from O'Brien'sExtraterrestrials Website

Several years ago I mentally created a "Faraday Cage" to shield a man from mental control by the Anunnaki evil space beings. It worked and started a war between them and warrior angels.


After reading this article, I mentally created a skin-tight Faraday cage around all animal life forms including humans, designed to short out all radiation (as wind-driven rain drops are blocked by the screen in a screen door.) I am being told that it is working.


Then I did a healing mantra to heal all the damage done by radiation to the organs in all animal life forms. I also created Faraday cages around all active and future active bee hives I would like to hear from a bee keeper to confirm if the bees are coming back. My URL is My E-mail address is

I read in A COURSE IN MIRACLES that there is no degree of difficulty in miracles. I believe I made two miracles happen this morning. I wrote an E-mail letter to the woman who first had asked for help to check with her Guru to see if this story is true, and if true, I would publish it.


She wrote back that he said it was true, and she said to "Go for it", so here it is.

(The following two letters are a follow-up substantiating the efficacy of the Faraday Cages)

----- Original Message -----

From: Bellringer

To: jwob

Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:44 AM

Subject: Re: Faraday Cages

FROM: Patrick H. Bellringer

TO: John OBrien

DATE: June 28, 2007



Dear John OBrien:

Thank you for your letter and your wise actions to stop the harm being done to humans by cell phone technology today. Indeed, miracles have no degree of difficulty. Miracles happen based upon your belief in the power of your God Spirit within, that power of Creation, which all souled beings possess.


Your belief "that it would work" has made it happen, and the harmful effects of cell phone technology has been neutralized on Earth Shan. In your mind creation did you make this protection both complete and permanent, and inclusive of all life forms on our planet? (YES) Did you, also, correct the damage already done by cell phone technology? (YES)


My reading is that your "work" has been most effective in stopping any further harmful effects of cell phone technology, and that the Darkside is most unhappy with you. So, my brother, ask for Divine Protection, both complete and permanent, and we shall do the same for you.

We honor you for your faith and wisdom.
In Love and Light,



Dear Mr Bellringer
You are right. The dark side has been after me long after they were supposedly banished from Lebanon. I have been "uncreating" their dark bodies, giving their spirits the gift of unconditional love and sending them back to "Source" where they can be reincarnated with a running start.

Then in desperation they started calling for help. The first answer was 15,000 space ships that came from the DAL (Dark And Light) Universe. I got rid of the dark occupants the same way, and found that the space ships and mind-controlled crew were Pleiadian. So I had 15,000 operational space-energy powered ships, and their thankful crew on my hands.

I had been making a deal with the Pleiadeans to temporarily furnish the Airlines with shuttle craft while we created manufacturing plants to make our own. But now we didn't have to. In the meantime the DAL universe had become the dAL Universe, with fewer d's.

But the remaining dark side was not satisfied. Two more dark warrior nations sent about 15,000 ships each from the Omniuniverse, (apparently competition caused them to have equal numbers). The warrior occupants (I don't know from where) were dispatched the same way, and I GOT LEFT WITH ABOUT 45,000 SPACE SHIPS. I have turned them all over to the Pleiadeans.


Maybe we will see them in the mass fly-by when it occurs. In the mean time, I have interested FED-EX in trying 10 of them. They are large enough to beam up and down their standard size bulk shipping containers. My guides tell me that they are starting to use them on a trial basis and they are delighted with them. The latest word is they have been given a total of 1,000 space ships, and parking their cargo planes.


Patrick: I got a message that most of the dark entities in the dAL Universe were committing suicide, (MOSTLY WOMAN AND CHILDREN, they felt they were unprotected with all their space ships and warriors gone and they were long overdue to disappear anyway in this reality) So I did them a favor and uncreated the spiritually dark bodies of the whole race, if it was for the greatest good.


I gave their spirits the gift of Unconditional Love and returned them to Source. Now I understand there is a grand reunion taking place with families re-uniting. I imagine the families will reincarnate into the same family on a different planet and try to get it right this time.


What do you get?


John O'Brien


(Back to original article)
May 02, 2007


In 2002, Gro Harlem Brundtland, then head of the World Health Organization (WHO), told a Norwegian journalist that cell phones were banned from her office in Geneva because she personally becomes ill if a cell phone is brought within about four meters (13 feet) of her.


Mrs. Brundtland is a medical doctor and former Prime Minister of Norway. This sensational news, published March 9, 2002 in Dagbladet, was ignored by every other newspaper in the world. The following week Michael Repacholi, her subordinate in charge of the International EMF (electromagnetic field) Project, responded with a public statement belittling his boss’s concerns.


Five months later, for reasons that many suspect were related to these circumstances, Mrs. Brundtland announced she would step down from her leadership post at the WHO after just one term.

