For some time now, the Enterprise Mission has been operating on a "working hypothesis" to the effect that this planet is in increasing danger from cometary and meteoric impactors, particularly from the bi-annual Taurid Meteor Stream. A core aspect of this model is the premise that NASA and certain "elite's" within the planetary science community have been deliberately downplaying this danger for political and possibly religious reasons.
We have suspected that there may be an "escape plan," possibly to Mars, in the event that a major catastrophe of the bolide type inflicts itself upon our world. Correspondingly, we have determined that elements within -- but outside the purview of -- the civilian government of the United States are in possession of "Hypership" technologies, AKA "Flying Saucers" of the type we have seen on the STS-48 and STS-80 Space Shuttle videos.
These types of craft, confirmed to be in
the possession of deep black organizations by Pentagon sources, are capable
of easily directing an asteroid or comet on very precise trajectories --
essentially designer meteors.
However, given that this event was noted to
coincide with a spectacular fireball in Georgia, it is possible that the
detonation of a large incoming object against such a shield could account
for the "EMP shockwave" that was detected. Given that the entry speed of
incoming meteors is generally far too slow to create enough energy to
produce such a pulse with a simple air burst, the additional energy may be
coming from this theorized shield.
One of them described the core as bright orange, with a brilliant white tail and and a second "hot gas green" tail behind the first one. Residents in Palmer, Alaska stated that the rumbling shock wave could be heard coming from the direction of Sutton, Alaska, about 10 miles to the northeast. The blast was also heard in Wasilla, Alaska and the fireball was spotted from Anchorage. There was an apparently unconnected earthquake in the area about one hour later.
The reports were alarming enough that state troopers took a helicopter up to Mount Mckinley the following day to look for an impact site.
What is interesting about the towns of Wasilla, Palmer and Sutton, is that they form a straight line which points directly to the HAARP facility a few miles north of the village of Gakona.
Whatever it was, it evidently traveled on a path directly over HAARP and detonated somewhere northeast of Sutton. Local astronomers estimated the detonation occurred "about 50 miles away" based on the fact that witnesses reported a three to four minute delay between the detonation and the sound of the blast.
We have not yet found any estimate of the objects altitude. Despite earlier reports that the object was "pumpkin sized," these same scientists have evidently now acknowledged the object must have been "larger than normal."
Map showing path of incoming fireball, probable point of detonation, and "funnel pattern" of audible shock wave.
It is important to remember that meteors travel at speeds ranging from 10 - 50 miles per second, so even though a distance of 60 miles or so from HAARP may seem like a clean miss to most of us, it would represent little more than few seconds travel time for such an object.
the imprecision of the time estimates from the visual blast to the boom
sound, and the enormity of interplanetary space and the Earth itself, this
is nothing less than a virtual direct hit.
By 7:45, the level of activity had ramped up considerably, as if something had been "switched on" and began stimulating the ionosphere.
This level remained pretty much constant at 8:15, only moments before the big blast in Alaska.
By 8:45, most of the blue is gone, at several hours. This sort of readout is exactly what we would expect to see if an ionospheric shield was suddenly turned on in antind the ionograph is returning to its level of activity prior to the Alaska blast/EMP event.
This activity slowly dissipates over the nexcipation of a "visitor," reacted to the impact of same against the shield, and then slowly resonated or "pinged" throughout the shield network for some time afterwards.
It seems more than coincidental that the most intense readout is moments after detonation. What it appears we have here is a graphical record of an active shield being struck by "incoming," and then returning back to normal levels of operation.
But wait a minute, didn't our critics say that this is all just "solar activity"? Fortunately, Steadman pulled the data charts for the time period covering the event from NOAA's Space Environment Center website.
What they show is that the night of the 8th/9th was a very quiet one.
This Satellite Environment Plot for the period of January 7th through the 10th shows that it was an exceptionally quiet period of electromagnetic solar activity. Only on one occasion did the bar graph move into the yellow range.
By contrast, a few days later a moderate-to-mild "solar storm" began and created quite a bit more activity on this same chart:
Note how the storm creates "pulses" of intense activity being registered as the yellow and red readouts on the bar chart. Other instruments recorded the increased levels of activity related to the storm as well. The GOES 8 and 10 satellites record fluctuations in the x-ray output of the sun.
They also show that the sun was quiescent on the 8th-9th but quite active in the x-ray band during the recent moderate storm.
Earlier data from the 7th-10th is in dark purple color.
The difference becomes even more obvious when we superimpose one graph over the other:
So all that remains, to put this "solar activity" argument to rest once and for all, is to check the HAARP digisonde during the January 13th-16th storm. And guess what? HAARP's digisonde seems to have been turned off during most the storm.
