by Mike Adams
the Health Ranger
February 01, 2011
is an absolute must-read for parents everywhere. It
contains the facts about vaccines, children and immune
health that the vaccine manufacturers and government
health authorities don't want circulated.
not you choose to vaccinate yourself or your children,
you owe it to yourself to hear both side of the story
before making a decision, and this report tells you the
side of the story your doctor was never taught in
To hear it from
proponents of the vaccine industry, vaccines are based on rock-solid
science that proves them to be completely safe and widely effective.
These beliefs, however,
are not factually based on real science but rather a persistent
vaccine mythology that has been propagandized by the vaccine
industry, medical practitioners and even governments which
underwrite vaccine risks.
Today, the International Medical Council on Vaccination (www.VaccinationCouncil.org)
has released, a groundbreaking document containing the signatures of
over 80 family physicians, brain surgeons and professors of
pathology, chemistry and immunity, all of which have signed on to a
document stating, on the record, that vaccines pose a significant
risk of harm to the health of children and that there is no real
science backing the "vaccine mythology" which claims that vaccines
are somehow good for children.
This groundbreaking document is called
Vaccines - Get The Full Story.
You have permission to share this report. Please also share the
download page with others so that moms and parents can get educated
about the risks associated with vaccines and thereby protect their
children from the risk of harm caused by vaccines.
The vaccine industry's message is like a broken record: Vaccines are
"safe and effective," they say. But repeating a lie over
and over again does not magically make it true.
Any such declaration
of vaccine safety or effectiveness must be based on actual
scientific inquiry, and the real science is utterly lacking on
Did you know,
for example, that MMR and seasonal flu vaccines have never
been clinically tested against non-vaccinated individuals?
Did you also
know that even though vaccines can cause long-term damage in
children, with symptoms appearing months or even years
later, they are typically only assessed for side effects for
two or three weeks?
find in this free report
Here's some of what you'll find in this eye-opening report from the
International Medical Council on Vaccination:
A list of the
many MDs, PhDs, NDs and other medical professionals who are
signing onto this document and taking a stand to critically
question the myth that vaccines are proven to be both safe
have NEVER been proven safe or effective.
A list of some
of the serious health side effects caused by vaccines.
Why autism is
associated with vaccines.
motivation behind the pharmaceutical industry's persistent
A list of which
institutions and organizations profit from your sickness.
truth about what's used to make vaccines (aborted fetal
tissue, 59 different chemicals, DNA from diseased animals
An overview of
some of the most dangerous vaccine ingredients, including
aluminum and formaldehyde.
The truth about
conflicts of interest in the vaccine community and why
doctors profit from vaccination policies.
children have far worse health outcomes than unvaccinated
children (and why the vaccine industry refuses to test
vaccines against the long-term health outcomes of
How to opt out
of "mandatory" vaccines.
for parents about how to protect the health of your children
while saying NO to vaccines.
for learning more about the dangers of vaccines.
A list of
recommended reading materials for further education.
Download this report
right now by clicking the report cover image above.
NaturalNews is also featuring two interviews with two of
the physicians who signed this report:
We will also be featuring an
on-camera interview with Dr
Andrew Wakefield, who talks with us about the symptoms of
autism, why vaccines are potentially so dangerous to children, and
what parents can do to protect their children from vaccine dangers.
Why this is a
This report by the
International Medical Council on Vaccination is an absolute must-read for parents everywhere.
little-known facts about vaccines, children and immune health that
the vaccine manufacturers and government health authorities don't
Whether or not you choose to vaccinate yourself or
your children, you owe it to yourself to hear both side of the story
before making a decision, and this report tells you the side of the
story that your doctor probably doesn't know and your government
absolutely does not want you to hear.
That's because governments underwrite vaccine risk through their
government compensation programs.
Thus, it is in the
interests of governments that vaccines never be shown to cause harm.
vaccine industry is so desperate to silence dissent
Today, I believe the vaccine industry is crumbling.
As the truth is finally
getting out about the link between
MMR vaccines and
the deaths associated with
Gardasil, and about the horrifying
ingredients used in vaccines, more and more parents are becoming
well-informed and choosing to avoid vaccinating their children.