Nothing could better illustrate our collective schizophrenia when it comes to thinking about electromagnetic radiation. We respond to those who are worried about its dangers - hence the International EMF Project - but we ignore and marginalize those, like Mrs. Brundtland, who have already succumbed to its effects.

As a consultant on the health effects of wireless technology, I receive calls that can be broadly divided into two main groups:

  • those from people who are merely worried, whom I will call A

  • those from people who are already sick, whom I will call B

I sometimes wish I could arrange a large conference call and have the two groups talk to each other - there needs to be more mutual understanding so that we are all trying to solve the same problems.


Caller A, worried, commonly asks what kind of shield to buy for his cell phone or what kind of headset to wear with it. Sometimes he wants to know what is a safe distance to live from a cell tower.


Caller B, sick, wants to know what kind of shielding to put on her house, what kind of medical treatment to get, or, increasingly often, what part of the country she could move to to escape the radiation to save her life.

The following is designed as a sort of a primer: first, to help everybody get more or less on the same page, and second, to clear up some of the confusions so that we can make rational decisions toward a healthier world.



The most basic fact about cell phones and cell towers is that they emit microwave radiation; so do Wi-Fi (wireless Internet) antennas, wireless computers, cordless (portable) phones and their base units, and all other wireless devices. If it’s a communication device and it’s not attached to the wall by a wire, it’s emitting radiation.


Most Wi-Fi systems and some cordless phones operate at the exact same frequency as a microwave oven, while other devices use a different frequency. Wi-Fi is always on and always radiating. The base units of most cordless phones are always radiating, even when no one is using the phone. A cell phone that is on but not in use is also radiating. And, needless to say, cell towers are always radiating.

Why is this a problem, you might ask? Scientists usually divide the electromagnetic spectrum into “ionizing” and “non-ionizing.”

  • Ionizing radiation, which includes x-rays and atomic radiation, causes cancer

  • Non-ionizing radiation, which includes microwave radiation, is supposed to be safe

This distinction always reminded me of the propaganda in George Orwell’s Animal Farm:

“Four legs good, two legs bad.”

“Non-ionizing good, ionizing bad” is as little to be trusted.

An astronomer once quipped that if Neil Armstrong had taken a cell phone to the Moon in 1969, it would have appeared to be the third most powerful source of microwave radiation in the universe, next only to the Sun and the Milky Way.


He was right.


Life evolved with negligible levels of microwave radiation. An increasing number of scientists speculate that our own cells, in fact, use the microwave spectrum to communicate with one another, like children whispering in the dark, and that cell phones, like jackhammers, interfere with their signaling. In any case, it is a fact that we are all being bombarded, day in and day out, whether we use a cell phone or not, by an amount of microwave radiation that is some ten million times as strong as the average natural background.


And it is also a fact that most of this radiation is due to technology that has been developed since the 1970s.

As far as cell phones themselves are concerned, if you put one up to your head you are damaging your brain in a number of different ways. First, think of a microwave oven. A cell phone, like a microwave oven and unlike a hot shower, heats you from the inside out, not from the outside in. And there are no sensory nerve endings in the brain to warn you of a rise in temperature because we did not evolve with microwave radiation, and this never happens in nature.


Worse, the structure of the head and brain is so complex and non-uniform that “hot spots” are produced, where heating can be tens or hundreds of times what it is nearby. Hot spots can occur both close to the surface of the skull and deep within the brain, and also on a molecular level.

Cell phones are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission, and you can find, in the packaging of most new phones, a number called the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), which is supposed to indicate the rate at which energy is absorbed by the brain from that particular model. One problem, however, is the arbitrary assumption, upon which the FCC’s regulations are based, that the brain can safely dissipate added heat at a rate of up to 1° C per hour.


Compounding this is the scandalous procedure used to demonstrate compliance with these limits and give each cell phone its SAR rating. The standard way to measure SAR is on a “phantom” consisting, incredibly, of a homogenous fluid encased in Plexiglas in the shape of a head. Presto, no hot spots! But in reality, people who use cell phones for hours per day are chronically heating places in their brain.


The FCC’s safety standard, by the way, was developed by electrical engineers, not doctors.


Blood-Brain Barrier

The second effect that I want to focus on, which has been proven in the laboratory, should by itself have been enough to shut down this industry and should be enough to scare away anyone from ever using a cell phone again. I call it the “smoking gun” of cell phone experiments. Like most biological effects of microwave radiation, this has nothing to do with heating.

The brain is protected by tight junctions between adjacent cells of capillary walls, the so-called blood-brain barrier, which, like a border patrol, lets nutrients pass through from the blood to the brain, but keeps toxic substances out. Since 1988, researchers in the laboratory of a Swedish neurosurgeon, Leif Salford, have been running variations on this simple experiment: they expose young laboratory rats to either a cell phone or other source of microwave radiation, and later they sacrifice the animals and look for albumin in their brain tissue.


