by Emel Akan
August 04, 2025
from TheEpochTimes ebsite
Article also HERE





Illustration

by The Epoch Times



Trump is leveraging tariffs

to broker peace, restructure global trade,

and secure concessions from

U.S. allies and rivals...

 



WASHINGTON

 

In his second term, President Donald Trump has reshaped U.S. foreign policy,

using tariffs not just as economic leverage but as a central tool of diplomacy...

His administration has leveraged economic pressure to address global conflicts and secure concessions from other nations, marking one of the most significant shifts in U.S. foreign policy in decades.


Just months after taking office, Trump made clear of his ambitions, stating that his second term would be very different from his first.

"The first time, I had two things to do - run the country and survive; I had all these crooked guys. And the second time, I run the country and the world," he told The Atlantic in an April interview.

Trump has touted how his tariff strategy - resulting in trade concessions from allies such as the European Union and South Korea, along with breakthroughs in conflicts - is evidence that the new foreign policy approach is delivering results.


His trade threats have already helped end several conflicts, including the recent border skirmish between Thailand and Cambodia and the crisis between India and Pakistan.

On June 27, Trump hosted the foreign ministers of the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda to the White House as they signed a peace deal to end their 30-year war.

Michael Walsh, senior fellow in the Africa program at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, said the White House has demonstrated that it can promote regional stability through economic incentives.

"They believe very strongly that if you can show countries that they have an economic incentive to not fight with one another and to work with one another and work with the United States, that you can resolve a lot of conflicts in the world," Walsh told The Epoch Times.

Walsh said Trump's approach in Africa, which prioritizes trade over aid, has been more effective than the strategy pursued by former administrations.


The Trump administration is continuing its engagement in Africa, now turning its attention to conflict in Sudan, which is often labeled the "forgotten war," in which an estimated 150,000 people have died, according to data reported by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
 

Although no breakthrough has been achieved so far, Walsh said Sudan and other parts of Africa remain a priority for U.S. peace efforts.

 


U.S. President Donald Trump holds a photo as he meets with

Minister of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Rwanda Olivier Nduhungirehe

and the Foreign Minister of the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Thérèse Kayikwamba Wagner

in the Oval Office on June 27, 2025.

The meeting followed a peace deal brokered by the White House

and signed by officials from both nations to end the conflict in eastern Congo.

The administration is seeking to utilize economic incentives

to help foster regional stability.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images





Tariffs may Weaken Russia, BRICS

Most recently, Trump is pressuring China and India to stop purchasing sanctioned Russian oil as part of his effort to weaken the Kremlin and end its war in Ukraine.


On Aug. 1, Trump took to Truth Social to criticize Moscow over the rising death toll in both Russia and Ukraine.

"This is a War that should have never happened," he wrote.

 

"I'm just here to see if I can stop it!"

The Trump administration is leveraging tariffs in negotiations with China and India to isolate Russia, according to Chris Tang, a professor at UCLA's Anderson School of Management,

who described the development as "a very interesting dynamic."


If the strategy succeeds, it could drive Russia into economic collapse, he told The Epoch Times.

Last month, Trump also targeted the BRICS alliance - led by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa - warning against their efforts to challenge the U.S. dollar's global dominance.

"Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10 percent Tariff.

 

There will be no exceptions to this policy," he stated on Truth Social.



A serviceman with Ukraine's 24th Mechanized Brigade

 fires a howitzer at Russian forces near Chasiv Yar, Ukraine, on Nov. 18, 2024.

President Donald Trump has begun pressuring China and India

to stop buying sanctioned Russian oil in an effort to end the Kremlin's war in Ukraine.

Oleg Petrasiuk/24th King Danylo Separate Mechanized Brigade

of the Ukrainian Armed Forces/File Photo/Handout via Reuters



In February, just weeks into his second term, Trump imposed 25 percent tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico, and added a 10 percent levy on Chinese imports, to pressure these countries to address fentanyl trafficking.


Most recently, he threatened Brazil with a 50 percent tariff on its exports to the United States, sharing on Truth Social a letter to Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

 

In the letter, Trump accused Brazil of becoming an "international disgrace" due to the ongoing trial of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close Trump ally.


Trump's tariff strategy is already showing results. In June, Canada backed off its plan to implement a 3 percent digital services tax on large tech firms after Trump halted trade talks and threatened to impose higher tariffs on Canadian imports.


