“I investigated the Department of Defense's germ warfare appropriations
request and learned that the option to develop synthetic biological agents
bioweapons as alternatives to nuclear weapons came from Dr. Henry Kissinger,
who was gradually placed in his position of authority as National Security
Advisor under Richard Nixon, the most powerful man in government, by Nelson
Rockefeller and his affiliates at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Moreover, I traced where the money went. It went, in fact, to a firm called
Litton Bionetics, a subsidiary of the mega-military contractor Litton
Industries, whose President, Roy Ash, was being considered as an alternate
to Henry Kissinger for the National Security Advisor post. Instead, Roy Ash
became Richard Nixon’s chairman of the Presidents Advisory Council on
Executive Organizations, and Assistant to the President of the United
And Litton Industries was given over $5 billion in military
contracts during the first term of the Nixon administration, $10 million of
which went towards the development of AIDSlike viruses.”
Dr. Len Horowitz in
a speech before the Citizens Against Legal Loopholes Rally, The Capitol
During his speech at the Capitol Mall and in his book “Emerging Viruses:
AIDS and Ebola”, Harvard graduate, Dr. Len Horowitz exposed how Henry
Kissinger, the Rockefellers, and other
NWO minions funded and created AIDS,
Ebola, and other viruses as bioweapons to suit their depopulation agenda.
“You will learn that Dr. Robert Gallo, the famous NCI molecular biologist,
pardoned by President Clinton last year for scientific fraud and misconduct,
and credited with the discovery of the AIDS virus, set about to develop
immune system ravaging, AIDS-like viruses, along with other Litton Bionetics
You will learn that they took monkey viruses that were humanly
benign, recombined them with DNA, RNA, and enzymes from other animal viruses
that caused leukemias, lymphomas, and sarcomas, and then to get them to jump
species, they cultured these new mutant viruses in human white blood cells
in some studies, and human fetal tissue cells in other studies, to produce
immune system destroying, cancer causing viruses that could enter humans and
produce virtually identical effects to what the AIDS virus is currently
doing in people around the world …
In the end, the research question I
asked, ‘Did these viruses, AIDS and Ebola, evolve naturally, were they
accidentally produced, or were they intentionally created and deployed?’ I
conclude, unquestionably, they are not natural.
I leave you the reader, and
concerned citizens of America and the world, to decide whether it was a
horrible accident or treacherous covert population control experiment.”
Len Horowitz in a speech before the Citizens Against Legal Loopholes Rally,
The Capitol Mall, 1996
“I suddenly realized how easy it was to access information I assumed would
be classified. I selected and then output the information to the printer.
The hardcopy included Soviet, Caribbean, and Cuban International Affairs
references. ‘Belitskiy on How, Where AIDS Virus Originated,’ read one title.
It documented a Moscow World Service broadcast in English. Another,
‘Commentary Accuses U.S. of Developing AIDS Virus,’ was broadcast by the
Havana International Service. A third in the
Caribbean press was tagged ‘German Claims AIDS Created by Pentagon.’ Moments
later, the BPL librarian returned with the Rockefeller Commission report
about the CIA.
Before he left, I asked how I might locate the documents I
had just learned about. He told me they were on microfilm two floors up.
Within a couple of hours, I had retrieved and read them all. Apparently,
several researchers throughout the world Dr. John Seale from London, Dr.
Manuel Servin in Mexico, and Dr. Jacobo Segal from Berlin had alleged what
The Russian report even cited a West German company named OTRAG for having conducted green monkey virus experiments in Zaire that had
allegedly led to the development of ‘a mutant virus that would be a human
Dr. Len Horowitz, “Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola” (61)
Dr. Robert Strecker was one of the first to publish peer reviewed work
regarding the origin of the AIDS virus.
He found that there are no genetic
markers in the AIDS virus typical of the primate, and that it simply cannot
thrive in monkeys. He found that AIDS was nonexistent in Africa before 1975
and yet supposedly resulted from a 1940s monkey bite. Even if it had, he
showed how the resulting epidemic would have occurred in the 1960s, not the
late 70s. Also if green monkeys were responsible for AIDS, the Pygmies of
rural Africa should have many more AIDS cases than the urban populations,
but the opposite is true.
Strecker filed a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain documents
showing that the US Department of Defense appropriated $10 million in 1969
to studying immune system destroying agents to be used for germ warfare. It
was just shortly after this that the World Health Organization (WHO) began
experimenting with a lymphotrophic virus, produced in cows, to use on
They found, as Strecker did, that AIDS thrives in cows and cow
carcasses and Bovine Lymphotrophic Virus (BLV) is very similar to HIV.
“Literature provided by The Strecker Groups urged readers to:
UP! In 1969 … [the] United States Defense Department requested and got $10
million to make the AIDS virus in labs as a political/ethnic weapon to be
used mainly against Blacks. The feasibility program and labs were to have
been completed by 19741975; the virus between 19741979.
