DIPLOMACY BY DECEPTION
10 - Anatomy
Assassination has long been a favorite method of getting rid of a
political rival or leader whose policies are an anathema to another
power, or where a leader appointed by a secret body does not continue
to obey their orders, as in the case of President John F. Kennedy.
Assassinations are also carried out to bring about political,
economic or religious changes deemed desirable by parties in
opposition to a government, ruling body or religious precept.
History is filled with examples.
Very often conspiracies surround assassinations which are never
uncovered, such as in the murder of Martin Luther King Jr., John F.
Kennedy and Robert Kennedy. In these three cases, the alleged
murderer was silenced, Oswald before he could get his day in court;
Ray by being sidetracked by an unscrupulous lawyer; Sirhan Sirhan
committed to prison. This has given rise to the belief very strongly
held by millions of Americans that neither Ray, Oswald nor Sirhan
Sirhan were the ones who pulled the triggers.
Immediately following the King murder, the Memphis police had a
golden opportunity to lift fingerprints from the rooming house
where Ray was supposed to have stayed. The rooming house was on South
Main Street, in a black neighborhood in Memphis; Ray arrived there
at 3pm on April 4, 1968. Witnesses said they saw three men coming
out or the building, one of whom was Ray. It would be interesting to
know why no effort was ever made to locate the other two men seen
There was no positive identification of Ray's fingerprints at the
rooming house. According to Major Barney Ragsdale, of the Georgia
Bureau of Investigation, the Missouri State Penitentiary where Ray
had been incarcerated sent the FBI a wrong set of fingerprints. For
some reason, as yet unexplained, it took the FBI two weeks to
announce that Ray was the killer.
This confounded the FBI's
long-held claim that it can identify a person by print comparison
within 10 minutes. The fingerprint comparison check was taken from
Los Angeles records, a departure from normal procedure. Atlanta
would have been the logical place to check records. The Los Angeles
fingerprints were those of Eric Starvo Galt. A photograph accompanied
the prints. Did the delay have anything to do with Eric Starvo Galt?
Was "Galt" Ray?
When the Memphis police were shouldered out of the way by the FBI,
AP reporter Don McKee wrote:
"Federal agents have scoured the city
showing sketches of a man's face and asking about the name Eric Starvo Galt, the mysterious object of a hunt linked to the probe of
Dr. Martin Luther King's assassin. What the agents have learned or
what they want with Galt is a tightly kept secret".
Gaylord Shaw, also an AP reporter sent a dispatch which stated:
FBI is withholding nationwide distribution of a composite drawing of
Dr. Martin Luther King's assassin. When the white Mustang, which Ray
was said to have used to make his getaway after the shooting, was
found in Atlanta, it was traced to Eric Starvo Galt.
The FBI issued a
bulletin for the arrest of Galt for 'conspiring with another man he
alleged was his brother to injure, oppress, threaten, intimidate Dr.
The bulletin was at first withdrawn, and then reinstated.
Among other things, it stated that Galt had taken dancing lessons in
New Orleans in 1964 and 1965. James Earl Ray was in the Missouri
State Penitentiary at the time.
Two weeks after King's murder, J.Edgar Hoover announced that Galt
was in fact James Earl Ray. Hoover did not say what became of Galt's
brother. Why was no investigation conducted into the whereabouts of
Galt's "brother ?"
The mysterious removal of Detective Redditt of the Memphis Police
Department from the area of the Lorraine Motel has yet to be
explained. After Redditt was escorted home, Lieutenant Arkin of the
Memphis Police Department received a message from the Secret Service
said that "a mistake had been made" concerning the "contract" Redditt
was actually accompanied on his surveillance detail by W.B.
Richmond, a fellow detective.
Richmond testified that he was not on
surveillance duty at the time that King was shot, but that he was at
the Memphis Police Department headquarters and knew nothing of the
actual murder. Later, Richmond did a complete about-face and
admitted that he was at a fire station directly across the street
from the Lorraine Motel at the exact time King was shot Why the
contradiction? Did Richmond testify to this fact under oath to the
Justice Department and if so, why was he never indicted for perjury?
When Scotland Yard arrested Ray at London's Heathrow Airport, he
told the officers that his name was "Ramon George Sneyd." Once
again, the FBI did something strange; the Los Angeles fingerprints
of Galt were sent to Scotland Yard, rather than the ones in FBI
records in Washington.
