
	by Dan Amoss
	
	June 4, 2012
	from 
	DailyResourceHunter Website
 
	
	 
	
		
			| 
			 
	Dan Amoss, CFA, is a student of the 
	Austrian school of economics, a discipline that he uses to identify 
	imbalances in specific sectors of the market. He tracks aggressive 
	accounting and other red flags that the market typically misses.  
			
	Amoss is a 
	Maryland native, a graduate of Loyola University Maryland, and earned his 
	CFA charter in 2005. In spring 2008, he recommended Lehman Brothers puts, 
	advising readers to hold the position as the stock fell from $45 to $12. 
	 
			
	Amoss is managing editor of the Strategic Short Report. 
			 | 
		
	
	
	
	
	We’re on our way to a new global monetary system. 
	
	 
	
	The current one isn’t 
	working, and each year, fewer parties have the incentive to keep it.
	
	This summer will mark an acceleration of the move toward a new monetary 
	system. If European leaders want to hold the euro together (they do), Europe 
	has no alternative but the printing press. The cries for more printing will 
	drown out the German elders’ warnings against using the printing press to 
	finance government spending.
	
	Reuters recently quoted a Spanish diplomat who likened the German cultural 
	aversion to currency debasement to the Taliban:
	
		
		“It may go down to the wire; 
	it may get very bad,” he said.
		 
		
		“But Germany has to choose. With Greece, it 
	did not have to choose. It could allow Greece to fail. But if Spain fails, 
	Europe fails. So in the end, we have to believe that Merkel and the Taliban 
	of the Bundesbank (German central bank) will change their minds and do what 
	they need to do to save Europe.”
	
	
	Which party is acting like a Taliban fanatic here? 
	
	 
	
	The parties arguing that 
	central banks financing governments can set society on an inescapable road 
	to hyperinflation, or the parties blackmailing the rest of Europe into 
	unconditional bailouts (“if Spain fails, Europe fails”)?
	
	This ultimately comes down to an ugly argument over which countries and 
	institutions will suffer losses and lower standards of living. 
	
	 
	
	Lenders and 
	borrowers should suffer the losses, but thanks to the printing press and 
	bailout policies, losses are spread around to everyone holding currency - 
	even if they were prudent and responsible during the bubble years.
	
	 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	
	Two Choices For The Eurozone…
	
	
	Looking at the big picture, the Eurozone crisis will keep pressure on 
	politicians until it forces an important choice:
	
		
			- 
			
			Unite into a mediocre, fading welfare state. In this potential United States 
	of Europe, Brussels plays the role of 
			
			Washington, D.C., holding the power to 
	tax and issue debt. No country fails or succeeds, and everyone waits as 
	demographics and euro debasement slowly push the welfare state into 
	bankruptcy, or,
			 
			 
			- 
			
			Break up, force losses on banks and bondholders and start over in the 
	aftermath with a series of currencies. In other words, restore a system in 
	which the currency has meaning and living standards rise and fall based on 
	productivity.
 
		
	
	
	Below is how I expect this crisis to proceed, based on political incentives. 
	But first, here is the backdrop to the choice Europe faces…
	
	As expected, nothing concrete came out of the recent summit held by Eurozone 
	political leaders - the latest in a long line of summits dating back to 
	early 2010. 
	
	 
	
	All of them deal with one key issue: 
	
		
			- 
			
			Who will shoulder the 
	losses from the past decade’s government debt bubble? 
 
			- 
			
			And is the European 
	Union destined for a full-blown “fiscal transfer” union, with richer 
	countries spreading the wealth around to the periphery?
 
		
	
	
	Many respected investors see a movement toward fiscal transfer union, with 
	Brussels having the power to tax and issue debt guaranteed by every EU 
	member country. 
	
	 
	
	Bridgewater CEO Ray Dalio, the world’s best macro hedge fund 
	manager, recently told Barron’s that he sees a fiscal transfer union as 
	inevitable. In Dalio’s view, it’s only a matter of how much pain European 
	financial markets and economies must endure before forcing the wealthier EU 
	countries into such an arrangement.
	
	But at this point in the crisis, a transfer union looks like a long shot; 
	it’s not politically acceptable to core countries like Germany.
	
		
		“Why,” the 
	Germans ask, “should we subsidize the budgets of profligate governments that 
	have shown no ability to restrain their spending? These countries can’t even 
	foster conditions that allow for a competitive economy!”
	
	
	That’s a valid question.
	
	 
	
	You can sympathize with the seemingly cruel, 
	miserly sentiment if you ask yourself the following: Imagine co-signing a 
	luxury car loan for a free-spending, un-creditworthy neighbor, just so you 
	can maintain a friendly relationship. You know you’ll be on the hook for the 
	debt, yet the benefits of co-signing are tiny.
	
	Aside from understandable objections to a fiscal transfer union, Germany and 
	other core Eurozone countries also want to prevent the European Central Bank 
	(ECB) from behaving like it’s financing a banana republic. 
	
	 
	
	On the issue of ECB policy, however, Germany is not likely to get what it wants.
	
	 
	
	The ECB 
	will likely launch another round of printing and buying of 
	
	PIIGS bonds, 
	simply because the Greek and Spanish banking crises continue festering and 
	there is little hope of any quick political resolution to these problems in 
	the coming weeks and months.
	
