The Thousand Year Elven
The study of history is as much the study of etymology as it is the
study and interpretation of actual events. Both are often a daunting
task because ultimately history is always written by the victors and
the meaning of language and the significance of historical events
are invariably decided by those whose hands have taken a firm hold
of the tiller that steers society’s ship.
The word ’fairy’ as we have come to understand it from our educators
(or deceivers) suggests one of a variety of mythic or imaginary
beings whose shape, size, habitat and customs differ according to
geography and ethnic or aboriginal folk tradition. Lately a fairy
has come to mean a homosexual as well.
A real fairy, who couldn’t give a toss about anyone’s sexual
orientation, "it’s all bread and bread after all", whilst dismissing
the latter definition entirely, would nevertheless take extreme
exception to the former definition for the following reason. Next to
the Jews, no race in history has suffered more brutality and racial
prejudice than the Elves.
For over a thousand years the church initiated a consistent policy
of genocide that was and still is unrivalled in human history in
terms of its relentlessness, violence and hatred. The author uses
the word genocide and in 1944 Raphael Lemkin formulated the term to
"an attempt at the destruction of the national group as an
entity, and the actions involved are directed at individuals, not in
their individual capacity but as members of a national group".
The United Nations elaborate by saying that genocide includes "the
systematic moral debasement of a group, people or nation". The Jews
have suffered just this except in one particular respect. If you
were asked your race or nationality today and you replied "Jewish"
no one would think twice about it.
However, Mr Green or Miss Leibowitz if instead, after replying
"Jewish", the listener burst into fits of laughter and replied
"Don’t be such a lunatic, Jews don’t exist, they’re just a myth",
how would you feel then? Isn’t that what genocide or ethnic
cleansing is all about, eradicating all trace of a culture from the
human consciousness? This is what has happened to the Fairy Race.
Certainly the Germans tried it with the Jews and if they had been
given the time the Church has had to achieve what they have
achieved, no doubt in a thousand years from now the Jews would have
also become a myth. But this has already happened to the Fairies.
Little trace of their culture or identity exists outside a handful
of the old families or beyond the covers of sanitized story books
for children, or tomes on rustic folk tradition, in which hints of
the old lore still remain hidden.
Mr Green and Miss Leibowitz can go about their business in relative
freedom and can be openly proud of their nationality and their
cultural heritage. For a thousand years the fairies have had to
conceal their identities and live in hiding for fear of being torn
to shreds or burnt alive. For a thousand years it has been a crime
to be of the elven race, and you may be surprised to learn that it
Today, whilst the Jews, by the Grace of God, enjoy the acceptance of
their race won through the backlash of public opinion against the
Nazi Holocaust, the Thousand Year Elven Holocaust has been forgotten
and still the fairies have to remain in hiding contemporarily for
fear of ridicule and ostracisation.
In 1736 the Witchcraft Act was repealed. However, it was replaced by
the Fraudulent Mediums Act which is still in force and simply says
in one way what the Witchcraft Act said in another.
According to Christian doctrine no one can contact departed spirits
and if this is admitted, then perforce all Mediums are fraudulent
because the English language defines a medium as being a person who
has commerce with the souls of the dead.
By Dragon definition a witch, meaning a
Fairy, is a Medium and the
law wouldn’t lay a fine distinction upon exactly what the witch
mediates with or how, if they decided they wanted to win an
argument. It will be noticed at this juncture that by definition, in
their prayers to - and visions of - Christ, the Virgin Mary and the
departed Saints, all those who currently call themselves Christians
are in fact indulging in mediumship, the very act which
says is impossible and by which edict they render their entire
following heretical. This has always been the case and during the
witch craze, all things considered, it was actually the heretics who
were burning the orthodox Christians.
If the witch mediates with ancestors, she claims to be able to
contact the dead. As the church says this is impossible, the witch
is a fraud and is breaking the law. Ergo to be, or claim to be a
witch, and consequently a fairy, on that count alone, is illegal.
The witchcraft laws are alive and well and living in a statute book
near you. Further by implication, it is possible for a fairy to be
tried under the treason act as well, on two counts.
Firstly Her Majesty the Queen is a Christian and head of the
of England. No fairy aware of his or her history and the atrocities
committed against their people could ever be what is contemporarily
thought of as an orthodox Christian and in this sense they run the
risk of committing an act of Treason by denying the Christian faith,
because in doing so, like others following different paths, they
refute and insult the faith of the Her Majesty.
