by Kenton Biffert and Paul Smeaton
May 20, 2021
Photo from the new WHO report,
'COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic'
Editor in Chief
of Technocracy News
'recommendations' of the report
political leaders of each nation
would become the
puppets of the WHO
decides to declare a pandemic.'
How thinly veiled can
blackmail and extortion get?
The totally corrupt
World Health Organization (WHO)
is calling for global surveillance, authority and billions more
in funding in order to ensure that there won't be pandemics
in the future...
If the WHO has the ability to stop future pandemics, then they
could have stopped the current one. Or, did they create this one
in the first place?
This is a
straight-forward shakedown of the entire planet, reminiscent of
mobsters in Chicago who would approach a store owner and say,
"For a mere $500
per week, we will protect your store from burning down like
Mr. Jones' experienced down the street."
from the WHO are:
pandemic preparedness and response to the highest level
of political leadership.
the independence, authority and financing of WHO.
preparedness now to prevent the next crisis.
A new agile
and rapid surveillance information and alert system.
pre-negotiated platform for tools and supplies.
international financing for pandemic preparedness and
Pandemic Coordinators' have a direct line to Head of
State or Government.
The authors of this
article recognized the importance of the cited UN report, but
were unable to find much commentary.
I was pleased to be
able to contribute my thoughts.
The pro-abortion World Health Organization (WHO) has released
a report calling for greater authority for itself in countries
around the globe, a global surveillance system, as well as billions
more dollars in financing for itself.
In a report released this month entitled, 'COVID-19
- Make it the Last Pandemic' (or
PDF), a group called the
"Independent Panel" established by the WHO, analyzed the global
response to the Wuhan Virus and delivered a strong message for
"Our message is loud
If we fail to take
this goal seriously, we will condemn the world to successive
"On the basis of its diagnosis of what went wrong at each stage
of the COVID-19 response, the Panel makes [...] seven
'recommendations' directed to ensuring that a future outbreak does
not become a pandemic.
is linked directly back to evidence of what has gone wrong.
To be successful they
must be implemented in their entirety."
The panel is
co-chaired Rt Hon. Helen
Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand and
Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, former President of Liberia and Nobel
Laureate, and includes eleven other professionals from around the
Patrick Wood, Editor
in Chief of
Technocracy News told LifeSiteNews that,
were the 'recommendations' of the report to be implemented,
political leaders of each nation would become the puppets of the
WHO, whenever it decides to declare a pandemic."
"The WHO is not
never has been independent," Wood continued.
"Rather, it is
a key agency of
the United Nations and subservient to its
ideology. It seeks additional authority over nations and needs
money to accomplish it.
Nobody prevents a virus from spreading,
so the call for more funding is spurious at best.
contributing to the current crisis, they want to prevent the
LifeSiteNews that "total surveillance" is "the holy grail" of the
"sustainable development" agenda, which he says can also be
described as the "technocracy" agenda.
"This is a
fast-track conduit/supply chain for
Big Pharma to push its
therapy shots and vaccines to a generally uninformed global
citizenry," Wood added.
so-called "Independent Panel", Wood said:
The panel of
eleven is far from "independent"...
associated with the elitist
United Nations agencies
One member of the Communist Chinese
Party who was a principal in the COVID outbreak in China
are UN ideologues
To my knowledge
and study, when the United Nations calls for "independent" or
"high level" panels, they are signaling the exact opposite.
elitist/ideologues who populate such panels always and only
promote one thing:
Sustainable Development in all its forms and
control over society...
since September 2020, the panel says that it has,
state of pandemic preparedness prior to COVID-19," as well
as the global responses to COVID-19.
cannot afford to focus only on COVID-19. It must learn from this
crisis, and plan for the next one.
precious time and momentum will be lost. That is why our
'recommendations' focus on the future. COVID-19 has been a
terrible wake-up call.
