| 
	
	
 
	
	
  
	by 
	
	Matt, 
	
	Paul, 
	
	KJFFebruary/14/2008
 from 
	CooperativeResearch Website
 
	  
	This is a news item pertaining to the Complete 
	911 Timeline investigative project, one of several grassroots investigations 
	being hosted on the History Commons website.  
	  
	The data published as part of this investigation 
	has been collected, organized, and published by members of the public who 
	are registered users of this website.
 
 
 
	Latest Findings Raise New 
	Questions about Hijackers and Suggest Incomplete Investigation
	
 A contributor to the History Commons has obtained a 298-page document 
	entitled Hijackers Timeline (Redacted) from the FBI, subsequent to a 
	Freedom 
	of Information Act request. The document was a major source of information 
	for the 9/11 Commission’s final report. Though the commission cited the 
	timeline 52 times in its report, it failed to include some of the document’s 
	most important material.
 
 The printed document is dated November 14, 2003, but appears to have been 
	compiled in mid-October 2001 (the most recent date mentioned in it is 
	October 22, 2001), when the FBI was just starting to understand the 
	backgrounds of the hijackers, and it contains almost no information from the 
	CIA, NSA, or other agencies.
 
	  
	
	This raises questions as to why the 9/11 
	Commission relied so heavily on such an early draft for their information 
	about the hijackers. 
	  
	
	 
 Specific new information:
 
		
			
			
			New evidence suggests that some of the 
		hijackers were assisted by employees of the Saudi government. It has 
		previously been reported that Omar al-Bayoumi, a Saudi who was paid by 
		the Saudi government despite not doing any work, assisted hijackers 
		Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi when they first moved to the US.
			   
			The 
		FBI timeline shows that when these two hijackers moved into their first 
		San Diego apartment, they indicated that they had been living with Bayoumi in the apartment next door for the previous two weeks. In fact, 
		they had been with him in that apartment since January 15, 2000, the 
		very day they first flew into the US, arriving in Los Angeles. 
			   
			The 
		timeline also reveals that hijacker Hani Hanjour was seen in Bayoumi’s 
		apartment. 
			 
			Omar al-Bayoumi.
			 
			[Source: Saudi Government 
		via Al Arabiya]     
			
			The new book 
			
			The Commission by New York 
		Times reporter Philip Shenon published last week further reveals that 
		Bayoumi had close ties to Fahad al-Thumairy, a radical imam working in 
		the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles. For instance, Bayoumi frequently 
		called al-Thumairy while living next door to the two hijackers, and also
			
			frequently called the Saudi embassy in Washington, 
		D.C.    
			The book also reveals that the 9/11 Commission was aware 
		of “explosive” revelations about the ties between Bayoumi, Thumairy, and 
		the two hijackers, but the commission’s final report omitted “virtually 
		all of the most serious allegations against the Saudis,” due to 
		diplomatic considerations. Now, thanks to this FBI timeline, we are 
		discovering more of this suppressed evidence relating to Saudi Arabia. 
			
			
			Security camera footage obtained by the FBI 
		after 9/11 indicated that Khalid Almihdhar and possibly Salem Alhazmi 
		cased Dulles Airport in Washington, D.C., the evening before 9/11. This 
		fits the account of a
			
			security guard , related in Unsafe at 
		Any Altitude by Joe and Susan Trento, who independently claimed to have 
		seen two hijackers, Salem’s brother Nawaf and Marwan Alshehhi, casing 
		Dulles Airport the night before 9/11.    
			This guard claims the two 
		hijackers were part of a group of five men, three of whom were dressed 
		in United Airlines ramp worker uniforms, that behaved suspiciously. 
		Despite a lawsuit by 9/11 victims’ relatives against United Airlines and 
		others for negligence, the US government has never revealed the 
		existence of this video footage which might support claims that the 
		hijackers had inside help. 
			
			
			Hijackers Marwan Alshehhi and Hamza Alghamdi 
		purchased hundreds of dollars of “pornographic video and sex toys” in 
		Florida. They spent $252 on video and toys in early July 2001, and then 
		another $183 later that month. Furthermore, Satam Al Suqami likely paid 
		for a sex escort in Boston on September 7, 2001. Alshehhi was also 
		recognized by six dancers at Cheetah’s, a nightclub in Pompano Beach, 
		Florida.    
			This fits in with
			
			other evidence of the hijackers
			
			drinking
			
			alcohol, paying for lap dancers, 
		watching pornographic videos, etc…—hardly the expected behavior of 
		religious radicals. 
			