The World Health
Organization started to inject AIDS-laced smallpox vaccine into over 100
million Africans (population reduction) in 1977. And over 2000 young white
male homosexuals (Trojan horse) in 1978 with the hepatitis B vaccine through
the Centers for Disease Control/New York Blood Center.’
Collin, in his
‘Strecker remarks that it would be relatively easy to implant
such viruses in the cow carcasses used to produce the smallpox vaccine. When
the smallpox vaccine sera were recovered from the animal carcasses, animal-lymphotrophic viruses could be carried or mutated or incorporated in
the vaccine … the epidemiology of multiple ‘contaminated’ smallpox vaccines
given in the early 1970s would provide exactly the right timetable for such
a widespread AIDS epidemic in Africa today.'"
Dr. Len Horowitz, “Emerging
Viruses: AIDS and Ebola” (17)
The original story propagated by the mass media was that AIDS was introduced
to the human population by African green monkeys. Supposedly an African was
bitten or had sex with a monkey, then brought it into the US gay population.
In an interview with Robert Strecker, Len Horowitz asked,
“But what about
the green monkey theory the theory that a green monkey bit an African or
someone had sex with an ape?”
To which Dr. Strecker replied,
nonsense... Green monkeys are about the size of chickens. So the idea of
a human having sex with a female monkey the size of a chicken is, of course,
absurd. In addition, the theory that a transmission occurred through biting,
of course, is always said to be close to impossible. If you look at the CDC
and everybody else, they say that biting is not an easy way to spread these
diseases except in the case of the purported green monkey which is suddenly
the way it was spread.” (98)
In 1977 WHO launched a major smallpox vaccine campaign in Africa which began
the rapid spread of AIDS there.
Then in 1978 the Center for Disease Control
(CDC) targeted 2000 gay men, ones who specifically had multiple sexual
partners, and gave them laced hepatitis B vaccines. The shots, manufactured
by Merck, were administered in New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, St.
Louis, Houston, and Chicago the same 6 US cities with the highest incidence
rates and death rates from AIDS.
Continuing with Dr. Horowitz and Dr. Strecker’s interview, they shed some
light on the motive behind this scam.
Strecker posits that the reason for
intentionally infecting gays was because little would be done about it:
you look in the world, what percentage of the world's AIDS cases are
heterosexuals? Over 90 percent … It's only in this country that you have
this strange, unexplained predominance of homosexuals … Just think about
this. Suppose you put this virus in the heterosexuals or kids. What kind of
response would have occurred compared to the response that did occur?”
Beyond all this, it has been repeatedly shown that
1) HIV does not even
lead to AIDS,
2) AIDS is actually a forced amalgamation of 30 different
immune ailments into one misnomer,
3) The drug “AZT” administered to
HIV/AIDS patients actually further suppresses the immune system!
“In the case of AIDS, I showed that HIV was never proved to cause anything.
I also showed that AIDS was not one thing. AIDS was in truth a variety of
states of immune suppression brought about, in different groups and,
ultimately, different individuals by a large number of DIFFERENT causes …
this research you are about to read, which took place between 1986 and 1988,
I also realized that AIDS was a perfect cover story for a covert targeting
of populations, from gay men in NYC to Africans in Uganda. Because, if you
labeled them with AIDS, already a kind of hypnotic death sentence, and then
you treated them with highly toxic drugs like AZT, and you also, in effect,
concealed what was really making them sick, you had DEPOPULATION ON THE
Jon Rappoport, “AIDS Inc. Scandal of the Century” (1)
A colleague of Robert Gallo, the AIDS “discoverer,” molecular biologist
Peter Duesberg, has a very different perspective from his associates.
Spin Magazine January 1988, Duesberg told reporter Celia Farber that,
"Scientists researching AIDS are much less inclined to ask scrutinizing
questions about the etiology (cause) of AIDS when they have invested huge
sums of money in companies that make money on the hypothesis that HIV is the
William Haseltine and Max Essex, for example, who are two of the
top five AIDS researchers in the country, have millions in stocks in a
company they founded that has developed and will sell AIDS kits that test
for HIV. How could they be objective? Gallo stands to make a lot of money
from patent rights on the virus. His entire reputation depends on this
virus. If HIV is not the cause of AIDS, there's nothing left for Gallo."
In an interview with author Jon Rappoport, Peter Duesberg continued
describing the facts of life in medical research:
“You have to be at NIH to
see how they think. They're very, very concerned with the next research
step. The step that comes after what they've just discovered. You could
remind them that the kind of virus they're studying, HIV, just doesn't
really qualify to cause a disease like AIDS, and they would understand what
you were saying, and they might even agree with you, as far as general
principles were concerned.
But then they'd turn around and go right back to
working on what they were doing before they talked to you … It's very hard
to talk to a person who has a contract with a drug company in his pocket.
How do you know that he's telling you the truth? Times have changed. This is
high stakes science, financially.” (4041)
“I continued to find chemicals that could produce AIDS symptoms. But I also
came across other factors which could cause these symptoms. Like chemicals,
they had nothing to do with the fabled HIV virus. The most important one was
starvation, long-term chronic malnutrition.
