AMERICA TODAY IS A NATIONAL SOCIALIST’S DREAM COME true.
Individuals are computerized, databased, logged, and categorized. Video
cameras, motion sensors, metal detectors, and spy satellites monitor our
movements, while think tanks and foundations study our every habit. We are
constantly bombarded with “official” pronouncements and advertising.
Television is everywhere - in bars, waiting rooms, airports, and usually
constantly on in our very living rooms. In our fast-paced society, no one
has time to think, much less read deeply.
Business, especially corporate business, is king. Giant corporations,
governed by faceless directors answering to shadowy owners, control
everything, from water to wing nuts. Even the time-honored profession of
soldiering has been usurped by private corporate armies like
2007 already being accused of becoming America’s version of the Nazi Brownshirts.
Meanwhile, the American taxpayer is footing the bill, even though, as
convincingly shown in Aaron Russo’s 2006 documentary
America: Freedom to
Fascism, there is no law requiring Americans to pay an income tax.
course, the IRS, through its myriad rules and regulations, can drag into
court and even jail those who fail to fulfill “voluntary compliance.”
“[F]ascism’s principles are wafting in the air today, surreptitiously
masquerading as something else, challenging everything we stand for. The
cliché that people and nations learn from history is not only overused, but
also overestimated; often we fail to learn from history, or draw the wrong
conclusions. Sadly, historical amnesia is the norm,” stated author Dr.
Laurence W. Britt, in an article for Free Inquiry, a long-standing
publication of the Council for Secular Humanism, which promotes secular
Following a careful study of the regimes of Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy,
Franco’s Spain, Salazar’s Portugal, Papadopoulos’s Greece, Pinochet’s Chile,
and Suharto’s Indonesia, Britt concluded that these fascist governments had
“Analysis of these seven regimes reveals fourteen
common threads that link them in recognizable patterns of national behavior
and abuse of power,” he noted. “These basic characteristics are more
prevalent and intense in some regimes than in others, but they all share at
least some level of similarity.”
Britt’s fourteen characteristics of a fascist regime, many sounding
ominously close to what’s happening today in the United States, include:
Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism
From the prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel
pins, the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the
regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious.
Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common
themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a
suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.
such patriotic zeal may be found in the ever-present yellow ribbons showing
support for U.S. troops to the plethora of American flags and bunting at
large public events such as the Super Bowl.
Disdain for the importance of human rights
The regimes themselves viewed human rights as of little value and a
hindrance to realizing the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever
use of propaganda, the population was brought to accept these human rights
abuses by marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted.
was egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation. In
November 2007, former federal judge Michael B. Mukasey was sworn in as
attorney general of the United States, despite contentious confirmation
hearings focused on the issue of torturing prisoners.
He replaced Alberto R.
Gonzales, who was criticized for his part in crafting the Bush
administration’s secretive legal arguments permitting the torture of
Mukasey, who served eighteen years as judge of U.S. district court
for the Southern District of New York, presided over the trials of Omar
Abdel Rahman and El Sayyid Nosair, the convicted bombers of the World Trade
Center in 1993; the trial of José Padilla, the man declared an “enemy
combatant” by President Bush and the only person convicted in connection
with the 9/11 attacks; and the lawsuits between World Trade Center leaser
Larry Silverstein and several insurance companies over damages stemming from
the 9/11 attacks.
Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a
The most significant common thread among these regimes was the use of scapegoating as a means to divert the people’s attention from other
problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in
controlled directions. The methods of choice - relentless propaganda and
disinformation - were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite
“spontaneous” acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists,
socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional
national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals, and
“terrorists.” Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably labeled as
terrorists and dealt with accordingly. Examples of such tactics can be heard
from the mouths of those who constantly use racial slurs. Afghanistan’s
former “freedom fighters” have semantically changed into “insurgents” then
into “al-Qaeda terrorists” in the news columns, while such epitaphs as “rag
head” and “sand nigger” are commonly used in the general population.
The supremacy of the military and avid militarism
Ruling elites always
identified closely with the military and
the industrial infrastructure that supported it. A disproportionate share of
national resources was allocated to the military, even when domestic needs
were acute. The military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was
used whenever possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations,
and increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.
The U.S. military
budget for many years has consumed the bulk of the national spending.