The now-famous photograph of King lying dead on the balcony of the
Lorraine Motel shows Jesse Jackson and Andrew Young pointing not at
the window of the rooming house, but to the knoll where witnesses
said they saw a man covered with a towel hiding behind some bushes.
The directional track of the wound in King's body indicates beyond a
reasonable doubt that this was most likely the area from where the
shot was fired, rather than from the bathroom window of the rooming
That Ray's trial was a mockery of justice cannot be doubted. Ray was
not allowed to mention the word "conspiracy" which appeared in his
original pleas a number of times. The judge also refused to let Ray
discuss his conspiracy statement and his lawyer Percy Foreman,
agreed with the judge. On Foreman's advice, Ray pleaded guilty,
which doomed his chances of obtaining a full and fair trial.
In October of 1974, Ray was granted a retrial hearing in Memphis
Federal District Court but after eight days of hearings, his plea
was dismissed. Ray continued to proclaim his innocence and told his
family he was determined to have the truth come out. Perhaps that is
why in 1977, while in the Brushy Mountain State Prison, an attempt
to murder him was made. Although he suffered serious stab wounds,
Ray survived. There are just too many loose ends lying around for a
convincing case to be made that Kay fired the shot that killed King.
The Committee of 300 is constantly striving to control all natural
resources in all countries. Their position has been stated and
restated by H.G. Wells and Lord Bertrand Russell. Nowhere was this
position more strongly enforced than in the Congo and South Africa.
Known as the Belgian Congo, this huge country, the second largest in
Africa, was for decades ruthlessly stripped of its natural
resources: copper, zinc, tin, rubber, ivory and agricultural
products such as cacao, coffee and palm oil. Belgian King Leopold II
often said that everything of value in the Congo belonged to him.
This was certainly true, as the Belgian government ran the country's
railroads, mines, smelters, cacao and palm oil plantations,
factories, hotels through front corporations. The corporations
answered to King Leopold II, in essence, to the Committee of 300. It
was Committee of 300 policy at its best.
Congolese workers received little pay, and what they did get was
largely in the form of free housing, medical benefits and clothing.
All that was threatened by an aspiring political leader by the name
of Patrice Lumumba who, in 1959, announced the formation of a
national political party to oppose Belgian rule of the country. The
Belgian authorities tagged Lumumba a "communist" and a danger to the
welfare of the country. He was arrested and then released. Lumumba
was in fact not concerned with communism, but directed his efforts
at bettering the life for the Congolese people.
In 1960, great unrest occurred as Lumumba called for independence
from Belgium. Lumumba asked for help from the United Nations and the
United States, but was refused. He was dubbed a "man who plays with
Marxist verbiage" by the State Department which, by the way, did not
offer proof of its contention. Lumumba's amazing gift of In August
of 1960, two CIA officers, both with criminal records, were ordered
by Allen Dulles to murder Lumumba within 3 months.
Lumumba's gift of
oratory was noted by CIA reports from the Congo and also described
Lumumba's alleged communist connections. The following month, the CIA
ordered Joseph Schneider, a bacteriological scientist, to the Congo
with a diplomatic bag containing a vial of a lethal virus to be used
to kill Lumumba. Dulles ordered the elimination of Lumumba after
consulting with Eisenhower, but the virus carried by Schneider could
not be administered because Lumumba was constantly on the move.
The Senate Committee overseeing intelligence operations chaired by
Frank Church, reported that the CIA was in touch with elements in
the Congo who wanted Lumumba killed. The implication of the Church
report was that these were Belgian government officials. Fearing for
his life, Lumumba sought protection from the United Nations, but was
turned away. Instead, the United Nations placed him under house
arrest, but he managed to escape in a car provided by his brother,
and with his wife and one of his children, Lumumba fled to
Stanleyville, where he enjoyed strong support.
CIA reports in 1960 tell of how the agency helped to
recapture Lumumba by showing the Congolese military how and where to
setup roadblocks. The puppet leader appointed by the Committee of
300, one Joseph Mobutu, oversaw the search. When Lumumba was
caught by Mobutu's men on Dec. 1, 1960, he was held prisoner until
Jan. 17, 1961.
On Feb. 12, 1961, Mobutu announced that Lumumba had escaped from a
house in a remote area where he was being held and that he had been
killed by hostile tribesmen. But the CIA's John Syckwell said that a
CIA agent drove the body of Lumumba around in the trunk of his car
while deciding what should be done with it. It was never disclosed
as to exactly what was done with it. However,
the United Nations
reported that two Belgian mercenaries, Col. Huyghe, and Capt. Gat,
were the killers. The Justice Department ended its inquiries by
concluding that there was no evidence to support any CIA involvement in Lumumba's murder.
