The Council on
Foreign Relations and Mein Kampf
In 1941 General William Donovanís covert psywar responsibilities included
covert psychological warfare within the uniformed Office of Strategic
Services (OSS).  In 1943 the OSS released a top secret psychological
report written on Adolph Hitler. The psychologist leading the study was
Walter Langer. Dr. Walter Langerís brother was William L. Langer, Special
Branch Chief of the Office of Strategic Services. William L. Langer was also
one of the editors of the first English version of Adolph Hitlerís Mein
Kampf. The English version of Mein Kampf appeared in 1939. Hitler
Kampf in 1923. Members of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and
the Council on Foreign Relations were reading English Translations of
Kampf many years before they presented it to the American public. One of
William L. Langerís co-editors was George N. Shuster. Langer and Shuster
were Council on Foreign Relations War and Peace Studiesí Peace Aims Group
members from 1941-1945. Another member of this group was Arthur Sweetser,
the Deputy director of the Office of War Information. Sweetser and Langer
also worked together as members of the Political Group with John Foster
Dulles. Another member of the Peace and Aims Group was Allen W. Dulles,
Johnís brother. General Donovan and Allen Dulles made a career of trying to
have the Director of Central Intelligence assigned to the Office of the
The Division of Special Research of the Department of State was organized
like the Council on Foreign Relations Peace and Aims Group. The Peace and
Aims Group gathered information about particular nations or groups of
nations using the Buchanan-Cantril "Adjective Check-list." -- so did the
Division of Special Research. These groups sent this information of
different peopleís aims and aspirations to the Institute of Advanced Study
at Princeton University. This information was given to Cantril and others
studying policy-research, and psychological warfare techniques. Cantril and
his colleagues would script psycho-political PSYOPs from what they learned
and evaluate the effectiveness of the PSYOPs .Federal Broadcast Intelligence
Service would be broadcast the propaganda to peoples of target nations
throughout the world. The psycho-political operations were used to deceive
people in other nations including allies nations. The British played a
willing part in the psycho-political operations, as evidenced by their
liaison with the Federal Broadcast Intelligence Service.
In 1939 Shuster was one of ten editorial sponsors of Mein Kampf. The other
Sidney B. Fay
Carlton J. H.
William L. Langer
Raoul de Roussy de Sales
Shusterís co-editor William L. Langer was a
professor and a psychologist. William L. Langer was the OSS branch chief for
Research and Analysis. While in the OSS William L. Langer worked with
Council on Foreign Relations member William H. Jackson. Their OSS research
included "indirect assessment." "Indirect assessment" was a way of
evaluating a manís personality or state of mind without direct interview by
a psychologist. Professor William Langer was applying this technique to
produce profiles on key political figures. One of the figures Langerís study
focused on was Adolph Hitler. Langer published an OSS psychological profile
of Hitler. "Indirect assessment" was also used to help in assessing the
reliability of foreign agents. Data analyzed included physical appearance,
dress, manner, speech, habits, social and political attitudes.
The introduction to Mein Kampf tells us,
"... Mein Kampf is a propagandistic
essay by a violent partisan. As such it often warps historical truth and
sometimes ignores it completely. We have, therefore, felt it our duty to
accompany the text with factual information which constitutes an extensive
critique of the original. No American would like to assume responsibility
for giving the public a text which, if not tested in the light of diligent
inquiry, might convey the impression that Hitler was writing history rather
than propaganda... "
The editors of Mein Kampf, including
Agents Shuster and Langer, were either misdirecting the reader or woefully
misinformed about the psychological warfare techniques being employed by
State Department Officials, and the Office of Strategic Services, and
Military Intelligence Units. Among the sleight of mind techniques employed
were warping historical truth and often ignoring it completely.
Langer (March 16, 1896-December 26, 1977) was a key figure in the
intelligence community. As a soldier in World War I he rose from private to
sergeant, and participated in the St. Mihiel and Argonne engagements. A
member of the Board of Analysts, Office of Coordinator of Information
(1941-42); chief of Research and Analysis Branch, Office of Strategic
Services (1942-1945), special assistant for intelligence analysis to the
Secretary of State (1946); and assistant director of the CIA (1950-52).