It can occur on one level among
junkies, it can occur on an entirely different scale among people of the
Third World. Malnutrition is recognized as the single largest source of
immune suppression in the world. The current definitions of AIDS in the Third
World now accept, by and large, three symptoms as central to AIDS:
weight loss of 10% or more (wasting away), chronic diarrhea, and chronic
These are also signs of chronic malnutrition. Diarrhea, through
bringing on severe dehydration, is traditionally one of three largest
killers in the world. This is nothing new.
The reason these three symptoms
are being used as frontline indicators of AIDS involves widespread lack of
lab testing facilities in Third World countries. Doctors are meant to use
these indicators to do fast, on-the-spot diagnoses of AIDS. In such a
situation, numbers of AIDS cases will skyrocket, and a hidden equality will
be established between AIDS and hunger.
But the ‘disease’ is hunger, not
Jon Rappoport, “AIDS Inc. Scandal of the Century” (1718)
upon millions of Africans have been and continue being misdiagnosed and
given AZT when they need food.
On top of this, most of the hunger and
poverty in Africa today was stirred up and created by western nations.
Hunger and poverty are not natural states of being, even for so-called “third
world” nations. In fact when first world charity organizations “help” poorer
countries with food and medication, the long-term result always hurts the
populations and helps western corporate/pharmacratic imperialism.
donations have eventual damaging effects. Farmers and others essential to
local economies find it easier to stand in lines getting free food handed to
them than it is to work the land.
That is until the donations stop coming in
or move to a different location; by that time the villagers are dependent on
their regular food deliveries, local power structures change to reflect
this, and food/food distribution is used as a weapon by western power
“The truth is, AIDS is not a single illness, it is an international
operation, a business, a bureaucracy. It is, in the Third World, a way of
substituting harmful medical drugs for what is needed: food. With AIDS, an
attempt is being made to reduce varieties of suffering and political
conflict and starvation and chemical abuse to a single entity.
viral entity, HIV, is sensational and frightening, it satisfies the desire
not to think, not to learn, not to find out what is happening in a world of
troubles. It is also easier to dump corrosive medical drugs and pesticides
on the Third World than to face up to their widening toxic effect on people.
Easier to call their symptoms AIDS.
What happens when you try to paint a
portrait of an area said to have AIDS, and you find, instead, a combination
of drugs, pesticides, starvation, older diseases, and other environmental
factors, all capable of causing immunosuppressant, all capable of producing
the symptoms of what is called AIDS?
What happens is, if you want to satisfy
your medical peers, if you want to win research grant monies, you overlook
the anomalies and say it's all AIDS. If you don't, you admit the picture is
diverse and confused. You face facts. You lose grants.”
Jon Rappoport, “AIDS
Inc. Scandal of the Century” (1920)
AZT, the HIV/AIDS medication, was approved by the FDA in record time,
granted a treatment/recommendation in less than five days and full
pharmaceutical licensing in less than six months.
AZT specifically damages
bone marrow, the site where raw materials for immune cells are manufactured.
Thus they are prescribing an immune suppressant to treat immune system
problems. Essentially, if you didn’t have AIDS before taking AZT, you’re
going to have it shortly thereafter.
In his interview with Jon Rappoport, Peter Duesberg said AZT,
“is hell for
the bone marrow... It kills normal cells quite, quite extensively ... AZT is
a poison. It is cytotoxic. I think that giving it to people with AIDS is
highly irresponsible... the drug is only going to hurt you … And now they
are giving it to people with no symptoms. It's supposed to prevent HIV from
replicating, yet they can find no evidence that HIV is replicating in the
first place.” (423)
“Kary Mullis, the winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry for his invention
of the PCR process that amplifies gene-fragments has come to Duesberg's
defense. Mullis insists that there is not one paper in the literature that
proves HIV causes AIDS.
He derides those researchers who unthinkingly accept
the HIV hypothesis Another Nobel winner, Wally Gilbert, who teaches at
Harvard, has spoken in more muted tones about problems with the HIV
hypothesis, as has Harry Rubin, a godfather of modern viral research, who
teaches at UC Berkeley along with Duesberg. Richard Strohman, a cell
biologist at Berkeley, has voiced objections to the HIV model as well.
are many obvious objections, on scientific grounds, to HIV as the cause of
AIDS. The traditional method of assigning a germ as the cause of a disease,
called Koch's Postulates, has failed to make anything of HIV. Many people
diagnosed with AIDS do not show HIV present in their bodies. No one can find
a convincing description, after 17 years, of how HIV destroys immune cells.
And so on.
Yet the press continues to parrot the party line, and governments
all over the world support HIV as the cause of AIDS with billions of
Jon Rappoport, “AIDS Inc. Scandal of the Century”
Back to Contents
Back to AIDS - Man-Made / SIDA - Hecho Por El Hombre