The murder of Pope John Paul I can also be classified as a political
assassination if we take into account that the Vatican is a state
and that its titular head, the pope, can and does wield enormous
power which has changed the course of history. From the documents I
studied, it is certain that four popes have been murdered, all of
them by the administering of poison.
The recorded history of Pope Clement XIII (Carlo Rezzonico) is well
documented, if not proven. At the urging of royalty in Europe,
Clement decided to put an end to Jesuit subversion inside the
Catholic Church hierarchy. After months of delay, Clement's
the Jesuit Order was ready. But he never
got a chance to read it into canon law. After a night of terrible
convulsions and vomiting, Clements died on Feb. 12, 1769. Clement's
proclamation vanished, never to be found again, and the Jesuits grew
stronger than ever.
Pope Clement XIV (Lorenzo Gananelli) took up where Pope Clement XIII
was forced (by death) to leave off. On Aug. 16 1773, Clement issued
the Bull, "Dominus ac Redemptor" which declared the Jesuits as
enemies of the Church. Immediate action followed with the arrest and
imprisonment of the Jesuit general and his hierarchy, seizure of
Jesuit property and the closure of its learning institutions. It was
the greatest blow ever struck against the Jesuits. Immediately
thereafter, sinister whisperings against Clements began to circulate
in the Vatican.
On Oct 2, 1774, Pope Clement XIV became violently ill, and, after
hours of horrible suffering, he passed away. A potent poison,
administered by persons unknown, ended his life. So potent was the
poison that it caused an immediate collapse of his internal organs,
followed by an amazingly swift decomposition of his entire body. His
face was completely unrecognizable and his body could not lie in
state. The message was clear, leave Freemasonry and the Jesuits
alone, or suffer death.
When Albini Luciani reluctantly accepted the papal crown and became
Pope John Paul I, he immediately realized the extent of the
Freemason/Jesuit influence in the highest councils of
An excellent scholar with a remarkably quick mind, he was completely
misread by his enemies; his meek humility mistaken for servility. It
was perhaps, for this reason, that among the 99 cardinals who voted
for him, were prominent supporters of Freemasonry and the Jesuits.
But Pope John Paul's demeanor hid an iron will and determination of
a man who, once his mind was made up, could not be dissuaded from
carrying out what he believed he should do. The liberal cardinals
who voted for him in the mistaken belief that Pope John could be
easily manipulated where shocked to hear that he intended
the Freemasons in the Vatican hierarchy, and intended to terminate
the big business inside the Church.
Pablo Panerai, editor of "Il Mondo," a leading newspaper in Rome had
specifically attacked what he called "Vatican Inc." Panerai named
Menini and Paul Marcinkus and criticized their links with Sindona's
and the Continental Illinois Bank of Chicago. Panerai shocked the
Vatican by sharply attacking Bishop Marcinkus for sitting on the
board of the Cisalpine Overseas Bank of Nassau, Bahamas.
This was enough for Pope John Paul I to take action. On August 27,
1978, he invited his Secretary of State, Cardinal Villot, to have
supper with him in his private apartment. There is one loose end
here that is bothersome: Pope John knew that
Villot's name appeared
on Gelli's P2 list of more than 100 Catholic Freemasons in the
Vatican. This list was seized when the Italian police raided Gelli's
villa. Why then, did the pope forewarn Villot of what he was about
That evening over supper, Pope John Paul I ordered Villot to prepare
a list of the Freemasons in high places in the Vatican. He told
Villot that it was beyond the pale for Catholics to belong to a
secret organization which, he said, was dedicated to the destruction
of Christianity, as recorded by three previous popes and confirmed
by Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati.
He then ordered that once Villot completed his task,
there was to be a spectacular reshuffling of the Freemasons; they
were to be scattered abroad where they could do less harm to the
Church. According to my Vatican intelligence sources, Villot was at
first angry, then stunned arguing that such sweeping changes would
only bring chaos. But like so many others, Villot underestimated the
iron-willed determination of his Pope. Luciani remained adamant; his
order stood. Villot was to have the list ready without delay.
