| 
			
 
 
			
			 
			by William Lowther in Washington 
			and Glen Owen for The Mail on Sunday17 October 2015
 
			from
			
			Dailymail Website 
			  
			  
			  
			  
			Smoking gun emails reveal 'deal 
			in blood'  
			George Bush and Tony Blair
			 
			made as they secretly plotted 
			the Iraq War  
			behind closed doors  
			a YEAR before the invasion. 
			  
			  
				
					
						
							
							
							Damning White House 
							memo, from secretary of state Colin Powell to 
							president George Bush, was written on March 28, 
							2002, a week before Bush's famous summit with Blair 
							at his Crawford ranch in Texas
							
							In the bombshell 
							document, headed 'Secret... Memorandum for the 
							president', Powell tells Bush that Blair 'will be 
							with us' on military action 
							
							It adds that Blair was 
							preparing to act as spin doctor for Bush, who was 
							told 'the UK will follow our lead' 
							
							New light was shed on 
							Bush-Blair relations by material disclosed by 
							Hillary Clinton at the order of the U.S. courts
 
 
			A bombshell White House memo has 
			revealed for the first time details of the 'deal in blood' forged by
			
			George Bush and Tony Blair 
			over 
			the Iraq War.
 The damning memo, from secretary of state Colin Powell to 
			president George Bush, was written on March 28, 2002, a week before 
			Bush's famous summit with Blair at his Crawford ranch in Texas.
 
 The Powell document, headed 'Secret... Memorandum for the 
			President', lifts the lid on how Blair and Bush secretly plotted the 
			war behind closed doors at Crawford.
 
 In it, Powell tells Bush that Blair 'will be with us' on military 
			action.
 
			  
			Powell assures the president:  
				
				'The UK will follow our lead'. 
			The classified document also discloses 
			that Blair agreed to act as a glorified spin doctor for the 
			president by presenting 'public affairs lines' to convince a 
			skeptical public that Saddam had Weapons of Mass Destruction 
			- when none existed.
 In return, the president would flatter Blair's ego and give the 
			impression that Britain was not America's poodle but an equal 
			partner in the 'special relationship'.
 
 Scroll down to read the documents in full:
 
 
			  
			
			
			 All sewn up:
 
			President George Bush and UK prime minister Tony Blair  
			at the infamous 2002 
			summit at Bush's ranch house in Crawford, Texas,  
			where the two men 
			spoke about invading Iraq
 
			  
			  
			
			 Bombshell 
			dossier:
 
			U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, left of Bush, 
			 
			wrote to the 
			president to say the UK 'will be with us'
 
			  
			
			
			 
			  
			The sensational leak shows that Blair had given an unqualified 
			pledge to sign up to the conflict a year before the invasion 
			started.
 
 It flies in the face of the UK Prime Minister's public claims at the 
			time that he was seeking a diplomatic solution to the crisis.
 
 He told voters:
 
				
				'We're not proposing military 
				action' - in direct contrast to what the secret email now 
				reveals.  
			  
			
			
			 Big man?
 
			Blair's ego was 
			flattered by the President during his visit to his ranch home. 
			 
			He is pictured above 
			embracing First Lady Laura Bush
 
			The disclosure is certain to lead for calls for Sir John Chilcot 
			to reopen his inquiry into the Iraq War if, as is believed, he has 
			not seen the Powell memo.
 
 A second explosive memo from the same cache also reveals how Bush 
			used 'spies' in the Labour Party to help him to manipulate British 
			public opinion in favor of the war.
 
 The documents, obtained by The Mail on Sunday, are part of a 
			batch of secret emails held on the private server of Democratic 
			presidential candidate 
			
			Hillary Clinton which U.S. 
			courts have forced her to reveal.
 
 Former UK Conservative shadow home secretary David Davis 
			said:
 
				
				'The memos prove in explicit terms 
				what many of us have believed all along: Tony Blair effectively 
				agreed to act as a frontman for American foreign policy in 
				advance of any decision by the House of Commons or the British 
				Cabinet.
 'He was happy to launder George Bush's policy on Iraq and 
				sub-contract British foreign policy to another country without 
				having the remotest ability to have any real influence over it. 
				And in return for what?
 
 'For George Bush pretending Blair was a player on the world 
				stage to impress voters in the UK when the Americans didn't even 
				believe it themselves'.
 
