by Irvin Baxter, Jr.
A young American diplomat was the
leading force in the designing of the United Nations. He was
secretary of the Dumbarten Oaks Conversations from August to
October of 1944 where most of the preliminary planning for the
U.N. was done. He was Roosevelt’s right-hand man in February of
1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe were
was a dying man at the time. His death came
only ten weeks later). At Yalta it was agreed that the Soviet
Union would have three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and
Byelorussia) in the U.N. General Assembly, even though the
United States had only one. At Yalta much of Europe was placed under
the iron heel of communist rule. At Yalta, Churchill,
Roosevelt, and Stalin appointed this young diplomatic
shining star to be the
first Secretary-general of the U.N.
for the founding conference held in San Francisco, April/June of
of this seemed well and good until three years later.
(image below left) was exposed as a
communist spy and sent to prison. Only then did people understand
why the emblem of the United Nations
(image right) looked so much like the
emblem of the Soviet Union (image below
right). It now made sense that the Soviet
Union, at Yalta, was given control over all of
The emblem of
Eastern Europe. Then
everyone understood how the Soviet Union managed to capture three
votes in the U.N. General Assembly compared to one for the
United States. Then it became
why a secret deal had been struck stating that a communist would
always hold the office of of head of the U.N. military.
The U.N. charter was authored by a communist, the first U.N.
Secretary-general was a communist, and the U.N., from the beginning,
was designed to be a Union of World Socialist Republics.
On a recent tour of the U.N., not one mention was made of any
of this by our guide. Hiss’ name was not mentioned one time.
When pictures of the founding conference contained his picture, our
U.N. guide avoided telling us who it was.
I’m sure everyone was taught about the United Nations and its
importance in school, but I’m also sure that the above information
was conveniently omitted from your textbooks!
agreement: U.N. military to always be commanded by a communist
One of the most
important positions within the entire United Nations—if not
the most important—is that of Undersecretary-general for
Political and Security Council Affairs. Most Americans have
never even heard of this position, much
less anything about the man who holds the job. The
undersecretary-general for political and security council
affairs has three main areas of responsibility. They are:
Control of all military and
police functions of the United Nations peacekeeping
Supervision of all disarmament
moves on the part of member nations
Control of all atomic energy
ultimately entrusted to the United nations for peaceful and
In view of the fact that these three
functions may soon constitute the ultimate power of life and
death over every human being on the face of the earth (once
national disarmament is achieved and all military is under the
control of the U.N.), there would appear to be some minor
justification for us to be more than passingly curious over who
wields this power. Since the United Nations was created in
1945 there have been fifteen men appointed to the
position of undersecretary-general of political and security
council affairs. Astonishingly, every single one of them has been a
Communists appointed to the position of undersecretary-general:
Anatoly F. Dobrynin—USSR
Georgi Ptrovich Arkadev—USSR
Eugeny Dmiterievich Kiselev—USSR
Vladimir Pavolovich Suslov—USSR
Alexie E. Nesterenko—USSR
Leonid N. Kutakov—USSR
Arkady N. Shevchenko—USSR
Mikhail D. Sytenko—USSR
Viacheslav A. Ustinov—USSR
Uasiliy S. Safronchuk—USSR
Vladimir Petrovsky—Russia ,
“former USSR (1992-)
James O. C. Jonah—Sierra
Some observers feel that fifteen
Communists out of fifteen appointees constitutes a trend of sorts.
But whatever we call it, Trygve Lie, the first
secretary-general of the United Nations, revealed that this pattern
was no mere coincidence. In his book In the cause of Peace
"Mr. Vyshinsky (of the USSR)
did not delay his approach. He was the first to inform me of an
understanding which the Big Five had reached in London on the
appointment of a Soviet national as assistant secretary-general
for political and security council affairs...
"Mr. Stettinius (U.S Secretary of State) confirmed to me
that he had agreed with the Soviet delegation in the matter...
"The preservation of international peace and security was the
organization’s highest responsibility, and it was to entrusting
the direction of the Secretariat department most concerned with
this to a Soviet national that the Americans had agreed."
The Fearful Master by Edward
Secretary-general has been a socialist
No wonder someone said that the truth is stranger than fiction! This
incredible saga of the United Nations just goes on and on.
Perhaps the most revealing fact of all concerning the powers that
control the United Nations is that every single Secretary-general
since the U.N.’s formation has been a socialist.
Trygve Lie from Norway was
the first elected head of the U.N. He was chosen by the
fifteen-member U.N. Security Council and ratified by the U.N.
General Assembly on February 1, 1946.
Lie, at the age of twenty-three, was appointed secretary
in charge of administration of the Norwegian Labor Party. The
socialist lawyer served as Minister of Justice until June 1939,
when a Cabinet reorganization made him Minister of Commerce. In
April 1945, Lie was chosen to head the Norwegian
delegation to the United Nations Founding Conference at San
Francisco. At the conference itself he was chosen chairman of
Commission III which was charged with drafting the charter of
the Security Council of the United Nations, "the
organ...which would have the power to act against aggressors."
Dag Hammarskjold of Sweden
was elected Secretary-general of the United Nations on April 7,
1953. At the age of thirty, Hammarskjold became Undersecretary
of the Swedish Ministry of Finance. At the Ministry he worked
under the Fabian socialist economist Ernst Wigforss,
whom he once said considered his second father. Sweden has long
been the leading socialist state of Western Europe, taxing its
citizens at a 75% rate.
U Thant of Burma was elected
Secretary-general of the U.N. on November 30, 1962. According to
Current Biography 1962, U Thant considered himself a democratic
Kurt Waldheim of Austria took
office as Secretary-general of the United Nations on January 1,
1972. Waldheim had been Austria’s U.N. ambassador from 1964 to
1968. When the Austrian Socialist party won the March 1970
elections, Waldheim again became Austria’s U.N.
representative. After serving two terms as U.N.
Secretary-general, Waldheim became the head of Austria. It was
revealed that Waldheim had lied about his role while
serving in the Nazi forces of Adolf Hitler. Facts that were
made known resulted in Waldheim being banished from the United
States, even though he was the head of Austria.
Javier Perez de Cuellar
became U.N. Secretary-general on December 15, 1981. In his
address to the General Assembly after being sworn in, Perez de
Cuellar called the disparity in wealth between rich and poor
nations a violation of "the most fundamental human rights."
During his administration, some third-world spokesmen complained
that Perez de Cuellar had not been sufficiently outspoken
in promoting the massive transfer of resources from rich to poor
nations on a global scale (Wealth redistribution has always been
the central plank in the platform of international socialism).
Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the
former foreign minister of Egypt, became the first African to
head the U.N. on January 1, 1992.
"If I was offered the job (of
secretary-general) five years ago," Ghali said, "I
would have turned it down. The U.N. then was a dead horse,
but after the end of the Cold War, the U.N. has a special
was a member of the Arab Socialist Union.
Is it coincidence that one communist
and six socialists have headed the United Nations since
its birth in 1945? Does it seem strange at all that the driving
message of the U.N., the message of wealth redistribution, is the
central message of international communism? Do you find it amazing
that the United States has allowed the Soviet Union to have three
votes to our one in the United Nations since 1945? With the
supposed dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1992, each of the
fifteen member of the ex-Soviet Union now have a vote in the U.N. So
now we are outvoted fifteen to one. Yet Russia retains the right to
invade these states if they get out of line.
So what does all this mean? The plain truth is that the
United Nations has been designed to be a communistic world
government from its very beginning.
What will happen? The United Nations will obtain the world
domination that it has been planning for since its beginning.
Communism will achieve its dream of ruling the world, but only for a
very short time.