by Mike Whitney
Population control has been a not-so-hidden agenda ever
since the Club of Rome's publication of
The Limits to Growth
1972 and Dr. Paul Ehrlich's
The Population Bomb
Disguised in many ways to hide its true purpose, it is
remains patently anti-human.
Kissinger and Our Dystopian Future
"The further a
society drifts from the truth,
the more it will
hate those who speak it."
Can we agree that there
are two types of Covid-19?
1 - The
first type, is Covid-19, "The Virus",
which is a fairly mild infection that most people don't
even realize they've contracted.
They remain either
asymptomatic or have slight flu-like symptoms that go away after
a week or so.
A tiny sliver of
the population - that are mainly-older, vulnerable people
with underlying health conditions - can develop
complications, become seriously ill and die.
But, according to
most analysis, the chances of dying from Covid are roughly
1 in every 200 to
1 in every 1,000 people. (CDC-IFR- 0.26%)
In other words, Covid
is not the Spanish Flu, not the Black Plague and
the Genocidal Planetary Killer Virus it was cracked up to
It kills more
people than the annual influenza, but not significantly
2 - The second
type of Covid-19, is Covid "The Political
Contrivance" or, rather, CODENAME -
Operation Virus Identification
This iteration of the
Covid phenomenon relates to the manner in which a
modestly-lethal respiratory pathogen has been inflated into
a perennial public health crisis in order to implement economic
and societal changes that would otherwise be impossible.
This is the
political side of Covid, which is much more difficult to
define since it relates to the ambiguous agenda of powerful
elites who are using the infection to conceal their real
Many critics believe
that Covid is a vehicle
the Davos Crowd is using to
launch their authoritarian
New World Order.
Others think it has
more to do with
Climate Change, that is,
rather than build consensus among the world leaders for
mandatory carbon reductions, global mandarins have simply
imposed lockdowns that sharply reduce economic activity
This, in fact, has
lowered emissions significantly, but at great cost to most of
humanity. Covid restrictions have triggered a sharp uptick in
suicides, clinical depression, child abuse, domestic violence,
alcoholism and drug abuse.
The list goes on and
Also, it has left
economies everywhere in a shambles, increasing unemployment and
homelessness exponentially, while setting the stage for massive
famines in undeveloped countries around the world.
Even so, key players in
the Covid crisis - like mastermind
Bill Gates - continue to marvel
at impact these onerous restrictions have had on emissions.
Take a look at this
excerpt from a recent post at the Microsoft founder's blog:
"You may have seen
projections that, because economic activity has slowed down so
much, the world will emit fewer greenhouse gases this year than
projections are certainly true, their importance for the fight
against climate change has been overstated.
Analysts disagree about how much emissions will go down this
year, but the International Energy Agency puts the reduction
around 8 percent.
In real terms, that
means we will release the equivalent of around 47 billion tons
of carbon, instead of 51 billion.
That's a meaningful reduction, and we would be in great shape if
we could continue that rate of decrease every year.
Unfortunately, we can't.
Consider what it's taking to achieve this 8 percent reduction.
More than 600,000
people have died, and tens of millions are out of work.
This April, car
traffic was half what it was in April 2019.
For months, air
traffic virtually came to a halt.
To put it mildly,
this is not a situation that anyone would want to continue.
And yet we are still
on track to emit 92 percent as much carbon as we did last year.
What's remarkable is not how much emissions will go down because
of the pandemic, but how little.
In addition, these reductions are being achieved at, literally,
the greatest possible cost.
To see why, let's look at what it costs to avert a single ton of
greenhouse gases. This figure - the cost per ton of carbon
averted - is a tool that economists use to compare the expense
of different carbon-reduction strategies.
For example, if you
have a technology that costs $1 million, and using it lets you
avert the release of 10,000 tons of gas, you're paying $100 per
ton of carbon averted.
In reality, $100
per ton would still be pretty expensive...
But many economists
think this price reflects the true cost of greenhouse gases to
society, and it also happens to be a memorable round number that
makes a good benchmark for discussions.
Now let's treat the shutdown caused by COVID-19 as if it were a
Has closing off
major parts of the economy avoided emissions at anything
close to $100 per ton? No.
In the United
States, according to data from the Rhodium Group, it comes
to between $3,200 and $5,400 per ton.
In the European
Union, it's roughly the same amount.
In other words, the
shutdown is reducing emissions at a cost between 32 and 54 times
the $100 per ton that economists consider a reasonable price.
