"Socialist Euro-parliamentarian Giulietto
Chiesa has shown, in February 2008 in EU Parliament, the film "ZERO"
about USA government conspiracy in 9-11 events.
invitation to all 785 EU parliamentarians, and to nearly a thousand
journalists, only 6 parliamentarians, and no one Italian journalist,
came to see the film.
Chiesa attributed the lack of interest of EU
parliamentarians and of EU media to the influence and control of
information by USA ... Until now ZERO has no distributing agency in EU."
Russian TV Prime Time To Air 9-11 Truth Film
Italian film-maker Giulietto Chiesa, who
was in Berlin for a screening of his documentary which questions the
official US version of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, has called for an
international tribunal to probe events.
Chiesa was in Berlin at the weekend for a
screening of his film which features, among others, novelist Gore Vidal
and playwright Dario Fo as well as retired American professor of
philosophy David Ray Griffin who advances conspiracy theories that
contradict mainstream accounts of events of 11 September, 2001.
Federal Aviation Administration controllers, US
Air Force pilots, military commanders and physicists also appear in the
critical documentary, which the director hopes will create “political
awareness” of the “faulty” official investigation into the events by the
“Some of the individuals appearing in the
film are former FBI and CIA agents, people who have in a sense taken a
very big risk in speaking out. I am very grateful to them because they
have done a big job,” said Chiesa.
“The film would not have been possible
without them,” he said, adding that ZERO had been seen in France and
Belgium at individual screenings, and by more than 20,000 people in
But the film so far has not gained a distributor
Pushing for an international tribunal
Chiesa, one of Italy’s most
respected journalists and a La Stampa foreign correspondent for more
than 20 years, told his Berlin audience an 9/11 international tribunal could
serve a useful purpose.
“If feelings were strong enough a positive
result could be obtained, but it would not happen immediately. So far
it’s been the US administration that has won the information fight and
obtained their result - unfortunately,” Chiesa said.
“Our task is to inform millions of people of
the true situation. Everybody should be involved in this struggle with a
tribunal or commission helping once we win approval for the idea,” he
In an interview with
German news agency
DPA, Chiesa, a European parliamentary deputy, said Russian television is to
give prime time airing to his film on the eve of this week’s seventh
anniversary of the attacks in New York and Washington.
“That means that some 30 million Russian
citizens will learn the truth about what happened, which is a very big
result for me.”
Chiesa, whose documentary was first
screened to a large German audience at the Goethe Institute in Munich
in May, was clearly delighted at his reception in Berlin.
“It’s important that so many people have
shown up,” he said.
One of a panel of six experts debating the 9/11
topic in Berlin, Chiesa said he was eager for his film to gain more public
support and become a “multiplicator” across Germany.
“If that happens it means we are making
politics in the right sense of the word.”
Critics question government version of attacks.
Andreas von Buelow, a controversial former German minister of
technology, and ex-state secretary in the Defense Ministry, was among the
Berlin participants who said further investigation was needed into 9/11.
He told DPA it was,
“one of life’s characteristics that
governments are prone to lie in order to achieve their agendas. The
Americans told us that in Iraq, Saddam Hussein had something to do with
al-Qaeda, which was absolutely untrue. Even the CIA knew this,”
“Then, they told us that Saddam Hussein was
preparing weapons of mass destruction, which was also untrue, so
they have been lying all over the place and are still fighting
there. Meanwhile a million people have been killed.”
Asked if there was any prospect of a policy
change once the next US president was elected, he replied bluntly “No!”
Ivashov, Chiesa, Meyssan, Russian Experts To Debate
9-11 On Russian TV
Thierry Meyssan reports from Moscow that
he and other leading international 9/11 truth experts have completed taping
a television debate which will be telecast on the first national program of
Russian state television this coming Friday, September 12.
This no-holds barred, free-wheeling debate,
featuring strongly divergent opinions about what really happened on and
about September 11, 2001, will be shown in conjunction with the documentary
film "Zero," produced and directed by Chiesa and Franco Fracassi
of Telemaco Productions in Rome.
Zero - An Investigation into 9/11 (Trailer)
Russians are thus about to receive
an unprecedented evening of 9/11 truth.
The telecast will go out in the middle of prime
time. Among the participants, General Leonid Ivashov was the commander of
the Russian armed forces on September 11, 2001, and has been a leading
critic of the US official version. A leading strategic thinker for his
country, Ivashov is currently a fellow of the
Strategic Culture Foundation in Moscow.
Giulietto Chiesa is a member of the
European Parliament in Brussels, representing the region around Asti in
northwest Italy. Chiesa has been the leading spokesman for 9/11 truth issues
in the European Parliament, and has been the prime mover behind the
documentary film Zero, as well as the collection of essays by the same name
which has also attracted much attention in Italy since being published in
the late summer of 2007.