After 1952 Langer served as a consultant to the CIA. Langer spent thirty
years dealing with the problems and organization of foreign intelligence
including nine years on the Presidentís Foreign Intelligence Advisory board
(1961-1979). In his presidential address to the American Historical
Association (1957) Langer emphasized the need for deeper study and more
extensive reference by historians to the teachings of modern psychology. In
his early Langer was a fellow at the Center for Advance Study in Behavioral
Sciences at Stanford. Langerís first significant book was The Diplomacy of
Imperialism (1935). His view was that Hitlerís Mein Kampf
extraordinary medley of amateur politics and amazing insights into
international problems and possibilities, and that Hitler "showed reckless
courage in realizing the German dreams, nightmarish as some of them were."
Shuster (August 27, 1894-January 25, 1977) was a journalist that enlisted
and served in France as a sergeant in Army Intelligence. Shuster was of
German heritage and was not enthusiastic about the war. After the war he was
in the army of occupation in Germany. He studied at the University of Poitiers in France.
Shuster admired the German culture and sympathized with
Germanyís economic problems after Word War I. In his book The Germans
(1932), he glibly dismissed the "ideas" of Adolf Hitler as "no more
commendable for wisdom or practicableness than are the notions of the
average United States Senator." Shuster began to change his views towards
Hitler in 1934 and denounced the Naziís assaults on individual and religious
freedom. During World War II Shuster served on the Enemy Alien Board. When
the war began in 1945 Secretary of War Henry Stimson ordered an "evacuation"
of all Japanese, alien and American alike, from the coastal regions of
California. Stimson remarked that the evacuation made an awful hole in the
constitution but he had to do it on the grounds of safety of the nation and
out of military necessity. The Japanese, alien and American alike, were
"rationalized" into concentration camps. Oddly enough, Stimson didnít
rationalize that the Germans, alien and American alike be "rationalized"
into concentration camps. Did the Japanese "evacuation" recommendation come
from the Enemy Alien Board? Did this recommendation include only a Japanese
"evacuation" because the board was made up of a group of subtle fascists,
and racial supremacists that approved the ethic cleansing being practiced by
Adolph Hitler? A group of subtle fascists that were members of the
on Foreign Relations? A group of subtle fascists who had infiltrated
Hitlerís Nazi party, not to destroy it, but to bring it to power, to justify
a second World War?
Were Army Intelligence Officers George Nauman Shuster and William L. Langer
( both memberís of the Council on Foreign Relations Peace and Aims Group )
editing Mein Kampf as part of Donovanís study? A study that included
researcherís Hadley Cantril and Gerard Lambert. Researchers who believed
there was nothing wrong in giving the American public a message -- which, if
not tested in the light of diligent inquiry, would indeed convey the
impression that the author was writing history and fact rather than
propaganda -- creating for the reader or listener a false "reality world"
which would deceive the listener into going along with a policy they might
not have otherwise sanctioned.
Did the Office of Strategic Services put up funds for getting Mein Kampf,
translated, published and marketed in the United States. Was disseminating
Mein Kampf, part of a psycho-political operation? Mein Kampf was written in
1923. The US and British Intelligence were aware of Hitler and his fascist
organizations for years. Why did these groups wait until 1939 to make
Hitlerís Mein Kampf available to English Speaking peoples? Why werenít
covert-operations carried out to prevent Hitlerís rise to power? Was this
information withheld so Hitler could take power? Was this done to help
Hitler take power to provide the World with an enemy they could hate and
loath; an enemy they would willingly fight a World War against?
Were American Council on Foreign Relations and British
Royal Institute of
International Affairs members aware of Mein Kampf for many years. Were
English translations of this book available American and British
members as early on as 1923 when it was published in Germany? Did American
and British Intelligence agents infiltrate the National Socialist German
Workerís party and help Hitler write Mein Kampf?
