by Patrick Wood
Adobe Stock, ktdesign
Few people saw
the real driving force behind
'Agenda 21' and
the 'Biodiversity Convention in 1992.'
This article is
necessarily long and detailed.
Some may find it
difficult to follow.
research is explosive and gives
a new and
of how and why
the world was thrown upside down
with a pandemic
narrative orchestrated by
Big Pharma and
the biotechnology industries.
In the interest of space,
purposefully left out
areas that tie into this story.
One is the
Humanity 2.0 via genetic engineering.
Another is how
it ties into the
Forum's Great Reset,
which contains a
rich narrative on
the human race.
Lastly, what is
the full meaning of
harmony with nature."
These will be
explored in future articles.
sincere hope is that
will pick up
the trail and
blow the lid off the greatest story
never (yet) told
on planet earth.
major concern at the 1992 Convention on Biodiversity was
"protecting the pharmaceutical and emerging biotechnology
United Nations defined Biodiversity as "genetic resources",
which meant that genetic material was to be owned,
exploited, and controlled through genetic engineering
performed by the Biotech industry.
Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework calls for digital
genetic sequencing of all species, including humans, to be
stored as a global common asset and made available for
licensing by the biotechnology industry.
intends to "bring about a transformation in society's
relationship with biodiversity and to ensure that, by 2050,
the shared vision of living in harmony with nature is
In 1992, the original UN Convention on Biological Diversity was
conducted in parallel with the Agenda 21 Conference under the name
of the UN Conference on Economic Development (UNCED).
Both were held in Rio de
Janiero, Brazil, and were sponsored by the,
Environmental Program (UNEP)
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)...
Agenda 21 was called "the agenda
for the 21st century" and was centered around
Sustainable Development, a resource-based economic system
closely resembling historic Technocracy. 1
According to the International Institute for Sustainable
development has been defined in many ways, but the most
frequently quoted definition is from Our Common Future,
also known as the Brundtland Report:
development is development that meets the needs of the
present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs." 2
The book, Our Common
Future, was published in 1987 and became the blueprint for the
Rio conference just 5 years later.
The author and head of
the UN study known as the Brundtland Commission, was chaired
Trilateral Commission member Gro
She was the Prime
Minister of Norway and previously, the Minister of the Environment.
It is no surprise that a
Trilateral Commission member created this policy that has literally
turned the world upside down.
In fact, it was the
Trilateral Commission in 1973 who originally declared that their
members would create its self-declared "New International Economic
Trilaterals Over Washington -
Volumes I and II, Wood & Sutton)
The Rio conference proposed the question, what can be done to save
the world from excessive development that causes pollution, global
warming, loss of rain forests, etc.
The answer was that more
development was needed and by the same actors that were previously
wrecking habitats and plundering nations.
In other words, more
development was needed to erase the effects of previous
Brundtland convinced the
UN that this somehow made sense, and it was subsequently adopted as,
"the agenda for the
21st century" in 1992.
Others saw through the smoke and mirrors...
researchers and authors noted in their book, The Earth Brokers:
"free trade and its
promoters came to be seen as the solution to the global
ecological crisis." 3
They could not have been
"We argue that UNCED
has boosted precisely the type of industrial development that is
destructive for the environment, the planet, and its
We see how, as a
result of UNCED, the rich will get richer, the poor
poorer, while more and more of the planet is destroyed
in the process." 4
In 2021, this result
could not be more clearly seen:
the rich are off the
charts, the poor are in the gutters and the planet and its
economic systems are in tatters.
How did we get here?
Here is the first hint
when they concluded:
nor the secretariat, nor the governments drafted plan to examine
the pitfalls of free trade and industrial development.
Instead, they wrote
up a convention on how to 'develop' the use of biodiversity
through patents and biotechnology." 5
For all else that UNCED
purported to be, its true mission was capturing and using
biodiversity for the sake of the biotechnology industry.
This fact has been largely overlooked until the
Great ('pandemic') Panic of 2020,
when it became apparent that the global takeover was being
orchestrated by elements of that very same biotechnology industry.
Agenda for the 21st century, indeed...
Biodiversity really means
Once I learned what to look for, I saw it everywhere.
Let's start with
Our Common Future
"The diversity of
species is necessary for the normal functioning of ecosystems
and the biosphere as a whole.
The genetic material
in wild species contributes billions of dollars yearly to the
world economy in the form of improved crop species, new drugs
and medicines, and raw materials for industry." 6
The specific development
of biodiversity is seen in Chapter 6, Species and Ecosystems:
Resources for Development:
"Species and their
genetic materials promise to play an expanding role in
development, and a powerful economic rationale is emerging to
bolster the ethical, aesthetic, and scientific case for
variability and germplasm material of species make contributions
to agriculture, medicine, and industry worth many billions of
dollars per year...
