosphere? Thus one would first see an aurora and then some time later (hours or days later), the physical pressure wave might arrive.
(Several other examples of observations and experiments linking aurora
activity with weather are given which have been omitted here.) As can be
seen from the above, many observers have noted a possible link between
storms, winds and clouds – all possibly related to the
aurora. All of these
observations are impossible in the light of modern-day auroral theory.
Von Humboldt called them ‘polar bands’. (Once again several observations are cited.) The above examples illustrate a number of interlinked facts which have no right to be linked – at least according to our science as it stands now. We find certain types of cloud emanating from north and north-west of England and Europe. Most of the data suggests that from the British Isles the point of origin lies somewhere in the vicinity of Greenland – or beyond. As seen from South Africa, the clouds seem to originate more or less from the South Pole.
As seen from the Indian Ocean the suggestion is a line lying towards Alaska, or further on, somewhere in the vicinity of Greenland. From an American point of view one can conclude that these clouds do not seem to coincide with the magnetic meridian. So one has a phenomenon which coincides with the magnetic meridian most, but not all of the time. Also, there is no reasonable scientific explanation for:
Weather From Inside the Earth?
Wollin’s first amazingly successful freak weather prediction had taken place in January 1986. He had asked Al Travis of the Fredericksburg Magnetic Observatory to report any sudden changes in the magnetic field to him. On 22 January 1986 Travis phone him and told him that the instruments had shown a sudden jump in the horizontal component of the Earth’s geomagnetic field. Wollin then told him that this meant a major snowstorm or flood would occur in 6 days. Wollin then phoned TV stations the region telling them what he expected to happen. The weathermen countered by saying that there was nothing unusual forecast.
Their satellite picture and weather charts showed
no indication of any impending storm. They turned down Wollin’s requests to
mention his prediction along with theirs. A freak storm struck between 25 –
28 January. 100 mm of rain fell in the coastal region between Boston and
Washington, D.C., while 40 inches of show fell inland. Goesta Wollin’s
prediction had come true. The storm caused considerable damage to property
and several people were killed.
He studied the record for February 1983. On 4
February 1983 the magnetic recorder had oscillated wildly. Then there was a
dip when another freak storm broke. A similar event occurred in 1985. The
sad events of October – November 1985 convinced Wollin that he really was
onto something. A sudden storm had resulted in a flood which caused the
deaths of 39 people. Wollin found that the magnetic trace for the 2-1/2 days
leading up to this storm matched exactly that of the storm in 1967. This
could not be a coincidence. Wollin wanted to try to make an accurate
prediction based on his theory. It was then that he elicited the help of Al
Travis. As I mentioned earlier, this led to the successful prediction of a
freak storm 3 days later.
If this were the case, then surely scientists would have noticed it by now. I would guess that Wollin’s discovery is only valid for North America. Why? I find myself coming back to the possibility of a coupling between the activity of a central Sun and that of the Sun. Could it be that activity on the Sun communicates itself to a central Sun by way of the magnetic field? Could such a central Sun then flare up in sympathy by producing more heat as well as a sudden shock-wave? This shock-wave would then transmit itself from the centre of the Earth to a region nearby on the outer surface.
This would explain the time delay which Wollin observed. That time was relatively fixed, thereby suggesting that a fixed distance is involved in the transmission of this shock wave. The key as Wollin observed was not the intensity of activity but its rate of change. This might indicate that freak weather storms are caused only by a sudden shock wave. A more gentle change in intensity would not produce an atmospheric shock wave. This would be consistent with the Alaskan weather data. It would mean that shock waves originating from the core of the Earth are capable of affecting Alaskan weather.
Since it seems to affect Alaska, but not Europe or Britain, could
we infer then that a Polar Hole in the Earth’s crust lies near Alaska? Could
it be that the water vapor in the air which caused the storms on the east
coast actually originated inside an Inner Earth? It is worth noting that on
22 January 1986 there was absolutely no evidence whatsoever on the weather
charts of an impending storm. Could that be because the factors which were
about to cause the storm actually lay beneath the surface of the Earth at
The link between solar flares and the
rising atmosphere seems to have been badly known at the time – or the extent
of it seemed unappreciated. Of course a rising and falling atmosphere is
very strange on a solid world. How can the atmosphere suddenly rise? Will an
influx of charged particles which heat the upper layers of the atmosphere
really be enough to cause this tremendous swelling? In considering the
circumstantial connection between solar flares and the magnetic field I have
wondered whether a central Sun’s activities could result in an outpouring of
energy in sympathy with the Sun. Perhaps such outpourings cause a high
pressure zone inside the planet which then causes air to pour out of the
Polar Holes and for the outer atmosphere to then swell. Perhaps such events
also cause the high pressure over Alaska and North America.
suddenly many cubic miles of air might be sucked into the Earth changing
atmospheric pressures and wind. Similarly, many cubic miles of air might be
forced out at other times. The scientists also found that at times their
models were incredibly accurate. On occasion they could predict the weather
almost for a month in advance. If butterfly wings had the affect attributed
to them, then this would have been impossible. Perhaps the atmosphere really
is far more stable and predictable than scientists have realized. Perhaps,
when one knows all the facts, weather prediction can leap forward in many