by Dave Mihalovic
October 21, 2013
from PreventDisease Website
Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.
by Dave Mihalovic
October 21, 2013
from PreventDisease Website
They tell us chemotherapy saves lives, boosts long-term survival rates and does not damage healthy cells.
All these statements by the cancer industry are false. Poison kills indiscriminately - always has and always will. While damaging healthy cells, chemotherapy also triggers them to secrete a protein that sustains tumor growth and resistance to further treatment.
That's right... chemotherapy will
actually boost cancer growth and cancer treatment is the
leading cause of secondary cancers.
...and practically all medical research is an industry and driver of corporate profits.
The cancer industry is particularly
ironic because the products that cause many cancers are made by
divisions of the same multi-national corporations whose subsidiaries
make the scanners and equipment that is used to diagnose cancers,
the drugs used in chemotherapy and those given to prevent the cancer
There is no such thing as a drug without
a side effect.
Most chemotherapeutic agents do enter
the brain and they can directly and indirectly produce a number of
acute and delayed changes to the central nervous system. These
effects can last for years, then dissipate, or, when they occur in
young children, can ripple into adulthood.
Because these drugs damage DNA, they can cause long-term damage to the bone marrow and consequently affect long-term immunity.
With these drugs, the risk for a second cancer develops slowly over time but their diagnosis is inevitable. Studies have shown that the risk begins to rise about two years after treatment, is highest about five to 10 years after treatment.
It's the reason most chemotherapy
patients die 10-15 years after treatment.
Again, most patients that pursue radiation therapy develop secondary cancers related to treatment and not as a consequence of the original cancer. Radiation-induced cancers have exploded in the past two decades ever since radiation has proliferated as a treatment, usually secondary to chemotherapy.
Some other cancer risks are tied to radiation therapy, as well. Solid tumors can develop at or near the site of the radiation exposure even 10 or more years after the radiation therapy.
These risks seem to be greatest in certain areas of the body, such as the breast and the thyroid. In some of these cases, your age at the time of radiation treatment plays a role.
For example, younger breast cancer
patients are more likely to develop a second cancer from radiation
therapy than older breast cancer patients.
Dr. Robert Atkins, MD, of Atkins Diet fame once announced there are several cures for cancer, but there’s no money in them.
They’re natural, effective, and inexpensive, no expensive drugs are involved but they require quite a lot of self-discipline from patients. It costs millions to fund research and clinical trials needed to produce a new cancer drug that can be patented and sold.
Often these drugs create more illness. It has been said that the key to success in the health business is to pull off the trick of making people patients for life.
Consider how many people who
registered a couple of abnormal blood pressure readings have been
kept on medication until the medication killed them, when a quick
fix course of drugs supported by major changes of diet and lifestyle
would have returned their physical condition to an unmedicated
Dr. Glenn Warner, who died in 2000, was one of the most highly qualified cancer specialists in the United States. He used alternative treatments on his cancer patients with great success.
On the treatment of cancer in this country he said:
Dr. Alan C. Nixon, past president of the American Chemical Society writes,
And according to Dr. Charles Mathe, French cancer specialist,
Dr. Allen Levin stated:
In his book, The Topic of Cancer:
When the Killing Has to Stop, Dick Richards cites a
number of autopsy studies which have shown that cancer patients
actually died from conventional treatments before the tumor had a
chance to kill them.
Chemotherapy works by inhibiting reproduction of fast-dividing cells such as those found in tumors.
The scientists found that healthy cells damaged by chemotherapy secreted more of a protein called WNT16B which boosts cancer cell survival.
The protein was taken up by tumor cells neighboring the damaged cells.
In cancer treatment, tumors often respond well initially, followed by rapid regrowth and then resistance to further chemotherapy.
Rates of tumor cell reproduction have been shown to accelerate between treatments.
The researchers said they confirmed their findings with breast and ovarian cancer tumors.
Patients with incurable cancers are
promised much greater access to the latest drugs which could offer
them extra months or years of life, however many doctors have been
urged to be more cautious in offering cancer treatment to
terminally-ill patients as chemotherapy can often do more harm than
good, advice supported by Peter Nelson's study.
Cancer treatment or diagnostics is never
mentioned as a cause of any primary or secondary cancers.
an increase of 75% compared with 2008
More than half of all cancer patients
suffer significant treatment-related toxicity. Treatment can also
result in life-threatening infections or patients may simply die of
But small doses of poison are still
Conventional cancer treatment is a massive and expensive fraud - a non-treatment that sickens and kills more people than it ever "cures." It can never cure anything because it poisons the body which only causes more disease in the future.
The question [of whether or not chemotherapy really extends life, ed.] can probably no longer be answered. In clinical studies the manufacturers always compare their new drugs with older cellular poisons. There are no control groups that are given no treatment at all.
In order to be allowed onto the market,
it suffices to achieve a "statistically significant" advantage in
one small group of hand- picked test subjects vs. those treated with
some already approved cellular poison.