extracted from Chapter 19 of
The media is the force that holds the whole Matrix together. That's why the Illuminati own it. Without the minute by minute flow of Matrix propaganda through the global media, the power of the illusion would be nothing like as fundamental as it is. You don't have to control every journalist to dictate what the public will or will not hear.
If journalists were open-minded, thinking, intelligent, people who care about freedom, there would not be a problem.
But most of them aren't and those who are aware and try to tell some real truths soon realize what a prison of expression they work in. I was a journalist for years and I know how uninformed they are about the world outside the morning papers or the TV news.
I have seen them at work from the other side since I began to communicate this information and it is a stunning experience to view at close hand the intellect that stands between what is happening in the world and what the people are told is happening. And I am talking about top television correspondents as well as the propaganda fodder on the large and small newspapers.
There are basically two types of personality who reach the top in journalism, and politics come to that:
The British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his deputy, John Prescott, are perfect examples of both kinds and journalists are precisely the same. And yet these are the people who tell us every day what to think about people and events.
As the old saying goes:
Journalists in general are, like most politicians, some of the most uninformed people on the planet.
They are slaves to the Illuminati "norms", the mental and emotional sheep-pen. Once the norms are set of what is right and wrong, good and bad, possible or impossible, the media report the world from that perspective. They are clones of the Matrix. A few centuries ago today's media would have ridiculed and condemned as dangerous anyone who said that the Earth was not flat.
Why? For no other reason than the "norm", the accepted "truth" of the official establishment system, was that the Earth was indeed flat.
Because the "journalists" report everything from the perspective of the "norms" in every generation, it means that anything that is different is always dubbed either dangerous or dotty. Or, in my case, both. They don't do any research into whether that which is different is actually true.
They assume it must be wrong simply because it is so different. And, of course, they have the ultimate self-delusion of believing that because they are "journalists" they would know about it if it were true.
Ask a journalist about the Bilderberg Group and see his or her eyes glaze over. "Bilder-what?"
I have tried it over and over across the world and I have yet to find one, one, who has heard of it. But at the same time they dismiss conspiracy information as a dotty and paranoid "theory".
if you were the Illuminati wishing to keep people in ignorance, is
not this the very mentality you would want to have working for your
media? Of course it is, and that's why we have it.
The "Independent" newspaper group is owned by an Illuminati frontman called Tony O'Reilly, who also owns a list of media operations around the world, including the main newspaper group in South Africa. O'Reilly, who loves to show off his connections to people like Henry Kissinger, is a close friend of Robert Mugabe, the corrupt and vicious dictator in Zimbabwe. Yep, what a perfect man to own the "Independent" newspaper.
Anyway, this chap Cowley calls me and says he's coming to my talk in the Isle of Wight I mentioned earlier. My first impressions were not good. He had no interest in what I was saying and changed the subject whenever I got into any substance. He said he wanted to write a "philosophical piece".
Now this, in journalistic-speak, means:
Like the facts. I have had so much shit written about and thrown at me over the years by those of Jason Cowley's mentality, and I knew that he was preparing to throw some more. These days I can see them a mile off because they're such transparent people.
I said to a friend:
Cowley also told me that he was "coming with an open mind", and that's always a red flag to me. I wish I had a dollar for every journalist I have met with a concrete mind who assured me that he or she was coming with an open one. So along he came. He was actually planning to arrive at the talk some three hours after the start and then write his article about what I was saying!
It was only when I pointed out how ludicrous and unacceptable this was, that he agreed to try to get there earlier. This is simply confirmed clearly that my first impression had been correct. He didn't give a damn what I was saying, he had the article and its theme in his head already. Most of them do. Even then he spent long periods of the day outside the theatre and so could not hear the evidence I was presenting.
What an insult to his readers and what contempt he must have for
them to behave in that way.
He spoke to me for around 40 minutes about my own mental state (I'm different, so I must be mad) and an amazing experience that happened to me in Peru in 1991 (none of which he quoted). I was not asked a single question about the conspiracy.
From all this "research" by Jason Cowley, one of the least intelligent "journalists" I have met in my own experience, the following was published as fact:
This was written by a man who doesn't know what I am saying because he couldn't be bothered to find out. He ended by concluding that perhaps the biggest secret is that there is no secret and that there was no unified field encompassing everything. Some brilliant and open-minded real scientists would be very surprised to hear that, but who can doubt the all-knowing, non-researching, Mr Cowley or the journalistic herd in which he operates?
The problem with my ideas, he said, was that they were based on no sacred texts or a belief in a single deity. He had just attended a talk (or rather not) in which I said all that exists is one infinite consciousness.
He quoted G.K. Chesterton in support of his view of my "problem":
So if you don't believe in an official
version of God, you are not to be taken seriously.
This, ladies and gentlemen of the Matrix, is the mentality that keeps the people enslaved in the illusion because he is not the exception, he is the rule all over the world.
The blind leading the blind and the bland leading the bland. I spoke in the talk about famous people sacrificing and abusing children, people like Ted Heath.
All this specific information and detail was dismissed as me having a conspiracy theory for everything. That was it.
Cowley, like 95% of his fellow "journalists", is not intelligent
enough to realize that he is a gatekeeper of other people's minds,
as well as his own. But, like I say, he's the norm, not the
exception. I don't think that Mr Cowley and his like would know how
to be an exception. They live in the world dictated by norms and
then confirm and perpetuate them for other people.
I offered to put him in touch with
victims and those involved directly who could tell him more. I gave
him my number to call me for their names and contact addresses. He
never called. He just went away and the following Sunday wrote an
article that took the piss.
These news agencies have correspondents in every country and when a major event happens there, the report of that one journalist is sent all around the world to every major news organization. If that one journalist gets it wrong, or has an agenda, every newspaper, radio, and television news bulletin, gets it wrong or communicates the desired spin.
Every hour on radio stations across this planet, newsreaders are ripping pre-written news bulletins from the teleprinter and reading them as truth. In the BBC in the UK, this process is actually known as "rip n' read". The person reading that "news" has no idea who wrote it or from what source it came, never mind if it is accurate.
The listeners hear this "news" and it affects their view of life, people, and the world. That's why we have to question everything we are told through such sources. Just listen to any television news report and invariably the journalist will have taken the official version of the event and put this in his or her own words.
We now have the policy of the newsreader interviewing a reporter about people and events instead of the people directly involved.
The reporter is not trying to dupe people or give false information. But he gets his information from official sources and so he becomes a mouthpiece for the official version of events.
This happens every day. He is not an independent observer and reporter, he is little more than a public relations man for the official version that they want the public to believe.
When a BBC reporter called Peter Snow tried to report the Falklands War impartially, and used phrases like the British Government claims or says, rather than accepting its accuracy without question, he was castigated by the government and the rest of the media for being anti-British!
The men and women of
the global media, with a few very honorable exceptions, are some of
the key gatekeepers for the Matrix and some of the most deluded of
the Matrix mentality.
At least he had the guts to change his mind and he will not be the last as the evidence becomes more and more obvious. When it does, the Cowleys, Taylors, Warmans, and Farbers will have all those abused children to answer to. I trust they will have a good excuse prepared for looking the other way and ridiculing the evidence of this abuse while doing no research to see if it is true. Or, in the case of Warman and Farber, vociferously seeking to suppress exposure of the children's plight.
In so many ways, the global media is the Matrix and the global journalistic herd are its, largely unknowing, propaganda machine.