Secondly, the fairy families stood in absolute opposition to the
Donation of Constantine, this being the document that was used to
usurp them and initiate the Elven Holocaust itself in the first
The Donation of Constantine (Latin
The Donation of Constantine first appeared during the 8th century
and was a document which purported to recognize the Roman popes as
Christ’s representatives on Earth and to donate to Pope Sylvester
Roman Church all those Imperial powers formerly invested in
the Throne of Byzantium.
The ’Donation’, the Church claimed, was written in the 4th century
at the insistence of the emperor Constantine who, the Church said,
was so grateful for having been cured of leprosy by Pope Sylvester,
that he gave into the Church’s hand, the entire power and wealth of
the unified Roman Empire, including the right to crown and dethrone
kings. Now that is what you call expensive medical insurance.
Supposedly written before 337 - the year of Constantine’s death -
the Donation of Constantine actually didn’t make an appearance on
the stage of European history until four hundred years later. So
far-reaching are the powers bestowed upon the Church by this
document, one would have thought that it would have been made public
at the time of its bestowal and not centuries later.
The provisions of the Donation were enforced in 751 AD. following
Merovingians were deposed by the Church and replaced by
their lackies, the Mayors of the Palace who later
became known as the Carolingians. The Church had made
a compact with the Mayors and offered to ’recognize’ their legitimacy as rulers if they would
dispense with the true Dragon Kings. The deal was done and
Carolingians were made the puppet rulers under the Roman Church.
The Donation, because it was made by a Dragon King -
Constantine - legitimized the Church’s right to take this action because, to all
intents and purposes they had the authority of Dragon Kingship given
up to them by this Charter, which no doubt the Merovingians knew to
be a fraud, which is why they refused to recognize the authority of
the Church to meddle in affairs of state. What do we learn from
We can see from the Church’s choice of ’benefactor’ that the Church
was well aware that universally, only the Dragon Blood
would be recognized as true kings and so they chose Constantine because he
was known to have been descended from both the Brittanic Pendragon
House and the Dragon House of David. Furthermore as a member of the
desposyni - the heirs of the Lord - the blood descendants and
legitimate representatives of Jesus Christ, in the Donation, it
appeared as if Constantine had relinquished his hereditary spiritual
position as a Messiah and invested it in the Papacy.
By suggesting they were the representatives of Christ, the
popes were claiming Dragon descent for themselves, because it was well
known that Jesus had descendants and that those were part of the
only Eurasian dynasty which was authorized to be kings - the
Overlords or Dragons. It would have appeared to the public then,
that in the displacement of the Merovingians, one
Dragon dynasty was
being replaced by another, albeit a paper one.
This would reduce any danger of mass unrest. As time passed however,
it became uncomfortably clear that the function of kingship under
the Merovingians had been entirely different to that under the
Carolingians. Whilst the Merovingians had formerly assumed the role
of overseers, sages and wise counsellors, the Carolingians and their
successors, prompted by the Church, became deliberately poorly
educated, pig ignorant, insensitive tyrants and territorial
Dragon Kingship and the Grail Code had died to be replaced by a
corrupted form of feudal totalitarianism and brutal, economic
slavery as the Church carefully and strategically replaced the old
dynasties with its own merchant-class client families who, from that
day forth, became vassals of
Lastly we learn that from 751 AD the true Dark Age began in
earnest and the Elven Holocaust was initiated and would run its
course for another thousand years until, in England at least, the
witchcraft laws were repealed in 1736. North of the border in
Scotland, however, the persecution of witches in the 1700’s was at
its fiercest until the end of the century.
During this time history has witnessed the rise of the Church of
Rome and its successful struggle for power. In time no dynasty ruled
in Europe or remained in power unless the Church sanctioned their
reign. The Church chose the royal families, it crowned kings and it
deposed its detractors. In short, the Church, under the auspices of
the Donation of Constantine was the sole and supreme temporal power
in Europe and the known world. Without this purported imperial
benefice however, the Church would have remained a marginalized
mediterranean cult contesting for patronage along with a host of
other gnostic Christian denominations.
