DIPLOMACY BY DECEPTION
9 - Yugoslavia
That Serbia has always been a trouble-maker in the Balkans can be
seen from the event that led to the First World War. That event was
the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand on June 28,1914, while on a
visit to Sarajevo. The assassin, Gavrilo Princip, who, together with
his accomplices, acted for the Serbian secret society known as
"Union or Death" (the Black Hand) was founded in 1911 by Serbia and
was used to foment agitation against Austria on behalf of Serbian
The Serbian government knew all about the plot, and did nothing to
prevent it. Europe was outraged by the crime, especially in the
light of the years of intolerable activity by Serbia. On July 5,
1914, Count Alexander Hoyos was sent to Berlin and said "...I am
here to settle for once and for all the problems of constant Serbian
agitation and to demand justice for Austria." What was revealed by
the Hoyos visit was that Serbia was a real problem, a troublemaker
of the first waters, bent on acquiring territory and setting up a
On July 23 1914, Austria delivered a written ultimatum to Serbia:
Dissolution of publications and organizations engaged in hostile
Dismissal of officials accused by Austria of anti-Austrian
Cessation of anti-Austrian propaganda in schools.
Collaboration with the Austrian government in fixing responsibility for the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand.
Judicial proceedings against those responsible for the plot
The arrest of two Serbian officials known to be involved.
It becomes clear upon examining the history of the period that the
Serbs were devious to a degree unknown before in the Balkans. Even
before making its response, the Serbs mobilized for war against
Austria. Their official response looked on the surface to be
conciliatory, but upon close examination, was actually a rejection
of Austrian demands.
Serbia had also secretly obtained assurances
from Russia that it would not permit Serbia to be attacked, and
privately, Serbia received the same promise from the British
On July 28, 1914, Austria declared war on Serbia, followed by a
bombardment of Belgrade, with Germany urging occupation of Serbia.
There followed declarations of war by scores of other nations:
August 1, Germany on Russia.
August 3, Germany on France.
Great Britain on Germany.
August 5, Montenegro on Austria.
Serbia on Germany.
August 6, Austria on Russia.
August 8, Montenegro
Afterward, there was an explosion of declarations of war, Japan on
Germany, Serbia on Turkey, Bulgaria on Serbia, culminating in 1918
with Guatemala on Germany, Nicaragua on Germany and Austria, Costa
Rica on Germany, Haiti and Honduras on Germany. Russia was
unfortunately not able to see the broader picture: that it was being
set up by Great Britain for the coming Bolshevik Revolution, and
Tsar Nicholas walked right into the trap which the devious Serbs and
the even more dubious British had laid for him.
On May 7, 1915, at the instigation of Great Britain, the allies gave
Serbia a guarantee of the eventual acquisition of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, which included a guarantee of "wide access to the
Adriatic." Herein lies the root cause of Serbian aggression against
these states which, in 1993, is threatening to once again engulf
Europe in a devastating war. Throughout the four decades of unrest,
terrorism, war and Serbian territorial ambitions can be seen the
hand of the British Black Nobility, personified by Sir Edward Grey,
the man most responsible for dragging the United States into the
First World War. Today the players are Lord David Owen, Lord
Carrington, Cyrus Vance and Warren Christopher.
On Dec. 18, 1916, the so-called Wilson proposals were made public,
among which was the British government's demand that Serbia and
Montenegro be restored. In the light of U.S. intervention on the
side of Great Britain in 1916, we should not be surprised at the
present agitation to get the United States involved, through the
dispatch of the Council on Foreign Relations Secretary of State
Warren Christopher, to create a wider war in the Balkans. It has all
been done before.
A short history of Yugoslavia reveals the presence of the British
oligarchical machinations. On July 20,1917, under tremendous
pressure from the League of Nations forerunner of the United Nations,
and from Britain and Italy, the Fact of Corfu was signed by
Croatians, Serbs and Montenegrans. To the Serbs, signing the pact
meant the first step toward a Serbian dynasty in the Balkans, in
which the Hapsburgs would play a crucial role. Croatians, backed by
the Catholic Church, opposed the pact, but were powerless to prevent
its implementation. Thus a single nation under a Serbian dynasty
took a step closer to becoming a reality.
On Nov. 3, 1918, Germany was forced to accept defeat in the First
World War, thanks to U.S. military intervention, as planned by Grey,
Col. House (Mandel Huis) and President Wilson. At the instigation of
the British government, a "Yugoslavian Conference" was held at
Geneva, and the kingdom of Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia was pro
claimed on Dec. 4, 1918.
The Serbs immediately began acts of aggression against Croatia in
attempts to assert their rights to Croatian territory, in spite of
what they had signed in Geneva.
On Nov. 26, 1917, the Montenegrans
proclaimed union with Serbia and Prince Alexander accepted the new
state. The history of this region from this point on sets out rather
clearly all the deceit, dissembling and outright lying which led to
present conflict, in which the British government played a leading
As I have so often stressed, the enemy of free people everywhere is
not so much Communism, but the secret all-powerful upper-level
parallel government in Washington, which, in fact, has always
regarded Communists everywhere as allies, while never admitting that
Communism and Socialism were created in Great Britain and the
Nowhere is this more in evidence than in Yugoslavia and South
Africa. The Babylonian monetary system, falsely called "capitalism,"
is a far greater threat to Western civilization than the doctrines
of Karl Marx, since it creates global conditions and then
manipulates them for their One World Government New World Order
masters for the benefit of the international bankers.
