While the evolutionists and the creationists have been battling it out through dramatic episodes of the Scopes soaps, another explanatory paradigm has been developing exponentially which subsumes, corrects, and makes obsolete, specifically relative to the human species, both of those rather primitive paradigms.
While the scientific imperialists and the religious dogmatists have thought that they owned the discussion by proprietarily boxing the argument and defining the binary options, the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin, has advanced a robust and coherent paradigm of our genesis and unique history that, if true, ----- and I am convinced that it is after working critically with it for 28 years ----- is profound, comprehensive, and fundamental enough to enable us to rewrite the entire history of our beginnings and the planet astronomically, evolutionarily, paleontologically, archaeologically and, literally, redefine ourselves as humans.
Sitchin’s thesis illuminates that antique conflict with Nobel prize quality research, renders the, by now, Monty Pythonesque arguments outmoded, subsumes and corrects creationism, redefines Darwinism as well as its latter day detractions. He has been able to do this because he reads Sumerian as well as the Semitic languages including ancient and Modern Hebrew, and is steeped in the history.
He has had the advantage of
access to the accumulated scholarship and archaeological material
from the Middle East rediscovered only in the last one hundred and
Zecharia Sitchin, one of two hundred Sumerian scholars on the planet who can read a cuneiform clay tablet like you and I can read a newspaper, has demonstrated that the Anunnaki/Nefilim (Sumerian/Hebrew: those who came down [from the heavens] ) , the transcultural “gods” known to all the ancient civilizations from the tenth planet in our solar system, Nibiru, colonized Earth 432,000 years ago and created the human species 200,000 years ago, by genetically crossing their genes with Homo Erectus.
Corroboration comes from evidence for Planet X/Nibiru from the Naval Observatory, the Infrared search by the IRAS satellite in ‘83-’84; genetically from the mitochondrial DNA "search for Eve"; anthropologically from the "out of Africa" data placing our genesis in Central Africa 200,000 years; enigmatic ooparts and close to two million pieces of artifact and documentation recovered directly from the ancient civilizations.
Our modern science has provided a means of
identifying advanced science in the ancient past previously thought
of as fantastic even for us. The advances in our scientific
discoveries in genetics, mitochondrial DNA research, space and
planetary science, archaeology, paleontology, anthropology, and
linguistics as well as even the physics of metallurgy have enabled
Sitchin to demystify the advanced technologies of the Anunnaki and
identify and explain ooparts . We have progressed from being their
slave animals to limited partnership and, since they phased off
Earth, are now phasing out of a 3000 year traumatic transition to
racial independence, a rapid metamorphic process, under the
imperative of our advanced Nefilim genetic component.
Enlil, eventually known as
of the Old Testament, maintained the position that humans were to
remain slaves, totally subservient to the Anunnaki and him
Religious ritual is the transmutation of palace servant duties. The serving of favorite roasted meats on the Anunnaki table became the offering of “burnt offerings” on the table now become an “altar”, the transportation of the Anunnaki local ruler on a dais became a procession of statues, the Anunnaki palaces became “temples”, etc.
The Anunnaki were, clearly and unambiguously, known to the humans who were in contact with them as imperfect, flesh and blood humanoids (taller and huskier than we, male and female, the males bearded.
We look like they look because we are half Anunnaki). It was only much later that the Anunnaki were eventually sublimated into cosmic character and status and, later on, conveniently mythologized. Breaking the godspell has seen us go through the stages of abandonment to dissociation, transmutation, religion, rebellion and now to recovery. We have been dysfunctionally looking to the sky where they went for some three thousand years caught in cargo cult religions.
We are ready to step
out of racial adolescence.
Transcendence is conscious metamorphic dimensional exploration,
participatory expansion at the leading edge of our special-case
evolution. The totems and taboos of our racial adolescence
dispelled, Prometheus can get off his rock and reach genetic satori;
Job can get off his dung heap and complete his EST training;
can open his eyes and reach genetic enlightenment.
It is there for
the acceptance and it will rewrite the entirety of our history and
redefine human nature. After a century and a half of examination and
attempted explanation ---- and suppression ---- of the historical,
archaeological, anthropological and astronomical evidence
accumulated, no other explanatory paradigm comes close to the
totally coherent, robust and logical Sitchin thesis. Can and will it
be improved or corrected? Certainly.
dating of dredged materials from the site indicate its age as nine
thousand years old, placing it earlier than Sumer. The histories of
India (declared myth by the British because they were older than the
Empire) speak in detail about civilizations and humans in the very
remote past and mention this city by name.