The royal dynasties sponsored by the Church and crowned by its
Divine Right instituted their courts and parliaments, passed laws
and employed agents to act on their behalf. To all intents and
purposes it seemed as if the Church had the absolute right of
Dragons and wielded power by the very sanction of Jesus Christ and
No monarch reigning today and no government under the monarch or
instituted in their name would enjoy their position if the Church,
empowered by the Donation, had not given them permission to rule in
the first place. Without the Donation of Constantine, European
history today would be totally different and none of the dynasties
past or present would have had the right to have reigned and nor
would they reign now and none of their governments or agencies would
have exercised power.
One wee hiccup though, one slight problem. Not much the author
grants, but worth a passing mention all the same. The Donation of
Constantine is a complete and utter fraud and the Church was never
given any temporal powers at all, let alone the right to found
dynasties, crown kings or institute governments. The whole document
was a lie from beginning to end and was known to be a fake since
Lorenzo Valla applied the methods of historical criticism to it
during the Renaissance and found the thing to be a worthless sham.
How do we know Valla was correct? The New Testament references
incorporated into the wording of the Donation were taken from the
Latin Vulgate version of the Bible. The Vulgate Bible was compiled
by St. Jerome who was born more than two decades after Constantine
was supposed to have signed the Donation! The actual Vulgate Bible
wording that appears in the Donation didn’t exist until
St Jerome invented it, fifty years after the document had supposedly been
dated and signed by the emperor, by which time Constantine had been
dead for decades and couldn’t have signed the Dragon’s rights away
The language of the Donation is eighth century clerical or dog
Latin, whilst the Latin used in the 4th century Empire was late
classical Roman. The Imperial and Papal ceremonials described in
Donation didn’t exist in Constantine’s time but were developed some
centuries later and because of all this, every historical scholar on
the entire Planet acknowledges the fact that the Donation of
Constantine is an utter fake.
Several documentary instances of the Church’s use of the Donation
to assert their authority in the medieval period still exist,
including the letter of Pope Gregory IX entitled ’Si Memoriam Beneficiorum’
dated October 23rd 1236 and addressed to the Emperor Frederick II.
Pope Gregory writes:
".......that as the Vicar of the Prince of
Apostles (the Roman Pope) governed the empire of priesthood and of
souls in the whole world so he should also reign over things and
bodies throughout the whole world; and considering that he should
rule over earthly matters by the reins of justice to whom - as it is
known - God had committed on earth the charge over spiritual things,
the Emperor Constantine humbled himself by his own vow and handed
over the empire to the perpetual care of the Roman Pontiff with the
Imperial Insignia and sceptres and the City and Duchy of
People in the medieval and
Renaissance period, confronted with this
document, didn’t generally criticize the Donation on the grounds of
its veracity, they just exclaimed aghast that they couldn’t believe
that Constantine would have been stupid enough to have given the
Roman Church everything.
From the Donation we understand that Constantine offered
all the robes and Crowns of office but the Pope, being such a humble
man, gave them back to the Emperor. Which sort of lets the Church
off the hook should some malcontent turn up and say "show us the
geologically encrusted tin hat and flash threads that Connie gave
you then, tosh". If the readers peruse the Donation for themselves
they will be appalled at the pretentious egotism, the arrogance and
the sheer material greed of the Church, as authors of the document.
The fraudulent imperial power of the Vatican to create kings by
’coronation’ - derived from this faked 8th century ’Donation of
Constantine’ (english version) - was later adopted by the Archbishops of the Church of
England with the complicity of the Tudors, who were Catholics
When he split with Rome, Henry VIII still retained and later
ratified and re-established in the Anglo-Catholic Church of England
the fraudulent right of the Church’s clergy to create by coronation,
a succession of British monarchs. Because this was an illegal act,
the ’Donation of Constantine’ being proved to be a completely fake
document, no Royal Elven House that ’knew its Onions’ and cared
about social justice could possibly bring itself to recognize a
Christian British Monarchy or any of their Church sponsored, Church
crowned predecessors or any of their regnant or formerly regnant,
European cousin Houses.
Because the Donation was a fraud and no subsequent priest of any
Catholic derived denomination ever had the right to crown kings,
Britain has had no legally reigning Monarchs for 900 years. As a
consequence of this, ALL the laws passed by these monarchs were and
are illegal and worthless and ALL the governmental agencies set up
by or derived from these monarchs or their laws are also illegal and
worthless up to the present day.
When considering this, the reader might like to think of the fact
that all the arrests ever made by the Police in Britain and Europe
are acts of kidnap and Habeus Corpus, whilst any man who took up
arms for the Crown and killed for his country is unprotected by law
and guilty therefore of murder.