Thierry Meyssan, the founder and leader of the
Voltaire Network in
Paris, was one of the first critics of the US official story about 9/11. He
is the author of several books, including 9/11: The Big Lie, and
He also organized the Axis for Peace conference
in Brussels in November 2005. Among almost a dozen Russian participants in
the debate that will be televised Friday evening in Moscow, one of the most
compelling speakers was a Russian cosmonaut who observed the 9/11 events
from his post on the International Space Station in earth orbit.
This cosmonaut recounts in the telecast that, as
he watched the immense plume of smoke spread from New York out over the
Atlantic, he took a large number of photos and films which were sent
automatically to both Houston and Moscow.
“We have been studying these images very,
very, carefully,” commented the cosmonaut pointedly, “and we have seen
some highly interesting things.”
The host for the debate stressed that this
landmark telecast did not imply that the Kremlin administration of President
Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin was officially espousing any particular
point of view concerning 9/11, but rather reflected a commitment to free and
Nevertheless, observers in the Russian capital
sense a far-reaching change of mood by the Russian government in the wake of
the August 7-8
genocidal attack on South Ossetia by the Georgian dictator
and US satellite Saakashvili.
The Russians, according to this view, are
through with doing favors for the US, especially in regard to Washington’s
official myths about 9/11 and
the war on terror, and this telecast will
deliver that message in a clear and unmistakable way.
And now for the new all-explaining document on 9/11
From Ken Freeland:
In the tireless research and reviews which we as truthers are engaged
in, we come across many helpful guides to our understanding of the
mystery of 9/11.
But it is only on the rarest of occasions
that we encounter a piece of research that is so clear, so cogent in its
breathtaking sweep and its ability to connect the dots, that it
revolutionizes our understanding of these events and moves us a quantum
step ahead in our ability to present a solid argument to the public.
piece referenced below is such a gem.
After reading it, I would find it impossible to hold a serious
conversation with anyone about the subject of 9/11 who had not absorbed
it. I should state at the outset that the piece doesn't do much to
settle questions of the technical details of 911. In fact, the author
assumes that all three of the buildings were hit by planes.
But this is really irrelevant, as the piece
is not about technical questions, and can stand or fall without respect
to exactly how the attacks were carried out. This piece is totally about
the motivation for 9/11. Remember, for every crime, you must establish a
motive and a means.
Here the motive is explicated like nowhere
else, and when we consider the specific buildings which were "attacked"
(including Building 6), this "theory" best satisfies Ockham's Razor… it
is the most cogent explanation of why these particular buildings,
including the specific Pentagon offices of Naval Intelligence, were the
targets of the attack.
I entreat all of you to
download this pdf
document and read it immediately. I won't promise you that is an easy
The last part about the banking issues is
particularly abstruse for laymen. But I will promise you that you will
find nowhere else such a complete explanation of the events of 9/11. I
should also mention that I was helpfully prepared for this explanation
by already having read
Gold Warriors, which is the best possible
background for some of the details here alluded to (the Golden Lily
fortune of Japanese War loot expropriated by the CIA for its clandestine
If you have any difficulty understanding
this part of the exposition, you will find that book is worth its weight
Understandably, its authors are still in hiding. I was also
prepared for this explanation by early exposure to the theories of
Eastman et al. as to the reasons for the 911 attacks, which are
vindicated here, though with considerably more elaboration and
Collateral Damage - U.S.
Covert Operations and the Terrorist Attacks on September 11
Initially, it is difficult to see a pattern
to the destruction of September 11th other than the total destruction of
the World Trade Center, a segment of the Pentagon, four commercial
aircraft and the loss of 2,993 lives.
However, if the perceived objective of the
attack is re-defined from its commonly suggested ‘symbolic’ designation
as either ‘a terrorist attack’ or a ‘new Pearl Harbor,’ and one begins
by looking at it as purely a crime with specific objectives (as opposed
to a political action), there is a compelling logic to the pattern of
The September 11th attacks were meant as a
cover-up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of
Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were
destroyed on September 11th.1 After six years of research, this report
presents corroborating evidence which supports their claims, and
proposes a new rationale for the September 11th attacks.
The hypothesis of this report is: the
attacks of September 11th were intended to cover-up the clearing of $240
billion dollars in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund
a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which ‘unknown’
western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry, with a focus on
oil and gas.
The attacks of September 11th also served to
derail multiple Federal investigations away from crimes associated with
the 1991 covert operation. In doing so, the attacks were justified under
the cardinal rule of intelligence:
“protect your resources” and consistent
with a modus operandi of sacrificing lives for a greater cause.