JUAN GONZALEZ
		
		Investors at the CIA and Google are 
		both backing a company that claims to represent the next phase of 
		intelligence gathering, according to a report from Wired. 
		 
		
		It’s called Recorded Future, and it monitors 
		tens of thousands of websites, blogs and Twitter accounts in real time 
		in order to find patterns, events and relationships that may predict the 
		future. Google has done business with America’s spy agencies before, but 
		this seems to be the first time the CIA and Google have funded the same 
		startup at the same time.
		
		The report comes on the heels of a new opinion poll released by the 
		nonpartisan group Consumer Watchdog that shows nearly two-thirds of 
		Americans are troubled by what’s being called Google’s "Wi-Spy" scandal. 
		Wi-Spy refers to revelations that Google’s Street View cars operating in 
		some thirty countries snooped on private Wi-Fi networks over the last 
		three years. 
		 
		
		Google has admitted that its cars recorded 
		communications from unencrypted home Wi-Fi networks as they photographed 
		people’s homes for Google’s Street View.
 
		
		
		AMY GOODMAN
		
		Well, for more, we’re joined now by two 
		guests. Here in New York, Noah Shachtman’s with us. He’s contributing 
		editor at Wired magazine and editor of its national security blog, "http://www.wired.com/dangerroom 
		Danger Room," where he broke the story about Google and the CIA both 
		investing in Recorded Future. 
		 
		
		And we’re joined in Los Angeles by John 
		Simpson, director of Consumer Watchdog’s Inside Google project. He’s 
		calling for congressional hearings into the Google Wi-Spy scandal.
		
		We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Noah, let’s start with you. Just 
		lay out what this relationship is. There may be people who don’t even 
		know that Street View of Google, that you can go down the streets of New 
		York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and see people’s houses. 
		
		 
		
		And what else 
		did they record?
		
		NOAH SCHACHTMAN
		
		Right, so, you know, Google - we sort of 
		make an implicit bargain with Google, right? Google reads our email to 
		deliver advertisements. They look at how we’re traveling from point A to 
		point B as they - as we use Google Maps. 
		 
		
		They look at our searches as we use Google 
		Search. So we make - they read all that information, but we make a 
		bargain with them that they’re not going to do anything too bad with it, 
		that they’re going to observe their “don’t be evil” mantra. 
		 
		
		And that’s why this latest business 
		arrangement is kind of troubling.
 
		
		
		AMY GOODMAN
		
		John Simpson, go further with the Street 
		View and what you found with Wi-Spy.
		
		JOHN SIMPSON
		
		Sure. What most people, I think, realized 
		was that indeed these trucks and vans were taking photographs, but it 
		then developed that they were recording data from open Wi-Fi networks 
		and gathering other information about Wi-Fi networks as they went along.
		
		 
		
		Initially, Google said that they were just 
		locating the networks. And then they said, “Oh, my gosh! We made a 
		mistake. We were actually gathering data,” which seems 
		tremendously disingenuous when you...
 
		
		
		AMY GOODMAN
		
		Explain exactly what you mean when you say 
		they’re - 
		
		JOHN SIMPSON
		
		...learn that they in fact patented the..
 
		
		
		AMY GOODMAN
		
		John, explain exactly what you mean when you 
		say there weren’t just taking pictures, but they were gathering data 
		from the Wi-Fi networks as they passed your house.
		
		JOHN SIMPSON
		
		Well, sure, if you - if you have a Wi-Fi 
		network and you’re sending email messages over it, passwords are going 
		through it when you log on to websites, any of that sort of 
		communications could be sucked up by their Wi-Spy snooping. 
		 
		
		And not only would it be sucked up, it was 
		recorded on their servers. So there are parts of people’s personal 
		communication that they have in their server network. And what they’re 
		doing with that information is part of the problem. No one from Google 
		has said why they were gathering it, what they intended to do with it, 
		and what they have done with it. 
		 
		
		They’ve essentially said, “Trust us. We’re 
		the company that believes 'don’t be evil.'”
		 
		
		
		
		JUAN GONZALEZ
		
		And when you say they’re storing it in their 
		servers, one of the amazing things to me has been, as I’ve learned more 
		about Google, that they virtually have created these huge tank farms all 
		around the United States where they are storing all this data, and 
		they’re collecting basically more information on the American people and 
		on - in the world than practically any other company right now.
		
		Noah Shachtman, I’m particularly interested in this issue of this new 
		company, Recorded Future. 
		 
		
		How exactly will - how exactly is Recorded 
		Future working? What are they doing with the information they’re 
		gathering now for both the CIA - with CIA investment and with Google 
		investment?
		
		NOAH SCHACHTMAN
		
		So, Recorded Future is a company that strips 
		out from web pages the sort of who, what, when, where, why - sort of 
		who’s involved, you know, where are they going, what kind of events are 
		they going to. 
		 
		
		And the idea is to find hidden links between 
		actors that might not necessarily have visible links between them. So, 
		for example, if I’m going to Aruba and there happens to be, I don’t 
		know, you know, a terrorism conference in Aruba, perhaps I’m going to 
		that terrorism conference. 
		 
		
		That’s sort of the idea.
 
		
		
		AMY GOODMAN
		
		And how is CIA and Google working together?
		