However, paradoxically, as the entire British legal system is
illegal, there are no laws, and so the crimes of Habeus Corpus and
Murder as we define them today, simply don’t exist. Subconsciously
people know that their politicians and monarchs have no legitimate
authority to rule over them and they manifest this knowledge in an
increasing disrespect for these optional, arbitrary and illusory
social conventions, which is yet another reason why social order is
breaking down. If the UN is right, we may face chaos in the near
future; and all because of a stupid fraud, perpetrated by a bunch of
myopically greedy, maniacal peddlars of false religion who are now
Again, for asserting this kind of view the fairies are implicitly
guilty of Treason, even though all British laws are constitutionally
illegal and the act of treason itself is a non sequitur. Think of
the implications of this.
Any nation state in the Christian world today which is still a
monarchy or which has evolved as part of a successive, developing
political process originating from a monarchy, by virtue of its
continuing sanction from, or sponsorship by, the Church of whatever
denomination, it is unauthorized by any temporal or divine power to
coerce anyone to obey any law originating at any stage of that
In effect Britain, Europe and America are ruled by the sword and
that sword is being wielded by people who are no more than short
sighted, self seeking robber barons. They have no constitutional
right to rule even in America, where in the 19th century the
libertarian commentator, Lysander Spooner, demonstrated that the
consensual nature of the original document, upon which the
subsequent, consecutive clauses are founded, was being flouted,
thereby making the entire Constitution illegal. Pierre Proud’hon
called them all "Tyrants and Usurpers". Next time you are tempted to
eulogize Western Democracy, bite your tongue and let your brain
select first gear before you open your mouth. Flawed or otherwise,
the idea that the English speaking world has any democracy at all is
At the beginning of this work the author stated that the people have
been conned enough. He now hopes that the readers might appreciate
for themselves the precise extent to which the people have actually
been deceived and have accepted a state of affairs where they and
their ancestors have been enslaved by a Chameleon-like corporate
body that has destroyed their creativity and robbed them of their
psychological liberty and their freedom of conscience for over a
The entire moral basis of our society is founded upon a massive
historical lie which has twisted the minds of generations of
individuals until they have become terrified of the natural drives
of their own bodies and souls.
The resultant taboos that have been created by the sick,
manipulative moral standards of a usurping bunch of egomaniacs have
been used to divide the minds of the people and make them dependant
on the Church-State for solutions to the problems of resisting Satan
and fighting temptation and sin, when these contrived, nonsensical
whimsies never existed in the first place.
As a result, western Christian society was turned into an open air
lunatic asylum packed full of lost souls who weren’t lost at all and
had no need of a cure for diseases of the soul they weren’t actually
suffering from in the first place.
The Church created the confusion and the division and then offered
the solution. In fear the population invested its trust in the
perfidious Church and in return for their confidence the Church
turned the people into slaves and an entire civilization into a
manufacturing plant to service their own greed for luxury and power.
For a thousand years the fairies have remained silent about their
identities - formerly for fear of their lives - latterly for fear of
becoming social outcasts and objects of mirth and derision. Still
however, a shadow of menace lies over the ancient families. Greed
will go to any length to ensure the continuity of its satisfaction
and the same motives that prompted the Church to murder and lie in
the past, still prompt their merchant-class puppets to kill and
Whilst people therefore now understand the fairy to be either a
gossamer winged sprite or an effeminate male - both are considered
harmless jokes - such a contemporary opinion flies in the face of
the facts where the fairy of history is concerned.
In studying the fairy in the context of both Celtic and medieval
history it must be remembered that the tribes to whom the Victorians
ascribed the appellation ’Celtic’ were not a homogenous or
integrated racial group and the Celts themselves never saw
themselves as a cohesive, pan-European nation of peoples.
Furthermore, like their medieval descendants, they had, within an
indistinct collection of tribes, a patriarchal, misogynistic
culture, which stands in complete opposition to the popular view
that the matriarchal ’Celts’ promoted a policy of sexual equality.
(Green: ’Celtic World’)
The modern myth concerning the Celts, promoted by ’New Age’
racketeers who are rehashing earlier popular trends, tends to set
these rather ordinary people into some kind of ’Golden Era’ of
cultural expression and heroism, punctuated by the achievement of a
state of high spiritual awareness, when in fact they were average,
workaday farming folk who treated their women like dirt.