			
			On March 20, 2000, either Khalid Almihdhar 
		or Nawaf Alhazmi used a phone registered to Alhazmi to make a call from 
		San Diego to an
			
			al-Qaeda communications hub in Sana’a, Yemen, 
		run by
			
			Almihdhar’s father-in-law. The call 
		lasted 16 minutes. According to the 9/11 Congressional Inquiry, the call 
		was intercepted by the NSA, which had been intercepting Alhazmi and 
		Almihdhar’s
			
			calls for over a year, but
			
			the FBI was not informed of the 
		hijackers’ presence in the US.    
			The call is only briefly mentioned as a 
		family phone call by the 9/11 Commission in a endnote, and it is not 
		mentioned that the call was monitored. 
		
		  
		The passport of hijacker 
		Satam Al Suqami 
		from websites
		
		here and
		
		here 
			Satam Al Suqami ‘s 
		remarkably undamaged passport, marked and wrapped in plastic. 
			 
			[Source: FBI] 
			    
			
			When hijacker Satam
			Al Suqami’s passport was recovered on 9/11 on the street near the 
		World Trade Center, it was “soaked in jet fuel.” 
			
			
			Hijacker Hamza Alghamdi booked several 
		flights after 9/11. He booked a continuation from Los Angeles to San 
		Francisco later on the day of the attacks. Then, on September 20, he 
		planned to fly from Rome to Casablanca, to Riyadh, to Damman, Saudi 
		Arabia. 
			
			
			It has been widely assumed that the 
		hijackers did everything using their real names, or aliases close to 
		their real names. But a still-classified CIA report found that the 
		hijackers used
			
			364 aliases and name variants. The 
			FBI’s timeline discloses what some of them were.    
			For example, Hani 
		Hanjour and Ahmed Alghamdi rented a New Jersey apartment using the names 
		Hany Saleh and Ahmed Saleh.    
			Fayez Ahmed Banihammad used the aliases Abu 
		Dhabi Banihammad and Fayey Rashid Ahmed. Mohamed Atta frequently liked 
		to use variants of the name El Sayed, for instance calling himself Awaid 
		Elsayed and even Hamburg Elsayed. And when Majed Moqed flew into the US 
		on May 2, 2001, the name Mashaanmoged Mayed was on the flight manifest.
			   
			This suggests that some travel and actions of the hijackers could have 
		been missed when they used unlikely aliases. 
			 
			An ATM video still of 
		Hani Hanjour (left) and Majed Moqed (right).  
			[Source: FBI] 
			    
			
			There has been very little video footage 
		released of the hijackers. So far, the only known footage has been two 
		video stills of Hani Hanjour and Majed Moqed using an ATM machine, one 
		still each of Waleed Alshehri and Satam Al Suqami, several stills of 
		Mohamed Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari in Portland
			
			the night before 9/11, and a few more 
		stills and footage of several hijackers in airports on the
			
			morning of
			
			9/11.    
			But the FBI’s timeline reveals 
		there is more video footage that has never even been publicly hinted at: 
			 
				
				
				Mohamed Atta used an ATM in Palm Beach, Florida, on July 19, 2001.
				
				
				Salem Alhazmi and Ahmed Alghamdi used an ATM in Alexandria, Virginia, on 
		August 2. 
				
				Hanjour and Mojed used a Kinko’s for half an hour in College 
		Park, Maryland, on August 10. 
				
				Moqed and Nawaf Alhazmi shopped at an 
		Exxon gas station in Joppa, Maryland, on August 28. 
				
				Waleed and Wail 
		Alshehri wandered around a Target store in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on 
		September 4. 
				
				Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari were in a Florida bank lobby on 
		September 4, and the audio of Atta calling Saudi Arabia was even 
		recorded in the process. 
				
				Fayez Ahmed Banihammad used an ATM on September 
		7 in Deerfield Beach, Florida. 
				
				Salem Alhazmi was at the Falls Church DMV 
		on September 7. 
				
				Low quality surveillance video at the Milner Hotel in 
		Boston showed Alshehhi and possibly Mohand Alshehri on multiple 
		occasions in the days just before 9/11. 
				
				Ziad Jarrah and possibly Saeed 
		Alghamdi were videotaped using a Kinko’s for about an hour near Newark 
		on September 10. 
			