Albumin is a protein that is a normal component of blood but that does not normally cross the blood-brain barrier. The presence of albumin in brain tissue is always a sign that blood vessels have been damaged and that the brain has lost some of its protection.

The implications for us?

  • two minutes on a cell phone disrupts the blood-brain barrier

  • two hours on a cell phone causes permanent brain damage

  • secondhand radiation may be almost as bad

The blood-brain barrier is the same in a rat and a human being.

These results caused enough of a commotion in Europe that in November 2003 a conference was held, sponsored by the European Union, titled “The Blood-Brain Barrier - Can It Be Influenced by RF-Field Interactions?” as if to reassure the public:

“See, we are doing something about this.”

But, predictably, nothing was done about it, as nothing has been done about it for 30 years.

America’s Allan Frey, during the 1970s, was the first of many to demonstrate that low-level microwave radiation damages the blood-brain barrier.2 Similar mechanisms protect the eye (the blood-vitreous barrier) and the fetus (the placental barrier), and the work of Frey and others indicates that microwave radiation damages those barriers also.3 The implication: No pregnant woman should ever be using a cell phone.

Dr. Salford is quite outspoken about his work. He has called the use of handheld cell phones “the largest human biological experiment ever.”


And he has publicly warned that a whole generation of cell-phone-using teenagers may suffer from mental deficits or Alzheimer’s disease by the time they reach middle age.


Radio-Wave Sickness

Unfortunately, cell phone users are not the only ones being injured, nor should we be worried only about the brain.


The following brief summary is distilled from a vast scientific literature on the effects of radio waves (a larger spectrum which includes microwaves), together with the experiences of scientists and doctors all over the world with whom I am in contact.

Organs that have been shown to be especially susceptible to radio waves include the lungs, nervous system, heart, eyes, testes and thyroid gland.


Diseases that have increased remarkably in the last couple of decades, and that there is good reason to connect with the massive increase in radiation in our environment, include:

  • asthma

  • sleep disorders

  • anxiety disorders

  • attention deficit disorder

  • autism

  • multiple sclerosis

  • ALS

  • Alzheimer’s disease

  • epilepsy

  • fibromyalgia

  • chronic fatigue syndrome

  • cataracts

  • hypothyroidism

  • diabetes

  • malignant melanoma

  • testicular cancer

  • heart attacks and strokes in young people

Radiation from microwave towers has also been associated with forest die-off, reproductive failure and population decline in many species of birds, and ill health and birth deformities in farm animals.


The literature showing biological effects of microwave radiation is truly enormous, running to tens of thousands of documents, and I am amazed that industry spokespersons are getting away with saying that wireless technology has been proved safe or - just as ridiculous - that there is no evidence of harm.

I have omitted one disease from the above list: the illness that Caller B has, and that I have. A short history is in order here.


In the 1950s and 1960s workers who built, tested and repaired radar equipment came down with this disease in large numbers.


So did operators of industrial microwave heaters and sealers. The Soviets named it, appropriately, radio wave sickness, and studied it extensively. In the West its existence was denied totally, but workers came down with it anyway. Witness congressional hearings held in 1981, chaired by then Representative Al Gore, on the health effects of radio-frequency heaters and sealers, another episode in “See, we are doing something about this,” while nothing is done.

Today, with the mass proliferation of radio towers and personal transmitters, the disease has spread like a plague into the general population. Estimates of its prevalence range up to one-third of the population, but it is rarely recognized for what it is until it has so disabled a person that he or she can no longer participate in society.


You may recognize some of its common symptoms:

  • insomnia

  • dizziness

  • nausea

  • headaches

  • fatigue

  • memory loss

  • inability to concentrate

  • depression

  • chest discomfort

  • ringing in the ears

Patients may also develop medical problems such as:

  • chronic respiratory infections

  • heart arrhythmias

  • sudden fluctuations in blood pressure

  • uncontrolled blood sugar

  • dehydration

  • seizures and internal bleeding

What makes this disease so difficult to accept, and even more difficult to cope with, is that no treatment is likely to succeed unless one can also avoid exposure to its cause - and its cause is now everywhere.


A 1998 survey by the California Department of Health Services indicated that at that time 120,000 Californians - and by implication 1 million Americans - were unable to work due to electromagnetic pollution.4 The ranks of these so-called electrically sensitive are swelling in almost every country in the world, marginalized, stigmatized and ignored.


With the level of radiation everywhere today, they almost never recover and sometimes take their own lives.

“They are acting as a warning for all of us,” says Dr. Olle Johansson of people with this illness. “It could be a major mistake to subject the entire world’s population to whole-body irradiation, 24 hours a day.”