If you want to understand the kind of damage that climate change
will inflict, look at COVID-19 and spread the pain out over a
much longer period of time.
The loss of life and
economic misery caused by this pandemic are on par with what
will happen regularly if we do not eliminate the world's carbon
is awful - Climate change could be worse"
Isn't it curious that
Gates has spent so much time calculating the impact lockdowns
have had on carbon emissions? And look at how precise his
These are not "back of
the envelop" type computations, but a serious bit of
He even takes the number
of people who have died of Covid worldwide (600,000) and
painstakingly compares it to the projected "global mortality rates"
("on an annualized basis") of people who will die from "increases
in global temperatures."
Does it seem to you
that Gates might have more than a passing interest in these
Does it look like he
might be more than just a neutral observer impartially perusing
Let me pose a theory
In my opinion, Gates'
interest in these matters is not merely speculative curiosity.
He and his fellow
elites are conducting an elaborate science experiment in
which we - mere mortals - are the lab rats.
They are deliberately
the Covid-scare to conceal
their real objective which is,
to prove beyond a
doubt that curtailing emissions by shutting down vast
swathes of the global economy will NOT stave off
catastrophic climate change.
let's just assume for
the sake of argument that I'm right.
Let's assume that
other elites read Gates report and agree with its conclusions.
This is where it gets interesting, because Gates doesn't really
answer that question, but his silence gives him away.
Let me explain:
small decline in emissions this year makes one thing clear:
We cannot get to zero emissions simply - or even mostly - by
flying and driving less."
Okay, so we cannot stop
climate change by doing what we are doing now.
Then Gates says:
"Let science and
innovation lead the way…
response to climate change will have to tap into many different
disciplines… we'll need biology, chemistry, physics, political
science, economics, engineering, and other sciences."
Right again, we'll follow
Gates then says:
"It will take decades
to develop and deploy all the clean-energy inventions we need."
Okay, so we have to move
fast to avoid tragedy.
Finally, Gates says:
said for years that a pandemic was virtually inevitable. The
world did not do enough to prepare, and now we are trying to
make up for lost time.
This is a cautionary
tale for climate change, and it points us toward a better
So, on the one hand,
Gates is ,
'We must act
fast and follow the science', and on the other he is saying,
'Shutting down the economy alone isn't going to work.'
If it's not going to
then why bother...?
Why is Gates sending
a mixed message?
Ahh, but there's the rub.
It's not a mixed message and it is not a contradiction...
What Gates is doing is
leading the reader to draw the same conclusion that he has, (wink,
wink) that is,
if reducing economic
activity isn't going to work, then we have to find an entirely
different solution, like reducing the size of the population.
Isn't that the only
logical conclusion? Yes, it is...
So, the Great Lab
Experiment of 2020 (Covid) has a lot to do with
thinning the herd
so our exalted
Davos Overlords can ensure
their blue-blooded offspring will have mild temps when they
winter-over on their private islands in the Caribbean...
But population control
is just a small part of a much more ambitious plan to,
everyone on the planet
dispose of those
niggling civil liberties to which Americans have become so
The elitist strategy has
been dubbed the "Great
Reset" which refers to the World Economic Forum's
Covid Action Platform, a program that aims at restructuring
"economic and social foundations" in a way that best suits the
interests of "stakeholder" capitalists.
Here's a clip from their
may be gradually easing, but anxiety about the world's social
and economic prospects is only intensifying.
There is good reason
to worry: a sharp economic downturn has already begun, and we
could be facing the worst depression since the 1930s.
But, while this
outcome is likely, it is not unavoidable.
To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and
swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies,
from education to social contracts and working conditions.
Every country, from
the United States to China, must participate, and every
industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.
In short, we need a
"Great Reset" of capitalism…
The level of cooperation and ambition this implies is
unprecedented. But it is not some impossible dream. In fact, one
silver lining of the pandemic is that it has shown how quickly
we can make radical changes to our lifestyles.
Almost instantly, the
crisis forced businesses and individuals to abandon practices
long claimed to be essential, from frequent air travel to
working in an office...
Clearly, the will to build a better society does exist. We must
use it to secure the Great Reset that we so badly need. That
will require stronger and more effective governments, though
this does not imply an ideological push for bigger ones.
And it will demand
private-sector engagement every step of the way."
World Economic Forum's Covid Action Platform"
If it sounds like our
illustrious leaders want to remake society from the ground-up, it's
because that's exactly what they have in mind.