The National Socialist German Workerís party was founded on November 9,
1919. Hitler writes in the Conclusion to Mein Kampf,
"On November 9, 1923,
in the fourth year of its existence, the National Socialist German Workerís
Party was dissolved and forbidden throughout the entire territory of the
Reich. Today, in November of 1926, it stands again before us, free through
the whole Reich, stronger and internally more stable than ever before." 
Evidently the German people caught on to the evil nature of
Hitler and tried
to do something about it. Did British and American
hold back the publication of Mein Kampf in other countries so the German
people wouldnít receive support from other nations and Hitler could overcome
the resistance of his countrymen and rise to power? Did British and American
intelligence agents left in Germany after World War I bring Hitler to power
as part of a Council on Foreign Relations plan to cause a second World War?
Hardly one person in 1000 ever heard of the Council on Foreign Relations
The Council on Foreign Relations was formally established in Paris in 1919
along with its British Counterpart the Royal Institute of International
Affairs. The Council on Foreign Relations and Royal Institute of
International Affairs can trace their roots back to a secret organization
founded and funded by Cecil Rhodes, who became fabulously wealthy by
exploiting the people of South Africa. Rhodes is the father of Apartheid.
Many of the American members were American intelligence officers that
belonged to the first American Intelligence Agency -- THE INQUIRY. Many of
the British members were British Intelligence Agents. THE INQUIRY and its
members, who included such notable Americans as Col. Edward Mandel House,
Walter Lippmann, Isaiah Bowman, and James Shotwell, wrote most of Woodrow
Wilsonís 14 points. The INQUIRY members attended the Paris Peace conference
and traded off most of the Fourteen Points to establish the League of
Nations. Wilson was so disturbed by the INQUIRYís betrayal he suffered a
stroke and physical collapse and refused to speak to his influential advisor
INQUIRY member Edward House ever again. The American people refused to join
the League of Nations, because they did not want to belong to an
organization that could force America to go to war and whose intent was to
be an international police force.
method of operation is simple -- they control public opinion.
They keep the identity of their group secret. They learn the likes and
dislikes of influential people. They surround and manipulate them into
acting in the best interest of the CFR/RIIA.
The Council on Foreign Relations, and the Royal Institute of International
Affairs are adept at using the media to create massive psycho-political
operations used to manipulate public opinion. The psycho-political
operations are often designed to create tensions between different groups of
people. The object is to keep the world in a state of perpetual tension and
warfare to maximize profits from CFR/RIIA munition, medicine, media, energy,
and food businesses.
The CFR has only 3000 members yet they control over three-quarters of the
nations wealth. The CFR runs the State Department and the
CIA. The CFR has
placed 100 CFR members in every Presidential Administration since
Wilson. They work together to misinform and disinform the President to act
in the best interest of the CFR not the best interest of the American
People. At least five Presidents (Eisenhower, Ford, Carter,
Clinton) have been members of the CFR. The CFR has packed
court with CFR insiders. Three CFR members (Stephen Breyer,
Ginsberg, and Sandra Day OíConnor) sit on the supreme court. The
CFRís British Counterpart is the Royal Institute of International Affairs. The
members of these groups profit by creating tension and hate. Their targets
include British and American citizens.
The 100 CFR members that surround the president are the "Secret Team." The
"Secret Team" help carry out psycho-political operations scripted by
members in the state department and the Intelligence Organizations. The
psycho-political operations are coordinated by a group of Council on Foreign
Relations members called the Special Group. The Special Group evolved from
the Psychological Strategy Board.
President Truman issued an executive order establishing the Psychological
Strategy Board (PSB). The Board was run by CFR members Gordon Gray and
Kissinger. The PSB has close ties to the State Department and
Organizations. The purpose of the PSB was to co-ordinate psycho-political
operations. Many of those operations were focused at Americans. The people
became wary of the Psychological Strategy Board. Eisenhower issued an
executive order changing its name to the Operations Coordination Board
(OCB). The OCB was a bigger more powerful
PSB. Gray and Kissinger ran the OCB too.
