|

by Joel Bowman
April 07, 2026
from
ClassicalWisdom Website

We
love history and learning the lessons of the past.
In
this column, we note how 'Pax Americana' resembles its
ancient namesake, 'Pax Romana'.
But what was "Pax" Romana really like?
How much peace was there actually... and for whom?
As
the latest deadline looms large, let us explore what
Roman "Peace" was all about... and whether or not it is
a good mirror to our own times.
Anya Leonard
Founder and Director
Classical Wisdom
Historians, not generally known for their wry
sense of humor, often refer to the period since WWII as "Pax
Americana" (Latin for "American Peace").
This is the era during which U.S. hegemony shaped global trade and
security, the age of supranational, alphabet soup institutions,
like,
...etc... along with,
...and other such branches of the so-called
"Rules Based International Order."
Fittingly enough, the period was named after the "Pax
Romana" - the period from roughly 27 BC - 180 AD, during
which emperors from Augustus through to
Marcus Aurelius consolidated
power under Roman law, securing important trade routes across
Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East.
And yet, for the Romans - as for 'the Americans'
- the era was not without conflict.

Extent of the Roman Empire under
Augustus.
Yellow
represents the extent of the Republic in 31 BC,
while green
represents gradually conquered territories
under the reign
of Augustus,
and pink areas
represent client states.
One eye on the vicissitudes of fortune... the other on the
calamities of others... we thumb the pages of history for possible
clues regarding the future…
Though Roman citizens of the Pax Romana era enjoyed a period
of relative peace inside the imperial gates, with some very notable
exceptions,
bloody wars raged on almost constantly
outside them, as the empire fought for control of lands and
trade routes near and far.
Naturally, such campaigns ranged greatly in terms
of ambition, reward and, ultimately, cost...
Frontier skirmishes with nomadic tribes along the
Arabian Desert, for example, were
relatively minor in terms of capital expenditure and "sandals on the
ground," though they were a persistent nuisance for the Great
Power of the day.
Mostly this entailed maintaining forts and
patrols and protecting trade routes along the way, with forces of up
to about ~20,000 men required at any given time for the task.
Not enough to bring a mighty empire to its knees,
but certainly enough to bite at its ankles.
From Gold to
Lead
The
Dacian Wars, meanwhile - two
separate wars waged by
Trajan between 101-102 and
105-106 AD - saw 100,000 soldiers take to the field in what we know
as modern day Romania.
A massive undertaking at the time, in which both
sides suffered enormous human casualties, the spoils of the vast
Dacian goldmines nonetheless helped fill Rome's coffers, just as
victory helped swell her imperial chest... and fill her head with
ideas of greater glory to come.
But while the Dacian Wars were short, and the taste of their
lucre sweet, the same could not be said of Rome's other quagmires,
of which there were no shortage.

Battle scene.
The Dacians (on
the left)
are
attacking Trajan's men.
From
en:Trajan's Column;
this is from
the plaster-cast reproduction
at the Museum
of Romanian History
in
Bucharest, Romania
The
Germanic Wars, for instance, which
lasted on and off for centuries, were a virtually ceaseless drain on
the imperial purse, requiring up to 80,000 soldiers on the front at
a time, most of whom were housed in permanent garrisons along the
Rhine and Danube Rivers.
Constant battles kept the soldiers pitted against
"the barbarians," with many such encounters coming at punishing cost
for the empire.
In the epic
Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, to
name but one bloody scene, three entire Roman legions
(~15,000-20,000 men) were ambushed... and annihilated... in a matter
of days.
Then there were the so-named Britain and Northern Campaigns, which
saw Roman soldiers marching their shiny standard into what is today
Northern England.
While the far flung land offered some bounty -
mostly in the form of tin, lead, some agricultural land and a few
slaves - the fact was
Claudius needed a military
victory to show his restless citizens just 'who was boss'... (sounds
like today's remarks of "somebody"...)
And as nobody had attempted to invade the distant
land since Caesar (perhaps with good reason), Briton must
have seemed as good a spot as any for the wily ruler.
As
Cassius Dio writes two
centuries later:
"Claudius desired to win glory by making a
conquest... and so he undertook a campaign against Britain."
Muck and Mire
Alas, as with the barbarians, the Romans were never fully able to
bring the Britons under heel.
Instead, they found themselves entrenched, bogged
down, sank ever deeper into the muck and mire of their own
expansionist ambitions... which would persist for some 80 more
years, until
Hadrian shifted gears from
offense to defense... and to drawing a stone line around the empire.
Truly, few things say "high tide of empire" quite like
Hadrian's Wall, a 117kms (73 miles)
fortification just south of the Scottish border... constructed more
than 2,000kms (by Roman roads) from the Imperial City.
That's the fortification against those further
northern tribes, such as the scrappy
Picts, feisty
Caledonians, and the rest of the
bedraggled peasants huddled up on the very edge of those dreary
isles, in what is today's Scotland.
To say the empire had overextended itself would
be something of an understatement.
And yet, for all the waste and squander, the mud and the blood and
the flat, warm beer... for all those protracted northern
expeditions... their battling the barbarians at the gates... and
tracking the Arabian nomads around and around the deserts... these
misadventures amounted to little next to the losses sustained during
Rome's primary Great Power rivalry during the so-called
Pax Romana...
We refer, of course, to Rome's epic wars with the vast
Parthian Empire, centered in the
ancient land we know today as...
Iran...
|