And they're not even
trying to hide their real intentions. They say quite bluntly:
"the world must act
jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and
economies, from education to social contracts and working
That sounds a lot like
marching orders to me and, indeed, that's exactly what they are:
But how do they intend to
affect these dramatic and revolutionary changes?
Why Covid, of course...
They're going to
use Covid to make fundamental changes to the existing
privatization ("stakeholder capitalism")
governments into a unified global regime
elements of social control (via mass electronic
surveillance, intrusive contact tracing, security
checkpoints, lockdowns, internal passports, biometric IDs,
steps are required to introduce a tyrannical
Brave New World...
It's all there in black
and white, they're not even trying to hide it.
In their own words, the
"Great Reset" depends on the Covid Action Platform, right...?
In order to,
"build a better
society" we need to "make radical changes to our lifestyles"
including reductions in "frequent air travel to working in an
So just forget that trip
to Italy next year Mr. and Mrs. WorkerBee. Ain't gonna happen...
Bill Gates says,
And get used to
working from home, too, because we don't want your dog-eared
Capri spewing carbon into our pristine-blue skies.
The statement also makes
clear that the obliteration of millions of jobs and small businesses
was not an accidental casualty of the Covid lockdowns, but the
planned demolition of business and workers these
Mucky-mucks consider 'non-essential'.
And as far as who will participate in this new blueprint for
Capitalist Valhalla? Well, everyone of course...
According to the authors:
"Every country, from
the United States to China, must participate, and every
industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed."
There it is from the
Biosecurity Slave State is emerging right before our very
eyes and we just thought we were in another Great Depression
rounded off with a pandemic.
So, when we talk about
Covid the "Political Contrivance", we're actually
referring to the vehicle that
elites have settled on to
transition the country from its present condition to a full-blown
"lock-down" police state.
Covid is the smokescreen
that's being used to conceal the maneuverings of filthy-rich
powerbrokers who want to implement their Grand Plan for humanity.
So, if everything feels
chaotic and upside-down at the present time, don't be alarmed; it's
all by design.
The more muddled and
turbulent the world becomes, the easier it is to get people to
submit to moronic activities like wearing a diaper on your mouth
every time you leave the house or standing 6 feet apart at the
grocery store so invisible pathogens don't climb up your pant-leg
and bite you.
Psychologists know that -
in a topsy-turvy world where uncertainty prevails - people are more
apt to follow the directives of affable blockheads, like
Tony Fauci, even though they
may be abandoning their last-claim to personal freedom in the
Looking back to April of 2020, we probably should have anticipated
where all this was headed, after all, Mr. NWO himself,
Henry Kissinger, announced what
to expect in an op-ed he posted in the Wall Street Journal.
Here's what he said:
"The reality is the
world will never be the same after the coronavirus.
To argue now about
the past only makes it harder to do what has to be done…"
(NOTE - Is Kissinger
clairvoyant? How did he know the "world would never be the same
"Enlightenment thinkers (argued) that the purpose of the
legitimate state is to provide for the fundamental needs of the
people… Individuals cannot secure these things on their own.
The pandemic has
prompted an anachronism, a revival of the walled city in an age
when prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people."
(NOTE - In other
words: Globalism is good, Nationalism is bad. The same refrain
we've heard for the last 30 years.)
While the assault on human health (from Covid) will - hopefully
- be temporary, the political and economic upheaval it has
unleashed could last for generations.
(NOTE - Another peek
into Henry's crystal ball, eh?)
No country, not even
the U.S., can in a purely national effort overcome the virus.
necessities of the moment must ultimately be coupled with a
global collaborative vision and program."
Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order"
As Kissinger clearly
globalization is still alive and
the Davos heavyweights who now see
a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to put their plan into action.
Parts of Australia and
New Zealand are already under de-facto martial law while PM
Boris Johnson is adding another 2,000 cops in London to
enforce his goofy Covid mandates.
Everywhere in the western
world, freedom is collapsing faster than a corrugated lean-to in a
panic-stricken America, fainthearted proles continue to hide behind
their sofas waiting for the faux-plague to pass.
Do they even see the
train-wreck just ahead?
Author Gary D. Barnett
summed it up like this:
"At this moment in
time we are standing on a precipice with the state attempting to
push us over the edge.
Once over that edge,
there will be no coming back.
This is why if the
people fight back in mass, and withhold all support from the
governing demons, we can awaken from this nightmare, and regain
State's Covid Response Is a Cancer for the Freedom of Humanity"
D. Barnett, Lew Rockwell
Bravo, Mr. Barnett. That
says it all...