by Marshall Masters
from Yowusa Website
Remember that great line "Just when you think you're out,... they drag you back in...." from Godfather III? Well this saga has taken another turn and the game is afoot once again.
It is important to note that whoever posted this third message under
the YouTube screen name NibiruShock2012 was, as before - anonymous.
Therefore, until the actual person or persons who posted these
videos come forward, it is impossible to say who authored this third
"Show me the images," they demand, and with good
reason. We too have seen numerous Planet X Sun Dog photos and hoax
videos over the years. However, we do not abide the caustic,
self-righteous tone of abrasive "show me the images" debunkers,
because they always rush to judgment.
Titled Nibiru/Planet X photos taken January 2008, it has been viewed over 39,000 times as of the publication date of this article.
photos taken January 2008
update February 1 2008
photos taken January 2008
It is important to note that, absent independent confirmation, we cannot authenticate these "false color images." However, the aspects of this story that compel us to declare this a video a credible, "unofficial" leak are as follows:
Following a brief overview of the South Pole Telescope, this
introduction will briefly discuss each of these aspects.
The South Pole Telescope (SPT)
In this article, we explain why the SPT is essentially the perfect
instrument, at the perfect place and at the perfect time to observe
Planet X / Nibiru, assuming a Southerly approach to the core of our
The first of note happened to be a YouTube video titled South Pole Telescope Commute, that was posted on December 28, 2007 by researchers at the SPT.
South Pole Telescope Commute
What we found interesting about this video was the great care the
the researchers used to avoid showing us anything about this massive
telescope, which is ostensibly funded by the US government for
Ergo, we had immediate questions, such as:
Absent a second source for verification, the logical approach is to vet the information with the source. In this case, that begins with NibiruShock2012, the YouTube Director who posted it. This is when we encountered what was clearly an intelligence cover-up.
That question points us to the initial source of the leak.
NibiruShock2012, the 37-year old YouTube Poster lives in Switzerland
(a neutral country) and is the final person in this informant chain.
However, the SPT Informant is most likely an employee of the
American government with access to these images. This is the key
They use a
sloppy, agenda-driven approach. This is shown in Janice Manning's
analysis. Her analysis shows us that NibiruShock2012 is essentially
a technical illiterate, using publicly available material to
introduce the video. The debunkers neglect to take the use of
publicly available material into account.
Based on the respective efforts of the various members of this international analysis group, our initial findings are of critical import to all those with an interest in Planet X / Nibiru.
It was then posted on YouTube.
As we are unable to contact the any of the informants and cannot
independently confirm this report as verified, we can only publish
these series of articles as preliminary conclusions. As compelling
as they are, they nonetheless must be viewed as speculative at this
Nibiru/Planet X photos taken January 2008, it has
been viewed over 39,000 times as of the publication date of this
For example, we were the first to declare
APOLLO 20 Important Datas About Nibiru Approaching
a hoax video
on our new blog on January 28, 2008.
While ProjectStorm's response video was poorly executed, it offers two very valuable research findings:
Here is what ProjectStorm should have done before declaring NibiruShock2012's video a hoax.
ProjectStorm approached his or her analysis with a highly-charged agenda. He or she fully intended to discredit and humiliate NibiruShock2012 in any way possible. In the process, his or her own hubris not only proved to be his or her downfall; it also proved the exact opposite for NibiruShock2012's video.
proved that NibiruShock2012's video is not a Photoshop hoax.
The Planet X / NibiruShock2012 video evidenced three separate, distinct "author's voices" to wit:
This analysis begins with an analysis of the
SPT Informant, using
the the four time-stamped and numerically sequenced images from the
The SPT Informant
By the time that Image #4 had been captured, that camera had
captured a total between 01/01/08, 06:31 AM and 01/20/08, 21:43 PM
of 37 images of that area of space. This indicates that the SPT
Informant chose the images very carefully to obtain a well-rounded,
representative sample of four images out of those 37.
This also shows in the fact that the daily average of images for #4 tripled that of images for #3.
Here is a representative Passive Voice paragraph from the video:
Both sentences in the above paragraph are in Passive Voice. Passive
Voice is common for people who are not American but can write in
Regardless of the Writer's Voice and typos, the care and sense of urgency of the producer show in the last three CGI sentences:
The compassionate tone in this last CGI text recognizes the concern
of world governments that this will cause a panic. In essence, this
chain of informants does not see the governments as the "bad guys"
and wants the viewer to understand that. On the other hand, a
disinformation ploy would have ended on a strong conspiratorial
This one paragraph clearly shows how this concern that bonded the members of this disclosure chain.
During the analysis, co-authors Jacco van der Worp, MSc and
Benjamin Cropley often noticed that the level of expertise in astronomy was
solid with regards to the SPT Informant and less so with the Video
The author enhanced inverse variants of the four pictures from January 1, 10, 15 and 20 and laid them one upon the other to reconstruct the orbits with the center object as point of reference.
In this layered reconstruction, we used a working assumption, in
which the respective image scales were treated as identical.
Object A -Orbital Period of 22 to 25 Days
If it is correct, this object has an estimated orbital period of 21 or 22 days.
The red object in the center is a brown dwarf (dark star) with four very large satellites. In comparison to the dark star, the satellites in the cluster are not entirely spherical.
This is important because of the following three reasons why a satellite or planet does become spherical:
Upon closer inspection, after enhancing and zooming the images, we are able to get clearer images of the objects orbiting the dark star. Following are the four satellites orbiting it, zoomed in to reveal greater detail.
Planet X Satellite - Upper Left
At this point, the writer references the work of
Jacco van der Worp,
MSc of yowusa and
Andy Lloyd of darkstar1.
Unstable Satellite Orbits
Those satellites with unstable orbits will eventually do one of three things:
The imagery clearly indicates that the satellites orbiting the dark
star have not been in orbit long enough to become spherical. Notice
particularly the lower right satellite, which appears more
triangular, and the upper left satellite (more of a 'less pointy'
rugby [American football] ball shape), reminiscent of the moons of
Mars. In addition, while older satellites could be orbiting this
dark star, they do not appear in the presently available images.
Andy Lloyd's Hypothesis
Like those in the images, they would not yet be entirely spherical.
For this reason, this writer is inclined to believe that these photos are indeed real.