			Davis was backed by a senior diplomat 
			with close knowledge of Blair-Bush relations who said:  
				
				'This memo shows beyond doubt for 
				the first time Blair was committed to the Iraq War before he 
				even set foot in Crawford.
 'And it shows how the Americans planned to make Blair look an 
				equal partner in the special relationship to bolster his 
				position in the UK.'
 
			Blair's spokesman insisted last night 
			that Powell's memo was, 
				
				'consistent with what he was saying 
				publicly at the time'. 
			The former Prime Minister has always 
			hotly denied the claim that the two men signed a deal 'in blood' at 
			Crawford to embark on the war, which started on March 20, 2003. 
 Powell says to Bush:
 
				
				'He will present to you the 
				strategic, tactical and public affairs lines that he believes 
				will strengthen global support for our common cause,' adding 
				that Blair has the presentational skills to, 'make a credible 
				public case on current Iraqi threats to international peace'. 
			Five months after the summit, Downing 
			Street produced the notorious '45 minutes from doom' dossier on 
			
			Saddam Hussein's supposed 
			Weapons of Mass Destruction. After Saddam was toppled, the dossier's 
			claims were exposed as bogus.
 Nowhere in the memo is a diplomatic route suggested as the preferred 
			option.
 
 Instead, Powell says that Blair will also advise on how to,
 
				
				'handle calls' for the 'blessing' of 
				the United Nations Security Council, and to 'demonstrate that we 
				have thought through "the day after" ' - in other words, made 
				adequate provision for a post-Saddam Iraq. 
			Critics of the war say that the lack of 
			post-conflict planning has contributed to the loss of more than
			100,000 lives since the invasion - and a power vacuum 
			which has contributed to the rise of Islamic State terrorism.
 Significantly, Powell warns Bush that Blair has hit 'domestic 
			turbulence' for being 'too pro-U.S. in foreign and security policy, 
			too arrogant and "presidential" ', which Powell points out is 'not a 
			compliment in the British context'.
 
 Powell also reveals that the splits in Blair's Cabinet were deeper 
			than was realized: he says that apart from Foreign Secretary Jack 
			Straw and Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon,
 
				
				'Blair's Cabinet shows signs of 
				division, and the British public are unconvinced that military 
				action is warranted now'. 
			Powell says that although Blair will 
			'stick with us on the big issues', he wants to minimize the 
			'political price' he would have to pay: 
				
				'His voters will look for signs that 
				Britain and America are truly equity partners in the special 
				relationship.' 
			The president certainly did his best to 
			flatter Blair's ego during the Crawford summit, where he was the 
			first world leader to be invited into Bush's sanctuary for two 
			nights.
 Tony and Cherie Blair stayed in the guesthouse close to the main 
			residence with their daughter Kathryn and Cherie's mother, Gale 
			Booth. Bush took the highly unusual step of inviting Blair to sit in 
			on his daily CIA briefing, and drove the prime minister around in a 
			pick-up truck.
 
 Mystery has long surrounded what was discussed at Crawford as 
			advisers were kept out of a key meeting between the two men.
 
 Sir Christopher Meyer, who was present in Crawford as 
			Britain's ambassador to the U.S., told Chilcot that his exclusion 
			meant he was,
 
				
				'not entirely clear to this day... 
				what degree of convergence was, if you like, signed in blood at 
				the Crawford ranch'. 
			But in public comments during his time 
			at Crawford, Blair denied that Britain was on an unstoppable path to 
			war. 
				
				'This is a matter for considering 
				all the options', he said. 'We're not proposing military action 
				at this point in time'. 
			  
			
			 Close: Bush 
			and Blair are pictured above
 
			shaking hands at a 
			meeting near Camp Davis in February 2001 
			
 
			  
			  
			  
			During his appearance before
			
			the Chilcot Inquiry in January 
			2010, Blair denied that he had struck a secret deal with Bush at 
			Crawford to overthrow Saddam.
 
			  
			Blair said the two men had agreed on the 
			need to confront the Iraqi dictator, but insisted they did not get 
			into 'specifics'. 
				