President Bush’s 2008 budget provides $439.3 billion for the Department of
Defense’s base budget - a 7 percent increase over 2006 and a whopping 48
percent increase over 2001. This figure does not include military-related
expenditure such as nuclear weapons research or the wars in Afghanistan and
Neither does it count trust funds, anticipated costs of Social
Security, and Veterans Administration costs of services to veterans.
government practice of combining trust and federal funds began during the
Vietnam War, thus making the human-needs portion of the budget seem larger
and the military portion smaller,” according to literature from the War
Resisters League (WRL), an antiwar organization founded in 1923.
all government figures relating to the military, the WRL estimated that
more than half (51 percent) of all federal spending goes to the military.
Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and the national culture
were male- dominated, these regimes inevitably viewed women as second-class
citizens. They were adamantly anti-abortion and also homophobic. These
attitudes were usually codified in draconian laws that enjoyed strong
support by the orthodox religion of the country, thus lending the regime
cover for its abuses.
This practice is less prevalent in the United States
today, although many women still find it difficult to break through what has
been termed the “glass ceiling,” in which they can see higher positions in
the workplace but never seem to get there. Modern America also differs from
Nazi Germany and other cultures in that women are beginning to fill the
corporate chairs formerly held by men.
Many seem agreeable to advancing
fascist and globalist philosophy.
A controlled mass media
Under some of the regimes, the mass media were under strict direct control
and could be relied upon never to stray from the party line. Other regimes
exercised more subtle power to ensure media orthodoxy. Methods included the
control of licensing and access to resources, economic pressure, appeals to
patriotism, and implied threats.
The leaders of the mass media were oft en
politically compatible with the power elite. The result was usually
successful in keeping the general public unaware of the regimes’ excesses.
As previously detailed, the American corporate mass media today is
essentially in the hands of six giant multinational communications
The owners of these corporations are proponents of “free
trade” in business policies, yet coverage of alternative news and views is
“One of our best-kept secrets is the degree to which a
handful of huge corporations control the flow of information in the United
States. Whether it is television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, or
the Internet, a few giant conglomerates are determining what we see, hear,
and read. And the situation is likely to become much worse as a result of
radical deregulation efforts by the Bush administration and some horrendous
court decisions,” warned Congressman Bernie Sanders, adding, “This is an
issue that Congress can no longer ignore.”
Obsession with national security
Inevitably, a national security apparatus was under direct control of the
ruling elite. It was usually an instrument of oppression, operating in
secret and beyond any constraints. Its actions were justified under the
rubric of protecting “national security,” and questioning its activities was
labeled unpatriotic or even treasonous.
While all Americans should be
concerned about national security, many see it as a pretext to strip away
Thoughtful persons also worry about a man like
Michael Chertoff, son of a Jewish rabbi, who has been accused of having dual
citizenship (American and Israeli) and was a major architect of Bush
administration policies, being named secretary of the Homeland Security
Religion and ruling elite tied
Unlike communist regimes, the fascist and protofascist regimes were never
proclaimed godless by their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached
themselves to the predominant religion of the country and chose to portray
themselves as militant defenders of that religion.
The fact that the ruling
elite’s behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the religion was
generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the illusion that the
ruling elites were defenders of the faith and opponents of the “godless.” A
perception was manufactured that opposing the power elite was tantamount to
an attack on religion.
Earlier in this work, the obvious parallels have been
drawn between the use of religion in Nazi Germany and modern America to
support government policies.
Power of corporations protected
Although the personal life of ordinary citizens was under strict control,
the ability of large corporations to operate in relative freedom was not
compromised. The ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not
only ensure military production (in developed states) but also as an
additional means of social control. Members of the economic elite were often
pampered by the political elite to ensure a continued mutuality of
interests, especially in the repression of “have-not” citizens.
the Federalism Project of the American Enterprise Institute, a group that
conducts and sponsors original research on American federalism,
advocates, plaintiffs’ attorneys, and state officials argue that broad
federal preemption claims - often by federal regulatory agencies, without a
clear congressional mandate - interfere with the states’ historic role in
protecting citizens against corporate misconduct. Corporations and federal
agencies respond that preemption is often the only viable safeguard against
unwarranted state interferences with the national economy.”
