by Arjun Walia
September 11, 2016
Steven Jones is a former full professor of physics at Brigham
Young University, his major research interests have been in the
areas of fusion, solar energy, and archaeometry.
He has authored or co-authored a number
of papers documenting evidence of extremely high temperatures during
the WTC destruction and evidence of unreacted nano-thermitic
material in the WTC dust.
Robert Korol is a professor emeritus of civil engineering at
McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, as well as a fellow of the
Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and the Engineering Institute
His major research interests have been
in the areas of structural mechanics and steel structures. More
recently, he has undertaken experimental research into the
post-buckling resistance of H-shaped steel columns and into the
energy absorption associated with pulverization of concrete floors.
Anthony Szamboti is a mechanical design engineer with over 25
years of structural design experience in the aerospace and
Since 2006, he has authored or
co-authored a number of technical papers on the WTC high-rise
failures that are published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies
and in the International Journal of Protective Structures.
Ted Walter is the director of strategy and development for
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), a nonprofit
organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and
In 2015, he authored "AE- 911Truth's
Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says About the Destruction of
World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7." He holds a Master of
Public Policy degree from the University of California, Berkeley.
Together, they recently published a paper titled "15
Years Later - On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses"
in the European Scientific Journal.
In it, they conclude that:
It bears repeating that fires have
never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise
before or since 9/11.
Did we witness an unprecedented
event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST
reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion,
fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and
Instead, the evidence points
overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were
destroyed by controlled demolition.
Given the far-reaching implications,
it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of
a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible
Apart from all of the evidence presented
in the paper, they also point out how more than 125 first responders
were documented saying that they saw hear, and/or felt explosions
prior to and/or during the collapses.
It's also emphasized in the study that the collapse mechanics are
only a fraction of the available evidence indicating that the
airplane impacts and fires had nothing to do with the building
Videos show that the upper section
of each tower disintegrated within the first four seconds of
After that point, not a single video
shows the upper sections that purportedly descended all the way
to the ground before being crushed. Videos and photographs also
show numerous high-velocity bursts of debris being ejected from
NIST refers to these as "puffs of
smoke" but fails to properly analyze them. NIST also provides no
explanation for the midair pulverization of most of the towers'
concrete, the near-total dismemberment of their steel frames, or
the ejection of those materials up to 150 meters in all
NIST sidesteps the well-documented
presence of molten metal throughout the debris field and asserts
that the orange molten metal seen pouring out of WTC 2 for the
seven minutes before its collapse was aluminum from the aircraft
combined with organic materials.
Yet experiments have shown that
molten aluminum, even when mixed with organic materials, has a
silvery appearance - thus suggesting that the orange molten
metal was instead emanating from a thermite reaction being used
to weaken the structure.
Meanwhile, unreacted nano-thermitic
material has since been discovered in multiple independent WTC