by Jon Rappoport
Boom, tell the patient he has the epidemic disease...
Obviously, this is absurd. But it happens.
And then you hear or read,
If a patient is actually tested, before a diagnosis is made, the most prevalent method is the antibody test. It's fast.
But there is a problem - a major problem.
Before 1984, this was generally interpreted as a good sign for the patient:
But then the science was turned upside down.
Suddenly, a positive test meant the patient had a disease. Therefore, huge numbers of people were falsely told they were in danger. During times of hysteria, they became "new cases" of some purported epidemic.
They were cited on the news to bolster the idea that the "the virus was spreading"...
One more point:
In very few cases, a patient might be tested with a method called PCR.
In simple terms, this test takes a tissue sample from the patient - a tiny, tiny piece of something that might be a virus... but it's much too small to be observed and identified.
To overcome this problem, the PCR test amplifies that tiny fragment many, many times - like blowing up a photograph. If the test overcomes several challenges and is done correctly, researchers and doctors might be able to infer that the patient has the virus.
BUT the test would reveal nothing about HOW MUCH of the virus he has.
And why is that important?
However, that obvious fact is ignored...
A patient with a positive PCR test is added to the list of epidemic cases - and the news reports,
As you can see, these
major blunders and false interpretations will result
in news about "the spreading epidemic."
These "tests" are about as reliable as randomly pointing to a figure in a photo of a crowd and saying,
Referring to Wuhan, called the center of the epidemic in China, photos of people jamming hospital waiting rooms are cited as "evidence" of the spreading virus and epidemic.
This is preposterous...
Many of these people, experiencing a few typical flu symptoms, have been brainwashed by public announcements into believing they have the "epidemic virus." And then, Wuhan has highly dangerous levels of air pollution.
Wuhan is notorious for polluting smog.
Keep these issues in mind when people automatically claim,