In a 2006
article in the Los Angeles Times, Alan C. Miller and Myron Levin noted how a
series of steps by federal agencies were meant to “shield leading industries
from state regulation and civil lawsuits on the grounds that they conflict
with federal authority.”
Power of labor suppressed or eliminated
Since organized labor was seen as the one power center that could
challenge the political hegemony of the ruling elite and its corporate
allies, it was inevitably crushed or made powerless. The poor formed an
underclass that was viewed with suspicion or outright contempt. Under some
regimes, being poor was considered akin to a vice.
As previously noted, antilabor actions of the Bush administration prompted
Jack Heyman, an official of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, to state that,
is effectively declaring war on the working class here.”
Those with long
memories know that labor news has largely dropped from the mainstream
media’s radar screen.
Disdain and suppression of
intellectuals and the arts
Intellectuals, and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression associated
with them, were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and academic freedom
were considered subversive to national security and the patriotic ideal.
Universities were tightly controlled, politically unreliable faculty
harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or expressions of dissent were
strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed.
To these regimes, art and
literature had to serve the national interest or they had no right to exist.
In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, many conservative groups on college
campuses denounced academic freedom, according to a report by John K.
Wilson, coordinator of the Independent Press Association’s Campus Journalism
Other academics were fired or reprimanded for merely speaking out
on the issues of war or questioning the official story of 9/11.
Obsession with crime and punishment
Most of these regimes maintained draconian systems of criminal justice, with
huge prison populations. The police were oft en glorified and had almost
unchecked power, leading to rampant abuse. “Normal” and political crime were
often merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used against
political opponents of the regime.
Fear and hatred of criminals or
“traitors” was often promoted among the population as an excuse for more
police power. The United States today has a higher incarcerated population
than all Europe an jails combined, and in certain areas, such as Washington,
D.C., police presence is at an all-time high.
One visitor to Washington in
the summer of 2007 asked a police officer why there were so many cops
“People would rather have security than freedom.”
Rampant cronyism and corruption
Those in business circles and close to the power elite oft en used their
position to enrich themselves. This corruption worked both ways: the power
elite would receive financial gift s and property from the economic elite,
who in turn would gain the benefit of government favoritism. Members of the
power elite were in a position to obtain vast wealth from other sources as
well: for example, by stealing national resources.
With the national
security apparatus under control and the media muzzled, this corruption was
largely unconstrained and not well understood by the general population.
cronyism and outright nepotism of the Bush administration has been well
documented. Elizabeth Cheney, the vice president’s daughter, was named as a
deputy secretary of state in late February 2002, and within about a week,
her husband, Philip Perry, became chief counsel for the Office of
Management and Budget, where he joined director Mitchell Daniels, whose
sister Deborah is an assistant attorney general.
“That’s just the
beginning,” noted Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank. “Among Deborah
Daniels’ colleagues at Justice is young Chuck James, whose mother, Kay Coles
James, is the director of the Office of Personnel Management, and whose
father, Charles Sr., is a top Labor Department official.
Charles James Sr.’s
boss, Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao, knows about having family members in
government: Her husband is [Kentucky] Sen. Mitch McConnell and her
department’s top lawyer, Labor Solicitor Eugene Scalia, is the son of
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. . . . Ken Mehlman, the White House
political director, regularly calls his younger brother Bruce, an assistant
commerce secretary, to get his input.”
Former secretary of state Colin L.
Powell is the father of Michael Powell, who chaired the Federal
Communications Commission. An informal survey of 415 historians conducted by
George Mason University’s History News Network found that eight in ten, or
81 percent, of the responding historians rated Bush’s presidency as an
One respondent to the survey wrote that Bush “ranks with U.
S. Grant as the worst. His oil interests and Cheney’s corporate Halliburton
contracts smack of the same corruption found under Grant.”
Central to this
belief were the numerous Bush administration scandals, including:
that preceded the invasion of Iraq
the Abu Ghraib mistreatment of
pre-9/11 intelligence failures
the $2.3 trillion missing from
the Pentagon, announced by Donald Rumsfeld the day before 9/11
mishandling of the Katrina disaster, which resulted in the resignation of
Bush’s appointee Michael D. Brown as director of FEMA
prescription drug plan that shifted 6.2 million low-income seniors whose
medications had been covered by Medicare over to private insurers
the non-competition government contracts to Halliburton,
Dick Cheney’s former
the substitution of political ideals for science
In 2004, the
Union of Concerned Scientists issued a statement blasting the
administration’s politicization of science. Ultimately, this statement was
signed by 4,062 scientists, including 51 Nobel laureates, 63 National Medal
of Science recipients, and 195 members of the National Academies.