This is causing the vaccine industry to react with a sense of
That's why the British
Medical Journal (BMJ) has resorted to using articles written by a
blogger named Brian Deer to spread factually false accusations about
some of the top medical specialists in the world who are
legitimately questioning the safety of vaccines (such as Dr Andrew
to conventional vaccine mythology is so central to the ongoing
profitability of the
pharmaceutical industry that vaccine
manufacturers will resort to practically anything to protect their
turf and try to silence anyone who questions what can only be called
a dogmatic delusion of vaccine safety and effectiveness.
Vaccine advocates refuse to debate actual facts about vaccines.
That's because the facts, if revealed, would reveal the vaccine
industry to be based almost entirely on fraudulent science and
Those facts include:
almost never scientifically tested in randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled studies using proper
placebos such as saline solution. Instead, the industry uses
other vaccines as "placebo" in order to try to hide the harm
caused by those vaccines.
ingredients that go into vaccines are absolutely horrifying,
and they include stealth viruses that are not listed on the
label, as well as DNA taken from diseased animals such as
cows and monkeys.
used in vaccines are known neurotoxins, and they include
mercury, aluminum and formaldehyde. The use of these
chemical toxins is not even denied by the vaccine industry.
Even worse, these chemicals are injected into the body,
bypassing the digestive / liver systems that normally help
neutralize toxic substances that might be swallowed. This is
why statements from vaccine pitchmen like Dr Oz who claim
"there's more mercury in fish than vaccines" are
intellectually dishonest and misleading. People don't inject
their children with fish.
media has huge conflicts of interest in reporting on
vaccines because virtually all media outlets depend on
pharmaceutical advertising money to stay financially afloat.
This is why popular news personalities like Anderson Cooper
and George Stephanopoulos wildly discredit themselves when
they play the roles of on-air attack dogs targeting people
Andrew Wakefield. Notice how they never disclose
their own networks' financial ties to
have huge motivations to make sure MMR vaccines (and other
types of vaccines) are never shown to be harmful because
they have underwritten vaccine risk through the creation of
special funds that pay damages to vaccine victims. If the
true risks of vaccines were widely known and acknowledged,
the resulting claims from parents of children harmed by
vaccines would total in the trillions of dollars.
vaccine victims, the United States government routinely
admits that vaccines cause autism and other harmful effects
in children through its Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust
Fund, which has paid out tens of millions of dollars in
awards to parents whose children were proven to have been
harmed by vaccines.
... this story gets
much, much deeper.
The more you look at the facts, the more you
realize the vaccine industry is steeped in conflicts of interest,
quack science, profit motivations, corrupt individuals and the
complete disregard for the safety of children.
vaccine industry is,
effectively, one of the most dangerous examples of modern organized
crime. Its actions are profiteering and monopolistic, and it
maintains its power through a persisted campaign of intimidation,
censorship, financial influence and quack science.
This story is just
beginning to unfold...
vaccine industry does not want you to read this report
You will be absolutely stunned at what you learn about the risks and
dangers of vaccines, including MMR vaccines, as revealed in
This is the information the vaccine industry does not want you to
read. They don't even want doctors learning this, because the more
doctors begin to investigate this issue, the more they become
convinced that they've been lied to about the safety and
effectiveness of vaccines.
Many doctors, in fact, who used to be strong vaccine proponents are
now some of the most outspoken experts warning about the dangers of
vaccines. They are now raising critical questions about the lack of
legitimate scientific testing of vaccines, and they are realizing
that the vaccine industry is engaged in a massive smoke-and-mirrors
ploy to sell dangerous medicine that poses serious, lifelong risks
to both children and adults.
The doctors who are standing up to the vaccine industry are, of
course, subjected to the most insidious and politicized attacks by
vaccine proponents, but they are nevertheless being seen as heroes
by an increasing number of parents (moms especially) who are now
able to see through the lies of the vaccine industry.
Even parents of the children studied in the
original Lancet paper by
Dr Wakefield are strong supporters of his ethics and his research.
