by Tyler Durden
works of art
When does activism for a cause turn into a narcissistic agenda for
attention and self gratification?
There's a fine line,
and the Extinction Rebellion movement has surely crossed it with
their incessant and self-indulgent drama.
This week, motorists in
France were greeted with yet another Extinction group trying to glue
themselves to the pavement of a major thoroughfare to block traffic
in the name of stopping climate change.
However, this time
drivers did not simply sit around waiting for the police to arrive:
instead, they began
dragging the activists off the road by force...
This incident is part of
a growing frustration among normal people in response to climate
cultism, with the Extinction Rebellion movement making up
the bulk of the worst events.
In the past several
months there have been an increasing number of traffic disruptions
and acts of vandalism.
The most prominent
the attempted destruction of major works of art in
national museums, many of them painted centuries before carbon
"pollution" was an issue.
This too has prompted museums to become more aggressive in stopping
activists from using vandalism as a means to get attention.
The inevitable outcome is obvious...
The activists are
going to start getting hurt.
If the cause was
based in reality then the hostility from the public might be
diminished, but the cause is fraudulent...
There is no
global warming and carbon pollution
is not a threat to the future of the planet...
All the talk of global warming in the media might make people
believe that the Earth is rapidly plunging into a hot cauldron of
doom, but the truth according to the numbers of climate scientists
is that the Earth's temperature has risen less than 1°C in the past
the Earth is supposed
to be on the verge of Apocalypse because of less than ONE
DEGREE of heat...
What about context?
Has the Earth ever
been this hot before?
And if so, what
In fact, the Earth has
been much hotter in the past, and there is no
evidence that carbon pollution was a singular trigger.
carbon was not a factor in any previous heating event in the
What is climate
change hysteria and the Extinction Rebellion really all about...?
In the case of activists
the issue is a need for rebellion and desperation for 'a cause.'
These are people who
have far too much time on their hands and a feeling of
inadequacy in life.
In order to bring
meaning to their hapless existence, they have attached
themselves to the climate agenda without researching the
circumstances and data.
In the case of
the corporate media and global
climate institutions funded by
the UN and various
governments, the issue is control...!
legislation along with carbon taxation gives the establishment the
all food production, manufacturing, resource development and
Not to mention, it
creates an excuse for the implementation of population
In a world where 'the
UN' and 'Extinction activists' get their way, there might be
a very real extinction involving mass reduction in energy output,
the decline of the global economy and available agriculture.
The world cannot sustain
on green technology which is highly inefficient and
coal and perhaps nuclear power are the only practical
resources to maintain our current civilization...
But maybe that's the
Maybe the ultimate
goal is to create a production environment that is so
restrictive that only governments can manage it, while private
businesses are forced out of the market.
Maybe the goal is to
make production and economy into a point of leverage that can be
used to muscle the public into compliance with more
Maybe climate change
is nothing more than a springboard for tyranny...
The Club of Rome, a group of
globalists sponsored by the UN, once stated in their book 'The First Global Revolution':
"In searching for a
common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea
that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages,
famine and the like, would fit the bill.
In their totality and
their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat
which must be confronted by everyone together.
But in designating
these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have
already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for
All these dangers are
caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is
only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be
The real enemy then
is humanity itself..."
The quote comes from
Chapter 5 of the treatise titled The Vacuum, which covers
the concept of global government.
It suggests that
global warming and environmental hysteria,
are not actual
threats, but fabricated dragons created for
gullible activists to slay.
Not only that, but
these dragons are creations of human existence and subsistence.
The only way to kill
these paper thin dragons is total centralization, giving governments
and global institutions ultimate power to "save humanity from
How convenient for the
The activists on the the other hand as simply useful idiots
being used to set fires to western civilization, to create havoc and
inspire a sense of impending climate catastrophe that will
They might believe that
once carbon controls are put in place they will have earned a seat a
the table, or that their future's within the establishment edifice
are assured. This is probably not the case...
As history often shows
with these kinds of movements,
once the activists
have served their purpose, the elites do away with them...!