- In the Rense article,
Is Popular Mechanics Hiding
911 NYC Engine In Street Photo?,
the street engine was identified as a CFM56, the sole
powerplant of the Boeing 737 after the 737-200 series. HOWEVER, UA175
that was alleged to have crashed into the South Tower was a Boeing
767-200.
-
- In this screen capture from the CNN video of the
South Tower crash the engine (circled) is seen as it heads for the
intersection of Church and Murray. A flame can be seen following the
descending engine.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- This photo shows smoke still coming the rear
end.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The Standard of 9/11 videos, the Naudet brothers,
"9/11", is chuck full of clips of the white jet, the ST helicopter,
WTC demolitions, the street engine below and portrays that fateful day
as only a documentary shot inside the Towers can. A collector's item.
(http://www.amazon.com/)
-
-
-
-
- In the Rense article,
WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT
From Boeing 767,
the FBI was photographed at Church & Murray. In the hardest
hitting investigative journalism since 911, The Power Hour Radio in
their completely revamped video, 911 in Plane Site, the Director's Cut
(http://www.policestate21.com/)
reported that the FBI roped off the area and photographed the street
engine (circled).
-
-
-
-
-
- The heavily damaged engine cracked the pavement on
impact, highlighted in yellow. The Murray Street sign is circled to
verify its location.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Somebody has placed a carpenter's square in the
opening so the size is that of a CFM56. This is the definitive photo
of the street engine.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The FBI and FEMA were named as defendents along with
officials in the Federal government in the Rodriguez RICO lawsuit.
http://www.911forthetruth.com/pages/BergBlog.htm
- The court filed Answer and Brief is interesting
reading. One source claimed the street engine was buried in Fresh
Kills Landfill on Staten Island . No matter the FBI and FEMA has
photos.
-
- In the Rense article,
Missing Pentagon Jet Engine
Identified,
a JT8D engine was identified in the Pentagon crash debris.
HOWEVER, a JT8D engine is NOT the powerplant the Flight 77 Boeing 757
that is alleged to have struck the Pentagon. IN ADDITION, the alleged
Flight 93 Boeing 757 had an engine blown off that was recovered.
Anybody betting it was Boeing 757 engine? No doubt the AA11 engines
were also recovered as they weigh 5-6 tons.
-
- Karl Schwarz reported on the missing aircraft and
passengers:
-
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_government&
Number=293521058&page=&view=&sb=&o=&vc=1&t=0#Post293521058
- KS: I can answer your question, in part. Two air
traffic controllers came forward and started talking. Both of the
flights that took off that supposedly hit the World Trade Center were
actually directed to the east and they disappeared in a single sweep
of the radar out over the Atlantic.
-
-
-
-
-
- This cropped photo shows the CFM56 engine
portion.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Another engine part lying in the NYC street from the
Naudet documentary:
-
-
-
-
-
- KARL SCHWARZ has the big Pentagon picture in more
hard-hitting analysis
-
-
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/020205
Schwarz/020205schwarz.html
- (Note the html link ending.)
-
- Visit
www.karlschwarz.com for the big 9/11 picture
and more.
-
- In the hardest hitting journalism since 9/11, THE
POWER HOUR RADIO SHOW has totally revamped and added new analysis to
an earlier video. 911 IN PLANE SITE, The Director's Cut. Visit
www.policestate21.com to order. A quote from their South Tower
airliner video analysis: "...there was some sort of incendiary or
explosive that would serve as a match to ignite the enormous amount of
fuel (when the plane hit the ST.)"
HERE the full story.
-
- Craig Hill also has revamped his dynamite video,
Treason, Inc.
-
http://hillsenatenow.org/
- (Watch Video clip
Treason, Inc.)
-
|
