by Kurt Nimmo
December 28, 2025
from GlobalResearch Website






Chancay megaport in Peru

while under construction.

Photo by rjankovsky via Adobe Stock,

used under the Standard license.

 

 

 

China's

commercial infrastructure investment

in Latin America

threatens the Trump Corollary

to the Monroe Doctrine...
 



In February, following Trump's successful effort to force Panama to withdraw from China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the administration set its sights on Peru and its
Chancay megaport.

 

The port facility, located 80 kilometers from Lima, the Peruvian capital, was constructed by China's COSCO Shipping at a cost of around $1.3 billion.

 

Chancay Port is considered China's flagship project in Latin America and it has a 60% stake in the port and exclusive operating rights.

 

Xi Jinping traveled to Peru in November, 2024 to inaugurate the port during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Leaders' Informal Meeting.

 

The Trump administration is said to view the "megaport with growing alarm."

"While Xi Jinping got the red carpet treatment, Biden was relegated to the back of the APEC leaders photo, clearly illustrating that the US had been replaced by China as a top ally.

 

The US did attempt to court Peru with some investment in infrastructure projects, like the construction of a spaceport in Piura, but such investments were unable to match the volume of investment offered by China," writes Adrian Aranda Alzamora.

The state-of-the-art deep-water Chancay Port is able to accommodate large cargo ships and this will impact international trade and shipping industries of the US, Mexico, and Central American countries, according to an analysis by Think China.

 

Zhu Feng, dean of the School of International Studies at Nanjing University, explained that,

the Trump administration views China's global investment in commercial infrastructure as a means of expanding its influence, which not only weakens US traditional control over certain regions but also encroaches on American business interests.

 

As a result, the US frames economic issues as security threats and labels China's economic and infrastructure investments in Latin America as geopolitical expansion.

China imports corn, copper, soy, beef, and lithium from Latin America, making it a primary trade partner and,

"eroding Washington's regional political clout, a trend that widened under Trump's 'America First' inward turn during his first administration and again under Biden."

China's trade with Peru, estimated at $16.3 billion, overshadows trade with the United States, according to UN Comtrade data.

 

China surpassed the US in trade with Peru during the first Trump administration and continued its dominance during the Biden years.

"This pattern of massive investment and trade has been observed in multiple countries of South America, but the extent of Chinese investment in the region can best be witnessed and understood in Peru," writes Alzamora.

In order to address this disparity, in mid-December Trump proposed designating Peru as a major non-NATO ally as part of his take on the Monroe Doctrine...

 

The administration sent a presidential message to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations informing Congress of his intention.

 

According to the message, the US and Peru have,

"shared security priorities, including regional stability, counternarcotics, and economic ties."

 

 

 

President Dina Boluarte - Subservient to the Neoliberal Order

 

 

Boluarte in 2024

(CC BY 2.0)

 

 

In October, protests rocked Peru in response to President José Jerí assuming power following the impeachment and removal of Dina Boluarte.

 

Jerí was accused of sexual assault, alleged illicit enrichment, and bribery.

 

The Public Prosecutor's Office dismissed the sexual assault case in August. Jerí is described as a conservative in favor of neoliberalism, deregulation, and private investment.

 

Boluarte traveled to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos in January,

"to signal her regime's unqualified subservience" to the in-coming Trump administration "and to offer unfettered exploitation of the country's natural resources to the big mining corporations and global finance capital."

President Boluarte was accused of colluding with the CIA.

 

The agency has a long and sordid history in Peru, including interference in the 1962 Peruvian general elections, facilitating a gun-running operation, and assisting the Peruvian Air Force in the "war on drugs."

 

Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen writes that the CIA,

not only wanted to deny the presidency to Peruvian nationalist Ollanta Humala, who was defeated in the presidential election [in 2006] by Wall Street favorite Alan Garcia, but wanted to ensure that dual U.S-Peruvian citizen Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, a former World Bank official, former Peruvian finance minister, and executive with arch-vulture capitalist Felix Rohatyn's Rohatyn Group investment fund in New York, beat out Keiko Fujimori, the daughter of the jailed former president and CIA cypher, Alberto Fujimori.

The financial oligarchy has actively worked to prevent the establishment of social reforms in Peru.

 

Despite this, in 2021, Pedro Castillo Terrones, a rural schoolteacher with no prior political experience, emerged victorious in the second round of the presidential election against the oligarchy's candidate, Keiko Fujimori, the daughter of Peruvian dictator Alberto Fujimori.

"Castillo was Peru's first leader from the rural Andes region. Campaigning on the slogan no more poor people in our rich country. He promised to address long standing issues of poverty and inequality," notes Francesca Emanuele, a Peruvian sociologist.

Castillo secured just over 50.13% of the vote.

Nearly 9 million Peruvians voted for Castillo's program of social reform.

In response, Castillo was attacked.

 

During the following year and a half, the oligarchy instigated,

"a period of great hostility as they sought to destabilize his government with a multi-pronged attack that included significant use of lawfare" premised on a demand to "throw out communism," writes Manolo De Los Santos.

In response to concerted attacks by the financial elite and business interests, Castillo attempted to make concessions, thus alienating his political base.