This tyrannical oligarchical bloc was established decades ago to
strip nations of their sovereignty, cultural heritage and natural
resources. In the case of South Africa, the Anglo-Boer War
(1899-1902), it took the form of mass genocide and was an attempt to
crush the Dutch language and the Christian religion of the people.
This was combined with wholesale theft of massive amounts of gold,
diamonds, platinum, titanium, iron ore and other metals and
The wheel of misfortune has gone the full circle in South Africa,
with "Judas Iscariot" Pieter Botha selling his soul to the One World
Government and "Kerensky" Willem De Klerk, betraying his people in a
manner that would have made Benedict Arnold blush. The excuse in the
case of South Africa, was "apartheid", the Biblical doctrine which
advocated separation of races, while in India, the far worse caste
system of separation, instigated by British occupation, was allowed
to flourish undisturbed, as it does to this day. "Apartheid" in
India is far more rigorous than anything seen in South Africa.
Based on the laughable concern for the welfare of the black
population, a convicted felon. Nelson Mandela, whose crimes included
burglary, terrorism, making bombs and treason, was suddenly made
over into a national hero by the jackals of the media, as was his
collection of fellow criminals led by Indian lawyers and Communist
Joe Slovo. This will be the new government of South Africa, once De
Klerk has handed over power to Mandela. The people of South Africa
are only now waking up to the fact, with shock and horror, that
Moscow played only a very minor role in their betrayal. The major
players are Washington and London.
The supranational government, under the direction of the Committee
of 300, uses its agenda on the destruction of the sovereignty of
nations directly in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzogovina, and in the
United States, where it is busy making the U.S. Constitution
subservient to the United Nations Charter, treacherously and
treasonably introduced by the CFR and passed by the U.S. Senate in
1945, with only five Senators on record as actually having read the
Croatia, a 10,000 year old nation, was a victim of the same
conspirators who have so greatly damaged the world. Under the
pretext that it had sided with Germany in WWII, Croatia began to
feel the heat of the poison-pen writers of the media in the United
States. Despite a democratically elected government, despite its
accepted sovereignty by the United Nations, the European Economic
Community, the secret government of America set out to smash Croatia,
which had only very reluctantly accepted the unity forced upon it by
the "Allies" on Dec. 4, 1918.
Fully backed by Great Britain and the United States, the Serb plan
palled for grabbing as much territory as possible so that eventually
when the Serbs had what they wanted, the United Nations would be
railed in to "adjudicate." This would be on the basis of territory
held and occupied by Serbian nationals; hence the need to drive out
Croatians and Muslims to the fullest extent the Serbs could get away
with. Herein is the origin of "ethnic cleansing."
President George Bush made it clear where he stood on Nov. 9,1991:
"We see in Yugoslavia how the proud name of nationalism can splinter
a country into bloody civil war."
This was the "line" of the
British government also; national sovereignty must be relegated to
the background of history for the sake of the
New World Order.
Of all the Christian leaders, only Pope John Paul II had the courage
to speak out against the Serbs, less than four days after Bush gave
President Milosevic the green light. Many Protestant church leaders
remained conspicuously silent:
"An end must be put to this tragedy which dishonors Europe and the
world. In the last few days there have been attacks of incredible
violence all over Croatia, but especially on Dubrovnik and Vukovar.
In Dubrovnik, a hotel and a hospital full of refugees and wounded
has been hit, among others. If s aggression, and it must end. I beg
the Yugoslavian Army to spare the lives of defenseless civilians."
The Belgrade government's response was to escalate the shelling of
civilian housing, churches, schools and hospitals, knowing full well
that the Bush administration would take no action to stop the
In one of his most insidious moves, Slobodan Milosevic called upon
the United Nations to send "peacekeeping forces" to divide the two
sides. This was accepted by the United Nations, which, through the
stationing of its troops, tacitly accepted the land seized by the
Yugoslavian military as now belonging to Serbia. The same treachery
was repeated in Bosnia Herzogovina. Lord Carrington, the betrayer of
NATO and Rhodesia, obligingly had the United Nations deploy its
soldiers in what he called crisis areas thereby neatly fulfilling
the Yugoslavian objective.
Ably assisted by Lawrence Eagleburger, Cyrus Vance and the Bush
administration, Germany was threatened with economic reprisals if it
moved to recognize the independence of Croatia and
Bosnia-Herzogovina. Eagleburger, who was castigated by Congressman
Henry Gonzalez because of his extensive financial links to the
Belgrade Government, said that the United States should never allow
any European nation to recognize Croatia and Bosnia-Herzogovina's
independence. Vance, fulfilling a role in the plan drawn up by the
Inter-Religious Peace Colloquium held in Bellagio, Italy in 1972,
announced that it was "too dangerous" to recognize the independence
of Bosnia and Croatia, but Vance did not say what he really meant:
that it was really "too dangerous" for the New World Order-One World
Pope John Paul II put a spoke in the Bush plan by letting it be
known that he would "send a message to the Republics recognizing
their independence." The announcement sent Shockwaves through the
Committee of 300 and the Washington and London establishments,
helping persuade Germany to recognize Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Serbian leader Milosevic dropped "Yugoslavia" in favor of "Greater
Serbia." All Serbian regular and irregular military units are now
concentrated on taking over the maximum territory before the United
States and Britain are forced by public pressure to make a feeble
attempt to call a halt to his villainous actions. The model on which
Milosevic based his territorial ambitions is the one formulated by
the British during the 1923 Lausanne conference, where a plan for
the mass expulsions of the civilian population of Greece and Turkey
was accepted and caused thousands of deaths. It is also an almost
carbon copy of how Lebanon was carved up.