There are numerous blank or nearly blank readouts from the digisonde. If the only purpose of the digisonde network is to monitor the activity in the ionosphere, you would think it would be a good idea to have it turned on during the storm wouldn't you? At any rate, we were able to find some useful digisonde returns. What they show is that the instrument registers some significant activity very similar to what was recorded on the 8th-9th during the "EMP event."
Since we already know that the sun was very quiet during the January 9th,
1999 Alaskan fireball - flatly ruling out "solar activity" as the source of
the digisonde returns - what could have accounted for the sudden increase
in ionospheric activity right before the fireball exploded and right after?
Given the distance estimates, we place the location of the actual explosion right around the town of Eureka Roadhouse, actually 65 miles away. And guess what? We have another "symbolic" hit.
Just as at Turret Peak on the December 7th EMP event, it is Comet Encke, the lead object in the Taurid Meteor Stream, this time at the magical "19.5° tetrahedral altitude." So once again, we find the "NASA/Masonic/Egyptian" pattern in a place it has absolutely no business being - if this is all just a coincidence.
And again on Mars at the Viking 1 landing site we find
star Mintaka rising at 19.5° above the horizon.
Looking at the example of the December 7th, 1998 Georgia fireball, this event fits the same pattern with striking similarity. In order for us to be completely wrong about the "staged" aspects of these two events, then all three of the Alaska alignments and all six of the December 7th alignments must be mere chance.
If this seems improbable to you, let us not forget that rather large impact in Greenland on December 9th, 1997. As Hoagland laid out in "A Possible January, 1998 'Hale-Bopp Event'", there were a series of interesting coincidences around that event as well. Not only was Sirius dead on the horizon at the impact site -- again symbolic of the transition between dimensions -- but what he could not and did not know at that time was that there was a very interesting "prediction" being made in the stars over the future Alaska detonation zone.
So this "NASA/Egyptian/Masonic" pattern is hardly new and is remarkably consistent over all of the recent "meteor events." And it seems there were plans as far back as December 1997 to send this "shot across the bow" of HAARP.
The symbolic significance of these extraordinarily unlikely events requires some interpretation.
To use "hyperships" to nudge a rock on an entry trajectory directly over HAARP must have some deeper meaning in the Grand Plan, which is being slowly revealed over the course of these events. Given that HAARP has been the center of so much controversy lately, whether it is or is not a "Tesla Device," whether it can control or manipulate weather over vast distances, and its usefulness as a "scalar meteor shield," we find it far beyond the possibility of coincidence that a massive meteor would detonate practically on top of it.
The date, time and location of this event were designed to send a message, not just to the "in-crowd" this time, but to the public at large.
This shot across the bow is meant as a wake-up call, a chance for us to notice and began to demand the action that would be necessary to avoid a later catastrophe.
The significance of Encke's positioning is a strong hint that it is the Taurid stream we should be worried about. The position of Set/Mars from the perspective of Giza could be a warning that the Egyptian god of chaos and destruction is returning to the land where he once ruled with brutal impunity.
And Orion/Osiris above the "first temple" of Mars? A sign
of hope that the good god Osiris will be restored to his kingdom after the
"final war" that the ancients promise us is yet to come. All of this fits
with the scenario we first laid out in
"Oh My God!," and moves it another
We have seen indications from various quarters, the SOHO images, the statements of Father Charles Moore, the so-called third secret of Fatima and new interpretations of Nostradamus that the event will take place this year. At least two high level inside sources have also indicated as much in separate conversations with Enterprise researchers.
why, as we asked in "Oh My God!," is NASA doing virtually nothing!?
Press "F5" in your dashboard
With images of these bizarre "streaks" seemingly striking active "shields" like the ones above from Texas, numerous ground based reports of meteor strikes against these shields, hovering fireballs and inexplicable "scalar" weather, we see a compelling pattern inexorably emerging.
We believe that this "near-miss/direct-hit" over HAARP was a test of this meteor defense system, similar to what we have been observing through the last several months on the radar data and never designed to "take out" HAARP. It was done in accordance with the ritual pattern we continue to document, and with a callous disregard as to the consequences of a botched test.
If this system had failed, it is possible that some residents of Alaska would have suffered the consequences. That it was also done in plain sight over a populated area, as other tests have been, is an indication that this project is preparing for prime time. Either there is a plan to make public the existence of this system in the near future, or events are taking on a life of their own and what is happening in the skies can no longer be covered up.
This does not mean that there will not be
continuing efforts to disguise what is happening. It just means that these
efforts will eventually fail.
Whether we are ultimately
successful in this endeavor will likely depend on the support we get from
the general public.