I Peter II: IX
"......You are a Chosen Generation, A Royal Priesthood, an Holy
Nation, a Peculiar People....."
The phrase Royal Priesthood will be familiar to scholars who have
studied the concept of priest kingship. The word royal derives from
the Latin Regalis meaning to rule. Originally this meant ’to apply a
rule’, meaning to be able to measure, observe and thus divine and
understand the hidden span or workings of matter.
In this sense a ruler was one who was born with the ability to
measure and hence understand the hidden workings of the Cosmos. Here
we have a direct reference to derkesthai. Hence the regalis was the
derkesthai and the derkesthai was the Dragon King. The condition of
being royal in the accepted sense is derived from being born into a
royal family, clan, race (species) or tribe.
Contextually and originally this phrase could only have been used in
connextion with the Davidic concept of royalty passed through the
blood as the ’holy spirit’ (genetic inheritance) of the gods: Mana,
Maia or Maja (Maga or Magi, Magha, Maxa: greatness).
The word priest is from the Old English
preost related to the Latin
presbyter, meaning an ’Elder’ who, in classical terms, was a
priest-king. Essentially then a king and a priest were the same
thing and could only be such by birth, as was the tradition.
Holy is from the Old English
halig and the word means: morally
perfect, pure in heart, set apart to a sacred use. Holy is related
etymologically to Hal: sound (of mind, body and spirit), and is
connected with hail, heal and whole.
The linguistic connection should be noted between the
Old Norse Heil
and the Germanic Haegl, meaning hailstorm: related to the sacred
rune derived from the Star of Anu which is the basic device from
which the christian Chi Rho cross is derived.
In this we have a clear relation with the
children of the Dragon;
the sons and daughters of Anu who were the Eurasian sacral-royal
Arya and the Sidhe or Scythian Nation of the Wise or holy; the
"whole" or "complete" ones, the transcended god-kings and
goddess-queens who obtained wisdom through holiness or wholeness:
the Gnome or gnostic royalty whose wisdom was derived from their
innate completeness as whole beings at one with themselves and thus
with the Cosmos.
The word nation is derived from the Latin root
natio meaning ’to be
born’. Here we enter in upon birth, gens and race; and hence blood
and genetic inheritance. An Holy Nation means a race that is not
ordained as being holy through ritual mumbo-jumbo but are
automatically holy by birth, genetic inheritance and innate
The word Peculiar means: own (singular), of one’s own, appropriated,
preserved, characteristic, special. The phrase "Peculiar People", as
well as the rest of the passage used by Peter to describe gentile
converts would originally have been used solely to describe a race
or tribe, such as the priestly heirs of the family of Jesus (and
those like him), who was an Essene, a Druid or Magus by
St. Columba’s definition and recognized as such by the Magi of Babylon,
and a priest of the Draconian White Brotherhood - the Egyptian Therapeutate
- whose wife was the ’Ishtar’ or Ubaid/Scythian ’Inanna
Priestess’ Mary Magdalene.
If he wrote the foregoing at all, then
Peter, whose treason against
Jesus is documented and whose schism with Jesus’ brother
academically accepted, appears to have used the passage to convince
outsiders in foreign lands that they too could be the elect of God
by courtesy of what has become to the Church, the somewhat abstract
and nebulous ’Holy Spirit’: originally the very Mana or
was the sole requisite or peculiarity of, and was only passed down
through, the blood royal.
Peter and Paul’s schismatic sect was struggling at the time and both
men said anything that came to mind in order to gain as many
converts as they could. If Peter actually wrote I Peter II: IX at
all, then all one can say is that, having discovered a good
money-making scheme, Peter and Paul were attempting to afford
themselves some form of security in numbers in the face of growing
Roman hostility, and ensure for themselves and their agents a free
lunch and a warm bed, wherever those agents fancied taking a holiday
break around the Mediterranean.
This kind of scriptural and doctrinal manipulation later became
endemic within the Roman Church who lied when they claimed to have
the right to make kings from peasants through anointing and
coronation in the same manner as Peter seems to suggest that priest
kings can be created by splashing people with oil and sanctified
water and feeding them nondescript groceries. What utter nonsense.
This is why the Church is in such a mess today; it’s full of people
who have swallowed the Church’s lies and have been baptized,
anointed and given communion in the hollow sham mimicry of an
equally hollow historical fraud.
It is therefore very likely that along with the vast bulk of
Christian scriptural history and doctrine, which was "canonized" -
meaning doctored - by the Roman Church, the passage I Peter II: IX
was attributed to Peter by the Churchmen who actually altered its
emphasis post temps and ad hoc and further, deliberately took it out
of context in order to make it apply to the masses they were
targeting in order to obtain money and power.