So now the
world needs to wake up, and commit to clear targets, additional
resources, new measures and strong leadership to prepare for the
We have been
7-page summary document of the full report, the authors of the
report state that,
outbreak became a pandemic as a result of gaps and failings at
every critical juncture of preparedness for and response to
According to the
summary report these failings included,
funding and stress testing of preparedness, despite the
increasing rate at which zoonotic diseases are emerging."
The authors of the
report say that China was,
"quick to spot
unusual clusters of pneumonia of unknown origin," but that the
procedures under the
International Health Regulations were much too slow.
did not act quickly enough with an,
containment strategy," but rather took a "'wait and see'
As the virus
spread, the WHO, trying to support the countries with advice and
guidance, found that,
had underpowered the agency to do the job demanded of it."
was underfunded and response funding was too slow," they say.
The result, they
inequalities" in regards to the "impact on women and vulnerable
and marginalized populations."
The summary report
concludes with seven 'recommendations' that, if acted upon immediately
(by fall 2021) will change the course of how the world deals with
iterate that their 'recommendations' be "fulfilled in their entirety."
focus mainly on increasing the authority and power of the WHO and
vastly increasing the amount of money given annually to them.
"Elevate pandemic preparedness and response to the highest
level of political leadership"
include setting up a "Global Health Threats Council."
"Strengthen the independence, authority and financing of
include increasing the fees of Member States to cover 2/3 of
the WHO (in 2019,
Member State fees made up 51% of the budget).
the authority and independence of the Director-General would
be strengthened and include a,
"single term of office for seven years with no
option for re-election" and that the WHO "be
empowered to take a leading, convening, and
coordinating role in operational aspects of an
emergency response to a pandemic, without, in most
circumstances, taking on responsibility for
procurement and supplies."
"Invest in preparedness now to prevent the next crisis"
is calling governments to update their plans to meet the
benchmarks set by the WHO, which include separate nations
completing peer reviews of each other on their pandemic
also recommends that there be an annual assessment of each
country by the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) regarding their
new agile and rapid surveillance information and alert
needs to establish,
new global system for surveillance, based on full
transparency by all parties, using state-of-the-art
digital tools to connect information centers around
the world and including animal and environmental
health surveillance, with appropriate protections of
the global surveillance, the Panel is further recommending
that the Director-General be given the authority to act out
"The bias of the current system of pandemic alert is
towards inaction - steps may only be taken if the
weight of evidence requires them.
This bias should be reversed - precautionary action
should be taken on a presumptive basis, unless
evidence shows it is not necessary."
"Establish a pre-negotiated platform for tools and
"Raise new international financing for pandemic preparedness
here is proposing that countries around the world, not only
up their membership fees to the WHO, but work to raise an
additional "US$5-10billion annually to finance preparedness"
so that the WHO can distribute US$50-100 billion at a
moment's notice if needed.
"National Pandemic Coordinators have a direct line to Head
of State or Government"
should have a national pandemic coordinator that will have
the power to drive the coordination of the government
response under the guidance of the WHO.
simulations should be with various populations to make sure
the people remain accountable and know how to respond as
they are expected to.
"Independent Panel" offers a timetable for immediate action.
By September 2021,
the WHO wants to see countries with a "vaccination pipeline" to
begin providing at least 1 billion doses to lower income countries.
are recommending that the WHO take charge to develop the roadmap to
guide the globe to end the Wuhan Virus pandemic and that testing for
the virus be "scaled up urgently" in low and middle-income
Further, as there
is $19 billion US needed to purchase and develop more vaccines in
order to vaccinate all the middle and lower income countries, they
are requesting an immediate $11.4 billion of this cost be incurred
from this report is any analysis of the impact on society that these
'recommendations' will have.
Further, the clear
implication from the document is that the WHO believes it has made
no mistakes in its response to COVID-19 thus far.
The report contains,
no analysis of the impact of the global response to COVID-19 on
small businesses, the middle-class, mental health, the education of
children, health of citizens, infringement on personal rights,
the enormous debt incurred by governments through the investment of
billions of dollars in vaccines and other COVID-related costs...