President Kennedy abolished the OCB. It became an ad hoc committee called
the "Special Group," which exists today. The PSB/OCB/Special Group always
has CFR members running and sitting on it. Since the Special Group was not
formed by Executive Order it cannot be abolished.
On September 12, 1939, the Council on Foreign Relations began to take
control of the Department of State. On that day Hamilton Fish Armstrong,
Editor of Foreign Affairs, and Walter H. Mallory, Executive Director of the
Council on Foreign Relations, paid a visit to the State Department. The
Council proposed forming groups of experts to proceed with research in the
general areas of Security, Armament, Economic, Political, and Territorial
problems. The State Department accepted the proposal. The project
(1939-1945) was called Council on Foreign Relations War and Peace Studies.
Hamilton Fish Armstrong was Executive director.
In February 1941 the CFR officially became part of the State Department. The
Department of State established the Division of Special Research. It was
organized just like the Council on Foreign Relations War and Peace Studies
project. It was divided into Economic, Political, Territorial, and Security
Sections. The Research Secretaries serving with the Council groups were
hired by the State Department to work in the new division. These men also
were permitted to continue serving as Research Secretaries to their
respective Council groups. Leo Pasvolsky was appointed Director of Research.
In 1942 the relationship between the Department of State and the
Foreign Relations strengthened again. The Department organized an Advisory
Committee on Postwar Foreign Policies. The Chairman was Secretary Cordell
Hull, the vice chairman, Under Secretary Sumner Wells, Dr. Leo Pasvolsky (
director of the Division of Special Research) was appointed Executive
Officer. Several experts were brought in from outside the Department. The
outside experts were Council on Foreign Relations War and Peace Studies
Hamilton Fish Armstrong
Benjamin V. Cohen
James T. Shotwell
In total there were 362 meetings of the War and Peace Studies groups. The
meetings were held at Council on Foreign Relations headquarters -- the
Harold Pratt house, Fifty-Eight East Sixty-Eighth Street, New York City. The
Councilís wartime work was confidential.17
In 1944 members of the Council on Foreign Relations The War and Peace
Studies Political Group were invited to be active members at the Dumbarton
Oaks conference on world economic arrangements. In 1945 these men and
members of Britainís Royal Institute of International Affairs were active at
the San Francisco conference which ensured the establishment of the United
In 1947 Council on Foreign Relations members George Kennan,
Paul Nitze, Dean Achenson, and Walter Krock took part in a psycho-political
operation forcing the Marshall Plan on the American public. The
included a "anonymous" letter credited to a Mr. X, which appeared in the
Council on Foreign Relations magazine FOREIGN AFFAIRS. The letter opened the
door for the CFR controlled Truman administration to take a hard line
against the threat of Soviet expansion. George Kennan was the author of the
letter. The Marshall Plan should have been called the Council on Foreign
Relations Plan. The so-called Marshall Plan and the ensuing
Treaty Organization defined the role of the United States in world politics
for the rest of the century.
In 1950 another PSYOP resulted in NSC-68, a key cold war document. The
(National Security Council) didnít write it -- the Department of State
Policy Planning Staff did. The cast of characters included CFR members
George Kennan, Paul Nitze, and Dean Achenson. NSC-68 was given to
April 7, 1950. NSC-68 was a practical extension of the Truman doctrine. It
had the US assume the role of world policeman and use 20 per cent of its
gross national product ($50 billion in 1953) for arms. NSC-68 provided the
justification -- the WORLD WIDE COMMUNIST THREAT!
NSC-68 realized a major Council on Foreign Relations aim -- building the
largest military establishment in Peace Time History. Within a year of
drafting NSC-68, the security-related budget leaped to $22 billion, armed
forces manpower was up to a million -- CFR medicine, munition, food, and
media businesses were humming again. The following year the NSC-68 budget
rose to $44 billion. In fiscal 1953 it jumped to $50 billion. Today (1997)
we are still running $300 billion dollar defense budgets despite Russia
giving up because it went bankrupt.
America would never turn back from the road of huge military spending.