Buzzflash.com, which styles itself as
marketplace for progressives, after listing
several debacles and scandals of the Bush administration, said it operated
in a “culture of cronyism and corruption.”
Elections in the form of plebiscites or public opinion polls were usually
bogus. When actual elections with candidates were held, they would, as a
rule, be perverted by the power elite to get the desired result.
methods included maintaining control of the election machinery, intimidating
and disenfranchising opposition voters, destroying or disallowing legal
votes, and, as a last resort, turning to a judiciary beholden to the power
Americans are well aware of the controversies concerning the presidential
elections of 2000 and 2004. George W. Bush’s first term was decided by the
Supreme Court, not the voters. And it was just as bad in 2004.
Kennedy Jr., writing in Rolling Stone magazine, stated,
prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having
their votes counted - enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.”
Controversy over both elections continues today and in 2008 charges of vote
fraud were already being voiced in the state primary elections, primarily
over computer voting machines.
Many Americans noticed the similarities between George W. Bush’s unprovoked
attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq and Hitler’s unprovoked attacks on Poland,
the Low Countries, and France. In both cases, the pretext for invasion
proved false and reservists were used rather than the option to resort to a
military draft .
In early 2008, a study by the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity
documented 935 “false statements” by the Bush administration in the months
leading up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
“Nearly five years after the U.S.
invasion of Iraq, an exhaustive examination of the record shows that the
statements were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively
galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under
decidedly false pretenses,” stated the CPI report. Most people would term
this telling lies.
“DOES ANY OF this ring alarm bells?” asked Britt. “Of course not. After
all, this is America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a
constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public
constantly being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like
these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not.”
It seems that by comparing Britt’s characteristics of fascism to current
events, the argument can definitely be made that globalist fascists are
turning the once free and independent United States into a not-so-profitable subsidiary of their global corporate structure
- their empire of the
You are free to accept this idea or not. But when secular humanists,
conservative Christians, Jews, liberal Democrats, bedrock Republicans, and
moderates, not to mention the activist fringe elements, all start issuing
the same warning against fascism, perhaps it is time we start paying serious
Noam Chomsky and
Gore Vidal have spoken out
against the “national security state” from the left. The late Senator
Barry Goldwater and evangelist Pat Robertson have spoken out from the right.
Even mainstream centrists, like commentator Bill Moyers and attorney
Spence, have warned of the abuses of a “secret government.”
figures along with concerned citizens from opposite ends of the political
spectrum all say the same thing, it is time to consider the true state of
the American union. And perhaps time to stand up and be counted for true
freedom - freedom from the corporate state.
The Reverend Erwin W. Lutzer, senior pastor of Moody Church in Chicago,
“We must support our government, but we must be ready to criticize it
or even defy it when necessary. Patriotism is commendable when it is for a
just cause. Every nation has the right to defend itself, the right to expect
the government to do what is best for its citizens. However, if the German
church has taught us the dangers of blind obedience to government, we must
eschew the mindless philosophy ‘My country, right or wrong.’”
Media critic Michael Parenti observes,
“To oppose the policies of a
government does not mean you are against the country or the people that the
government supposedly represents. Such opposition should be called what it
really is: democracy, or democratic dissent, or having a critical
perspective about what your leaders are doing. Either we have the right to
democratic dissent and criticism of these policies or we all lie down and
let the leader, the fuehrer, do what is best, while we follow uncritically,
and obey whatever he commands. That’s just what the Germans did with Hitler,
and look where it got them.”
There are those who would argue that it is perhaps unpatriotic or at least
not politically correct to speak out on issues involving taxation,
immigration, political beliefs, race, eugenics, or criticism of the
military- industrial complex.
The term “political correctness,” which has entered today’s discourse, is
defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary as,
“conforming to a belief that
language and practices which could offend political sensibilities (as in
matters of sex or race) should be eliminated.”
Today many believe that
definition has grown to include the perceived need to conform to
restrictions on speech and behavior set by politicians, corporate leaders,
and other self-appointed authorities.