Here's what Julia Ahier said, on the record, about the attacks on
Wakefield by the BMJ:
"I am absolutely
convinced that the MMR triggered my son's condition, as the
first problems with pain occurred on the first evening after the
vaccination and the loss of skills happened after also he had
been gaining weight at a good rate and after the MMR he only
gained 1lb 7ozs in 9 months.
I think that Dr Wakefield has only tried to help these children
he has not done anything which we as parents did not want him to
do. The allegations were unjust because they did not arise from
anyone who had medical investigations carried out on them or
Doctor Wakefield did not recruit anyone into the study group. In
our case our son was given the original referral to Professor
Walker-Smith by another hospital and I sought a referral with Dr
Wakefield our local pediatrician requested the referral.
Dr Wakefield was the kindest most compassionate doctor who had
ever taken an interest in our child's case. He did not perform
any procedures on our child, these were done with our consent
and agreement by other doctors. None of the tests which were
performed on our child were against our wishes. There was no
display of callous behavior.
I have never had any
communication with Brian Deer nor do I ever intend to."
Where to learn
more - important websites
I really want to urge you to become a fan of Dr Gary Null who
is doing the very best investigative journalism on this topic
anywhere in the world.
"deconstruction" of the BMJ, Brian Deer and the barrage of false
claims against Wakefield stands as perhaps the single most important
investigative piece that has yet been produced on this topic.
makes the BMJ's own report by Brian Deer look like a
late-night tweet from a drunken blogger.
With his permission, we have made that audio file available:
You can follow Gary Null on
to check out
Are MMR Vaccines
Dangerous for Children?
Dr Suzanne Humphries Urges
Parents to Get Informed
Are routine vaccines dangerous for children?
Dr Suzanne Humphries, a
practicing nephrologist (kidney physician) says the vaccine industry
isn't giving people both sides of the story, and parents need to get
informed before subjecting their children to vaccines that can
potentially cause serious harm or even death.
It's all being revealed in a one-hour NaturalNews interview with Dr
In that interview, you'll hear Dr Humphries talk about:
Why she became
concerned about vaccines after noticing kidney failure in
patients who recently received vaccines.
Why vaccines are
often contaminated with unknown viral strains, and why the
vaccine industry has covered up known vaccine contamination
(and knowingly sold contaminated vaccines to be used on the
Why the entire
vaccine industry needs to be questioned, and why a new
effort is needed to scientifically assess whether vaccines
are really safe or effective.
Why the fairy
tale that "vaccines eradicated polio" is a false mythology
- here's what really happened.
"smallpox" vaccine has never been proven to be effective
against smallpox at all.
industry research is extremely flimsy and ignores rigorous
standards of scientific evidence (using improper placebos
designed to minimize the appearance of side effects, for
Why the vaccine
industry won't test vaccines versus unvaccinated children
(they're terrified of the results).
caught up in outbreaks of measles are often the very same
children who were vaccinated against measles!
Why vaccines may
actually suppress the immune system and cause increased
vulnerability to future infections.
childhood infections such as chicken pox are perfectly
natural, normal and even HEALTHY.
outlandish and unscientific behavior of the vaccine industry
is causing an erosion of credibility across all "science."
Why many of the
people engaged in pushing vaccines have financial ties to
Why the vaccine
industry is utterly unwilling to tolerate anyone asking
intelligent questions about the safety of vaccines.
Hear all this and more
in this exclusive interview with Dr Suzanne Humphries:
Dr Humphries is one of the signers of the groundbreaking new
document just released by the International Medical Council on
Vaccines - Get The Full Story.
also, that nearly all those who push vaccines are also pushers of
GMOs. Both poisons are being forced upon the world in the name of
"science," but both are actually based on extreme distortions of
science and driven by for-profit corporate agendas.
Sherri Tenpenny Warns Parents
Safety of Vaccines
February 03, 2011
Are vaccines really safe and effective?
More and more credentialed
health professionals are beginning to question that assumption, and
what they're finding out about the lack of real science behind the
assumed safety and efficacy of vaccines is actually quite shocking.