Nymphs and Shepherds....Go Away!
The Georgians and Victorians, for socio-political propaganda
purposes, had various revivals and retrospectives that were intended
to celebrate the merchant-class era of industrial prosperity and the
British Imperial oppression and destruction of the cultures of other
peoples, by having the audacity to equate such dubious ventures with
various ’Golden Ages’ of the past. (para Gombrich).
Principally it was these individuals who patronized the artistic
movements whose Svengalis, seeing that the parvenus were only too
willing to advance and buy the lie, produced the kind of
sentimental, heroic nonsense that plugged the gap in the nostalgia
market which was created by the desire of the newly rich to feel
that they were justified by history in the exploitation of the poor
in the mills and the mines.
They wished to equate their ’victories’ in the market places with
those of the ’warrior king’ or ’noble savage’ on the battle fields
of classical antiquity and, by sponsoring kitsch daubers, they felt
they could become identified with the highest artistic and cultural
achievements of the various ages whose elan flattered these
imperialists’ and industrialists’ egotism and furthered their
exploitative, propagandist aims.
However, in Newtonian terms, where every action engenders an equal
and opposite reaction, the patronage afforded these malodorous
pigment shufflers and pebble shavers, by magnates whose cultural
tastes, nevertheless, only ran to the kind of jingoistic or
sentimental - one hesitates to say pictorial or sculptural -
effluent that would have us pseudo-intellectual, epicurean types
running to Thomas Crapper’s Patent Water Closet to be sick; led to a
calamitous pass where the aesthetically ambivalent skill these
pallet-knife and chisel-wielding cultural assassins lent to the
rectally retentive rendition of what they had the temerity to call
"Their Art", set a trend where utter shite became the highest and
the most prevalent expression of Victorian middle-class and
pseudo-aristocratic cultural sensibilities.
In the words of the art historian Sir Ernst Gombrich "There is no
such thing as ’Art’......there are only artists". And by God: By
their fruits ye shall know them well enough.
William Colman Hunt
Now there’s a name to conjure with. And if you did you would arrive
at an adequate approximation of what his art was like, without
actually having to go through the unnerving experience of having to
look at - or even be in the same room as - one of his paintings.
Indeed, if you juggled with his name for long enough, you wouldn’t
even have to risk being on the same continental land-mass as one of
his venomous vignettes, but you would still be able to intuitively
apprehend the full extent of the bilious upwelling of horror and
revulsion engendered in those who, by hap-chance, have stumbled
unawares upon one of his smug abominations. Particularly
distressing, although possessed of an almost imperceptible,
indefinably reassuring quality nevertheless, is his Swansong which
he poignantly entitled: ’Portrait of the Artist as a Diseased
’Portrait of the
Artist as a Diseased Badger’
Although this is a little known, difficult and obscure work, it is
thought by some to be a fitting obituary for a man who is described
as "a crude and rudimentary colourist with little taste or
sensibility... whose works are now regarded as failures" (Osbourne).
The Victorians loved him.
In their gaudy, nouveau-riche Georgian-Classical or Victorian
Neo-Tudor demesnes, which they mercilessly and relentlessly adorned
with inane moral and social re-affirmations, revivalist Gaelic
gauche and pseudo-Medieval Art and Arms; culturally vacuous steel
barons and cotton magnates would often display framed family charts
- tracing the kinds of instant, purchased ancestry purchased by an
ancestor - that any genuine self respecting nobleman would run
screaming from in horror.
Their ’miladies’ would hold soirees, for the local cognoscenti and
well-to-do, where the cultural á la carte invariably offered copious
helpings of moronic, Byronic neo-classical claptrap garnished
lavishly with choruses of criminally insane, musical atrocities like
"Nymphs and shepherds come away" sung by fat falsetto aunts who
hadn’t a clue what Nymphs were customarily renowned for getting up
to when they actually did ’come away’ with or without the rustic
parties of the second part.
And these arachnid recreational activities were namely: Cannibalism
("fancy another helping of Shepherd’s Pie, Myrtle?") and - as their
name unavoidably suggests - Nymphomania; which found the outworking
of the expression of its inner, emotive rage and lust to be manifest
in such acts as oral sex, buggery, simultaneous multiple penetration
and bestiality; with a wide variety of domestic livestock, and an
equally varied selection of naturally occurring regional fauna -
including wolves, dogs, donkeys, wild goats, rams, horses, snakes
and - purely for betting purposes - ferrets.