This is the same self-imposed
restriction that was adopted by too many Germans during the Third Reich. Not
only was the man on the street afraid to speak out against the Nazi regime
but free speech was denied the intelligentsia.
Nazi academic Walter Schultze
in 1939 stated that,
“the reorganization of the entire university system must
begin with people who understand that freedom has limits and conform to
National Socialist thinking.”
Germans in the Third Reich did not know the
term “political correctness,” but they well understood the penalties for
freely voicing their opinions.
Recent legislation targeting so- called hate speech can easily slip into
official punitive action against any speech that arouses the ire of
politicians, police, or judges.
Jonathan Rauch writing in Harper’s magazine
noted that equating verbal violence with physical violence is a
“treacherous, mischievous business.”
Rauch quoted author Salman Rushdie, who
was sentenced to death in absentia by Muslim ayatollahs after writing a book
they claimed slandered the beliefs of millions of Muslims.
“What is freedom
of expression?” asked Salman Rushdie. “Without the freedom to offend, it
ceases to exist.”
Rauch wrote that the public should learn a lesson from
Rushdie’s experience. Rauch proclaimed:
“The campaigns to eradicate
prejudice - all of them, the speech codes and workplace restrictions and
mandatory therapy for accused bigots and all the rest - should stop, now. The
whole objective of eradicating prejudice, as opposed to correcting and
criticizing it, should be repudiated as a fool’s errand.”
Even though the German Nazis preached the unity of the Volk and spoke out
against the old divisions of class and education, the leaders operated in an
entirely different manner.
“In reality, the Third Reich was a network of
rival leaders, each with his own followers and his own patronage,” noted
George Mosse in his book Nazi Culture. “Hitler kept them competing against
one another and in this way was able to control the whole leadership
Likewise, the globalist rulers of America pit bureaucrats, politicians,
academics, corporate leaders, and the public against one another in an
agenda of divide and conquer. They maintain control in a society fragmented
by combative ideologies and philosophies as well as competing corporate
interests. In today’s America it seems the only common denominator is
consumerism and debt.
Because of their loss of control over Hitler, the globalists learned well
the dangers of allowing any one individual to gain the power over masses of
people. Consequently, there has not been one prominent figure in recent
American history who has commanded the popular respect and esteem of a
majority of the population. Even the assassinated President John
F. Kennedy, beloved by so many, never held popular goodwill to the extent of
Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Since World War II, no national leader has gained
the stature of Roosevelt, Churchill, or Hitler.
“Hitler’s world has gone forever. But many of the basic attitudes and
prejudices which went into his worldview are still with us, waiting to be
actualized, to be directed into a new mass consciousness,” prophesied
Professor Mosse from the relatively naive year of 1966.
Ladislas Farago, author of Aftermath: Martin Bormann and the Fourth Reich,
“The despicable forces loosed by the Third Reich are not expunged,
although, like some virulent virus, they may have changed to other forms and
be difficult to identify. They remain malignant and as potentially dangerous
In his 1997 book The Beast Reawakens, Martin Lee wrote,
is on the march again... unchecked corporate power has, to a significant
degree, stultified the democratic process, and fascist groups in Europe and
the United States feed upon this malaise.”
These sentiments came from
writers unaware of the fascist globalists’ plan being woven around them.
Yet, they could sense that Americans could easily fall sway to the
pernicious ideology of National Socialism.
THE BIGGEST STUMBLING block to the plans of the globalists has
always been the United States, with its tradition of individual freedom, its
Constitution that guarantees that freedom, and the fact that so many
Americans own firearms to protect their freedoms. But true freedom is a
National politicians no longer refer to the “republic,” because modern
America has ceased to be one. It is now an empire - a new Reich.
Obviously, there are dissimilarities between Hitler’s Third Reich and the
new American Reich. After all, the United States today is a very different
time and culture. But it has been demonstrated how the same philosophies and
methodologies employed by the same families, corporations, and organizations
that at one time supported Hitler’s Third Reich, have now found roots in
It has been necessary for these fascist globalists to break up the United
States into divisions of race, sex, age, generation and culture. This has
been accomplished through a degrading of popular culture, downgrading the
education process, permitting a steady flow of illegal immigrants, and the
fragmentation of the population over issues such as abortion, immigration,
nonheterosexual relationships, and foreign policy.