Spending that included the purchase of radioactive fallout on American
citizens in the 50ís, and buying thermonuclear waste from the Russians as we
approach the year 2000. Spending resulting in a national debt of $5.5
Trillion Dollars that continues to grow, and interest payments of over $270
billion a year. Is the Council on Foreign Relations trying to make the
United States economically vulnerable to influence from outside sources?
Isnít that treason?
THE INQUIRY, the PSB/OCB/Special group, the
War and Peace Studies, the "X"
Affair, and NSC-68 have had tremendous historical impact. Yet these events
and the role played by the Council on Foreign Relations in sponsoring and
carrying out the events are missing from our History books. You represent
the people. Can you explain to me why the Council on Foreign Relations role
in History has been left out of the History books? Why donít we learn about
them in High School History courses? Why donít History majors in college
learn about the Council on Foreign Relations?
If you want to learn about the CFR try the following:
TRAGEDY AND HOPE: HISTORY OF THE WORLD IN OUR TIME by Carroll Quigley.
Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time. NY: MacMillan, 1966.
THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT by Carroll Quigley. NY: Books in Focus,
THE HUMAN DIMENSION: EXPERIENCES IN POLICY RESEARCH by Hadley Cantril,
Rutgers Univ Press, 1967.
THE WAR AND PEACE STUDIES OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS 1939-1945, The
Harold Pratt House 58th E. 68th Street, NY, 1946
THE ART AND SCIENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS: Case Studies of Military
Application Vol. 1 and 2, Pamphlet No. 725-7-2, DA Pam 525-7-2, Headquarters
Dept of the Army Washington, DC, April 1976. Pollock, Daniel C Project
Director & Editors De Mclaurin, Ronald, Rosenthal, Skillings(Carl F., Sarah
These books are written or edited or contributed to by
Council on Foreign
Relations members and insiders. The Council on Foreign Relations is leaving
proof so some Historian can piece together the truth sometime in the future.
By the time this happens there may be no more America.
WHOíS RUNNING AMERICA? INSTITUTIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE UNITED STATES,
R. Dye, Prentice-Hall 1976, is a well documented study of Council on Foreign
Relations links to the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of
government; the media; the largest law firms; the largest private
foundations; the prestigious universities; and the military. The study and
book grew out of a graduate seminar at Florida State University on "Research
on Power and Elites" in 1972. Biographical data for over 5000 institutional
elites was collected and coded by students. Major contributions were made by
John W. Pickering, Political Science Professor, Memphis State University,
Eugene R. DEClercq, Assistant Professor Political Science, George Washington
University; and G. Edward Weston, Assistant Professor of Journalism at the
University of Florida. If the study were repeated today, many of the names
of the elite in leading positions would change. What would not change would
be the fact that the elites in the study and the elites in power today are
Council on Foreign Relations members.
The way the CFR works is clearly explained by Lippmann. Lippmann was a
member of Americaís first intelligence organization the INQUIRY, attended
the Paris Peace Conference after World War I, and was a founding father of
the Council on Foreign Relations.
Central to Lippmannís strategy of achieving government and international
relations policy aims were large scale psycho-political operations aimed at
the masses. The early work of Lippmann, and another leading pioneer in the
field of psychological warfare, Harold Lasswell, were funded by
Rockefeller Foundation. Not coincidentally the governments national security
campaigns usually overlapped the commercial ambitions of Council on Foreign
Relations and Institute of International Affairs controlled industries. The
Carnegie Corporation and Ford Foundation were principal secondary sources of
large-scale communication research funding, operating in close coordination
with government propaganda and intelligence programs.