			
			Some credit cards used by the hijackers were 
		still used in the US after 9/11. For instance, a credit card jointly 
		owned by Mohamed Atta and Marwan Alshehhi was used twice on September 
		15. This helps confirm news reports from late 2001 that hijacker 
			credit cards were 
			
			used on the East Coast as late as early October 
		2001.    
			At the time, a government official said that while some 
		of the cards might have been stolen, “We believe there are additional 
		people out there” who helped the hijackers. 
			
			
			The FBI timeline shows other intriguing 
		hints that the hijackers had associates in the US. For instance, on 
		September 8, 2001, hijackers Majed Moqed and Hani Hanjour went to a bank 
		with an unnamed Middle Eastern male. This man presented a Pennsylvania 
		driver’s license for identification, but none of the 9/11 hijackers have 
		been reported to have a driver’s license from that state.    
			There is also 
		a highly redacted section hinting that a woman in Laurel, Maryland, was 
		helping Middle Eastern men and may have had links to hijackers Mohamed Atta and Ziad Jarrah. 
			
			
			Around 10:00 a.m. on the morning of 9/11, a 
		housekeeper at the Park Inn in Boston went to clean the room that 
		hijackers Wail and Waleed Alshehri used the night before. She was 
		confronted by a foreign male who told her that someone was still 
		sleeping in the room and that she should come back around 1:00 p.m.
			   
			The 
		FBI was obviously puzzled by this, as the FBI’s timeline entry for this 
		event ends with five question marks. 
			
			
			It has previously been reported that shortly 
		before 9/11, hijackers Nawaf Alhamzi and Khalid Almihdhar
			
			left a bag at a mosque in Laurel, 
		Maryland, with a note attached to it saying, “Gift for the brothers.” 
		The FBI’s timeline identifies this mosque as the Ayah Islamic Center. 
		But the only contents mentioned in the bag were pilot log books, 
		receipts, and other evidence documenting the brief flight training that 
		Alhazmi and Almihdhar underwent in San Diego in early 2000.    
			It is 
		unclear why they would have kept the receipts, some mentioning their 
		names, for over a year and then left them at a mosque to be found. After 
		9/11, a former high-level
			
			intelligence official told journalist Seymour 
		Hersh that “Whatever trail was left [by the hijackers] 
		was left deliberately—for the FBI to chase.” 
			
			
			On June 11, 2001, hijackers Saeed Alghamdi, 
		Ahmed Alnami, Marwan Alshehhi, and Mohamed Atta checked in to the Deluxe 
		Inn, in Dania, Florida. The manager of the hotel later identified Saeed 
		Alghamdi as having been there at the time with the others. However, 
		travel records indicate Alghamdi did not arrive in the US until June 27.
			   
			Other previously released evidence has suggested that many other 
		hijackers
			
			were in the US before they officially arrived. 
			 
			Luai Sakra imprisoned in 
		Turkey.  
			[Source: Reuters] 
			    
			
			Several months ago, the London Times 
		reported on an al-Qaeda leader imprisoned in Turkey named Luai Sakra. 
		Sakra claims to have
			
			trained six of the hijackers in Turkey, 
		including Satam Al Suqami. The FBI’s timeline supports his account, 
		because Al Suqami’s passport record indicates he spent much of his time 
		between late September 2000 and early April 2001 in Turkey.    
			Furthermore, Sakra claimed that Al Suqami was one of the hijacker leaders, and not 
		just another “muscle” hijacker as US investigators have alleged. The 
		FBI’s timeline supports this, because it shows that Al Suqami was 
		frequently on the move from 1998 onwards, flying to Syria, Jordan, Saudi 
		Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Iran, 
		Malaysia, as well as Turkey, and he travelled to most of these countries 
		more than once.    
			This is particularly important because contributors to 
		the History Commons have put together evidence suggesting that Sakra was 
		a CIA asset before 9/11, which would suggest that Al Suqami and other 
		hijackers were actually
			
			trained by a
			
			CIA asset. 
			
			
			When Ahmed Alghamdi arrived in the US from 
		London on May 5, 2001, an immigration inspector apparently noted that 
		Alghamdi commented to him that the media was distorting the facts about 
		Osama bin Laden and that bin Laden was a good Muslim. Alghamdi also 
		indicated that he was travelling with more than $10,000 worth of 
		currency.    
			Shortly after 9/11, the New York Times, Washington Post, and 
		other newspapers reported that by the spring of 2001,
			
			US customs was investigating Alghamdi and two 
		other future 9/11 hijackers for their connections to known 
		al-Qaeda operatives.    
			One British newspaper even noted that Alghamdi 
		should have been “instantly ‘red-flagged’ by British intelligence” as he 
		passed through London on his way to the US because of a
			
			warning about his links to al-Qaeda. It 
		has not been explained how Alghamdi was able to pass through British and 
		US customs, even as he was openly praising bin Laden.
  