	More ECB printing would not solve the problems clearly on the horizon; 
	printing simply buys more time ahead of a needed restructuring of government 
	debts and banks.
	
	Spain’s hidden and contingent liabilities are becoming all too real. For 
	instance, the regional government of Catalonia, Spain’s wealthiest region, 
	just asked the central government for help refinancing its debt: It must 
	roll over €13 billion in debt through year-end, and has been shut out of 
	international bonds markets for years.
	
	As liabilities pile up at the central government, depositors continue 
	running from Spanish banks. 
	
	 
	
	As we suspected, the recapitalization needs of
	
	Bankia keep growing. The Spanish press recently reported on Bankia’s request 
	of €15 billion in cash from the government - money that the Spanish 
	government doesn’t have, and which would, if granted, push its own bonds 
	further into distress.
	
	Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy’s response to the banking crisis has been 
	erratic and incoherent. The Spanish public is losing confidence in their 
	political leaders. It probably will fall to EU and ECB bureaucrats to decide 
	how to restructure the Spanish banking system, especially since they have 
	access to borrowing and printing options far beyond those of Spain.
	
	I doubt many of the large banks can absorb the losses on Spanish loans and 
	mortgages, because the interconnectedness of the system means the weak banks 
	will drag down the stronger banks, both through the tightening of credit to 
	the rest of the economy and through the liquidation of overmarked 
	collateral, which pushes down collateral values backing loans at all the 
	other banks.
	
	For all the duplicity of his actions in 2008, Hank Paulson knew a successful 
	bailout required all too-big-to-fail banks to take 
	
	TARP money in 2008, even 
	if they didn’t want it; he understood that the most-bankrupt banks would act 
	in a manner that dragged down the supposed “fortress” balance sheets.
	
	Remember, Spain doesn’t have the capacity to implement a TARP-like 
	recapitalization of its banks. 
	
	 
	
	Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy at a 
	recent summit resorted to begging the ECB to buy more Spanish bonds. More 
	ECB buying would do nothing to solve the problem, and would only exacerbate 
	the flight of private-sector bond investors from Spain.
	
	At the end of this process, the losses will likely exceed the value of the 
	Spanish banking system’s equity. Claims of subordinated, unsecured 
	bondholders will likely get haircuts, too.
	
	The ECB and EU need to act fast. Private deposits in Spain’s banks fell 2% 
	in April, to €1.62 trillion, according to ECB data. The month of May must 
	have been even worse. Continued runs at this pace would hollow out the 
	banking system in a matter of months, leaving the ECB as the only entity 
	supporting the towering edifice of bank liabilities.
	
	The central bank reaction to debt crises is prompting large bond fund 
	managers to ponder the future of the monetary system. 
	
	 
	
	Bill Gross, manager of 
	the world’s largest bond fund, in his latest missive describes,
	
		
		“a potential 
	breaking point in our now 40-year-old global monetary system.” 
	
	
	He sees that 
	there is no way out of our current global debt problem other than continued 
	printing and repression of returns for savers.
	
	Spanish bank insolvency lies at the heart of the country’s crisis. Until 
	it’s adequately restructured and recapitalized, Spain’s crisis won’t end. 
	This recapitalization process is why I’ve instructed my readers to short two 
	large Spanish banks - one of which we’re already up well over 10%.
	
	In Greece, it’s more of the same. 
	
	 
	
	The chances of political and economic 
	chaos are high. The Greek government is suffering from plummeting tax 
	receipts, and is likely to run out of cash to fund its budget right around 
	its June 17 elections. It faces the unpleasant choice of sticking with EU 
	bailout terms and receiving the next bailout cash payment or defaulting and 
	jumping into an uncertain economic abyss.
	
	Putting myself in the shoes of Greek political leaders (even if the Syriza 
	party wins the next round of elections), I expect they’ll decide to “accept” 
	bailout terms for now, get the cash and then not adhere to the terms. 
	
	
	 
	
	Depositors and bond investors would see this scenario as more of the same, 
	and the crisis would continue to boil.
	
	Pressure on the ECB to ease will grow. It will cut interest rates. It will 
	expand loan programs and printing operations. The ECB will feel compelled to 
	announce a huge quantitative easing program - one much more similar to those 
	of the Federal Reserve. Such printing could buy time for the European 
	banking system as its political leaders decide how to allocate losses on 
	items like bad Spanish loans and Greek government bonds.
	
	At the end of this process, the euro will be even more debased, and many 
	PIIGS countries and banks will still be insolvent. At that point, perhaps 
	the core EU countries will decide to push toward a fiscal union. 
	
	 
	
	But until 
	then, it will be more of the same.
	
	Meanwhile, the ECB will ease further and likely gain support from the Fed 
	and other central banks in a “coordinated” intervention. So the weakness in 
	gold and gold stocks in early May was merely temporary. And the global 
	middle class will continue to be squeezed by the inflationary policies of 
	central banks that are increasingly becoming pawns of politicians.
	
	More wealthy investors in the core of the Eurozone will come to view the 
	euro as trash and gold as money.
	
	Hold your gold-related investments as we await the next deluge of money 
	printing, likely to arrive soon…