Lippmann was the INQUIRYís secretary. Lippmann became the INQUIRYís chief
propaganda and intelligence specialist, and then its director. Lippmann
shaped psychological strategy during the war. After the war Lippmann played
a major role in the integration of psycho-political operations and
psychological strategy into the social sciences in the field of
communications research. Lippmannís major works are "PUBLIC OPINION" (1922),
and "THE PHANTOM PUBLIC (1925)." Both works investigate the impact of mass
communication on society. Both works are based on Lippmannís INQUIRY
Chapter I, of Lippmannís book, PUBLIC OPINION is titled "The World Outside
and the Pictures in Our Heads." Lippmann, writes,
"This then, will be the clue to our inquiry. We shall assume that what each
man does is based not on direct and certain knowledge, but on pictures made
by himself or given to him. If his atlas tells him that the world is flat he
will not sail near what he believes to be the edge of our planet for fear of
falling off. If his maps include a fountain of eternal youth, a Ponce de
Leon will go in quest of it. If someone digs up yellow dirt that looks like
gold, he will for a time act exactly as if he had found gold. The way in
which the world is imagined determines at any particular moment what men
will do. It does not determine what they will achieve. It determines their
effort, their feelings, their hopes, not their accomplishments and results.
The very men who most loudly proclaim their "materialism" and their contempt
for "ideologues," the Marxian communists, place their entire hope on what?
On the formulation by propaganda of a class-conscious group. But what is
propaganda, if not the effort to alter the picture to which men respond, to
substitute one social pattern for another? What is class consciousness but a
way of realizing the world? National consciousness but another way? And
Professor Giddingsí consciousness of kind [ i.e. stereotypes ], but a
process of believing that we recognize among the multitude certain ones
marked as our kind?"14
Lippmannís conclusion is,
"I argue that representative government, either in what is ordinarily called
politics, or in industry, cannot be worked successfully, no matter what the
basis of election, unless there is an independent, expert organization for
making the unseen facts intelligible to those who have to make the
decisions... My conclusion is that public opinions must be organized for the
press if they are to be sound, not by the press as is the case today. This
organization I conceive to be in the first instance the task of a political
science that has won its proper place as formulator, in advance of real
decision, instead of apologist, critic, or reporter after the decision has
Lippmann is advocating the creation of a totalitarian state. If one small
group is permitted to control public opinion, that small group can use their
power to benefit the aims of the group rather than the public at large.
Peopleís actions are strongly influenced by their knowledge base. People act
on their beliefs. By corrupting a persons knowledge base you can manipulate
Lippmann presents a graphic view of what a society controlled by an
"independent, expert organization" would become. It is presented as a
preface to his book, contained in a quote from the Republic of Plato, Book
"Behold! human beings living in a sort of underground den, which has a mouth
open towards the light and reaching all across the den; they have been here
from their childhood, and have their legs and necks chained so that they
cannot move, and can only see before them; for the chains are arranged in
such a manner as to prevent them from turning round their heads. At a
distance above and behind them the light of a fire is blazing, and between
the fire and the prisoners there is a raised way; and you will see, if you
look, a low wall built along the way, like the screen which marionette
players have before them, over which they show the puppets.
I see, he said.
And do you see, I said, men passing along the wall carrying vessels, which
appear over the wall; also figures of men and animals, made of wood and
stone and various materials; and some of the prisoners, as you would expect,
are talking, and some of them are silent.
This is a strange image, he said, and they are strange prisoners.
Like ourselves, I replied; and they see only their own shadows, or the
shadows of one another, which the fire throws on the opposite wall of the
True, he said: how could they see anything but the shadows if the were never
allowed to move their heads?
And of the objects which are being carried in like manner they would see
only the shadows?
Yes, he said.
And if they were able to talk with one another, would they not suppose that
they were naming what was actually before them?"
A society controlled by a "independent, expert organization," arranging
chains of bondage from childhood by corrupting the societies knowledge base,
and deciding what shadows to project on the wall, would be a society of
prisoners that couldnít use their heads to act in their own best interest.
They would become a society of slaves living in a realm of fear.
The Council on Foreign Relations is the "independent, expert organization"
Lippmann is advocating.
CFR member Congressman Richard Gephardt (D-MO), recently informed the TV
audience America will soon have to relinquish control to a "International
Regime." Are we approaching the day when students and workers marching in
the United States will be crushed by UN Peacekeeping Forces under the
control of this International Regime? Who will control the Regime? The
Council on Foreign Relations? Should a major political party consider
someone willing to turn our country over to a "International Regime" a
possible presidential candidate?