If nations can ensure
the survival of species, the world can look forward to new and
improved foods, new drugs and medicines, and new raw materials
for industry." 7
Further on, Brundtland
"Vast stocks of
biological diversity are in danger of disappearing just as
science is leaning how to exploit genetic variability through
the advances of genetic engineering...
It would be grim
irony indeed if just as new genetic engineering techniques begin
to let us peer into life's diversity and use genes more
efficiently to better human conditions, we looked and found this
treasure sadly depleted." 8
- Conclusion #1:
"biodiversity" is explained to mean "genetic resources".
something to be exploited and used more efficiently than
they are used in their natural state.
Turning back to The Earth Brokers, the authors'
observations provide an eye-witness account of what they
actually saw at the UNCED and Biodiversity Convention
convention implicitly equates the diversity of life -
animals and plants - to the diversity of genetic codes,
for which read genetic resources.
By doing so,
diversity becomes something that modern science can
convention promotes biotechnology as being 'essential
for the conservation and sustainable use of
If there is any
doubt as to what the goal is, they conclude with this
stake raised by the Biodiversity Convention is the issue
of ownership and control over biological diversity...
the major concern was protecting the pharmaceutical and
emerging biotechnology industries." 10
To reinforce the
thought, the authors bluntly stated,
up a convention on how to 'develop' the use of
biodiversity through patents and biotechnology." 11
that ownership and control over
genes was not a side issue or a minor stake:
It was the
means genetic material is to be owned, exploited and
controlled through genetic engineering performed by the
UNCED and Agenda
21 was largely a smokescreen to obscure the reality of
Despite the fact than the UNCED conference was expected to
bridge the gaps between the North and South, it was apparent
that it was totally dominated by the developed nations of
Brokers explained that all solutions were provided by,
science, Western technology, Western information,
Western training, Western money and Western
The third world
was being set up to be plundered yet once again, in the name
of Sustainable Development and Biodiversity.
The prize is
genetic engineering and ownership of the resulting
genetically engineered products.
Consistent throughout UN Documents
In the same year as the UNCED conference in 1992, UNEP and IUCN
published the Global Biodiversity Strategy as "Guidelines for Action
to Save, Study, and Use Earth's Biotic Wealth Sustainably and
The same themes were
presented, but carefully so in order to get the third world's
For all of the new
anticipated revenue generated by the biotech companies, a royalty
revenue stream was promised to the originating countries.
Under the subtitle, Promote recognition of the value of local
knowledge and genetic resources and affirm local peoples'
rights, concerns over Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are
agreements should reflect the concepts of just compensation and
accountability, and codes of conduct should apply to genetic
resource collectors, anthropologists, or other researchers
studying local peoples or local resource management. In some
cases, contracts may be needed to ensure the return of royalties
or other benefits to local communities or individuals." 14
Elsewhere it stated:
depends on biodiversity for its raw material, the value of
genetic resources will grow with the industry." 15
not about preserving species, but rather it is the source of
raw materials for the biotech industry, for which it should
pay royalties on commercial products back to the original
points of collection.
Of course, just the opposite has happened.
Monsanto, for instance,
developed and patented genetically modified crop seed, and
then proceeded to force the farmers to pay royalties for the
use of the seeds, instead of the other way around.
Bullies Small Farmers", "Argentine farmers will pay
royalties to seed companies" and "How Monsanto wrote and
broke laws to enter India" were common.
publications like Global Biodiversity Strategy and
the Global Biodiversity Assessment were only needed
to get the signatures of 196 or so nations of the world to
agree to a fantasy that would never happen.
the United Nations and its
myriad of NGO actors would hold those nations to the
treaties and agreements, regardless of the harm and pain
being caused to those very same nations.
Game Change -
The Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework
In the same way that
Agenda 21 was updated by
2030 Agenda in 2015, the Global
Biodiversity Convention is currently being refined by the
Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.
Although it will
culminate in 2022, working groups have been busy since 2020,
creating the various elements that will go into the completed
Because biotechnology and genetic science has progressed so rapidly
over the last 25 years, the previous phrase "genetic resources" is
now deemed to be unsuitable going forward, and it is being replaced
with the phrase "digital sequence information on genetic resources":
According to the
National Human Genome Research Institute, the concept of
"digital sequencing" is described as:
means determining the order of the four chemical building
blocks - called "bases" - that make up the DNA molecule.
tells scientists the kind of genetic information that is
carried in a particular DNA segment.
scientists can use sequence information to determine which
stretches of DNA contain genes and which stretches carry
regulatory instructions, turning genes on or off.
