by Dr. Joseph Mercola
May 25, 2022
The World Health
Organization is attempting to seize control over global
pandemic monitoring and response and, ultimately, all health
intends to play a key part in this takeover. He's building a
pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the "Global
Epidemic Response & Mobilization" or GERM Team, which will
have the authority to monitor nations and make pandemic
response decisions, such as when to suspend civil liberties
to prevent spread of an illness
cabal plans to seize control through biosecurity governance,
and they're attempting to do this using two different
avenues. If we fail to fight off both attacks, we'll end up
under totalitarian governance
The first attack
comes in the form of amendments to the International Health
Regulations (IHR), which are currently being voted on by the
World Health Assembly. These amendments will strip member
nations of their sovereignty and give the WHO unprecedented
power to restrict your medical freedoms and civil liberties
in the name of biosecurity. Get involved and urge your
nation's leaders to reject the amendments if passed. Unless
rejected, they will become binding law in November 2022
The second attack
comes through a new international pandemic treaty with the
WHO. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and
provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be
addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering - not to mention the loss of individual freedom
In "The Corbett Report" above, 1 independent journalist James Corbett
reviews the contents of Bill Gates' book, "How to Prevent the Next
"It's every bit as infuriating, nauseating, ridiculous, laughable
and risible as you would expect," he says. "This is a ridiculous
book... There's certainly nothing of medical or scientific value in
here... It's a baffling book even from a propagandistic
Gates' goal in writing the book is to disarm the public and prepare
us to accept the agenda that Gates and his allies would like to
impose on the world.
Ultimately, what this is about is drumming up
general public support - or at least general public understanding - of the unfolding biosecurity
Another reviewer of Gates' book, economist Jeffrey Tucker, offered
similarly negative feedback: 2
"Imagine yourself sidled up to a bar. A talkative guy sits down on
the stool next to you. He has decided that there is one thing wrong
with the world. It can be literally anything. Regardless, he has the
It's interesting and weird for a few minutes.
But you gradually come
to realize that he is actually crazy. His main point is wrong and so
his solutions are wrong too. But the drinks are good, and he is
buying. So you put up with it. In any case, you will forget the
whole thing in the morning.
In the morning, however, you realize that he is one of the world's
richest men and he is pulling the strings of many of the world's
most powerful people.
Now you are alarmed.
In a nutshell, that's
what it's like to read Bill Gates's new book ‘How to Prevent the
Gates' Book Chapter by Chapter
Corbett goes through Gates' book chapter by chapter, so if you're
short on time, you can review the ones that interest you the most:
Chapter 1: Learn from COVID (timestamp: 12:58)
Chapter 2: Create a pandemic prevention team (timestamp: 18:23)
Chapter 3: Get better at detecting outbreaks early (timestamp:
Chapter 4: Help people protect themselves right away (timestamp:
Chapter 5: Find new treatments fast (timestamp: 37:26)
Chapter 6: Get ready to make vaccines (timestamp: 39:46)
Chapter 7: Practice, practice, practice (timestamp: 47:06)
Chapter 8: Close the health gap between rich and poor countries
Chapter 9: Make - and fund - a plan for preventing pandemics
Afterword: How COVID changed the course of our digital future
Gates GERM Team
By now, you've probably heard that the
World Health Organization is
attempting to seize control over global pandemic monitoring and
response, and ultimately, all health care decisions.
But did you
know Bill Gates, the largest funder of the WHO (if you combine
funding from his foundation and GAVI), also intends to play a key
part in this takeover?
As Gates explains in a video at the beginning of Corbett's report,
he's building a pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the
"Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization" or GERM Team.
will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO's purview,
and will monitor nations and make decisions about when to suspend
civil liberties to prevent spread of an illness. 3
Alas, as noted by "Rising" host Kim Iversen in the video compilation
above, if COVID-19 has taught us anything, it's that stopping the
spread of a virus is more or less impossible, no matter how
draconian the rules.
Meanwhile, the side effects of lockdowns and
business shutdowns are manifold.
People's health has suffered from lack of health care. Depression
and suicide have skyrocketed. Economies have gone bust. Violent
crime has risen.
Tucker also points out the false premise behind
Gates' pandemic prevention plan, stating: 4
"This theory of virus control - the notion that muscling the
population makes a prevalent virus shrink into submission and
disappear - is a completely new invention, the mechanization of a
Smallpox occupies a unique position among infectious diseases as the
only one affecting humans that has been eradicated. There are
reasons for that: a stable pathogen, a great vaccine, and a hundred
years of focused public health work. This happened not due to
lockdowns but from the careful and patient application of
traditional public-health principles.
[T]he attempt to crush a respiratory virus through universal
avoidance could be worse than allowing endemicity to it to develop
throughout the population."
Gates' Destructive Greed
During COVID, we basically traded false protection against one thing
for a multitude of other ills that are far worse in the long run.
Now, Gates and the WHO want to make this disastrous strategy the
Once again, we see Gates is basically paying the WHO to dictate what
the world must do to make him a ton of money, because he's always
heavily invested in the very "solutions" he presents to the world.
While he's built a reputation as a philanthropist, his actions are
self-serving, and more often than not, the recipients of his
"generosity" end up worse than they were before.
Case in point: After 15 years, Gates' Green Revolution in Africa
(AGRA) project has now been proven an epic fail. 5 Gates promised the
project would "double yields and incomes for 30 million farming
households by 2020."
That false prognosis was deleted from the AGRA website in June 2020,
after a Tuft University assessment revealed hunger had actually
increased by 31%.