The U.S. government has collected more than $150 billion in tariff revenue over the past six months, according to the White House.

The Congressional Budget Office in June projected that figure could grow to $2.8 trillion over the next decade...

Keith Krach, who served as under secretary of State for economic growth, energy and the environment in the first Trump administration, said Trump is using tariffs as a broader strategy to rewire global trade and secure America's dominance on the world stage.

"President Trump has always viewed tariffs as a strategic tool," Krach told The Epoch Times.

 

"In his first term, he used them like a scalpel - targeting steel, aluminum, and specific trade gaps. Now, tariffs are the linchpin of his economic statecraft."




Key Concessions

Many analysts argue that the strength of Trump's tariff strategy stems from America's economic and military power.

As the world's largest economy and consumer market, the United States can exert pressure in a way that others can't.

This leverage was evident in recent negotiations with the European Union.

 

While Trump initially proposed a 30 percent tariff, the EU ultimately agreed to a 15 percent rate, still a sharp rise from the previous average of 4.8 percent, according to World Trade Organization data.

 

The White House said the new tariffs on European goods would,

"generate tens of billions of dollars in revenue annually."

In addition, the bloc agreed to invest $600 billion in the United States over the course of Trump's term and purchase $750 billion of U.S. energy exports over three years.

 


U.S. President Donald Trump

and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen

shake hands after reaching a trade deal,

at the Trump Turnberry golf course

 in Turnberry, Scotland, on July 27, 2025.

Under the deal, the United States

will impose 15 percent tariffs on EU exports,

and the bloc will buy $750 billion in American energy

and invest $600 billion in the United States by 2028.

 Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo

 


U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called it,

"the deal of the century," and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called it "a huge deal."


"It will bring stability, it will bring predictability. That's very important for businesses on both sides of the Atlantic," von der Leyen said.

However, some other European leaders reacted strongly against the deal.


French Prime Minister François Bayrou stated on X that,

the trade deal was "a dark day" for the EU and a "submission" to Trump.

Marine Le Pen, the leader of France's right-wing National Rally party, condemned the agreement as a,

"political, economic, and moral fiasco."

Meanwhile, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz warned that,

"the German economy will suffer considerable damage as a result of these tariffs."

Japan similarly agreed to a 15 percent tariff and pledged $550 billion investment in the U.S. economy, with the United States set to receive 90 percent of the profits from those projects.


Under the latest deal with South Korea, exports to the United States will face a 15 percent tariff, while U.S. goods entering South Korea will be exempt from any tariffs.


In addition, Seoul committed to investing $350 billion in the United States and purchasing $100 billion worth of American liquefied natural gas, crude oil, and coal.


On July 31, Trump signed an executive order establishing reciprocal tariff rates for dozens of countries.

 

However, several nations, including Mexico, Canada, India, and China, have yet to finalize agreements with the Trump administration.


Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, said,

the administration has already secured trade deals with eight key trading partners, covering "about 55 percent of world GDP."

 


Kevin Hassett,

director of the White House National Economic Council,

 walks toward the West Wing at the White House on June 30, 2025.

Hassett said Beijing continues to fall short of its commitments

on rare-earth shipments, despite recent increases.

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images



These trade deals are largely settled, though there may still be some "dancing around the edges" on specific terms, Hassett told NBC News' "Meet the Press" on Aug. 3.


Countries that don't have finalized agreements, will soon face "reciprocal rates," with further negotiations expected to continue, he noted.


The Trump administration has also announced a new 40 percent tariff on transshipments, a tariff-avoidance tactic that primarily involves Chinese goods being minimally altered or simply relabeled in other countries and then sent to the United States.

 

The United States has already secured commitments from some countries, including Vietnam, to block the influx of cheap Chinese products into their markets for transshipment.


So far, this overhaul of U.S. tariff policy has not triggered broad retaliation from major trading partners, although the United States and China are still negotiating after tit-for-tat tariffs were paused.

"President Trump is seizing the moment to reset the rules of the game. I give him high marks. His strategy is already producing impressive results," Krach said.

 

"No one has exploited our generosity more than China."

Philip Luck, director of the economics program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said Trump has managed to roll out his strategy,

"without triggering widespread retaliation from trading partners."


"This success in avoiding retaliation likely stems from credible signaling of 'escalation dominance' - essentially convincing partners that entering a cycle of economic retaliation would be more costly for them than for the United States," Luck wrote in a recent report with Ina Simonovska.