 

On December 7, 2022, the former rural school teacher moved to shut down the legislature and rule by decree. He was overthrown, imprisoned on corruption charges, and replaced by his vice president, Boularte.

 

Then Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador characterized Boularte as a,

"puppet of the oligarchy" that facilitates the theft of Peru's natural resources.

Obrador said,

"a national oligarchy, but above all, a foreign one is plundering Peru's natural resources. They need a puppet... a ruler to suit them, and a congress as well."

According to the Orinoco Tribune,

López Obrador has compared the current crisis in Peru to what happened in Mexico during "the neoliberal period," when constitutional reforms were carried out in favor of a rapacious minority for 36 years to give public goods to national and foreign companies.

During the Biden administration, Jose W. Fernandez, Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment, met with President Boluarte.

 

Fernandez was accompanied by a delegation of US corporations hosted by the Business Council for International Understanding and the US Embassy to Peru.

 

Secretary Fernandez,

"applauded Peru" for its "ongoing efforts to advance key goals for the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity" (APEP), also known as the Americas Partnership.

APEP envisions economic integration with,

Peru, Barbados, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, and Uruguay.

The "high-level goals of the initiative" seek to boost,

"trade agreements" and "galvanize greater economic cooperation in our hemisphere."

APEP is billed as "not a standard free trade agreement" and claims to,

address past neoliberal policies, in particular it eliminates Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions, which allow transnational corporations to undermine laws and regulations of sovereign nations in favor of a "free-market orthodoxy."

 

 

 

Confronting China, Securing Critical Minerals

 

In early December, Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Peruvian Foreign Minister Hugo de Zela,

"to discuss ongoing efforts to fight transnational criminal organizations and strengthen security," according to a State Department readout.

 

"Secretary Rubio reaffirmed the United States commitment to partnering to secure critical mineral supply chains."

 

Secretary Marco Rubio meets with

Peruvian Foreign Minister Hugo de Zela

at the Department of State in Washington, D.C.,

December 5, 2025.

 (Official State Department photo by Freddie Everett)

 

 

Peru is rich in minerals, most notably silver, and has the world's fourth largest mercury mine at Huancavelica.

 

US Geological Survey data shows that the country holds,

12% of the world's copper, 3.9% of gold, 15.3% of silver, 9.5% of zinc, 5.3% of lead, and 2.8% of tin reserves.

It also produces molybdenum (used in steel alloys), boron, iron ore, phosphate rock, and coal.

 

Early in Trump's second term, Miami Benworth Capital private-equity millionaire Bernie Navarro was selected to serve as US ambassador to Peru.

 

Trump said Navarro is,

"a strong advocate for America's Interests in Peru," that is to say corporate interests.

The private-equity entrepreneur is "best friends" with Marco Rubio and served as a top fundraiser for his campaigns, the Miami Herald reported.

 

In addition to loaning Rubio $850,000 in 2021, Navarro advised the future secretary of state on real estate transactions.

 

In May, Trump's Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, held a meeting with Peruvian Minister of Defense Walter Astudillo and Minister of Foreign Affairs Elmer Schialer.

 

Hegseth told the ministers in no uncertain terms China poses a significant threat to peace and security in Latin America, and added:

Beijing is investing and operating in the region for unfair economic gain and together, in order to prevent conflict, we need to robustly deter China's potential threats in the hemisphere.

According to the Peru Support Group, a UK organization dedicated to the awareness of human rights violations,

"Hegseth made clear the administration's posture in expecting Peru's collaboration in responding to the threat from China's policies towards Latin America, arguing that this would be fundamental in any strategic alliance between the two countries."

In return for Peru's collaboration, the United States agreed to supply both advanced equipment and training to the Peruvian armed forces.

 

Not long after the election, a former national security official from the Trump team advocated imposing a 60% tariff on goods entering the US at the Chancay megaport.

 

However, all goods leaving Chancay Port are shipped to Asia and China, not the US.

 

If the Trump administration forced China out of Latin America, the US would be on the hook to finance infrastructure projects, in addition to establishing markets for goods, an expensive option for a nation with a debt crisis estimated at more than $34 trillion.

 

China's continued financial support for Latin American infrastructure projects is evident in the Latin America Outlook 2025 report, which highlights that two-thirds of Latin American countries are participating in the Belt and Road Initiative.

 

The Port of Chancay is expected to drive infrastructure expansion in neighboring countries.

 

Increased Chinese investment faces opposition under the Trump administration's tougher stance on Chinese involvement in Latin America and the objective of eliminating China's extensive Belt and Road Initiative.

 

The United States and it allies have kicked started counter-initiatives to challenge China's BRI, including a Sinocentric international trade network:

These initiatives, however, are not of the same magnitude as BRI and are not likely to effectively counter China's growing influence.

 

Moreover, Trump's confrontational approach towards China, particularly through trade policies and tariffs, is unlikely to impede the growing adoption of a multipolar world.

 

Trump's desperation was obvious in October when he announced a 100% tariff on all Chinese imports - amounting to 130% when a previous tariff is added - in retaliation to new export controls Beijing planned for valuable rare earth minerals.

 

The president subsequently agreed to lower the tariff in exchange for a crackdown on fentanyl...