A neuroscientist at the famous Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Dr. Johansson heads a research team that is documenting a significant and permanent worsening of the public health that began precisely when the second-generation, 1800 MHz cell phones were introduced into Sweden in late 1997.5,6


After a decade-long decline, the number of Swedish workers on sick leave began to rise in late 1997 and more than doubled during the next five years. During the same period of time, sales of antidepressant drugs also doubled. The number of traffic accidents, after declining for years, began to climb again in 1997. The number of deaths from Alzheimer’s disease, after declining for several years, rose sharply in 1999 and had nearly doubled by 2001.


This two-year delay is understandable when one considers that Alzheimer’s disease requires some time to develop.

If cell phones and cell towers are really deadly, have the radio and TV towers that we have been living with for a century been safe?


In 2002 Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson coauthored a paper titled “Cancer Trends During the 20th Century,” which examined one aspect of that question.7


They found, in the United States, Sweden and dozens of other countries, that mortality rates for skin melanoma and for bladder, prostate, colon, breast and lung cancers closely paralleled the degree of public exposure to radio waves during the past hundred years. When radio broadcasting increased in a given location, so did those forms of cancer; when it decreased, so did those forms of cancer.


And, a sensational finding: country by country - and county by county in Sweden - they found, statistically, that exposure to radio waves appears to be as big a factor in causing lung cancer as cigarette smoking!

Which brings me to address a widespread misconception.


The biggest difference between the cell towers of today and the radio towers of the past is not their safety, but their numbers. The number of ordinary radio stations in the United States today is still less than 14,000. But cell towers and Wi-Fi towers number in the hundreds of thousands, and cell phones, wireless computers, cordless telephones and two-way radios number in the hundreds of millions.


Radar facilities and emergency communication networks are also proliferating out of control. Since 1978, when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last surveyed the radio frequency environment in the United States, the average urban dweller’s exposure to radio waves has increased 1,000-fold, most of this increase occurring in just the last nine years.8


In the same period of time, radio pollution has spread from the cities to rest like a ubiquitous fog over the entire planet.

The vast human consequences of all this are being ignored. Since the late 1990s a whole new class of environmental refugees has been created right here in the United States. We have more and more people, sick, dying, seeking relief from our suffering, leaving our homes and our livelihoods, living in cars, trailers and tents in remote places.


Unlike victims of hurricanes and earthquakes, we are not the subject of any relief efforts. No one is donating money to help us, to buy us a protected refuge; no one is volunteering to forego their cell phones, their wireless computers and their cordless phones so that we can once more be their neighbors and live among them.

The worried and the sick have not yet opened their hearts to each other, but they are asking questions.

  • To answer caller A: No shield or headset will protect you from your cell or portable phone. There is no safe distance from a cell tower. If your cell phone or your wireless computer works where you live, you are being irradiated 24 hours a day.

  • To caller B: To effectively shield a house is difficult and rarely successful. There are only a few doctors in the United States attempting to treat radio wave sickness, and their success rate is poor - because there are few places left on Earth where one can go to escape this radiation and recover.

    Yes, radiation comes down from satellites, too; they are part of the problem, not the solution. There is simply no way to make wireless technology safe.

Our society has become both socially and economically dependent, in just one short decade, upon a technology that is doing tremendous damage to the fabric of our world. The more entrenched we let ourselves become in it, the more difficult it will become to change our course.


The time to extricate ourselves, both individually and collectively - difficult though it is already is - is now.



1. Leif G. Salford et al., “Nerve Cell Damage in Mammalian Brain After Exposure to Microwaves from GSM Mobile Phones,” Environmental Health Perspectives 111, no. 7 (2003): 881–883.

2. Allan H. Frey, Sondra R. Feld and Barbara Frey, “Neural Function and Behavior,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 247 (1975): 433–439.

3. Allan H. Frey, “Evolution and Results of Biological Research with Low-Intensity Nonionizing Radiation,” in Modern Bioelectricity, ed. Andrew A. Marino (New York: Dekker, 1988), 785–837, at 809–810.

4. California EMF Program, The Risk Evaluation: An Evaluation of the Possible Risks From Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMFs) From Power Lines, Internal Wiring, Electrical Occupations and Appliances (2002), app. 3.

5. Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson, “1997 - A Curious Year in Sweden,” European Journal of Cancer Prevention 13, no. 6 (2004): 535–538.

6. Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson, “Does GSM 1800 MHz Affect the Public Health in Sweden?” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop “Biological Effects of EMFs,” Kos, Greece, October 4-8, 2004, 361–364.

7. Örjan Hallberg and Olle Johansson, “Cancer Trends During the 20th Century,” Journal of Australian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine 21, no. 1 (2002): 3–8.

8. David E. Janes Jr., “Radiofrequency Environments in the United States,” in 15th IEEE Conference on Communication, Boston, MA, June 10–14, 1979, vol. 2, 31.4.1–31.4.5.