Those who had the most to lose were Marcinkus, Calvi, Sindona,
De Stroebel and Menini in "Vatican Inc.," while leading Jesuits
stood to lose all power and influence if their names appeared on the
Villot list Villot himself had a lot to lose as a member of the
exclusive financial club in the Vatican, the Administration of the
Patrimony of the Holy See. He would lose his position as its head,
as well as his position as Vatican Secretary of State. For Villot,
perhaps even more than the others, it was absolutely necessary to
prevent Luciani's order from being carried out.
One month later, on Sept 28,1978, Villot was again invited to supper
at the Pope's private apartment Luciani sought to calm Villot's
fears, speaking in French, one of the many languages in which he was
fluent. According to Cardinal Benelli, who was present, it had no
impact on Villot's icy demeanor. In a firm voice, Luciani demanded
that his orders for the list of Freemasons be carried out forthwith.
The pope said he was disturbed by reports from Cardinal Bennelli
that Instituto per la Opera di Religione (OPR, the Vatican bank) was
involved in improper business dealings. He wanted Monsignor de
Bomnis, Marckinkus, De Stroebel and Ortolani dismissed, and OPR's
links with Sindona and Calvi severed immediately.
Luciani had unleashed a chain of events that would lead to his
undoing. Others, who imagined that their power was enough to
override the power of Freemasonry, failed to realize how flawed
their beliefs were. Pope Clement XIV may have been aware of his fate
when he whispered, "I am undone," as he signed the Bull to break up
The details of what Luciani proposed to do were given to Cardinal
Benelli, and the Pope called his close friend, Cardinal Colombo, in
Milan and confided the details in him. This was confirmed by Father
Diego Lorenzi, who made the call for Pope John and heard what passed
between them. But for this, there would have been no record of what
Pope John Paul I demanded of Villot; the papal document containing
instructions to Villot to deliver the names of the Freemasons was
Shortly after his meeting with Villot, on the evening of Sept.
28,1978, Pope John Paul retired to his study. Curiously, that night
there was no medical doctor on duty in the Vatican, and even more
curious, no guard was posted outside Pope John's apartment Between
the hours of 9:30 p.m., that evening and 4:30 a.m., the next
morning, Pope John Paul I was murdered. A reading lamp that burned
the whole night was seen by a Swiss Guard, yet nothing was done by
Vatican security to check upon the unusual circumstance. Pope John
Paul I was the first pope to die unattended, but not the first to
die at the hands of poisoners.
Villot featured prominently in the cover up of the death of Luciani.
When called by Sister Vicenza, who attended to Luciani's simple
needs, and was the first to discover the Pope's body on September
29., Villot slipped a bottle of Efortil, a medication prescribed for
Pope John that was on the nightstand, into his pocket. He then
removed Luciani's glasses and slippers. Next, Villot went to Pope
John's desk and removed the last will and testament of his Pope. He
then walked out of the apartment without saying a word to Sister
Vicenza, who was present. Sister Vicenza described Villof s peculiar
behavior to Cardinal Belleni. When queried about his actions by
Belleni, Villot denied Sister Vicenza's report. He also lied about
the circumstances in which Luciano's body was found.
Others who perished at the hands of a poisoners were President
Zachary Taylor, who paid with his life for refusing to carry out
orders of Freemasonry. The orders were issued by Mazzini's
representative De Leon, founder of Young America, a Freemasonic
movement. On the evening of July 4,1850, Taylor took ill and began
vomiting up a
thick black substance. He died a slow and painful death, which
doctors put down to "drinking too much cold milk and eating too many
cherries." But this did not explain the thick, black substance.
Vomiting of such a severe nature would indicate the presence of a
deadly poison. As in the case of Pope John Paul I, no autopsy was
performed on Taylor, and the manner of his death was most casually
described by doctors who could not possibly have known its exact
cause. In this regard, the death of Pope John Paul I was similarly
handled in a most cavalier fashion by the Vatican physician, Dr. Buzzonnetti, who should have had the utmost suspicion of foul play.
The murder of Congressman Louis T. McFadden came as a result of his
frontal assault on the Federal Reserve Board and the
Banks, the most sacred cow of many sacred cows of the secret
government of America. McFadden was chairman of the House Banking
Committee in 1920. He openly attacked the governors of the Federal
Reserve Board and accused them of causing the 1929 Wall Street
McFadden's war on the Federal Reserve reverberated throughout
Washington. George Stimpson, founder of the National Press Club,
said that McFadden's charges against the governors were incredible
and that the community could not believe what McFadden was saying.
But when McFadden was accused of being mad, it was Stimpson who said
he didn't believe it for a minute.
