It is not simply the notion that civilization shifts or changes abruptly on its own; rather, it is their name for a directed and engineered vision:
There are other names for this engineered vision, including the "global economic reset," or the more general and innocuous term "globalism," but the intention is the same.
The ultimate goal of the 'New World Order' as an ideology is total centralization of economic and governmental power into the hands of a select and unaccountable bureaucracy made up of international financiers.
This is governance according the the dictates of Plato's Republic; a delusional fantasy world in which benevolent philosopher kings, supposedly smarter and more objective than the rest of us, rule from on high with scientific precision and wisdom.
It is a world where
administrators become gods...
The results will always be destruction and disaster. Then, add to this the fact that the kinds of people who often pursue such power are predominantly narcissistic sociopaths and psychopaths.
If a governmental
structure of high level centralization is allowed to form, it opens
a door for these mentally and spiritually broken people to play out
their twisted motives on a global stage.
That is to say, they will
adopt a host of seemingly noble causes to rationalize their
scramble for power, but in the end these "humanitarians" only care
about imposing their will on as many people as possible while
feeding off them for as long as time allows.
The schemes involved in
implementing globalism are designed to confuse the masses with
crisis until they end up ASKING for more centralization and less
This plays primarily to
the economic side of global governance, which in my view is the most
important because without economic centralization political
centralization is not possible.
What we have today under globalism are NOT free markets.
Instead, globalism has
supplied unfettered power to international corporations which
cannot exist without government charter and government financial
They also receive immense
taxpayer funded welfare through bailouts and other sources when they
fail to manage their business responsibly. All this while small
businesses and entrepreneurs are impeded at every turn by taxation
and legal obstacles.
Only massive corporations supported by governments are able to exploit the advantages of international manufacturing and labor sources in a way that ensures long term success.
Meanwhile economic models that promote true decentralization and localism become impractical because real competition is never allowed. The world has not enjoyed free markets in at least a century.
What we have today is
something entirely different.
As the public becomes
more educated on the dangers of economic centralization and more
specifically the dangers of central banks, the globalists are
attempting to shift the narrative to muddy the waters.
The problem is that
globalism is not about the dollar, U.S. hegemony or the so-called
"deep state," which in my view is a distraction from the bigger
issue at hand.
The globalists WANT a less dominant U.S. and a more involved East, while the East continues to call for more control of the global economy by the IMF.
unfortunately flies over the heads of most economists, even in the
However, what is really happening is that as the U.S. falls globalist edifices like the IMF and the BIS rise. We are moving from centralization to super-centralization.
Globalists have pulled a
bait and switch in order to trick the liberty movement into
supporting the success of the East (which is actually also globalist
controlled) and a philosophy which basically amounts to a
re-branding of the 'New World Order' as some kind of
On the one hand, they like tribalism because in some cases tribalism can be turned into zealotry, and zealots are easy to exploit and manipulate.
Wars between nations
(tribes) can be instigated if the tribal instinct is weighted with
artificial fears and threats.
This makes the establishment of a "one world ideology" very difficult, if not impossible.
The first inclination of
human beings is to discriminate against ideas and people they see as
destructive and counter to their prosperity. Globalists therefore
have to convince a majority of people that the very tribalism that
has fueled our social evolution and some of the greatest ideas in
history is actually the source of our eventual doom.
This requires considerable crisis blamed on nationalism and "populist" ideals. Engineered war, whether kinetic or economic, is the best method to scapegoat tribalism.
Every tragedy from now on must eventually be attributed to ideas of separation and logical discrimination against negative ideologies.
The solution of globalism will then be offered:
Trying to implement such a system by force alone would end in failure, because revolution is the natural end result of tyranny. Therefore, the 'New World Order' has to be introduced as if it had been formed by coincidence or by providence.
Any hint that the public
is being conned into accepting global centralization would trigger
It is spoken of with reverence in mainstream economic publications and political discussions. It receives almost religious praise in the halls of academia.
socioeconomic ambrosia - the food of deities. It is
the fountain of youth. It is a new Eden...
There is far more
evidence that globalism is a poisonous ideology that can only ever
gain a foothold through trickery and through
Make no mistake - the globalists already have a solution prepackaged for us...
They have been acclimating and conditioning the public to accept it for decades now.
That solution will not bring what it promises:
eventually try to sell us on a full-blown 'New World Order', they
will pull out every conceivable image of heaven on Earth, but
they will do this only after creating a tangible and ever present