The Bush administration, fully aware of the Serbian strategy, went
along with it. Both Britain and the United States closed their eyes
to the slaughter going on in the Balkans, where mass genocide and
acquisition of territory is occurring so fast, that unless an
immediate stop is put to Milosevic's advance, it will be too late.
There have been some changes; whereas in Croatia, most of the
population was driven out, now, in Bosnia, especially in the Muslim
areas, citizens are being willfully slaughtered.
The refugee problem is being taken care of by death on a scale not
seen since WWII. Entire villages and small towns have been
destroyed, their inhabitants, old and young, shot down, or
deliberately hit by shell and mortar fire.
sources told me that,
"almost 68 percent of Bosnia is in danger of
being eliminated, people, churches, schools and homes. This is the
worst kind of terror we have experienced in the past seventy years."
''What about the U.N. troops" I asked, "what are they doing to
protect the Bosnians? Isn't that what they are supposed to be there
My source said "U.N. forces are actually working on the side
of the Serbs, who are not supposed to be fighting inside captured
Bosnian territory, patrolled by the U.N., but the Serbs simply uses
U.N. troops as a shield. U.N. forces on the other hand, prevent the
Bosnian forces from retaking territory lost to the Serbs; U.N.
forces stand in their way, but do nothing to prevent Serbian forces
from attacking from behind the blue helmets."
The Serbians used the
so-called "demilitarized zones" to move in heavy artillery and
tanks. Bosnian leaders are now sure that the U.N. forces are
promoting Lord Carrington's Lausanne plan: while Lord Owen talks
"peace", the Serbs brush past the U.N. forces.
Everything that the United States and Britain have done up to now,
including the mockery of so-called "sanctions" against Serbia, has
been a plus for Milosevic; he was able to tell Serbians that they
are the victim of "British and U.S. aggression," while not suffering
any deprivation from toothless sanctions. Even the "Washington Post"
admitted that sanctions are not making any difference, and concluded
that fighting will not stop until the Serbs have satisfied their
As always in the case of world political strategy, the British
government leads the way when it comes to inflicting pain and
suffering on other nations. Lord Carrington, a former "negotiator"
whose black record of treason and treachery could fill two volumes,
claims that "both sides are lying," the oldest trick in the book
used to distort truth.
The London "Daily Telegraph" said that no aid
of any kind should be given to Bosnia, not even food:
"It just makes it easier for them to go on fighting. They'd stop
sooner if we left them to starve and die of their wounds or disease.
You've got to be cruel to be kind. There are times when if s a rough
decision to sit by and see others suffer, but it is the right one
all the same."
The British government should know. During the Anglo-Boer War
(1899-1902), when they were unable to defeat an insignificant
irregular Boer force, Lord Kitchener rounded up all Boer women and
children, put them in concentration camps, and left them to die of
starvation and disease. Some 25,000 Boer women and children perished, which by comparison, would have meant that 17-18 percent of
the U.S. population would have succumbed to the barbarity. Apparently, Lord Carrington and Lord Owen are repeating the Kitchener
tactic in Bosnia and Croatia.
One thing is sure: a coward at heart like all bullies, Milosevic
would never have dared to destroy human life and property unless he
knew that he would not be stopped and suffer no reprisals from
Britain and the United States. Milosevic has no intention of ending
the fighting until he has captured 100 percent of
Bosnia-Herzogovina. Unless he is stopped soon, the fighting is
likely to spill over into Kosovo, which is an ethnic Albanian
Turkey has already pledged to come to the aid of Muslims if Kosovo
is attacked. Turkey would use its pact with Albania as a
justification of such an action. If this happens, the danger of war
engulfing all of Europe will be that much greater, because refugees
would flood into Macedonia, which has a substantial Albanian-Muslim
population. If Turkey does come to the aid of Muslims, we can expect
Greece to object, thus laying the groundwork for rapid escalation
into a major war.
Right now, Macedonia is being treated to "Perfidious Albion" strategy, which means that everything that can be done is being done to
undermine the Macedonian government, which was democratically
elected on Sep. 1,1991, and received its new constitution on Nov.
17, 1991. From intelligence reports I have been receiving, it
appears as though political isolation is being encouraged from
London, which will make it easier for the Serbian population to call
for help, opening the door for an attack by the Serbian Army on
Macedonia. My intelligence source told me "this is almost certain to
occur once Bosnia is finished off."
The Owen-Carrington-Vance peace plan for Bosnia is a grisly farce.
It will accomplish for the Serbs what they set out to do, without
further loss of life to them. The plan calls for the partitioning of
Bosnia, giving the Serbs a greater share of Bosnia, without the
slightest guarantee that once signed and peace is declared, the
Serbs wont return to mop up what is left of the Bosnians and,
especially, end its centuries old Muslim presence.
Lord Carrington expressed his disdain for the people of Bosnia
Hezegovina in the "Times" of London on May 13,1992:
"If people want to fight, there are
only two options. Either let them fight, or separate them
forcefully. This implies that Bosnia
and Croatia elected to fight Serbian aggression for no valid reason,
with Serbia as the aggressor, and that this is a family quarrel, or,
a civil war."
This is not a fight, it is an attempt by Croatia and
Bosnia to prevent their land being taken from them and their people
and culture obliterated.
