German model of the Angela Merkel regime
to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic is now engulfed
in a series of potentially devastating scandals
going to the very heart of the testing and
medical advice being used to declare
draconian economic shutdowns and next,
de facto mandatory vaccinations.
The scandals involve a professor at the heart
of Merkel's corona advisory group.
The implications go far beyond German borders
to the very WHO itself and
their global 'recommendations'...
The entire case for WHO-mandated emergency lockdown of businesses, schools, churches and other social arenas worldwide is based on a test introduced, amazingly early on, in the Wuhan, China coronavirus saga.
On January 23, 2020, in the scientific journal Eurosurveillance, of the EU Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Dr. Christian Drosten, along with several colleagues from the Berlin Virology Institute at Charite Hospital, along with the head of a small Berlin biotech company, TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, published a study claiming to have developed the first effective test for detecting whether someone is infected with the novel coronavirus identified first only days before in Wuhan.
The Drosten article was titled, "Detection of 2019 novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR" - Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020.
Since then the Drosten-backed test for the virus, called a real-time or RT-PCR test, has spread via WHO worldwide, as the most used test protocol to determine if a person might have COVID-19, the illness.
On November 27 a highly-respected group of 23 international virologists, microbiologists and related scientists published a call for Eurosurveillance to retract the January 23, 2020 Drosten article.
To begin with, as the critical scientists reveal, the paper that established the Drosten PCR test for the Wuhan strain of coronavirus that has subsequently been adopted with indecent haste by the Merkel government along with WHO for worldwide use - resulting in severe lockdowns globally and an economic and social catastrophe - was never peer-reviewed before its publication by Eurosurveillance journal.
The critics point out that,
Incredibly, the Drosten test protocol, which he had already sent to WHO in Geneva on 17 January, was,
As the critical authors point out, for a subject so complex and important to world health and security, a serious 24-hour "peer review" from at least two experts in the field is not possible.
The critics point out that Drosten and his co-author Dr. Chantal Reusken, did not disclose a glaring conflict of interest. Both were also members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance.
Further, as reported by BBC and Google Statistics, on January 21 there were a world total of 6 deaths being attributed to the Wuhan virus.
Another co-author of the Drosten paper that gave a cover of apparent scientific credibility to the Drosten PCR procedure was head of the company who developed the test being marketed today, with the blessing of WHO, in the hundreds of millions, Olfert Landt, of Tib-Molbiol in Berlin, but Landt did not disclose that pertinent fact in the Drosten paper either.
Certainly nothing suspicious or improper here, or...?
It would be relevant to know if Drosten, the Merkel chief scientific advisor for COVID-19, Germany's de facto "Tony Fauci", gets a percentage for each test sold by Tib-Molbiol in their global marketing agreement with Roche.
Since late January 2020, world mainstream media has inundated us all with frightening hourly updates on,
Usually they simply add each daily increase to a global total of "confirmed cases," presently over 66 million.
Alarming, but for the fact that, as Pieter Borger and his fellow scientific collaborators point out,
Here we take up the most glaring that can easily be grasped by most laypeople.
But even more damning for Drosten is the fact that he mentioned nowhere of a test being positive or negative, or indeed what defines a positive or negative result!
The Borger report notes,
The WHO and Drosten recommend a Ct of 45 cycles and, reportedly, presently the German health officials do as well.
Little wonder that as the number of tests is ramped up in the onset of winter flu season, PCR "positives" in Germany and elsewhere explode.
As the critical authors point out, were the health authorities to specify 35 cycles maximum, the number of corona positive would be only less than 3% the present number!
The authors add,
In simple English,
The test of Drosten and WHO is more or less, scientific crap...!
Missing Doctor proof too?
This devastating critique from twenty three world leading scientists, including scientists who have patents related to PCR, DNA Isolation and Sequencing, and a former Pfizer Chief Scientist, is damning, but not the only problem Professor Dr. Christian Drosten faces today.
He and the officials at Frankfurt's Goethe University, where he claims to have received his medical doctorate in 2003, are being accused of degree fraud.
According to Dr. Markus Kühbacher, a specialist investigating scientific fraud such as dissertation plagiarism, Dr. Drosten's doctor thesis, by law must be deposited on a certain date with academic authorities at his University, who then sign a legal form, Revisionsschein, verified with signature, stamp of the University and date, with thesis title and author, to be sent to the University archive.
With it, three original copies of the thesis are filed. Kühbacher charges that the Goethe University is guilty of cover-up by claiming, falsely, Drosten's Revisionsschein, was on file.
The University spokesman later was forced to admit it was not filed, at least not locatable by them.
Moreover, of the three mandatory file copies of his doctor thesis, highly relevant given the global importance of Drosten's coronavirus role, two copies have "disappeared," and the remaining single copy is water-damaged. Kühbacher says Drosten will now likely face court charges for holding a fraudulent doctoral title.
Whether that is to pass, it is a fact that a separate legal process has been filed in Berlin against two people responsible for a German media site, Volksverpetzer.de, for slander and defamation, brought by a well-known and critical German medical doctor, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg.
The court case demands of the defendants €250,000 in damages for defamation of character and material damages to Wodarg by the accused in their online site, as well as in other German media, claiming they viciously and without proof, defamed Wodarg, calling him a "covid-denier," falsely calling him a right-extremist (he is a life-long former parliament member of the Social Democratic Party) and numerous other false and damaging charges.
The attorney for Dr Wodarg is a well-known German-American attorney, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich.
In his charges against the defendants, Fuellmich cites in full the charges against the Drosten test for coronavirus of Dr. Pieter Borger et al noted above.
If the stakes were not so deadly for mankind it would all be material for a comedy of the absurd...
With this crew, Germans are seeing their lives destroyed by lockdowns and social measures never before imagined outside Stalin's Soviet Union.
There is science and then there is science. Not all "science" is valid however...