Today, Dr Sherri Tenpenny speaks out in an interview with the Health
In that interview, Dr Tenpenny says,
"It seems as though the pharmaceutical industry looks at children as
nothing more than a repository of their products, whatever those
products are... whether they are a vaccine, an artificial coloring
from the food industry, something in a pill such as a medication,
and we see these kids, they're not healthy, they're pale, they just
don't look healthy.
And then the pharmaceutical industry paints
these happy pictures that we have to keep vaccinating these kids to
keep them healthy. And the pediatricians say because these kids are
sick, we need to vaccinate them more!"
Dr Tenpenny also calls out the huge conflicts of interest across the
vaccine industry and pushers of vaccination policies, saying:
"The money isn't really to be made in the vaccine industry. The
money is made by
Big Pharma with all of the drugs that are given to
treat and address all the illnesses that are subsequent to the side
effects of the vaccines."
"If we could cut vaccination by 90 percent and get everybody's
vitamin D levels up between 60 and 80 [ng / dl], we wouldn't have
this health care problem that we have to tax everybody to death to
try to take care of people. People would be healthy."
About the underlying assumption that vaccines are a valid approach
to health, Dr Tenpenny questions that, too, saying:
"True health cannot come from a needle. Injecting people with
something to try to keep them well is a 200 year mistake."
Speaking on the executives of the vaccine companies who have
knowingly released contaminated vaccines that harmed and killed
innocent children, Dr Tenpenny says,
"Some of them will go to jail.
Because I'm sure that some of them know absolutely what's going on."
She goes on to compare the behavior of the vaccine companies to
Here's what else you'll hear about in this interview
Why parents are waking up to the truth about vaccine dangers.
Why vaccines are related to our epidemic of asthma and allergies.
Why "vaccines are the backbone of the entire pharmaceutical
industry" because they create lifelong disease requiring expensive
How vaccines are made with 63 different chemicals that may pose a
grave risk of harm to human health.
Why there's no profit to be made in keeping people healthy,
leading to the drug companies actually working to keep people stuck
in a cycle of degenerative disease.
Why infection and temporary illness is actually an important part
of boosting long-term immunity and health.
Why psychiatric drugs can cause young males to grow "man boobs."
Why there have never been any legitimate randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled studies on vaccines.
Dr Andrew Wakefield Answers Critics in Video
Says BMJ Has Been Hijacked by
In a video interview
with NaturalNews, Dr Andrew Wakefield, the doctor accused by
the British Medical Journal of falsifying the data in a study
questioning the safety of MMR vaccines, asserts that the BMJ has
been "hijacked" by a politically-motivated journalist making utterly
Dr Wakefield has been grilled in the mainstream media in a series of
interviews which largely consist of uninformed journalists like
Anderson Cooper and George Stephanopoulos hurling rapid-fire
accusations without giving Dr Wakefield an opportunity to answer any
of them. The mainstream media interviews have taken on the
resemblance of theatrical productions rather than serious
In an effort to give Dr Wakefield a fair opportunity to answer his
critics, we invited him for an interview on NaturalNews.
He graciously accepted,
and we filmed a series of three conversations (see below videos).
investigation will be forced upon them"
In the first video interview, Dr Wakefield says that BMJ is factually
incorrect in accusing Wakefield of falsifying the study data in
his 1998 paper published in The Lancet.
"[The data] were
faithfully reproduced in the Lancet paper, and they were made in
the most scrupulous, meticulous way. Those are the facts. Brian
Deer knew those facts. When he made his allegations to the BMJ,
he knew those facts.
Did he disclose them
to the BMJ? More importantly, did the BMJ, as a peer reviewed
scientific journal, did they check the facts? Because the facts
were fully available to them in the book Callous Disregard."
Dr Wakefield also
explains how this desperate move by the BMJ to attack him
has eroded the credibility of the publication:
"They have been
hijacked by a freelance journalist who is not expert in any of
these fields. They have handed over their journal to this man
and allowed him to publish knowingly false allegations, and they
have gone along with it. In my opinion, they [the BMJ] have
blown their scientific credibility.
desperation... their fundamental belief that vaccines must be
safe, [they say] please don't tell me this terrible disease has
been caused by the physician, don't tell me that.