We can fairly well deduce that Great Britain has been in charge of
Balkans operations since before the First World War. It is said that
MI6 actually runs many countries, and this is no exaggeration. How
is this done? Mainly through deep cover intelligence work authorized
by the British monarch, which at present, is Queen Elizabeth II.
MI6 answers only to the monarch, and Queen Elizabeth II has been far
more active than most in the affairs of MI6. Of course she can do
this, because the funding conies entirely from her purse. Queen
Elizabeth gets briefed by "M" Section of MI6 on a daily basis, which
makes her better-informed than the President of the United States.
Her interest in the Balkans, as a British operation, is
In the present Yugoslavian operation which began in early 1984,
British intelligence is in complete control. In preparation for
coming events, large amounts of gunpowder were ordered for
Yugoslavia from South Africa which, at that time, made the best
quality gunpowder in the world. Much of South Africa's production
went to Iran in 1984, but then, on orders from someone in London,
Yugoslavia began siphoning off substantial quantities from these
shipments for its own use. Intelligence reports to which I was privy
revealed that the financial side was handled by Arbuthnot Latham
Bank in London, for both the Iranian and Yugoslavian shipments. The
build up in arms went on in the years leading up to the
"constitutional crisis" in Yugoslavia.
The "constitutional crisis" arose at the instigation of MI6 on May
15, 1991, with Milosevic, his MI6-trained "Bolsheviks" and a
militant faction in the Serbian Army blocking the system of
collective State Presidents, rotated between Serbia, Croatia,
Slovenia, Macedonia, Montenegro and Bosnia. This happened at at the
time when it was the turn of Croatia's Stipe Mesic to take up the
This action also blocked the move for a constitutional agreement to
be signed by all of the parties to make four separate republics, as
demanded by popular elections. Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Macedonia
had agreed to become a confederation of states. Had this happened,
MI6 control would have been considerably weakened. The intention of
Milosevic acting on MI6 instructions, was to start a war in which
Serbia, with the strongest military, could grab territory which did
not belong to it.
Mesic went on Belgrade Radio to denounce the inflammatory move by
"This is not an inter-ethnic conflict, but a crisis
provoked by Bolshevik-Serbian expansionism."
These prophetic words
went right over the heads of most Western leaders and the people of
the world; to them it was just a storm in a teacup, and not the
beginning of the Third World War. Even at that juncture, all was not
hopeless; Serbia was isolated with only the support of Montenegro,
and it looked as if MI6 might be thwarted.
As has been a Committee of 300 custom for years, the United States
stepped into the conflict in order to do the dirty work for the
British. Bush intervened in Yugoslavia just as he did in the Gulf
War. On May 20, 1991, Bush announced that all U.S. aid to Yugoslavia
would be suspended. Bush knew too well that his action would
destabilize a delicate situation and bring on a shooting war, yet he
persisted on the specious grounds that "Yugoslavia is conducting
severe repression in Kosovo." Even the timing of the announcement
was highly suspect -
Serbia was then in its third year of violence against the
non-Serbians in Kosovo - a pattern it was to follow in Croatia and
Bosnia, and will soon follow in Macedonia.
What was the reason for the created crisis?
The British government
wanted to prevent German trade expansion into the Danube Basin, as
well as bring about a restructuring of the Balkans into small states
that would be easy to control. As the crisis widened, Russia issued
a warning that the Balkans could once again become the tinderbox
that could spark a major war in Europe. Addressing its comments very
pointedly toward London, Moscow said,
"there is a very fine line
between good offices and interference in internal affairs."
By now seemingly of little import to the West, Serbian-backed guerrillas began attacking Croatia, with Moscow's blessing. Bluntly
stating that Russia would oppose any moves to support independent
states, Moscow warned that,
"to enter on one side of the conflict
would mean coming into conflict with others inside and outside of
Yugoslavia, a conflict which could grow into an all-European one."
Moscow went on supplying military backing for the Serbs.
Germany said that "attempts to change borders by force are totally
unacceptable" and hinted that Britain, Russia and the United States
were trying to help carve out a Greater Serbia, a very factual
observation. Bush had met with Gorbachev just before the German
statement was made in August. Yet in spite of every warning that a
major war was in the making, the United States and Britain did
nothing to so advise their people, nor did they take any action to
halt Serbian expansionist acts of war.
On August 6, Dutch Foreign Minister Van den Broek issued a dire
warning to his European colleagues:
"Our mission in Yugoslavia has failed. At the moment, there is
nothing that we can do here, but we want the world to know that it
was the Serbian side that has been responsible for the collapse of
the talks. Yugoslavia now faces tragedy and catastrophe."
den Broek did not say was that the Serbian intransigence was
secretly backed by London, Washington and Moscow. The principal
intriguer for the
United States was Vance. The flames of the Third World War were
rising higher and faster, yet no one seemed to be paying any
attention to the danger.
Top secret intelligence information shown to me describes the
Serbian-British expansionist plans more or less as follows:
The Serbians would launch an assault and carve out new borders with
Croatia-Slovenia. The town of Vinkovci, an important rail center,
would be the focal point of the attack. This would displace 170,000
Croatians and leave room to move in Serbians to expand the existing
Serbian population of 29,000. This is what happened: the first
"ethnic cleansing" had begun, without any real protest from London
or Washington. How could there be any, after all it was done in
conformity with U.S.-British strategy for the Balkans.