Control over a diminished
national economy and corporate downsizing has brought undue stress on
workers, resulting in the gradual destruction of the nuclear family.
None of this construction of the new American empire has come about
The global National Socialists - Nazis - are in it for the long haul. The owners of the multinational corporations, with their membership in secret
societies, know their goals will not be achieved overnight, although since
9/11 they seem to have redoubled their efforts, speeding up the timetable.
While businessmen deal with yearly quarters, and the average worker lives
for his weekly paycheck, these people look ahead fifty years or a hundred,
if that’s what it takes.
They realize that their program of a global fascist
socialism is the only means of maintaining their power and control, the only
way - in their view - to maintain the purity of their race and class. They laugh
at the concepts of true individual freedom and multiculturalism, for they
have no faith in the innate goodness of humankind or its ability for
They have no real faith in God and use religious ideals and
concepts merely as another tool for social control.
The struggle against such steadfast will to power and its attendant control
will not be easy. Sacrifices and change will have to be made in all areas of
society. Lifestyles will have to be altered. But it can be done - hopefully
before the United States falls into depression, anarchy, and then a police
state. New energy sources and technologies are lurking in the wings.
Technological breakthroughs await only the change of attitude on the part of
conventional politics, commerce, and finance.
A sea change in the public consciousness is well under way, although it is
not reflected in the corporate-controlled mass media. Yet it is happening.
Informed consumers are beginning to realize they can vote with their
spending. If enough people refuse to buy a certain product - whether it’s a
brand of car, gasoline, or something else - or even reject a federal policy
proposal, it can force a change of direction in the controllers.
We may do well to recall the words of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who
had to deal with a previous “New World Order.”
In a 1940 address, he stated,
“The history of recent years proves that the shootings and the chains and
the concentration camps are not simply the transient tools but the very
altars of modern dictatorships. They may talk of a ‘new order’ in the world,
but what they have in mind is only a revival of the oldest and the worst
In that there is no liberty, no religion, no hope. The proposed
‘new order’ is the very opposite of a United States of Europe or a United
States of Asia. It is not a government based upon the consent of the
governed. It is not a union of ordinary, self-respecting men and women to
protect themselves and their freedom and their dignity from oppression. It
is an unholy alliance of power and self to dominate and to enslave the human
It appears that the “New World Order” is really just
the “Old World Order”
packaged with modern advertising slickness - new names, logos, and slogans.
What once was traditional American conservatism has been molded into fascist
forms, beginning with the infusion of National Socialism ideals into the
military-industrial complex, which then spread into science, corporate life,
the mass media, and even political parties.
This change has been engineered by the
globalist elite who hold monopolies
over basic resources, energy, pharmaceuticals, transportation, and
telecommunications, including the news media.
As detailed throughout this
work, the same men, families, and companies that first supported communism
in Russia funded and supported National Socialism in prewar Germany. With
the defeat of the Germans, they simply shifted their attention to the
United States. They were abetted by Nazis financed by the stolen wealth of
Europe - perhaps including Solomon’s treasure - and utilizing a vast network of
Thousands of Nazis escaped to both North and South
America, their way facilitated by supporters in Wall Street, the Bank of En
gland, and the Vatican.
Using German advances in the study of the human mind, behavior, and
propaganda, these self-styled globalists are now attempting to subdue the
American population through a maze of government policies, drugs, a
dumbed-down education system, and a controlled corporate mass media.
Political and corporate leadership continually swap roles, creating a merger
of the state and industry - the very definition of fascism.
leveraged takeovers have concentrated corporate power into fewer and fewer
hands, many of those directly connected through banking and corporate ties
to prewar support for the Nazis.
Law enforcement personnel increasingly no
longer wear the blue uniforms of police sworn “to serve and protect,” but
black body armor with the German-style military helmets, initially dubbed
the “Fritz” by the soldiers. Even the fields of religion, education, and
entertainment are being used to transform whole generations of formerly free
Americans into cowed and subservient members of an increasingly National
Is the new American Empire, as it is described in numerous books and
articles, in danger of becoming an empire of the wealthy - a fascist Fourth
Hitler’s Thousand-year Reich collapsed
after a mere twelve years. How
long before the end of the
New World Order’s Fourth Reich in America?
An account of the fall of the Fourth Reich has not yet been written, for it
has yet to happen.
If, and how, this is to be accomplished, is up to you,