Such sexually epicurean piquancies were practiced with gay abandon
alongside rampant homosexuality (amongst the shepherds who’d managed
to survive lunch), Sapphism, drug abuse, alcoholic debauchery,
Travel Scrabble, and a range of other delightfully civilized,
lubricious distractions. (Riley-Scott: ’Phallic Worship’)
At that time the true nature of Celtic culture was censored,
sanitized and idealized so much that the view we have had of it up
until recently reflected more our predecessors confusion, chauvinism
and wishful thinking concerning the period than it did the reality
of the era they lauded.
Modern archaeology coupled with a realistic interpretation of the
information, less colored by the concern for moral rectitude, has
uncovered a picture of ’Celtic’ society that is clearer than it was
in our great-great grandma’s day. Indeed with the wealth of new
knowledge we find it difficult to apply so liberally the generic
term ’Celt’ in the same way our forebears were wont to do.
Scholarship concerning what previously we might have thought of as
the ’heroic era’ of Celtic civilization, conveyed in modern popular
works that owe much of their sentimentality to the erroneous and
prim historical view of yesteryear, is garbled and confused.
The images of the Noble Celt: the tall blonde warrior chieftain, or
the flaxen-haired Swan Maidens of Lyr are not Celtic at all. We
still seem to think of all Celts in that way though because we are
sold the image by people who, in accepting as fact the Victorian
delusion, think that this distinct caste was representative of the
Celts as a whole, when in fact they represented a tiny minority of
individuals who were foreign to and essentially divorced in racial
and cultural terms from the people we now know were the real Celts
living in that era.
When we looked at the stories contained in the ’Annals of Irish
History’, the Irish ’Book of Invasions’ or
the Welsh ’Mabinogian’ we
would have been inclined to think that these documents were about
the Celts when in fact they were about a strange race of foreigners
who reigned alongside these dark-haired, swarthy, stocky little
farmers for nearly two thousand years. From these stories we obtain
our idea of what the ’Celts’ were like, when in fact they weren’t
Celts at all, they were Scythians, the Elves,
the Fairies, The
These Scythians were a tightly knit, insular group who practiced
Phoenician and Pharaonic marriage customs to
keep the blood pure and
in all other respects they also tended to remain detached from the
common swell of humanity.
Differing greatly from the customs of the patriarchal Celtic peoples
they reigned over, theirs was a society that appreciated the
position and the power of its women and correspondingly favored the
idea of matrilinear descent.
The Scythians came to reign across Eurasia and normally we find them
attached to various indigenous populations, but occasionally they
were an indigenous population in themselves, such as the Danaan of
Eire and the Ainu of Hokkaido. Unlike their
Celtic clients, whose
caste system, based on kinship, was male dominated and hierarchical,
the Scythian caste system which operated amongst their own people
Though individual’s functions and tasks varied, all nevertheless
were Royal and therefore equal. Proof of this is to be found in the
Brehon Law concerning inheritance. This social structure became
superimposed onto the Celtic system and produced the sort of
divisions we find in Hinduism where the people are separated into
three distinct classes:
Brahmins or Priests.
Ksatriyas or Warriors.
Sudras or Smiths.
beneath these are settled the untouchables or slaves.
The Scythian system had the same three divisions but these were
arranged on the horizontal plane and did not proffer any superior
status in relation to the other castes. If one overlaid the Elven,
Scythian system onto that of the Celtic, which is virtually
identical with the present Hindu system, we would have the following
Scythians: Gods of Heaven
Gods of Heaven and Earth
Gods of Earth
Druidic Royal Ancestors, the transcended ones
Royal Archdruids, Druidesses and Pendragons (vampires)
War Kings, War Lords, Craftsmen, Metalworkers etc.
Caucasian footsoldiers and Dravidian ’Brownies’
- 0 -
Celts: Burgh Chiefs
Farmers: Tinkers: Traders
(Celtic source - Miranda Green
It will be noticed that, contrary to contemporary misconceptions,
Celtic women were in fact just above slaves in terms of their rank
and were regularly bought and sold or exchanged by their men for
cattle, along with the slaves.