The British plan, designed by MI6, supports a "Greater Yugoslavia"
which would seek a return to pre-1915 borders in the Balkans. I will
say that 1915 was the optimum year in the Serbian war against
Austria, a war which resulted in considerably expanded Serbian
boundaries, and all MI6 is doing is picking up from where it left
off in 1915.
British intelligence told Milosevic to drop the Communist label and
immediately begin to push a Serbian homeland, which is what the
media jackals in the United States also did. In the first step
toward implementing the British plan, the towns of Karolbag,
Karlovac and Virovitica were overrun by Serbian irregulars under the
command of Vojslav Seselj, who committed all kinds of atrocities and
then told a London newspaper,
"... the Croats must move or die... We
don't want any other nationalities on our territories, and we will
fight for our true borders."
In all of this, the CIA apparently closed its eyes, as did the Bush
administration. Had resolute action been taken by the United States
at that point, there would have been no further "ethnic cleansing."
Can we imagine the CIA and the Clinton administration closing its
eyes if White South Africa adopted Milosevic's tactics and drove the
black tribes to their homelands with great violence and bloodshed?
No doubt there would be a world-wide outcry, and we would see the
United Nations, Britain and the United States rush troops to South
Africa, quicker than the blinking of an eye. The hypocrisy of these
powers in their dealings with Serbia and South Africa is atrocious.
There is no doubt that there was no action to stop Serbian
atrocities and land grabbing because of Zionist pressure. The
Zionists hope to use mass population transfers to solve what they
call "the Palestinian problem." Zionist writer Sholomo Tadmor had
expressed such an opinion, and quoted as support for his views, the
mass transfer of Hindus and Muslims at the time of the separation of
Pakistan and India, overseen by Lord Louis Mountbatten. Mountbatten
was assassinated, some say with the foreknowledge of MI5, because
his alleged homosexual activities were becoming an embarrassment to
Queen Elizabeth. "Uncle Dicky" it was alleged, was coming out of the
closet a little too often, and refused to heed the advise of MI5 to
be more circumspect about his private life.
Serbian ties with Zionism play an important role in the tragedy
prophesied by Dutch Foreign Minister Van den Broek. The savage
attacks on Germany and Croatia, specifically the "Nazi" epithets
hurled at Croatian President Tudjman and German Chancellor Kohl
speak volumes. According to my intelligence contact, European
efforts to bring about a workable solution to the problem "were
sabotaged from the inside by Britain and sources in Jerusalem."
Apparently the British method of a balance of powers in France,
Russia, Turkey and the United States is the predetermined course.
By September of 1991, it had become perfectly clear that the Serbs
intended carving up Croatia and Bosnia-Herzogovina, which would be
followed by an "ethnic cleansing" of Macedonia. British intelligence reports made it clear that the Balkans program was on track
and proceeding according to plan. All demands to halt Serbian
aggression by European Community foreign ministers in Brussels were
studiously ignored by Milosevic, Whitehall and Washington.
My intelligence source said that not one of the European leaders
dared to disclose that their hands were tied when James Baker III
and British foreign secretary Douglas Hurd gave Milosevic the green
light to launch a full-scale assault on Bosnia-Herzogovenia.
European ministers know very well that it is an exercise in futility
to try and stop the Serbians, who know that they are backed by
London and Washington, hoot at our proposals. Nothing can be done
to stop the Serbian onslaught, unless British and American support
No doubt this is an accurate statement: without British and U.S.
tacit support, Milosevic would not have dared to commit the vile
atrocities that have resulted in almost 250,000 dead, 2 million
wounded and at least 4 million refugees. The Yugoslavian Serbian
position is underpinned by American and British support.
History has proved that the secret government of Britain has an
astonishing success record in achieving its goals through diplomacy
by deception. I call to mind the negotiations over Palestine, which
were fraudulent from beginning and controlled by the head of the
Zionist Federation in Britain, Lord Rothschild.
In September of 1991, it was not Lord Rothschild, but his underling
Lord Carrington, a confirmed Zionist, who stepped forward to negotiate in Yugoslavia. Carrington had gained excellent experience in
wrecking Rhodesia, South Africa, NATO and Argentina. As master
deceiver, Carrington's Sept. 7, 1991 European Community peace
conference held at the Hague in Holland, was a loaded in favor of
Serbia. What the conference achieved was a bolstering of Serbian
aggression, allowing Serbia to redraw the boundaries of Yugoslavia
to the advantage of a Greater Serbia.
By adopting an embargo in trade and economic affairs with Yugoslavia, the conference left it unstated that Croatia was being
punished: the greater part of European trade with Yugoslavia is
conducted by Croatia. Seeming to punish Milosevic, it was Croatia
that felt the weight of the British-sponsored big stick. The peace
conference for Yugoslavia was not supposed to be held unless the
Serbs first stopped fighting, but when Milosevic thumbed his nose at
the condition, the EC delegates went ahead with it anyway, a real
political victory for the Butcher of Belgrade.
After the fraudulent conference, Italian Foreign Minister Gianni de Michelis — who fervently supported the illegal Bush war against Iraq
— flagrantly backed Milosevic by posing the question:
really go to war in Yugoslavia? Would we die for Zagreb? Surely not"
On Sept 19, Lord Carrington, officially accepted that the conference
was a failure. Of course, he did not say that it was planned to fail.