Tariffs Reshape Supply Chains

Trump has long championed tariffs to revive American manufacturing and boost domestic jobs.

 

But according to Tang,

reshoring jobs to the country remains difficult after decades of industrial decline, a shortage of skilled labor, and ongoing infrastructure and regulatory hurdles.
 


An employee of Independent Can Company

works on the manufacturing line in Belcamp, Md., on June 25, 2025.

President Donald Trump has long championed tariffs

to revive American manufacturing and boost domestic jobs.

Experts warn that reshoring remains difficult after decades

of industrial decline, labor shortages, and regulatory challenges.

Ryan Collerd/AFP via Getty Images



Some companies are relocating production to the United States to avoid tariffs and serve the domestic market.

 

However, many still depend on cheaper overseas labor for international sales, creating a split in global supply chains.

"For domestic consumption goods, a lot of companies will gradually produce more in the United States," Tang said.

 

"But for the international market, the United States still relies on emerging markets with lower labor costs."

He cited Eli Lilly as an example, noting the pharmaceutical giant plans to produce more of its weight-loss drugs in the United States, because the domestic market is the largest.

"It makes sense for the company to produce here," Tang said.

Industries such as pharmaceuticals and semiconductors are leading the reshoring trend due to their highly automated production processes, which reduce labor needs.

 

Automakers such as Volkswagen are also ramping up their U.S. investment to avoid Trump's tariffs.

Still, bringing entire automotive supply chains to America remains a challenge.

Even with tariffs, high labor costs make countries like Mexico and China more attractive for some parts of the supply chain, Tang said.
 

Despite several recent trade wins, Trump still faces unresolved battles, including a new trade agreement and an ongoing standoff with China over rare-earth minerals.

 

While Chinese rare-earth shipments have surged in recent weeks, Beijing is still falling short of its commitments, according to Hassett.

"In the last month, there's been a big, big increase, but I think that we're all still hoping for more," Hassett told The Epoch Times on July 30.

White House officials continue to push for reducing U.S. dependence on processed rare earths from China by supporting domestic investments, but,

"it will take a few years to get there," Tang said.

 


Cargo containers sit stacked at the Port of Los Angeles

in San Pedro, Calif., on April 15, 2025.

The Trump administration faces ongoing trade disputes,

including tensions with China over rare-earth minerals,

as it pushes to reduce U.S. reliance on Chinese supply

through domestic investment.

Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images





Uncertainty Remains

While Trump has secured a series of trade victories, questions remain about their long-term durability.


Many of the tariff measures are based on executive authority and could be reversed by future administrations. Additionally, enforcement of major investment commitments by trading partners is still unclear.


One example is,

Trump's trade deal with the EU, which includes a pledge from Brussels to purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy over three years.

However, analysts are skeptical.

 

In 2024, U.S. energy exports to the EU totaled $78.5 billion - far below what would be needed to meet the commitment.


The bigger challenge, according to a recent report by investor and minerals researcher John Zadeh, is whether the United States can scale up exports to roughly $250 billion annually between 2025 and 2028.

"The critical limitation facing U.S. exporters isn't production capacity but rather export infrastructure," Zadeh explained.

 

"Particularly for natural gas, the process of liquefaction and marine terminal loading creates bottlenecks that cannot be quickly overcome, regardless of how much gas is produced domestically."

Von der Leyen backed the agreement, saying the EU would,

"replace Russian gas and oil with significant purchases of U.S. LNG, oil, and nuclear fuels."

Business leaders are also cautiously supportive of Trump's trade deals.

 

The Business Roundtable, an association of more than 200 CEOs of America's leading companies, praised Trump's efforts to restore balance in trade and support U.S. manufacturing, but warned of risks.

"We are concerned that persistent high tariff rates will harm the U.S. economy, especially the manufacturing sector," the group said, urging continued negotiations to lower tariffs and non-trade barriers.

Meanwhile, the market reaction to the 15 percent tariffs on key trading partners such as the EU and Japan has been largely muted. Investors have so far shrugged off concerns about the tariffs' potential impact on the U.S. economy and inflation.

 

The S&P 500 has rebounded more than 25 percent since its April 8 low, suggesting that markets may have initially overreacted to the April 2 unveiling of the tariffs.