Tell me anything but
that, and we will take any information, even information from
Brian Deer, that will convince us it's safe, and we will publish
that, because that conforms with our belief system. That makes
us feel more comfortable. That makes us feel that we, as a
profession, are not culpable in this extraordinary disorder."
In this interview, Dr
Wakefield also discusses the motivation for the BMJ to grasp at any
effort to discredit those who question the safety of vaccines:
"They are so keen to
prove me wrong, to prove the parents wrong, and to exonerate the
medical profession, their political friends, their
pharmaceutical friends, whoever it is, that they have gone ahead
in this reckless way and done this.
And now, based upon
the clear, unambiguous, historical factual records, then I can
come out and talk to you like this and say this without any fear
of retribution from the BMJ because they've got themselves into
this mess. The facts are the facts."
He goes on to say about
will be forced upon them."
Why the mainstream
media won't conduct an honest, intelligent interview with Dr
What struck me in this experience of interviewing Dr Wakefield is
that this man has deeply-held compassion for the lives of children,
and he combines that with rare courage and a commitment to real
scientific thinking that dares to ask unpopular questions in the
search for the truth.
A true scientist is one who pursues the evidence without regard to
the political climate.
Facts are stubborn things, as
famously said, and Dr Wakefield has been accused of falsifying them
simply because the facts he discovered were not to the liking of
those who run today's medical monopoly.
I see in Dr Wakefield the kind of thinker who has historically
played a key role in scientific revolutions, when one era of
outmoded "scientific thinking" was replaced with a new era of deeper
Dr Wakefield was also very polite, thoughtful and kind in our
interactions. Experiencing this myself, I find it astonishing that
people like Anderson Cooper never had the journalistic honesty to
give Dr Wakefield an opportunity to tell his story in a fair
Then again, we all probably know why
the mainstream media
isn't interested in the actual scientific facts here:
All the major
media outlets are funded in large part by the
Dr Wakefield speaks on this issue, saying:
"Will the mainstream
media now take this real story, the real facts, and actually do
their job as journalists and report the facts? Will they report
the truth? I doubt it. Why? Because they're owned. Their
salaries are paid, albeit indirectly, in large part by
And the first thing
that will happen when they try and do a story which deconstructs
these arguments, the BMJ's arguments, and actually reconstructs
them in light of the truth, [is that] there will be a call from
their advertisers, saying [no]. So what will the mainstream
media do? Will it live up to its job, its duty to the people to
report the truth, or will it show complete disinterest?
Anderson Cooper has
been presented with the same nine questions. What was your story
based upon? Show us the facts. Did you do your homework? Now are
you going to pay similar attention to these documented
historical facts? We shall see."
Watch the full interview
yourself at below video.
Remember, this is only the first in a series of three interviews
with Dr Andrew Wakefield. We intend to publish the other two
interviews (below videos.) There is much more to this
story than is being dumbed down in the conventional press - this
story may ultimately turn out to reveal the BMJ engaging in the most
colossal mistake in the history of peer-reviewed "science"
The editors of BMJ must
be sitting in a room right now, reviewing the facts of the case,
with their jaws dropping to the floor as they realize they've been
had by Brian Deer.
There were duped - exploited by an individual
with a political agenda - to engage in the printing of outright
falsehoods in the name of the British Medical Journal.
As you will see in these three interviews, the BMJ has given us a
milestone in the history of the end of the dark chapter of
publication has revealed, for the whole world to see, that the
Emperor of Vaccines wears no clothes, and that those who defend
the Emperor will stoop to any level to defend their fictions,
even at the cost of revealing their own lack of scientific
To debate with the
conclusions of a physician is one thing; to outright destroy the
career and reputation of a man engaged in what can only be called
"unpopular" but important scientific investigation is the action of
a dogmatic, unscientific institution which can tolerate no real
questions at all.
That's not science. It's dogma.