How could it have been a success, when Carrington had refused to
allow any preconditions to be set for the Serbs to meet with the
The British-American sponsored conference was designed to give the
Serbian aggressors all the time needed to grab more land and kill
more Croatians, Muslims and Bosnians. This is precisely what
happened. Also, for the first time, the Yugoslavian Air Force
launched air raids on civilian cities. Fighting continued throughout
the conference without Lord Carrington once chiding Milosevic for
his conduct. It was an almost exact replay of conditions in
Rhodesia: while Carrington talked "peace" and the Rhodesian forces
held their fire, Communist Robert Mugabe continued his murderous
assaults on women and children in isolated communities, with never a
word of criticism from Carrington.
My intelligence source told me that Carrington threatened Germany
with "economic reprisals" if it stepped out of line and offered real
support to the Croats and Bosnians. Lord Carrington laid down his
own secret ruling for a U.N. "peacekeeping" force. After the
conference, Chancellor Kohl requested a meeting with George Bush.
His request was granted on the condition that talk of military
intervention or financial sanctions against Belgrade not be brought
up. The only thing Bush agreed to was that a peacekeeping force be
placed along the lines between Croatia and Serbia, thus giving de
facto recognition to Serbian occupation of Croatian territory.
Primed by the British, Milosevic rejected even such a meaningless
gesture against Serbia, saying that he resented "any foreign
military presence." Kohl was warned that if Germany made any waves,
it could start a major war in the Balkans that could quickly spread
to all of Europe. What Bush did not want to recognize, was that such
a war was already well into its stride, and that nothing would be
allowed to stop it from occurring.
Thus, as the diplomats jawboned, Croatians, Muslims and Bosnians
continued to bleed. Adding his support to the farce, Bush dispatched
long-time Illuminati member and top servant of the Committee of 300
Cyrus Vance to negotiate yet another round of peace talks. Arriving
in Belgrade on October 9, Vance, an original member of the Inter
Religious Peace Colloquium held in 1972 which laid down the basis
for the current actions taking place in Yugoslavia — got maximum
peace coverage from the media.
All that transpired from Vance's visit was that the U.S. State
Department told Americans in Yugoslavia to leave the country and
reduced consular staff at its embassy in Zagreb. Vance's weapons
embargo against the Serbs was again, a total fraud, because he knew
that the Belgrade government had laid up big stocks of gunpowder for
its artillery, and that its own flourishing weapons industry would
not be dented by an American-sponsored embargo. As in the case of
the economic embargo, it was the Croatians, Muslims and Bosnians who
were severely hit by the arms embargo. A more cruel piece of
diplomacy by deception would be hard to find.
On Nov. 6, 1991, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl could contain himself
no longer. Defying the gag order placed on him by Lord Carrington
and George Bush, Kohl told the Bundestag (Parliament) that it was
necessary to immediately recognize the independent republics of
Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzogovina. Kohl was spurred on by the
third rejection of a European peace plan by Milosevic.
My intelligence source told me that Kohl was outraged by the tactics
of Lord Carrington, whose pro-Serbian edicts got more and more
brazen. Carrington had told Milosevic that there would be no demand
for Serbia to respect the Albanian-dominated Kosovo region.
Carrington there and then gave the green light for the Serbians
forces to attack Kosovo, and then march into Macedonia.
privately discussed with his intelligence chiefs the prospect of
freezing all Yugoslavian assets in German banks, and forcing German
investors to My intelligence source told me that when Kohl's secret
discussions were "leaked" to Carrington, he flew into a rage and is
reported to have warned Milosevic of what might be coining.
Milosevic thereupon issued an urgent decree instructing the
Yugoslavian Central Bank to deposit up to 95 percent of its foreign
currency — amounting to almost $5 billion — in Swiss bank accounts.
This was carried out within hours after the Carrington "tip" was
received in Belgrade.
Unsatisfied with the damage he had already done to the independent
republics of Croatia, Slovenia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bush, most
probably on the instructions of the Royal Institute for
International Affairs, traveled to The Hague. On November 9, he
addressed delegates from the European Community. Declaring "there
is no place for these old animosities in the new Europe, and what
we see now in Yugoslavia is how the proud name of nationalism can
splinter a country into civil war." Bush then berated Croatia for
wanting its independence.
Continuing his attack on Croatia, Bush declared,
urgent work of democracy-building and market reform moves forward,
some see in freedom's triumph a bitter harvest. In this view the
collapse of Communism has thrown open a Pandora's box of ancient
ethnic hatreds, resentment and even revenge... All of Europe has been
awakened to the dangers of an old enemy — nationalism — animated by
hatred, unmoved by nobler ends. This nationalism feeds on old stale
prejudice teaches intolerance and suspicion, and even racism and
The tail-end is the key to the Bush speech: striving for
independence must be equated with anti-Semitism. How the connection
is made will not be clear to those who are not familiar with
code-words and intelligence jargon. What was behind the message?
Intelligence contacts of mine who specialize in code-words told me
that the message was aimed at Germany, as a warning not to come to
the rescue of Croatia, Slovenia and Bosnia, lest it be mistaken for
a rise in nationalism which would equated German attempts to help
In the Canadian Parliament, the government was also obliged to show
its hand. On Nov. 18,1991, Foreign Minister Barbara McDougall was
forced to announce that there would be no recognition of the
independent republics of Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. Amid
roars of rage from both sides of the house, McDougall said that she
had been convinced by Carrington and Vance that recognition of the
republics would be a wrong move. There were angry exchanges as the
truly evil, deceptive, backstabbing role of both false "negotiators"
Incredibly McDougall said,
"...recognition of Croatia,
Bosnia and Slovenia at this time would signal the end of the
negotiated process and would leave force and violence to settle the
This is precisely the policy of the Serbians, and what they
have always desired.