It is not a popular view but sadly - given the contemporary academic
discoveries concerning the real nature of Celtic society - it is an
accurate one and, although we would love to blame the Church for
everything, including the oppressive patriarchy that subdued women -
the fact is that the Celts were already treating their women like
chattels before the Church reared its ugly head above the
blood-stained meniscus line of history.
The conversations or entreaties of love we see recorded in the
’Celtic’ Sagas between ’Celtic’ lords and
ladies, were in fact the
exchanges between Scythian men and women. That which is reported as
being the love poetry of the ’Celts’ was instead the love poetry of
the Elves - the Royal Scythians - not that of a brutal farming folk
who had neither lords nor ladies.
Who in history, if he had the rare gift of writing, would bother
wasting such a talent, do you think, by eulogizing the sexual
peccadilloes or romantic longings of a bunch of turnip farmers who
wouldn’t have spoken to women on such equal terms anyway? Romance in
any case didn’t come into it, the Celtic woman shut her mouth and
opened her legs - period.
The art of male wooing and flattery arises when the woman has the
freedom to choose to say no, and the only women who had that choice
then were Scythian Princesses who, because of the mysterious
composition of their blood and its consequent magical powers, had a
lot more to offer their Elven menfolk than the occasional
which is all that nondescript Celtic women could hope to have in
The beauty and exquisiteness of the magic that a Scythian Princess
had to offer could not be taken by force, she had to give it
willingly, otherwise in the act of coercion, her magic would be
tainted and become either useless or poisonous.
Occupying a position higher than the Elven male as Goddesses
incarnate, Elven men were pleased therefore to treat her with
deference and honor and to offer her court in a manner that would
secure her voluntary participation in their sacred congress.
From this obligation of service to such Earthly Goddesses arose the
medieval tradition of Courtly Love which, by no means and under no
circumstances, was ever intended to be offered to the female
descendants of either Celt, Norman or Saxon.
Today, after hundreds of years of oppression, the female descendants
of these poor, downtrodden Celtic and later Anglo-Norman women have
managed, during the closing years of the millennium, to wrest from
their men the equality that evaded their mothers for centuries and
now they demand to stand on an equal footing with their menfolk but
- like their sisterly ancestors, when push comes to shove - they
have nothing more dynamic or magical to offer than a leg over.
However, as the male descendants of the Celts and the later
Anglo-Normans - the examples of manhood living today - have nothing
better or more magical to offer their women either and never have
had, equality between the sexes seems to be quite an equitable and
logical arrangement whereby the mediocre do not differentiate
between, nor discriminate against, each other’s mediocrity on the
basis of gender.
Passing on from the politics of sex originating in the caste system,
we now return to addressing the system as a whole and notice that
the figure above is a generalization which encapsulates the main
divisions between each social level.
As time passed and the population increased, technology developed
and diversified and the main castes became sub-divided into classes
within classes. At length the castes themselves eventually became
overturned and the Warrior Class gained the ascendant, later to be
upturned, in the last 1200 years, by the Merchant Class, whom the
Hindus call the
In the twentieth century we also saw situations where the
untouchables became the rulers, as in China and Soviet Russia.
Presently we have a situation where the Elven Race, at the bottom of
the pile have become the untouchables, whilst the increasingly and
frighteningly acquisitive Peasants and the Merchants are at the top,
having wrested their positions from the block-headed Warriors. The
end product of this fiasco over the last millennium and a half can be
smelled in the air, tasted in the water supply and seen in the eyes
of diseased, starving, third world children.
Its results can be heard in the screams of animals gratuitously
tortured in experiments aimed at testing the toxicity of vanity
products or of medicines intended to make money for these gauche
extortionists whose worthless over-inflated products titillate, save
or prolong the vacuous lives of a race of glorified peasants whose
continued existence has become an abomination to nature and a threat
to Life itself.
At its inception the caste system was not an arbitrary set of
divisions or inequalities established through main force by a
varying collection of sequential oppressors, but a reflection of the
fact that there were differences in the capabilities and capacities
of the different types of human beings alive at the time.
Some were ingenious artists, builders and artisans, some were
naturally gifted traders and negotiators, some had been bred to have
an overview and some were fearless, heroic soldiers. Each group had
its part to play in the functioning of society.
Whilst some peoples - like the Celts - had green fingers and could
make carrots grow rose blossoms in Hell, most Scythians couldn’t
even grow an Infants School size tray of mustard and cress. However,
the Celts were useless at organizing complex societies and depended
on the Scythians for foresight, guidance and protection.