And in its desperation
to vilify Wakefield, the BMJ has proven to the whole world, once and
for all, that
the vaccine industry is so afraid of the weakness of
its position that it must resort to publishing false accusations in
the name of science in order to try to fend off real scientific
In seeking to destroy Dr Wakefield, in other words, the British
Medical Journal, we will shortly observe, has only succeeded in
destroying its own credibility.
This story continues in the weeks
and months ahead...
Dr Andrew Wakefield speaks on...
The Structure of Scientific
Vaccines, viruses and evolution
In this interview, Dr
Wakefield speaks at length about the interaction between human
beings and infectious disease.
This is perhaps the most
in-depth discussion by Dr Wakefield that has ever been captured on
camera about the long-term threat that vaccines pose to the future
Here's some of what Dr
Wakefield says about the importance of expanding our view of
infectious disease beyond the stilted, dumbed-down conceptual
framework of conventional medicine, the CDC, the WHO, etc.
I've grown to have a
huge respect for [infectious
bacteria and viruses] over the
years. We are here on the Earth now because of infection. Not in
spite of it, because of it.
Our immune system
has been fashioned, shaped, designed over millions of years,
since we first emerged from the primordial soup as single-celled
organisms to evolve a hugely complex immune system that is a
result of its interaction, its education with infectious agents.
They are the prime
factor in developing our immune responsiveness.
By going from a respiratory route of infection of a natural
virus to an injected form of infection... from going from a
different strain, a different route, a different dose of
infection and a different mean population age of exposure to
infection, so kids used to get mumps at 7 to 10 years of age,
now they get it at 18 months - when you change that subtle
ecological balance which has evolved over such a long time, it
is no wonder that you are going to have unexpected, unintended
The other thing, of course, is that we've now come to learn that
so many infections or so many infectious agents are actually
beneficial. We require them for education of our gut immune
system. The exposure of the gut, the colonization of the gut,
the gut flora very early on, is a major determiner of how our
immune system [develops.]
I've become a great respecter of infectious agents and their
ability to elude us, to cause problems that we did not expect,
and if we believe in our exquisite arrogance that we can exploit
them, manipulate them in a test tube, give them back to people
and exploit them in a way we call attenuated, then the virus
will laugh at us. It will simply laugh, because it has a
collective intelligence that will not allow that to happen.
You're fighting mutations that are collectively more
intelligent, more adaptable, and ultimately can cause what, we
don't know. But you also create a population that now becomes
dependent on vaccination. Not just the first vaccine, but the
second, the third, the fourth... it never ends.
You create a
population that is dependent on immunization.
intellectual brutality of modern medical science
In this interview, Dr Wakefield also speaks about the vaccine attack
dogs who use fear tactics to terrorize scientists into conforming to
"accepted" views on vaccines:
I talk to many
scientists, many physicians whose children are affected by
autism following vaccines who say I know there is a problem, but
we don't dare step out of line.
We look at what
happened to you, and we don't dare step out of line ...And I do
meet these people all the time, and to me that's unacceptable.
Because the future of the world depends upon the wellbeing of
[Science] has sold out to the pharmaceutical industry, and to
Medical schools are dependent upon their funding in large part
from the pharmaceutical industry, or pharmaceutical industry
influences, and this is dancing with the Devil in respect to the
way in which science should be conducted, and the influences
placed upon it.
This is what happened to me, there were constraints placed upon
my valid vaccine safety research, because in the UK, the
government had done a deal with the pharmaceutical industry that
meant the government had picked up their liability for a
knowingly dangerous Measles, Mumps, Rubella vaccine.
They licensed a
vaccine in July of 1997 which had, in that same month, been
withdrawn in Canada for safety reasons. They knew it was not
safe. It was cheaper. They put price before the wellbeing of
Now we've seen time and time again the corruption, the abuse of
science, and it's happening largely on one side of this
equation. You are told time and time again there are 14, 17, 20,
millions of papers which exonerate the vaccine, saying there's
no link between mercury
thimerosal preservative and
In fact when the
data are analyzed, when the studies are looked at
comprehensively, 74 percent of those studies' published data
support a link between mercury and autism.
And yet the public are being told, through this vast public
relations machine, that the science is over, it's ruled it out.