		NOAH SCHACHTMAN
		
		So, most people don’t realize that the 
		intelligence agencies have an investment arm. It’s called 
		
		In-Q-Tel. And 
		they invest money in promising companies, both to make a little cash and 
		also to deliver those promising technologies to the intelligence 
		community. 
		 
		
		So, in the early part of this decade, for 
		example, In-Q-Tel invested in a company called 
		
		Keyhole. Keyhole was then 
		bought by Google in 2004 and became the basis of Google Earth, which is 
		now how we can look at all those satellite cameras and what eventually 
		became the basis for the Street View project, right? 
		
		 
		
		And what Street 
		View is, is it’s part of Google Maps. 
		 
		
		It’s a way of - instead of looking at how 
		you get from point A to point B, it’s a way to actually see the streets 
		that you’re navigating. And so, when Google was taking pictures to 
		develop that sort of 3-D view of the streets you travel on, that’s when 
		it got into trouble collecting this Wi-Fi information. 
		 
		
		So that’s how it kind of all ties together.
 
		
		
		AMY GOODMAN
		
		And, of course, there’s a higher-level, much 
		larger secret intelligence agency, and it’s the National Security 
		Agency.
		
		NOAH SCHACHTMAN
		
		Right. So, Google, its relationship with 
		the NSA is unclear, as most things with the NSA are unclear. We know that 
		they’ve done business together before. We know that Google sold them 
		some products before, some servers. And we also know - excuse me - or we 
		believe we know, that when Google suffered a pretty vicious hack attack 
		earlier this year, it turned to the NSA. 
		 
		
		It turned to sort of the information 
		security specialists of the NSA to help them out and try to figure out 
		what was going on. Now, it gets a little bit complicated because that 
		side of the NSA is not quite as black hat as the side that spies on us. 
		There’s actually kind of two divisions within the NSA, one that’s 
		relatively benign and one that’s relatively not benign. 
		 
		
		But it’s still - It’s yet another example of 
		how Google and the country’s intelligence agencies are starting to get 
		closer and closer together.
		 
		
		
		
		JUAN GONZALEZ
		
		Have there been any attempts in other 
		countries to begin to place limits on some of this cooperation between 
		Google and - or their being able to use what they’re doing here in the 
		United States, has spread to other countries?
		
		NOAH SCHACHTMAN
		
		You know, the answer, I’m sure, is yes, but 
		I don’t have details, I’m sorry.
 
		
		
		AMY GOODMAN
		
		Well, let me ask John Simpson, what are you 
		calling on Congress to do?
		
		JOHN SIMPSON
		
		Well, we want to know exactly what Google 
		was trying to do when it sucked up all this personal communications when 
		it was doing the Wi-Spying. And we’re also very concerned about 
		precisely the nature of this growing relationship between our 
		intelligence agencies and Google. And we think that both of those things 
		need to be a subject of a hearing. 
		 
		
		Just like Tony Hayward came in and had to 
		explain 
		the Gulf oil spill, we think that Chairman Eric Schmidt needs to 
		be called before the appropriate committee to explain what I think is 
		the biggest information spill, if you will, in history. It’s virtually 
		wiretapping, what they were doing with the Wi-Fi networks. 
		 
		
		And they need to be called on the carpet to 
		account for that and why they did it. And so far there’s been no 
		adequate explanation of what they were trying to do.
 
		
		
		AMY GOODMAN
		
		Who was championing this in Congress?
		
		JOHN SIMPSON
		
		The more troubling aspect, too...
 
		
		
		AMY GOODMAN
		
		John, who was championing this in Congress? 
		And what is Google’s response, not to mention the intelligence agency, 
		if you can gather this, to your Inside Google project at Consumer 
		Watchdog?
		
		JOHN SIMPSON
		
		Well, Google has not been our best friend, 
		you could say. In fact, early on, when we put out a press release they 
		didn’t like, they actually tried to get our charitable funding revoked - 
		contacted the Rose Foundation and suggested we ought not to be funded, 
		which was not very good. 
		 
		
		In Congress, so far, we have not had any one 
		respond to the call. We believe that the appropriate committee would be 
		Commerce and the House Energy and Commerce Committee, possibly House 
		Judiciary Committee, because they have jurisdiction over wiretap 
		legislation. So, we’re still optimistic, particularly when, in the light 
		of our poll, we had overwhelming support for some kind of a hearing from 
		the voters that we polled. 
		 
		
		We think possibly when the Congress-people 
		are back in their districts, maybe they will indeed hear some of the 
		concern from their constituents. So we’re optimistic that there will be 
		a hearing.
 
		
		
		AMY GOODMAN
		
		John Simpson, I want to thank you for being 
		with us, director of Inside Google project at Consumer Watchdog. And 
		also thanks to Noah Shachtman, contributing editor at Wired Magazine.
		
		White House visitor logs show that Alan Davidson, Google’s director of 
		public policy and government affairs, has had at least three meetings 
		with officials of the National Security Council since the beginning of 
		last year. And John Simpson also has written that based on today’s 
		Washington Post series, it appears Google holds classified US government 
		contracts to supply search and geospatial information to the US 
		government. 
		 
		
		That series, they did last week.