Meanwhile, the arms embargo against Yugoslavia continued to be a
joke, as the Serbians kept receiving gun powder from Swedish
merchants, and other arms not produced in Yugoslavia. There was no
end to the weapons train. The Muslims received no arms and Bosnians
received only small amount of rifles and grenades via Iran. These
weapons are no match for Serbian artillery and tanks. The heavily
armed Serbian Army proceeded with its campaign of "dead refugees."
Croatia and Bosnia who had received 7,000 rifles and enough
ammunition to last for 3 months, were pitted against Serbian 155mm
artillery, mortars, heavy machine guns, grenade launchers, tanks and
The Geneva Convention was totally flouted by the Serbians, but then
the United States cannot really complain on this score, for we did
the very same thing in Iraq, if not worse. I do not know-of any
incident to match the barbarous brutality of burying 12,000 Iraqi
soldiers alive. Serbian heavy artillery has rained down a deadly
barrage on churches (probably the number one target), hospitals,
schools and even nursery schools. There was no doubt about the
intention of the Serbians to terrorize, murder and maim as many
civilians as possible.
The future of Bosnia-Herzegovina is undoubtedly very bleak; already
the Serbian aggressors occupy 78 percent of the land mass and are
daily driving all before them in a fearsome onslaught, while the
United Nations dashes up and down side roads and does nothing to
prevent the wholesale terror and slaughter of innocent people.
intelligence source told me,
"[the United Nations is] totally
discredited, they do nothing to help the civilian population, less
still protect them from Serbian atrocities. The U.N. mission in
Bosnia in particular is a sham and a disgrace."
Not satisfied with the havoc it has already wrought in Croatia,
Bosnia-Herzegovina and Slovenia, the Council of Ministers of the
Europeans Community met in Portugal on May 2, 1992 and immediately
issued a statement declining to recognize the independence of the
Republic of Macedonia. It was, in effect, the third time that
destabilization forces from outside of Yugoslavia had stepped into
the arena to ensure that Macedonia is the next target for Serbian
Macedonia is entitled to independence, as are all the Balkan states.
It has territory, a sovereign people, a sovereign parliament, and
the overwhelming support for independence expressed by the people in
a referendum held on Sep. 18, 1991. The Assembly (parliament) was
elected in November of 1990, and a new constitution was promulgated
and accepted a year later.
So why is the European Council unwilling to recognize Macedonia's
independence? The reason given is that Greece does not like the name
"Macedonia," and this could be a cause for future conflict In the
interim, the door is left wide open for Serbian aggression on the
grounds that Macedonia is not a republic, but an integral part of
Yugoslavia. I expect Macedonia to suffer the fate of Croatia and
Bosnia-Herzegovina, with the tacit approval of the United States,
Britain and France. President Mitterand of France is determined to
play a major role in Yugoslavia, even though he is a lame-duck
Thus the stage is set for ethnic cleansing in Macedonia, but this
time it will escalate and spread to Albania and Hungary, invoking
a strong possibility that Russia might step in which would mean the
start of a major European war into which the United States will be
dragged. Our forces will carry the main burden in
men, equipment and financial costs.
This must not be allowed to happen. The American people must somehow
be awakened to the diplomacy by deception which is going on, in
spite of which the deception of the media, has given their full
voice of support. There are many other alternatives that can be used
to stop the war. Such measures were used successfully to topple the
Shah of Iran, put severe pressure on South Africa, and destroy Iraq
after the shooting had ended.
One principal weapon in the hands of the United States and Britain
is financial control. Within a matter of days the Serbians could be
forced to halt their aggression by placing a ban on trading in
Yugoslavian currency, by freezing all Yugoslavian funds, wherever
they are found and by imposing severe penalties (with teeth in them)
for any nation trading with Serbian Yugoslavia. These measures,
stringently applied, will do far more than any ground forces can
do, and can be quickly implemented. Under no circumstances should
the United States commit ground forces to the Balkans, as this would
herald the start of a major European war.
Coupled with these financial and economic measures, the United
States should give Serbia a three day period to remove its heavy
artillery and mortars, after which time the United States, upon
approval of Congress, should send in fighter-bombers, or
retro-fitted cruise missiles to knock out Serbian gun emplacements.
The lame excuse that our pilots will not be able to find their
targets does our armed services a great disservice. Given the high
state of technological advances, especially in infra-red and laser
imagery, there is no doubt that our pilots could find their targets
in almost any kind of weather, day or night. The only thing that is
stopping this kind of action is the unwillingness of Washington to
act against the interests of Great Britain. The use of retro-fitted
cruise missiles would also eliminate the possibilities of any U.S.
casualties in the air.
defense intelligence experts say that it would take a force of 35,000
to 40,000 soldiers to end Serbian aggression. This is an absolute
understatement designed to deceive the American people, who might be
willing to consent to such a number of troops, but would balk at a
larger force. The grand plan is to get our ground troops involved,
either in Bosnia or (most likely) in Macedonia.
When the timing is
right, we will be told that our ground forces are in danger of being
overrun, and that another 50,000 troops are needed. On the face of
it, who among us would say "no more troops, enough is enough." In
this manner will the war be escalated. Now is the time to say "NO"
to ground forces, and "YES" to air or cruise missile strikes to take
out Serbian heavy artillery and mortars.
