The Ukrainian crisis?
		 
		
		It is basically the opposite 
		of what the media and politicians keep repeating both in the US and 
		Europe. They say that the so-called International community have 
		isolated Russia and Vladimir Putin.
		
		In fact it is the real sponsors of the coup d'état and the violence in 
		Ukraine who are isolated not only morally but also strategically.
		
		And it is Putin, the first leader who resisted and defeated the strategy 
		of world domination, who is enjoying the enthusiastic support of his 
		people and the growing admiration of the world. 
		 
		
		The
		
		well financed media and politicians do 
		not want to hear this, but this is the reality. Without exaggeration, 
		one can compare this resistance to that against Napoleon and Hitler…
		
		Only few know precisely how dangerous the situation has been. How close 
		to a real war.
		
		The incompetent representatives of the 'international community' lost 
		any sense of reality and deployed the weapons of social destabilization, 
		armed insurrection, assassination by snipers, a fascist March on Kiev 
		reminiscent of Mussolini's March on Rome, targeting of the Russian 
		population.
		
		They intended to give Russia the Libya treatment, and they did not make 
		a secret of it.
		
		After the assurances given by 
		
		George H.W. Bush to Mikhail 
		Gorbachev that NATO couldn't be used for a push toward East, 
		successive US governments did exactly that. 
		 
		
		Their objective is to surround Russia. With 
		the smiling hypocrisy of hyenas, they made clear that there was no 
		alternative but to surrender to the military power and propaganda 
		capabilities of NATO.
		
		No compromise, no negotiations. Or better when negotiations took place 
		like on Feb 21, the neo-Nazi gangs in Kiev were incited to escalate the 
		armed violence and take over the Parliament and Government buildings, 
		beating and intimidating whoever did not agree.
		
		The Western "diplomats" immediately recognized the neo-Nazi coup d'état 
		as the legitimate government. 
		 
		
		
		
		Yatsenyuk, the candidate of 
		
		Victoria Nuland, declared himself 
		Prime Minister while members of the parliament were brutally beaten in 
		the street, their houses invaded and violated, their families 
		terrorized… to ensure their support for the democratic process…
		
		These criminal politicians even pushed the situation close to a real 
		nuclear war. 
		 
		
		Putin made clear that Russia - which had 
		lost a large percentage of its population in the war against Nazism and 
		accepted to see Moscow in flames in order to defeat the superior forces 
		of Napoleon - was not going to surrender. 
		 
		
		That moment was more dangerous than the 1962 
		Cuban missile crisis. 
		 
		
		Putin called their bluff… Then, while the 
		Crimean (and not only Crimean) population asked for protection against 
		the NATO-supported armed gangs, the propaganda machine went into full 
		speed in the West, but it was too late. In this sense Putin not only 
		saved Russia, but gave a chance to the whole of Europe… like in WWII
		
		The fascist armed insurrection and the Kiev coup were not simply a war 
		against Russia, they were also a war against Europe. Not the EU 
		bureaucracy in Brussels, whose loyalty lies with the big financial 
		institutions, but the Europe of the various countries reduced to misery 
		and despair by austerity measures and the economic looting of Wall 
		Street and the city of London.
		
		Ukraine has been destabilized in order to make sure that Europe would be 
		in a perennial war with Russia.
		
		In fact, both, the interests of Europe and that of Russia, lie in a 
		common economic plan for the development of the whole area. This is what 
		was proposed by Putin and by several leaders such as former German 
		chancellors Helmut Kohl and Gerhard Schroeder. 
		 
		
		This is exactly what had to be prevented 
		with the Victoria Nuland $5 billion 'to help democracy.' And now, 
		despite all the noises and rhetoric, this is the most obvious direction 
		to go.
		
		The most important point to understand is that this war and looting 
		policy is not in the interest of the Europeans or even of the Americans.
		
		This is the big secret that now cannot be covered anymore. 
		
			
				- 
				
				The governments of the US and the 
				European countries are NOT independent entities, they are not 
				sovereign.  
- 
				
				They do not have the will or even 
				the ability to act on behalf of their people.  
- 
				
				They are controlled by
				
				powerful banking interests.
				 
- 
				
				They have been taken over by two 
				financial centers that do not care for the real economy. 
				 
- 
				
				They pursue only speculation and 
				looting. 
		
