by Zachary Stieber

July 18, 2025

from TheEpochTimes Website

Article also HERE

 

 

 

 

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

testifies on Capitol Hill on May 14, 2025.

Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times

 

 


Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

and Secretary of State Marco Rubio

announced the move...

 



The Trump administration said on July 18 that the United States is rejecting a World Health Organization (WHO) agreement that it says gives the global health body too much power.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the formal rejection of the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).

"Nations who accept the new regulations are signing over their power in health emergencies to an unelected international organization that could order lockdowns, travel restrictions, or any other measures that it sees fit," Kennedy said in a video statement.

 

"In fact, it doesn't even need to declare an emergency."

 

 

Video also HERE...

 

 

The amendments to the regulations included introducing a new term - a 'pandemic' emergency - that would trigger certain actions to respond to a 'pandemic' or events that could become a 'pandemic'.


The WHO said after they were approved in 2024 by member countries - including the United States - that the amendments would,

"strengthen global preparedness, surveillance and responses to public health emergencies, including pandemics."

According to U.S. officials, there was a deadline this month to reject the amendments, or they would have become binding on the United States, even though the country withdrew from the WHO earlier this year at President Donald Trump's direction.


Rubio and Kennedy said in a joint statement that the amendments compel countries to adopt digital health documents and elevate political issues such as solidarity, rather than take quick and effective action.

"Our Agencies have been and will continue to be clear: we will put Americans first in all our actions, and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy, or personal liberties," they said.

 

"These amendments risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy."

WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus wrote on X on July 18 that,

'countries have the right to decide whether or not to adopt the IHR amendments and that the organization regretted the decision by U.S. officials not to adopt them.'

He also said that the amendments,

"are not about empowering WHO, but about improving cooperation among Member States in the next 'pandemic'."

Some members of Congress praised the development.

"The United States will not allow the WHO to use public health emergencies to devastate our nation.

 

I fully support the Trump administration's decision to reject the IHR amendments," Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said in a statement.


"The United States must never cede our sovereignty to any international entity or organization.

 

I applaud Secretary Kennedy and Secretary Rubio for rejecting the World Health Organization's ill-advised International Health Regulations amendments," Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) said.

Lawrence Gostin, of the WHO Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law, wrote on X that the set of regulations,

"facilitates rapid detection and response... promotes accurate info and protects civil liberties, and it certainly does not affect US sovereignty."

The IHR was introduced in 2005 as the successor to international sanitary regulations that had been in place since 1951.

When the WHO approved the amendments in 2024, members also agreed to keep negotiating a 'pandemic' agreement.
 

Members in May approved a 'pandemic' agreement that states in part that,

countries shall take steps to prepare for future pandemics, including improving vaccine coverage...

The United States did not participate in the final stages of negotiations for the accord because they were held after the country withdrew from the WHO.

Trump's executive order directing,

 "will have no binding force on the United States."