If the new paradigm is substantially correct then the box is illusory, the creationists are only half wrong and the evolutionists are only half right:
We were created and we are evolving but both
in unique ways.
world view is gradually taking hold, cannot be ignored, and is
waiting in the wings. It is only a matter of time. A unique and
vital characteristic is that it addresses and explains and redefines
the root source of all the ancient religions of the world on a
common basis so that no particular religion can claim privileged
status of any kind. Religion, as we know it, will be understood in
the context of our unique history.
Campus, scientific, and theological imperialism and the fields of anthropology, archaeology, and astronomy, particularly, have tried all the usual unprofessional, unscholarly, shunning, chest thumping, fang baring, proprietary turf posturing and ad hominem attacks through teeth clenched in tenure tetanus, but the thesis becomes more and more robust as new evidence comes in continually from archaeology, anthropology, astronomy, genetics and other disciplines. If Darwin’s thesis was a blockbuster, Sitchin’s thesis is a hydrogen bomb.
We may have been able to afford to dally
with Darwin and defer to religion for as long as we have but the
rapid changes in modern times will force us to consider Sitchin’s
thesis seriously and intensely on a much shorter basis.
Generally, philosophers and scientists
apologize if they think they are even possibly sounding like
creationists, spend most of their energy in either promulgating some
version of Darwinian evolution or attacking what they judge to be
its too radical application, get entangled in arguments about
whether Darwinian evolution can be invoked to explain human
creativity, even aesthetics, and generally put down any other
explanation out of hand.
Creationists, obviously, do not think of humans as
having evolved in the past or as evolving in the present. If we do
not agree that we are evolving, can evolve, or whether any evolution
of a species or individual must be by mindless Darwinian mechanisms,
or whether there are effective methodologies for expediting
conscious self evolution, we will continue to be at standstill. It
is quite ironical, however, that even most of those who hold for
some evolutionary view of humankind evolving to human status in the
past do not seem to think in terms of humans evolving in the
present, much less having a well defined conceptualization of what
that process might be.
Using this rough chronology as a guide, we might anticipate, even
with some exponential bit of acceleration, that the initial general
recognition and acceptance of the Sitchin paradigm will not happen
for, perhaps, some fifty years. We really can’t afford, however, to
see Kuhn’s thesis that scientific revolutions take place only by the
old guard dying off rather than by an acceptance through careful
study, critique and proving out, borne out once again.
That we have adapted loosely in a Darwinian sense over time
is also true but the fact that we realize we can control and
manipulate our realevolutionary progress and direction goes far
beyond the concept of natural selection by chance genetic mutations.
Regardless, that two, perhaps only one percent obviously makes a vast difference. We have 46 chromosomes, primates have 48 and the fusion of the second and third chromosomes in primates is a mystery. Even today, the anthropological sector is scrambling to find a viable ancestor species for us; Homo Erectus is currently being promoted. We were contemporaneous with Neanderthals or even preceded them. We showed up too suddenly in the chronology of the fossil record.
We present with very many startling, obvious differences from primates, and those differences, suddenly appearing in our species, are radical:
It becomes quite obvious why we (as a product of a melding of two racial gene codes where quality control was conditioned by pragmatic purposes) have some four thousand genetic defects and counting rather than none to a handful as all other species, in light of the complexity of the merging. Homo erectus, our half ancestor, took a million years to go from rough flaked stone tools to smooth ones. You could hardly notice any change. We have come from square one to going to Mars in only some 200,000 years.
If the Sitchin paradigm is correct, all these facts are
explained easily. If we ignore this body of information as we read
out and work with the human genome we handicap ourselves
unnecessarily and deprive ourselves of valuable clues and
understanding. Darwinian principles may generally apply to hominid
species before us but they clearly do not apply to our unique
synthetic genesis and subsequent development except as a minor theme
in our climatic and incidental regional adaptations.
It may well be that we are totally determined in our action and thought by our biology but the very fact that we can recognize that possibility and discuss it begs the question How then are we determined? Wilson’s honesty causes him to acknowledge that we have reached a point where we can consciously influence the course of our evolution.