In addition, and
importantly, sequence data can highlight changes in a gene
that may cause disease.
In the DNA double helix, the four chemical bases always bond
with the same partner to form "base pairs."
This pairing is
the basis for the mechanism by which DNA molecules are
copied when cells divide, and the pairing also underlies the
methods by which most DNA sequencing experiments are done.
The human genome
contains about 3 billion base pairs that spell out the
instructions for making and maintaining a human being."
The principal is
identical for all life forms on earth, all of which have DNA that
can be sequenced and fed into a
storage, retrieval, and analysis.
It also envisions
synthetic biology where DNA is reengineered in ways that do not
occur in nature, for the sake of "improvement" and "wellbeing" for
According to the Report of the Open-Ended Working Group on the
Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework on its Third Meeting
[The working group]
relation between genetic resources and digital sequence
information on genetic resources, as well as the scope of
bioinformatic tools in the design and creation of new
digital sequence information on genetic resources elements
that are created artificially
sequence information on genetic resources are not genetic
resources as defined in the Convention on Biological
that access to
and utilization of digital sequence information on genetic
resources is useful for research relating to conservation
and sustainable use of biodiversity, food security, health
and other important sectors, including commercial
applications resulting in commercial products." 17
item notes that,
"any approach to
address digital sequence information on genetic resources should
provide for the special status of pathogens of pandemic
To say that this change
of definition, approach and meanings are minor is rebutted by the
fact that the phrase "digital sequence information on genetic
resources" is used 167 times across the 167 pages of the document,
on average, one
mention per page...
Yes, it is a major
doctrine and it is a sea change of opportunity for the biotech
industry to meddle with all life systems on earth in order to make
them more "sustainable."
- Conclusion #6:
All species of
life are to be digitally sequenced, placed into a database,
recognized as a global common asset and made available for
"licensing" by the biotech industry.
Mapping of the
Human Genome took most of the 1990s.
which started in 2010, is virtually complete.
Now, mapping all DNA
on earth, including human DNA, is the next big Technocrat/Transhuman
The outcome will be
genetic manipulation of any or all living creatures and the creation
of synthetic DNA that does not currently exist in nature.
All of this is headed toward an overriding goal that has been
misread by researchers and authors.
It now takes on a frightening
"The post-2020 global
biodiversity framework builds on the Strategic Plan for
Biodiversity 2011-2020 and sets out an ambitious plan to
implement broad-based action to bring about a transformation in
society's relationship with biodiversity and to ensure that, by
2050, the shared vision of living in harmony with nature is
How do we get there from
The same paper discusses
its "theory of change" that it supports with the figure below:
The keys to interpret
this figure are contained in this paper.
It is never declared exactly who shares this so-called vision of
"living in harmony with nature", but it certainly isn't anyone who
grasps the facts presented in this paper.
Hiding behind benevolent
concepts such as 'eliminating poverty' and 'providing education for
all,' is a cadre of genetic engineers intent on making life
"sustainable" on planet earth by simply changing the structure and
nature of life that consumes resources, including humanity itself.
The mad global dash to inject synthetic mRNA and
synthetic DNA into
the arms of every human on earth should make a little more sense to
This is their shared
to bridge the gap between humanity and nature to be "living
in harmony" with it, to balance the scales of resources vs.
consumption, to create new markets for new products, to bring to
life the transhuman dream of modifying DNA to achieve life extension
and ultimately, immortality.
This has happened right under our noses while everyone's attention
was focused on other issues.
What we thought were the
key issues of Agenda 21, the 2030 Agenda, Biodiversity Convention,
etc., were indeed real issues, but they were not the main issue.
Indeed, the main issue is,
the takeover of all
genetic material on earth...
 Wood, Patrick M.
(2015). Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global
Transformation, Coherent Publishing.
 Chatterjee and Finger (1994). The Earth Brokers: Power,
Politics and World Development. Routledge. p. 40.
 Ibid. p. 3
 Ibid. p. 171.
Our Common Future - Brundtland Report 1987
- p. 13.
 Ibid. p. 147.
 Ibid. p. 149-150.
 Op cit. p. 42.
 Op cit. p. 43.
 Op Cit. p. 171,
 Op cit. p. 50.
 UNEP, WRI, IUCN (1992). Global Biodiversity Strategy.
United Nations, p. 1.
 Ibid., p. 94.
 Ibid., p. 43.
 NIH, National Human Genome Research Institute,
 Annex V, Report of the Open-Ended Working Group on the
Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework on its Third Meeting
 Ibid. p. 35.