		In response on March 4th 
		the economic adviser to Putin, Sergey Glazyev declared openly 
		that if the financial vultures persisted, Russia would create on the 
		spot an independent financial system which is separate from that of the 
		US Dollar.
		
		Glazyev explained to the vampires:
		
			
			'We have wonderful economic and trade 
			relations with our Southern and Eastern partners. We will find a way 
			not just to eliminate our dependence on the US but also profit from 
			these sanctions…
			 
			
			If sanctions are applied against 
			Russia's state structures we will have to move into other currencies 
			and create our own settlement system. We will be forced to recognize 
			the impossibility of repayment of the loans that the US banks gave 
			to Russian state structures. 
			 
			
			Indeed, sanctions are a double-edged 
			weapon, and if the US chooses to freeze our assets, then our 
			equities and liabilities in dollars will also be frozen…'
		
		
		This strategy is known as the Financial 
		Nuclear Option. 
		 
		
		It could lead to the end of the predatory 
		looting system of Wall Street.
		
		The 'Southern and Eastern partners' Glazyev is talking about are clearly 
		the members of
		
		the BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, 
		China, South Africa, the sane part of the world economy, the future.
		
		And it is exactly what the official spokesman of the Kremlin, Dmitry 
		Peskov indicated in an interview to the BBC:
		
			
			"Sanctions against Russia could be the 
			final trigger that will force many countries to create a new 
			independent financial system based on the real economy. 
			 
			
			The world is changing rapidly. How many 
			civilizations grew and died in the course of history? Who will be 
			able to resist the pressure of dying systems and indicate to the 
			people the road toward the future?"
		
		
		The possibility of a new financial system 
		independent from the collapsing dollar empire, as consequence of anti 
		Russia sanctions was also emphasized by an authoritative the Russian 
		media including RT. 
		
			
			…Western sanctions might push Russia to 
			deepen cooperation with BRICS states, in particular, to strengthen 
			its ties with China, which will possibly turn out to be a big 
			catastrophe for the US and the EU some time later.
			
			
			
			
			http://rt.com/op-edge/russia-switches-to-brics-sanctions-357/
		
		
		On March 18, the spokesperson for the 
		Kremlin, Dmitry Peskov, stated that Russia would switch to new partners 
		in case of economic sanctions being imposed by the European Union and 
		the United States. 
		 
		
		He highlighted that the modern world isn't 
		unipolar and Russia has strong ties with other states as well, though 
		Russia wants to remain in good relations with its Western partners, 
		especially with the EU due to the volume of trade and joint projects.
		
		Those "new partners" are not really new since Russia has been closely 
		interconnected with them for almost 13 years. 
		 
		
		This is all about the so-called
		
		BRICS organization, consisting of 
		Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. BRICS represents 42 
		percent of the world's population and about a quarter of the world's 
		economy, which means that this bloc of states is an important global 
		actor.
		
		The BRICS countries are like-minded in regard to supporting the 
		principles of international law, the central role of the UN Security 
		Council and the principles of the non-use of force in international 
		relations; this is why they are so actively performing in the sphere of 
		settling regional conflicts. 
		 
		
		However, the cooperation between Brazil, 
		Russia, India, China and South Africa goes beyond political aspects and 
		is also demonstrated by dynamic trade and multiple projects in different 
		areas.
		
		Today, in total, there are more than 20 formats of cooperation within 
		the BRICS which are being developing. 
		 
		
		For example, in February the member-states 
		came to an agreement about 11 possible projects of scientific and 
		technical cooperation, from aeronautics to bio- and nanotechnology.
		
		In order to modernize the global economic system, at the center of which 
		stand the US and the EU, the leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, China and 
		South Africa have created the BRICS Stock Alliance and are creating 
		their own development bank to finance large infrastructure projects.
		
		 
		
		On the whole, despite fierce criticism of 
		BRICS as an organization with no future, it is developing and increasing 
		cooperation with its members and, in fact, BRICS is showing pretty good 
		results.
		
		With the suspension of Russia's participation in G8 and the 
		strengthening of economic sanctions against Russia, specific industries 
		may be targeted, including limits on imported commodities.
		
		While the West seeks to hit Russia hard, it is important to notice that 
		Russia is ready to switch to other markets, including BRICS, with a view 
		to expanding its trade.