The new paradigm affords a context and perspective in
which to understand our species’ precocity in terms of the rapid
ascendance or our advanced Anunnaki genetic base. We can return to
the subject of man's ultimate nature with confidence, freedom to
radically experiment and explore with understanding and humor. The
same reductionistic science that would honestly insist that we are
totally determined by an infinitely regressive loop of ultimately
quantum mechanical events is already telling us that we are
determined to transcend in an infinitely progressive loop of fractal
like expansions. If we are totally determined, we are clearly
determined to determine our own determinism.
The new paradigm explains
seeming anomalies of acceleration, ooparts and syncretisms so
apparent in the human situation, and is a definitive explanation of
why our species’ "biological evolution is always quickly outrun by
The records also show, however,
that, over time, a handful of humans were granted immortality also
by deliberate decision as a reward for being good subordinates in
various roles usually as kings/foremen or for carrying out some
critical mission. Another lesson: there may well be identifiable
gene sequences that control the aging and dying process that are
clearly and definitely manipulatable giving indication that we will
be able to rectify their possible deliberate suppression.
Understanding our bicameral gene code in the context of the new paradigm will facilitate the elimination of the schizoid puzzles in our collective and individual psyches and the correction and perfecting of our genetics.
If we rethink our situation in terms of our restored history, however, things make a great deal more sense although, for now, there may not be a planetary cure or relief for some of them. If we recognize that:
Then, we will know precisely who and what we are. By enabling us to break the godspell we are freed to collectively work toward planetarily common goals in genetic science:
In the greatest perspective, perhaps we should recognize from the outset that immortality will be both a new and awesome plateau of human existence offering as yet probably undreamed potential and yet, without denigrating that potential at all, ultimately just another "trip", just another step in our meta-evolution, the rapid metamorphosis we have been undergoing since our beginning.
Within those extremes there is the greatest latitude for the inevitable expansion into dimensions which will allow us to become far wiser, individually, through greater experience, greater learning, and the ability to witness the patterns of repetitions of extended periodicity.
Eliminating the pressure of a short life span that
influences our choices and cramps our lives will not just give us
the practical potential to travel easily between star systems and
send the insurance companies into the re-edit mode; it will change
our perspective and our social interactions, certainly the entirety
of human existence, radically.
Over the last 2000 years we have seen scientific or pseudoscientific
doctrines espoused by the various religions being contradicted or
demolished and the religions, repeatedly, although with great delay,
change their positions with regard to our genesis, history,
evolution and science, and modify their doctrines. But the new
paradigm addresses the very root doctrines, positions, claimed
divine franchise and authority of all the religions of the world and
will eventually cause the obsolescence of all institutionalized
religions springing from our ancient relationship of subservience to
The god of the
Judeo-Roman Christian tradition,
Jehovah YHWH was – quite possibly
still is -- the flesh and blood Anunnaki individual,
eventually cosmified into the absolute creator of the universe,
eventually spoken of as infinite love, infinite justice, infinite
this or infinite that, through the bishops and the
scholastic philosophers and theologians.
But that cosmified, composite,
intellectual abstraction is not the Jehovah/YHWH or
Jesus of the
Judeo-Christian religions, the Prime Mover of
Thomas Aquinas or the
Omega point of De Chardin, the Allah of the
Muslim faith, the Brahma
of Hinduism, the Buddha, or the Tao or deity of the religion of your
That way they can still subscribe to the platitudes that the
“God of all religions” is beyond individual doctrinal differences
and contradictory theologies, “all paths lead to the same God” and
similar inane notions. The new paradigm affords us the opportunity
to sort all these elements out, identify the different individual
real gods of the various religions, place them and ourselves in
historical perspective and recognize the metaphysical
conceptualizations of “deity”, East and West, as
a product of our
own evolving racial psychology.
The ultimate driving force will most probably be a degree of desperation and desire for peace gradually manifesting in the entire planetary population so strong that it will cause an abandonment of the authoritarian leaders and dogmas of the religions, followed by a younger generation of clerics who will recognize the inevitable and introduce new interpretations and relaxed rules to gradually smooth the phase out and transition, hopefully to humanitarian organizations and peace movements.
The signs of transition of some
religious organizations to charitable and ecological focus may be
seen as an almost inchoate beginning of this kind of transformation.