Pollock, Daniel C Project Director & Editors De Mclaurin,Ronald,
Rosenthal, Carl F., Skillings, Sarah A., The Art and Science of
Psychological Operations: Case Studies of Military Application Volume One,
Pamphlet No. 725-7-2, DA Pam 525-7-2, Headquarters Department of the Army
Washington, DC, 1 April 1976 pgs 5-6
Langer, Walter C. The Mind of Adolf Hitler, The Secret Wartime Report,
Basic Books Inc., New York, London (1972) Forward ( by William L. Langer)
v-vi; The War and Peace Studies of The Council On Foreign Relations
1939-1945, The Harold Pratt House 58th E. 68th Street, NY, 1946, pg 24
Shuster & Langer were members of Council on Foreign Relations PEACE AIMS
GROUP -- the other members of this group included: Hamilton Fish Armstrong,
Philip E. Mosely, Mose L. Harvey, Dwight E. Lee, Jay Allen, Frank Altschul,
Percy W. Bidwell, Crane Brinton, Allen W. Dulles, Frank D. Graham, John
Gunther, Bruce C. Hopper, Tracy B. Kittredge, William L Langer, James G
McDonald, Philip E. Mosely, Winfield W. Riefler, Lindsay Roger, Whitney H.
Shepardson, William L. Shirer, George N. Shuster, Oscar C. Stine, Arthur
Sweetser, Max W. Thornburg, Jacob Viner, John K. Wright. POLITICAL GROUP
Whitney H. Shepardson, Henry M. Wriston, Carter Goodrich, Walter Langsam,
Walter R. Sharp, Frank Altschul, Hamilton Fish Armstrong, James P. Baxter,
Charles W. Cole, John Foster Dulles, Maj. George Fielding Eliot, Thomas K.
Finletter, Carger Goodrich, William L. Langer, Owen Lattimore, Dwight E.
Lee, Francis P. Miller, Philip E. Mosely, Lindsay Rogers, Nicholas
Roosevelt, David N. Rowe, James T. Shotwell, Arthur Sweetser, Payson W.
Wild, Henry M. Wriston. pg 22; Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Annotated,
Editorial Sponsors John Chamberlain, Sidney B. Fay, John Gunther, Carlton J.
H. Hayes, Graham Hutton, Alvin Johnson, William L. Langer ( OSS - Research
and Analysis Branch Chief ), Walter Millis, and Raoul de Roussy de Sales,
George N. Shuster (CFR - Army Intelligence - CFR War and Peace Studies ),
Reynal & Hitchcock, New York (1940), Introduction pg ix
 Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Annotated, Editorial Sponsors John
Chamberlain, Sidney B. Fay, John Gunther, Carlton J. H. Hayes, Graham
Hutton, Alvin Johnson, William L. Langer ( OSS - Research and Analysis
Branch Chief ), Walter Millis, and Raoul de Roussy de Sales, George N.
Shuster (CFR - Army Intelligence - CFR War and Peace Studies ), Reynal &
Hitchcock, New York (1940), Introduction pg ix; Harry Rositzke, The CIAís
Secret Operations Espionage, Counterespionage and Covert Action, Imperial
Book, Sound & Gift Company (tel:5917633), Lin Kou Book(tel:5511565), Sound &
Gift Company, PO Box 3751 Taipei, 1977, pgs 221-222
Dictionary of American Biography, Supplement Ten, Charles Scribnerís
Sons, New York, 1981, pg. 432;
Dictionary of American Biography, Supplement One, Charles Scribnerís
Sons, New York, 1981, pg. 734-736;
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Annotated, Editorial Sponsors John Chamberlain,
Sidney B. Fay, John Gunther, Carlton J. H. Hayes, Graham Hutton, Alvin
Johnson, William L. Langer ( OSS - Research and Analysis Branch Chief ),
Walter Millis, and Raoul de Roussy de Sales, George N. Shuster (CFR - Army
Intelligence - CFR War and Peace Studies ), Reynal & Hitchcock, New York
(1940), pg 994 Conclusion