			
			Hijacker Nawaf Alhazmi was mugged outside of 
		his apartment in Alexandria, Virginia, by an “unknown black male” on May 
		1, 2001. He filed a police report about this and gave his correct name 
		and address. In August 2001, Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar were
			
			watchlisted by the CIA, and an FBI 
		investigator began
			
			looking for them in the US. 
			   
			But, as one 
		news report later noted, the investigator “never performed one of the 
		most basic tasks of a police manhunt. He never ran Almihdhar or Alhazmi 
		through the NCIC computer,” a widely used police database that should 
		have listed this mugging, as well as a
			
			speeding ticket Alhazmi had received 
		the month before. 
			
			
			On August 26, 2001, Nawaf Alhazmi’s car was 
		queried by police in Totowa, New Jersey, just a few miles from where he 
		was 
			living in Paterson. Police took down 
		details of his rental car and put all the information in the NCIC 
		database. On August 29, with Alhazmi still living in Paterson, an FBI 
		agent was assigned to look for him. But as mentioned above, he didn’t 
		search the NCIC database.    
			On September 2, this agent did
			
			search a national motor vehicle database, 
		and this, the mugging, and other encounters Alhazmi had with police 
		should have shown up there as well, but for some inexplicable reason the 
		agent still did not discover that Alhazmi was in the US. 
			
			
			Hijacker Abdulaziz Alomari lost his plane 
		ticket just before 9/11. He reported it lost on September 8, and picked 
		a replacement ticket up from the American Airlines terminal at Logan 
		airport in Boston the next day. The US government has generally promoted 
		what one FBI official has called “the 
		Superman scenario” - the idea that the hijackers made no 
		mistakes.    
			For instance, in 2004
			
			one FBI official claimed, 
			 
			 
			A completely redacted 
		page from the FBI’s timeline.  
			[Source: Public domain]
			 
	Unfortunately, much of the FBI timeline is 
	heavily censored, with entire pages sometimes being completely redacted.  
	  
	But 
	from what we do know, this timeline indicates that many questions remain 
	about the hijackers and the 9/11 attacks. We know that the FBI’s timeline 
	was available to the 9/11 Commission, so why did the commission fail to 
	mention any of the information listed above? 
 It’s interesting to compare the results of the 9/11 Commission with the
	9/11 
	Congressional Inquiry that proceeded it. For instance, while the 9/11 
	Commission downplayed any possible ties between the hijackers and the Saudi 
	government, the 9/11 Congressional Inquiry wrote an entire chapter on the 
	topic.
 
	  
	Unfortunately, all 28 pages of that chapter were censored.  
	  
	But Sen. Bob Graham, co-chair of the inquiry, 
	later claimed that evidence relating to the two hijackers who lived in San 
	Diego “presented a compelling case that there was Saudi assistance” to the 
	9/11 plot. He alleged that Omar al-Bayoumi in fact was a Saudi intelligence 
	agent.
	
	He also concluded that President Bush 
	directed the FBI “to restrain and obfuscate” investigations into these ties.
	
 Now, we’re finally beginning to see some of what was in those missing 28 
	pages.
 
	  
	
	
	One anonymous official who has seen the pages claims:
	 
		
		“We’re not talking about rogue elements. 
		We’re talking about a coordinated network that reaches right from the 
		hijackers to multiple places in the Saudi government.”  
	The 9/11 Commission also downplayed the idea 
	that the hijackers had any assistance in the US. The 9/11 Congressional 
	Inquiry, by contrast, noted that many people who interacted with the 
	hijackers in the US, including Omar al-Bayoumi, were
	
	under FBI investigation even before 9/11.
	
 Unfortunately, neither the 9/11 Commission nor the 9/11 Congressional 
	Inquiry was a complete and unbiased investigation. If this timeline reflects 
	just some of what only the FBI knew about the hijackers one month after the 
	attacks, one can only guess at how much more all the US agencies combined 
	know about the hijackers now.
 
	  
	Why is that information being kept secret? 
 
	  
	FBI document:
  
		
			
				
				
				
				
				FBI Hijackers Timeline, cover sheet, 
				pages 1-105 
				
				
				
				FBI Hijackers Timeline, pages 
				106-210 
				
				
				
				FBI Hijackers Timeline, pages 
				211-297      |