				'The one thing I was not doing was 
				dissembling in that position,' he told Chilcot.
 'The position was not a covert position, it was an open 
				position. This isn't about a lie or a conspiracy or a deceit or 
				a deception. It's a decision. What I was saying... was "We are 
				going to be with you in confronting and dealing with this 
				threat".'
 
			Pressed on what he thought Bush took 
			from their meeting, he said the president had realized Britain would 
			support military action if the diplomatic route had been exhausted.
 In his memoirs, Blair again said it was 'a myth' he had signed a 
			promise 'in blood' to go to war, insisting:
 
				
				'I made no such commitment'. 
			Critics who claimed that Blair acted as 
			the 'poodle' of the US will point to a reference in Mr Powell's memo 
			to the fact Mr Blair, 
				
				'readily committed to deploy 1,700 
				commandos' to Afghanistan 'even though his experts warn that 
				British forces are overstretched'. 
			The decision made the previous October 
			in the wake of 
			the September 11 attacks led to 
			widespread concern that the UK was entering an open-ended commitment 
			to a bloody conflict in Afghanistan - a concern many critics now say 
			was well-founded.
 Mr Powell's memo goes on to say that a recent move by the U.S. to 
			protect its steel industry with tariffs, which had damaged UK 
			exports, was a 'bitter blow' for Blair, but he was prepared to,
 
				
				'insulate our broader relationship 
				from this and other trade disputes'. 
			The memo was included in a batch of 
			30,000 emails which were received by Mrs Clinton on her private 
			server when she was US Secretary of State between 2009 and 2013.
 Another document included in the email batch is a confidential 
			briefing for Powell prepared by the U.S. Embassy in London, shortly 
			before the Crawford summit.
 
 The memo, dated 'April 02', includes a detailed assessment of the 
			effect on Blair's domestic position if he backs US military action.
 
 The document says:
 
				
				'A sizeable number of his [Blair's] 
				MPs remain at present opposed to military action against Iraq... 
				some would favor shifting from a policy of containment of Iraq 
				if they had recent (and publicly usable) proof that Iraq is 
				developing WMD/missiles... most seem to want some sort of UN 
				endorsement for military action.
 'Blair's challenge now is to judge the timing and evolution of 
				America's Iraq policy and to bring his party and the British 
				people on board.
 
 'There have been a few speculative pieces in the more feverish 
				press about Labor [sic] unease re Iraq policy… which have gone 
				on to identify the beginnings of a challenge to Blair's 
				leadership of the party.
 
 'Former Cabinet member Peter Mandelson, still an insider, called 
				it all "froth". Nonetheless, this is the first time since the 
				1997 election that such a story is even being printed'.
 
			The paper draws on information given to 
			it by Labour 'spies', whose identities have been hidden.
 It states:
 
				
				'[name redacted] told us the 
				intention of those feeding the story is not to bring down Blair 
				but to influence him on the Iraq issue'.
 'Some MPs would endorse action if they had proof that Iraq has 
				continued to develop WMD since UN inspectors left.
 
 'More would follow if convinced that Iraq has succeeded in 
				developing significant WMD capability and the missiles to 
				deliver it.
 
 'Many more would follow if they see compelling evidence that 
				Iraq intends and plans to use such weapons. A clear majority 
				would support military action if Saddam is implicated in the 
				9/11 attacks or other egregious acts of terrorism'.
 
 'Blair has proved an excellent judge of political timing, and he 
				will need to be especially careful about when to launch a 
				ramped-up campaign to build support for action against Iraq.
 
 'He will want neither to be too far in front or behind US 
				policy... if he waits too long, then the keystone of any 
				coalition we wish to build may not be firmly in place. No doubt 
				these are the calculations that Blair hopes to firm up when he 
				meets the President'.
 
			A spokesperson for Blair said:  
				
				'This is consistent with what Blair 
				was saying publicly at the time and with Blair's evidence given 
				to the Chilcot Inquiry'. 
			Neither Mrs Clinton nor Mr Powell 
			replied to requests for comment.  
			  
			  
			  
			SENSATIONAL 
			BLAIR EXPOSÉ - YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED
 
 
				
				Why have these memos come out now?
 The U.S. courts have ruled that 30,000 emails received by 
				Hillary Clinton when she was U.S. Secretary of State from 2009 
				to 2013 should be released.
 
 She may have asked for these documents to grasp the background 
				to the Iraq War.
 