Such action will foil the grand design of British strategists who
have long planned to keep Europe in subjugation — economic and
— using the political and military wings of NATO. There is no longer
any need for deception once the game plan is known. It is a matter
of putting a bold face on what has to be done. The clear intent of
Washington and London is to force the New World Order on Europe,
using the Serbians as surrogate terrorists to show other nations
that NATO protection is still a vital necessity.
New World Order proponents are trying to establish is that
there is a long-term trend toward anarchy when nationalist interests
dominate. The continuing fragmentation of Europe, according to the IRPC 1972-Bellagio plan, was to show that peoples living together,
whether in a majority or a minority, will always have differences
and seek to end their differences in violent conflict Thus it is
reasoned, the protection of a non-nationalist New World Order
government is absolutely necessary, and indeed desirable.
A balance of power between nations, say the NWO strategists, won't
solve the problem, because nations will always be suspicious of each
other, fearing the one is trying to secure an advantage over the
other. An example of this can be seen in relations between Japan and
the United States which have deteriorated sharply over the past five
years. A New World Order-One World Government will take care of the
tensions and make them vanish, because the root cause of the problem
is nationalist rivalry which would be removed.
This idealistic sham proposed by the New World Order will of involve
mass transfers of large population groups, which, we are told will
not he accompanied by bloodshed.
"You have seen what happened in
Yugoslavia," the NWO strategists will say, "surely it is better to
accomplish such transfers peacefully?"
They might point to the
peaceful transfers of Hindus and Moslems and the Greeks and Turks;
the latter at the end of the First World War. The truth is very
different; millions of Hindus and Muslims died as did thousands of
Greeks and Turks in these "peaceful" transfers.
"Perhaps" the NWO planners will say, "but the real benefit will come
from a turning away from global politics."
In support of their
theory, they point to the horrors of Yugoslavia, which they will
promise, could never be repeated in a New World Order-One World
Government They point to Europe's inability to bring about a
cessation of hostilities in Yugoslavia, promising that under a One
World Government, such conflicts would not begin. If by some chance
they did, they would be quickly smothered. Europe's gross failure to
prevent the Yugoslavian conflict will be held up as a model of how
the world should not be allowed to run its affairs in the future.
Under these circumstances, the collapse of Europe into a major war
would be a big plus for the New World Order-One World Government.
The French rushed to embrace Woodrow Wilson as a peacemaker and a
savior when he arrived in Paris with his peace plan, and the
deception is about to be duplicated. European nations and America
will probably rush to embrace the New World Order-One World
Government as the only hope for eternal peace.
Like Wilson's 14-point peace plan, what each of the nations will get
is everlasting slavery and barbarity never before seen on earth. The
Yugoslavian tragedy is a created tragedy, with much wider goals in
the overall strategy. The brutality of the Serbians is all to the
good, since daily it causes fear among the nations of Europe that
they might be next, and when the moment arrives, they will have been
sufficiently "softened up" to embrace their future slave-masters with
After vacillating for months, President Clinton promised to arm
Bosnian Muslims. There were cries of outrage from London. With a
single voice, the plan was denounced by Lord Owen, Lord Carrington
and Cyrus Vance.
My intelligence source said the message received by
Clinton from these worthies was that it,
"would be unwise to arm the
Bosnian Muslims, as this would only tend to increase the level of
violence that would block a peaceful settlement on which we are
As a result of this unseemly pressure on U.S. foreign policy,
Clinton delayed the plan to help the Muslims defend themselves, a
delay which will make it easier for the Serbian aggressors to go on
murdering and land-grabbing. This is what "our" sovereign
independent nation has come down to; we bow the knee to every demand
that comes from the Committee of 300.
We do not know as yet which of the
Black Nobility is controlling the
Serbians, but it is a foregone conclusion that there is involvement
by some of their top members. Lebanon is a good example of things to
come in Bosnia, Croatia and Slovenia. The "civil war" in Lebanon was
set in motion and controlled by Black Nobility members Prince
Johannes von Thurn und Taxis, Lord Harlech (David Ormsby Gore) and
Lord Carrington, acting in conjunction with Alexander Haig, Julian
Amery, Henry Kissinger, Sir Edmund Peck, Nicholas Elliot, (MI6
station chief for the Middle East), Rupert Murdoch and Charles
Douglas Home, among others.
This crime against Lebanon was characterized by the news media as
civil war when it was nothing of the kind. The murderous Serbian
onslaught against its neighbors is portrayed in the same way. Only
this time the conspirators are being considerably more careful in
covering their tracks in view of the way they were followed in
Lebanon, which led to their exposure by myself and one other writer.
Once I have the names of the behind-the-scenes controllers in
Serbia, I will not hesitate to expose them.
As in Lebanon, the plan is to carve up the Balkans into a number of
small, weak autonomous states which will not be able to offer any
resistance to the plans of the New World Order-One World Government.
If American and allied ground troops are sent to Bosnia and
Macedonia, they will perform in the manner of the Allied Expeditionary Force which landed in Murmansk during the closing days of
the First World War.
The deviousness of Lawrence Eagleburger and Brent Scowcroft
companion in Yugoslavian business enterprises must be exposed, and
the importance of Milosevic's Washington connections cannot be over
The people of Slovenia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Macedonia
will not receive any help from the world's only superpower, con
trolled like a wimp by the Committee of 300 and its foreign affairs
the Royal Institute of
Back to Contents