McFadden waged a tireless war against the Federal Reserve for more
than 10 years, exposing some of the most vile crimes of the 20th
Century. One of McFadden's most stinging charges was that the
Federal Reserve system treasonably conspired to destroy the constitutional government of the United States. He also attacked President
Roosevelt and the international bankers.
On Friday, June 10,1932, speaking before the House, McFadden made
the following statement
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt
institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal
Board and the Federal Reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a
government board, has cheated the United States and its people out
of enough money to pay the national debt...
This evil institution
has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has
bankrupted itself and has practically bankrupted our government It
has done this through the defects of the law under which it
operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Federal
Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed
vultures who control it.."
In a fiery and impassioned speech before the House on May 23,1933,
McFadden said as follows:
"Mr. Chairman, there is not a man within the sound of my voice who
does not know that this country has fallen into the hands of the
international money changers, and there are few Members here who do
not regret it. Mr. Chairman, we are on Concord Bridge today. Our
enemy, the same treacherous enemy, is advancing upon us. Mr.
Chairman, I will die in my tracks before I yield him a square inch
of American soil or so much as one dollar of his war debt to us.
"Mr. Chairman, I demand that the gold stock of the United States be
taken from the Federal Reserve banks and placed in the U.S.
Treasury. I demand an audit of the United States government
financial affairs from the top to the bottom. I demand a resumption
of specie payment based on full gold and silver values..."
This denouncement, followed by McFadden's exposure of the
Bonds and Foreign Securities in $100 million worth of German
commercialized reparation bonds, so shook the secret upper-level
parallel government, that conspiracy watchers believe it was at this
juncture that the order was given to permanently silence McFadden.
In all, there were three attempts on McFadden's life.
The first one
happened when he attended a dinner function and suddenly became
violently ill. A medical doctor who sat close to him was able to
pull him back from the jaws of death.
The second attempt happened
when McFadden was alighting from a taxi near the Capitol. Two shots
fired at him, but both missed.
The third, attempt which was
successful, occurred in New York City, where McFadden was attending
another dinner function. Again, he was seized by a violent fit of
retching and died before help could reach him.
succeeded in ridding the international bankers and the Federal
Reserve Board of Governors of the one man who might have gone on to
fully expose their activities and turn the nation against them,
thereby forcing an end to their control over our money system.
Dr. Hendrik Verwoerd was the father of "apartheid" in South Africa.
A native of Holland, Dr. Verwoerd strode across the South African
political landscape like a colossus. Fearless and scornful of the
Oppenheimer machine and the liberal politicians it controlled, Dr.
Verwoerd lost no time in attacking the international bankers and
their lackeys in South Africa.
Dr. Verwoerd despised the United Nations and sharply criticized its
interference in South Africa's internal affairs, particularly its
invitation for India to discuss discrimination against Indians in
South Africa. The Indians were descendants of indentured laborers
brought to South Africa by Cecil John Rhodes. As a class, they had
achieved tremendous prosperity, mostly at the expense of the native
Bantu, this being attributed to the Jan. 13,1949 riots between the
Zulus and the Indians in Durban, which left 100 dead and more than
1,000 injured. The majority of victims were Indians.
Dr. Verwoerd would not have anything to do with the Indians,
claiming that their leaders were all communists. In later years,
after his murder, his claim appears to have been substantiated by
the fact that legal representation for Indians and blacks accused of
political crimes had fallen into the hands of Indian lawyers, all of
whom belonged to the Indian Congress, an organization with ties to
On April 27,1950, the Group Areas Bill was introduced, the
primary purpose of which was to separate the races into different
areas. Following rioting in April of 1953, new anti-terrorist
legislation was introduced and put into effect At this point, the
Committee of 300
found a stooge in one Alan Paton, an whose book "Cry the Beloved
Country" was artificially made into an internationally recognized
piece of literature. Paton was a favorite of the liberals, who made
something of a hero out of what was a thoroughly disagreeable man.
Paton founded the Liberal Party which favored the vote for "all
civilized people." In this he had the backing of the mighty
Oppenheimer machine. Evidence of these accusations can be found in
the files of the "Sunday Times," an Oppenheimer-owned Johannesburg
Dr. Verwoerd was elected as prime minister on Sept, 3, 1958. On Oct.
5, 1960, a referendum approved a proposal to establish a republican
form of government and end membership in the British Commonwealth.