Centuries earlier similar arrangements developed in the east where
the Aryans and the Dravidians, having bashed nine barrel loads of
horse feathers out of each other, finally came to an amicable social
arrangement whereby all parties ultimately benefited. Like the
Celts, the Dravidians could get dinner from dust and their expertise
and practicality was the backbone of the Aryo-Dravidian symbiotic
Such relationships are also commonly to be observed amongst
different species in the natural world and work brilliantly within
what must be admitted is a hierarchical natural order which,
nevertheless is not a system of inequality or self conscious
elitism, but one of necessity.
From about 1800 BC onwards, with the increase in Eurasian
populations, the occurrence of a variety of natural disasters and
the diminishing of range territory through foreign conquests, the
Scythians and the Aryans were forced to seek more settled lives but,
being mainly predators and rangers, they lacked the skills to make
They needed the Hobbit-like peoples of the Celtic and
cultures to tend the land and in times that were becoming
increasingly more violent, these cultures needed the Aryans and
Scythians to protect them.
This tolerance and co-operation continued until the emergence of the
warrior lords, literally the middle class of their day, whose
elitist, hierarchical governmental structures - based on the right
of might - became entrenched in western civilization as the feudal
system during the years of the Roman Church’s
From this point onwards the exploitation of the caste system as an
ideal tool for breeding elitism, division and inequality became rife
as the Roman church, comprising mainly vaishas and peasants, seeing a
chance to claw their way to power, upturned the original caste
system by ninety degrees and turned it into a ladder to enable them
to climb to what they conceived to be the top of the pile and the
Only humans would seek to differentiate and assert their superiority
based on their position within a social structure that, based on
natural law, was originally intended in contrast to be for the
benefit of all and to function through cooperation. In their egotism
humans abused a natural and beneficial order to the detriment of all
those subscribing to it.
In the 20th century the audacity of usurpation continues when the
ignorant middle-classes, shopkeepers and their ignorant shopkeeper
sons, join groups of white supremists who idolize the image of the
blond haired, blue eyed Aryan.
This particular genotype, the warrior, who also occupied the middle
class or caste, seems naturally to appeal to this middle class
today, who unaware of the fact that Aryans had red hair and green
eyes, as a result of their lack of education and intelligence, have
elevated the usurping warrior to the status of a true Aryan king
when in reality the blond haired blue eyed ideal, so beloved of the
Germans and for good reason, was bred, like your average white
racist today, to be as thick as a plank.
A warrior could never have manifest the attributes of
in a million years. Kingship took spirit, wisdom and brains. The
blonde warrior had none of these qualities and wasn’t bred to have.
In the feudal period the warrior was called a baron which stemmed
from the earlier Latin word baro which was in circulation at a time
which was contemporary with the rise of the warrior classes. Baro
literally means ’thickhead’.
It is typical of the racist working and middle classes that they
would pick such a figure to emulate. Aryan means
wise king, not dumb
blonde. The adoration by the German National Socialists of the
blonde warrior god-king and the assumption ever since by successive
generations that he is an Aryan, must have been heavily influenced
by the 13th century Royal Poet Snorri Sturleson.
In his ’Sayings of Har’ he defines a corrupted Scandinavian caste
system consisting of Jarls, Carls and Thralls. The
Jarls says Snorri
were blonde haired, the Carls were red haired and the
Everywhere else the royal coloring is red and this tradition goes
back in the Aryans to Radamanthus, Ariadne and Minos, and through
them to Lilith herself. Even Jesus and Magdalene are regularly and
invariably portrayed with red hair in the Renaissance masterpieces. A
reversal has taken place here where warriors usurped or replaced
kings as leaders of the people.
The warriors were hired Caucasians not bloodline Aryans. The
upheaval and resultant inequity and iniquity within the caste system
occurred when many Aryan queens and kings were legitimately
displaced by their society’s War Kings in times of trouble, but were
never to return to their thrones because the conflicts often carried
on for decades.
Sometimes however, having had a taste of power, treacherous and
greedy warrior Captains decided they would either go it alone or
take over permanently by force of arms. Following this however, an
even more stupid class of people managed to trade and poison their
way to the top.
And who were they? that’s right, the settled warehouse tinkers - the
cheating peasants with money who were the ancestors of the upper and
middle classes of today. Mind you, some of them were sneaky and one
wouldn’t realize that they were and still are middle-class peasants