It would also be foolish not to expect diehard fundamentalist
No, paradoxically, not as such. Not as we have defined atheism previously as the denial of the existence of any kind of god, cosmic or otherwise. It simply is a long overdue correction of some local, intra-solar system politics, relatively rather pedestrian in cosmic perspective. Garden variety atheism can now be understood as an early sign of precocious species adolescent rebellion and questioning of the authority of the obviously all too humanoid characteristics of whatever sublimated local Anunnaki "god" is still the object of worship (the original meaning of worship was “work for”: AVOD = work). Yes, the subservient godspell religious stage will be surpassed.
The resultant freedom, however, will
engender and foster greater curiosity about reality and a seeking
for ultimate causes far more metaphysically adequate and
commensurate with our expanding consciousness far beyond even the
search for the Law of Everything. The element of transcendence
associated with some religions will be, at minimum, understood as
generic consciousness expansion into higher and higher
importance of this overhaul is critical because it involves the
concepts of mind, consciousness, intelligence,
transcendence, dimensionality, self.
The cumulative evidence and restored history has enabled us to grasp the true nature of our genetic creation, our traumatic transition, and the opportunity to emerge from species adolescence and amnesia into species maturity. All the political, economic, social, scientific, new age, evolutionary variables are only symptomatic; the genetic level is where the profound realization must blossom.
The restoration of our generic history and
a generic definition of what a human is afford us the advancement
that will take the planet off hold.
We are witnessing the last gasp of religious fundamentalism worldwide. Whether we chose to acknowledge it or not, we are already well into one of “…. those Grand Moments when the whole scale of being is reevaluated” as John Petersen has characterized it. It is within these redefinitions that the resolutions to the problems and obstacles deeply embedded in our species’ and individual psyches’ are to be found.
Dylan Thomas rather crudely, let us not go blind into that daylight.
But how do we accomplish the transition from our current planetary
standstill to planetary consensus gracefully and quickly? It’s best
to recognize from the outset that the revolution required, the
meta-wild card so radical in its implications and ramifications and
requirements, that there is no single discipline, no institution,
certainly no individual or group who can bring it about alone. It is
so planetarily encompassing that stepping outside of this box is
almost impossible. The change will have to come from within.
Gardner has the advantage of one hundred and fifty years of discovery and translation of the Sumerian source material, knowledge of Anunnaki politics and the interaction of Enki and Enlil implemented by the latest scholarship on the Dead Sea Scrolls and Nag Hamadi documents through the brilliant work of the Australian theologian, Barbara Thiering .
Working as a genealogist with data available through privileged access to the private archives of thirty European royal family clients, Gardner has brought to light the fact that there exists a robust, highly documented, genealogical, genetic history of a special bloodline carrying all the way back to the Anunnaki and Sumeria.
This information, possessed by the heterodox tradition of Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer fearful of the boiling oil of the Inquisition, has always been available. He has identified the Holy Grail as this bloodline of humans, enhanced by Enki with additional Anunnaki genes, intended to be human leader-rulers in a tradition of “servants of the people” traceable all the way back to Sumer. The modern word Grail traces back to graal, san graal, which, etymologically, stems from the Sumerian root words GRA AL, meaning special bloodline.
The bloodline of human
leaders, further enhanced with Anunnaki genes, initiated by
(The Lord, Adonai), passed from Sumer through
Egypt to Israel
through David and the messiahs (anointed ones), fostered by the
Essene communities as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Jesus was an Essene in the bloodline as was Mary Magdalene.
They were man and
wife and had children. Jesus was of a liberal persuasion within that
The reason why women have always been denigrated and suppressed by the Roman Church is genetic: the bloodline was dependent on transmission through the women of the line and any recognition of them would be recognition of the line. This is a further elucidation of our genetic background.
It is manifestly unjust that the geneticist is deprived of this vital block of information about the genome due to the preclusive attitude of the “bishops” still reigning in archaeology. We are the product of that Nefilim technology, a mutant species with bicameral genetics, bicameral mind. We can finally integrate both halves of our nature. Our Homo Erectus component will bring us back to harmony with this planet, making it a nice place to live and a nice place to visit. Our Anunnaki component will teach us how to move off planet gracefully.
The word from station DNA is
these "gods" wear designer genes.