And when you take
the science that proposes it is ruled out and reanalyze it
correctly, which Dr Desoto did from the University of Northern
Iowa, it shows exactly the opposite effect, and the scientists
who wrote the original papers had to change their findings and
conclusions. They had not analyzed the data properly.
So science in the private interest, I'm afraid, is damaging for
And that's what
we're seeing at the moment.
The future of
human civilization is threatened by modern vaccines
In this interview, Dr Wakefield also speaks out how vaccines may one
day threaten the long-term survivability of the human race, even
while forcing the world population to become dependent on vaccines
in the mean time.
Here's what he says:
What happens to a
population that becomes dependent for its very survival on
vaccines? Who are we, and our children, and our grandchildren,
then beholden to? And are the people we are beholden to, the
pharmaceutical industry, are they actually capable of
anticipating what that bacteria or virus is going to do next?
never thought about it in the first place. So we are creating a
marketplace; we are creating a wonderful revenue model; and we
are creating a potential time bomb for the population.
You cannot sterilize the world, nor should you.
This whole notion of
the Germ Theory needs to be radically modified in light of what
we now know, so that we have scientists who acknowledge that
this fundamental and very essential ecological interaction
between man and microbe, or plant and microbe, is vital... but
you have a commercial imperative which pays no heed to that at
The dangers of
vaccines are quite real
ingredients truly dangerous to human health?
Dr Wakefield addresses
that question in great detail:
children and you're giving them ethyl mercury from day one...
indeed now in pregnant women in the influenza vaccine, and you
are potentially very likely biological, plausibly, poisoning the
immune system of those individuals, biasing it towards an immune
response that is not protective against viral infections, and
then you're giving live viruses? What is the outcome of that
going to be?
Aluminum is known to influence the immune system in the same
way. Indeed, that's why it's there [in the vaccines]. It's there
to promote an antibody response, a response which does not bias
the immune system towards protection from intracellular
organisms like viruses. You are deliberately doing it.
So when you then
give a live viral vaccine, what is the compound effect of that?
When you're giving them all at the same time, what is the
compound effect? No one knows. Why? Because no one's looking.
Why? Because no one cares enough, that's why.
Do not take these infectious agents, these known toxins for
Do not make
assumptions about them, particularly when you're using them in
combination because they will produce untoward effects that you
don't even expect, that you are not looking for, [that] you have
not got on your list of adverse reactions that are known to be
caused by this virus. You won't find them.
Because you have
changed the whole interaction between the infectious agent...
and the immune system.
That's what you've
changed, something so fundamental.
scientific truth, regardless of the personal and political costs
Ultimately, Dr Wakefield is a truly dedicated scientist who
persistently pursues the evidence without regard to any particular
political agenda or corporate agenda.
Unfortunately for Dr
Wakefield, this pursuit of scientific truth has put him in the
crosshairs of the conventional medical system, the mainstream media
and virtually the entire pseudoscientific vaccine-pushing attack
dogs; but this has not deterred Dr Wakefield from continuing to
pursue scientific answers to important questions.
And yet, Dr Wakefield has no illusions that his contributions to
these scientific revolutions in the understanding of infectious
disease and vaccines may not be recognized in his own lifetime:
If you're going to
get involved in this kind of debate, then you as the scientist
need to study the history of medicine, the history of science as
well, and understand this is the fate of many people who go out
on a limb, who make extraordinary claims. That's what's going to
You mustn't expect
to be exonerated in your lifetime... or ever.
But you must stick to the scientific principle and pursue the
hypothesis until its natural conclusion, and not abandon it
because you're put under political, financial or other
pressures, if you can.
Now, there is an
additional imperative for a physician to do it, who is looking
at these children... As long as I don't suffer from the
vainglorious belief that this is all going to be resolved in my
lifetime - I hope it is for the sake of these children - but I'm
so far beyond that notion that I need some kind of redemption
from the American Academy of Pediatrics, or The Lancet, I don't.
instruments of a state that I don't really want to be associated
with. I would like to stick to the principles of medical
science, and that's my job.
And I won't be
deterred from that.