Part 1

 

Three Burning Buildings - One Result

How much more evidence do we need before the government and mainstream media finally talks about this issue? By ignoring this issue, the government and media are just insulting our intelligence.

Part 2

 

All At Freefall Speed

 



 

9/11 witnesses - who include fire crew, police officers and media reporters - heard and saw explosions going off inside the towers, long before they actually fell. Many witnesses reported powerful explosions in the basements of the buildings long before they collapsed.

 

Plus, controlled demolition experts agree that the collapses of the three buildings bear all of the hallmarks of a controlled demolition.

 

For example, we see demolition "squibs" shooting out of the windows of the buildings before they started to collapse. All three buildings collapsed at near freefall speed.

 

Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane and contained only small scattered fires, came down symmetrically in just 6-seconds.

 

And 6-weeks after 9/11, liquefied steel was found under the rubble of all three buildings and the temperature was still in excess of 1500F. Jet-fuel simply cannot burn hot enough to reach that sort of temperature. And many of the steel beams found in the rubble of the three buildings were cut diagonally - in exactly the same way as shaped-charges slice through steel diagonally to bring a building straight down. Sulfur residue was also found on the steel beams.

 

Sulfur used with thermite is called thermate -- which produces even faster results than thermite, reaching temperatures of over 4,000F. We also see red-hot molten steel dripping from the windows of the towers prior to their collapse. We really need to wake up to the facts and ask questions. If we don't, what does that say about us?

 

If you haven't yet heard about this subject, please go to Google and find out about the melting point of steel, and about the maximum temperature that jet-fuel can reach, and about the use of thermate shaped-charges in controlled demolitions.

 

Once you know these facts, you'll realize that those three buildings simply could NOT have collapsed in the way they did UNLESS they were brought down in a controlled demolition.

 

   

Part 3

 

Bombs in the Buildings

Bombs, explosions, secondary explosions, explosive devices.... how many more times do we need to hear these words being said by 9/11 witnesses before we start asking questions about what really happened on that awful day?

 

These witnesses include fire crew, police officers and media reporters - who all heard and saw explosions going off inside the towers, long before they actually fell.

 

Many witnesses reported powerful explosions in the basements of the buildings long before they collapsed. Plus, controlled demolition experts agree that the collapses of the three buildings bear all of the hallmarks of a controlled demolition.

 

For example, we see demolition "squibs" shooting out of the windows of the buildings before they started to collapse. All three buildings collapsed at near freefall speed. Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane and contained only small scattered fires, came down symmetrically in just 6-seconds.

 

And 6-weeks after 9/11, liquefied steel was found under the rubble of all three buildings and the temperature was still in excess of 1500F. Jet-fuel simply cannot burn hot enough to reach that sort of temperature. And many of the steel beams found in the rubble of the three buildings were cut diagonally - in exactly the same way as shaped-charges slice through steel diagonally to bring a building straight down.

 

Sulfur residue was also found on the steel beams. Sulfur used with thermite is called thermate -- which produces even faster results than thermite, reaching temperatures of over 4,000F. We also see red-hot molten steel dripping from the windows of the towers prior to their collapse. How much more evidence do we need before the government and mainstream media finally talks about this issue?

 

By ignoring this issue, the government and media are just insulting our intelligence!

 

 

 

 

Part 4

 

1,000 Cameras and No Airplane!

I am not saying that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane on 9/11, however we have every right to be suspicious when we look at the facts. My gut feeling is that the Pentagon WAS hit by a plane, but I find it hard to believe that the plane was the Flight 77 Boeing 757 jet.

 

The Pentagon is the most guarded building on the planet, with countless CCTV cameras covering every part of the building both inside and out.

 

Plus there are many establishments in the immediate area, such as gas stations, hotels, etc, that have CCTV cameras. Yet the US government refuses to release any images or video that actually shows a plane approaching the Pentagon on 9/11, let alone a Boeing 757.

 

Within minutes of the crash, the FBI confiscated CCTV footage from all of the establishments in the immediate area, and they refuse to show us any of that footage. The only images they have released were only released after years of demands under the Freedom of Information Act, and none of those images show an actual airplane.

 

If a Boeing 757 really did hit the Pentagon then why not show us the footage? And what about the lack of any wreckage from a Boeing 757, and the lack of bodies, and the fact that the damage to the Pentagon wall is not consistent with what you'd expect if it had been hit by a Boeing 757 -- the hole is way too small for a start.

 

And if the alleged terrorists had wanted to wreak maximum damage, then why would they fly the plane into the only part of the Pentagon that had recently been re-inforced, and the only part of the Pentagon that housed the accountants who were looking into the disappearance of over a trillion dollars from the US economy?

 

And in any case, the flight instructor of the alleged hijackers said that these people were useless at flying even the smallest aircraft, and yet we're expected to believe that they carried out an extremely difficult 360 degree maneuver and managed to fly the Boeing just a few feet from the ground as it approached the Pentagon.

 

Whichever way you want to look at it, this just doesn't quite add up, it's like trying to put a square peg into a round hole.
 

 

Return to Contents