 
				What was the Crawford summit?
 
 The meeting between Blair and Bush at the President's Texan 
				ranch in April 2002, 11 months before the outbreak of war. The 
				pair spent long periods discussing Iraq without their advisers, 
				leading to suspicion that they privately cut a deal for the 
				conflict.
 
 UK Ambassador Sir Christopher Meyer said it was impossible to 
				know whether a deal was 'signed in blood'.
 
 
				What did Blair say at Crawford?
 
 At the start of the summit, Mr Blair said:
 
					
					'We're not proposing military 
					action at this point in time.'  
				For the whole of 2002, Blair claimed 
				no decision had been taken and in the run-up to war. He said 
				that Saddam Hussein could avoid conflict by co-operating with UN 
				weapons inspectors. 
				
 What happened after Crawford?
 
 In September 2002, in an attempt to prove Saddam was a threat, 
				No 10 falsely claimed Saddam could deploy biological weapons 
				'within 45 minutes', and Mr Blair went around the world trying 
				to drum up UN backing for action against Iraq.
 
 Despite mass anti-war protests, Britain and America invaded Iraq 
				in March 2003 without the backing of the UN.
 
 
				Had the allies prepared for 'the 
				day after'?
 
 The invasion was declared complete on April 15, 2003. But the 
				reason for war proved spurious, and Saddam's removal left a 
				power vacuum filled by warring factions which some say helped 
				Islamic State rise.
 
 
				Have the memos been seen by the 
				Chilcot Inquiry?
 
 It is not thought the £10million, six-year inquiry has asked to 
				see American Government material.
 
			
  
			  
			  
			  
			Stunning memo 
			proves Blair signed up for Iraq even before Americans
 
			Comment by former shadow home secretary David 
			Davis 
				
				This is one of the most astonishing 
				documents I have ever read.
 It proves in explicit terms what many of us have believed all 
				along:
 
					
					Tony Blair effectively agreed to 
					act as a front man for American foreign policy in advance of 
					any decision by the House of Commons or the British Cabinet. 
				He was happy to launder George 
				Bush's policy on Iraq and sub-contract British foreign policy to 
				another country without having the remotest ability to have any 
				real influence over it.
 And in return for what? For George Bush pretending Blair was a 
				player on the world stage to impress voters in the UK when the 
				Americans didn't even believe it themselves.
 
 Blair was content to cynically use Britain's international 
				reputation for honest dealing in diplomacy, built up over 
				many years, as a shield against worldwide opprobrium for Bush's 
				ill-considered policy.
 
 Judging from this memorandum, Blair signed up for the Iraq War 
				even before the Americans themselves did. It beggars belief.
 
 Blair was telling MPs and voters back home that he was still 
				pursuing a diplomatic solution while Colin Powell was telling 
				President Bush: 'Don't worry, George, Tony is signed up for the 
				war come what may - he'll handle the PR for you, just make him 
				look big in return.'
 
 It should never be forgotten that a minimum of 120,000 people 
				died as a direct result of the Iraq War.
 
 What is truly shocking is the casualness of it all, such as the 
				reference in the memo to 'the day after' - meaning the day after 
				Saddam would be toppled.
 
 The offhand tone gives the game away: it is patently obvious 
				nobody thought about 'the day after' when Bush and Blair met in 
				Crawford.
 
 And they gave it no more thought right through to the moment 
				'the day after' came about a year later when Saddam's statue 
				fell to the ground.
 
 We saw the catastrophic so-called 'de-Baathification' of Iraq, 
				with the country's entire civil and military structure 
				dismantled, leading to years of bloodshed and chaos. It has 
				infected surrounding countries to this day and created the 
				vacuum into which Islamic State has stepped.
 
 This may well be the Iraq 'smoking gun' we have all been looking 
				for.
 
			  
			  
			  
			In full - The 
			Blair/Bush White House documents
 Pictured below is the memo from Secretary of State Colin Powell 
			to George W Bush:
 
 
 
			
			 
			Click above image for 
			full document 
			  
			
 
 Part two
 
			  
			This second, explosive memo, drafted by 
			the U.S. Embassy in London, reveals how Bush used Labour 'spies' to 
			manipulate British public opinion:
 
 
			
			 
			Click above image for 
			full document 
			  
			  
			    |