February 28, 2022, the first-ever evaluation
report 6 confirmed the failure of AGRA.
The Globalists' Double-Prong Attack on National Sovereignty
But getting back to the globalists' plan to seize global control
through biosecurity governance, they are attempting to do this using
two different avenues.
If we fail to fight off both attacks, we'll
end up under totalitarian governance.
The first attack comes in the form of amendments 7 to the
International Health Regulations (IHR). The second attack comes
through a new international pandemic treaty with the WHO.
Starting with the first takeover strategy, as you read this,
countries around the world are in the process of voting on
amendments to the IHR. 8
By May 28, 2022, the World Health Assembly
will have concluded their vote on these amendments and, if passed,
they will be enacted into international law in November 2022.
The IHR, adopted in 2005, is what empowers the WHO to declare a
Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). 9
This is a
special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain
contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts.
While the IHR grants the WHO exceptional power over global health
policy already, under the current rules, member states must consent
to the WHO's recommendations.
This is one key feature that is up for revision. Under the new
amendments, the WHO would be able to declare a PHEIC in a member
state over the objection of that state.
The amendments also include
ceding control to WHO regional directors authorized to declare a
Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC).
In summary, the IHR amendments establish "a globalist architecture
of worldwide health surveillance, reporting and management," Robert
Malone, Ph.D., warns, 10 and we the public have no say in the matter.
We have no official avenue for providing feedback to the World
Health Assembly, even though the amendments will give the WHO
unprecedented power to restrict our rights and freedoms in the name
There's not even a publicly available list of who
the delegates are or who will vote on the amendments.
Summary of Proposed IHR Amendments
A summary of the proposed changes to the IHR was recently provided
by Malone. 11
In all, the WHO wants to amend 13 different IHR
articles (articles 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53 and
59), the end result of which is the following: 12
- Under Article 5, the WHO will develop
early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk
assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type
of modeling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk
from COVID-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its
assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental
organizations and other member states.
- Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state
is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or
reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can
be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international
disapproval lead by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member
Secret sources - Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed
sources for information leading it to declare a public health
emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such
as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI
Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.
- Under Article 12, when the WHO receives
undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat
in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with
the WHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can
unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency
of international concern.
The Director General's
authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be
used to enforce sanctions on nations."
Once the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly,
nations will have only a limited time - six months - to reject them.
That would put us into November 2022. Any nation which hasn't
officially rejected the amendments will then be legally bound by
them, and any attempt to reject them after the six-month grace
period will be null and void.
Attack No. 2 - The WHO Pandemic Treaty
The second attempt to gain global control is through an
international pandemic treaty with the WHO.
negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World
Health Assembly in December 2021, 13 for the purpose of drafting and
negotiating this new pandemic treaty.
In summary, the WHO wants to make its pandemic leadership permanent.
It can then extend its power into the health care systems of every
nation, and eventually implement a universal or "socialist-like"
health care system as part of The Great Reset.
While a WHO-based universal health care system is not currently
being discussed, there's every reason to suspect that this is part
of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
has previously stated that his "central priority" as
director-general is to push the world toward universal health
And, considering the WHO changed its definition of
"pandemic" to "a
worldwide epidemic of a disease," 15 without the original specificity
of severe illness that causes high morbidity, 16,17 just about
anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion.
The problem with this treaty is that it simply cannot work. The
whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that "shared threat
requires shared response." But a given threat is almost never
equally shared across regions.
The WHO intends to
eliminate individualized medicine
blanket rulings for how a given threat
is to be addressed, and this
can only result
in needless suffering
- not to mention
the loss of
Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the
same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it's
not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is
highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.
The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere,
yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region,
person to person.
They intend to eliminate individualized medicine
and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be
addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering - not to
mention the loss of individual freedom.
Are You Ready to Cede All Authority to Gates-Led Group?
In closing, Gates' GERM team would be the ones with the authority to
declare pandemics and coordinate global response. 18
Are you ready to
cede all authority over your life, health and livelihood to the
likes of Gates? I hope not.
In the video above, Del Bigtree with
"The Highwire" provides
poignant examples where Gates is now admitting what "The Highwire,"
I and many others have been saying since the earliest days of the COVID pandemic, and getting censored and deplatformed for it.
Gates is two years behind everyone else, yet despite his apparent
inability to interpret the readily available data, he now wants
power to dictate health rules to the whole world.
We can't let that
Join the Global #StopTheWHO Campaign
It's going to require a global response to prevent these two power
grabs, starting with the IHR amendments under vote by the World
To that end, the World Council for Health has
launched a global #StopTheWHO campaign.
Here's how you can get
Speak - Raise awareness on the ground and online. Use articles,
Act - Campaign through rallies, political mobilization, legal
notices and cases and similar campaigns
Collaborate with health freedom coalitions such as the World Council
Explore activist toolboxes such as:
Engage global indigenous leadership to take a united stand against
the WHO's IHR
Notify World Health Assembly country delegates to oppose the IHR
Activate people's parliaments, legislatures or referendums to oppose
Sources and References
Report Episode 418, May 10, 2022
2, 4 Brownstone
Institute May 3, 2022
Counter Signal May 2, 2022
Digs April 27, 2022
March 17, 2022
Policy Watch February 23, 2022
8, 9 CDC
International Health Regulations
10, 11, 12 RW
Malone Substack May 17, 2022
Proposed Method of Work February 21, 2022
Review June 14, 2017
Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured September 2, 2009
Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured May 1, 2009 (PDF)
Lancet May 14, 2022; 399(10338): 1853
Malone Substack May 17, 2022