September 26, 2013
The Internet has been awash of late with articles, analysis and YouTube clips all examining the warnings put forth by South Dakota S.R. and State Sen. Sheldon R. Songstad (1971-1978 and 1985-1988). 1
Google 'FEMA Region III alert' and page after page of articles, news clips
and releases, etc. pop up for viewing. It has become my habit, (being so
illuminated by the events of Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston, 911, and even the
recent Navy yard shooting) to automatically look for falsities.
As I've mentioned before, here, one must always examine the premise for everything. (Thank you, Ayn Rand). In checking the premise for this news release, critical analysis is required to discern the truth.
When YouTube, Google, a politician and
Donald Trump all blow the same horn, the note is usually off key.
One could ask,
In digging a little further, it turns out the actual news itself originated from one David Eelles on 07.17.2013. 2
Mr. Eelles runs two websites. One is a gloom and doom site called Americas Last Days and the other is an 'end of days' religious site, here. There are several articles and clips regarding Mr. Eelles that can best be summarized by one of them, called "Prophet for Profit?"
To the alert itself, which on the surface is highly alarming and, dare I say, panic inducing (at least for people in Region III).
A quick recitation of the various threads 'put together' by Songstad/Eelles are as follows:
Wow! Scary stuff!
One wonders how a retired state politician and an 'end of days' minister sourced, collated and postulated all this information, much of which is internal military and FEMA directives not readily available to the general public.
One must also question how this search and source operation could have breathed life? What impelled them to look at military and FEMA directives to begin with?
I submit the information was made available to them from TPTB. In keeping with the globalists M.O., in all likelihood, both Eelles and Songstad are unwitting disinfo agents, thoroughly believing they 'stumbled' onto critical information the public needs to be aware of.
media then took the horse and ran with it. Off to the races! Another
national disinformation campaign is up and running! (Rubbing of hands and
evil chuckles follow).
As stated there are endless pages and clips devoted to the fear mongering alert. Donald Trump did an interview with Greta Van Susteren (a well-known globalist media shrill) on 08.13.2013 for "On the Record," a show aired on a network owned by one of the 'Big Five' media conglomerates.
In the interview he stated:
Don't these clowns realize we are onto them? Another indicator is that the main piece was posted on Ron Paul's website, here.
Some of the video clips (of which there are a great many) contain
disembodied voices, as if the speaker was fearful of identification of such
'underground' or 'subversive' news.
The government is mobilizing and many millions of dollars are being spent on the strength of this 'specific' information.
The clip on YouTube that supposedly clarifies this information has been "removed by the user." Please keep in mind; the perps have been at this game for centuries. By removing the clip, it leaves one speculating (they hope) that the information must be correct, else why would it have been removed?
After all, we all know the evil government would not want this 'out there', right?
So sorry, globalists, but you need a new playbook. Perhaps
there is another chapter to Sun Tzu's "The Art of War"? Maybe "Sun Tzu- Part Deux"? Like Robert Johnson's thirtieth song? You need it! We see through the
charades, I am pleased to inform you.
There is a great deal of speculation. Here are some of them:
And of course, there is the possibility of a plague or epidemic of unknown origin, as well as either a weather or environmentally related disaster.
So many scenarios - so little time! I think I'll just tag each one on a small piece of paper and break out my donkey and a dart. But, as seems to be the case these days, bumbling incompetence by the government seems to be norm (here, here and here) rather than the exception.
This time is no different.
Wait a minute! Is this the same airing that took place on August 13th? (Uh…yes). How can this be? This information was already posted on-line on July 28th?! 5
As stated, something is rotten in Denmark.
The sheer amount of data presented for public knowledge does indeed point to something happening in that region (more in a moment on this) between September, October, and November. It is my belief that the actual training and requisitions are genuine. I feel the need to qualify that statement because as much as I disbelieve the government on many things, in this instance I find that for them, the truth serves a purpose.
If a lie would serve better, then I believe they would lie. Morality, (of
lack thereof) is of no more concern to the globalist than a ship is to an
The second is that the alert is for Region III only, and the rest of the country will remain unaffected.
It is only our assumptions that give these pronouncements any weight. Simply because October 1st is stated does not mean it is necessarily so. All that is implied is that these items need to be on site or completed or in the midst of being implemented by October 1st, not that they will be needed by October 1st.
Additionally, we, by virtue of
repeated assimilation (of Region III, Region III, Region III), discount
anything happening to the rest of the country.
As we know, there is an anti-terrorist drill coming up (we all know how well those work out! Boston baked beans, anyone?) called GridEx 2013, on November 13th. A homebrewed (not a criticism…this article is homebrewed), but concise overview is here. (And thank you, Global Divisions).
There has been a great deal of conjecture that this terrorist training exercise will end up like so many before it…a real event. If that happens, and the entire country is plunged into darkness, well, I'm sure the globalist minions spawning this event don't want to get caught up in it, do they?
I can just picture those lunkheads trying to formulate a plan to get their butts covered for food and water, disease immunizations (the real ones, not the mercury laden shots they give our children) and other necessities for an extended power outage.
But hey, they know it won't last forever - this won't be like the show
"Revolution" where the lights go out for good. It will only last long enough
for people to riot, for starvation to set in and the attendant violence and
societal breakdown to manifest.
But ultimately, and what I feel the end game is for this plan, is to (from their standpoint) finally have a justifiable reason to declare martial law.
I don't think it's a coincidence this 'alert' includes Washington DC. If one knows hell is coming down the pipe, would one not take steps to ensure the basics of survival are covered? Of course, as this is a terrorist drill, when the lights don't come back on, it is the terrorists that are responsible.
Greta Van Susteren,
Concisely, I posit this entire FEMA Region III alert is the cover to get supplies shipped in and plenty of muscle on hand to swat the trouble makers without any questions as to why they are doing it.
If you supply the 'why' before the masses ask why, then it goes
off without a hitch. (Thanks, Mr. Songstad… you've played your part… back to
the front porch.)
When October passes calmly, those fence sitters will get back in the pasture
with the rest of the sheep. It's win-win for the globalists, with the end
result being martial law.
If I'm right about nothing happening with the FEMA III alert, and right about GridEx 2013, then millions will die due to an extended power failure and all the hell that comes with such an event.
If I'm wrong and the FEMA III alert is genuine and correct, then there will be a major disaster in the eastern US, though short of it being an outer-space threat we are not privy to, it would have to be a staged psy-op, else how would they know in advance?
The best case scenario of course, is that I am completely wrong on both
hypotheses and I wasted six hours of my life writing this piece; a price I
would willingly pay for a failed analysis.