On May 31, 1961, Dr. Verwoerd was accorded a hero's welcome upon his
return from London, where he delivered his bombshell withdrawal
statement to the British Parliament. The United Nations immediately
asked its member-states to ban the sale of military equipment to the
Republic of South Africa.
The political lines were drawn as the third Anglo-Boer War got under
way. On April 20, 1964, a so-called panel of U.N. experts issued
a report calling for a non-racial democracy in South Africa, totally
ignoring the caste system which had been in force for hundreds
of years in India. The caste system, a strict segregation of social
classes, far more severe than anything seen in South Africa, remains
in force. Still to this day, the United Nations remains silent on
"apartheid" in India.
Dr. Verwoerd ruled the country in an orderly manner and tolerating
no black or Indian anti-government groups. On June 12,1964, Nelson
Mandela and seven blacks were caught red-handed manufacturing bombs
and in possession of banned Communist literature. Mandela's mentors
— the instigators of these crimes — Abrams and Wolpe, fled the
country, but Mandela and his followers were sentenced to life
imprisonment for acts of sabotage, theft, violent crimes and
attempts to subvert the government
The trial was scrupulously fairly conducted under South Africa's
independent judicial system. Mandela was jailed for common criminal activities, and not for political reason. Records of the case
which I studied in the Rand Supreme Court, clearly state the nature
of the civil criminal acts of which Mandela was found guilty. It is
the Western press that has obscured this truth, and made out that
Mandela was jailed for political reasons. There was never any
attempt by the United States and Britain to be objective about
On Sept 6,1966, Dr. Verwoerd was stabbed to death by a messenger
while Parliament was in session in Cape Town. The messenger was well
known as he had worked in that capacity for years, and was a
familiar figure as he moved freely around the floor delivering
papers and documents to various members. The obvious conclusion that
foreign elements were involved in the assassination were suggested
by the police. Already, the dark forces were at work to destroy the
Republic of South Africa.
The assassin was described as "mentally deranged", but intelligence
agents around the world believed that he was programmed to commit
the murder, knowing what we know today about intelligence agencies
use of hypnotism. The assassin had never previously shown any signs
of mental disorder before his attack on Dr. Verwoerd. The question
is, "who gave the order to murder Verwoerd and who did the
programming?" Only two intelligence agencies had the power at that
time to carry out missions involving mind control; the CIA and the
KGB. Nothing could be proved, but the consensus of opinion is that
the murder was the work of the CIA.
In 1966, secret experiments carried out by the CIA using
mind-altering rays was not in the public domain and remained secret
up until John Markus, in 1977, and Gordon Thomas, in 1990, fully
exposed the conduct of the CIA in this field. There are experts
today who firmly believe that Dr. Verwoerd was one of the first
victims of these CIA experiments.
Like many others, I wrote a substantive work on the assassination of
John F. Kennedy. Many of the claims I made could not be substantiated
at the time, but now, other independent sources are coming forward
to confirm what I said. Thus far, none of perpetrators of these
crimes has been caught and it is unlikely that any of them will ever
be apprehended. The threat of assassination by whatever method still
hangs over all national leaders, especially in the United States,
where if someone takes it upon himself to let the truth be known,
the possibility of coming to harm cannot be discounted.
One such source is Robert Morrow, a former contract employee of the
CIA. Morrow confirms that Kennedy had to die because he was not
liked by the CIA and because he had given notice that he would get
rid of both Hoover and Lyndon Johnson. Morrow confirmed what I said
about Tippit; that he was sent to kill Oswald to stop him from
talking, but that Oswald, recognizing him, shot him first.
Morrow also confirmed what I said about Oswald going to a movie
house after the shooting for a rendezvous with Jack Ruby. Morrow
further confirmed that Oswald never shot Kennedy, and that at the
time of the shooting, Oswald was on the second floor of the Texas
School Book Depository, drinking a Coke and eating a sandwich.
Morrow also believes that Kennedy was killed by a shot from the
front which came from a grassy knoll situated in front of the
motorcade. He also confirmed my account of the President's limousine
being hustled away from the scene and shipped away for dismantling
before anyone could do any full-scale forensic work on it.
Morrow makes some interesting allegations; one in particular has it
that George Bush was given the job of Director of Central
Intelligence (DCI) for the sole purpose of preventing the Church
Senate committee from getting all of the facts about the Kennedy
assassination, which he did.
Morrow also claims that Bush knows
everything there is to know about Kennedy's assassination.
Back to Contents