Here we have the birth of the modern, rabid PC preoccupation with
equality as a moral right. The homogenous fantasy-nightmare in which
we are all trapped today began with the Church’s desire to include
the masses in order to sell them a lie and bleed them dry in vast
numbers. Contemporary homogeny and equality are the children of this
ancient, thoroughly dishonest pecuniary greed, and like the greed
and fraud that inseminated it, the concept of human equality is as
equally dishonest and fraudulent, and is championed today for
exactly the same pecuniary reasons as it always was.
A bit of bathwater, a dab of face cream and a light lunch may be
refreshing, but they are not substitutes for, and nor will they
confer, the Sang Rael; the ’Blood Royal’. But poor, stupid,
acquisitive people believe that this has made all the difference and
in consequence their belief refuses to allow them to see what others
see: that Christians are a bunch of blind, self deluding hypocrites
and fools; whitened sepulchers whose all too manifest sin is
compounded by a greed which is all the worse for believing nonsense,
simply in order to obtain - prompted by irrational, deliberately
inculcated fear - the non-existent salvation of their non-existent
souls. They are no different post hocus pocus than they were before.
People really are gullible.
Even in Jewish sacred tradition, of which
New Testament Christianity
was a significant and legitimate part, the priesthood was a caste
that one was born into, as was kingship. The idea that anyone,
particularly gentiles, could become Levite priests or Davidic kings
at the whim of a non-Davidic, non-Levite Galilean malcontent like
Peter was unthinkable, especially as ’christianity’ at that time was
a Jewish, genuinely royal, priestly sect.
At his birth the sect’s leader, as a scion of the
Royal House of
David, posed a threat to the throne of Israel that was genuine
enough to have Herod scouring the country seeking to kill him and
thus secure Herod’s continuing position as a puppet king. If Jesus’
kingship had been merely symbolic, Herod would have considered him
The original Church or Circle of Jesus was, by its very nature and
existence, a royal court and an holy temple, not an open house for allcomers.
I Peter I: vs II
Peter calls these peasants "The elect according to
the foreknowledge of God the Father, (the elect) through
sanctification of the (Holy) Spirit, (the elect) unto obedience and
sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ".
This passage basically says that mere belief in, and obedience to,
the sanctions and tenets of the schismatic, bloodless Church (of
those who were thrown out by Jesus’ own family) will confer upon the
new, non-royal convert, a special royal role and identity previously
and exclusively set apart for Priest Kings whose magical ability to
act as both priests and kings only derived from a genetic capacity
passed down as the unique quality Of The Royal Blood.
Supposedly, if one allowed the bloodless protagonist of a
manipulated interpretation of Jesus’ message to wet one’s head with
water made holy solely by that person’s opinion; and one allowed
one’s mouth to be stuffed with cheap bread and wine made sacred
solely by wishful thinking, this gave one the right to think of
one’s self as a member of the Davidic Royal House.
If this is the case, then if I buy a load of Corgi dogs, make
offensive observations about the Chinese, wear a tacky Hannoverian
interpretation of the equally tacky Stewart tartan, drink gin all
day and attempt to seduce anything on two legs, I would legitimately
become a member of the Royal House of Windsor, by opinion and
wishful thinking alone, am I right?
No, I didn’t think I was. So how come a coward like Peter, who
wasn’t a relative of Jesus, who betrayed him in fact and split from
Jesus brother James because he wanted to be top dog, how come He
gets to decide who will and who will not be a member of the Royal
House of David and a Priest of the Royal Eurasian Druidhe?
In its original context the entire passage from I Peter II vs IX
would have been used to describe and could only have applied to
those who - like Jesus and his Aryan-Scythian, elven ancestors -
were of the blood royal and thus Dragon Kings.
The entire battle between the Roman Catholic Church and the
desposyni has been exactly about this point: who are the true
spiritual descendants of Christ and hence his rightful and genuine
royal, priestly successors? In any area of social convention past or
present, blood always takes precedence.
The "Royal priesthood" and the "Holy Nation" of the Christian Bible
are not the Christians themselves as they have always prided
themselves as being, but rather; their sworn enemies the Elven
Anukim: The Annunagi or Shining Ones; the Dragons whose land of
Idumea the Christian God set apart and made sacred to the Dragons
(Isaiah 34: 5-17 & 35: 1-10)
Idumea, the land of the
Repha’im, was a land of blessing and
abundance, a second Eden, in which was found the Holy Way (Tao), the
road of the wandering men (the Scythian kings; the sons of Cain the
wanderer) whom Isaiah calls The Ransomed and Redeemed, and to whom
in prophecy the Christian God promises Zion. This was fulfilled when
Baldwin de Vere - a Son of Cain and a scion of kings - became King
The Dragons - and in the King James Version of the Holy Bible - the
Daughters of the Owl (Lilith), are therefore - according to
the true children of God; "A Chosen Generation, a Royal Priesthood,
an Holy Nation, a Peculiar People......".
St John XVII: XIV
......."and the world hath hated them because they
are not of the world".
St John XVII: XVI
......."They are not of the world, even as I am
not of the world".
(Attributed to Jesus)